Something I keep noticing, whenever someone says something that someone else doesn't like the latter person will always be like "do you have any proof? I want to see statistics/sources, otherwise you're full of shit and I have no reason to believe you".

Example: red pillers come together, exchange ideas and experiences, come to generalized conclusions based on shared experiences and observations, red piller makes a proclamation online (hypergamy,AWALT, AF/BB,etc), blue pillers come out in full forces demanding "proof" or "statistics", if red piller doesn't provide then blue pillers conclude red piller shouldn't be taken seriously.

This is stupid because the things that we discuss on this sub are things that aren't exactly studied and measured by government agencies, you really think the govt or anyone else cares about recording N-counts or 80/20? What's funny though is that sometimes proof can be provided (such as the tinder 80/20 studies, marriage and divorce rates, the real number of sexual assaults, etc) and how do the naysayers respond? They say things like "these stats are unreliable/unofficial/inconclusive or some other shit that cops out of the argument while assuming a position of righteousness. So matter what you can't win. People here are not willing to actually debate and learn new ideas but rather to hear what they want to hear and throw at the other side because they don't like having their beliefs challenged.

Bonus question: who's more guilty of this, red or blue pillers?