TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

DeVos decries ‘failed system’ on campus sexual assault, vows to replace it

NScorpion

September 7, 2017
179 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/grade-point/wp/2017/09/07/protesters-gather-anticipating-devos-speech-on-campus-sexual-assault/?utm_term=.0706b4c9754f
Archived from /r/MensRights

r/MensRights is a community advocating for the social and legal equality of men and boys since 2008.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/MensRights archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title DeVos decries ‘failed system’ on campus sexual assault, vows to replace it
Author

NScorpion

Upvotes 179
Comments 65
Date September 7, 2017 7:03 PM UTC
(8 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6ypc19/devos_decries_failed_system_on_campus_sexual/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/devos-decries-failed-system-on-campus-sexual.914684
https://theredarchive.com/post/914684
Top posts by NScorpion

Back to basics.

1596 upvotes
January 23, 2017
/r/PussyPassDenied

A woman commits murder-suicide, headline still somehow manages to imply it's a man's fault

276 upvotes
April 25, 2018
/r/MensRights

Woman tries to hang her child and grievously injures many in her attempt to flee. Is completely let off the hook because "her children need her"

240 upvotes
July 17, 2018
/r/MensRights

My friend is in an emotionally abusive relationship and nearly every resource or article I found online assumes that your a woman being abused by a man.

67 upvotes
December 1, 2017
/r/MensRights

...

6 upvotes
December 1, 2017
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]unbelievablepeople 54 points55 points56 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Sexual assault accusations should be investigated by law enforcement authorities who have training in collecting evidence and questioning witnesses. Not by college professors who volunteer to sit in on student discipline hearings in their free time.

[–]TracyMorganFreeman 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Plus they're limited in what they can do because due process rights.

[–]trentaiced 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A 10 hour seminar on sexual assault doesn't give them the tools to properly investigate either. The police still fuck up a lot, but I'd rather any sexual assault be tried in a court of law than investigated by a school.

[–]Apexbreed 29 points30 points31 points 8 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

The clearest and most consistent signal from this administration has been that it is uninterested in civil rights at best, and opposed to civil rights at worst.

Do these fucking morons not realize that due process IS a civil right?!? If the accused were black males being arrested by white cops, their tone would immediately change to support the accused. Idiots...

[–]keonkla 22 points23 points24 points 8 years ago* (9 children) | Copy Link

Yep, as a black dude I'm honestly just sick of the left using us as some type of weapon against white dudes. Its why I had to abandon some of my deeply liberal values when growing up for a more Centrist-right Perspective.

[–]Apexbreed 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Good for you, bro. Fuck those lowlifes using people for their bullshit agendas.

[–]Mens-Advocate 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Good man for thinking independently!

I'd be willing to argue that feminism, misandry, and female bad behaviour have been even worse to black men than to white men.

And the official black civil rights organisations seem completely subordinate to feminism. As examples, they were petrified to defend Clarence Thomas or Delmar Simpson, and they had not one word of objection to the Colour Purple's portrayal of black males as either brutes of buffoons.

[–]openup91011 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Your point is really interesting to me, not in a bad way at all, I just meant everything you said in parallel with black women starting/intensifying the whole "white feminism" thing.

[–]Rumpadunk 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

A lot of issues black men face aren't (very significant) issues by black women. A lot of issues faced by black men are just even worse versions of what white men experience.

For example, the war on drugs primarily locks up men- 12:1 ratio. It also primarily locks up colored folks, 310:1. So white women:blackwomen:whitemen:blackmen is approximately 1:10:12:120 (assuming that the ratios are independent), which means white men are still 4x1.2x more likely to be locked up on drug charges than black women, yet black men are an even further 3x10x likely than that.

(12x and 3x are approximates of what I remember, it might be something like 11x and 4x ya know)

Assumption of being a rapist, violent, or being a bad parent are other examples.

[–]TBFProgrammer 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It's more like 4:1 vs 3:1, asfair, leaving the total 1:3:4:12 or so. While the male:female ratio is worse than the black:white ratio, the two are more similar than different.

[–]Rumpadunk 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/dofp12.pdf

92.5/7.5 is 12.333:1 ratio men:women

And 21.8:31.8 factoring in population is 21.8/73.6:38.8/13.6 which gives us about 9.6:1 black:white

So 12.333 and 9.6 are both higher, especially for black people. That gives us 1:9.6:12.33:118.4

Literally black men more than 100x likely than a white woman. Well, this assumes independence and doesn't take into consideration differences in age. Still, it's ridiculous.

[–]Mens-Advocate 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And I contest the reasonableness of any sort of coalition between white women and black men to fight racism and sexism, when white women are cosseted and spoilt and in many ways have been the enemies of black men, including white women comparing sexism to racism.

[–]Dancing_Anatolia 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's so weird man. Every day I think I just get closer to believing Horseshoe Theory as an absolute. The Left is just the Right with a new coat of paint.

[–]Junkbunkfunk 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The far left emboldens the far right and gives them more converts. How the left has handled Trumps election is going better than anyone on the right has hoped

[–]dontdoxmebro2 53 points54 points55 points 8 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

CNN headline: Trump enables rapists to escape justice by due process loophole.

[–]mwobuddy 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

hashtag fake news.

[–]cld8 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

CNN headline: Trump enables rapists to escape justice by due process loophole.

CNN did not say that. Please stop spreading false information, or people will lose respect for this sub.

[–]contractor808 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's a joke.

[–]superhobo666 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The joke

Your head.

[–]Pz5 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Proving that feminism is entrenched within the media.

[–]Dmva100 -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Oh look a white knight beta male cuckold

[–]Junkbunkfunk 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You forgot "gamer"

[–]Dmva100 -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The black hentai dong getting in his booty hole too? Damn

[–]superhobo666 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nah he doesn't actually use it, he keeps it on a shelf on the walls, kind of like a large nylon trophy.

[–]Swordfish101101 14 points15 points16 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

This is STILL insane! Not one mention of the fact that... COLLEGES ARE NOT LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES AND NOT THE POLICE OR COURTS OF LAW. Anyone working at a school should go to jail THEMSELVES or at the very least fired for even attempting such an insane thing! And all she says is that it needs to be 'reformed.' (????)

NO, if someone has assaulted you, stole from you, raped you, you call the FUCKING POLICE. If you decline to call the police if you have been supposedly 'raped' and just tell the people at your school instead then you might as well just go ahead and admit you're making a false accusation because it's OBVIOUS if you're not going to the police. What? Because you don't 'trust' the police? NO, it's because the police are going to INVESTIGATE, because that is their JOB. WHY? So they can gather evidence in order to make an ARREST and then later a conviction, NOT because they're calling you a liar, but then of course your lie is going to fall apart in the questioning and THEN now YOU'RE going to be in trouble and possibly be facing prison time for making a FALSE ACCUSATION.

What's next? Is WAL-MART and other giant companies in the private sector going to start forming 'courts' to 'try' it's employees for stealing from the company and assaulting and/or raping other employees?

From the OTHER direction this is an obvious FARCE- if you had REALLY been raped, the only punishment that you and your family want for the rapist is to just GET EXPELLED FROM SCHOOL and not go to prison?!? THIS IS INSANE.

[–]openup91011 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

not because they're calling you a liar

Even then - it seems like they're going to the campus admins because they KNOW they dont have to have solid evidence. I don't mean to be shitty toward women, and I know it sucks in cases where there just wasn't/isn't enough physical evidence, BUT THIS IS OUR LEGAL SYSTEM.

EVIDENCE SUPPORTS INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN MOTHERFUCKING GUILTY. It's sad, and I truly feel for the women who just didn't have enough evidence (speaking as one myself), but this is how it is here and that is the system that now TRIES to make things WORK.

Ugh!!! motherfucking god damnit!!

[–]cld8 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

What's next? Is WAL-MART and other giant companies in the private sector going to start forming 'courts' to 'try' it's employees for stealing from the company and assaulting and/or raping other employees?

Walmart already does that. If they believe you have stolen something or raped someone, they can fire you. Your supervisor/manager makes this decision and that's that.

Of course, getting fired from Walmart is no big deal. You can just get a job somewhere else. It doesn't ruin your life.

[–]unbelievablepeople 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The difference is that Walmart is a private company that makes private hiring and firing policies. Title IX is a government policy that applies to schools that receive federal funds (all public schools and even most private schools receive some federal funds). Because it comes directly from the federal government, there's an even greater imperative for the due process that is supposed to be a bedrock principle of our country.

[–]Swordfish101101 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You're saying if you're caught stealing working at Wal-Mart, they don't call the police?

[–]cld8 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They could, but they aren't required to. I don't know if they would or not, but my guess is that it depends on the value of what you stole.

[–]keonkla 31 points32 points33 points 8 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Welp! at least we achieved something with Donald Trumps victory. The Title IX Law was heavily flawed and I'm glad to see it being replaced. If anything I think the National Collation for men needs to have even more conferences with her.

This is just one, of the many steps we are going to try to make collage/The educational system much more male friendly.

This is why I voted for trump mainly, He was are best bet in seeing some Lessening of the Gynocentric War on men and masculinity. Looks like its paying off to.

[–]ElectricBlueSkyline 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

YES!

This is exactly what I'd hoped DeVos would have the balls to do. Yes, it doesn't go far enough but it's a start.

[–]IronJohnMRA 20 points21 points22 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That’s not really appropriate on the campus level. We’re not locking people up, executing them, putting them away for years denying their liberty.

You might as well be. The damage done to them via these kangaroo courts is just as severe.

[–]Apexbreed 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'd much rather be secretly locked up for a few years than publicly humiliated with phony rape accusations that will destroy any chance I have for a successful and peaceful life, but not face any incarceration. These sexist pieces of trash have zero idea how much their witch hunts destroy mens' lives.

[–]Halafax 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

These sexist pieces of trash have zero idea how much their witch hunts destroy mens' lives.

They know.

[–]mymraccount_ac 17 points18 points19 points 8 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

That is really good news for those in the US. Hope the public consultation works out. Sure will piss off the 'progressive' left to lose the power to ruin young men's lives based on nothing by the whim of another though, and they will fight hard against this.

[–]Jakester5112 13 points14 points15 points 8 years ago* (14 children) | Copy Link

Stuck in a car listening to some feminist author talk about this. She's saying boys (notice she never mentions girls can rape) have been fostered to not ask for consent. Also, campuses will be "much less safe" now that it'll be rolled back. She says there won't be justice when you have real professionals investigating.

Essentially, she doesn't want there to be a fair trial and just wants men guilty as accused.

Sorry for the rant, it's just really pissing me off.

Edit: I guess it's NPR

[–]openup91011 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

NPR??

I was just in the car on the way home listening to this and I didn't notice why I was getting so enraged until I realized she kept saying "boys," not "men" or even "young men."

This whole "debate" upsets and confuses me, even as a late 20's woman. WHY ARE WE LETTING COLLEGE ADMINS ACT LIKE JUDGE AND JURORS?! The fact that she even said shit like "[victims] should be able to CROSS EXAMINE their [perpetrators] and possible witnesses" blows my god damn mind!!!

I work in a law firm, and have for my entire post-college life, THIS IS NOT HOW THINGS ARE SUPPOSED TO WORK!!!!

/rant

Sorry. I just got SO upset listening to that.

[–]Jakester5112 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

And for some reason she feels it's unfair to use the POLICE instead of colleges. She knows when you use the police the "rapist" won't be automatically guilty. She's disguising it as being unsafe for women, when it's actually safer to go through the police.

[–]openup91011 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This has always been my issue with the campus rape thing - WHY ARE THEY TRYING TO CIRCUMVENT OUR LEGAL SYSTEM!!!

I personally am someone who was sexually assaulted while I was in college (supporting that possibly false 1:4 stat - I was with 3 other girls at the time...) but guess what? It was in a crowd and I DIDNT HAVE EVIDENCE! I didn't KNOW, man or woman, who actually did it! I didn't go to the cops because, ok so someone grabbed my ass and I don't know who - I'm a big girl, it happens, people are weird.

Anyway...it truly TRULY enrages me when people want to circumvent our system because they KNOW they don't have the evidence! You want to be judge and juror because you're after BLOOD.

And the examples of "assaults" she gave?! Bitch, please! So "a cheerleader at a football party consents to sleeping with a player and during it two of his friends walk in the room!" Uhm....and now they all assaulted/raped you?! NO!! You either continue riding and make eye contact (to establish dominance - joke) or you throw the covers over yourself and scream for the two extra men to LEAVE THE FUCKING ROOM! Or YOU leave wrapped in the bed sheets, get that guy's number and try again another day.

I feel like I'm taking crazy pills here.

[–]juanml82 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

And the examples of "assaults" she gave?! Bitch, please! So "a cheerleader at a football party consents to sleeping with a player and during it two of his friends walk in the room!" Uhm....and now they all assaulted/raped you?! NO!! You either continue riding and make eye contact (to establish dominance - joke) or you throw the covers over yourself and scream for the two extra men to LEAVE THE FUCKING ROOM! Or YOU leave wrapped in the bed sheets, get that guy's number and try again another day.

But... but... but that implies women have agency. That they are adults and not children who need to be protected from the evils of the world.

/s

[–]Mens-Advocate 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Maybe accused college males should:

  • refuse any interaction with administrators without benefit of counsel
  • go directly from the initial admin meeting to the police to demand a professional investigation.

[–]Red_Historian 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I wonder what the consequences would be if you just immediately filed charges in a real court for defamation of character because the accusations are causing emotional and material distress?

[–]Mens-Advocate 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Amen and thank you!

[–]mwobuddy 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

have been fostered to not ask for consent.

Right. by women. Who find asking for consent at least 'unsexy' and at most 'sexual harassment'.

If asking for consent is all it takes to be the good guy, I guess Im off to the bar to walk up to random women and ask them if they want to fuck.

Oh, but that'd be sexual harassment. Dammit! Still haven't figured out how to 'ask the right way'.

[–]Jakester5112 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And of course it's the man's responsibility to ask. What if a man doesn't give consent? Still guilty of rape for some reason. This is really pissing me off.

[–]killcat 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's a test and a filter, are you "Hot" then the woman will make it abundantly clear she's interested, will respond positively to any interaction, and will probably never consider even a drunken fuck fest rape. If your not then fuck off, and if you even LOOK at her it's sexual harassment.

[–]superhobo666 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How to ask the right way

Step 1: be rich

Step 2: be attractive

Step 3: see: Step 1

[–]Aivias 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They make it seem like men should just be walking up to women and saying

"You are attractive. I would be interested in engaging in some sexual contact with you, do you consent to my touching/kissing/caressing/sucking/penetrating?"

Except every single woman on the face of the planet would be instantly revolted by such things because for them to have sex with you, you have to pretend you dont want to have sex with them but be charming/friendly/sexy enough for them to be OK with you whittling them down enough to agree to sleeping with you.

I mean I read a TwoX post complaining that a man had lied in order to sleep with the OP but where was the self-awareness? Where was the thought pattern of "Im so shallow that all it takes is some slightly convincing lies and Ill open my legs to a random man Ive never met before"? It wasnt there, it was just about being manipulated into it, feeling like it was assault. A man uses a successful strategy, proven to work, and its his fault that women fall for it and he should be nicer and not do it so that only the more sexually predatory and sociopathic men can.

[–]SirSausagePants 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I listened to this too, and the whole time I was yelling at the interviewer to ask "What about false accusations, and the fact that schools will not retract the expulsion even after the accused is proven innocent?" I was fucking livid.

[–]Dmva100 -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

NPR is run by a Jewish cuckold. His wife was my history teacher and deviated from the curriculum to talk about the Holocaust and tried to inject the class with Yiddish/Jewish values by making us study songs and culture.

Right up there with CNN in terms of bias crap agenda. Not quite fake news dept. Yet

[–]Wagnerous 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

As a staunch democrat I think this administration has been a disaster, but this is the one positive change I was hoping for after the election results.

I respected Hillary and I'm happy to say I voted for her, but I never had any illusions to the fact that her presidency would have represented a direct threat to men's rights in this country, I just felt that as an entire package she was clearly a better option than Trump. I'm deeply unsatisfied with the direction the country is moving in under the current leadership, but this change at least seems to be a step in the right direction.

[–]cld8 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Totally agree. Even though I think DeVos is an incompetent, corrupt secretary who has no business leading the department of education, I will still give her credit where it is due.

[–]Rumpadunk 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Another thing I'm hoping for with this administration is that part of DeVos letting people choose what school they want (which... is a basic way of putting it that doesn't highlight the negatives about it) includes students being able to easily jump out of highschool early and into a college, or for more ECHS (early college highschools) to pop up.

So what follows is quite long, it is a paper I wrote for my ENG 102 class about ECHSs. Holy shit was it hard to convert from a word document to something mostly readable on Reddit. (There is a TL;DR at the end.)


Many high school students receive college credit during high school. This can be done via AP and IB testing during high school, CLEP testing once you enter college, dual credit classes at your high school, concurrent enrollment at a college during high school, and in an early college program. Early college programs allow students to go to a real college during their junior and senior years of high school, getting dual credit for those classes. They still experience at least 2 years of normal high school (but potentially still gaining some college credit via AP or dual credit classes, like many normal high schools) beforehand. There are programs similar to early colleges as well, but due to their implementation and the state’s definition of early colleges they are not classified as such. The basic premise is the same though. A girl in my Eng 102 class is not at an early college, but going to UofL full time getting dual credit with her high school.

On average, we spend about $11,000 a year per K-12 student. In some states and DC, it gets to $15,000 or higher. In New York, it’s over $20,000.[1] Average college tuition is only $9,410 for public in-state students; For two-year colleges, it’s only $3,440.[2] By spending $3,440 and a little extra to give additional resources (additional counseling, advising, transportation costs) to these students, you could potentially save over $7,000 a year, per student by allowing students and parents to have the choice to go to early college. AND they would get up to a 2 year head start in college, possibly with an associate's degree by the time they are 18. Many students are bored and want to move faster, save money, or just get a head start. As of 2011 there were only a little over 200 early colleges offered in the entire US, 21 states with none, and another 20 with less than 5. Only CA, TX, GA, NC, and NY offer more than 10 early colleges throughout the state. This is in comparison to 37,100 secondary schools in the US, which means early colleges make up less than 1%.[3] Most people do not even know of early colleges, and many students do not have the option for early college in their area.

[Source of image: Webb and Mayka, 2011] Image of location of ECHSs

Here is some data regarding early colleges: Wiki

  • 92% of early college students graduate from high school, versus the national rate of 69%

  • 86% of graduates enroll in college the next semester after high school graduation.

  • 91% of early college graduates earn transferable college credit.

  • 44% of graduates at schools open 4+ years earn at least one year of college credit.

  • 24% of graduates at schools open 4+ years earn two years of college credit or an associate degree.

  • 70% of early college students are students of color.

  • 59% of early college students are classified as eligible for free or reduced lunch (used as a conservative estimate of how many students' families are low-income). Most early colleges are funded to target first generation college and/or low-income families.

There are obstacles to scaling Early colleges: College eligibility requirements, rules for transferring credits, funding (schools and districts may lose funding for Early Colleges), lack of autonomy for Early Colleges to be less like traditional high schools, and blurred line between dual enrollment and early colleges and different definitions of early colleges in different states.

Scaling any education initiative at the state level is a difficult proposition demanding results, clear strategic vision, focused alignment of enabling policies, and the right funding structures. States must enact the right balance of enabling policies, accounting for policies that define, extend, compel, and maintain high quality implementation and fidelity. As previously stated, definitional language carries significant power. It provides the guardrails and the foundation for Early College High School growth. It is not an accident that the two states, North Carolina and Texas, with the most refined definitional language have also been able to meaningfully scale the approach with 76 and 107 Early College High Schools respectively. [Williams, 25]

Kentucky already has, albeit just one, Early College. Western High School, in JCPS, in partnership with Jefferson Community & Technical College (JCTC). To the best of my ability, Kentucky seems to have no definition of an ECHS (Early College High School). In KRS Chapter 158, there are definitions of

college board

Advanced placement

Dual credit

dual enrollment

International Baccalaureate

but none such for ECHS. Let’s look at part of North Carolina’s definition:

…It is located on the campus of the partner institution of higher education, unless the governing Board or the local board of trustees for a private North Carolina college specifically waives the requirement through adoption of a formal resolution.

and Texas's definition:

Early College High School (ECHS)…An ECHS program must provide for a course of study that, on or before the fifth anniversary of a student’s first day of high school, enables a participating student to receive both a high school diploma and either an associate degree or at least 60 credit hours toward a baccalaureate degree.

There is half to Texas’s definition I’ve left out, which defines the specific codes the school is established under and which students it enables to use the program. Also, note that the program allows for programs to be five years long, as opposed to Western High School’s four. Western High School’s current implementation would fall into a similar definition as described below, as it allows for 60 credit hours in 4 years and has classes taken on JCTC’s campus. Kentucky should create a similar definition that enables all entering high school students in Kentucky, in conjunction with appropriate legislature and funding, to complete an associate’s degree or 60 credit hours in as many as 5 or as little as 4 years at an ECHS, at no additional cost to the student/guardian(s) of an ordinary high school. Let me bring up some information again, as to why we should do this:

  • It allows students to get up to a 2 year head start in their college and career

  • It saves students money by not paying for up to 2 years of college

  • It saves the state and the national government money even taking into consideration additional costs, as community colleges are cheaper than high schools and students will require 2 years less of financial assistance (by free high school, scholarships, grants, loans, money given directly to colleges, etc.)

  • These results have been shown with majority-minority students and majority low income students

Bibliography

Jon Marcus, The Hechinger Report, CNN Money, Sep 5 2013, “AP tests, 'early college': High school students get a head start”

Christina Tynan-Wood, Great Schools, Mar 7, 2016, “What is an early college high school?”

Mary Kenkel, Knowledge Works, Mar 31, 2015, “Ten Things You Didn’t Know about Early College High Schools”

Matt Williams, Knowledge Works, Mar 16, 2015, “Capitalizing on Potential: Scaling Early College High Schools”

Kate Westrich, Knowledge Works, Nov 22, 2011, “Opposing View on Early College High School”

Andrew Burger et. al., American Institutes for Research, SRI International, September 2013, “Early College, Early Success. Early College High School Initiative Impact Study”

Additionally:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_college_high_school
http://schools.jefferson.kyschools.us/High/western/earlycollege.html
http://www.lrc.ky.gov/Statutes/statute.aspx?id=3417
http://www.lrc.ky.gov/Statutes/statute.aspx?id=4203


TL;DR:

  • It allows students to get up to a 2 year head start in their college and career

  • It saves students money by not paying for up to 2 years of college

  • It saves the state and the national government money even taking into consideration additional costs, as community colleges are cheaper than high schools and students will require 2 years less of financial assistance (by free high school, scholarships, grants, loans, money given directly to colleges, etc.)

  • These results have been shown with majority-minority students and majority low income students


Wow, the characters in this is OVER 9000!! I almost had to make a second comment (10,000 character limit)

If anyone can show me how to have something like this: [Webb and Mayka, 2011] except the text hyperlinked and superscripted, please show me. I couldn't get that to work so I didn't superscript it.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ditto.

[–]mastercraftsportstar 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Conservative here, thanks for calling balls and strikes as they come. There's not enough of that nowadays. It's not all bad or all good.

[–]ididntgetchickensoup 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If Clinton became president, this would have never happened.

Go Betsy Devos

Hate you for Amyway and rest all polices.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Perhaps the only good thing to come from this adminstration.

[–]superhobo666 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I remember how the left fucking raked Betsy over the coals during the election. Is it because she doesn't follow the bullshit Cult of Feminism?

[–]a-man-from-earth 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Mostly because 1) she's unqualified, and 2) her vouchers policy. I would add her theocratic ideas.

[–]iwanttheblanketback 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Link for the Adblock blocker.

[–]augustfell 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Unfortunately, it's going to take years for this system to be rolled back. There are way too many people who have an institutionalized interest in it.

Also, a lot of the administrators will drag their feet on reforms while they wait for Trump to be replaced by a Democrat in 2020.

To make actual change in the next three years DeVos needs to make serious threats of pulling federal funding for schools that maintain the kangaroo-court system.

[–]a-man-from-earth 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

they wait for Trump to be replaced by a Democrat in 2020.

I don't see that happening. The Democrats haven't even started pulling their heads out of their asses.

[–]Male_Positive 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It is a crappy way to progress forward. I would rather see it go out with a bang. This is sort of like if Britain made a peace deal with Hitler and WWII never really happened and Hitler was never blasted to nothing in WWII. Instead he just behaved a little better.

[–]Dmva100 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If i was writing a survey to gauge how many women had been sexually assaulted, and my funding was based on this, it is in my best interest to inflate this number.

So what I would do is ask a question like "has you or ANYONE YOU KNOW been groped or touched inappropriately in a sexual manner?  (This allows for a much wider range of things to be included as I get to determine it all as sexual assault as opposed to what SHE 'thinks'  was sexual assault.  Afterall I wouldn't want her making up her own mind on whether or not she's a victim do I?  This is MY survey).

What this also does is allow one incident to be included multiple times.

Example:

10 girls are on a night out and Rebecca gets groped and tells the dude to fuck off.  She doesn't consider it a sexual assault and she laughs it off with her girlfriends and moves on with her night.

Now the next day in class a sociology graduate gives those 10 girls the survey and asks the questions:

'Have you, or ANYONE YOU KNOW, ever been groped or touched inappropriately in a sexual manner?  Made unwanted physical contact?  Etc.  Etc.

Now 9 of these women saw Rebecca get groped, so seeing the 'anyone you know' part of the question, they all answer yes, including Rebecca.

When you tally it up, you have Rebecca getting some ass-grabbing and hey presto, it's now 10 cases of sexual assault.  Now take that "100%" rate of sexual assault and apply for emergency funding and blast it across campus newspapers/tv media.

DeVos is doing the right thing. The whole thing is about money at the expense of women AND men. Victimize women, demonize men = profit

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter