Men will never resolve our own problems because most of us have some level of Masochistic Personality Disorder

It's often brought up that women banded together to solve problems that adversely affected them, and that men should do the same. At first glance this seems entirely reasonable - however, this crumbles when you consider that women by and large have an ingroup bias while men have the polar opposite (termed "male disposability" in circles such as these).

Just about every man can recall their mother conditioning them to treat every woman like a spoiled princess (under the guise of being a “real man” or “gentleman”), and the majority of men adhere to this for some seemingly inexplicable reason.  Even incel dweebs center their entire identity around their inability to meet women’s approval.  Men could put a stop to this, but they don’t – quite the contrary, they are the foremost proponents of female supremacy.  Why is that?

Masochistic Personality Disorder, also known as Self-Defeating Personality Disorder) is considered by much of psychiatry to be outdated (the last time it was included in the DSM as a formal diagnosis was in 1980). Note: This is not to be confused with sexual masochism, though the terms clearly share an etymology.

Some of the defining traits pertinent to this discussion include:

·       chooses people and situations that lead to disappointment, failure, or mistreatment even when better options are clearly available

·       rejects or renders ineffective the attempts of others to help them

·       rejects opportunities for pleasure, or is reluctant to acknowledge enjoying themselves (despite having adequate social skills and the capacity for pleasure)

·       engages in excessive self-sacrifice that is unsolicited by the intended recipients of the sacrifice

This explains why both liberals and conservatives by and large support female supremacy, albeit they have different ways of going about it.  Socially progressive men will openly advocate for destructive ideas toward men - "believe women", women-only scholarships (even as men are a minority of college enrollees/graduates) and business grants, fighting a phony "wage gap", you know the drill.

Socially traditional men, despite being accused of being raging sexists, by and large consider men to be women's servants, army, ATM and punching bag.  This goes beyond just their significant others to women as a whole.  They're the first ones to oppose women being conscripted (and they're right, but neither should men) while condoning women raping underage boys.  They have rightly been condemned for opposing abortion rights, but in no way does this even remotely benefit men (quite the contrary) - and they sure as hell don't support men's "financial abortion" option.

This is aptly displayed when it comes to politics, where (at least in the US) no prominent politician would say, let alone advocate, anything pro-male. Even as Republicans continue to openly embrace white identity politics (and borderline white supremacy), they won't touch men's issues with a ten foot pole. The closest they came was undoing parts of Title IX that basically eliminated the burden of proof from rape accusations on college campuses, which is good, but affects less than 1% of men at most.  Of course, this doesn’t even compare to the damage done primarily to men by Trump’s ICE gestapo raids and reckless warmongering.

So why do male issues remain a third rail?  Simple – because the vast majority of men agree with women being treated better than men both socially and legally.  In my experience, there are significantly more men that support female supremacy than women.  No other group in the history of the world behaves in such a universally self-destructive manner, and the few women who openly advocate against their gender’s interests (Ann Coulter, Megyn Kelly, etc.) are castigated by women in general.