TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

So basically, I get to play babysitter with some woman’s tuilithe gan disciplín, and in return, I might occasionally get starfish sex? Incredible! Sign me up!

Maximum-Complaint-68

November 12, 2021
173 upvotes
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
https://postimg.cc/gallery/qznpKnp
Archived from /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen is a community dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title So basically, I get to play babysitter with some woman’s tuilithe gan disciplín, and in return, I might occasionally get starfish sex? Incredible! Sign me up!
Author

Maximum-Complaint-68

Upvotes 173
Comments 66
Date November 12, 2021 4:08 AM UTC
(4 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen/comments/qs2zuo/so_basically_i_get_to_play_babysitter_with_some/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen/so-basically-i-get-to-play-babysitter-with-some.1084569
https://theredarchive.com/post/1084569
Top posts by Maximum-Complaint-68

Hilarious that a feminist is expecting a sub to be open to her idiocy. Has she never been on ANY feminist sub? I do not think there are any that allow a free discussion.

4012 upvotes
September 9, 2021
/r/PussyPassDenied

This describes a good handful of the abarlacha that get featured on this sub

757 upvotes
August 7, 2021
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

Tell everyone here that you’re an straip without directly saying you’re an straip

657 upvotes
November 2, 2021
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

I 100% guarantee that feminists would swipe right on a child-raping, Nazi-sympathising Chad. Political views somehow seem to fall by the wayside when you whip out an bod capall 8-orlach!

546 upvotes
December 31, 2021
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

What’s the matter, honey? I thought charging $5 to show your brollaigh to the world and shoving things up your coinín made you an empowered woman?! LOL 😹😹😹😹

416 upvotes
December 10, 2021
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

We're out here dodging bullets. Who the fuck would want to be with a woman that thinks like this?!

386 upvotes
May 7, 2022
/r/AntiFeminists

Josef Stalin called. He wants his red flags back from this leibide págánach! Congratulations, you're everything a self-respecting man doesn't want: a single mother, more baggage than a Boeing 747, physically unfit, an alcoholic, into New Age legbeard shit and positively insane!

353 upvotes
December 23, 2021
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

Imagine waiting to cheat on your husband after becoming an stiúsaí fealltach with a bad case of tingles. Jesus Christ.

302 upvotes
December 3, 2021
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

Comments

[–]ArchDemonKerensky 129 points130 points131 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

someone that treats your kids like his own? sounds like their father.

[–]loneliness-incLvL 99 Rogue NiceGuy™ 42 points43 points44 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

someone that treats your kids like his own? sounds like their father.

Fathers are LITERALLY tools of the patriarchy!!!

Ohmygaaawd! I'm like LITERALLY shaking right now.

[–]xtcj88 20 points21 points22 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s absolutely baffling. 🤦‍♂️

[+]maruadventurer 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sadly, some women may not know who the 'father' is due to their weekend bed hopping.

[–]houseoftolstoyUnchivalrous Christian 85 points86 points87 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

wanting a nice guy who will treat my kids like his Own

In all fairness, there is a way to find this kind of man. There is one very important step to take with a nice guy in order to make sure that he will treat the kids as his own. That is: have the kids actually be his own.

Crazy? I know! There's this thing called biology that causes men to be invested far more into a child if his genes are present in the child. Not that it will always work, but if you make sure that you have a good man who is trustworthy and reliable before you jump into bed with him, it greatly mitigates the issue.

This woman, like many others, did things in the wrong order. Only now when she has another man's child(ren) does she start looking for a "nice guy" to be the father figure to her children. Had she possessed any consideration for her offspring and the man she is hoping will enter the picture, she would not have ended up pregnant with another man. Instead, she would seek out a good and reliable man when she is childless. But this concept appears to be lost with so many women. When they wonder why they cannot find a good man, it is because they did not prioritize looking for him when it was most important.

[–]OverkillengineCasts Pearls to the Swine 32 points33 points34 points 4 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

it is because they did not prioritize looking for him when it was most important.

And they know damn well that it is important but for generations now they have been able to fob the responsibility for keeping Chad's bastards alive off onto the rest of society. Which is enslavement by proxy.

[+]SmallHandsMallMindSrights for sandwiches! 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They, and chad. Its the Feudal system returned

[–]finger_milk 21 points22 points23 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I love it when I ask a woman why she isn't constantly in and out of random men's beds, and she says "I want a deep connection and I want it to matter. I want to have kids with someone I love"

I love it when they say that. It really tells me just how far away from that reality we are now, where single motherhood is advocated.

[–]loneliness-incLvL 99 Rogue NiceGuy™ 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There's this thing called biology that causes men to be invested far more into a child if his genes are present in the child.

Biology is a tool of the patriarchy and that's muh soggy knees stick hate speech!!!

Not that it will always work, but if you make sure that you have a good man who is trustworthy and reliable before you jump into bed with him, it greatly mitigates the issue.

Also, if she treats him well, her chances of it working rise significantly.

[+]mrmudzi 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Your stepdad beat you too?

[–]slipkid223 39 points40 points41 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Get yerself a fattie with kids

[–]One-Move 40 points41 points42 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

My kids? More than one at 21 😱

[–]Sea_Chocolate9166 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

But you'll have to wear a condom tho.

[–]NBA_MSG 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Why start now?

[–]Sea_Chocolate9166 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I m not saying that, its single moms who say that.

[–]Jbr74 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Tip #1: For young single mom's get a vasectomy and wear a condom (preferably 2).

[–]ZZoMBiEXIII 36 points37 points38 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ugh. I wrote a longer post, but it became a meandering ramble.

I'll instead just post this one sentence. I feel bad for the poor kid. Good luck, little bastard (dictionary definition, not an insult). I hope you can beat the odds.

[–]Ok_Management4634 32 points33 points34 points 4 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

The stupid teddy bear filter (or whatever the hell it is) really helps convince me she's ready for a mature adult relationship now.. lol

Smart men don't raise other men's kids.. For god's sake..

This was a good tag -- "Dual Mating Strategy".. I wish all men would refuse to raise Chad's baby.. The maybe "Alpha F---" would not be so attractive ..

[–]OverkillengineCasts Pearls to the Swine 29 points30 points31 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

We'd need to gut the welfare system for any real change to happen.

[–]loneliness-incLvL 99 Rogue NiceGuy™ 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

We'd need to gut the welfare system for any real change to happen.

True, but this will never ever happen as long as women vote.

[–]Ok_Management4634 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Yes, or at bare minimum, as a first step.. Stop rewarding single moms for having more kids.. Giving them more money as a reward for having extra kids is a huge problem. I would prefer to gut the welfare system too, but at least reform it so that women don't have 6 kids out of wedlock at the taxpayers expense. If single moms had the same welfare payment whether they had 1 or 10 kids, it would discourage unlimited irresponsible breeding.

But yea, women being the majority of voters is a huge reason why this country is going down the toilet.

[–]HeftyAdministration8Sr. Hamster Analyst 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

"An increase in the influence of women in public life has often been associated with national decline. The later Romans complained that, although Rome ruled the world, women ruled Rome. In the tenth century, a similar tendency was observable in the Arab Empire . . .

Soon after this period, government and public order collapsed, and foreign invaders overran the country. The resulting increase in confusion and violence made it unsafe for women to move unescorted in the streets, with the result that this feminist movement collapsed."

  • Sir John Glubb, The Fate of Empires

[–]lurkerhasarisen10 points 4 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong. - Thomas Sowell

The simple fact is that men have military obligations and women do not, and the average man is a net lifelong taxpayer and the average woman is a net lifelong tax recipient. There are exceptions both ways, but in the main, women voters pay no price for voting in their personal interests rather than the best interests of the nation. Sexist? Okay... but it's factually true.

There are a number of ways to fix this system that don't require voting to be based on genitalia. One fairly easy and innocuous way would be to make registering for the draft optional, but required for voting, along with a law that stated that a certain percentage of people who registered would be conscripted at random, perhaps with that number increasing whenever the Congress passed any sort of use-of-force resolution or the President ordered a military strike. No waivers allowed at that point. The actual number of conscriptions wouldn't even have to be large... it would just have to be a non-trivial number greater than zero.

Nobody who didn't volunteer would ever be drafted, but everyone who accepted the power to vote would know that there's a chance they might have to serve.

There's no need to have the government sort out the "voting citizens" from the mere "non-voting residents"... force those who would vote to put some skin in the game and they would do it themselves. The Democrat Party would probably cease to exist.

[–]Ok_Management4634 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

yea and perhaps when you register for the draft, you have a mandatory 1 or 2 year term in the military, and then more time in the reserves, as some countries do it (Isreal, South Korea, Sweden.. I think that is accurate, and I Am sure there are more). Only then, do you earn the right to vote.

Good idea.

[+]skinny1penis 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Welfare sucks and keeps people poor I agree with this! Let's replace it with a system that helps and encourages people to want to earn more.

[–]loneliness-incLvL 99 Rogue NiceGuy™[M] 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

 I wish all men would refuse to raise Chad's baby.. The maybe "Alpha F---" would not be so attractive ..

Nature will always be nature. Women find certain traits to be attractive regardless of men's actions. Stop blaming men for women's poor choices.

You're wishing that nature were different. That's silly.

[–]Typo-MAGAshivasshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

It's like when my wife wishes our cats didn't wantonly slaughter all the cute wittle animals.

Their every instinct drives them to do it.

[–]Ok_Management4634 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

True. good analogy. Women's instinct is to extract value out of men (money, Chad's seed) and then toss them aside the minute that something slightly better appears as a potential option.. Not all women act on their impulses, but many do.

[–]Typo-MAGAshivasshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

then toss them aside the minute that something slightly better appears as a potential option.

If she manages to snag a man who answers her hypergamous question/worry ("is he the best I can do?"), if she thinks that, YES, he certainly is, she'll truly have eyes only for him and other men become invisible.

Thing is, this isn't a once-and-done deal. She's constantly reevaluating on a subconscious level.

If the guy gets fat and lazy, or if he beta-izes himself too much (I did that, in a misguided attempt to make her happy), she'll inevitably lose attraction.

She won't necessarily cheat or end the relationship, but she'll certainly make the guy's life suck unless he finds the Red Pill and turns it around.

[–]loneliness-incLvL 99 Rogue NiceGuy™ 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

If she manages to snag a man who answers her hypergamous question/worry ("is he the best I can do?"), if she thinks that, YES, he certainly is, she'll truly have eyes only for him and other men become invisible.

No sir, that isn't true. There is nothing that a man can do to convince her to have eyes only for him. Regardless of how awesome of a husband, lover, provider, frame holder, etc that he is - another man can be super hawt to her in the moment, for a million reasons.

Only she alone can make the conscious choice, to be so satisfied with the man she has, that she shuts out all others.

[–]Typo-MAGAshivasshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

There is nothing that a man can do to convince her to have eyes only for him

Where did I ever say that? :)

As Rollo Tomassi says, you cannot negotiate genuine desire.

However, what a man becomes and continues becoming is our part. Her conscious choice to be satisfied can be overruled by her instincts if her husband gets fat, beta-izes himself, etc. As I said previously, she won't necessarily cheat or leave, but she will make the man's life suck.

A woman should honor her commitment no matter what the man does, but they frequently don't. Our current laws and culture encourage them to leave and get cash and prizes for doing so. And as Thomas Hobbes said, "covenants without the sword are mere words".

For my part, my life has gotten a lot better since I found the Red Pill and stopped beta-izing myself. Frame control works. Dread works. Still providing beta-comfort without overdoing it works.

Thing is, if I had married a woman of lesser character, she'd have cheated or left before I turned things around. Hell, lesser women did it to my buds while we were in Iraq.

Her conscious decisions and her character matter, but so do our actions (though what men do or don't do isn't the focus here).

[–]mike30171 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Thank you for your service!

[–]Typo-MAGAshivasshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thanks for the thanks!

[–]loneliness-incLvL 99 Rogue NiceGuy™ 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Their every instinct drives them to do it.

Yes, instincts drive the actions of the cat.

But instincts need not drive the actions of the woman. As an adult human, she has the ability to choose right from wrong. She is therefore responsible for her own poor choices.

My point to u/Ok_Management4634 was that the woman's desires are part of nature. It's silly to bemoan nature itself.

[–]Typo-MAGAshivasshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But instincts need not drive the actions of the woman. As an adult human, she has the ability to choose right from wrong. She is therefore responsible for her own poor choices

Agreed.

Just like one of men's instincts is to "defend m'lady!", but we can suppress it for our own good (hey, like rules 2 and 3 on the sidebar!), women can suppress their worst instincts, both for their own good and the good of society.

Too bad so few of them do that.

[–]Ok_Management4634 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm not blaming men. I guess you could interpret it that way, based on how I wrote that.

I wish Women were not bailed out. This is other men, the government, etc.

In other words, being a single mom should be super hard. They should be shamed. Being a single stay at home mom on the dole should not be an option. A woman leaving a good husband because she's "bored" and wants to ride the CC should be shamed.. Instead, all forms of single mom is now celebrated as if they are some kind of a hero.

As far as nature being different, I think the tide is turning. Forums like this help. Youtube channels help. Men are starting to learn that they are better off with no girlfriend/wife than a single mom or a bad woman.. Most of us were brainwashed to think that women were good by nature. Now we have resources like Rollo's book to tell us how women really are. Also, I think a lot of young men that are teens and college aged, they saw their crazy mom break up their family and now are going to be more cautious.. So there is hope for men being educated. Men are logical, they learn from their mistakes. For example, once men realize that a second marriage has about a 2/3 chance of divorce, they will realize that their first divorce wasn't a fluke, it's the norm.

Will women's nature ever change? Doubtful in the USA, because their bad behavior is enabled. IF that's what you meant, then I Agree.

[–]AngryCockOfJusticeHarbinger of Dom Play, Purveyor of Skirts, Paragon of Hoe Tricks 23 points24 points25 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

The moment you'll treat her kids as their own is the moment you're in the hook for child support.

[–]PopularBug5Jr. Hamster Analyst 18 points19 points20 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The moment she SAHMs herself is the moment you're gonna be fucked hard and painful when the inevitable divorce rape comes.

[–]upsidedownbackwardsI like a nithe rathberry thpritzther 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Don't forget that you'll be paying for her Monat inventory the whole time she's fucking someone else in your bed. Because leaving her alone all day to go to work is abuse. And not paying for her MLM is abuse. But not earning enough money is also abuse.

[–]PopularBug5Jr. Hamster Analyst 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not hiring a maid while your wife is SAHMing is also abuse, don't forget.

[–]Extension-Soil-620 19 points20 points21 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

21 and Single mom, dumb filter, and overweight.

Catch her now boys !!

[–]Sea_Chocolate9166 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So much filter still she looks older than 50

[–]PirateDocBrown 22 points23 points24 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No fats, no brats. She loses.

[+]vegasbadboy702 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A 21 year old single mother with kids but who can’t or won’t be with the father but wants some other guy to step in to treat them like his own. Right. Just run men.

[–]Glittering-Meat3088 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'd rather double fist tasers and zap myself in the nipples.

[–]jor4288 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Points for creativity

[–]Flashy_Glove6208 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's a very long way alone from 21 till the day you die.

[–]lorum_ipsum_dolorJr. Hamster Analyst 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Depends on the lifestyle.

[–]Maximum-Complaint-68Uses Irish lingo in post titles[S] 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Béarla - Gaelige Translation:

  • tuilithe gan disciplín = "undisciplined bastards"

[–]rmgrugby 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You are without a doubt my favorite poster here. I'm learning so many new words!

[–]LenyAK 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

To be fair, the bastard is still a baby.

[–]PopularBug5Jr. Hamster Analyst 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

21 going on 50.

[–]AldabruzzoNo busted Pillsbury biscuit cans 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Baby mama, here looking for sex if you're hawt. But what I need is a walking wallet for me to use, exploit, take advantage of, bleed dry, and then toss away the dessicated husk when he's completely tapped out.

This has got to be like the 25th time I've written this. This has to be like the 25th profile I've seen on here like this.

Are you guys seeing the patterns yet? Can you read between the lines on these yet?

Are you getting it? Can you see it?

[–]AdderallAllTheTime3 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The liar

The baby

and the propensity of this crazy

[–]PaulMurrayCbr 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Helps to know some Australian slang. 'Root' means 'fuck', but with connotations. People fuck. Dogs root.

[–]Typo-MAGAshivasshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Seems sort of similar to the German "essen" which means "to eat" and "fressen" which as I understand means "to devour like an animal".

So if they say "du frißt wie ein Schwein!" then it's truly insulting.

(I don't know enough about the subtle differences between their words for fuck (ficken, vögeln, and bumsen) to compare, so I went with this.)

[–]paristeta 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Someone that treats my kids as his own

So...like the father, pump her and then dump her and the kid?

[–]ProfitgluttonThot-ese translator 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No way she’s 21

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

unless those kids are dogs, that shit aint gonna happen.

[–]Typo-MAGAshivasshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. [M] 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We've had this one before. I distinctly remember the teddy bear filter and the phrase "not here for a root".

Butt it's been a long enough time to allow it again.

[–]Joh_Ghurtfather to a great artist 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

wanting a nice guy who treats my kids like his own

Chad: I squirt my potential kids down any willing throat. Where should I squirt your kids down?

Tyrone: I don't pay child-support for any of my children, I don't even know their name. I'll do the same with yours.

This wish would make good material for another episode of "Be careful what you wish for, you might get it!"

[–]WalnutManTrader 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

The moment I read the words “nice guy” I almost busted a gut at work laughing

[–]BlogginginvicecitySr. Hamster Analyst 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nice guys cannot be trusted! Except to raise kids that are not their own!!/s

[–]polishknightusaSr. Winged Hussar 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Reading the below comments and between the lines, here's a 21 year old woman with multiple kids. She at least is young (or claims to be) but aside from that, wants the highest demand from a man (treat someone else's kids as his own) while providing nothing. She likes music and coffee, which isn't as snotty as some profiles we've seen here but nonetheless, she has provided absolutely nothing but a defiled albeit young womb.

It's hard to say what may have happened, we have little to go on. Perhaps she married her secondary school sweetheart, had two kids with him, found him using drugs and booted him. Or maybe she rode the CC and got off of it young. Or maybe she just booted the guy because she wasn't getting "tinglies". In the past, some women like this would have come up on the market but they at least would have had the brains to offer SOMETHING more than just baggage. Perhaps she'd say she cooks and just say she has kids, but not demand anything right away.

In any case, Roosh law is that if a woman mentions sex in any context upon first meeting/profile, even in denial "no hook ups" means she has and will continue to hook up.

[–]tiernach 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

By starfish sex I thought you meant anal. I was expecting a dating profile where a woman was offering anal if you watched her kids. Before finding this subreddit I would have never thought that possible but now that is exactly what I expected to see.

[–]BlogginginvicecitySr. Hamster Analyst 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Kids plural???? 😱🤮

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter