The "Slut Double Standard"

FuriousMouse · 2014-01-09T09:32:23+00:00

This is basically a more detailed version of the humorous explanation that "a key which opens many locks" is a good key, but a "lock which can be opened by many keys" is of low value.

The woman has the "lock" and must be selective in which "key" opens her, in order to protect herself from becoming pregnant from a low value male. Which could have life threatening consequences for her.

deptii · 2014-01-09T05:55:06+00:00

TL;DR

Nemester · 2014-01-09T14:50:48+00:00

Another thing to keep in mind is that Men don't usually engage in open slut shaming. In general, their goal is to sleep with many women, even the sluts. Shaming them does not advance that aim. In the process of game, one of the man's operations is to minimize his target feeling like a slut.

Open slut shaming, and most slut shaming in general, is initiated and pushed by women. Sex has a market value, and women want to maximize what they can obtain from it. Sluts flood the market and lower the value, which in turn reduces what all women can obtain from it. Slut shaming is the process by which the female trade union tries to reduce the number of scabs.

Sethora · 2014-01-09T16:10:18+00:00

the short version of this idea that Ive always used is the fact that approaching and attracting is a distinct skill that has to be learned, towards women. Women don't have to spend years honing any real skill to attract someone, so its only fair that men are seen as heroes for their conquests while women are viewed as sluts. They didn't have to put up with all the social barriers that could prevent an approach. They are living bait where as men have to actually produce bait.

Kwizkey · 2014-01-09T14:28:37+00:00

"Amy Lorenzo

then shouldn't ugly fat women who sleep around be called sluts, and attractive women who sleep around be tolerated? attractive women don't get their looks naturally, they work for hours daily in the gym, then they have to give up junk food, then they have to spend all their money on hair, skin, and makeup products. attractive women earn the right to sleep around, they've worked hard for it, let them sleep around if they want to. the one's who put in no effort at all can be called sluts."

Where does she draw this shit from?

Lipophobicity · 2014-01-09T07:27:44+00:00

reminds me of one of my favorite expressions:

"A key that can open any lock is a damn good key, a lock that can be opened by any key is a terrible lock. "

jacks1000 · 2014-01-09T20:53:51+00:00

The "double standard" is simple - women like slutty men. They call slutty men "studs" and sex them up. I guess it's pre-selection. Women generally speaking hate virgin men.

So, tell the women to stop having sex with sluts and there won't be any double standard.

birdwontquit · 2014-01-09T06:25:28+00:00

Wouldn't the invention of birth control nullify the entire first paragraph of women? Also what if a woman was a slut with tons of top-tier alpha males?

TRPACC · 2014-01-09T13:39:17+00:00

According to the various studies on it, the double standard doesn't actually exist in practice and both men and have equal levels of dislike for men and women that have more partners relative to themselves.

http://feck-blog.blogspot.ie/2011/03/slutty-studs.html

SILENTSAM69 · 2014-01-09T15:27:06+00:00

Besides this line of reasoning I have heard something else on the issue lately.

The reality is that most men are not sleeping with a lot of women. Just as the very idea of alpha male entails being on top, there are not a lot up there.

So when women say they are just acting like men, or being equal, or whatever by sleeping around "like men" they are not. They are treating the exception as the rule, or maybe I should say the exceptional as the standard.

This is more directed that those who sleep around in the name of equality than the traditional girl who just doesn't have standards. They do not see that they are demonstrating the very nature of the inherent inequality.

We_Are_Legion · 2014-01-09T15:27:02+00:00

[permanently deleted]

SgtSplacker · 2014-01-09T18:32:16+00:00

I don't know why everyone ignores the link between sex and money. Plain and simple a girl should not expect a man to pay her way if her intentions are not romantic with the male. To me it's like she is asking to be cared for, yet she does not want to do her part to care for the man in the most important/ideal way to him.

puaSenator · 2014-01-09T17:23:47+00:00

Women are the gatekeepers of sex, so it's the man's job to figure out how to get sex. The more gatekeepers you're able to get through, obviously, the higher value man you are. It makes sense as to why "studs" are celebrated in society because it's a reflection on their value. Meanwhile, gatekeepers that are just giving it away to even the weakest of men are naturally regarded as weak and slutty. They lack little regard to their reproductive responsibility. They've failed to do the one thing expected of them. Naturally, they are regarded as lesser.

salami_inferno · 2014-01-09T07:25:58+00:00

I disagree with this. Some chicks really do just enjoy a lot of sex, it's not necessarily a bad thing.

CptDefB · 2014-01-09T07:09:29+00:00

[permanently deleted]

NitzXL · 2014-01-09T13:34:48+00:00

But when you don't have to work for the lay and fuck sluts or bitches that give you IOIs or every single one that opens you, then you are a slut. Because all you have to do is say no or yes, like most women would.

Title	The "Slut Double Standard"
Author	The_BitterTruth
Upvotes	139
Comments	127
Date	January 9, 2014 4:52 AM UTC (12 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1urwfb/the_slut_double_standard/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/the-slut-double-standard.9787 https://theredarchive.com/post/9787

Comments