No seriously it’s for nerds think about it, while these men with minimal dating experience discuss the “nature of women” other guys go and meet women. Should a guy get laid he becomes a chad.

Argument 1 Red pill doesn’t account for attachment styles

1 how can red pill claim to understand women when it doesn’t account for basic attachment styles?

Argument 2 chad is the embodiment of nerd insecurities.

1 “women only want assholes”

2 “the nice guy is gonna be beta bucks”

3 “women only date the top 20 percent”

Argument 3 these nerds don’t take rejection well so they blame the “nature of women” rather than work on themselves.

Argument 4

Our environment molds us how can red pill know so much about women who’s background they have no idea about? Does she come from a broken home? Did her father beat her mother? Was she loved as a child? The only way to find any of this out is to talk to the individual women.

Argument 5

Dating isn’t a video game having the right look (stats) isn’t going guarantee great sex and meaningful relationships it only gets your foot in the door.

Closing statement

The red pill gets one thing right it teaches men to work on themselves, but it begins to hinder them when certain elements of the red make men bitter and resentful.

Edit : changed dating styles do attachment styles to make my point more clear.