TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

13,000 upvotes on Reddit's largest feminist subreddit downplaying men's issues and attacking MRAs for believing that misandry is real (while relying on the apex fallacy). But remember it's only fringe extremist feminists who have these views. TRUE feminists take men's issues seriously! /s

Badgerz92

August 21, 2021
237 upvotes
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
https://np.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/p896k3/men_still_run_89_of_countries_81_of_all_companies/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title 13,000 upvotes on Reddit's largest feminist subreddit downplaying men's issues and attacking MRAs for believing that misandry is real (while relying on the apex fallacy). But remember it's only fringe extremist feminists who have these views. TRUE feminists take men's issues seriously! /s
Author

Badgerz92

Upvotes 237
Comments 54
Date August 21, 2021 6:47 PM UTC
(4 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/p8wyek/13000_upvotes_on_reddits_largest_feminist/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/13000-upvotes-on-reddits-largest-feminist.1060552
https://theredarchive.com/post/1060552
Red Pill terms in post
feministmisandryMRA
Top posts by Badgerz92

Thanks in large part to support from /r/mensrights, CAFE reached their goal of $50,000 to open Toronto's first shelter for male victims of domestic abuse

5667 upvotes
January 6, 2018
/r/MensRights

HAPPY BIRTHDAY CASSIE JAYE!!!

4940 upvotes
May 1, 2017
/r/MensRights

Happy 74th Birthday Warren Farrell! Here are some of my favorite quotes of his

1632 upvotes
June 26, 2017
/r/MensRights

Men who were wrongly convicted seek to garnish the wages of the sheriff's deputies who helped put them behind bars

1611 upvotes
November 18, 2016
/r/MensRights

Man who was wrongly convicted for murder at age 14 gets exonerated after 27 years in prison.

1361 upvotes
January 6, 2019
/r/MensRights

Cassie Jaye: "If you're in Southern California, please consider attending The Red Pill screening at Cal Poly Pomona on March 5th @ 3pm. I'll be there in person for a Q&A after the screening! It's a FREE event and open to the public, hope to see you there ~"

1340 upvotes
February 28, 2018
/r/MensRights

Reminder: Cassie Jaye's 'The Red Pill' comes out online TOMORROW!!!

1338 upvotes
March 6, 2017
/r/MensRights

WE DID IT! 'The Red Pill' is the #1 documentary on Google Play!!

727 upvotes
March 9, 2017
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]Forgetaboutthelonely[M] [score hidden] 4 years ago stickied comment (82 children) | Copy Link

These men in power are not like normal everyday men, so there is no reason to assume their decision will benefit men in general

Also, Science:

  • Men lack an in-group bias based on gender
  • Men are more willing to sacrifice men than women
  • Men and women have a negative reaction to studies that show sex differences favouring men. But positive reaction for the opposite.
  • Stereotypes have changed over time and now more people think women are superior to men than the other way around.
  • Men are more likely to be altruistic to women than to men.
  • People are particularly concerned when men are violent to women.
  • People are less concerned about male suffering
  • Male and female adolescents feel more empathy for female peers.
  • People are more supportive of women in male-dominated professions than vice versa.
  • People who classify groups as oppressed and privileged cannot make unbiased judgements about privileged groups even when they think they should.
  • People underestimate men's support for women.
  • Male victims of sexual coercion against men is not taken as seriously as against women
  • Male sexual harassment victims are viewed as suffering less than female victims.
  • People don't like affirmative action but especially for men.
  • Female chatbots are seen as more human than male ones
  • Male teachers who have sexual relations with students judged more harshly than female ones.
  • Both men and women are against double standards that favour men, but support some double standards that favour women.

People think men favour double standards that favour men but they don't.

[–]gratis_eekhoorn 90 points91 points92 points 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

It's technically not even a feminist subreddit it's just a subreddit for women that has over 13 million members but hey the problem is only a tiny group of radical feminists right? /s

[–]a-man-from-earthleft-wing male advocate 27 points28 points29 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The awkward turtle is a mod there. Do we need to say more?

[–]gratis_eekhoorn 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

the awkward turtle is a mod in pretty much every big subreddit

[–]Badgerz92[S] 68 points69 points70 points 4 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link

There's a comment in there plugging MensLib because they don't "try to claim mens issues are as equal or valuable as womens issues"

Do we still have MensLib supporters in this sub? Do their mods still lurk here? How can they claim that feminism takes men's issues seriously when their own supporters are the feminists who don't take men's issues seriously?

[–]Unit_08 49 points50 points51 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

LOL what a resounding endorsement for a men's issues sub. Imagine a subreddit for any other issue where the selling point is they don't think the issue very important.

[–]PricklyGoober 41 points42 points43 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

That’s sad, because many vulnerable men get pointed in the direction of that sub, which could lead to even more self-hating. There have been good discussions there, but it must conform to the feminist narrative, which the average poster here knows how absurd that is.

[–]UnHope20 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I almost killed myself because of that sub. So can confirm that the low-key self-hatred they promote can be deadly. It's sort of scary to think of how many people were successful at ending it after falling victim to the hypnotic rhetoric.

It's a honey trap 🍯 no other way around it.

[–]PricklyGoober 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Hope you are doing much better now that you’re outta there! I was an ex-sub too, I bailed when I found this sub.

[–]UnHope20 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thanks. It is so much better here. You can actually challenge people here and not be made to feel like you've sacrificed Mother Theresa to Moloch for having your own ideas.

Glad you made it out as well. I can't even begin to think about what some of the other people still stuck in there are going through. That place is like Black Pill for left-wingers.

[–]a-man-from-earthleft-wing male advocate 21 points22 points23 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Do we still have MensLib supporters in this sub?

MensLib is the second most common sub our users also participate in: https://subredditstats.com/subreddit-user-overlaps/leftwingmaleadvocates

Do their mods still lurk here?

At least one of them still occasionally comments here.

[–]No_Divide3403 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That sub is fucking garbage. The people in there are so disingenuous.

[–]Darkkujo 61 points62 points63 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't get their stat about how most millionaires and billionaires are men, aren't most of these men married? Then their wives are millionaires and billionaires too, likely even if they divorce them like the former Mrs. Bezos and Gates. It's just like how they never want to admit they were any upper class women in any era in history who had it better than the average man.

[–]ideology_checker 20 points21 points22 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The issue is statistics its very easy to lie or mislead with statistics and what's worse its just as easy to do so unintentionally or even to oneself because for statistics to be at all accurate or representative there's just a lot of knowledge that needs to be understood and approached in a sane way before you will get sane relevant results but most people are not very statistically literate so even if every party was being honest you would get shit statistics and even more often people misusing and misreading even good statistics.

Any statistic you hear even something that you could magically know was a good statistic doesn't by itself give you useful knowledge because if you don't know the questions and assumptions that went into the study those numbers have no context and could mean the exact opposite you think it does.

[–]AmiablePenguin 39 points40 points41 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

People don't realise how genuinely sexist the mental health system/process is for men. The idea of victim blaming when we try to open up is fucking dumb horseshit.

If a woman gets sexually harassed, the last thing she wants to hear is, "it's your fault for dressing that way." Or for exposing that part of the body, or for posing suggestively, or anything.

Victim blaming doesn't help women in that scenario, how the fuck would it help men when we're trying to open up? Do these people not realise how utterly dense, braindead and dumb they're being by placing the blame on us?

First of all, how dare you? How were we as men to know the issue we're facing would last this long in the first place? No one can ever predict that. We feel guilty for having the issue, for facing it, for being a victim of it. That's our first roadblock mentally in admitting it. That it makes us less of a man, which sadly, a lot of feminists still perpetrate.

There are some days we wake up and think we're having a bad day, but it will be over tomorrow. And it sometimes is. And sometimes it isn't. Takes a little longer to clear out of the system. A few days, a week, maybe a month or two. And suddenly we wake up one day and realize it's still here. We've just blindly normalised ourselves to it in our lives. We never saw this coming, we just thought it would take time to go away.

And when we finally deem you worthy to trust you with this, the first thing you do is blame us? Seriously? You discompassionate creature. "Well you should have gone to therapy straightaway", or, "this is why men should open up more."

A problem I have with modern feminists is that they think they understand men completely and yet their conversations with us completely prove otherwise. True feminists wouldn't make it this hard in the first place, because they would actually be shocked that men can feel this way because of these things in the first place. Instead, you just want to be right to make you feel better about yourself when deep down you know haven't done anything to help. And so you shift the blame onto us so that you feel lighter.

[–]RockmanXX 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

modern feminists

True feminists

Oh please don't.

[–]helloiseeyou2020 111 points112 points113 points 4 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

Ahhh the projection

"hurdur they think we live in a matriarchy"

Nope. Youre the one insisting on tribalist absolutism with absolutely no nuance - NOT me.

Im perfectly capable of noticing that the majority of extremely negative outcomes (being homeless, assaulted, murdered, poor and without a social safety net, dying young, dying at war, dying on the job, killing yourself) happen to men ... and also noticing, for example, the abhorrent coordinated attack on abortion rights a couple years ago.

Two things can be true. Heaven forbid the thought of acknowledging that though

[–]LettuceBeGrateful 51 points52 points53 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yup, this exactly. I have NO problem acknowledging women's issues and giving them space and validation when they want to talk about it. Why are they so hell-bent on reducing men's issues to a bunch of manbabies whining about successful women?

This happened to me recently. I was talking about male rape and hadn't put down women at all, and a friend butted in to ask why I struggled to empathize with women. It's so dumb.

[–]helloiseeyou2020 35 points36 points37 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I was talking about [insert men's issue] and a friend butted in to ask why I struggled to empathize with women.

Again. Projection!

And this exactly what people like the dipshit who posted that thread in TwoX want: they want even acknowledging men having issues to become synonymous with misogyny.

You think men dying 10 years sooner than women is a problem? Why do you hate women?!

[–]peanutbutterjams 29 points30 points31 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Just outright statements that men's issues don't matter there.

And men do choose higher-paying job. People don't pay men more because they're men. WHY would they? Men don't have an in-group bias and capitalists don't voluntarily raise people's wages.

There's no rational basis to the claim.

The "women were programmers and weren't paid much until make become programmers" is disingenuous because when women were primarily programmers, it was just data entry. It wasn't anything close to the job of "programmer" today.

Finally, considering that 25,000 people died today from needless starvation, that thread is just a big pile of "I too want to exploit the global poor for profit!" without an ounce of class consciousness.

[–]Carkudo 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Employers pay more not to men, but to married men. To the benefit of the women married to those men. The glass ceiling for unmarried male professionals can just as easily be reframed as a monetary bonus for married women.

[–]peanutbutterjams 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Employers pay more not to men, but to married men.

Evidence? Unmarried men are an asset in the tech world because they'll have less problem with crunch and working crazy long hours.

[–]Carkudo 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Either you're not quite that far along in your career or your specific sector in your specific country is an outlier. The stereotype of single older men being supposedly "unreliable" is so old and widespread that I don't think I even need to provide evidence for this, and so don't have any. And if you need it, it should come up easily enough on any search engine.

[–]peanutbutterjams 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm not discounting your experience. It's just not something I can use to highlight a particular fact, if one exists.

I must be an outlier because I've never heard of this before.

[–]Carkudo 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Now that I think of it, perhaps you haven't encountered it in your field because IT has a more general ageism problem? As in, people in their late thirties and older are going to struggle, regardless of family status? If that's the case, the penalty against being an older single man could be sort of baked into that.

[–]p_and_q 25 points26 points27 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Wow! Look at that headline. “Hey look at this tiny spot on the bell curve guys! I’ve got stats!” Meanwhile for the female issues she uses all generalized statements. “Female employment is falling” “violence against women are rising”. Falling faster then men’s? Rising faster then men’s? No one should have to be the victim of violence but with that said, men are still far more likely to be physically assaulted then women. This is total bs, binary think.

[–]PricklyGoober 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Anything to fit the narrative, I guess.

[–]Badgerz92[S] 62 points63 points64 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

We keep hearing from feminists that "true feminism" takes men's issues seriously and that it's only the fringe extremists who think that misandry isn't real or that men don't have real issues. And yet we still see feminists attacking MRAs just because MRAs know that men and women both have issues and that we need to address men's and women's issues in order to have real equality.

[–]helloiseeyou2020 39 points40 points41 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The people that say that about true feminism are largely full of shit and will drop the "by other men", blame toxic masculinity, blame "patriarchy backfiring", or some other rhetorical bait and switch about which they would be happy to eDuCaTe you

For the most part, the truly reasonable feminists arent engaged in these conversations at all. Theyre the ones you meet in real life, who will listen to your points and as long as you're not just going on an anti-feminism tirade, will usually admit that you've demonstrated real problems they hadnt thought of because it doesnt affect them.

A very respectable POV tbh. Acknowledges the problem and why it was in a blind spot. No equivocation or defense of people trying to silence discussion of it

[–]TheLWMA 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

A truly reasonable feminist

Might as well be looking for a unicorns and leprechauns at that point.

[–]a-man-from-earthleft-wing male advocate 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

To be fair, these unicorn feminists do exist, e.g. Christina Hoff Sommers and Cathy Young.

[–]LettuceBeGrateful 17 points18 points19 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Men committing suicide, falling behind in school, and having fewer legal rights than women in many developed nations:

"Men are just angry at women!"

I'd say nice strawman, but unfortunately it's not just a strawman, it's an international narrative.

[–]Bergensis 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why is it always the subs that show up before you subscribe to anything that are the worst shitholes?

[–]Interesting-Bug-6048 26 points27 points28 points 4 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

"Men still run 89% of countries." That's a dog whistle, their problem is men.

Men are always expected to pay for everything. Go into any honest female only space and you'll see the majority of comments in those online places are obsessed with objectifying men based on their money, height and job, gross. It's literally men working their entire lives because that's the only way they're going to earn any sort of worth or have any value.

And, in which country are women expected to provide for their family AND their partner? What about even a %50 of cases where the woman was the provider? What country? And the partner specifically seeks 6 figures, or the guy takes the women's house and finances upon divorce? Where is that happening en masse? Is it men or women who are checking out of society and marriages because everything was made to exploit them, cause they'll lose all their money? Where do you see women advising each other not to marry at all costs, because the guy will steal all of their money upon divorce?

Who were all those people who killed themselves due to economic pressure and the meaningless of working their entire lives to be the provider, then work for a car, then work for a house and who checked out at 18-23 and wrote in their suicide notes that it was just a meaningless life of slavery and work? If anything, men are stopping other men due to competition, not you.

If you want more women to even have a reason to reach top positions maybe start with the unfair exploiting and milking of men's resources. Stealing the guy's money in divorce or simply marrying a rich guy and taking an easy way out without having to work themselves is a go-to for a certain percentage, maybe start adressing that too.

On top of that, how many women desire leadership positions and how many men desire nursing positions? They fail to realize that this is a much bigger factor than the things they're complaining about. "The successful" are not wasting their time complaining about men and going on sexist rants about how "men still run this % of countries" as if they were simply given those positions. Nobody's handing out free positions because of their gender. Sounds like this is their expectation, and is lazy as hell. They'll rush to feminism to make gender quotas just for them. What does that tell about how feminism treats women?? They're trying to force-hire women based on their gender and not merit, and congratulate the women's gender when she gets hired. This is what these people want?

For those positions you need to work for possibly decades and beat all the other competition, compete better, but no, these people have already given up. If you look in the workplace a mere accusation destroys random men's jobs and lives, you have gender quotas, HR ignores male workers' complaints about sexual harassment and fires men on command, like goddamn. These people are in it just to complain and be handed out free shit just like a crying toddler. I've been denied from literal industry positions because they only hired women, but the opposite never happens. They are as clueless as it gets.

[–]iainmf 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

"Men still run 89% of countries." That's a dog whistle, their problem is men.

Also, it's kind of misogynistic to think that women have no input in 89% of countries.

[–]Agreeable-Raspberry5 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Quite. "Head of State is male" doesn't = "there are no women in positions of authority."

[–]sakura_drop 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. Aren't women the majority demographic when it comes to voting in many places?

[+][deleted] 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Interesting-Bug-6048 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I actually didn't write that as a generalization and didn't consider it as such, because I'm saying "the women in those places" and that I wrote with those female-centric subreddits in mind. I followed one out of curiosity for a month and the majority of posts that talked about men or dating were downright obsession with those characteristics. So I meant it as one example of how bad it is (seeking rich bf or easy way out) I obviously don't apply it to the general population, but that is a strong tendency that is expressed widely only in "safe spaces" where there's no fear of judgement and obviously seen plenty in real life too. We can't ignore obvious factors just because they sound mean when you say them, but I appreciate the heads up. It could be seen that way without context I presume.

[–]a-man-from-earthleft-wing male advocate -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You originally said "any female space" so that was open to misinterpretation. And your comment did in fact get reported as rule 6 violation, but I didn't want to remove it, as you make a lot of good points.

[–]SauceBozs 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s incredibly sad how hateful they are towards men

[–]Threwaway42 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The bad faiths who posted that spammed it fucking everywhere

[–]mimiczx 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

FDS Lite

[–]hostergaard 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

There is 195 countries in the world, so about 0.000004% of men are running running countries compared to 0.0000007% of women which is a difference of 0.0000033% of which the total population of men and women are leaders of countries.

There is 2,755 billionaries around the world. 0.00006% male and 0.000009 female. A difference of 0.000051%.

Do I need to continue? Men does not rule the world. Men are not privileged. Rich people are. Powerful people are. But not men. This goes on and on for all the stats listed that are true (Most are just false, or also outright misleading, for example the STEM one exclude all the stem fields women dominates. Why? I don't know, I guess they needed to do manipulate the data to fit their narrative. If you include them there is actually more women in STEM than men. Same for the violence ones that forgets that women are actually more violent in relationships and for jobless more men actually lost jobs than women).

What they are doing here is called the apex fallacy. Looking at a tiny to the point of near non-existence group and the difference there and assuming its applicable to the population at large. If you ned to see if a society misandrist, or misgonist society you need to look at the large majority at the bottom, not the extremely tiny minority at the top. Lets do that, shall we?A quick google search tells me that there is about 100 millions people who are homeless. Of which about 80% is males. That is 80 million more male homeless than females. Something they conveniently left out in the litany of grudges, cause I guess it did not fit the narrative they wanted to push. Or to use the percentage example, rounded of 2% of men and 0.5% for a difference of 1.5%.

So you are gonna tell me, that something that affects less than a millionth of a percentage of men (and women), 0.000004%, is a important and valid indicator of privilege of men and misogyny. And that what what affects over 2 percent, 2.xxxx%, more than million times more of the male (and female) population is completely irrelevant and not a valid indicator of lack of privilege and misandry? Really?

[–]AutoModerator[M] 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Reminder everyone - Don't brigade the crossposted sub. It's against Reddit rules.

To document instances of misandry, consider these options:

1) take screenshots and upload them to Imgur
2) archive the page using a site like https://archive.vn/
3) crosspost the link to a dedicated subreddit like /r/everydaymisandry

You can also report misandry directly to the admins here.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]iainmf 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Archived: https://archive.ph/MymvU

[–]Richardsnotmyname 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Who even is the "true feminist"?

Are Swedish feminist organizations making funds for false accusers not the real feminist?

Are Indian feminist who lobbied for rape laws to exclude men not the real feminist?

Are prominent celebrities and activists online not the real feminist?

Are the feminist who lobbied the FBI to exclude men from rape statistics not the real feminist?

Are feminist social media account enabling or spreading misandry not the real feminist?

But a nobody reddit user online, are the real feminist?

[+]kitteneos -12 points-11 points-10 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Not a feminist sub.

[–]a-man-from-earthleft-wing male advocate 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not in name, but in practice.

[–]TheLWMA 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, but there's definitely a feminist overlap.

[+]Bugu4787 -11 points-10 points-9 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

If you advocate for men rights and vote democratic then you are in denial. They are the ones pushing this agenda forward. If you pay for peanuts don’t complain that you got squirrels.

[–]RockmanXX 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It was the Conservatives that successfully blocked the Equal Rights Amendment, you gotta face the facts. Neither Left or Right is interested in Men's welfare..

[–]twice_punished_jannyleft-wing male advocate 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

None of us like the democrats. They still uphold the same status quo

[+]Bugu4787 -7 points-6 points-5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You don’t realize that you are falling victim to the oldest rule in the book of politics and warfare, divide and conquer. You cannot have the cake and eat it too. The status quo will hold because of various societal reasons. Which status quo reigns is up to you, either the one that emasculate men or the one that does not.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter