Question

Sydnaktik · 2022-07-25T17:23:06+00:00

The assumption that it is only men who perpetrate sexism against women and it is only women who perpetrate sexism against men is completely wrong.

Men will promote misandry and women will promote misogyny all the time.

Be careful not to assume that you're getting the full story on sexual discrimination about distant places. Whether it be in the past or in far away places like the middle east.

While these places abound with evidence of harsh and barbaric treatments towards women that wouldn't be visited upon men. The harsh and barbaric treatments towards men that wouldn't be visited upon women of these same places are often far worse, they just don't make the news.

beleidigtewurst · 2022-07-25T18:10:25+00:00

Alright so a woman here and I've been considering that maybe both genders are oppressed in different parts of the world and aspects of life? What do you guys think?

Of course.

The issue is, the push to address the issues is one sides.

Let this sink in: I've figured that Rwanda genocide was about killing exclusively men only after one Rwandan lady complained that after genocide, 70% of the population are women and they are struggling with finding partners.

Imagine it was the other way around. How many sources shouting out "femicide" would there be?

Heck, Covid-19 would be "femicide" if it was women, not men, who died twice as often as the other sex. But alas, we, men, have failed you once again.

random_user_lol0 · 2022-07-25T16:54:12+00:00

There’s discrimination against both genders,but in some countries misandry is more present and in some countries misogny is more present

Aardwolfington · 2022-07-25T16:44:59+00:00

The entire shitty state of our world, and not just in this issue, is a few bad apples spoiling the whole bunch.

mrbeets6000 · 2022-07-25T17:18:06+00:00

In some places misogyny is prevalent and in other places misandry is prevalent. In developed countries it is misandry that is prevalent. the MRM is about fighting misandry, which is why we are talking about developed countries inherent sexism.

ld2gj · 2022-07-25T17:46:15+00:00

OP, you are correct. I'm from the US and have lived in Japan and currently in Korea. Both genders are oppressed in different ways in different countries.

SteveorJimmyorJack · 2022-07-25T19:51:54+00:00

I believe that discrimination is against both genres, though society is focused in caring for one while opressing the other.

Nachtlicht_ · 2022-07-25T20:17:25+00:00

It's not even different places or aspects of life. Might as well be the same.

That's kind of the point of the sub - both genders are discriminated against - not necessarily by the opposite gender.

The thing is not only discrimination against men lack recognition (if people shared your views that be a huge win for MRA) it is often being justified as "positive discrimination" and constantly ignored by mainstream like UN or Amnesty International, literally every huge organisation or company on purpose doesn't speak about it at all or even spreads it. Women are the victims - that's their agenda. Isn't only half of the truth kind of a lie?

DirtyPartyMan · 2022-07-25T19:28:54+00:00

You do have a valid point. I feel many in both camps feel similarly. The infighting between sexes simply keeps us divided and our focus away from where it belongs.

Our System. Those who call themselves Officials. Those same officials that game the system in their favors.

leoawesom · 2022-07-26T00:05:20+00:00

A little late to the party, but Mens Rights to me is about advocating for more encompassing coverage of troubles that plague men. I do NOT advocate for the reduction of wonens rights and or issues that play in part. The problem is that a lot of people don’t see it that way. Men and women inherently have different issues. Some biological, some societal, and some im embedded in our media and culture. The goal should be to elevate people not put them down. Lets take some of the areas where men are often over looked by the media and our peers.

Boys are more likely to not graduated highschool over girls.
Boys are more likely to be ignored in a class setting, because we mature slower than girls. (Maturation ends at 21-23 for most boys where girls start earlier and end earlier.
Men are more likely to kill themselves, meaning they have conviction.(They choose deadlier methods and tend to act upon their thoughts)
Men have shorter life expectancy than women, partially in part that they do far more dangerous and strenous jobs on average.

These are just some things that the mass media ignores in regards to men. Its no surprise that it doesn’t make mainstream media, because quite frankly it doesn’t fit the narrative.

Women on the other hand their fight tends to be towards representation in the work place or in college.

Women are more likely to go into professions that are more compassion focused and emotionally driven, leaving the women who are in STEM in fierce competition with their male counter parts.
Women tend to be the target of predatory marketing practices over men, due to biological needs and the ever encompassing coporate bullshit of production of women aimed things.
Women consistently seem to be in the center fold of prochoice vs pro life debate making them the enemy of some side of society.

But more importantly than gender specific things we deal with, there are things society has just forced upon us.

Toxic Masculinity and Toxic Femininity, this idea that choosing to be inherently either is damaging or wrong. Like wise to be the opposite of either finds you ostrisized by the same society for being “to soft” or “to aggressive”
Mutilation of childrens genitalia and the weird new enshirement of pedophilia as an accept form of sexuality (seriously? like this needs to go)
MGTOW and WGTOW let men and women choose to be free of emontional burdens of families and marriage. The nuclear family is dead and no one should be forced to feel otherwise.

But if you got to the end thanks. I feel we can learn a lot from each others struggles, but only when we accepts that both genders have some struggle. We can change that by being the bigger people as MRAs and choosing to acknowledge the struggle of women,but push back on the hurtful stereotypes that damage men.

Al_Modir · 2022-07-26T00:07:30+00:00

The difference is women are allowed to be very vocal about bad things that happen to them but men are always shut down and harassed and ridiculed for ever speaking about things that happen to them. This is to such an extent that we take for granted that certain feminist talking must be true even when they are blatant lies, like women being the biggest victims in domestic violence and that there is a wage gap are two examples that come to mind.

Also if you pay attention the hatred men get from women as a group is completely unjustified and based on their experience with the worst men out there. For example if you go to any feminist subs on reddit the posts usually go something like this: someone finds some random atrocious thing that some lowlife man has said or some on the internet, posts a screenshot, and then everyone comes in with all their commentary about how shit men are when in fact the kind of people they are presenting there wouldn’t even be respected and tolerated by other good men. In contrast most of the things you’d see here would be examples of bigotry from influential and highly respected women and feminists whose views are tolerated by most of mainstream society and most women. This is very indicative of the dishonesty in leftist/feminist circles.

az226 · 2022-07-26T01:50:24+00:00

Speaking up against wrongs toward women is applauded. Speaking up against wrongs toward men is censored, self-censored, and criticized.

tenchineuro · 2022-07-26T01:30:23+00:00

Alright so a woman here and I've been considering that maybe both genders are oppressed in different parts of the world and aspects of life?

Oppression is a Marxist device to drive two factions apart. It's worked in a lot of places and hundreds of millions of those countries citizens have been killed by the government that supposedly supports 'the workers'. If you want to go down this path, then life does not matter to you.

And since there's both female and male bad people, then it would make sense if some women discriminate against men, while some men against women.

So then you're a feminist who thinks that men and women are equal (literally exactly the same).

There are a lot of differences socially. Men are taught not to hit a woman, ever, regardless of the circumstances. Women are taught they they can do pretty much anything they want and blame the man. The police will believe the woman even if she's totally uninjured and the man leaves for the hospital in an ambulance. The feminist written Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) and the feminist written Duluth Model require this.

In 1996 or so feminists wrote the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) which among other things denies male DV victims recognition as DV victims and denies any resources to male DV victims. But that was not enough, some female abusers were still being arrested and feminism could not support that, so in the next VAWA re-authorization feminism changed the previous Primary Aggressor model to the feminist written Duluth Model. What is the Duluth Model you might ask?

Duluth is predicated on the "patriarchal terrorism" paradigm of partner violence. That is, men beat their female partners in order to assert masculine dominance within their relationships. Their motives are to conform to patriarchal norms and to reify a the patriarchal social/political/cultural order of male dominance and female subordination within the home.
Under this faulty model, women cannot, as a conceptual matter, perpetrate partner abuse. If they hit their male partners, it was in self defense. If they hit first, or are the only partner who hits, they are doing it within the context of "violent resistance" against presumed emotional or psychological abuse on his part.

Because the VAWA also requires mandatory arrest policies, the VAWA + Duluth literally requires police to arrest male DV victims of females.

So insofar as you are painting the issues as equal, I respectfully disagree.

Darkwolf90 · 2022-07-25T22:24:49+00:00

Sex is dichotomous in our species, creating a situation were having a bias against a sex creates a bias against the other. What you are defines what you are not and what you are not defines what you are. Unfortunately our cognition operates on bias so the only really measure is to be aware and attempt to make your bias to be more specific and less generalized. Treating people not according to the color of their skin, sex, geographical birth etc. but rather by the content of their character. The severity of negative and benevolent sexism is different depending on the culture and we are currently attempting to catch up with all the changes our tech/engineering capabilities have changed our environment.

Eedoryeong · 2022-07-26T05:48:04+00:00

I am always acutely aware that discrimination exists against women. When I was young I learned about it but it was just a kind of intellectual abstraction. But now I have skin in the game as they say. None of my contentions thst get voice in this forum detract from this basic understanding.

But years of denial /explaining away/ not being heard about very real, explicit violence against me personally and vocationally as a man, by individual women who should represent nothing but themselves but banked on the social contract and their impunity, have contributed to my PTSD as well as to real financial damages I have incurred, partly as a result of that violence, and partly as a result of having to build the machinery of my own defense, and often having no means to do so. Nowadays I am openly confrontational and articulate about double standards applied to benefit women and harass men and I have on a few occasions invoked the law.

I come from what is statistically an exceptionally nepotistic corner of the West, which also happens to be quite gynocentric in my particular work profession (i.e. men fulfilling equity quotas have lawyers on standby and have organized). After years of investing in the system, upholding the values in the law even as it was being gamed against others like myself, I no longer believe in the basic goodness of most people. When I tallied all that happened I had to sit down and make a decision what kind of a person I was going to become because it was clear that I was never going to see justice unless I created it myself I.e. a windfall for paying lawyers, or alternately vigilantism, etc.

I chose non-violence. I chose to see the undiagnosed mental illness in the cruelties of specific past detractors who happened to be women but thought that meant something to them. I am very happy now with how I cultivated a life of meaning, a fulfilling career, loving family and a chance to retire. But the list of specific unprosecuted criminals who happen to be women and need to be behind bars or pay penalties for their crimes is a mile long in my case.

Not until I got my hands on Spreading Misandry, Legalizing Misandry, and Replacing Misandry did I finally feel someone else saw what I was seeing. I wasn't invisible anymore.

After White Trash: The 400-Year Untold History of Class in America, I understood trends I'd witnessed between white feminists and those of color differently - internal fighting, ideological inconsistencies, fossils from colonialist thinking making their way into policy started to be seen in a different light. As a consequence of that, and similar readings, I see the real war in western society is not a gender or race war, but a class war. (Maybe it always has been?)

Having said that, widely known are the domestic terrorist groups populated by men targetting women. But outside of groups like this, practically invisible are the ones run by women targetting men. I'd like to change that.

This is why I advocate for 1) a federally funded men's rights organization (since the historical record shows (and some prominent feminist academics actively promote) that government funds earmarked for equality will not find their way to alleviating actual legitimate social grievances men have, if the job is to be left to existing pro-social equality NGOs - not even the UN Dept of Social and Economic Affairs "sees" men in their sustainability mandates; such mandates continually erase men from the western social profile, particularly in the lower classes, and will always remain unsustainable) and

2) a powerful litigation lobby. If you're not Johnny Depp, you're pushing a boulder uphill to get represented properly.

I think there is reason to believe that with the emergence of such an organization, vindictive loner wolf types with no resources will no longer be grown but may see an alternative to blowing up society, I.e. a place where they can be confident they will be heard and their actual injustices taken up.

We have to do this ourselves. But some government funded women's groups actively spend person-hours promoting denigration of the legitimacy of such men's claims. These organizations need to be outed, shamed and defunded.

But all of that takes infrastructure.

Basketballjuice · 2022-07-25T17:31:27+00:00

I believe that it all has to do with traditionalism - you'll see that men's oppression mostly has to do with being stoic and expendable, whereas women's oppression usually has to do with modesty and caretaking.

windsquid1993 · 2022-07-26T00:43:41+00:00

Go to YouTube and search "the red pill (2017)" it's a documentary made by a women called cassie Jay. It will give you a good start

Temporary_Spend_3111 · 2022-07-26T05:26:27+00:00

Equality of opportunity is what i advocate. It doesnt matter what race gender sex or sexual orientation you are. I dont care what culture your from or any of that. If your able to do the job and your the most qualified to do it. Then you should have said opportunity.

That being said i also dont think anyone should be discriminated against legally. We cant look at skewed statistics and use that to justify discrimination.

KingOfTheIVIaskerade · 2022-07-26T17:24:58+00:00

Men and women face different pressures, and those pressures need specific advocates against because a general approach doesn't always work.

It's ok to be a feminist and advocate for women, as long as you don't also claim to be advocating for men or try and shut down male advocates.

I think what really grinds a lot of men's gears is when feminists come in and try and shut something down that doesn't even make sense - intactivism, for example, is often shouted down despite a ban on male genital mutilation not negatively affecting women at all (and in fact potentially being quite postitive).
The problem is that there's a self-reinforcing circular narrative here. All forms of FGM are banned, while one form of MGM (circumcision) is still legal. There's no good reason for this to be the case, but the fact that i'ts legal leads many people to believe that there must be a reason for it to be legal, otherwise it would have been banned. There's also the narrative that FGM is this horrific crime against humanity (which it is), while circumcision is harmless (it's not) and so trying to change genital mutilation laws to include circumcision is equating something harmless with a horrible thing, rather than accepting that circumcision is also bad.
There's also the narrative that FGM and MGM aren't comparable, even though that's ridiculous because they absolutely are. What's not comparable is the most well-known form of FGM that involves cutting out the entire clitoris, but again, all forms of FGM are banned - pricking the clitoris with a pin as a symbolic ritual gesture carries the same punishment as cutting a girl's clit out and sewing her vulva shut. These are comparable to forms of MGM that include penile cutting, circumcision (did you know women can be circumcised too? The removal of the clitoral hood is literally directly comparable to circumcision of the penis. Guess which one is heavily punished and which is allowed), and castration.
But any attempt to talk about this is pre-emptively shut down as "you hate women why do you try and compare circumcision to actually harmful FGM you just want to legalise FGM you awful misogynist" which understandably makes intactivists a little bitter when feminists then turn around and tell everyone that they totally advocate for men too, what we need to do is just keep giving women whatever they ask for and that'll somehow help men not lose vital bits of their anatomy at birth no we don't know how it'll do that it just will ok.

Virtually no MRAs want to curtail womens' rights. Virtually no MRAs think that it's a zero-sum game. They want everyone to have as much freedom to live as they want as they can, they're just focused on men, and are happy for feminists to focus on women as long as they don't try and shut MRAs down.

Effective-Help-7353 · 2022-07-25T19:30:22+00:00

I enjoyed your take on this topic OP, it's very level-headed. A couple of the comments on the post prove that sexism on an individual basis is often rooted in painful experiences. Even if we did reach a point where all laws everywhere were completely egalitarian, as long as there are women hurting men and men hurting women, there will always be new sexist people being made. We'll never eradicate sexism entirely, but I do hope we reach a point where it's not "state-sponsored" against either sex.

Flashy-Category-8069 · 2022-07-25T18:47:28+00:00

Yea at this point the world is fucked

beam_me_up_scott · 2022-07-26T00:58:34+00:00

I'm a woman and I think this is spot on! I'd also like to add that sometimes sexism/gender rules detriment BOTH sides. I think parental rights is a really good example. Outdated and sexist ideas of motherhood being somehow more valid/sacred than fatherhood means that the burden of childcare is disproportionately on women and culturally expected of us, and ALSO that men don't get fair parental rights in divorce or fair paternity leave. Both sides are getting absolutely screwed and it's awful. This is obviously not true for everything, but I think it is a lot of the time -- another example is how women are dismissed as overly emotional and irrational, whereas men are ridiculed and shunned for expressing basic emotions. Two sides of the same shitty coin. The best way to benefit both men and women is to work together to dismantle this bullshit!

Ko_oK_24685 · 2022-07-26T10:03:15+00:00

Misandry is mostly perpetrated in more "developed" countries by "feminists" fighting against propped up straw men.

The wage gap is a great example, feminists claim women are paid less than men on average, which is true, but there are several reasons for this including men tend to work longer hours, retire at later ages, are more likely to ask for raises and negotiate a higher salary, not to mention working on the more dangerous jobs such as construction by a vast margin.

Reddit1984Censorship · 2022-07-26T10:31:08+00:00

That assesment is blind to the actual political social forces currently driving our society.
Individuals sure theres all kind of individuals of both genders with all kinds of intentions that goes without saying, thats obvious.
The difference is in the actual political forces, feminism is institutionalizing the gaslight and hatred of men across all the institutions of our society, while there is not such thing as ''Meninism'' doing anything of the sort.
So forget about individuals thats not what we are discussing here, we are discussing political and social forces.
The problem is not individual women or men, the problem is one sided biased unaccountable feminism taking away men rights across the board through their ''patriarchy'' narrative wich will always justify hurting men for the sake of women while preaching equality on the same breath.
And this is not ''simmetrical'' to what feminism says about us because feminism blames ''men'' for the opression of women, while we dont blame women we blame the political force/ideology called feminism wich includes both men and women as its members.

Here is some graphical examples:
A feminist in a position of power blockign the adressal of men issues
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRWUsn4yyJI&ab_channel=DailyMail
Feminism using quotas for women, but when men become the miniority, all of the sudden qutoas are bad
https://www.reddit.com/r/Egalitarianism/comments/obt8wk/comment/h3qp0fo/
Google on of the top most porwerfull corporatiosn of the world infested with feminism
(I installed duckduckgo so i wouldnt see the google logos anymore its too insulting)
https://www.google.com.ar/search?q=google+men+day+vs+women+day&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwilz_uhrJb5AhUSOLkGHY2OAWAQ2-cCegQIABAA&oq=google+men+day+vs+women+day&gs_lcp=CgNpbWcQAzIGCAAQHhAIUMcDWMcDYOAHaABwAHgAgAFNiAGTAZIBATKYAQCgAQGqAQtnd3Mtd2l6LWltZ8ABAQ&sclient=img&ei=48HfYuXRE5Lw5OUPjZ2GgAY&bih=938&biw=1920#imgrc=SsosNYvVd4mboM&imgdii=sH74WiCeZP8NRM
And of course reddit itself explicitly allows the harrasment towards men (and btw the definition of being vulnerable is to not be protected so is a self contradiction on their part)
https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ozdeoi/if\_you\_are\_white\_or\_male\_you\_arnt\_protected\_under/

DavidByron2 · 2022-07-25T16:56:03+00:00

What do you guys think?

Rather than making up crimes based on thinking they ought to exist or not it seems simpler to have issues when issues arise. For example though you and many other people seem to love the idea that women face discrimination - nobody can name it. Discrimination against men is easy enough to see. Many examples on the sub. legal, institutional, societal, personal. I don't see the purpose in demanding discrimination against women exists as an abstract idea. it's like insisting there must be racism against both white and black people.

So maybe some people are just hateful and look for reasons to discriminate

Well feminists hate men, and Nazis hate Jews. These are odd behaviors though. Where they become a problem is when the rest of society decides to back the hate movement's weird behavior - which is what we see with sexism against men.

When this happens, whether in 1930s Germany of modern America, it's because the ruling class have decided that they can benefit from using the hate movement to do something else they want to do (control the working class / divide the working class). In Germany in the 1930s the socialists were near to winning power so the ruling class backed Nazis to kill the Socialists. That didn't work out great for the ruling class but it really worked out badly for the working class. In modern America the ruling class backs feminism to do much the same. Without billions of dollars in funding and the manipulation of the corporate media and ruling class politicians the feminist hate movement would not be able to survive and thrive while propagating it's hate and it's discriminatory laws.

since there's both female and male bad people

There's no such group of people as woman haters and never has been. Life isn't symmetrical always just because.

It honestly seems like life would be much better if everyone was actually equal

Better for the people on the bottom (workers, men, etc) and worse for the people on top (ruling class, women, etc). Since the people on the top generally like to keep their power, that's generally what happens. Lots of examples of feminists manipulating and lying about the scientific and historic data on many issues (DV, rape, wages, voting) to maintain a female supremacist approach.

OliveGS · 2022-07-26T02:34:26+00:00

Have you been to those other parts of the world or lived in other cultures?

BrosenOne · 2022-07-26T03:07:08+00:00

OP what most vulgar oppression do you think men face in the United States?

Fearless-File-3625 · 2022-07-25T18:10:53+00:00

Misandry is in every country, misogyny is only in select few countries.

AnonymousNeko2828 · 2022-07-25T18:45:27+00:00

[permanently deleted]

digos_ · 2022-07-26T02:15:05+00:00

I literally only have to read the first two sentences to see that your actually starting to see the reality of the world…it doesn’t matter how you say it the wow world is sexist, the real world oppresses, the real world favors men, the real world favors women…we are different and that apply a in many ways good or bad and that’s the reality pros and cons baby. This is a concept feminist can’t/don’t understand

TheManlySebby · 2022-07-26T04:26:18+00:00

I definitely agree, there are different things each gender has to deal with in life which shouldn't be something they have to deal with. I guess in a way that makes them both equal? Still fucked up with how they're treated in certain parts of the world/aspects of life.

rabel111 · 2022-07-26T05:33:25+00:00

Sums it up.

2022-07-26T05:52:54+00:00

I agree

OpinionatedDad · 2022-07-26T15:02:05+00:00

I strongly believe generalization based on genitals is extremely backwards.

shadowwalker989 · 2022-07-26T17:09:25+00:00

Problems stem from leadership (or anyone in a position of power) hence the hate towards one another as those in positions such as that take sides, the tube station I get off at has a poster saying MEN need to look in the mirror as often they don't know they are being abusive, bare in mind this poster went up around the time Amber heard was a proven abuser the same poster message was circulating for a shortwhile on the tubes during MEN'S mental health week. Actions such as these cause the problems if not make them worse

Stereotypes are very harmful but some stick for a reason (this one's going to get alot of hate bk for) such as "its okay for a man to sleep around but not a women" the first part is false in my eyes as ppl shldnt be sleeping around period HOWEVER the reason behind the negativity of women sleeping around is because women control the flow of consensual sex "but a man can so no too" yh that gets him labelled every negative slanderous Stereotype out there but if a women says no she's a strong smart women this leads to the understanding of "its wrong for women to sleep around as its easy they just have to open their legs but a guy (unless remarkably good looking) has to put the work in to get in". There was a line from a movie I don't remember too well but it stuck because even though its not exactly hitting the nail on the head it gets the point across here "a lock that can be opened by any key is a shit lock, but, a key that can open many locks is a master key". I strongly believe its wrong either way as I believe no one should have a body count from ONS going into double digits, if you're just unlucky enough to be going relationship to relationship that's a different matter unless you're only getting in said relationships for the sex. I could rsmble on more but then this would start looking like a presidential speech lmao.

shifurc · 2022-07-25T19:09:54+00:00

As Jordan Peterson explains, the world has always been shit for both genders, just in different ways. But prior to Critical Theory, the two genders were trying to help one another out. After "2nd wave" or "radical" feminism got started, as a form of counterculture cultural Marxist attack on diffuse "patriarchy" women were taught that men as toxic, violent, brutish fat idiots.And it's in marriage /relationship therapy books as well.Here's the irony, feminism has hurt women MORE than men, and kids most of all.MRA is merely an attempt to demand equal treatment before the law. It was what men convinced other men there should be. Women were granted that and immediately began demanding for special considerations, invading male-created spaces, attacking men in less than equitable manners, taking over courts, creating family courts to enable their power, grabbing various forms of welfare and are now even going as far as to demand non-related "fathers" pay for their many kids of other "baby daddies"Oh, and all the while abusing and hitting men, taking advantage of criminal justice system bias and violence, and expecting men - who are biologically designed to fight - to not fight back or it is "toxic" and "misogyny."Kinda hard to sell equality if when women get equality they crap all over it, prop up systems that help them alone, eliminate equality, and then actually physically attack men (and boys, by the way).I appreciate that you've come in here hoping to create a bridge or extend an olive branch. But remember we are not responsible for our ancestors, that's God's department. Which means that the account, as far as I am concerned, in this life, is not REMOTELY even.Aside from Bear Grylls Season 2 I recommend women also watch a video on Survivor where women manipulate men into giving up the chicken they won fair and square, using their female wiles and cooing and looks, and the fact that the "system" (the camera) was on them to judge them.If I ever get on an Island with women I am instituting real patriarchy immediately. If you don't do what you are told, good luck eating and getting water. God did not make us physically equal. And by far men created modernity. Almost all your hygiene products, and improvements on life are due to men. And IMO women everywhere have lost their minds if they think they can be overweight baby-killers that sleep with lots of men and be desirable as wives. That might work on weak males, but frankly, the bible had it right"It is better to live in the desert alone than in a wide house with a brawling woman."If women cannot respect the advantage, and disadvantage, of men, having men, and testosterone in general, maybe they should huddle up and realize how badly feminism has hurt them and find balance. Kind of ironic that women think they are more balanced, when all we see these days are unhinged females (Karens) who won't get out of Ubers or act racist in public, or whatever. We've always known some men turn to evil. Good men want to kill those rat bastards. But we THOUGHT women were our allies. We changed a lot of tradition to try out this experiment, and some of us even tried female majority owned businesses (don't do it, it's a disaster. They fight each other). And now we are DEMANDING equal treatment before the law. Or Atlas WILL shrug.

ArcturasMooCow · 2022-07-25T22:08:22+00:00

Women don't want equality, not really. Women want what they want and when they want it. Modern women don't just any man, they want the fantasy ideal man that dwells in their head.

Women choose, men settle.

If a lot of women end up passing away alone, then they are achieving the equality that men have endured for years.

🐮

ChudBuck · 2022-07-26T01:27:32+00:00

Wrong subreddit, you have to go back to twox

Greg_W_Allan · 2022-07-26T04:10:54+00:00

It honestly seems like life would be much better if everyone was actually equal

That's a dangerous notion.

Forsaken_Mode_2173 · 2022-07-25T22:03:05+00:00

Jesus Christ...
"...I've been considering that maybe both genders are oppressed in different parts of the world and aspects of life."

You are slow as hell.

Title	Question
Author	AnonymousNeko2828
Upvotes	150
Comments	242
Date	July 25, 2022 4:40 PM UTC (4 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/w7tnj0/question/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/question.1209279 https://theredarchive.com/post/1209279

Comments

Let this sink in: I've figured that Rwanda genocide was about killing exclusively men only after one Rwandan lady complained that after genocide, 70% of the population are women and they are struggling with finding partners.