Inspired by this thread here: https://www.np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1f7a58s/would_you_allow_your_daughter_to_go_to_college/

Most Redpillers claim the following about Red Pill:

  1. Red Pill is an amoral sexual & romantic praxeology (i.e. a generalized theory about/model of human sexual & romantic action and interaction) for heterosexuality.
  2. Red Pill is compatible with (perhaps even most compatible with) an ethic of genetic selfishness, of the Dawkins variety (i.e. your individual genes want to spread copies of themselves).

I want to look at the "College Sluthood Experiment" through this particular lens.

Your daughter is 50% copies of your genes. She is no less critical to your genetic self-interest than your son (whom is also 50% copies of your genes, and represents a riskier bet). Your genetic self-interest, as manifested in your daughter, is for her to be able to have lots of children that are extensively co-invested in by the father, and for her to be heavily invested into and/or able to provide for herself and/or for her to supplement external provision.

In that case, going to college sounds like a pretty good thing. For one, colleges attract elite males for your daughter. For two, if she is getting a major in something useful, colleges increase her economic resilience.

Let us also stipulate something: it is quite possible for her to conceal any promiscuous past. Whilst yes, the women who sleep-around-because-they're-mentally-ill are relatively easy to pick out, the average woman can simply ride the cock carousel and lie about her past in order to get a man. And a smart woman isn't going to be putting her "list of conquests" on social media.

The ideal outcome for her is best described as Alpha Bucks - a handsome, somewhat-older man who wants children with not just wealth already but with potential future earnings she can capture part of in the event of her electing to divorce. As long as she hides her carousel-riding and successfully outcompetes other women (which is hard), she can land one of these men, but these men are rare.

Some variety of an AFBB strategy seems to be the second-best outcome, since that way she gets to cover both of her needs and have children, and ideally she would want to deceive the Beta into raising the Alpha's child. This is also better for your own genetic self-interest as if she has sexier children, that means your gene-copies will be more likely to be passed along. The danger here is if she gets busted doing so, but if she has a college degree in something productive she can cushion the blow. Not to mention if divorce laws operate in her favor and she didn't sign a prenup that stipulates her getting nothing in the event of infidelity, she can still extract resources and send that towards the child.

Look, I know these are highly machiavellian thought experiments, but at the same time they are interesting to ponder because, for a Red Pill father who embraces genetic selfishness, is there any reason to NOT want your girl to go to college and deviate from traditional lifestyle expectations of monogamy and chastity? Isn't her behavior in your genetic self-interest?

Sure, not everyone in the pill-o-sphere embraces a genetic-selfishness view. But one has to ask why Tradcon men are seemingly happy to restrict their own female offspring from successfully reproducing and thus benefitting their own genetic competition (or are they being hypocrites?). And whilst a lot of men complain about women being sluts in college, aren't those women benefitting the men they are descended from?

So, Red Pillers, why shouldn't your daughter "have fun" in college? If she studies something productive, gets to reproduce with a genetically valuable man, and is in a position to secure a parental investment from a materially valuable man or men, where is the issue from a purely evo-psych perspective?