~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
kelloo
[removed]
[–]half-human79 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Well let's not forget that a lot of women did work really hard on the homefront of the war effort.
However, it's not in the least bit surprising that the photogenic, lily-white, probably quite affluent woman who made it onto the poster couldn't hack it. Those uncommon women who actually do hard manual labor don't usually look like models. They look like someone who works for a living, and that doesn't make a good recruitment poster.
[–]OThomson30 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
and also remember that in WW1 (atleast i know for certain in WW1) safety standards in factories IMPROVED while women were working in them due to the public backlash at how many were being injured.
[–]PerniciousOne7 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Still working in the factories was much, much safer than being in the trenches in the war. My grandfather suffered greatly in the war, living in the trenches.
[–]giegerwasright5 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
He's saying that nobody gave a fuck about safety standards in factories when they were populated by men.
[–]PerniciousOne1 point 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Still the chance of machinery smashing you is less than a bullet hitting you. Even with the injuries, you typically had a chance of surviving.
My grandfather watched people die from minor infections.
[–]gkx-1 point 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Yeah, but how much did his wife suffer? /s
[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics3 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
According to Hillary far more because she had to worry about him.
[–]half-human1 point 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I believe it.
[–][deleted]61 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
At least she did it for a week. All this time I just thought she was a model.
[–]Miracle_Fruit31 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Indeed. Not sure how it's news that the people depicted in promotional posters are not always exactly what they are portraying.
[–][deleted]22 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I hope no one ever finds out Uncle Ben doesn't actually make all the rice...
[–]ls1z28chris12 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Please tell me Aunt Jemima makes the syrup...
[–]Just_Brad11 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Word. This proves jack shit and harmed no-one.
[–][deleted]49 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Who fucking cares? She wanted to quit a dangerous job and become a cellist, and I say good for her. That sounds pretty sensible to me.
[–]ls1z28chris0 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The point is that men didn't have a choice. They were conscripted.
[–]marauding-lunatic-7 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
It wasn't just a job. The US was in total war at the time and people back home were expected to contribute to the war efforts as well. I'm sure most of the men overseas would have preferred a factory job over death, dismemberment, and disease.
[–]funnyfaceking-17 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
the families of the soldiers who were killed because they didn't have enough supplies might care
[–]reinventingmyself34 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
...while many other women stayed in that sort of dangerous job to support the war effort. Is it really that much a surprise that the image was mere wartime propaganda?
[–]Tetzel17 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
It was also only used in one company (Westinghouse Electric) and wasn't actually released to the general public (it was rediscovered in the 1980's). The woman also may NOT have been the model for it, and she was unaware until later in life that she MAY have been the inspiration. Shitty post.
[–]IStandUpForYou24 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
This is pretty ridiculous, this isn't harming our rights. You are just poking fun
[–]funnyfaceking-3 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The Men's Rights subreddit is a place for those who wish to discuss men's rights and the ways said rights are infringed upon.
the subreddit is not just a place to discuss how things are harming men's rights
[–]giegerwasright-4 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
No. He's pointing out hypocrisy.
[–]misingnoglic22 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
This is stupid, who cares?
[–]AlexthePwner18 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
And this is pertinent to the rights of men in what way?
the propaganda says "women can do whatever men can do, often better", but not in this case
[–]ManhattanT59 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
By "in this case", do you mean this specific incident involving Geraldine Hoff? One person? You take this one example as compelling evidence to falsify the claim that women in general can perform at the same level as men?
[–]cl3ft5 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Ouch my rights.
[–]funnyfaceking0 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
it's
not
The Men's Rights subreddit is a place for those who wish to discuss the ways men's rights are infringed upon.
[–]andreipmbcn1 point 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I support you in this. When women lie about their moral aptitudes (i.e. earning what they want as opposed to complaining about it until they get it) they can demand many more "rights" than are actually warranted for them, while subtly urging everyone to ignore the obligations they should associate with these rights.
[–]CameronNemo16 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I have little patience for imgur links, and this one just seemed to bash a single woman for something that happened last century. This is not relevant to men's rights and I do not want this to be the face of /r/MensRights.
[–]cl3ft6 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Hear hear.
[–]randallfromnb9 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I was under the impression that she didn't even know that her image was being used in posters until about 20 years later. Am I wrong?
[–]Halflife3608 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I don't understand how this is men's rights. Seems more like bashing other people to me.
[–]funnyfaceking-5 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
read some of the other comments
[–]Halflife3607 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Ya, I see a lot of people saying this doesn't belong here either.
none of them say why
look at the ones who say other things
It doesn't belong here because bashing a gender doesn't give men more rights. This has nothing to do with men's rights.
[–]funnyfaceking-2 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
it's not bashing a gender
it's exposing a propaganda poster that has a very strong myth attached to it
how is it bashing a gender?
[–]littlethistle4 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
actually, according to Wikipedia, she left due to an injury in the workplace.
which is contrary to what this childish picture says. and it even links to Wikipedia!
[–][deleted]1 point 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Where does it say that?
[–]funnyfaceking1 point 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
it doesn't
wikipedia, and the source cited by wikipedia, say that she left because she "feared" an arm injury would cause problems for her cello playing
what injury is that?
the wikipedia i read says she feared a hand injury
[–]Halflife3602 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
And the propaganda is that women can do things?
not all women can
[–][deleted]5 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Neither can all men.
obviously
[–]MrWhat47 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
What's wrong with being a cellist? Some would say that the arts are just as important to our humanity as civil rights are.
[–][deleted]6 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
These were propaganda images at the time, and they've been reappropriated by feminsts for their own propaganda. It's important to be able to recognize the agenda.
http://www.the-spearhead.com/2011/12/16/famous-pearl-harbor-female-firefighter-photo-a-fraud/
[–]TracyMorganFreeman5 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
And she married(a dentist I believe) soonafter, outliving her husband.
[–]cl3ft4 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
TIL it took a week to take a photo in the 1930s.
[–]littlethistle3 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
she actually left due to an injury.
[–]TracyMorganFreeman0 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Fear of injury =\=injury
[–]oneiorosgrip3 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
One point on this - Rosie the Riveter never would have been a thing if not for a combination of unrelated factors.
The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 established 44 hour week, (revised to 40 in 1940) so in production, the same amount of product required the effort of more people.
More importantly, the act banned child labor.
It was only after that occurred that the remainder of the workforce, men, were sent to war - many drafted.
This was also happening at a time of industrial advancement, with the addition of appliances to the home which reduced the amount of time spent on household chores.
So, employers were limited in who they could hire, and how many hours they could work them... right before a huge number of men stopped earning labor wages and dropped down to military pay, then were sent overseas... and women gained the ability to spend more time away from home. Had employers been able to hire boys instead of adult women, and work them longer hours, would there have been as much work for women? Had husbands and fathers not lost income in joining or being drafted into the military, would the women in their homes have felt the need to seek employment? Had they had to go home to a set of tasks which were as involved and laborious as they had been twenty years earlier, would women have been able to take on outside work? If none of those factors had occurred, I wonder if as many women have chosen to work those longer pre-FLS Act hours, especially since they would have been competing with men and boys for those jobs.
[–]evilbrent3 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Fun fact: 8 8 8, the 24 hour day of 8 hours rest, 8 hours sleep and 8 hours work, was an Australian movement originally.
[–]oneiorosgrip1 point 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
That is interesting to know. :)
Interesting piece of US history.
[–]evilbrent1 point 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Not just Americans, goddammit!
[–]MaunaLoona1 point 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
"Democracy and freedom"
You don't seem to understand what those words mean. The two are mutually exclusive.
[–]Ek0mst0p1 point 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Apples, oranges
[–]kaosethema1 point 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
What does this have to do with Men's Rights?
[–]PsychologicalClass351 point 3 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Fun fact: Naomi Fraley was the real woman in the photo and Geraldine hoff has been mistakenly credited as the model in the poster. Just in case anyone cares about facts
[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics-1 point 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Sure would be a shame if a war related injury cut her career short.
She made a logical decision.
A decision she was allowed to make because she was a woman. Millions of men would have done the same . . . if given the choice.
But no, women are always the primary victims of war.
oh boy, i just posted this on tumblr
i think a lot of shit is about to hit the fan
[–]AryoBarzan-2 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Oh, the irony :)
[–]Nepene-3 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Another strong message that a lot of women prefer softer jobs to more dangerous ones, including very famous feminist icons. Those who do more dangerous jobs should as such be rewarded with better pay even if they are male.
[–]MooseFlyer5 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You mean, a strong message that a particular woman preferred a "softer job". I'd prefer to be a cellist too. And I have a dick! Shocking, I know.
[–]Nepene0 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Interesting. Since you believe your preferences are relevant disproving my argument, what is your current job and what past jobs have you held?
[–]MooseFlyer2 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I've been an intern at a theatre company; that's all.
My preferences are only relevant in the sense of my point that preferring "soft jobs" has to do with personality and socialization, not gender.
[–]Nepene1 point 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Preference of jobs often has to do with a need for money if you are male. Men tend to work more dangerous jobs and work further from home and avoid soft jobs as the soft jobs don't pay well enough. You can see this in statistics, hence my original comment.
If all you have done is be an intern I doubt you have the experience to say whether you would do a soft or a hard job in the future, or to comment well on this issue.
Women don't need money?
Less generally, as men tend to work for women to supply money. Some need money more, but you don't find many women metal workers.
I think my point here is that men "work for women to supply money" because it's what society expects, and that women don't do the same because it's not what society expects. There's nothing (or little, at least) inherent in either gender that makes them chose to do a certain kind of work.
True, and as of now feminism is working to ensure that men who work harder to get money are paid equal wages to women who don't work as hard with their pay gap myths. I am opposed to that. I am not saying that women could not work hard if they wanted to.
[–]MooseFlyer1 point 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The pay gap being a myth is thrown around here a lot, but I've never seen the evidence. Care to link me?
http://www.examiner.com/article/obama-s-gender-pay-gap-is-myth-it-s-just-not-true-experts-say
Sure.
[–][deleted]-4 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The posterchild of Grrl power didn't last more than a fucking week.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]half-human79 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]OThomson30 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]PerniciousOne7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]giegerwasright5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]PerniciousOne1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]gkx-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]half-human1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]61 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Miracle_Fruit31 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]22 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ls1z28chris12 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Just_Brad11 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]49 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ls1z28chris0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]marauding-lunatic-7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]funnyfaceking-17 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]reinventingmyself34 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Tetzel17 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]IStandUpForYou24 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]funnyfaceking-3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]giegerwasright-4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]misingnoglic22 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]AlexthePwner18 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]funnyfaceking-3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ManhattanT59 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]cl3ft5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]funnyfaceking0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]andreipmbcn1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]CameronNemo16 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]cl3ft6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]randallfromnb9 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Halflife3608 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]funnyfaceking-5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Halflife3607 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]funnyfaceking-3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Halflife3607 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]funnyfaceking-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]littlethistle4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]funnyfaceking1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]funnyfaceking0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Halflife3602 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]funnyfaceking-3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]funnyfaceking0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]MrWhat47 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TracyMorganFreeman5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]cl3ft4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]littlethistle3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TracyMorganFreeman0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]oneiorosgrip3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]evilbrent3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]oneiorosgrip1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]evilbrent1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]MaunaLoona1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Ek0mst0p1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]kaosethema1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]PsychologicalClass351 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]funnyfaceking-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]AryoBarzan-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Nepene-3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]MooseFlyer5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Nepene0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]MooseFlyer2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Nepene1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]MooseFlyer2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Nepene0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]MooseFlyer2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Nepene1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]MooseFlyer1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Nepene1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]-4 points [recovered] | Copy Link