TL:DR, the wall only matters when men have standards.

Seems like a regular parable around the redpill/manosphere nowadays.

It goes like this: Female bangs every thug dick in sight between ages of 14 and 28 and lies like a rug about it the whole time. Decides to marry a beta at 29. Divorces him at 35 or so, shrivels up,loses her looks, and becomes a penniless cat herder until she dies alone of dementia.

That's a nice story of karmic justice which may happen occasionally. On the meta level however, it's bullshit.

Here's what I see in the field. Dudes are so AFC thirsty dating a single mom isn't just taboo, it's actually expected now. That shit blew my mind recently when I got bachelor shamed for having standards recently. While such flak is to be expected when one is over the target , the fact I got flamed for declining an LTR with ex military single mom sporting two kids is very new.

Fatties, older women, categories once considered undateable now have no trouble landing men. The married hambeast at my job has a single dude of average SMV orbiting her, and older women routinely assume I'm DTF them. Put simply the "Wall" may as well not exist anymore. We here may have standards, but there's so few males who do today that our population fits into a statistical error margin.

In this matriarchy, a female who can lie well enough (as in most of them) can not only still pull easy dick well into her 30s , but also have little trouble finding a beta doormat even at that age. If she goes to the gym and actually uses the equipment instead of her Instagram , a female may not ever hit "the wall" regardless of age - a fit older woman who skips booze and drugs can hold her own in the looks department against the army of fat younger girls now occupying the average.

The effect is so pronounced I'm noticing a trend now of younger women not even bothering with having betas anymore; between The Government, her family, and her orbiters she doesn't remotely need a boyfriend. After a decade or so of taking in more dicks then US Military Recruit Processing , she might decide to get monogamous for the sake of social favor or if she falls on hard financial times . The Wall? Get serious. By the time she's old enough to remotely worry about it the only guys masculine enough to give a damn will be AARP eligable.

On the flip side I've encountered plenty of older women stacking alimony and CS checks from multiple relationships who are banging younger males ,and have no trouble attracting them. These women aren't alone because they can't attract dudes for an LTR.They're "alone" because they don't give a damn about a Betabux when they already got their payday. Typically they punched out Chads baby 10+ years ago as a single mom ,or they dragged him to the altar long enough to divorce him and repeat the process. By now they're long past the financial need for an LTR, and they've already got kids. These women only need guys for one thing, and AFCs can't scratch that itch.

The abolition of the wall, combined with the increasing pussification of males and more transfer payments to women means well be living in a golden age of women using guys for sex. That's a good thing BTW ; no need to fret about money or dating or any of that business. Either a chick wants to fuck or there's no interaction. Alpha Fucks/Beta Bucks will switch to straight AF . Betas of the present and future will gladly accept being a chaste foot soldier in her army of orbiters.

What will NOT happen; women somehow becoming lepers due to hitting "The Wall". The term only applies when men have standards, and the lesson after my many field experiences is that we collectively don't have any.