Feminist tries to justify why women and children first should still be valid

blueoak9 · 2017-09-01T18:01:47+00:00

Feminist thinks women are cows in the harem of one bull.

HeForeverBleeds · 2017-09-01T18:14:05+00:00

It's no surprise that feminists only reject traditional gender roles when they restrict females, but embrace them when they privilege females

It's the same with how they say men should still pay on dates, or men should never hit women because all of a sudden women are weaker (when otherwise they're just as strong if not superior)

Same with this. It's wrong to value females only in terms of their reproductive role when traditionalists say "women should stay home and have children instead of work". But it's fine to value females only in terms of their reproductive role when trying to justify male disposability

TigPlaze · 2017-09-01T18:21:21+00:00

This is a feminist being a hypocrite for the zillion-kahillion-kajillionth time.

PM_ME_UR_NUDES_PLZZZ · 2017-09-01T18:01:33+00:00

There is a reason you don't have children with family members. What happens if an entire generation all had the same father? There would surely be consequences.

ThePoorAlot · 2017-09-01T18:58:28+00:00

Last time I checked there were almost 4 billion females, so her argument is moot anyway.

SporkTornado · 2017-09-01T20:52:54+00:00

At a world population of 8,000,000,000 and still growing strong her argument holds no weight.

revengeofthedirty47 · 2017-09-01T21:06:19+00:00

biology only when beneficial.

Crusader_1096 · 2017-09-01T20:58:26+00:00

This is so stupid. No, you would not just need one dude in order to sustain the population. That would lead to a disastrous amount of genetic bottlenecking and incest. What a fucking moron.

2017-09-02T01:44:30+00:00

As a species we aren't in trouble so this mentality is a fallacy she uses to justify her superiority complex. The reality is 1 billion people both equally men and women could die tomorrow and as a species we wouldn't even notice.

2017-09-01T20:12:18+00:00

Ah inbreeding, always good to keep it in the family.

/s

themastadon89 · 2017-09-02T01:08:36+00:00

So that would mean most women over 40 don't get a spot on the life boat right?

Autumnland · 2017-09-01T22:58:29+00:00

"When people get used to preferential treatment, equal treatment seems like discrimination.” - Thomas Sowell

badon_ · 2017-09-02T07:19:52+00:00

Oh look, female hypergamy at it's finest.

Most of them all want a single chad to fuck, they don't care about relationships.

Mode1961 · 2017-09-01T22:27:02+00:00

Actually, that is funny as hell.

If one guy is impregnating lots of women , it means ALL the kids will be brothers and sisters. HMMMM, I don't think that would work out well for mankind

hottake_toothache · 2017-09-02T02:44:14+00:00

Fascinating. I don't think I've previously seen a feminist embrace the evolutionary reason for male disposability as a basis for female supremacy.

Of course, it is not more morally valid than the argument that rape is ethical because it occurs in nature. The fact that something has an evolutionary basis does not mean it is acceptable.

v574v · 2017-09-02T02:44:39+00:00

Yeah, because a boat sinking with 50 people on it somewhere is somehow the end of mankind.

Also, that's fine for women, but why children then?

furchfur · 2017-09-02T09:36:31+00:00

You could just as easily INCORRECTLY and offensively argue that all women past the menopause should not be saved at all. They are completely redundant and cannot reproduce at all. A man goes on producing viable sperm until very old age.

dontpet · 2017-09-01T20:21:36+00:00

Context is important. That could be just some playful banter between friends. Can you give us context op?

Pathfinder24 · 2017-09-01T22:33:53+00:00

Believe it or not, there was a point in the history of man where this was necessary. This approach of behavioral understanding is called evolutionary psychology.

AmuseDeath · 2017-09-02T00:28:06+00:00

So basically equality when it comes to getting pay and rights and special treatment when it comes to tackling hardships and accepting responsibility.

Sounds about right!

Blutarg · 2017-09-02T00:36:54+00:00

Oh yes, there's such a shortage of people in the world.

spacedogg · 2017-09-02T02:19:05+00:00

That is actually valid and the reason why women are more valued by society than men

2017-09-02T06:37:05+00:00

Decency is also a rare factor. She's clearly not decent... "off the boat".

HiilestTehtyAffena · 2017-09-02T06:39:14+00:00

Could somebody explain what's feminist about stating this fact? The shaming part in the end?

UDT22 · 2017-09-02T08:13:31+00:00

It's called female privilege.

2017-09-02T09:35:11+00:00

Yeah, lets have a world with one man for every five women. I'm sure that won't shrink the gene pool when large portions of the population all have the same dads. We'll be fine. (AKA: why hypergamy in general is unsustainable).

Funcuz · 2017-09-02T11:57:13+00:00

I always hear this nonsense. Do people not know about inbreeding? Did we completely forget about that or something?

Yeah, one man could impregnate an unlimited number of women. They'll get maybe four generations in before they're so inbred that they completely wipe out the human race simply by existing. Good plan.

In either case, it makes no difference to anybody in the here and now. I'm not giving up my seat on the lifeboat just so some bitch can call me a hero today and then blame me for the disaster tomorrow. I don't owe her anything so why the fuck should I give up my seat?

2017-09-02T12:33:47+00:00

Inbreeding issues? What's that?

McFeely_Smackup · 2017-09-02T16:15:33+00:00

Isn't the actually number to make sure the human race survives with enough genetic diversity something like 8,000? 4,000 women and 4,000 men? Or am I just pulling numbers out of my ass?

McFeely_Smackup · 2017-09-02T17:29:49+00:00

Ok, so we need to save some men, but no women who aren't fertile.

Got it.

kartu3 · 2017-09-02T18:54:50+00:00

There is nothing wrong with "children" part.
As for there being reasons for "women first", YES there are reasons, goddamit, but KNOW YOUR PRIVILEGE is the point.

bloodthorn1990 · 2017-09-02T20:15:16+00:00

i say let em. so we can figure out how to fix whats wrong in 10% of the time than if they were around

2017-09-02T22:16:32+00:00

Isn't that the base for Male Disposability though? That Women are more biologically important and therefore society can afford to throw away men in wars and dangerous hard labor jobs? This could be very easily turned around on her.

RatMan29 · 2017-09-03T00:47:41+00:00

Sooner or later this woman will have to learn what TANSTAAFL means. And it sounds like she insists on finding it out the hard way.

2017-09-03T01:41:45+00:00

"What is genetic diversity."

If every child from today on was fathered by one man, then we'd be fucked pretty quickly as a species.

CuckKnight · 2017-09-03T12:26:09+00:00

So...what about women who no longer have any more eggs? Is it young women and children first, men second, and old women last?

Why is making more gametes seen as a bad trait and making a only few gametes seen as a valuable trait? So you limit your capabilities and suddenly you're more valuable to society? Is that how it works?

How happy would women be if they had to support themselves and their children all by themselves because they got their sperm from the single sperm donor and there are no other men around and no welfare or anything like that to help out?

2017-09-05T19:54:59+00:00

Well, at least they're admitting to not even seeing us as humans anymore, just walking ATM's that can do work for them and impregnate people.

Terminal-Psychosis · 2017-09-01T23:40:23+00:00

She's not completely wrong, though not for the reason she thinks.

If 95% of men died overnight, humans would survive. 95% of women? Bye bye homo sapiens.

Women are inherently worth more for reproductive reasons.

Use to be men got respect for taking care of wife & family. Nowadays, what's the use?

Title	Feminist tries to justify why women and children first should still be valid
Author	jaib9
Upvotes	451
Comments	95
Date	September 1, 2017 5:45 PM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6xg6eb/feminist_tries_to_justify_why_women_and_children/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/feminist-tries-to-justify-why-women-and-children.914953 https://theredarchive.com/post/914953

Comments