It's all about ratios

Electra_Cute · 2019-03-25T14:52:11+00:00

"AWALT" goes from a "useful heuristic" to a deterministic "nature", it would be great if someone could clarify it for me. What does it even mean for "AWALT to be true"?

blackedoutfast · 2019-03-25T20:08:54+00:00

AWALT means ALL women.

the issue is that BPers (incorrectly) think that when RPers say AWALT they mean that every woman is guaranteed to be a cheating whore all the time, even though that's obviously not true.

AWALT means all women have the capability of throwing away a good relationship and cheating if she crosses paths with the wrong guy in the wrong situation at the wrong time. AWALT doesn't mean that all women will cheat on you, it means that any woman could cheat on you.

AWALT is a warning to MEN to not think that one particular woman is a perfect unicorn who would never cheat, that they shouldn't blindly trust her when she does something suspicious.

but women are so fucking solipsistic and self-centered that they are incapable of understanding that AWALT is a message for men, and women assume that AWALT is intended as an insult toward them and get all butthurt and emotionally triggered whenever they read it.

sublimemongrel · 2019-03-25T14:43:18+00:00

Some red pillers take AWALT literally as in all women will do xyz, others do not, and use it as a heuristic and/or a maxim about “female nature,” but not necessarily a given. So it really depends on who you ask. I will say that even the ones who use it to describe “female nature” tend to be more absolute when it comes to certain principles. Like hypergamy (which itself is also not a consistently defined term). They’d probably say all women are more literally hypergamic (again, what exactly they mean by that is up for interpretation when you get down to the specifics), but that it may manifest differently in behaviors.

If you are just asking something general, like how many women do you believe are “hypergamic, manipulative and employ AF/BB” or something than I would say the percentages will be all over the place. There likely won’t be much consistency.

diffdedbed · 2019-03-25T14:52:36+00:00

I think a key difference is a BP will say people are just individuals while ignoring our genetic natures.

RP tends to take women as automations who are unwilling slaves to their natures.

We might well be slaves to our natures, but there is more than once successful mating strategy. Dawkins did some good explanations of this with game theory in the 70's.

stats135 · 2019-03-25T15:11:16+00:00

The ratio that matters is that more woman like RP than men who are RP. Think of the rock star stereotype. Maybe only a small faction of woman want to fuck them or even know who they are, but rock stars can still have threesomes every night because there's only one rock star for every thousand woman that want to fuck one.

It doesn't matter if the ratio is 80/20 for woman who like BP/beta vs RP/alpha men, if the ratio of beta/alpha men is 90/10. Being one of the 10 alpha men that 20 woman are attracted to gives every alpha an average of 2 woman, while being one of 90 men that only 80 woman are attracted to means you have to compete and have about a 10% chance of being left out.

douchebag_throwaway3 · 2019-03-25T16:26:40+00:00

AWALT should be in the dictionary as the definition of motte/bailey.

It's "AWALT is just a heuristic... Of COURSE nobody REALLY means ALL walt. Duh" when arguing with blues.

But as a red, if I dare say my wife isn't like that, I'm suddenly lambasted with, "fucking cuck. ALLLLLLLL WALT!!! Your wife isn't some special unicorn. Have fun when she fucks 20 alphas behind your back and you're raising their kids."

It's quite maddening.

Just go to MRP and dare to say your wife is a unicorn.

AutoModerator · 2019-03-25T14:01:54+00:00

Attention!

You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.
For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.
If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.
OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

DXBrigade · 2019-03-25T20:49:17+00:00

Only RP Believe in AWALT. By the way saying that only 90 % of women are AWALT is nonsense. AWALT means ALL Women Are Like That.

insultin_crayon · 2019-03-26T00:23:11+00:00

What is the percentage of AMALT?

[deleted] · 2019-03-26T02:27:30+00:00

The RP posters here are male biased and the blue pill ones pretend to be gender neutral, but in a gynocentric man-hating world that amounts to being biased in favor of women.

Purple pill = master race, balance has been brought to the force.

I view all of this as a hegelian dialectic. The patriarchal world was actual male dominated. Feminism rebelled against that, and still harbors intense residual anger against men despite few of them having been born in actual patriarchal times. TRP is a reaction to the new, insidiously gynocentric and feminine imperative-serving status quo. Bluepill is a reaction to that, and Purple pill is a reaction to that.

At the end of everything is the blackpill, anime waifu body pillows, and eventual sexbots and avoidance of the other gender, and humanity in general. Utter nihilism and escapism is the end of socio-sexual history.

LeJacquelope · 2019-03-26T04:57:11+00:00

I would say that redpill guys believe that AWALT is true for >90% of women ( I give a 10% for the women that can be like that but for all intents and purposes don't manifest that behavior in their lives)

Wrong, TRP believes AWALT=100% of women. I've called them on that on this subreddit in multiple threads - including a few that I've made - and they overwhelmingly said ALL women are hypergamic.

sadomasochrist · 2019-03-25T14:53:10+00:00

AWALT is literal. When you say "NAWALT" you're saying essentially that "evolution\self interest doesn't apply to this woman."

mummycummies · 2019-03-25T15:10:06+00:00

The problem with RP men is they don't get to know her for her, ya know? If you can figure out how she ticks, you can get (and keep!) her naked.

Workaholico · 2019-03-25T19:10:13+00:00

Actually, it is a correct definition but it is incorrect in some assumptions for both TBP, TPP and unfortunately TRP. And the freaking name is also a headache.

All Women Are Like That or AWALT is about the aggregate of women's behavior in the market.

What do I mean by women's aggregate? If you sum up any woman's behavior in the market, from their ONS to their first and last love, you get a list of all things she did in the sexual/relationship market. That's an individual's aggregate. Now sum up the list of all women. You get a full market worth of behaviors.

This ginormous list of behaviors have some things in common, as anyone who understand the central limit theorem will tell you. And thus you could make a list of the "behaviors most repeated". These highly repeated behaviors which would define some of the best predictions and bases for decision making as they would have the heaviest weight in the overall group decision. These are the behaviors in the AWALT definition.

Don't misunderstand.

Nor me, nor anyone would know which proportion of these behaviors is the real proportion of the overall, the "AWALT behaviors" could be 10% of the cases, it could be 90% of the cases (by my experience is around 70%). It is difficult to know without quantitative data, but you can make a rough estimate with enough qualitative ones.

Got everything until here?

Now. The the real Headache. TRP has a bad habit of giving such condescending names to their hypotheses like AWALT or CC or anything like that (Because it is a group which is always increasing, a great deal of them were in the rage phase when we defined this). AWALT is a enormous misnomer. I really wish they would change the name. Maybe maintain the acronym but make a different meaning of All women are like that. This gives people a bad impression and not a scientific one.

GamingYourMom · 2019-03-29T07:10:04+00:00

Does she bleed? She's a thot.

Five_Decades · 2019-03-25T16:52:01+00:00

It's fair.

Ted pill tactics mostly work on cluster b women, women with daddy issues, insecure women, etc.

Title	It's all about ratios
Author	TheJim66
Upvotes	9
Comments	238
Date	March 25, 2019 2:01 PM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/PurplePillDebate
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/b5b25u/its_all_about_ratios/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/PurplePillDebate/its-all-about-ratios.256610 https://theredarchive.com/post/256610

Comments