Oklahoma "accidentally" cancels feminism. "The new law prohibits public school teachers of grades K-12 from teaching eight different concepts about race, including that an individual, by virtue of his or race or sex, is inherently racist, sexist or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously."

andejoh · 2021-07-12T23:31:53+00:00

Hopefully, the war on "woke" culture ends up boosting the MRM if only by rolling back feminist positions . laws that discriminate against...

[–]TheGentlemanK 238 points239 points240 points 5 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[+]Random6oy -74 points-73 points-72 points 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

[–]Brandwein 43 points44 points45 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]ApprehensiveMail8 17 points18 points19 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]VanderBones 28 points29 points30 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Yimmy42 18 points19 points20 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]silly_little_jingle 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Dapperdan814 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]TheGentlemanK 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]hotcurrypowder 235 points236 points237 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]airgod231 26 points27 points28 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]TrilIias 261 points262 points263 points 5 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

[–]XenoX101 54 points55 points56 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I have always said "diversity" is code for "not white and male" and inherently racist/sexist. Shows quite scarily that they have gone a step further when a bill that only bans material that suggests an individual should feel guilt or discomfort because of their race or sex voids a "diversity training"'s course material. So diversity training it seems is now code not just for "not white and male", but "you suck if you are white and male". I really hope these laws don't just put a stop to this, but shed a light on how incredibly racist and sexist some of our institutions have become. This cannot go on, or we will have a race or gender war on our hands in 10-20 years, if not earlier. I think deep down governments know this and are slamming the brakes as quickly as they can to prevent another civil war.

[–]disayle32 163 points164 points165 points 5 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

[–]TrilIias 143 points144 points145 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[–]Egalitarianwhistle 75 points76 points77 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]disayle32 56 points57 points58 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Alistair_TheAlvarian 32 points33 points34 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]masterlock35 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]TrilIias 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Cerricola 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Dapperdan814 9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]conspirized -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]Dapperdan814 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]conspirized -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]TrilIias 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Believe me when I say I know how corrupt university professors and administrators can be, and they've screwed me over in serious ways on two occasions. However, they really can't touch me in any way that actually matters in the long term. I have one year left, and I have a pretty good reputation as a student. if they tried to fail me, no one would buy it, and I've built good relationships with too many professors, so I would have allies. Really, the key is just not depending on the professors for anything more than a degree. If you don't ask for more, they can only have so much power to screw you over, and I think students keep that in mind even if they aren't politically opposed to most academics.

Plus, whenever I've argued with professors, I've generally been polite (except with the director of my major, because screw her). Last fall I had a professor who I previously quite liked ask me to recommend students to participate in a competition, and I listed about 5, one women and a few men, and he asked me if I could just recommend more women. I'm not willing to dignify that. This is wrong, and he needs to know that that sort of behavior is wrong. It will continue until students stop passively accepting this absolute misandry.

[–]Historical-March-510 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]MelkorHimself 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Mario6416 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]silly_little_jingle 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]stunspot 55 points56 points57 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]DirtAndGrass 15 points16 points17 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]MBV-09-C 14 points15 points16 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]DKS6 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]ImportantResults 54 points55 points56 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]ImplementNational165 21 points22 points23 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]ApprehensiveMail8 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Double_Pickaxe_YT 64 points65 points66 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Trashbandiscoot 40 points41 points42 points 5 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[–]Historical-March-510 98 points99 points100 points 5 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

[–]Trashbandiscoot 20 points21 points22 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]-NotFBI-agent006- 52 points53 points54 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]killcat 30 points31 points32 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]-NotFBI-agent006- 12 points13 points14 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Trashbandiscoot 13 points14 points15 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]ApprehensiveMail8 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]redkiler0 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]dragonjock27 11 points12 points13 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]drtapp39 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Mythandros 40 points41 points42 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]suddenlysnowedinn 36 points37 points38 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]IronJohnMRA 12 points13 points14 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]parahacker 57 points58 points59 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]reddut_gang 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+]TheConnoissuer -50 points-49 points-48 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]parahacker 44 points45 points46 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[+]TheConnoissuer -20 points-19 points-18 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]AfraidDifficulty8 11 points12 points13 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]EvenYouBruhdah 14 points15 points16 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]MBV-09-C 11 points12 points13 points 5 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Infamous_Pay5798 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

While true the problem is that feminism in its current toxic state has permeated and infiltrated its way into many government branches and educational systems, which allows them to basically indoctrinate those gullible enough to believe their bullshit(which unfortunately includes the children), creating more toxic woke people, while labeling the straight white man as the devil and that all they are good for is being human ATMs and Sex Provider( You provide for the women whenever she wants even if you don’t, if she forces you tough shit misogynist pig). Also the same for mainstream media, social media is so feminism can stay relevant and rally a crowd of “online warriors” to cancel everyone who they want to cancel. Hollywood isn’t making an impact anyone in regards to feminism, that goes to social media influencers now, in fact Hollywood lost millions if billions of dollars listening to the woke crowd on social media when making their movies which by the way is the same group that isn’t going to go watch it at all, on top of ostracizing their fanbase at the same time. Finally news media, mainly left leaning a lot of it has a clear bias to wokeness in their writers and anchors. They can say “we’re unbiased” all they want it’s obviously a lie.

[–]reddut_gang 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Brandwein 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]DanteLivra 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]aetherjunkie 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]robk11 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]AbysmalDescent 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]hehimCA 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]TwinSong 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]blazedagamer 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Historical-March-510 10 points11 points12 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]pavlikmmm 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]ZS_1171 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

[–]suddenlysnowedinn 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]bufedad 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]suddenlysnowedinn 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]bufedad 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]suddenlysnowedinn 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]bufedad 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Historical-March-510 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

[–]Gynocentrism_Can_SMD 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Historical-March-510 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]ZS_1171 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]ZS_1171 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]Historical-March-510 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]ZS_1171 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]Historical-March-510 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]ZS_1171 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]xsplizzle 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]valintin 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+]Anih1list -6 points-5 points-4 points 5 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link

[–]reddut_gang 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]bufedad 28 points29 points30 points 5 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

[+]seraph341 -8 points-7 points-6 points 5 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

[–]bufedad 12 points13 points14 points 5 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

[+]seraph341 -7 points-6 points-5 points 5 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

[–]reddut_gang 10 points11 points12 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]seraph341 -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]reddut_gang 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Fighting and "activism" doesn't seem to be doing shit when the other millions of activists see you to be doing unnecessary activism because "what rights don't you have?" The activists telling me to "check my privilege". These activists that counter-protest our protest for equal rights. Is it really in our best interests to work with those kinds of people? We have fought, countless times. 99 percent of the time it's gets rejected, and the feminists, who are supposedly for equal rights, where were they? Oh right, pardon me, they were busy writing the 10 billionth article on why "killallmen is a justified response to male privilege".

Me, personally, I want equality. Equally fucked? Not optimal but equality is equality. It's a pick your poison type scenario I guess. Which poison is going to kill you less? Surely it's the one that doesn't advocate for your demise.

[–]bufedad 11 points12 points13 points 5 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

[+]seraph341 -8 points-7 points-6 points 5 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[–]bufedad 9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

You know what line of thought describes men as sex hungry people who always want it? Conservative thought.

And feminist thought... except feminists add on that men will and do rape to get it as a result.

You know what line of thought recommended circumcision to avoid masturbation? Puritanism and conservative thought.

You know who's fighting against making MGM illegal? Feminists.

You know what movement shits on the rights of gay men? Conservative movements.

You know what movement removes due process rights for gay men? Feminists.

You know what school of thought allowed men to be imprisoned for getting a woman pregnant without marrying her? That's right bud, conservatives. I'm sorry but this is completely delusional.

And feminists. Or did you think that preventing fathers from having equal parenting rights led to happy endings for the father?

If you care about men and men's rights I'd seriously give your attitude and priorities a serious thought.

Oh yeah, feminists attacking due process rights, fighting against equal parenting rights, fighting FOR rape of men to be legal.

We should definitely support that over tradcons....lol

[–]seraph341 -4 points-3 points-2 points 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

[–]bufedad 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Feminists supporting the rape of men

https://m.jpost.com/Israel/Womens-groups-Cancel-law-charging-women-with-rape

Nepal feminists also blocked legislation there ...

Women’s rights activists had criticised the draft ordinance saying it wasn’t empathetic towards the plight of the victims. They said that having a provision saying even men could be victims of rape could could further weaken the women rape victims’ fight for justice.

https://kathmandupost.com/national/2020/12/11/ordinance-amends-law-on-rape-but-fails-to-recognise-rape-of-boy-child-and-sexual-minorities

Even if you only care about women, you should still stop women from raping because the majority of men convicted of raping women were sexually violated by adult women when they were boys. Multiple studies in the US, UK, and Canada have shown this. Around 10 of them cited here.

http://empathygap.uk/?p=1993#_Toc498111528

Feminists fighting against equal parenting rights

http://web.archive.org/web/20050205235305/http://www.now.org:80/organization/conference/1996/resoluti.html#alert

Remember, fathers only want to parent their kids as a way to abuse the mothers...

Feminists removing due process rights in college

https://feministmajority.org/our-work/title-ix/

Feminists fighting against due process rights in legal courts

http://www.michaelspratt.com/law-blog/bill-c-51-creates-unprecedented-case-of-reverse-disclosure

Your ignorance of the actions of the feminist movement are not my fault.

[+]Anih1list -14 points-13 points-12 points 5 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]bufedad 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]Anih1list -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]MBV-09-C 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]reddut_gang 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]bufedad 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Beltox2pointO 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (49 children) | Copy Link

[–]DirtAndGrass 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]andejoh[S] 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (30 children) | Copy Link

CRT is the BS theory that history isn't really history so they go back to make everything about race. They claim race is just a social construct. Duh, but that's way too simplistic and ignores history and science. Families are also "social constructs", but because children can't fend for themselves was also "necessary". Certainly there could be alternative "it takes a village", but we would have to get there first.

When people fought for resources, thyey knew there was strength in numbers. Of course, because you had the family construct, the first source of numbers were family. Then extended family, which would probably form the basis for tribes. They're races because oif genetic relation. There could be other basis for tribes. We could look at the Los Angelas Dodgers. They could have players from different countries and races, but when they play the San Diego Padres, they're united.

Where CRT gets things completely wrong is that the social structures are intended to keep the status quo. Why are white people in charge in the U.S.? Go back to the struggle for resources. I don't believe there was a single group who didn't believe that you could take land by force and be the legitemate owner. Prior to 1700 or so, just about every group believed in slavery. Many African slaves were actually captured by other African tribes and sold to the Europeans also there was a huge slave trade in captured Europeans in Africa. It's a bit more than I can get into, but essentially everyone played by the same rules more or less, the Europeans won at least in the Americans so status quo supports them.

Why does CRT fail? They don't actually want to get rid of the systems. When jobs are filled based on employee recommendation rather than advertized that limits who can get them especially if it's not advertized even within the company so it's only a deppartment or a few managers who know. That limits the pool of candidates. People build relationships based on where they live, go to school, etc.

When ACB got put on SCOTUS, she diversified the body., Her law degree was from the midwest. I believe the others were all Harvard or Ivy league and that was for some time. There are a lot more inter racial marriages today than 50 years ago. There are a lot of ways people form tribes (city, school, state, sports team, country, etc.). I doubt race is the defining factor that proponents of CRT claim it is,.

[–]Beltox2pointO -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (29 children) | Copy Link

[–]andejoh[S] 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (28 children) | Copy Link

[–]Beltox2pointO 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (27 children) | Copy Link

[–]andejoh[S] 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link

[–]Beltox2pointO 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link

[–]andejoh[S] 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]Beltox2pointO 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]andejoh[S] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Historical-March-510 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

[–]Beltox2pointO 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

[–]Historical-March-510 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

Well my explanation is not a true explanation and can be picked apart as an untruth. The biggest problem with CRT is the fact that even those who have studied it the longest and support it to the point of informing people, can't fully define it or even agree on the belief system of what it was meant to represent. It is widely left to the person to interpret its meanings. Thus, when teachers push it on to children, they do it through their own interpretations. For example when the school in Australia forced all the young boys to stand up in all front of everyone, and apologize to all the girls for the rapes their gender caused. They did not take into consideration that men also get raped. They did not consider how basically they shamed those boys for being born male. Not because any of those boys had ever done anything wrong, but just because they were boys. The principal tried to say the school was trying to do it out of some symbolic respect thing. Except the school showed no respect for those boys.

This is also how CRT has been handled and why it is being enforced that it can no longer be taught. It is coming down to a young white male is being taught to be ashamed of himself for just being born. It is spreading even further to say that when laws are written in a colorblind manor, they can still be interpreted in a way that can still cause racism. These very teachings are causing our society to be further torn apart rather than bringing it together. So rather than truly defining it, I am simply talking about what is happening.

[–]Schadrach 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]Beltox2pointO -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]andejoh[S] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]brokedown 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

[–]Beltox2pointO 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

[–]brokedown 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

[–]Beltox2pointO -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[–]brokedown 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

[–]Beltox2pointO -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

[–]brokedown 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]Beltox2pointO -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]brokedown 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]andejoh[S] -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]reddut_gang -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Hansjg05 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]DirtAndGrass 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]nexisprime 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]DKS6 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[+]7SM3 points 5 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Do not come here from your liberal hell as it burns to the ground please!

[–]DKS6 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]EverydayEverynight01 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]andejoh[S] 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Positive-Guidance-99 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+]Vulcanized-Homeboy -26 points-25 points-24 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]ridderrobby 16 points17 points18 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]reddut_gang 15 points16 points17 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]OccultRitualCooking 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+]allstonoctopus -14 points-13 points-12 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[–]reddut_gang 10 points11 points12 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[+]allstonoctopus -6 points-5 points-4 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]reddut_gang 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]nexisprime 11 points12 points13 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You have no idea what you are talking about. I can tell you haven't even read the bill. The main point of the bill is that is prohibits teachers from saying that "an individual, by virtue of his or her race or sex, is inherently racist, sexist or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously."

Slavery can and will be taught. Same with with Women's Suffrage and the Civil Rights Movement. We're not going to stop teaching about the struggles our country has gone through and the evils that have happened. We're just not going to pretend that we're still committing those evils or that innocent people are responsible for them.

Are there still racists and sexists? Yes, of course. We'll never be able to completely get rid of evil people, but it's not half the country like people on the left seem to think.

Here is the bill, OK HB 1775. Hopefully you read it and realize that it's not the big, bad racist bill you think it is. I wish you well.

[+]allstonoctopus -7 points-6 points-5 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]MBV-09-C 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You can teach kids the struggles of past people, what this bill and this user, and I by extension, are saying is that you can't use that as an excuse to say or imply 'white people bad' or 'man bad' in present day.

You also missed the part where they didn't say racism and sexism were done with either, they literally said

Are there still racists and sexists? Yes, of course. We'll never be able to completely get rid of evil people, but it's not half the country like people on the left seem to think.

There are still racist white people, and there are still sexist men, but trying to play it off like white people or men are inherently racist/sexist like the teachings being banned would, would be the equivalent of telling black people and women that they're inherently violent criminals and cheating whores, and that any of them that aren't are "one of the good ones".

That would obviously be a terribly racist/sexist thing to say, right? So why is trying to apply that same logic universally "ignorance and oppression"?

[+]reNeorage -23 points-22 points-21 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]bufedad 16 points17 points18 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+]Wraith-Gear -26 points-25 points-24 points 5 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

[–]reddut_gang 9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

[–]andejoh[S] 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+]Wraith-Gear -6 points-5 points-4 points 5 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

[–]reddut_gang 10 points11 points12 points 5 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

I'm pretty sure forcing boys to apologise for something they have no control over, simply because they are boys, is sexist.

There is more than just "some" need for advocacy. How far do you think the inequalities against men have improved since the inception of feminism? They've let the male-only draft slide with little fight. They've let circumcision slid without so much as a peep. Disparities in sentencing? "Yeah that sounds sexist, who does if affect worse? Men? Sorry, not our problem."

The unfortunate reality is that these issues still exist and are very rampant. Meanwhile, the previous inability to go to university, well now not only can you go to university, there are things reserved just for you to make it easier. For some reason y'all would rather nag about the past than to solve real inequalities that still exist to this day. Imagine if the next day, issues like circumcision and selective service were solved. sentencing disparities and child custody, they were solved. false accusations, solved. imagine if after all this was solved, we still complained about how it happened in the past? If we kept making up BS revenge laws because these issues existed in the past? I am almost certain you won't be as enthusiastic about that as you are with this bill.

more time attacking a straw women

Who do you think we are "attacking" under this post, genius? Do you mean to imply that all women vilify men and guilt them for something they were born with? Does that not make you the sexist? Implying that all women are the same? Perhaps you should check your own hate before accusing me of it.

I am also very sorry about you taking life and death matters less seriously than catcalling, but it is what it is.

you are equal to femaledatingstratagy

Does that sub advocate for legal equality? Didn't think so.

You shout down any call to reason

Give me some of that "reason", we wont ban you. But try to do it without ad-hominem.

and create an echo chamber to perpetuate this mentality.

Again, you're welcome to disagree. You're welcome to argue. Unlike feminist subs, we won't ban you for disagreeing.

Its a shame that you rendered a whole movement moot with your hate and thus guarantee nothing will ever be done about problems men face.

It's a shame that this movement even needs to exist in the first place. If I recall correctly, feminism was about equality of the sexes? If they kept true to their word, this movement would not need to exist. You know this to be true, seeing how nonchalantly you can disregard the human rights of an entire sex by the actions of one, curiously enough the same thing you accuse me of doing. People like you, you are all the same to me. If you looked in a mirror without knowing it was a mirror you would be breaking it in half.

[–]Wraith-Gear -4 points-3 points-2 points 5 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

If you think that the point of CRT, is to make white boys feel bad, you have lost the plot, or have been drinking the propaganda straight from the tin. You can not deny that minorities and women have been mistreated in the past. The point of these lessons is to explain why the world is the way it is today. That makes it an important segment of a history class. Any boy who feels at fault for the fight for women’s suffrage has misplaced blame.

I know men need an advocacy group i said as much. But i sure as shit ain’t going to accept help from a group who outwardly projects misandry, and who spend their time attacking anything that could possibly help feminists because of some warped view of “EqUaLiTy”.

This post is about stopping the teaching of CRT because it’s beneficial for feminist views. Sorry to break it to you, but history was not kind to women. If you think teaching CRT would further feminisms goals then thats arguing that the feminist points are valid.

When it comes to affirmative action, that is a limited response to a problem. The problem that certain groups are shown to be shut out of paths to success. We are not even close to effective parity in this regard.

I am not here to argue feminist talking points. Femaledatingstrategy argues that men treat women badly so under the banner of “EqUaLiTy” they attack men and belittle them and create strategies to undermine their progress. Its the same damn argument you just used on me. So to me you are the same, the only difference is you claim to act in my best interest forcing me to publicly denounce you.

My reason i wish to impart is this, acknowledge the feminist movement as a necessary component of women’s advocacy, call out actions they take that are harmful to men. But otherwise acknowledge their need to exist. Know that some women in that movement are toxic as hell and they do not represent feminism. Police your own by calling out people here who are acting in bad faith and tarnish the reputation of mens rights activists. Do not hive-mind into an echo chamber of hate.

You have failed to argue that women no longer need an advocacy group. And even if you could, you did absolutely NOTHING to forward mens rights. And for all the inequality that men face that you point too, that was put in place by society, not feminism.

[–]Input_output_error 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You can not deny that minorities and women have been mistreated in the past.

Yea of course minorities and women have been mistreated, just like majorities and men. Everyone got mistreated equally in the past, sure a merchant wouldn't have it as rough as a peasant, but that isn't about race or gender that is about class.

The point of these lessons is to explain why the world is the way it is
today. That makes it an important segment of a history class. Any boy
who feels at fault for the fight for women’s suffrage has misplaced
blame.

That is not what they are doing, they are looking to blame people from the past for present woe's. It has very little to do with history as a whole and it basically no different then religious classes that we used to have. We used to had to fear god, now we have to fear the patriarchy. Both these religions are 100% based on fairy tales and have little to no basis in reality.

I know men need an advocacy group i said as much. But i sure as shit
ain’t going to accept help from a group who outwardly projects misandry,
and who spend their time attacking anything that could possibly help
feminists because of some warped view of “EqUaLiTy”.

Being against feminism isn't 'pRoJeCtInG mIsAnDrY', having something against a hateful religion isn't a bad thing. 'Feminism' isn't the same as 'women' or 'women's rights', they are all different things, that you are equating them all is on you, not on the people pointing out the open misandry that feminism brings.

This post is about stopping the teaching of CRT because it’s beneficial
for feminist views. Sorry to break it to you, but history was not kind
to women. If you think teaching CRT would further feminisms goals then
thats arguing that the feminist points are valid.

No, this post is about feminist teachings becoming illegal because CRT is really no better then Nazi's or KKK. They all are theories based on race rather then on anything that has merit, so i really can not imagine one good reason not to ban this shit outright.

I'm sure you now want to say all kinds of nasty things about me for being a racist or some other dumb made up shit. But that won't help your cause one bit, refute how CRT isn't racist, that is the only viable response you have. But you can't because CRT is racist as fuck.

And again, history wasn't kind to anyone that wasn't of nobility, and even they didn't all live a life on roses. To say that 'history wasn't kind to women' is a platitude.

I am not here to argue feminist talking points. Femaledatingstrategy
argues that men treat women badly so under the banner of “EqUaLiTy” they
attack men and belittle them and create strategies to undermine their
progress. Its the same damn argument you just used on me. So to me you
are the same, the only difference is you claim to act in my best
interest forcing me to publicly denounce you.

Yea no, you are the one attacking him, when he won't take it you go and accuse him of attacking you. You are the one calling him 'hate filled' and other bullshit without addressing the actual points that he made. You can't go around 'denouncing' someone you first called names, if anything, he is denouncing your bullshit here.

My reason i wish to impart is this, acknowledge the feminist movement as
a necessary component of women’s advocacy, call out actions they take
that are harmful to men.

The problem with this is that it is feminism that is taking actions that are harmful to men. Feminism was never 'needed' in any way shape or form, we really have no need for more religious zealots. We don't need 'scholars' who make racist and sexist theories about life, really, we do not need those. We also do not need groups to shit on men, society has always done this plenty, both in the past and now.

Know that some women in that movement are toxic as hell and they do not
represent feminism. Police your own by calling out people here who are
acting in bad faith and tarnish the reputation of mens rights activists.
Do not hive-mind into an echo chamber of hate.

Your cognitive dissonance is staggering, absolutely staggering. So, 'we' have to look out for the 'bad apples' of feminism, but, we have to 'self police' MRM because of 'hive-mind' echo chamber of hate?!?

You're delusional if you really believe that the MRM is more hateful or doesn't police themselves better than feminism. Really, unlike feminism the MRM doesn't have some religious zealots prancing around crying to things like the UN about how bad it has been for men. That is all feminism, just like the hateful 'patriarchy theory'.

Look, feminism is the bad apple here, and everyone who associates with them are equally bad. You aren't the one who gets to decide what it means to be a 'feminist', nor are all the people who claim to be a feminist but are also about equality. Those people are the ones who aren't 'real' feminist. What feminism means and who decides what feminism is are the people who are writing the dogma, the ones who write stupid gendered shit into law or the 'academics' who invented CRT.

Feminism is the echo chamber of hate, not the MRM, there are not #KAW groups or books. Those are things that feminism does, but they aren't hateful, right!?

[–]Wraith-Gear -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Input_output_error 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sorry, i stopped dead when you said everyone was mistreated equally in
the past. If this is the general sentiment of the the subreddit then you
are far too gone to convince of any sanity.

Right, right, everyone must be 'far gone' because they do not believe in your apex fallacies.

Thats saying the quiet part out loud.

Yes, the quiet part of what history actually was like. I guess to you dying in wars at the whim of your lord or having to do backbreaking work as a peasant was a privilege.

People were not only repressed by class strata.

Not only.. because..

People were forced into class strata by their race and gender.

Yes, women weren't expected to die in wars and were not expected to pay their own way (just have a look at the first female north American settlers). Yes there were gender norms, but none of the female ones involved dying. So what is worse?

This is no surprise to anyone here. You argue in bad faith.

You saying that i 'argue in bad faith' doesn't make it so, just like the 'democratic republic of North Korea' isn't actually democratic or a republic. You are the one arguing in bad faith here. But that isn't really a surprise as you seem to love the feminist way of doing things. Flinging shit so you do not have to argue against the actual arguments being made.

[–]reddut_gang 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

You can not deny that minorities and women have been mistreated in the past.

....and men. is the mistreatment of men throughout history in CRT? if not then you are the one drinking propaganda. history was not kind to men either. and no, sending them out to die in wars is not kindness. neither is guilt tripping them into doing so. or cutting off parts of their penises.

If you think you are mistreated under equality, then I am sorry to say, but you have privilege.

nobody here really cares if your salty ass doesn't accept this movement. you seem to be so infuriated that you can't teach little boys to be ashamed of their gender. According to you, being against this is "projecting misandry". Typo maybe? Either way, I don't see how you can draw that conclusion.

Can we do affirmative action for men in biology then, if you so insist that it is necessary? Where is the fight for equality in that?

Femaledatingstrategy argues that men treat women badly so under the banner of “EqUaLiTy” they attack men and belittle them and create strategies to undermine their progress.

Let me know where I have attacked and belittled women. I already told you, you are the misogynistic one here, generalising all women.

Do you think we only care about annoying feminists on twitter? Do you think that's the only thing that irks us about the movement? You are but scratching the surface. There have been many instances of feminists fighting against the progression of men's rights. There has also been a total lack of support when it comes to solving inequalities for men. Like I said, this movement never needed to exist. Feminism promised equality. This movement exists because of promises unfulfilled. Your movements counter-protests to my movements protests give me much more reason to advocate against your movement than sexist twitter hashtags, even though neither should be happening. You tell me to police my own? I do. When I see ridiculous statements about where the movements priorities should be, I call it out accordingly. But what have feminists done to mitigate the misandry in their movement? A large platform and a large following is still afforded to said misandrists. Feminists tolerate and enable misandry, but they just can't help but throw a fit of rage when they see something they perceive as misogyny, even if there is no real misogyny to be found.

The difference between you and I, the difference between a feminist and an mra. Both our movements are riddled with hate. But my movement simply hates the opposition. My movement hates movements it feels hinders its progress. Your movement hates the entire opposite gender. Can men be feminists? I think they can. If someone hates feminists, I doubt they care which gender you are, just that you choose to adopt that label. Do you understand now, why I called you misogynist? Not all women are feminists either, and unlike your movement calling out the "not all" prefix, I actually agree with the statement. Not all women are feminists. We don't hate women, we just hate people like you. And unlike you people, we don't care which genitalia you were born with :)

My honest opinion on this whole fiasco. The race part is a significant loss. It is undoubtedly true that racism exists on a wide scale. But the gender part? pure bullshit. If both suffered, why do we only teach about the suffering of one? That is inequality. Why is gender even a part of critical race theory anyway?

The inequality we face, it was bad in a pre-feminist society, it is still bad in a feminist society, only slightly worse now because of uneven quotas and affirmative action. if that's the case, what even is the point of feminism, for us? just like I have replied to another comment, we men seem to always be shackled no matter who's running the show. better to be shackled without the vilification and problematic regulations a feminist society entails.

so while yes, most of our issues were there since the dawn of time, the addition feminism has proved to make certain things worse while adding new issues. it has been nothing but a net negative for us, so why support it? even a net neutral would be alright. but it doesn't seem to want to be that either.

[–]Wraith-Gear -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Everyone is equal, some are more equal then others.

CRT is there specifically to explore why minority groups after supposedly being equal by law find themselves not automatically flourishing. How these groups were placed in their economic class, and why they are stuck there. What steps have been taken to fix this, and what stands in the way. It might cover feminism in regard to women’s steps tword equality but is ultimately not really about feminism.

So this wingeing about how men during ww2 were drafted so that totally balances out all the problems in how society treated minorities is completely irrelevant to CRT. History largely ignored the plight of women. It is the explicit exception when men are not the defacto owners of their spouse and children. Things like the spartans come to mind. To claim that they were equal is absurd.

I do not consider myself a feminist. They have a bit of image problem too. And wile they claim to be a mens advocate group as well i know better. But lets get things straight. Femaledatingstrategy is not feminism. They may be feminist, but most feminist are not a part of femaledatingstrategy. You can not claim that the purpose of feminism is to hate men. Just like i do not call out men who are interested in mens rights, but the subreddit of being an echo chamber.

Let me ask you. What is the feminist game plan here that is in direct opposition to mens rights?

[–]reddut_gang 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Gee I didn't know women are a minority. Also love how you decide to minimise men's inequalities throughout history to prove your point. And let's not forget strawmen lmfao.

So this wingeing about how men during ww2 were drafted so that totally balances out all the problems in how society treated minorities is completely irrelevant to CRT.

When men get drafted, that includes black men, latino men, asian men etc. I myself am a south asian man. I am every bit as passionate about racial inequality as I am gender inequality. So please, don't strawman, it only turns people away. Also I told you once, and I'll tell you again, I don't give a shit about fds. I do however, give a shit about things that happen in real life, like counter-protests against men's rights, by mostly feminist type people.

Let me ask you. What is the feminist game plan here that is in direct opposition to mens rights?

To me, from my observations, both anecdotal and societal observations, feminism is much less about equality than it is about tipping the scales of imbalance towards their favour. And it has been that way for a while. Third wave, second wave, and many of the first wave suffragettes only joined on to the demand when conscription responsibilities were dropped. That kind of thinking is in direct opposition of equal rights from any perspective. Ironically enough, third wave is probably the only wave with individuals who give a shit about real equality, and it catches the most flack for sexism. It's not a good look when your best wave is also your worst.

[–]Wraith-Gear -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]reddut_gang 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A minority is a group who is subordinate to another

Oh so now we're just changing definitions now? Bunch of bs. Women are not minorities, they make up half the world, and represent half of it as well. Furthermore, who's to say they are subordinate to men? Being exempt the responsibilities of selective service is quite the privilege. Furthermore, childbirth is a choice, getting drafted isn't.

If you have a problem with the draft thats great, but it does not balance out the suffering of others by society dominated by men.

Go tell that to the families of the conscripted. Maybe even the conscripted themselves.

And like I said, if you want to bring up racial issues in a gendered issue, black men, latino men, asian men, they were all drafted, because they were men. If CRT does not cover this, it should be rid of gendered issues completely, because you cannot talk about the suffering of one while purposely ignoring the suffering of others.

[–]andejoh[S] 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]Wraith-Gear -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]reddut_gang 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]killindice-26 points 5 years ago* [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link

Bruh, THEORY is in the title of CRT. How the fuck you gonna make people do shit that is fucking THEORETICAL?

[–]Gynocentrism_Can_SMD 12 points13 points14 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]LazyFarmerBot 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]goodmod[M] 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+]killindice-15 points 5 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

TRIGGERED

[–]Gynocentrism_Can_SMD 11 points12 points13 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oklahoma "accidentally" cancels feminism. "The new law prohibits public school teachers of grades K-12 from teaching eight different concepts about race, including that an individual, by virtue of his or race or sex, is inherently racist, sexist or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously."

Comments

NOT ANYMORE, ENDED