TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

I hate double standards

Fast-Mongoose-4989

October 19, 2021
121 upvotes
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2021/oct/18/i-feel-hurt-that-my-life-has-ended-up-here-the-women-who-are-involuntary-celibates
Archived from /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates is a place for the discussion of men's issues from a left wing perspective.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title I hate double standards
Author

Fast-Mongoose-4989

Upvotes 121
Comments 48
Date October 19, 2021 1:37 AM UTC
(4 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/qb110f/i_hate_double_standards/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/i-hate-double-standards.1078725
https://theredarchive.com/post/1078725
Red Pill terms in post
double standardsstandards
Top posts by Fast-Mongoose-4989

everything is geared towards women yet somehow I'm privileged

671 upvotes
October 29, 2022
/r/MensRights

Men and boys are taught and forced to sacrifice for the greater good and collective while women and girls are basically taught the opposite

505 upvotes
May 27, 2023
/r/MensRights

Man who fled Ukraine on foot says conscripts are dragged from families

482 upvotes
July 24, 2022
/r/MensRights

Prison hurts women more than men — so England is trying a new approach

421 upvotes
September 24, 2022
/r/MensRights

I'm looking for articles about red cross leaving men to die and oy saving women and children.(don't know if it's true)

306 upvotes
September 25, 2022
/r/MensRights

Women have so many opportunities and resources and so much privilege it's just unfair

305 upvotes
January 30, 2024
/r/MensRights

Incels waging 'war against women' and pose 'emerging threat to children', study finds | UK News

286 upvotes
September 30, 2022
/r/MensRights

Sexually abused boy kills self after radio station reveals his identity

247 upvotes
April 27, 2023
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]SpanishM 99 points100 points101 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Misandry is mostly a reaction to misogyny and informed by evidence.

These kind of statements always remind me of the Grey's Law:

"Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice"

[–]Jakeybaby125 41 points42 points43 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Not to mention this publication proves the exact opposite of what she's saying

[–]SpanishM 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Very interesting, thanks for the link!

[–]TheSpaceDuck 63 points64 points65 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

This article is an absolute trainwreck, and potentially dangerous as it deliberately hides female violence that comes from this sentiment.

​

Theirs is a non-violent resistance.

I guess tell that to Mark Van Dongen, who rejected a woman only to be attacked with acid as she said "If I can't have you, no one will". Oh wait we can't tell him, he's dead now after months of suffering.

We should also tell that to the woman who stabbed a man for refusing sex and then threatened to accuse him of rape if he went to the hospital.

Or the woman who set her husband's genitals on fire because he hugged another woman, then claimed "I just wanted to burn his penis so it belongs to me and no one else. ... I didn't mean this to happen".

​

Rather than blaming the opposite sex for their unhappiness, as some of their male counterparts do

A quick look at FDS would immediately show you it's precisely the opposite. Blaming men is a defining trait in these groups. Even the author herself proceeds to blame men for women's involuntary celibacy, go figure.

​

“The biggest difference between men and women seems to be that men feel entitled to sex and relationships"

Last time I checked it was women who frequently believed men have no right to say no to sex and men's experiences rejecting women seem to have plenty of entitlement and aggression in them.

The scariest thing is: this comes from a mainstream newspaper, not some shady corner of the internet. When you have mainstream media openly covering up for gender violence and attempting to justify it, you know we've reached a worrying point.

[–]bottleblank 32 points33 points34 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I would say, if I were being charitable, that "those are a minority of very messed up women and those events and attitudes don't represent the majority of women". But they're so very rarely that charitable to men in that exact same way that I'm not sure they deserve that kind of defence.

I wouldn't even be trying to defend them in saying that, I would be trying to represent reality. We don't have piles of corpses on the street from men and women warring over gender. We have isolated incidents of one attacking the other. That's how it's been, that's how it's going to continue being, because we're humans, and humans aren't flawless.

But as long as men don't get the same consideration, compassion, and benefit of the doubt, I refuse to accept "women aren't violent" or "men are violent" as facts. They're not universally true, and to apply one as a generalisation would be to justify using the other as a generalisation.

[–]Valoxity-_- 23 points24 points25 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I think Jordan Peterson said it best, If you assume men are more violent you would be correct 60% of the time. Men are sligtly more likely to resort to physical violence, and they also tend to do more damage when thet chose that as an option. Women are only 10% less likely to partake in violence. In domestic violence cases most of the time both parties go back and forth with each other, It is rarely one sided.

PEOPLE SHOULD'NT HIT PEOPLE PERIOD!

[–]Vegetable_Ad6969 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ontop of that, the gap is further shrunk because female abusers know and exploit the fact that they will be believed by default, and know they can get away with it. While potential male abusers have to show much more restraint because of the severe repercussions.

[–]ShoutoutsToSimple 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's just classic feminist bullshit. Observe a small percentage of men doing something bad, and use that to generalize all men. Observe a small percentage of women doing something bad, and sweep it under the rug, because even bringing up such a small thing clearly means you are arguing in bad faith. End result is that men and women do something in pretty equal measure, yet feminists insist that it's something which most/all men do, and few/no women do.

[–]Algoresball 36 points37 points38 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

If you look at the writers tweeter, a bunch of the replies are a like “ thanks for bringing this important issue to our attention, what are we going to do about this?” I’m sorry what? I thought no one was entitled to sex. These women should hit the gym and and work on their personality

[–]bottleblank 28 points29 points30 points 4 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Just be yourself, it'll happen eventually, when you least expect it! Don't try so hard, they can sense your desperation!

But seriously, a week or two ago, a month ago, two months ago, the message was "these terrorist incel scum, of course they don't deserve help, look at them, being all bitter and misogynistic, feeling entitled to relationships, even the supposedly non-violent ones are disgusting excuses for human beings".

Now it's the exact same issue with women, it's "oh no, society is failing, however could we have let this happen? it's so sad how these women are being left out, we must get this out into the open and explain how we're suffering and why it needs to be fixed".

Most of the examples weren't even about crushingly depressing life-long failure to attain any kind of relationship or intimacy either, unlike the experience many lonely/incel men have.

It's absolutely infuriating. If you'd spent all that time you were forming relationships, having sex, and being around supportive women instead being stuck in a world of being shunned, ignored, insulted, laughed at, abused, bullied, locked out of even the most basic intimacy, and unable to emote, you'd be pretty bitter and vocal about it when somebody gave you a chance to discuss it with like-minded people too.

I'd bet a hell of a lot more bitter than a middle-aged woman who hasn't "had any" for a few years.

[–]Algoresball 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The women interviewed seemed like the kind of people Who didn’t understand that the options they had in their 20s wouldn’t be around forever.

[–]Cyb3rd31ic_Citiz3n 19 points20 points21 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Is the woman in The Guardians article image pissed off that two gay guys are having sex and she ain't involved? XD

[–]Blauwpetjevalued LWMA contributor 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Fascinating article. I just scroll through it, but get the impression almost everything that's said in it is exactly the other way round.

[–]bottleblank 24 points25 points26 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Indeed. Much of that article applies to what men want and wish they could have too (and what they feel, for that matter). But the writer apparently considers that inappropriate because "men get violent about it, so they don't deserve compassion, but women? flawless delicate flowers, denied their one true happiness in life, never violent, never outspoken, we need to rescue these poor helpless victims".

Except (as has been mentioned in comments here) these women are talking about having been celibate for a few years, which is frankly insulting. Many incel men have never had a relationship, or sex, some have never even held hands or kissed.

If these women think it's life-destroying having to go 5 years without sex, they should try spending their entire lives without any physical or emotional intimacy. It's fucking hard.

[–]Fast-Mongoose-4989[S] 52 points53 points54 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This article points men in a bad light while painting femcells in a good light and just a lot of double standards and pure hypocrisy but I recommend you read it to better understand how absurd it actually is I wish they had just as much compassion for incels as they do fore femcels then maybe some good can come out of this.

[–]helloiseeyou2020 49 points50 points51 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

What a terrible, terrible, terrible article

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It's honestly the worst article the Guardian have put out to date.

It'll probably take them a while to top this one.

[–]Imaginary-Sense3733 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I genuinely read Jessica Valenti's column in the guardian for half a year thinking she was a satirical character and I thought it was brilliantly clever and funny, a slight exaggeration of the gripes middle aged white media women make made into a really entertaining caricature. You can imagine my suprise when the woman who wrote an article called "Why I miss being catcalled" in a national newspaper turned out to be 100% serious.

Yeah, the Guardian isn't great for men's issues...

[–]Tank-o-grad 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You have much much more faith in them than I...

[–]syrup_gd 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They made an article praising FDS

[–]sypherprince 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Journalism has been killed

[–]Vandechoz 76 points77 points78 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

they're calling these women celibate just because they've had a long dry spell, because their standards are too high (their words, not mine)?

how is that in any way the same as men who have been alone for their entire lives, and can't even get a date?

[–]bottleblank 24 points25 points26 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I've just read the article again, and I think this is a relevant quote to your comment:

According to Silva Neves, a sex and relationship psychotherapist with the UK Council of Psychotherapy, it is not uncommon for women to struggle to find a partner they find physically attractive, especially as they get older. “Society places a higher importance on women’s beauty,” he says.

As you point out, their standards are (quite evidently) too high. A psychotherapist says that "It's not uncommon for women to struggle to find a partner they find attractive". They find attractive? What luxury that must be, to have the option to choose. Women talk about "waiting for Mr. Right", and sure, he may never appear, but they could choose to look at other men. They might not like what they see, but it seems to me like they're still ultimately in control here, whereas male incels typically aren't. These women have the option to just aim a little bit lower.

I'm sure there are women who aren't aiming too high as well, I don't think it would be fair to not acknowledge that, I'm sure there are women who have psychological and physical difficulties relating to dating, just like men, but most of these women didn't seem to be in that position. 80% of the women in the article have had access to sex and relationships before (and the other 20% had dated). That's your representatives for this "femcel" cause? You couldn't find more women who haven't had the opportunity at all?

[–]BloomingBrains 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

In short, its "where have all the good men gone"?

What I find interesting is that a lot of the complaints like "I feel unattractive and invisible", "I don't see ugly women with handsome men, only the other way around" are exactly the same kind of complaints male incels make. That alone gives me an urge to take their experiences at face value.

On the other hand, when you look at the fact that a lot of them are older and merely haven't had sex/intimacy recently (which is generally true of pretty much all single older people, I'd wager), rather than never or rarely, it tempts one to lose all sympathy. This is basically someone in the first world complaining about third world problems they don't actually have whilst downplaying ones who really do have those problems. Oops, I just defined western feminism.

Anyway, these women don't know what its like to be treated like an unlovable freak and a monster, told that you think they're entitled to the opposite sex's bodies, cynically told that there is no way they could possibly be genuinely nice and must simply be faking it as a manipulation, having the opposite sex treat you like a threat just for walking up to them and saying hello, etc. They merely passed up all their genuinely good chances for a relationship in their 20's and are complaining that they very people they ignored don't want to repay them with adoration. I don't want to stoop to their level by calling them "entitled" but it does seem very much to me like a grave they dug themselves.

Another thing that popped out to me was how the author touched on complaints that men aren't good sexual partners because they never cared about the woman's pleasure unless it was a loving relationship, which they apparently didn't want either. Frankly, on both accounts, I think this generalization is complete bullshit. There are a ton of guys out there that both want to do both things. Again, they were clearly passed up. If you keep on finding men that treat you callously, what does that say about you? Is it possible that you're simply attracted to dark triad types?

[–]bottleblank 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

What I find interesting is that a lot of the complaints like "I feel unattractive and invisible", "I don't see ugly women with handsome men, only the other way around" are exactly the same kind of complaints male incels make. That alone gives me an urge to take their experiences at face value.

On the other hand, when you look at the fact that a lot of them are older and merely haven't had sex/intimacy recently (which is generally true of pretty much all single older people, I'd wager), rather than never or rarely, it tempts one to lose all sympathy. This is basically someone in the first world complaining about third world problems they don't actually have whilst downplaying ones who really do have those problems. Oops, I just defined western feminism.

That was my initial reaction (the first paragraph, and why I was understanding of some early comments here), because I bet there really are women out there who have as much trouble as some badly affected men. But then I read the article, and your second paragraph is it. I accept that there probably are women out there who have just as much trouble as male incels, but these women aren't them.

There are a ton of guys out there that both want to do both things.

It's funny really, as a man who ranks sex lower than acceptance, companionship, and intimacy (in that order), it just makes me want to help those who truly need it, to be with a woman who so badly needs what I need, and hasn't had the opportunity to experience it, just like me. Seems like that would be a fit on some level at least. I'm aware there's an element of "women are wonderful" to that, I won't deny it, I'm a straight guy, it happens. But I sure as hell exist, and I'm not a sex-crazed one-night-stander who couldn't understand respect if it belted him in the face.

Point is, you're right, not all men are about just sex, or even mostly sex, it's just that they've been ignored and treated like dirt for so long they've regressed into a mental shell, scared of everything from not knowing how to be intimate to being abused for trying. So they... we... don't. When a man has experienced nothing but that for years, decades even, it's not like they're suddenly going to pop up out of nowhere when Miss World-Doesn't-Respect-My-Youth-Anymore starts banging on about how she's done with partying and adoration and wants somebody deeper. They either don't know that opportunity exists or they think it's a trap.

[–]BloomingBrains 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

They either don't know that opportunity exists or they think it's a trap.

Both. I've talked to so many women (mainly ones my age, in their 20's) that act so cynical. Honestly, its really off-putting. Even if I were more popular, I don't know that I'd even want to be with a lot of them. I want someone warm and vivacious. Not necessarily super bubbly and naïve, but quietly passionate, like me. I'm pretty cynical myself, so I understand to a certain extent, but I'm only defensively cynical about the world in general...when it comes to individual people, I always give them a chance to show they're different. But when it comes to us guys, no, apparently we are all the same.

A lot of the time, I'm wondering, "who hurt you?" Only it turns out that when you actually ask that question, it ends up being things like that are relatively trivial compared to what a lot of guys have been through. Stuff that basically amounts to being mistreated by fuckbois, which is really tempting to view as a self-inflicted problem. For example, I had this one friend I visited who told me she had a hangover when I showed up. I asked why and she said she was binge drinking the night before because a guy stood her up on a date. (This really didn't surprise me, she was into fratty guys). Meanwhile, if I binge drank every time I have been stood up or ghosted I would have developed liver cancer by now. That kind of thing was basically my routine back then. That same girl ended up complaining to me later about multiple suitors sending her flowers for Valentines day, which apparently she didn't find moving at all. I don't really understand the dichotomy at play there. Do you want a sweet guy or not?

You have to sort of walk this fine line between acknowledging the hypocrisy without being too judgmental of the women that have been seriously hurt. Because they do exist. Maybe to a smaller degree or not; I'm not really sure. But it does seem to be a weird dichotomy. As a woman, the slings an arrows seem to be relatively minor compared to the assault that your average frustrated man goes through. But when they have it worse, its much worse. I've spoken to women who had been raped by douchey frat guys. Ironically, they have most reason to be cynical, so you'd think they'd believe there are good men out there even less so, but that's not the case at all. If anything, they were actually more accepting of that idea.

[–]bottleblank 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I'd echo pretty much all of what you said there.

Your first paragraph pretty much describes me, but I'd add that I've only become cynical because I don't get the opportunity to be anything else. I don't even want to be cynical, I can be upbeat, passionate, outgoing, and positive if the situation is right, but that so rarely happens that my default and most experienced state is "everything is terrible, and people make it that way on purpose, there is no hope". It feels unjustified or risky to let down that negatively reactive attitude or that defence mechanism most of the time. I'd love to be with somebody I could stop being so defensive around (although it would take some time to build the trust to allow me to do that fully), and I think being with somebody warm and vivacious (but not aggressive) would be such a positive influence on me.

Your second paragraph rings true as well, and that's part of the issue I have with cultural expectations and advice around dating/relationships. It seems that no matter what you do, you're wrong according some somebody (or some loud groups, in the context of internet discussions). If you try and be soft and romantic but trying to do that turns out to be unwelcome or offputting, what message is that going to send? That we shouldn't be romantic? What, then, if she immediately wanders away from your affections and dates/has sex with a man or series of men who seem not to be at all romantic or, worse, clearly treat women like crap? At some point the conclusion you come to is "she lied about what she wanted" or "I'm too unacceptable to date even if I do the thing she wanted". She might even come back to you to complain about other men she's having issues with. You're good enough to be an emotional release valve, but not good enough to date? That feels like being used.

I understand that women are individuals, so it might simply be that the advice one gives or the preferences and experiences one expresses don't apply to the next woman, in that sense I think it would be unfair to generalise "women" as being confused/hypocritical/disingenuous. But it seems very difficult to judge early on which one is which, and if you take too long then you didn't show enough interest or commitment, or you act and use the wrong approach, you're done. It just feels like an absolute minefield, where the consequences (moreso for men, doubly so for neuro-atypical men) are much worse than many complaints women have or consider to be showstoppers, as you said.

Edit: I'd also add that women rarely approaching men, or not communicating in a straightforward way, is another related part of the problem. If you silently expect a man to make a move or to do something, or you express it in a non-obvious way (again, especially when the man is neuro-atypical) such as subtle flirting or body language, it's going to miss the target. That's why many autistic men have issues, because even if somebody is flirting with them, they don't see it, and they're too scared to make a move in case the signs they think they saw weren't flirting (or worse, were flirting, but not "that kind of flirting" and intended to be platonic fun/friendliness), and everything's going to get messy and awkward, they're going to get rejected and feel terrible for not having read, or having misread, the signs. This also applies to being in a relationship, if you manage to find one, if the communication isn't there and the woman is expecting some further action like progressing the physical boundaries of the relationship or expecting some kind of romantic gesture, but it's not made absolutely clear, it's going to result in more hesitancy from the man who's trying not to be overbearing, needy, or pushy.

[–]wrekd 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Which I why the Guardian is shit and cannot be trusted.

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I would be interested to know how big the male incel community is compared to the femcel community?

[–]over348 23 points24 points25 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Male incels are more abundant. Look at male celibacy rates in college. Male celibacy is significantly higher than female

[–]Maldevinine 19 points20 points21 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You've got to consider the dynamics as well. Notice how most of the women in the article were 40+? That's because women get less sexual attention as they get older. So Femcels would largely be older women, where incels are largely younger men.

[–]bottleblank 22 points23 points24 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

That would be a concern to me on the basis that, although it might not be fun to think of yourself as a woman who no longer believes she has value because her looks have faded and she's no longer considered young and attractive, if men are unable to ever feel that confidence, there is (clearly, see: incels) a risk that they may lose the ability to try and to become bitter and self-sabotaging before they even begin.

I'm sure, as Carkudo mentioned in another reply, this reversal of timelines greatly changes the experience and chances of recovery because of the difference in lived experience up to that point.

If you've spent the first (romantically/sexually capable) 20 years of your life feeling broken, unwanted, unloved, excluded, ugly, and warped, you're not going to be able to think back to when you were attractive and popular and think "I did that all back then, maybe I can do it again now". You have no emotional or sexual experience to draw from (and now you're 40, who's going to want a clueless 40 year old?), no understanding that anybody has ever found or could ever find you attractive, not even the faded remains of what once was a strong confidence that you could find a partner with relative ease. You have, or at least believe that you have (not entirely without reason), nothing, zero chance, even less than zero chance from not being able to prove you're worth something. You don't even have nice memories to recall and think "wow, wasn't dating amazing?".

In contrast, if you're a woman who has had a string of romantic and sexual partners, having had time and experience to understand peoples' needs, expectations, desires, the dynamics of dating, the realities of sex, and validation that you are (or at least were) considered attractive and socially valuable, you have a massive advantage over a man who has none of these things plus the destroyed confidence that women in this position might feel.

[–]Carkudo 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The reason there are few older incels isn't because men just age their way into relationships and sex lmao

[–]Maldevinine 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Apart from all the man bashing (seriously, they took a break every couple of sentences just to reinforce the men=bad narrative) I quite like the article. It's an honest discussion of how changes in the dating market have resulted in groups of people losing out, and the thoughts and beliefs that go with it.

Now we just need to strip all the man-bashing out and make it gender neutral, and we'd actually be getting somewhere to fixing the problem.

[–]Carkudo 30 points31 points32 points 4 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

You're okay with them equating the situation incels face to that of women who got old and stopped having sex because they don't like their options?

[–]Maldevinine 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Yes, some of the issues are mirrors of each other, in that men gain the attributes that make them attractive as they age while women lose them. But things like pointing out that hookup culture benefits the most attractive over everybody else, that #metoo has made men less likely to approach in general and that apps are a massive problem are all common between people who can't get the partners that they want of both genders.

But more interesting I found was the comments about not wanting sex specifically, but rather the wanting of an intimate partner. That's what I hear from the incels that I talk to, and those friends of mine who do not have a partner but would not identify themselves as and incel. That and how there's been a movement by these women to create shared spaces with other people who are suffering the same way.

In this article I see the possibility of actually breaking through and gaining empathy for those men who can't get a romantic partner. I need to put a bit more thought into it to work out what arguments would be effective, but this is the first time I've had hope.

[–]Carkudo 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

I like that they equate the issues of a group of disadvantaged men to the issues of a group of privileged women because I feel that will eventually make things better for the former. I don't know how it will, but I still think this is good.

I mean... Need I even say anything?

[–]Maldevinine 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

You're doing the same thing that they're doing to us. You're assuming that these people are privileged, and you're also making assumptions as to why they can't find partners.

Some of the things in the article given as reasons why they can't find partners were things like "I've always been ugly", "I can't make connections over phone apps" and "I don't trust bringing people straight back to my place which is expected now days". They also brought up how they get approached less often after #metoo.

Those are not issues tied to standards being too high or to privilege. Those are people wanting an intimate connection and being dumped into a system that doesn't make it easy to find one.

[–]Carkudo 17 points18 points19 points 4 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link

Literally people who choose not to have sex and relationships vs. people with no choice. Of course the people with the freedom to choose are privileged.

I understand that you have some sort of hunch that this is beneficial to incel men, but a hunch is not very convincing.

[–]bottleblank 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

Edit: This is a complete rewriting of this comment because I think my original comment was misrepresentative of what I feel about this and it was also needlessly long and rambling:

I see what the commenter above is trying to say when drawing the comparisons between the experiences of disadvantaged men and, later in life, disadvantaged women. I do think there is something to be said for the idea that both men and women can be victims of these unresolved pushes for new gender roles and social order (which are not yet coherent with reality), so that neither are happy with the new dynamics created by them because it makes everything that would normally result in success in the relationship game much more difficult for everybody. I do understand that it appears sensible that if we fix those inconsistencies for women then it may also fix them for men.

But I have to disagree with the expected outcome of that, especially if it's approached from the perspective of women. I don't think fixing it for women, with a bias towards womens' needs, is likely to result in any greater outcome for men than "the old way" (which many men also had issues with).

What I originally wanted to say in this comment was that I think the commenter above is arguing in good faith and believes that it makes logical sense to resolve these issues for women and the same corrections will apply by default to men, but I have no faith that this would be the actual result when whatever the perceived required corrections are got implemented.

I finished up the old version of this comment with this, and I think it's still relevant here:

Women like this feel they've lost what they had in youth, but men have to live with what they didn't have (and so lost the opportunity to ever have) in youth.

That makes a difference in how the person perceives their chances, their value, their entire life history and future prospects, and therefore affects the required solution.

[–]Carkudo 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

The other commenter is saying that's it's acceptable to erase incel men by equating their problems to the "problems" of women who forgo sex and relationships because they dislike their options. The commenter's reasoning is that it's acceptable because he has a vague hunch that something in the article is potentially beneficial to incels in the future and because involuntary celibacy is not a big deal. Except, it is a big fucking deal and any beneficial rhetoric cannot excuse the absolutely evil act of erasing incels likeb that.

[–]bottleblank 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Sure, and apologies if you didn't see the new version of my comment, I wasn't happy with it for exactly this reason. I believe you're right. I'm not on top of my writing game this morning.

All I really meant to say about the comment in question was that I think, although flawed, the commenter does believe in the logic that resolving the issues they highlighted for women would also go some way to resolving them for men (not fearmongering and starting movements like #metoo, for example). I don't think that's an entirely unreasonable stance, although I do agree with you that it's unlikely to actually result in a useful change for men who already struggled. It does seem slanted - yet again - towards the idea that women have it bad. Even if they spent the first half of their life having it good, which is something many men don't have the luxury of having experienced, but we don't talk about them in the same way.

I also agree that there's a massive difference between just being picky or not liking that you're "past your prime" versus having never had a chance in the first place, but I covered that better in a different comment.

[–]Carkudo 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

although flawed, the commenter does believe in the logic

Yeah, I figured as much, but that's the second half of his problem - it's not logic, it's literally a hunch.

[–]Maldevinine 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The other commenter is saying that's it's acceptable to erase incel men by equating their problems to the "problems" of women who forgo sex and relationships because they dislike their options.

No I'm not.

I'm saying that now that we've got people admitting that lack of sex and relationships is a problem, and that there is an acknowledgement that the lack comes from systematic social issues, it's a much shorter step to get them to go "men are suffering in the same way and that's where incels come from. Now I have empathy."

[–]bottleblank 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't think, now that I've read the article and thought about it, that that's what's going to happen though. When has it happened with other issues? When do people see these "issues women face" stories and think "men face these too, we should fix it for everybody"?

The article itself goes out of its way to say "men are violent", "men don't care", "men are emotionless sex machines". That's a pretty big clue in itself. This article wants to fix it for women. It doesn't seem to care about the fact that men have these issues too, other than brief but dismissive mentions. It focusses purely, as many of these articles do, on how much women need support in this, and to hell with men because they're ungrateful, unfeeling, violent bastards.

[–]Carkudo 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So you finally gave your hunch a rationalisation and it's just wrong. This is by far not the first article that treats women's high standards as something that the world and men are inflicting upon them. Come on, seriously, you think this is the first ever such take in the history of humanity? Really?

[–]BrokeMacMountain 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

gender neutral? from the guardian? are you new here? lol

The guardian is a toxic feminist man hating rag. I read it for 20 years before it turned to shit. Pitty really, because it was at one time a pretty good paper.

[–]griii2right-wing guest 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The whole article is absolute trainwreck, but these are my two top moments:

​

“I’m not conventionally attractive and I never get approached by men,” she says.

OMG, she is clearly willing to get approached! What is wrong with all the men, why are they not approaching her? The suffering must be unbearable!

​

​

Jane, 49, has been single for eight years and celibate for five. Although she would love to have a sex life, she is not prepared to compromise her principles by seeking a casual relationship

She is literally doing everything humanly possible to have a sex life, except maybe for hooking up with men. Being femcel is so dam hard!

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter