Michael Kimmel: Men Using Anti-Discrimination Laws Against Women-Only Groups Have "Aggrieved Entitlement"

Wisemanner · 2018-05-11T15:37:16+00:00

"Stony Brook’s Kimmel said that mindset echoes other parts of the current political atmosphere. “Part of the general political context of this is what I call ‘aggrieved entitlement,’” Kimmel said, a stance he described as, “we’re entitled to go anywhere we want, at any time we want, and when people try to restrict that access, we feel like we’re the ones aggrieved.” More garbage from Kimmel.

Men have been perfectly happy for centuries with women-only spaces; what is happening now is that they are beginning to fight back.

andejoh · 2018-05-11T16:33:11+00:00

“we’re entitled to go anywhere we want, at any time we want, and when people try to restrict that access, we feel like we’re the ones aggrieved.”

How is that different from the way feminists view what women are entitled to?

JStheHammer · 2018-05-11T15:35:39+00:00

I'm surprised that feminists would be discriminating since they belive in equality.

ArchVileRespawned · 2018-05-11T16:34:06+00:00

[permanently deleted]

thrway_1000 · 2018-05-11T17:19:16+00:00

Fuck Kimmel, he's a feminist douche that no one should listen to.

Archive -- https://archive.is/EYT8Y

the-capitan · 2018-05-11T17:52:51+00:00

And corporate America remains male-dominated: Men still run 95 percent of S&P 500 companies and hold most corporate board seats.

And America's poverty pipeline remains male-dominated: Men still constitute 95% of prison inmates and 80% of homeless people with virtually no opportunity for shelters of any kind.

HiredMind · 2018-05-11T15:50:23+00:00

I propose a new rule: do not link directly to articles that attack us. If anti-male articles show high readership numbers, we'll just get more of them. Let's not feed the beast, okay?

Use http://archive.is/

serial_crusher · 2018-05-11T19:55:20+00:00

“we’re entitled to go anywhere we want, at any time we want, and when people try to restrict that access, we feel like we’re the ones aggrieved.”

Uh yes. If you have the legal right to go somewhere, and somebody illegally stops you from going there, that’s like the textbook definition of the word “aggrieved”

HotDealsInTexas · 2018-05-11T21:15:03+00:00

Reminder: this is the guy whose work is often cited as an example of how much Feminism cares about men.

ZimbaZumba · 2018-05-11T18:11:27+00:00

It seems a legal principal is a legal principal unless it comes round and bites you.

Consilio_et_Animis · 2018-05-11T19:39:50+00:00

“There are little wrinkles in gender inequality where it does appear that men are discriminated against".

LOL

Leinadro · 2018-05-11T19:32:30+00:00

To the privileged, consistency feels like entitlement.

Kuramo · 2018-05-12T00:36:12+00:00

Let's forget that feminist asshole of Kimmel, there is a new guy on the MRM's heroes list and his name is Alfred Rava

Splatriarchy · 2018-05-11T20:42:56+00:00

Love how the title of the article is "Men Cry Discrimination..."

jeff_the_nurse · 2018-05-12T00:41:25+00:00

Or we have consistency in accountability...

JStheHammer · 2018-05-11T16:39:25+00:00

I don't understand why every attorney isn't doing this.

MenDeserveRights · 2018-05-12T07:40:47+00:00

This is a really stupid article, but Kimmel has written one good article at least.

McGauth925 · 2018-05-12T13:36:30+00:00

It's very simple: men want to be treated equally with women. Screw the bullshit of special treatment to make up for millennia of oppression; that's an excuse to punish all men and privilege all women, somehow in the name of equality. Keep it up and more of us go MGTOW, which means women fend entirely for themselves and forego quite a lot of special treatment.

azazelcrowley · 2018-05-13T23:38:48+00:00

Michael Kimmel has turned his field into a joke. His lifes work is to be yes man for feminist bigotry, and because he is a man in that field, he is forced to adhere to the most repulsive possible interpretations of feminist doctrine or risk ostracization. Sympathy for men and their plight is not tolerated from professional male feminists to any degree.

He is a waste of ink, a blight to his chosen field, and a detriment to the species.

He has had a negative impact on society and humanity, and that is the total of his contribution. I can find nothing to suggest he has had a positive impact on any person. The world would have been better were he never born, or died early. His work is proof of concept that the notion of a feminist mens movement is a contradiction in terms. He is an apologist for misandry and that apologism is used as evidence misandrists care about men.

ThatDamnedImp · 2018-05-11T16:55:43+00:00

Liberals think that only other people should have to follow the rules, and that laws only exist to protect their chosen groups.

The are just phonies and sophists.

Arthas_Greyjoy · 2018-05-11T18:29:02+00:00

Michael Kimmel? Isn't that the faggot in the red pill movie?

Title	Michael Kimmel: Men Using Anti-Discrimination Laws Against Women-Only Groups Have "Aggrieved Entitlement"
Author	lostapwbm
Upvotes	66
Comments	38
Date	May 11, 2018 3:16 PM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/8iojfg/michael_kimmel_men_using_antidiscrimination_laws/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/michael-kimmel-men-using-anti-discrimination-laws.1177934 https://theredarchive.com/post/1177934

Comments