~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
pfizerface
[–][deleted] 169 points170 points171 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
You can always come back here for some upvotes :)
“Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.”
[–]Embarrassed-Call-925 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is essentially people who thought the Earth was flat 600 years ago dunking on people who thought it was round. Well, MOST people think the Earth is flat ergo the Earth is flat.
So if you were ever wondering the difference between "smart money" and "dumb money" on Wall St, this is essentially it. The majority consistently get taken to the cleaners while the few on top reap the rewards of their collective stupidity.
[–]Nihi1986 97 points98 points99 points 4 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link
Not surprised...many subs auto ban men's right subscribers, of course it's basically an 'incel' site for them and therefore some use it as an insult.
Do not expect any kind of empathy, you are men and you know what that means.
[–]motoko_urashima 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
I don't think there's such a thing as autoban based on your subbreddits. I mean, I can still view a couple of the nasty feminist ones, I just checked. ...but I never go there, never comment, why would I want to?
[–]Yithar 22 points23 points24 points 4 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
Generally the auto-bans don't restrict you from viewing the subreddits. Check r/offmychest to see if you can post there. I'm not sure if they auto-ban for this sub there though.
EDIT: I tested it and I don't think r/offmychest bans for posting here. I know they definitely ban for posting in /r/KotakuInAction . If you want to test this, I recommend posting in r/offmychest first, because otherwise you won't get the ban message.
[–]Ill_Fisherman8352 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'm pretty sure they do. Seeing as I did the moment I posted here.
[–]Nihi1986 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I can see every sub but can't post in many, even before posting for the first time due to auto ban. Not only men's rights, I'm also subscribed to purple pill debate which isn't even entirely 'manosphere' as the point is the healthy debate between two ideologies, and got banned from many subs just for being subscribed to that sub too.
I honestly feel like some subs don't even check what these places are about they just think 'uggh...men!' (purple pill has tons of women, Ironically) and ban go brrrr.
[–]blazedagamer 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
You can, I see people being banned all the time simply for being part of or simply commenting on conservative subs.
[–]chance080 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I myself am a moderate but lean more conservative in my values and principles. I’ve had the same experience on Reddit.
Almost makes me wanna make a worm to go eat some of these bots up and disrupt their deletion of information and spreading of misinformation.
[–]scyth3s[🍰] 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I don't think there's such a thing as autoban based on your subbreddits
Oh there definitely is. It's called shadowbanning, and it'll happen to you if you try to comment on the wrong sub and an auto mod checks your history or in some cases they have a web scraper that periodically checks this sub and bans you before you even know the other sub exists.
[–]matrixislife 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
A shadowban is something only the admins can do, it lets you post comments as usual but no one else gets to see it unless a mod or admin authorises the post. Autobans from bots exist, as mentioned /r/offmychest does that for posters here, the trick being you need to post here. Just viewing content won't activate the bot.
[–]tenchineuro 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
A shadowban is something only the admins can do, it lets you post comments as usual but no one else gets to see it unless a mod or admin authorises the post.
Actually, r/mensrights will often tell commenters that they have been shadowbaned. But it's easy enough to check, make a post or comment, log out and look for that post or comment. If you're shadowbanned, you won't see it.
[–]0utsid3r1620 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I was basnec from at least 3 so s Ihad never heard of or been to and found out after they were mentioned here a d I tried to go to them
[–]omidoggo 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I am pretty sure fds bans u if u participate and ure a male. Lmfao
[–]MDFMK 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Exactly and their political spectacle and for show win to ban and remove mgtow content because to got to big shows they knows what’s up and men’s rights groups and advocacy are next.
It’s so sad that can only divide.
[–]PhillipZimbargo 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I was banned from r/offmychest for incel/RedPill affiliations. Basically using this sub. Don’t even think I’m a member of r/mensrights, lemme check real quick.
[–]TraehNoil 22 points23 points24 points 4 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link
Truthfully women don’t know how to take no for an answer, or take rejection. Every time I’ve said no or rejected them, they turn into a 4 year old and throw a temper tantrum.
[–]pfizerface[S] 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
So true, if you reject them you are the asshole.
[–]chance080 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Dude I’ve caught cases for rejecting women before.
Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.
[–]TraehNoil 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Ain’t it some bullshit man?
[–]chance080 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It is some bullshit. Just for anyone else who reads this: NO JUSTICE COMES TO THOSE WHO ARE FALSELY ACCUSED, REGARDLESS OF IF YOU’RE ACQUITTED.
The feminists made sure of that one. If they really cared about rape victims, they’d care about all of them, not just the women, but men too. And they MOST CERTAINLY would fight against false accusers as they only hurt the actual victims of sexual assault and rape.
[–]TraehNoil 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Facts
[–]pfizerface[S] 148 points149 points150 points 4 years ago (43 children) | Copy Link
Twice in 2 days already...
[–]xm791 123 points124 points125 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
This also happened to me, even in subreddits that did not have anything to do with feminism etc. Reddit ist just full of authleft stalkers.
https://www.reddit.com/r/starterpacks/comments/q22r1w/dating_advice_starter_pack/hfilz1y?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3
[–]geocitiesuser 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Check your stalkers histories, most likely they are posting your info in one of their many "circle jerk" subs that seem to be "allowed" by the reddit admins.
[+]EnvironmentalWar4627 -78 points-77 points-76 points 4 years ago (40 children) | Copy Link
It was a video of 2 drunk guys aggressively refusing to leave a woman alone... and you posted
Probably just some drunks trying to hit on some girls. She decided to film the interaction and reject them harshly for fun, then posted it on social media to further their embarrassment and feelings of rejection.
When men are refusing to respect women, attacking the women instead of the men is going to get you downvoted.
And clearly mens rights has a bad reputation in the public. Part of that is from users defending terrible men and attacking women that just want to be left alone.
You're adding to the problem.
[–]xm791 50 points51 points52 points 4 years ago* (14 children) | Copy Link
I wouldn't say it has a bad reputation in the public, but reddit is in general extremely socially liberal. People on this platform hate MensRights simply for the reason that it's a subreddit that is primarily about men's issue and different from platform like r/menslib which is more about transrights and feminism than about MensRights (you see this when you look at their top posts of all time) .
[+]EnvironmentalWar4627 -40 points-39 points-38 points 4 years ago* (13 children) | Copy Link
People don't seem to have a problem with left wing male advocates. Or mens mental health. Or mens lib as you mentioned. Those are all primarily about mens issues.
And the top posts in the last month from mens lib were about the lived experience of black men, whether or not women understand the male experience, and and important message about how no one should touch you without consent.
Edit: and also body image issues that men struggle with. An important topic.
Transrights and feminism didn't even come up.
[–]xm791 52 points53 points54 points 4 years ago* (9 children) | Copy Link
The fact is, those posts are basically not really about men's issues and mostly about what feminist think men's issues should be about. 30% of the user on that sub are feminist women from r/TwoXChromosomes.
[+]EnvironmentalWar4627 -27 points-26 points-25 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Body image issues, issues with being a black man, and women not understanding male issues...aren't really about men's issues?
2 of those are issues I as a man deal with. But I'm not black.
[–]Marcuspie 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Hey you seem to be nitpicking in this sub constantly only responding whenever you think there is something wrong, if you have a good idea of what a mens right issue is why don't you post something as an OP for a change instead of always criticising every single thing?
I'm not saying you do it on every post but you seem to look out more for the people who attack the mens rights supporters then actually supporting mens rights yourself.
[+]EnvironmentalWar4627 -10 points-9 points-8 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Cleaning this sub up will do far more for mens rights than anything else. This sub is the face of men's rights.
When someone wants to know what mens rights are, and they type mensrights into the search this sub will be what they see. And I want it to be better.
[–]Marcuspie 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
But when you only come out of the woodworks to correct people and never are out here when you think something is positive, you could maybe change the odds in your favor all you do is complain from what i have seen of you. I mean no disrespect but i feel you are going about it the wrong way there hasn't been any positivity coming from you, and you give a vibe of that everything posted here is wrong. Then you shouldn't be here.
[–]chance080 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
We’re all here because we’ve all faced similar adversity and struggle my guy. Some of us are just in different stages of dealing with it. Why can’t men be emotional and angry sometimes? Because we get shit down by women, as well as other men pandering to said women.
The only cleaning this sub needs is when hateful rhetoric is spewed, which is not that often when compared to the majority of the feminist subs. Why don’t you go tell them to clean house first and then we’ll follow suit?
[–]EnvironmentalWar4627 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Because I don't care about feminism. Feminism only helps women and I'm not a woman.
[–]tenchineuro 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Cleaning this sub up will do far more for mens rights than anything else.
Define 'cleaning this sub up'.
And it won't make any difference, this is just another concern troll, except that this concern troll can break the karma rules and post no matter how much negative karma he gets here.
[–]Panderjit_SinghVV 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Those are distractions. Pretend issues meant to hide the real problem.
Fundamental human rights for men are the issue; everything else flows from that.
It's really interesting that your comment karma has been stuck at -100 for the last 4 days, or at least that was when I first checked, and this post alone has -24 karma. I'm not gonna bother to add them up, but I'm sure that you have more than -100 karma in this post alone.
So are you a mod of someplace? Are the admins fixing things so you can post no matter how low your karma is on this sub?
Please, explain it to me, I'd love to hear it.
[–]sakura_drop 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
People don't seem to have a problem with left wing male advocates
Not so much. Anecdotally I've seen it be disregarded in favour of Mens Lib in other subs when the topic arises. Speaking of which:
Or mens lib as you mentioned
Could it be because that sub kowtows to feminist dogma? Take a look at the subreddit overlap of its users, particularly the top results, for example.
Let's take a look at their top posts of the week shall we? The first, highest voted thread with a silver award is about women's experiences of being harassed by men. On a supposedly pro-men sub about men's issues and rights. From the thread's creator: "it is extremely easy to find stories in women's spaces about the first time they noticed men staring at them, or standing too close, or obscure uncles taking too long giving them hugs. This is very very common for women. Sooooo... let's not do that?"
This user is the mod who once apologised to a female rapist for her experience, which is arguably the tip of the iceberg when it comes to that sub as you can see among the numerous examples here. A fairly recent one comes to mind when they saw fit to do an AMA with Chuck Derry, co-founder of Gender Violence Institute and the Minnesota Men's Action Network, who basically believes men cannot be victims of domestic violence and follows the Duluth Model way of thinking to an extreme degree.
The second most upvoted thread is 'Dating as a black man and the triple dose of toxic masculinity.' Scroll down a little to number seven: 'Men need positive spaces and a Men's Liberation movement under the umbrella of Feminism.' Scroll down a little more to find a double awarded link to a YouTube video promoting the 'feminine gaze' as a positive alternative to the dreaded 'male gaze' in media. Even the topics that appear to be positive usually tell a different story if you actually read the comments.
How about MensLib's top posts of all time? Three of the top five - again, of all time - are about trans rights. And even looking through the top ten, I'm not seeing the greatest examples of discussions of the most pressing issues men face.
Of course this is the one that routinely gets recommended elsewhere on reddit as the "good" mens sub.
[–]reddut_gang 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
feminists in particular take issue with leftwingmaleadvocates, calling it misogynistic and stuff like that.
Or mens lib as you mentioned. Those are all primarily about mens issues.
Menslib is a feminist sub, not a men's rights sub.
[–]pfizerface[S] 78 points79 points80 points 4 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link
In what realm was that aggressive?
I forget men are not allowed to talk to women anymore.
I've seen this type of interaction 10000 times.
The men tried to casually hit on some girls. They play along for a minute without interest. He asks for their number.
At this point she produced the "go away" message on her phone for the first time. Men seem shocked at rejection but literally left 5 seconds after. Cry me a blizzard ❄️
[–]rainbow_bro_bot 55 points56 points57 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Feminists don't seem to realise the reason we are all here today is because at some point in the past one of our parents said hi to the other.
[–]pfizerface[S] 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Simple as that
[+]EnvironmentalWar4627 -45 points-44 points-43 points 4 years ago* (19 children) | Copy Link
When a woman asks you to leave, standing there and asking if you are 'ruining her day' while laughing is not okay. Don't defend that. And if a woman asks you to leave, you should probably just leave.
The FIRST thing he says in the video is 'you hate it don't you'? He's clearly enjoying how upset this woman is getting. It's messed up.
This isn't groundbreaking. It's basic respect.
[–]pfizerface[S] 47 points48 points49 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
I'm not defending anything it was a lame meaningless interaction. I know some men can be pushy and overbearing when drunk, this was hardly it or video worthy.
[+]EnvironmentalWar4627 -39 points-38 points-37 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Anyone that is hovering over a woman and enjoying how upset you are making her deserves to be roasted. And you took the opportunity to criticize the woman in the video.
And now people are reading that and associating it with mens rights. That'd not good. So be better than that.
[–]pfizerface[S] 45 points46 points47 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
The women producing a go away message on her phone was uncalled for. I've seen women dismiss men like they're scum. I will stand by what I said.
Now if you kindly, I won't take lectures from someone with your mentality/comments, whilst I've had girls guilt trip me into pity sex countless times. Not that I care, if it made them feel better.
[+]Winxin -20 points-19 points-18 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I agree with you, the video is not that bad on its own. That said, you aren't any better.
You're playing WOW after 20 years lmao pathetic 🤣🤣🤣
And people wonder why r/mensrights is used as an insult.
[–]pfizerface[S] 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
Aww baby still playing wow in mamas basement
[–]Winxin -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It just goes to show it validated their points, is all. Instead of having a discussion, you immediately went for personal attacks.
Edit: letter.
[+]EnvironmentalWar4627 -19 points-18 points-17 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Oh. I didn't know girls have guilty you into pity sex. That changes everything. I guess make women uncomfortable on purpose to get revenge if that makes you feel better. But don't be surprised if you end up online being called names.
[–]Panderjit_SinghVV 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Women are a hyper-privileged group and should be mocked whenever they assert their privilege.
Counter mocking is punching down; feminist SOP.
[–]Panderjit_SinghVV 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
It’s perfectly okay to laugh at people and to refuse their commands.
We are free people not slaves.
[–]xa3D 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
you're on a very slippery slope with that kinda logic.
[–]EnvironmentalWar4627 -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
If someone was hovering over you while having a meal with your family, and you asked them to leave...you think its perfectly okay for them to laugh and talk about how upset you are?
Are you for real?
[–]chance080 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If I’m in public, I can’t say shit, and don’t expect them to comply 🤷🏻♂️ I’ll ask nicely, not like a douche. Manners tend to go both ways pal.
[–]omidoggo 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Thats way different. Also notice how you are gendering everything in your comments? "If a WOMAN asks you to leave you should leave" its like youre pointlessly gendering it
[–]EnvironmentalWar4627 -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I'm describing the video. The people in the video had genders.
[–]omidoggo 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Nope u weren't. Nice try tho
Maybe, but you don't know what they are.
[–]saucyoreo -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Holy shit this sub is literally fucking insane
When a woman asks you to leave, standing there and asking if you are 'ruining her day' while laughing is not okay.
If you're in a train station or public space, she has no right to ask anyone to leave.
[–]Drippinice 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Why does it have a bad reputation? Because most of the population is completely brainwashed by the media and doesn’t even know what men’s rights stands for. They’re completely ignorant about the subject and just hate it because they’re told to
Odd...
When women are refusing to respect men (and even sexually assaulting them), attacking the men instead of the women is going to get you upvoted.
[–]ISEVERNAMEALREDYTAKE 17 points18 points19 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
this dumbass has the mentality of the average twitter user
[–]DavidByron2 93 points94 points95 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The idea of rights for former slaves were probably the same to the KKK.
[–]Jesus_marley 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Not an insult so much as a thought terminating cliche. They point to something about their opponent they disagree with, and use that as a convenient excuse to dismiss rational arguments.
[–]Richardsnotmyname 61 points62 points63 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
Because feminism is rewarded with the moral high ground automatically despite any actions because of what it stands for, while fighting for men's right is seen as an alt right anti-women incel thing to do. Of course even though the two movements have the same goals, being gender equality.
[–]MathematicianNo4277 34 points35 points36 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Stated goals.
You'll find plenty of feminists and MRA with no love for equality.
[–]Richardsnotmyname 23 points24 points25 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You're absolutely right, which is why no movement should be judged solely by their stated goals, but by their actions.
[–]TAPriceCTR 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Far more feminists. And almost no INFLUENTIAL MRAs.
[–]tenchineuro -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
And almost no INFLUENTIAL MRAs.
There are influential MRAs?
[–]TAPriceCTR 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link
warren farrell, erin pizzey, marc angelucci (rest in peace). honey badger bregade. and almost as bad as the average feminist, you got tarence popp and stephen moleneaux
[–]tenchineuro -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
So tell me about their influence.
What have they accomplished?
[–]TAPriceCTR 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
you're an idiot.
Erin Pizzey invented the domestic violence shelter.
Warren Farrell has written multiple best sellers.
Marc Angelucci is why subjecting women to selective service like men is currently being dealt with in legislation.
what have you accomplished? further more, the point of "influential MRAs" is not about what they have accomplished, but that MRAs listen to them. I don't hate feminism because some rando who claims to be a feminist is nuts... I hate feminism because the influential feminists who are CITED are nuts. it's not that someone who claims to be a feminist started the androcidal hashtag, but that it proliferated. it's not that valerie solanas tried killing andy warhol, but that even AFTER THAT her SCUM manifesto is still feminist literature.
[–]tenchineuro -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
She created the first woman's shelter, she's not an MRA. But when she said that both men and women were violent, she was thrown out of the shelter she created, her dog was killed, the police had to inspect her mail and eventually she fled the country fearing for her life.
What happened there is still not clear, but this was not a victory for men. Men's status is unaffected by women having to register for the draft. It may be a win for equal treatment under the law, but it was of no benefit to men whatsoever.
what have you accomplished?
That's my point, after all these years almost nobody has accomplished anything.
further more, the point of "influential MRAs" is not about what they have accomplished,
If they accomplish nothing, what influence do you claim they have?
I hate feminism because the influential feminists
Now feminism has accomplished a lot, virtually all of it to the detriment of men.
it's not that someone who claims to be a feminist
That's all it takes to be a feminist you know. Or are you implying that it was started by someone not a feminist?
but that it proliferated. it's not that valerie solanas tried killing andy warhol, but that even AFTER THAT her SCUM manifesto is still feminist literature.
And despite all the standards of conduct of the these social media sites, anti-male groups and hashtags are allowed to exist and proliferate. And the MRM can do nothing about it. Influence?
[–]jacksleepshere 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Feminism doesn’t have that goal though. Feminists are actively opposed to equality.
[–]TAPriceCTR 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Not an insult. An ad hominem.. there is a difference even if they're too stupid to think that thoroughly.
[–]narwaffles 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's been like that. r/mensrights is an "incel sub" according to most of reddit.
[–]OctaviaPinfold 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It always has been an insult in the minds of people who think men, as in all men everywhere in any time, used to be the only group having rights therefor we don't deserve any rights.
[–]matejcraft100yt 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
they don't know any other way of countering someone's arguments besides ad hominem attacks. If they resort to ad hominem attack it just means they don't have any arguments but are still refusing to accept they were wrong
if anyone resorts to ad hominem attack, you can just go szraight ahead and consider him the loser of that convo
[–]silly_little_jingle 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Maybe when a video of a woman acting like an entitled bitch we should write “feminism lol”. We won’t though because just like this video the two don’t have a fucking thing yo do with each other.
[–]VillainRetro 19 points20 points21 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
So men having rights is a bad thing!? What a sad world we live in.
[–]TheClinicallyInsane 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Honestly I saw that vid and there was no freak out, but those dudes shoulda just got the hell outta there. If they had been talking nice up til that point she's a bitch for acting like that and if they had just shown up and started chatting her up then they should've bailed and avoided a scene.
Nothing is worse for your reputation then a girl who causes a scene. No one wants a guy who causes a scene, I hope, so why a woman?
[–]chance080 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I mean, you could catch the scene before it starts and stop it, but then you’d definitely be in a lot more trouble.
That being said, I’ve had a woman cause a scene and actually put hands on me in a Target before, (she started swinging cause I didn’t want to grab something off the top shelf for her). I didn’t punch back, just grabbed wrists and put her ass in the milk refrigerator and shut the door and yelled for someone to get a manager.
Manager came, freaked out at first, but when I told him to have his coworkers review the video footage, he quickly realized I’d done my absolute best to not injure her, and I joked that she just needed to cool down.
Paid for the milk & some other packages that got damaged in there, but it was so satisfying watching her try to explain to the cops why she felt that assaulting me was okay.
They asked me if I wanted to press charges to which I turned to her and asked “are you ever gonna put your hands on another man ever again?” She started bawling when she realized she was the one in trouble and not me, and apologized a ton (not that I believed any of it was sincere).
But she said she wouldn’t, and I told her to check her bias and her privilege to which she just went silent. I then explained to her that the next guy might not be as nice as I was to try not to injure her, and that those situations don’t usually end up well for the woman. To which the cops and manager present agreed verbally to.
Still one of the prouder moments of my life. I do wonder if that woman ever put hands on another person after that though.
[–]tenchineuro 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Cool.
I've had a few outrageous experiences with woman I don't know lately, and I will probably mention them in comments when appropriate. I wish my wife had been there cause she'd have read them the riot act. Me, I kept a low profile and said as little as possible.
I think shit like this happens to most men, they just try to ignore it and get on with life,
[–]Dahata13666 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Finally someone filling in the blanks.
[–]ChaosOpen 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I love how girls on one hand will intentionally play "hard to get" to make him "work for it" then wonder why on the rare occasions when they actually mean "no," guys assume they don't mean it.
[–]Good_Stuff11 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It’s been an insult for a long time now my guy
[–]anonymouslionn 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Not a patriarchy.
[–]Dr_Frasier_Bane 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Ignore them. Attention is their food and drug of choice.
[–]dungeonmonkey69 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
🙌🔥
[–]coolboy_24278 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
fuck that subreddit of r/publicfreakout! has some of the most woke and hypocritical leftists on Reddit!!
[–]Slap-A-Chav 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Just practice not giving a fuck. You don't have to be amazing at it right away. Just give 1% less fucks tomorrow and do that for a couple of days, then after that take it up a notch and give 2% less fucks...and so on - until you have no fucks left to give.
[–]the_denizen 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
People who go digging in someone's comment history because they got nothing real to say are cringe as fuck. It's literally the "anime profile pic" of reddit. Users on this site fucking suck.
[–]Iceman_Hottie 24 points25 points26 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
It's because not approving of a left-wing (feminism being one) cult often got people killed, and it seems to an ingrained feature, making any mention of a decenting opinion synonymous to at least an insult although more typically a mark for abuse or execution.
Examples: the "reign of terror", Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Castro.
[+]MathematicianNo4277 -8 points-7 points-6 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
And radical right wing ideologies to the contrary are super peaceful
[–]motoko_urashima 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What exactly is a radical right wing ideology? Islam? The left love Islam!
[–]Iceman_Hottie 19 points20 points21 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No, and never claimed it to be. It is human nature vs human nature + additional pressure.
The point is that the philosophy that was and is foundational to the left-wing ideology is exacerbates the issue. Another difference between the two is that the right has a fairly static virtue system, which at least to some extent acts as a counterbalance to bloodthirsty tendencies. The the left-wing was founded on opposing having right-wing values, therefore having no such counterbalance and allows completely unhinged individuals to rise up to power much easier.
[–]UsualZealousideal785 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
shut the fuck up, nobody mentioned right wing assmunch
[–]chance080 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Right wing or left wing, we are all men, and we all face common issues.
[–]Iceman_Hottie 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
True. My point was that left-wing philosophy is not a good basis for anything. Right-wing philosophy also has its drawbacks, but it was used to create our civilization, therefore has done something right.
Learn from those who created civilization, as they know how to create, not from those who destroyed it, as they know only how to destroy.
If it is of interest, I have a few ideas of how to approach left-wing goals (such as socialised health care) without relying on left-wing logic. Let me know if you want me to write it out.
[–]chance080 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Go for it homie, I’m always down for a good discussion on the topic of politics, I consider myself middle ground in most cases.
[–]Iceman_Hottie 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Thanks my dude, and likewise. I try to look at politics in terms of what's creating a flourishing society, practically doable an could withstand both adversity and the test of time.
The capitalist argument for a socialised healtcare system and an overall robust social safety net (like Denmark) is stress reduction and cost of opportunity mitigation.
Having a robust social safety net artificially creates a system where if something goes terribly wrong there is something in place to help, thus you don't need to be worried as much about it. This is important in a more technologically and economically advanced world, as the previous way of doing the same via a large extended family is not feasible due issues keeping birthrate even at replacement.
Stress is linked to lower: health, job performance and life satisfaction. All of these affect productivity, thus having a social safety net to some extent boosts productivity.
Another benefit is the reduction of the cost of opportunity. This comes into play starting a business, as if something happens you will have a way to survive without it costing you "an arm and a leg". This is also beneficial to companies of any scale as it allows workers stand up to bad higher ups, without existential fear. The benefit to companies is that it highlights bad leaders/a lack of leadership skills, which cuts into profit and unnecessarily increases stress, again cutting into profit.
Why a socialist approach does not work is economic sustainability and cost of first adoption of a technology. To be maintained long-term the amount of wealth spent on the social safety net must be backed up by the amount of wealth created via primarily labour, and excessive taxation reduces the insentives to be productive (what's the point) and the opportunities for investment and creation of new businesses by both new entrepreneurs and successful businesses moguls. When a new technology comes along at its initial stages it is very costly and unreliable, when compared to itself after having the time and opportunity to mature, thus it makes sense to have such technologies be a premium option until such a time that it becomes feasible to implement it in the socialised system.
Fundamentally, the expansion of such a system would be significantly contingent on technological advances, with technology being an effort multiplier in the production of wealth.
This would allow people to increase their wealth through merit, while still providing a base level of help to those in need. Not necessarily a utopian base level as socialists want, but should sustainable and relies on right-wing values.
How does this sound?
[–]MathematicianNo4277 -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Lovely
[–]pn1159 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Yeah, I was having a discussion with someone and they looked at my post history. They said the same thing, lol men's rights. I told him what I tell everyone, all people are entitled to the same rights.
I told him what I tell everyone, all people are entitled to the same rights.
Such blasphemy will get you banned most places.
[–]supermagnumpowercop 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
MEN'S RIGHTS? DEMANDING EQUALITY?? WTF!
[–]Lmaoreddit26 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
were you saying “where is the freakout” because you can’t see the video op? I think reddit mobile didn’t display it for you
either way being here shouldn’t be insulted
[–]pfizerface[S] 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
freak-out nounINFORMAL noun: freakout a wildly irrational reaction or spell of behaviour.
[–]geocitiesuser 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You don't even know how much drama you get into for posting here.
We get targetted and harassed on the big subreddits, and they post our info on circle jerk subs. The mods and the admins are okay with this.
[–]Z0mbleBee 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
So it's finally happened...
Guess that's good in a way as it means we're big now. Just gotta pray we don't get banned.
[–]Complete_Anything681 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Of course it is. Men don't deserve "rights" and anyone who says so is a white supremacist, even if he's black !
[–]newyorkloser45 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Most redditors love to stalk and attack your post history when they have no legitimate defense lmao
[–]venom9110 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Fam hide your community membership in settings.
[–]justsomeregret 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's honestly no different then using feminism as an insult if you do either you're a hypocrite both are shitty both are good
[+][deleted] 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]pfizerface[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Strange that, my 4 month old account has more karma than yours of 4 years with 50x more threads.
The only thing cringe and uninteresting be you 👋
[+][deleted] 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]pfizerface[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
No but neither do I. Yet it contradicts your prior statement completely.
[+][deleted] 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]pfizerface[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
And that's your own shitty opinion because the karma says otherwise. I bet you take your online presence on a Reddit forum real seriously.
[+]EnvironmentalWar4627 -75 points-74 points-73 points 4 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link
I don't think mens rights users defending men being assholes in public freakout videos is a very good look.
Only going to continue to make people think the sub is a hot bed of misogyny when we all know that isn't true.
[–]LoveHotelCondom 49 points50 points51 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
defending men being assholes in public
The comment wasn't about defending them. It was asking why it was appropriate for PublicFreakout. I don't know what OP's reasoning for posting that comment was as I haven't seen the video, but it's a real stretch to say he was agreeing with the guys in the video.
[–]someone_butnoone 34 points35 points36 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
U gotta ignore him mate. He's a parasite to this sub and a very well known troll. Its like he trolls for a living
[–]pfizerface[S] 37 points38 points39 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
You have -100 karma
[–]tenchineuro 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
He always has -100 karma, despite the fact that a post just above this has -75 karma and I commented in another post about one post that had -50 karma.
Whomever and whatever this poster is, he is not bound by the rules and his karma count is a lie.
[–]Clemicus 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Can't go below minus 100 karma. I've seen it a few times
That's probably correct, but I've been unable to find any reddit source to verify.
[–]Clemicus 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
You're right. Something funky is going on with their karma. Last time I saw it, it was -100. Now it's 39
[–]tenchineuro 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
It's -100 again now.
At the very least it should prevent them from posting here continuously, there's a timer before you can post again.
Weird. It's still displaying 39 for me. Might be a cache issue
Could be, but the poster I responded to also saw -100 karma.
[+]EnvironmentalWar4627 -49 points-48 points-47 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It's like golf right? Lowest score wins?
[–]sleepyJoeBidet 38 points39 points40 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
At least we know you aren't contributing to echo chambers.
[+]evilchefwariobatali -51 points-50 points-49 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
this comment being downvoted is truly *chefs kiss
[–]rockcliffdesigns 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
So those NPCs were upvoting a text post in the name of freakout?
[–]craigske 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Only if you react like it is
[–]TheSilverShade 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Might be time for you guys to use an alt account.
And for mods to look for an alternative platform while there's still time. Trust me.
[–]Ill_Fisherman8352 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Let's not limit ourselves to tags like they do. We are more than just words. We are men's liberty, we are gender equality, we are many things.
[–]xsplizzle 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Nothing new, constantly get insulted (and downvote bombed) elsewhere on reddit for posting on here
[–]ostrieto17 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I really don't understand what they mean with that comment it's just a salad of words
[–]truth-informant 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Classic Bulverism.
Where is the freakout tho? whu?
[–]Big_Shot12 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I bet this person with the reply is a guy
[–]nacho-chonky 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yup feminists hate men soo much that standing up for our right to an education or to have custody of our children is seen as terrible
[–]P1tzO1 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
can i put my balls in yo jaws
[–]TAPriceCTR 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yes, the rights men have are a joke. But men's rights refers to those trying to fix those issues.
[+]Skyrmir -14 points-13 points-12 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Probably because this sub jumped the shark years ago. The majority of what gets rabble roused in here is butt hurt feelings about fringe cases. And continuous whining. This sub could be used as a demonstration of what's wrong with social media algorithms, and the damage they cause.
[–]Panderjit_SinghVV 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Systemic and widespread sex discrimination are not fringe cases.
[+]Skyrmir -6 points-5 points-4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No but the ones cried about here are.
[+]IDonnu4Real -33 points-32 points-31 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
No, they used your participation in this sub as an insult, not the movement itself
[–]fanfan64 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
brain bug?
[–]IDonnu4Real -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Posted this above as well, but here you go:
It’s pretty clear, but you guys refuse to accept it, and seek outrage.
I’m assuming the other user is a woman, so I’ll be saying she henceforth.
She had an expectation from OO, that he would be active in incel subs. That’s why she said “lmao mensrights” and not “lmao mens rights”. See the difference? The latter means “Yeah you’re an idiot, because I can see your activity in the men’s rights movement.” While the former says “I can see you’re an idiot, because of your activity in the mensrights subreddit.”
There’s a clear difference. This sub isn’t the movement itself, nor the reverse. One can support the movement, but still think this sub is becoming a bit of an echo chamber, and a gathering for women hating incels, like I think. It’s no longer focusing on issues men face, but just on feminists being stupid. It’s full of whataboutism. That’s why the rest of reddit despises the sub, and that’s why she dismissed OP, after seeing how active he was in this sub.
So no, “Men’s Rights” is not an insult. “Mensrights”, or for the user with more time, “r/mensrights member” is an insult for many people. Or not an insult really, just a dismissal I suppose.
Don’t believe I’m right? The moment I started questioning the narrative in this sub, I got downvoted to oblivion. It’s clearly not much of an open minded sub reddit anymore… shame
[–]Good_Stuff11 23 points24 points25 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
How does your brain function like this to write this sentence.
[+]IDonnu4Real -19 points-18 points-17 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Wdym?
[–]IDonnu4Real -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–][deleted] 169 points170 points171 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Embarrassed-Call-925 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Nihi1986 97 points98 points99 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]motoko_urashima 9 points10 points11 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]Yithar 22 points23 points24 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Ill_Fisherman8352 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Nihi1986 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]blazedagamer 6 points7 points8 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]chance080 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]scyth3s[🍰] 3 points4 points5 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]matrixislife 5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]tenchineuro 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]0utsid3r1620 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]omidoggo 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MDFMK 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PhillipZimbargo 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TraehNoil 22 points23 points24 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]pfizerface[S] 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]chance080 3 points4 points5 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]TraehNoil 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]chance080 5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TraehNoil 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]pfizerface[S] 148 points149 points150 points (43 children) | Copy Link
[–]xm791 123 points124 points125 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]geocitiesuser 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]EnvironmentalWar4627 -78 points-77 points-76 points (40 children) | Copy Link
[–]xm791 50 points51 points52 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[+]EnvironmentalWar4627 -40 points-39 points-38 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]xm791 52 points53 points54 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[+]EnvironmentalWar4627 -27 points-26 points-25 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]Marcuspie 12 points13 points14 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[+]EnvironmentalWar4627 -10 points-9 points-8 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Marcuspie 10 points11 points12 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]chance080 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]EnvironmentalWar4627 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tenchineuro 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Panderjit_SinghVV 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tenchineuro 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]sakura_drop 15 points16 points17 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]reddut_gang 10 points11 points12 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tenchineuro 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]pfizerface[S] 78 points79 points80 points (22 children) | Copy Link
[–]rainbow_bro_bot 55 points56 points57 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]pfizerface[S] 16 points17 points18 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]EnvironmentalWar4627 -45 points-44 points-43 points (19 children) | Copy Link
[–]pfizerface[S] 47 points48 points49 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[+]EnvironmentalWar4627 -39 points-38 points-37 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]pfizerface[S] 45 points46 points47 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[+]Winxin -20 points-19 points-18 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]pfizerface[S] 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Winxin -4 points-3 points-2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[+]EnvironmentalWar4627 -19 points-18 points-17 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Panderjit_SinghVV 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Panderjit_SinghVV 3 points4 points5 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]xa3D 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]EnvironmentalWar4627 -2 points-1 points0 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]chance080 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]omidoggo 5 points6 points7 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]EnvironmentalWar4627 -3 points-2 points-1 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]omidoggo 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tenchineuro 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]saucyoreo -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tenchineuro 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Drippinice 11 points12 points13 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tenchineuro 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ISEVERNAMEALREDYTAKE 17 points18 points19 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DavidByron2 93 points94 points95 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Jesus_marley 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Richardsnotmyname 61 points62 points63 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]MathematicianNo4277 34 points35 points36 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Richardsnotmyname 23 points24 points25 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TAPriceCTR 11 points12 points13 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]tenchineuro -2 points-1 points0 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]TAPriceCTR 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]tenchineuro -2 points-1 points0 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]TAPriceCTR 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]tenchineuro -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jacksleepshere 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TAPriceCTR 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]narwaffles 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]OctaviaPinfold 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]matejcraft100yt 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]silly_little_jingle 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]VillainRetro 19 points20 points21 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheClinicallyInsane 5 points6 points7 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]chance080 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]tenchineuro 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Dahata13666 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ChaosOpen 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Good_Stuff11 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]anonymouslionn 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Dr_Frasier_Bane 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]dungeonmonkey69 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]coolboy_24278 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Slap-A-Chav 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]the_denizen 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Iceman_Hottie 24 points25 points26 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[+]MathematicianNo4277 -8 points-7 points-6 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]motoko_urashima 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Iceman_Hottie 19 points20 points21 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]UsualZealousideal785 6 points7 points8 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]chance080 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Iceman_Hottie 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]chance080 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Iceman_Hottie 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MathematicianNo4277 -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]pn1159 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]tenchineuro 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]supermagnumpowercop 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lmaoreddit26 12 points13 points14 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]pfizerface[S] 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]geocitiesuser 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Z0mbleBee 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Complete_Anything681 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]newyorkloser45 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]venom9110 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]justsomeregret 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (6 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]pfizerface[S] 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (4 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]pfizerface[S] 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]pfizerface[S] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[+]EnvironmentalWar4627 -75 points-74 points-73 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]LoveHotelCondom 49 points50 points51 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]someone_butnoone 34 points35 points36 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]pfizerface[S] 37 points38 points39 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]tenchineuro 1 point2 points3 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Clemicus 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]tenchineuro 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Clemicus 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]tenchineuro 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Clemicus 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]tenchineuro 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]EnvironmentalWar4627 -49 points-48 points-47 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]sleepyJoeBidet 38 points39 points40 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]evilchefwariobatali -51 points-50 points-49 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]rockcliffdesigns 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]craigske 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheSilverShade 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ill_Fisherman8352 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]xsplizzle 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ostrieto17 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]truth-informant 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Dahata13666 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Big_Shot12 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]nacho-chonky 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]P1tzO1 14 points15 points16 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TAPriceCTR 10 points11 points12 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Skyrmir -14 points-13 points-12 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Panderjit_SinghVV 10 points11 points12 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[+]Skyrmir -6 points-5 points-4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]IDonnu4Real -33 points-32 points-31 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]fanfan64 9 points10 points11 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]IDonnu4Real -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Good_Stuff11 23 points24 points25 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]IDonnu4Real -19 points-18 points-17 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]IDonnu4Real -4 points-3 points-2 points (0 children) | Copy Link