TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

aghayden Archive

View 231 posts and 909 comments by aghayden on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1893

FundamentalsAghayden/r/seduction29/09/20 11:27 PM
1375

Aghayden/r/seduction11/02/20 06:01 AM
1049

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill04/08/18 12:49 PM
925

Inner Game Aghayden/r/seduction07/08/20 07:14 AM
875

FundamentalsAghayden/r/seduction16/05/20 06:16 PM
751

Aghayden/r/seduction04/12/19 05:54 AM
727

Aghayden/r/seduction10/01/19 05:45 PM
724

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill18/09/20 02:47 AM
669

FundamentalsAghayden/r/seduction11/02/21 12:29 AM
664

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill17/04/19 03:30 AM
643

FundamentalsAghayden/r/seduction02/05/21 11:53 PM
629

Aghayden/r/seduction13/08/18 01:49 AM
622

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill12/12/18 05:24 PM
612

Outer Game Aghayden/r/seduction19/11/20 12:39 AM
606

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill21/09/18 03:40 AM
523

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill31/08/20 03:20 AM
509

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill21/10/18 07:12 AM
498

Aghayden/r/seduction31/10/18 04:50 PM
495

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill28/08/20 03:31 AM
476

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill27/11/18 06:56 AM
471

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill11/11/18 04:40 AM
426

Aghayden/r/seduction06/12/18 06:42 PM
417

Inner Game Aghayden/r/seduction12/03/21 03:04 AM
383

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill28/06/17 02:36 AM
326

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill17/12/18 08:40 PM
324

Aghayden/r/seduction20/01/20 07:48 AM
315

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill06/12/18 11:25 AM
305

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill12/01/19 02:43 AM
299

Aghayden/r/TheRedPill18/04/17 01:33 AM
288

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill13/05/17 01:16 AM
270

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill31/10/18 04:30 PM
267

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill20/08/18 03:30 AM
254

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill04/01/19 04:41 PM
250

Aghayden/r/TheRedPill15/06/17 03:46 PM
244

Aghayden/r/TheRedPill11/08/18 11:42 PM
231

Aghayden/r/TheRedPill08/12/17 06:10 PM
230

Aghayden/r/TheRedPill10/05/17 10:13 PM
229

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill28/09/17 07:27 PM
225

Inner Game Aghayden/r/seduction04/08/21 05:22 AM
222

Aghayden/r/seduction25/10/18 02:37 AM
217

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill14/07/19 09:26 PM
216

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill10/02/18 05:29 AM
210

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill16/10/17 02:01 AM
203

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill20/06/19 10:16 PM
188

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill19/05/17 05:28 AM
174

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill07/09/18 05:43 AM
171

Aghayden/r/TheRedPill02/10/17 01:52 AM
162

Aghayden/r/seduction16/12/18 09:17 PM
160

FundamentalsAghayden/r/seduction27/09/20 01:40 AM
159

Aghayden/r/seduction18/03/17 01:14 AM
156

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill20/08/21 03:40 AM
156

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill07/02/18 09:14 AM
151

Aghayden/r/seduction20/02/20 01:51 AM
149

Aghayden/r/TheRedPill22/04/17 07:54 AM
147

Aghayden/r/seduction01/02/18 04:41 AM
143

Field ReportAghayden/r/TheRedPill11/09/17 12:04 AM
133

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill17/06/17 01:46 AM
131

Aghayden/r/seduction15/08/18 10:27 PM
123

Aghayden/r/seduction18/01/19 02:56 AM
122

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill11/05/19 01:15 AM
118

Aghayden/r/seduction26/08/19 12:12 AM
116

Aghayden/r/TheRedPill20/07/17 12:43 AM
96

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill10/06/17 08:46 PM
94

Aghayden/r/TheRedPill20/04/17 05:00 AM
91

FundamentalsAghayden/r/seduction26/08/20 03:27 AM
91

Aghayden/r/seduction31/07/19 01:09 AM
88

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill06/07/17 06:06 PM
81

Inner Game Aghayden/r/seduction06/05/20 07:54 PM
76

Aghayden/r/seduction14/03/17 10:00 PM
75

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill12/03/19 06:45 AM
62

ResourcesAghayden/r/seduction29/06/21 09:14 AM
57

Aghayden/r/TheRedPill18/03/17 01:15 AM
54

Aghayden/r/TheRedPill08/04/17 01:04 AM
49

Aghayden/r/TheRedPill07/05/17 09:05 PM
46

Aghayden/r/TheRedPill13/09/17 06:22 PM
42

Aghayden/r/seduction11/05/17 12:37 AM
41

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill06/01/18 04:50 AM
41

Inner Game Aghayden/r/seduction27/12/21 12:49 AM
38

Aghayden/r/TheRedPill22/04/17 08:04 PM
38

Aghayden/r/TheRedPill21/02/18 06:52 AM
37

Aghayden/r/TheRedPill17/03/17 10:03 PM
37

Aghayden/r/TheRedPill19/03/17 01:36 AM
37

Aghayden/r/seduction25/04/19 11:55 PM
36

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill23/05/17 12:19 AM
35

Aghayden/r/seduction06/02/20 05:49 AM
34

Inner Game Aghayden/r/seduction23/07/21 08:31 PM
34

Inner Game Aghayden/r/seduction27/10/21 04:51 AM
33

FundamentalsAghayden/r/seduction04/07/20 10:14 PM
31

FundamentalsAghayden/r/seduction12/08/21 11:27 PM
30

Aghayden/r/TheRedPill18/04/17 07:06 PM
29

Aghayden/r/seduction06/01/18 04:54 AM
27

Aghayden/r/seduction17/12/17 02:03 AM
27

Aghayden/r/seduction11/10/19 05:39 PM
26

FundamentalsAghayden/r/seduction13/06/20 05:38 AM
25

Aghayden/r/seduction07/12/19 01:35 AM
24

Aghayden/r/seduction26/11/18 06:14 PM
24

Aghayden/r/seduction03/01/19 03:29 AM
23

Aghayden/r/seduction03/09/18 12:57 AM
23

Aghayden/r/TheRedPill19/03/17 12:00 AM
23

Aghayden/r/seduction13/12/18 08:31 PM
23

Aghayden/r/TheRedPill15/08/18 05:30 AM
22

FundamentalsAghayden/r/seduction25/08/20 01:01 AM
21

Aghayden/r/TheRedPill15/03/17 05:51 PM
21

Aghayden/r/seduction22/05/17 11:55 PM
21

Aghayden/r/TheRedPill02/05/17 09:59 PM
20

Aghayden/r/seduction01/09/18 09:29 PM
20

Aghayden/r/TheRedPill18/03/17 09:28 PM
20

Aghayden/r/seduction08/12/17 06:10 PM
20

Aghayden/r/seduction01/10/17 04:33 PM
18

Aghayden/r/seduction08/01/18 11:06 PM
18

FundamentalsAghayden/r/seduction15/04/21 04:10 AM
17

Aghayden/r/seduction27/09/19 11:58 PM
17

Aghayden/r/seduction24/07/19 03:25 AM
17

Aghayden/r/seduction19/05/17 08:47 PM
16

Outer Game Aghayden/r/seduction27/10/20 10:05 PM
16

Aghayden/r/seduction13/01/18 06:34 PM
15

Aghayden/r/seduction22/04/17 02:07 AM
14

Aghayden/r/seduction20/09/19 05:24 PM
14

FundamentalsAghayden/r/seduction24/04/21 11:45 PM
13

Aghayden/r/seduction10/06/17 08:41 PM
13

Field ReportAghayden/r/TheRedPill08/01/18 11:07 PM
13

Aghayden/r/seduction22/04/17 08:05 PM
13

Aghayden/r/seduction22/02/20 02:09 AM
12

Inner Game Aghayden/r/seduction27/07/21 09:20 AM
12

Aghayden/r/seduction26/08/18 04:23 AM
11

Aghayden/r/seduction10/02/19 02:10 AM
11

Aghayden/r/seduction14/03/17 02:36 AM
10

Aghayden/r/seduction25/08/19 03:17 AM
10

Outer Game Aghayden/r/seduction29/09/20 01:14 AM
10

FundamentalsAghayden/r/seduction11/08/21 04:53 AM
8

Aghayden/r/seduction20/08/19 01:44 AM
8

Aghayden/r/seduction13/03/17 03:11 AM
7

Aghayden/r/seduction16/04/17 04:55 AM
7

Aghayden/r/seduction19/03/17 01:37 AM
7

Aghayden/r/seduction20/04/17 03:44 AM
6

Aghayden/r/seduction17/06/19 10:37 PM
6

Aghayden/r/seduction26/09/18 02:40 AM
6

Aghayden/r/seduction08/02/19 12:59 AM
6

Aghayden/r/seduction05/10/19 10:06 AM
6

Inner Game Aghayden/r/seduction22/06/20 02:51 AM
5

Aghayden/r/seduction07/02/18 09:11 AM
5

Inner Game Aghayden/r/seduction25/12/20 08:26 AM
5

Aghayden/r/seduction17/01/20 04:58 PM
5

Aghayden/r/seduction04/01/18 11:58 PM
5

LifestyleAghayden/r/seduction08/09/20 05:06 AM
5

Aghayden/r/seduction17/03/17 10:05 PM
4

Field ReportAghayden/r/seduction17/04/21 10:10 PM
4

Aghayden/r/seduction09/02/20 05:03 AM
4

Aghayden/r/seduction30/06/19 02:02 AM
4

Outer Game Aghayden/r/seduction30/08/20 03:32 AM
4

Outer Game Aghayden/r/seduction23/09/20 03:23 AM
3

Aghayden/r/seduction06/07/17 07:43 PM
3

FundamentalsAghayden/r/seduction16/09/20 03:07 AM
3

Aghayden/r/seduction31/12/19 11:07 PM
3

Inner Game Aghayden/r/seduction03/09/20 03:07 AM
3

Aghayden/r/seduction21/12/17 01:31 AM
3

Aghayden/r/seduction26/02/20 03:23 AM
3

Aghayden/r/seduction07/11/18 06:27 PM
3

Aghayden/r/seduction17/03/17 10:12 PM
3

Aghayden/r/seduction14/07/19 09:30 PM
3

Aghayden/r/seduction01/02/18 04:34 AM
3

Aghayden/r/seduction29/03/19 06:35 AM
3

Aghayden/r/seduction13/01/18 05:37 AM
3

Aghayden/r/seduction19/03/17 01:32 AM
2

Aghayden/r/seduction06/07/17 06:08 PM
2

Outer Game Aghayden/r/seduction01/04/21 07:35 PM
2

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill27/06/19 01:38 AM
2

Aghayden/r/seduction21/12/17 05:20 AM
2

Aghayden/r/seduction16/04/17 04:48 AM
2

FundamentalsAghayden/r/seduction12/09/20 02:45 AM
2

Aghayden/r/seduction28/08/19 11:47 PM
2

Aghayden/r/seduction11/12/17 06:06 PM
2

Aghayden/r/seduction25/10/19 04:03 AM
2

Aghayden/r/seduction17/12/17 02:21 AM
2

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill15/04/20 05:20 PM
2

Aghayden/r/seduction14/06/19 02:37 PM
2

Aghayden/r/seduction29/09/17 05:31 PM
2

Building PowerAghayden/r/TheRedPill27/06/18 06:33 PM
2

ResourcesAghayden/r/seduction20/06/20 01:50 AM
2

Aghayden/r/seduction23/08/19 11:57 PM
2

Aghayden/r/seduction26/06/19 04:50 AM
2

Aghayden/r/seduction18/03/17 11:59 PM
2

Aghayden/r/seduction05/07/19 03:32 PM
1

Aghayden/r/seduction15/06/17 06:29 PM
1

Aghayden/r/seduction06/02/18 05:41 AM
1

Aghayden/r/TheRedPill17/06/17 01:46 AM
1

Aghayden/r/seduction14/05/19 12:42 AM
1

Outer Game Aghayden/r/seduction20/09/20 10:38 PM
1

Aghayden/r/seduction09/07/19 02:40 PM
1

Inner Game Aghayden/r/seduction10/08/20 11:37 PM
1

Aghayden/r/seduction28/09/17 07:34 PM
1

Aghayden/r/seduction24/01/17 04:22 PM
1

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill05/10/19 10:08 AM
1

Aghayden/r/seduction17/04/17 05:37 PM
1

Aghayden/r/seduction07/06/17 11:38 PM
1

Aghayden/r/seduction15/11/18 02:49 AM
1

Aghayden/r/TheRedPill16/04/17 04:54 AM
1

Aghayden/r/seduction04/06/17 12:55 AM
1

Aghayden/r/seduction03/02/17 06:30 AM
1

Aghayden/r/seduction24/02/18 06:38 PM
1

Aghayden/r/seduction06/06/18 11:09 PM
1

Aghayden/r/seduction26/06/19 06:27 PM
1

Aghayden/r/seduction09/12/19 11:06 PM
1

Aghayden/r/seduction21/01/17 03:37 PM
1

Aghayden/r/seduction24/12/19 12:27 AM
1

Inner Game Aghayden/r/seduction01/09/20 03:00 AM
1

FundamentalsAghayden/r/seduction25/03/20 08:00 AM
1

Aghayden/r/seduction22/01/17 02:03 AM
1

Aghayden/r/seduction18/03/17 09:27 PM
1

Aghayden/r/seduction26/09/19 04:07 AM
1

FundamentalsAghayden/r/seduction28/04/21 11:13 PM
1

Aghayden/r/seduction25/02/17 12:13 AM
0

FundamentalsAghayden/r/seduction20/04/21 03:09 AM
0

Aghayden/r/seduction06/03/17 07:14 AM
0

Aghayden/r/seduction04/04/17 09:44 PM
0

Outer Game Aghayden/r/seduction25/09/20 04:25 AM
0

Red Pill TheoryAghayden/r/TheRedPill23/02/19 04:52 PM
0

Aghayden/r/seduction20/03/17 08:41 PM
0

Aghayden/r/seduction30/05/19 04:27 AM
0

Removed: Unhelpful Body TextAghayden/r/seduction18/02/21 06:21 PM
0

Aghayden/r/TheRedPill17/04/17 05:28 PM
0

Aghayden/r/seduction03/02/17 11:38 PM
0

Aghayden/r/seduction07/01/17 06:11 AM
0

Aghayden/r/seduction31/10/19 12:03 AM
0

FundamentalsAghayden/r/seduction07/05/21 10:58 PM
0

FundamentalsAghayden/r/seduction07/12/20 08:44 AM
0

Aghayden/r/seduction09/06/17 10:02 PM
0

Aghayden/r/seduction03/12/18 03:08 AM
0

Outer Game Aghayden/r/seduction16/08/21 03:59 AM
0

Aghayden/r/seduction14/03/17 04:20 AM
0

Aghayden/r/seduction10/06/17 06:30 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

It's entirely possible but I don't remember off the top of my head
/r/seduction27/12/21 05:36 AM
2

Yeah, telling her you might give it to her is going to make her think about getting it which is not a turn on for most women (I hope lol). You could argue it was the rational thing to do, but ultimately, it's a topic that you gotta be careful with bringing up if you want there to be a sexual mood.
/r/seduction27/12/21 05:12 AM
10

There's a million ways you can do that. One is texting her too much, wanting to hang out more often than she does, acting like she's above you and you have to earn her affection, sexually putting too much effort into giving her pleasure without having any primal lust direct your actions (ex: saying, "do you like that?" every five minutes), investing in the relationship too quickly (ex: trying to subtly move in with her or staying over without being invited or trying to make it official too soon)…
/r/seduction27/12/21 05:04 AM
5

I think men do it more than they admit as well. Women tend to think of themselves as more emotional than men so when they're irrational they can really double down on it. But they also know they're being irrational on some level. However, men think they're logical and are better at suppressing their emotions, but that doesn't mean we aren't making our decisions based on some feeling that we aren't aware of. I've met so many guys that say they just want a hot girl, but they end up dating a very a…
/r/seduction27/12/21 05:00 AM
17

She might just not take covid very seriously and see that as unattractive. It's a very polarized subject so some girls would get upset if you got the sniffles and didn't put on a mask, others would do the opposite. Now, if you acted concerned about getting sick yourself, I think that's unattractive to women on a different level—especially since in your 30s it's not likely to be severe. It basically can come across as lacking courage.
/r/seduction27/12/21 04:54 AM
1

I agree that experience is crucial for learning. But I also think being aware of the common mistakes and roadblocks you're likely to run into helps you adjust course and learn more efficiently rather than getting stuck.
/r/seduction27/12/21 04:51 AM
2

I know a guy with a 400+ laycount who often gets in toxic relationships with the worst girls. And like I said in the post, some of the most successful pickup coaches had the same experience. You do have to learn to control your emotions, but only in certain contexts - when a relationship starts to form it's easy to let that fall out the window. Beyond that, most guys don't get good at game before they settle down with a girl in the first place. They get halfway decent, then get excited when some…
/r/seduction27/12/21 04:37 AM
2

That's smoking for me. Spitting too.
/r/seduction27/12/21 04:32 AM
1

Most people won't learn it even when they do experience it, there's a lack of awareness about these things. Men tend to have very romanticized notions about sex and relationships that cause them to make horrible decisions. I'd say avoiding getting into toxic relationships is one of the hardest things to teach in pickup, because men get so invested so quickly. But, I'm gonna try, I've seen guys ruin their lives simply because they got tied down to the wrong girl. And no problem man.
/r/seduction27/12/21 04:30 AM
7

Would you consider yourself charismatic? Would you say your 'game' is on point? Do you know how to look at a girl with a feeling of raw, unrestrained desire to be with her? Did you act in a way that might be perceived as needy? Or, are you average and no one really notices you? If it's the latter, don't assume you're too ugly
/r/seduction27/12/21 04:25 AM
13

Ther was one study in which a bunch of people wrote down the traits they want in a potential partner. Then they did some speed dating and chose which people they wanted to see again. The people they chose often had the exact opposite traits that they wrote down. That's just one example, if you want more about how we are unaware of our own desires read, "Strangers To Ourselves," by Timothy Wilson The basic point is that what we think we want and what we actually respond to are often at odds. For …
/r/seduction27/12/21 04:24 AM
3

Everyone knows this. Yet many people end up in those situations anyway. The point is to understand that despite how obvious it is to wear condoms and not get with a toxic girl, it's very easy to make those mistakes and it's important to know exactly why men do it against their better judgment. That can't be explained in one sentence.
/r/seduction27/12/21 04:19 AM
3

Technically accurate, but that's about as useful as telling someone, "If you want to lose weight. Eat at a caloric deficit." It's the context that matters (the how and the why), not the what.
/r/seduction27/12/21 04:13 AM
1

No problem! Best of luck
/r/seduction27/12/21 01:19 AM
9

Yeah so many people just brush this under the rug and act like they know exactly why a girl feels what she feels. Even we don't know why we feel what we feel. We think we do but there's been a lot of research that shows we usually don't. There's conscious reasons and unconscious reasons, and they often contradict each other.
/r/seduction27/12/21 01:18 AM
2

Okay, well it's either that she senses you're too invested, or she's just not interested in something sexual happening with you but enjoys the attention. Women often want attention more than sex. And they will make you think they might be interested so that you don't pull away the attention. The way to find out which it is, is to do a takeaway by not messaging her at all for a while and see if she pursues at all. If not, she's not interested 95% of the time. And if she is interested, she's on th…
/r/seduction27/12/21 01:14 AM
3

I think you know the answer but you're hoping to hear something else. You're way too invested in this one girl who you haven't done anything sexual with (and she is in a relationship). You need to be meeting other women so that you don't get so hung up over one that doesn't owe you anything. It'll increase your chances of getting her but also will most likely show you that she's not as special as you thought, you just got into a scarcity mentality. Even if you're stuck on the idea that you want …
/r/seduction27/12/21 01:00 AM
3

You weren't there, you're making a lot of assumptions. You're right that he should go for it, but if you make it seem like it's a sure thing and she's super interested he will likely be frustrated and get confused. Chances are he's going to make a lot of mistakes on his first approaches and the flake rate will be very high. Still shoot your shot but keep your expectations realistic. The main reason guys quit is they get a few numbers, get flaked, and start to think pickup doesn't work.
/r/seduction27/10/21 04:49 AM
1

There's a middle ground. If you're taking several hours to go for the pull, that's too long and may backfire. But a lot of girls won't be down to go home with you in ten minutes, I had a pull just a couple weeks ago where she rejected the pull twice before agreeing later. That said, you often can pull pretty much immediately
/r/TheRedPill24/08/21 11:53 PM
2

If you by meet you mean approach I'd say it depends on how picky you want to be. If you're down to hookup with any girl who's relatively cute then about 1/10 approaches would be good. If you're only going for girls who meet other standards (I.E. a decent personality) then it'd be more like 1/20. Those are rough numbers of course
/r/TheRedPill24/08/21 11:51 PM
2

That's nothing more than a mindset. You don't have to feel sexy or good about yourself to talk to women or make a move.
/r/seduction13/08/21 11:22 PM
5

Do you have a good reason or is it just procrastination?
/r/seduction17/07/21 09:52 PM
6

You should repeatedly seduce them rather than falling into a comfortable routine (that kills romance). But I wouldn't say that counts for the challenge, if you're in a relationship maybe you can make a different version of the challenge for yourself.
/r/seduction17/07/21 09:52 PM
7

Preference doesn't mean that they'll never have sex with someone who's bald. A disadvantage isn't the same as a death sentence. Psychology and human behavior are far more complicated and nuanced than people like to think. Simple answers are easy to digest but they're almost never useful or accurate.
/r/seduction13/07/21 06:36 AM
32

Being bald doesn't mean you can't get hot girls. That example is ridiculous. It's a disadvantage (although some guys pull it off really well), but if you think being bald means you can't get laid, you're really not thinking very hard. Also, a girl won't know you have a micro penis until you're naked. By then, it's unlikely she's going to reject you for it (most people won't be that cruel). Might make maintaining girls harder, but you can make up for it by being really good with your hands and to…
/r/seduction13/07/21 06:32 AM
3

My guess is that since the blackpill community got banned their members migrated to other subs including this one. And because their whole identity is about complaining as loudly as possible, they've taken over the voice of Seddit. Most people here probably have moderate views but they aren't emotionally invested enough in their beliefs to feel the need to comment on every post.
/r/seduction08/07/21 05:00 PM
3

This is great advice.
/r/seduction23/05/21 12:58 AM
5

lmao no if you approach 100 women and only 5 like you you're doing something VERY wrong. If your approach to close ratio is 1/100 you have work to do because you're either just not going for the close OR you're doing something that makes most women feel uncomfortable.
/r/seduction23/05/21 12:57 AM
4

It's great that you're taking so much action. If you keep that up you can get amazing results. However, if you're getting no results with that many approaches you're definitely making some kind of fundamental mistake. Most likely, you're doing something that makes the girls you approach feel too pressured and they're getting uncomfortable. For example: - you're approaching from behind and shocking the girls. - you're getting too close into their personal space right away. - you're trying to hard…
/r/seduction23/05/21 12:55 AM
6

Most guys don't pull very much but they're not really trying - they do an approach and reject themselves without asking the number or inviting the girl back to their place. Also keep in mind the 1 out of 40 is mostly guys who've never cold approached in their lives, that's with a total beginner level of experience.
/r/seduction10/05/21 12:48 AM
5

For me it's about 1 in 20 although I've gotten picky over the years if I were to try to pull every girl who liked me it would be more like 1 in 5. For my clients the average is for them to get laid about one in forty approaches. That's an estimate but it's way higher than one in a hundred for sure. Plus a lot of the girls are hot. One guy pulled an international model two weeks ago and he showed me her insta she was a solid 9. People underestimate what's possible with cold approach because the v…
/r/seduction10/05/21 12:42 AM
7

Lol first of all your statistic, "If you are cold approaching random girls, as an average guy your success rate (in terms of "lays") may be 1/100, for a good looking guy it may be 5-10/100." Those numbers are so laughably wrong, if you're getting laid 1 out of 100 approaches you're not really doing game. Secondly, the idea that it's 10 times more likely to get laid from an approach when you're good looking isn't even close to accurate. I coach guys on cold approach and I have clients that range …
/r/seduction10/05/21 12:35 AM
2

What most people in the seduction community need is a push to actually go out and take action since few actually do it.
/r/seduction07/05/21 11:31 PM
6

Oh, you speak for all women? That's quite impressive that you know exactly what every girl who exists wants. Nice, I'm jealous. It's weird though, why do so many of the girls I approach in the street end up going on a date with me and later say thank you for approaching me?
/r/seduction07/05/21 11:12 PM
1

thanks man!
/r/seduction05/05/21 04:13 AM
2

I teach them how to approach in a way that is assertive but also not intimidating to the girl - basically how to maximize the odds that the girl will want to see you again/go home with you. The main goal is to get you to make as much progress towards becoming someone who can effortlessly attract women in any situation whenever he wants. I aim to show clients what is possible and to eliminate limiting beliefs that are holding them back. Most clients either get laid on the Bootcamp or at least go …
/r/seduction22/04/21 04:16 AM
2

You need to be 18 and able to speak English that's about it lol There are some people who I don't take because they don't have an attitude where they're ready to be coached, but most people who are willing to seek it out are coachable
/r/seduction20/04/21 10:00 PM
6

Yeah man, even having sex with women is beta because it gives them approval.
/r/seduction20/04/21 05:26 AM
4

Maybe I'm just not good at website design...
/r/seduction20/04/21 05:00 AM
5

Your math doesn't work out - it's 3000 per weekend for two clients times 4. And bootcamps is only one source of income. How dense can a person be to make all these assumptions? My website is not an important part of my income lol You sound like a guy who is addicted to negativity and likes to make assumptions rather than thinking before coming to a conclusion. You are thinking poorly and contradicting yourself. Period. Get better at thinking
/r/seduction20/04/21 04:34 AM
3

So you have thousands of lays? You implied it quite clearly, learn basic reading comprehension. Your entire post history is just being a dick to random people and getting into arguments. Sad form of existence lol..
/r/seduction20/04/21 04:18 AM
2

Your saying guys approach tons of girls without any liking them which is the mentality of learned helplessness. I've worked with hundreds of guys many of which were well below average and even them a decent percentage of the girls they approached liked them. And I'm well into the triple digits of lays.
/r/seduction20/04/21 04:15 AM
5

Bootcamps = $1500 and I get two clients per week. You can believe what you want. Thinking that cpm is the main source of income for a youtube coach means you know nothing about how it works. Besides your argument makes no sense - if I get views it's just 13 year olds who know nothing. If I don't get views it must not be good because it would be popular. So in your world, everything means the person must suck. Some people do need therapists. Your mentality makes so many assumptions without eviden…
/r/seduction20/04/21 04:13 AM
0

Doubt it, I'm at over 10k approaches. But keep coping with learned helplessness
/r/seduction20/04/21 04:07 AM
-1

Blackpill guy or just someone who doesn't go out?
/r/seduction20/04/21 03:58 AM
6

10k is enough to easily make 6 figures and get multiple bootcamp clients every weekend. I also post more testimonials and infield than anyone else in the industry. But yeah, it's not helping people and with only 3k views per day it's pointless. Your argument makes no sense lol Look at my post history before you comment since I have many posts with hundreds of upvotes.
/r/seduction20/04/21 03:57 AM
-1

If you don't see that this article has practical usefulness, you're blind
/r/seduction20/04/21 03:52 AM
1

I've gone out many times sober and many times drunk. I've done better sober pretty consistently, I'm not anti-drinking or anything. And yeah, when you're sober you're not going to vibe with drunk girls but that's fine, when you are drunk and hook up you barely even know if you like the girl and have very little connection - it's a shallower experience
/r/seduction17/04/21 10:48 PM
3

Good stuff man. Are you sure that you are more charismatic than your friends who are better looking and that your game from a technical standpoint is better than theirs? And more importantly, have you maximized the things under your control in regards to your personality - are you someone who lights up any room you enter and knows how to make people feel what you want them to feel? I'm not a looks don't matter guy but a lot of people complain about their looks holding them back when their person…
/r/seduction14/04/21 03:39 AM
11

Most guys who think like this haven't done the approaches but have somehow decided they already know it wouldn't work because of their looks. They're assuming they know the truth because they learned that looks are everything from second-hand sources. Don't be that guy. Find out the truth through experimentation. Besides, the guys I've met who have done approaches but got zero results all made some blatant mistake like never asking for numbers or coming across as super meek. I've never met a guy…
/r/seduction14/04/21 01:46 AM
1

Saying it takes 3 seconds to determine whether you're attractive needs some evidence backing it up. It's a pretty substantial claim
/r/seduction08/04/21 02:59 AM
1

No problem, glad you enjoyed it
/r/seduction28/03/21 08:49 PM
7

Getting into that state is a skill itself so there's a bit of a chicken and egg problem with this argument.
/r/seduction23/02/21 07:12 PM
1

It's a lot cringier to text too eagerly. Thinking about what's cringey or not is a waste of energy, instead, think about what's effective for getting the results you want. Waiting to text hints that you have a busy life/other options and aren't needy. Since most guys text too fast and too much it sets you apart. My most recent girlfriend even told me part of the reason she went on our first date was that I was aloof over text.
/r/seduction19/02/21 08:31 AM
63

I like the concept here but I would change it slightly: comfort opens the door for attraction to happen. If a girl is uncomfortable she's not going to feel attracted and a lot of guys do weird things that make women feel uncomfortable. I don't think comfort alone sparks attraction but it's a necessary ingredient
/r/seduction19/02/21 08:24 AM
3

This sounds so bitter man. I'm not saying looks don't help, but obsessing over it can never help you. And thinking that your personality doesn't play a major role is something that people with unappealing personalities think. The difference when I'm in a charismatic mood or if I'm in a terrible mood is profound. If I'm coming across as bitter/negative almost every girl rejects me. Do looks make a difference, sure? Is a charismatic guy going to get more opportunities from his approaches than a gu…
/r/seduction18/02/21 02:34 AM
3

The strawman is saying they look like models. Owen Cook, the main guy is average looking at best. Some of the others are above average looking, but none of them would fit in on a runway.
/r/seduction17/02/21 09:52 AM
1

High value is perception, it's not an objective thing. The idea that being wealthy is high value is an illusion too. It is valuable to women who don't have their own financial needs met, but in a quid pro quo kind of way. It's an odd assumption you're making that if you're not successful financially you are creating an illusion of value for women. What is value? More than anything, it's the emotions you make someone feel. That doesn't necessarily have anything to do with your personal success.
/r/seduction17/02/21 09:49 AM
1

I had a phase where I was taking the bus and was pulling hot girls regularly. A lot of them were wealthy too. I don't recommend that lifestyle but it's not a huge obstacle for getting laid
/r/seduction15/02/21 04:21 AM
3

Ignore the comment below, it's just a bitter guy who doesn't have perspective. Honestly, pretty much everything in this post applies to women equally. I've had plenty of experiences where I thought a girl was hot at first but changed my mind because she totally lacked sexual energy. I've also had experiences where I met a woman who I didn't think was particularly attractive, but she was just completely in touch with that energy and it made her sexy. A lot of guys who learn about seduction have t…
/r/seduction12/02/21 05:35 AM
7

This is only true if you're someone who is already comfortable with your sexual energy around women, a large percentage of guys aren't like that. Try not to think from just your perspective but understand that different people have different backgrounds. A lot of men are so ashamed of their sexual energy that they block it out completely and the more they spend time with a woman the more they get themselves in the friendzone.
/r/seduction12/02/21 05:34 AM
4

I'd check out Avatar The Last Airbender if that's what you're looking for ;)
/r/seduction11/02/21 11:28 AM
3

The only point in here that's similar to Mark Manson is reducing masturbation. The rest is completely different. He talks about the desire to be desired but not how to trigger that feeling which is the key concept here. Mark Manson is good for going to bad with women to decent but he can't take you further than that imo. To be fair, a lot of guys learn about pickup just to get a girlfriend, and Manson is a good resource for that.
/r/seduction11/02/21 10:38 AM
2

You have been rejected in that you've asked tons of girls out and they say no or do you mean you assume you would be rejected if you made a move and so you never try? Those are two very different things. How many girls have you asked out in the last few years? If that answer is a small number, that's the underlying problem - there may be tons of girls who find you attractive, but you have to make a move.
/r/seduction11/02/21 08:46 AM
14

If you think 4 pages is too long for advice to be worth reading, then you don't get how learning works. A 100-word piece of advice might sound cool, but without understanding why the concept works and how to implement it, it's not going to make an actual change in your life. If you have this attitude towards learning any skill (pickup or otherwise), you're not going to get very far. We all know that if you want to lose weight you should cut your calories and workout. I could write that in two se…
/r/seduction11/02/21 08:27 AM
2

This is missing the point on so many levels. Yeah, you can get away with doing asshole things like cutting people in line, but if you know them for more than 30 seconds they will resent you and make your relationships unhealthy. Why not just be a good person and treat people with respect while also setting fair boundaries?
/r/seduction11/02/21 12:22 AM
2

That's subjective. Chasing pussy might not seem fun, but when you're getting a lot and you're pulling hot girls consistently it's a lot of fun.
/r/seduction14/01/21 08:44 AM
2

Right, I agree. Although I wouldn't say making a lot of money is objectively more fulfilling than seduction. It's strange to me that you suggested he's primarily doing it to rake in a lot of money rather than to change people's lives for the better.
/r/seduction14/01/21 06:30 AM
2

You're thinking through a scarcity mindset because you don't have many viable options right now. The one time a girl shows you interest, you're getting way too invested even though she's in a different city and likely married. Don't try to meet her, 95% chance that leads to frustration. Even if you could meet her, what's the endgame? Fly across the country to sleep with her one time? Get in a long-distance relationship that requires you to spend hours traveling any time you want to see her? Inst…
/r/seduction14/01/21 03:58 AM
1

Models is good for getting to a point where your game is solid. It won't get you to the top 1% because Mark Manson never got there himself. However, most guys probably just want enough game knowledge to be able to get an attractive girlfriend and have a healthy relationship. Models will do a lot for you in that regard. Saying coaching in dating is a waste of money is like saying getting a personal trainer is a waste of money. Can you follow an online diet/exercise regiment for free and get shred…
/r/seduction14/01/21 03:51 AM
1

Does thinking about this help you in any way? Just experiment and go out as things return to normal as opposed to proactively looking for rationalizations not to approach women in a future scenario.
/r/seduction07/01/21 05:01 AM
3

If you think it's impossible it will be impossible. Sure, if you're in a country where talking to strangers is literally illegal that's a problem. But other than that it's mostly B.S. The people I've known who traveled to Columbia said it was very easy to get laid there. Same goes for Brazil. Maybe you're just making too many excuses? Half your post is about how you're not wealthy/white - sure those advantages, but if you look around you there's plenty of guys who don't fit those standards that …
/r/seduction07/01/21 04:59 AM
-2

Yeah, this is def just a commercial with no point outside of that. You're smart dude
/r/seduction26/12/20 08:26 AM
-2

Stop trying to be savage because you really aren't.
/r/seduction26/12/20 08:26 AM
2

Literal male model good looking guys get rejected all the time, watch James Tusk's rejection compilations
/r/seduction26/12/20 08:25 AM
-1

I think this is an inspiring video because it shows that someone who isn't a male-model by society's standards and who doesn't have much 'game' (yet), is able to get opportunities with really attractive women if he throws himself out there.
/r/seduction07/12/20 08:45 AM
2

Much more likely to work for women because they are more likely to get approached/propositioned while going about their lives. If a man takes that same advice he's likely to end up frustrated because even though women are giving him signals that they're interested, he still has to be proactive to make opportunities into something. Don't get me wrong, if a guy is already got at noticing when a girl is interested in him and he knows how to lead things forward, he may do fairly well in the situatio…
/r/seduction25/11/20 01:45 AM
4

That's a really weird and hyperbolic simile dude. If no one were to reject you that would mean girls in committed relationships were cheating to be with you and that girls of every personality type (drug addicts, gold diggers, etc.) would all want to date you which would be terrible. People who don't get along with you should reject you and you shoudn't have chemistry with every girl, that would be unnatural. We're not robots, we each have our own characteristics and values that don't always mes…
/r/seduction21/11/20 08:01 PM
4

Only if you have a defeatist mindset. If you think of rejection as normal there's no reason it should hurt your self-esteem. Rejection just means there's a lack of chemistry or the girl wasn't available at the time. Doesn't have to mean something is fundamentally wrong with you. If anything, it will help kill your ego and get you to let go of caring too much about what others think of you.
/r/seduction21/11/20 07:46 PM
2

Nope, it doesn't have to be complicated or a competition
/r/seduction19/11/20 11:19 PM
4

Yeah man, I knew this one guy who was 5'2 and he talked to a girl... He's still in jail three years later.
/r/seduction19/11/20 11:17 PM
2

Bro, it's not that hard to get a girl's number. If you think it is, you might want to try for yourself and you'll be amazed. To stage something like that would be stupid.
/r/seduction19/11/20 11:16 PM
4

You can tell if you actually approach women what people act like when they're being paid versus real life.
/r/seduction19/11/20 11:15 PM
11

Thanks!
/r/seduction19/11/20 06:29 AM
17

I made my intentions clear and got the girl's number to see her again. That's the definition of picking up a girl lol
/r/seduction19/11/20 06:28 AM
1

Not an assumption, an educated guess. And there was nothing passive about the comment - I'm openly saying the person sounds like they're making lame excuses and projecting their insecurities to make themselves feel better. Google the meaning before using the word so you don't mess up ;)
/r/seduction19/11/20 06:25 AM
14

So picking them up means you have to have sex? Does it only count if you get the girl pregnant? Please illuminate me as to the definition of 'picking someone up'
/r/seduction19/11/20 06:12 AM
9

I had a client who was 5'5 last weekend. He pulled a 6'1 female model. And the blackpill is an ideology that oversimplifies human nature for the sake of getting addicted to a shared feeling of hopelessness. When you feel like you have no way to improve your situation, it actually is relieving because it means you can avoid doing things that make you uncomfortable
/r/seduction19/11/20 04:55 AM
1

Good to hear man. Sure man, just send a link via a DM on Reddit.
/r/seduction19/11/20 04:12 AM
6

I didn't say it invalidates your point, that's a strawman argument. It invalidates my desire to have a discussion with you. If someone talked to me like that in real life I'd just walk away, as any rational person would. That's what I'm doing here. You can keep going if you want though
/r/seduction19/11/20 04:11 AM
10

Investing in getting with a girl you already know is likely to backfire since the more you think about her the more pressure there is. Usually, the best strategy is to meet some other girls and then when your mindset shifts to where you feel more confident you'll have a much better chance at that one girl who was your crush.
/r/seduction19/11/20 04:08 AM
18

On the date I just go for the pull if the chemistry is good. Kissing can be good for increasing your own confidence (it tells you the girl was attracted to you), but it can also add this pressure where the girl thinks you might be expecting sex and you could get needy or agressive (because she has probably experienced that in the passed with guys who kissed her).
/r/seduction19/11/20 04:06 AM
8

I don't follow up with girls if I get infield of the approach - it's just out of respectfulness since if I did sleep with a girl and she saw the infield that wouldn't be cool from her perspective. So I can't tell you whether it would've flaked since I didn't text her. I can say that similar interactions do often lead to dates but many flake too, I'd guess it was a 50/50 chance. As far as the cons, you aren't allowed to take off your mask in that area, and stopping her wouldn't have been a good i…
/r/seduction19/11/20 04:04 AM
14

Take out all the condescending garbage and there would've been a point in having a discussion.
/r/seduction19/11/20 03:47 AM
20

We're not in agreement. No point in having a discussion with someone being condescending. If you want to make a rational point there's room to talk, otherwise I'm not going to waste more time on this.
/r/seduction19/11/20 03:42 AM
20

My theory is that since most people on the sub aren't taking action (they're still in the paralysis analysis phase which I was in for five years myself), they don't resonate with things that tell them they need to take action. Instead, they resonate with things that make cold approach seem pointless because that reinforces that they are justified in not taking action I also think a certain percentage of the incel community has switched to seduction and other subreddits since it got taken down (b…
/r/seduction19/11/20 03:39 AM
14

Lol okay dude
/r/seduction19/11/20 03:36 AM
18

I get plenty of dates from cold approach but you can think that if it makes you feel good.
/r/seduction19/11/20 03:14 AM
-46

I don't think that's why people stay in. I think that people like to have a one-sided view of it because it makes them feel morally superior. The more nuanced your opinion is, the less room there is for you to feel like you're in the right and others are in th wrong. And that's a good feeling. Maybe I didn't explain it clearly
/r/seduction19/11/20 03:02 AM
3

Yeah, that shows 5% of people having symptoms for 8 weeks which isn't the same as saying 5% of people have permanently reduced lung capacity or heart damage. I'm open to evidence of that but it's not what i've seen up to this point. Also, many of the symptoms sound like anxiety. I'm saying this as someone who's had panic disorder that got triggered from a traumatic event. I wouldn't be surprised if a certain percentage of the people with long-covid aren actually getting anxiety (as opposed to so…
/r/seduction19/11/20 02:59 AM
-50

You don't think it's accurate? This seems like an example of mass dunning-kruger effect: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect#:~:text=In%20the%20field%20of%20psychology,recognize%20their%20lack%20of%20ability. Everyone thinks they're an expert but most of us have a very surface-level understanding of the situation and don't realize that the information we're getting tends to be biased one way or another.
/r/seduction19/11/20 02:51 AM
18

I wouldn't consider myself a pickup artist, that's kind of a pretentious title that doesn't accurately describe what I do. Dating coach is more accurate. You've got a strange narrative going through your head that only desperate girls can be picked up. Sounds like you're rationalizing that approaching women is creepy to give yourself an excuse to not have any women in your life. But maybe I'm wrong.
/r/seduction19/11/20 02:48 AM
-49

If everyone stayed inside except for essential tasks for at least this year, possibly more, what do you think the long-term effects of that would be? I mean, going out and socializing would be off the table. Seeing anyone other than people you live with would not be an option. Online dating is almost risky as cold approach so you wouldn't do that. So at that point, how many people would end up with severe depression or develop new addictions? I do think you should mitigate the risk as much as yo…
/r/seduction19/11/20 02:44 AM
88

She did give me the vibe she wanted me to kiss her at the end but kissing a girl doesn't guarantee something will happen. If anything it lowers the chances you'll see the girl again. Plus, kissing a bunch of girls during the pandemic seems like a bit much to me. If I'm on a date with a girl I think it's fine but I'm not gonna do it en masse Plus, pulling wasn't an option given her circumstances (going to a restaurant with friends). There is no guarantee any particular girl will go out with you b…
/r/seduction19/11/20 02:38 AM
2

I don't think I'm downplaying it unless I'm using bad data but I'm directly quoting the CDC. This virus is very dangerous for people over 80 and not much at all for people in early adulthood. From what I understand, if you're under 35, it's less deadly than the flu in that age category but if you're older it becomes far more deadly than the flu.
/r/seduction19/11/20 02:38 AM
6

The use of the word if makes it sound like surviving is rare. Second, the evidence I've seen shows that long-term effects of covid are rare, 2% or less: https://www.bbc.com/news/health-54296223 Third, you're stating that you can get it twice as a fact but that's inaccurate. There is evidence of some people getting it twice (https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/11/more-people-are-getting-covid-19-twice-suggesting-immunity-wanes-quickly-some), but that's rare and the tests aren't completely accura…
/r/seduction19/11/20 02:36 AM
9

The plague had a 70% fatality rate. This has somewhere in the range of .5-1%. For people between 20-49 the survival rate is 99.98%: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/planning-scenarios.html Now, if you live with someone who is at high risk or are in regularly close contact with them, I wouldn't be going out. If someone else I meet does live with someone in that situation but they're going to Vegas or another crowded area, that's on them taking that risk (imo). Plus, picking up girls …
/r/seduction19/11/20 01:34 AM
166

In this interaction, the girl was with a large group of friends who were heading to a restaurant so my time was limited. But you'll see that I'm able to make a good impression in a few minutes with strong nonverbal communication, creating a sense of mystery, and an overall playful, yet sexual demeanor.
/r/seduction19/11/20 12:41 AM
3

Depends on how you define fuckboy. Do I have a lot of sex? Yeah. Am I the kind of guy that women see as having no value outside of sex? Definitely not.
/r/seduction28/10/20 05:03 PM
11

tl;dw - If you have approach anxiety or are not in a social mood, you can warm up by simply complimenting people as they walk by. It may sound dumb, but it will change your state and get you into a mood where you want to socialize. Give it a shot and let me know how it goes
/r/seduction27/10/20 10:08 PM
1

Weak minds get weak results
/r/seduction19/10/20 01:36 AM
1

You're deluded man. I know plenty of stereotypically good looking guys who get almost no action. But if having an excuse makes you feel better, keep at it
/r/seduction17/10/20 10:18 PM
3

tl;dw - Reason 1: You don't make your intentions clear (you come across like a friend). Reason 2: you don't make specific plans with girls. you will get less flakes if you make plans for a date while you're still interacting with a girl rather than doing it over text. Reason 3: You don't let girls invest, you're the one putting in all the work. Simple way to change this is to let silences hang so the girl fills it and puts more effort in.
/r/seduction04/10/20 03:34 AM
5

It's not exclusively for men, it's for anyone
/r/seduction04/10/20 02:08 AM
2

That's what's known as a strawman argument. And I don't think you know that most women would say attraction is almost entirely based on appearance alone. You're making a lot ofassumptions and leaps in logic
/r/seduction02/10/20 12:36 AM
1

They had a boyfriend they didn't mention or they were attracted but not invested enough to go on a date or any number of other possiblities
/r/seduction01/10/20 04:42 AM
3

Those studies are just what people say they like on a survey. How well that matches real-life behavior is questionable at best. And even if those studies are accurate in that women care about physical attractiveness (which most of us can agree they do care to an extent), they don't show how much of it is looks versus personality versus a variety of other factors. People overestimate what psychology is capable of proving, especially from correlational research (correlation can't prove anything wh…
/r/seduction01/10/20 04:41 AM
0

She can do the same things men do and if her goal is to get laid it will be much easier. Some men will be intimidated but those men probably wouldn't have been good in bed anyway, so it's not a big loss. If she's looking for a relationship, that's a different situation. The most popular coach for women looking for a relationship is Mathhew Hussey but I'm not sure if he's good tbh
/r/seduction01/10/20 12:11 AM
2

You're welcome :)
/r/seduction01/10/20 12:09 AM
4

You think in the past most men had no problem getting the girl they wanted without settling or being desperate? Seems like a big assumption. Even today, most men can get a girlfriend every once in a while but it's random and it's rarely the kind of girl they really want. The same was probably true then. That's where pickup advice comes in. You haven't given any evidence to support your number 31, you're just saying it's true because it's true. There's also the other side of that coin: it's not h…
/r/seduction01/10/20 12:09 AM
1

It might be cool to have a reddit seduction sponsored wingman finder. There's plenty of people here that it could be done. For now, game global is the only decent option I know of although some cities are inactive.
/r/seduction30/09/20 11:59 PM
1

you're welcome :)
/r/seduction30/09/20 11:57 PM
1

May be true. So far the pics that have done well on Photofeeler have also done well on Tinder and some of the pictures I thought were good got very low rating on Photofeeler
/r/seduction30/09/20 11:57 PM
2

Thanks man! I'll keep writing articles like this - writing is my background more than making videos
/r/seduction30/09/20 11:56 PM
1

You know this from a lot of experience of doing approaches? Or is that just an assumption based on societal norms and what people have told you?
/r/seduction30/09/20 11:56 PM
1

The point of it is if you have too much approach anxiety to go direct. It's a crutch for overcoming resistance to approaching. If you don't get that resistance, just go direct.
/r/seduction30/09/20 11:55 PM
2

Other than myself, I like Honest Signalz, Tay Social, Karisma King, and Austen Summers. I can't speak for or against their coaching but their free videos are good and their infield is helpful
/r/seduction30/09/20 11:54 PM
2

It might have gotten autocorrected, it's supposed to be Vocular
/r/seduction30/09/20 11:53 PM
1

Depends on the environment. In a bar or club it's usually 33% or so (I could get more if I asked every girl but I only go for it when there's mutual interest). In a daygame environment it's usually about 50%. I'd say about 30% of numbers I get lead to a date. So, in an average 2-hour daygame session I might do 20 approaches, get 10 numbers, and 3 dates.
/r/seduction30/09/20 11:52 PM
2

It's just photofeeler.com
/r/seduction30/09/20 11:50 PM
2

It's pretty easy to tell which infield is real when you've done a decent amount of approaches.
/r/seduction29/09/20 11:26 PM
5

tl;dw - Both Todd V and Brian Black are great at picking up women. Brian Black does a lof of things very well - he's funny, carefree, and leads without hesitation. The one criticism is that when he's talking he sounds monotone and bored with what he's saying. Todd V is very witty and great at the art of push-pull. Similar to Brian, my biggest criticism of him is that his voice doesn't sound as passionate and 'punchy' as it could
/r/seduction29/09/20 01:14 AM
1

tl;dw - Both Todd V and Brian Black are great at picking up women. Brian Black does a lof of things very well - he's funny, carefree, and leads without hesitation. The one criticism is that when he's talking he sounds monotone and bored with what he's saying. Todd V is very witty and great at the art of push-pull. Similar to Brian, my biggest criticism of him is that his voice doesn't sound as passionate and 'punchy' as it could
/r/seduction29/09/20 01:12 AM
2

tl;dw - Pickup advice gets a bad rap in mainstream culture. To be honest, some of that criticism is deserved. There is advice out there that has an underlying 'win-lose' mindset (You get laid = win. Women are an obstacle to your goal. Do whatever it takes to win, even if it's manipulative). That said, picking up women doesn't have to be misogynistic or manipulative. Seduction is one of the core aspects of being human (it's the reason you and I exist), and I believe it's important to learn how to…
/r/seduction25/09/20 04:34 AM
1

Tl;dw - The Single Guy has a very popular YouTube channel in which he gives advice about how to attract girls, but is he another generic, feel-good channel with no substance? Or does he actually know what he's talking about? Justin Marc is also quite popular and he posts a lot of footage of himself picking up girls, but just getting a number doesn't mean the girl will show up to a date. So, does he have game, or is he just a skilled marketer? The short answer is that both coaches are pretty good…
/r/seduction23/09/20 03:26 AM
2

tl;dw - In this video series, I compare the hidden camera footage of different me's dating coaches to sort out which coaches practice what they preach and which ones are internet marketers with little experience picking up women. Adrian Gee has over a million subscribers and is possibly the most popular YouTuber who sells a pickup course. UMP is more of a niche brand with 5,000 subscribers that teaches technique-based game (which is rare in 2020). The short explanation is that both have good gam…
/r/seduction20/09/20 10:42 PM
2

tl;dw - It's enticing to look for a magic pill that will cure approach anxiety. But the truth is, the only way to overcome it is to go through it. Tony Robbin has a quote, "Once the pain of staying the same is greater than the pain of changing, then you will change." When it comes to approaching, you may have to throw yourself in environments where you can approach women a number of times before you finally gets fed up with making excuses and you say, "fuck it, I'm approaching her." But if you p…
/r/seduction16/09/20 03:15 AM
0

lol
/r/seduction14/09/20 11:31 PM
0

The fact that his weird negative answer got upvotes says something about the mentality of guys on here.
/r/seduction14/09/20 06:43 PM
1

Now you know and you can move on. Plus you gained valuable feedback that you can take lessons from. There's a good chance you're staring too much at girls when they're across the room (making eye contact is good, but there's a threshold where it goes from intriguing to creepy). Don't take her response to mean that you are inherently creepy, but that something you did turned her off and think about how you can do it differently in the future.
/r/seduction08/09/20 05:12 AM
2

tl;dw - Not that long ago, I weighed 215 pounds (28% bf which is over the obesity threshold). Now, I weight 175 and a significant portion of the change was due to cold approach pickup. Walking isn't the most intense cardio, but it does burn a good amount of calories and even if you burned an extra 200 per day that you did pickup, that would add up to a lot of weight loss over the course of a few months. So, if you're among the 70% of Americans who are overweight, you can use pickup to kill two b…
/r/seduction08/09/20 05:10 AM
3

Agree 100%. She probably picked up on your hesitance and it turned her off. She may have rejected you anyway, but if you approached her the second you first wanted to, she probably would have been a lot more polite about it.
/r/seduction08/09/20 05:05 AM
1

tl;dw - One: There are good girls and there are sluts. The sluts should be treated sexually whereas the good girls should be treated platonically until you eventually earn the opportunity to go on a date with them. This leads men to neuter their interactions with the women 'they really like' and ineveitibly gets them rejected because without any sexual tension, there isn't a reason to date you.\ Two: Women have higher self-esteem than men It is true that women get a lot of validation on apps lik…
/r/seduction01/09/20 03:02 AM
1

He definitely has game dude, you're just watching it with blinders on focusing on his physique. Also you have no way to know if he gets more girls than both of them, that's a completely arbitrary assumption with no evidence
/r/seduction30/08/20 10:05 PM
2

If you can get laid you can transition that into a relationship but it's a different skillset. The easiest way to get into a relationship with a girl is to fuck her well.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/20 08:40 PM
1

Tl;dw - Many of the dating coaches out there don't have the skills they teach. In this video, I break down infield of two popular men's dating coaches to find out who has game and who is a good internet marketer with no pickup skills.
/r/seduction30/08/20 03:33 AM
0

I do lift, I'm not ripped or anything but I have gone from obese to about 16% BF. I never said it's not good to lift, I think everyone should do it, but I don't think it solves all your dating problems automatically. I know multiple guys who are shredded but who still struggle with women do to internal issues
/r/TheRedPill28/08/20 09:35 PM
2

I partially agree, I think it's both. Physical value is a relevant value that will make a girl more willing to invest in you emotionally, but it's not the only type fo value. But I like your advice and the mindset behind it, I agree with your frame of mind.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/20 09:34 PM
0

Good explanation
/r/seduction28/08/20 06:04 PM
7

The ones that care are ones that you probably don't want in your life anyway. Most girls won't reject you for having a 2006 Toyota. I pulled plenty of hot girls when I used to have a 2003 Aerio (shitty car) and I also wore shitty clothes from target. Those things matter slightly, but it's how you make her feel that matters most.
/r/seduction28/08/20 06:04 PM
1

I like that line, I'll try it out for sure
/r/TheRedPill28/08/20 03:11 PM
5

Smallminded thinking. You really think it's impossible for a guy who isn't jacked to get a lot of girls? You're smarter than that, right? Also, you know most of the Red Pill thought leaders (including Rollo) are not men who are shredded, right? So, if not lifting is a disqualifier then the whole foundation of the community is disqualified.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/20 02:54 PM
2

I would never sleep with a girl and record the approach without getting her permission.
/r/seduction26/08/20 08:04 PM
1

Thanks!
/r/seduction26/08/20 05:18 PM
1

Nope, never met before.
/r/seduction26/08/20 05:18 PM
3

Boring in that I don't say anything crazy like you would usually see in infield or prank videos
/r/seduction26/08/20 05:18 PM
1

I think I was using a Rode Wireless Go which is a solid wireless mic but it has a weak range, I switched to this more recently: https://www.amazon.com/Sennheiser-Digital-Wireless-Microphone-System/dp/B011LAA1OW/ref=sr_1_11?crid=2XWSAAN0MGHAM&dchild=1&keywords=sennheiser+wireless+microphone+system&qid=1598462231&s=musical-instruments&sprefix=sennheiser+weireless+%2Cmi%2C172&sr=1-11 The mic is under my shirt and will pick up someone else's sound find if they're relatively close.
/r/seduction26/08/20 05:17 PM
2

Wrong, a lot of these short interactions will lead to dates. This is a really common misconception in the seduction community. Now, a 5-10 minute conversation is ideal, but I've gotten many dates from 1-minute interactions. Especially in the day because getting approached during the day is rare for a girl and she'll remember you. Just as one example, one of my closes friends met his girlfriend from a 2-minute daygame approach and the girl was very attractive and also a very cool person.
/r/seduction26/08/20 05:15 PM
4

Thanks man
/r/seduction26/08/20 05:22 AM
12

This is one of the simplest infields I've ever recorded. There's nothing flashy about it, but that's why I like it. Yes, there are advanced techniques you can learn that are helpful. But most of game is about the core fundamentals. And in this video, I do those well enough. I hold strong eye contact, I'm not reactive, I show intent, and I go for the close. This wasn't my best interaction, and I probably could have gone for the pull, but approaches like this will often lead to dates (I'm speaking…
/r/seduction26/08/20 03:31 AM
1

The more you experiment with the concept, the more you realize how much power there is in it.
/r/seduction25/08/20 03:23 PM
1

Lol, definitely messed that up :X. Fixed now
/r/seduction25/08/20 03:21 PM
0

Are you taking action or just complaining?
/r/seduction08/08/20 07:29 AM
2

Yeah, well my parents had me when they were very young and didn't have their lives together and my upbringing was pretty chaotic as a result. I think that's a common problem that would be lessened if more people waited until they were more mature and financially stable.
/r/seduction08/08/20 01:27 AM
2

And the things you learn from books will click on a deeper level because you have actual experiences to give you context.
/r/seduction08/08/20 01:25 AM
1

I like that concept from Atomic Habits as well, however, I've personally found it tricky to implement. I'd like to pursue it further though
/r/seduction08/08/20 01:24 AM
2

Yeah, with the whole Covid situation it depends on your interpretation of the data. If you think the mortality rate is high enough that it's a significant risk to approach women (while social distancing/wearing a mask), then yeah, wouldn't be a good idea. You could still do online dating and virtual dates at the very least, though.
/r/seduction08/08/20 01:23 AM
1

So, in terms of measurable results, has that worked?
/r/seduction08/08/20 01:21 AM
2

Quite possibly a good idea. Having children young causes a lot of problems for a lot of people.
/r/seduction08/08/20 01:21 AM
1

Harsh way to put it, but accurate. If you're the kind of guy who's waiting for society's permission by being in good enough shape or wealthy or whatever, you're basically showing a weak mentality and a lack ofpersonal power.
/r/seduction08/08/20 01:20 AM
1

Having a kid would be a serious problem, it's not that hard to avoid though. I mean, condoms work 99.9% of the time, plus most of the women you'll hook up with will also be on birth control. Just don't go raw and you'll be fine lol. Or if you're really concerned you could still get blowjobs and never have to worry about getting someone pregnant.
/r/seduction08/08/20 01:19 AM
1

Strawman argument. You're talking about morbid obesity. If you're on the far end of the spectrum looks wise (like the bottom 1%), then yeah, that will significantly impact your results. Even then, it wouldn't be that hard to get a date with a decently cute girl, I just wouldn't expect regularly getting stunners. I knew a guy who was in the bottom 1 out of a thousand looks wise and he did well pulling relatively attractive women. And his game sucked too, he just took a lot of action.
/r/seduction08/08/20 01:17 AM
1

Ripped in 3 months? Depends on your starting point. I guess if you're within the average range you can get into pretty good shape, not like Brad Pitt in Troy level fit though.
/r/seduction08/08/20 01:15 AM
0

Ever heard of the concept of a strawman argument? Did I say you shouldn't get ripped or make money or anything? Did I say you should focus on pursuing women above everything else? Or is this a reading comprehension problem?
/r/seduction07/08/20 06:56 PM
1

Did I say you shouldn't get swole? Are you muscles so big they're taking energy away from your brain?
/r/seduction07/08/20 05:56 PM
7

Mostly because it's a narrative that allows you to avoid the discomfort of rejection. If you "build yourself then they will come," is pleasing to our ego so we are happy to accept it and even spread the idea to others.
/r/seduction07/08/20 05:54 PM
9

I don't know what your disagreeing with? I didn't say it was bad to do research or reflection. Simply that if you are telling yourself that you'll start taking action at some mythical point in the future when you're 'made it,' that's a recipe for indefinite procrastination.
/r/seduction07/08/20 05:52 PM
0

How has that worked out for you so far?
/r/seduction07/08/20 05:48 PM
7

Wrong. I know plenty of guys who are ripped/rich and who don't get laid at all. Now, guys with those qualities who take action have an advantage over those who don't, but I also know plenty of frumpy poor guys who have no problem whatsoever getting hot girls.
/r/seduction07/08/20 05:47 PM
10

Did I say you shouldn't work out or make more money? No.
/r/seduction07/08/20 05:44 PM
1

I know lots of swole guys who can't get laid.
/r/seduction07/08/20 05:44 PM
1

Nothing wrong with getting rich or getting ripped, I think you're missing the point here.
/r/seduction07/08/20 05:43 PM
2

Definitely.
/r/seduction07/08/20 08:53 AM
1

IDK, depends what you mean by legit. I've pulled a lot of attractive women in my life and my clients make tangible progress (getting dates, getting laid, etc.).
/r/seduction07/08/20 07:11 AM
1

Not sure what this means lol
/r/seduction20/06/20 05:47 AM
1

They don't have infield and are therefore don't fit in the list. They may be great coaches, but honestly, from what I've seen, I doubt they've gotten impressive results in their own lives.
/r/seduction20/06/20 05:47 AM
2

That's great to hear!
/r/seduction18/06/20 01:08 AM
1

I'll listen to both again. I asked other people what they thought and overall more preferred the shotgun mic. Also, I'm in a new house that is not at all ideal for audio (I'm working on it though).
/r/seduction18/05/20 05:31 AM
2

Sounds like someone spends too much time in the basement. Here, share an audio of yourself approaching a woman - if your personality has even the slightest amount of charm or positive energy I'd be shocked. Is it really surprising that someone who thinks like this has trouble with women? Is that energy attractive in any way? I've had interactions with beautiful women who had similar negative energy and I was so turned off I left. But keep coping bro, if this blackpill shit makes you feel good in…
/r/seduction18/05/20 05:29 AM
1

Money mostly helps with logistics. If you have money, you can afford to live in an area where there are a lot of attractive women nearby. Other than that, showing off wealth backfires in the early stages of a relationship because it makes the girl think of you as someone who's trying to show off and earn her affection as opposed to just being attractive
/r/seduction17/05/20 07:37 PM
1

The audio is coming from a Rode shotgunmic that's more expensive than the one I'm holding lol - I just used the one in my hand as a backup and to compare the quality
/r/seduction17/05/20 07:35 PM
8

Of course, some of the stuff about approaching women doesn't apply during quarantine, but it does at any other time.
/r/seduction06/05/20 08:05 PM
2

Saying that is only making you look like an idiot. You've devolved to namecalling without anything substantial to say, I'm sure you're better than that.
/r/seduction27/03/20 06:00 AM
3

Thanks! This was actually a free sample of a book I'm working on - I wanted to share it to get feedback - and it's good to hear stuff like this.
/r/seduction27/03/20 05:27 AM
2

People who resort to calling people idiots instead of making a real argument are just too proud to admit they lost the argument and have nothing logical to contribute.
/r/seduction27/03/20 05:26 AM
2

I've pulled a good number of hot girls going in extremely direct (even though I tend to be more indirect). Personally, I haven't found that it lowers your status in her eyes unless you flinch and seem like you don't believe she'll like you. You didn't reply to the point I made about taking action, have you done a lot of approaches and had a lot of experience or have you mostly taken in theory?
/r/seduction27/03/20 03:21 AM
2

If you think telling a woman she's sexy always lowers your value, you're probably spending way too much time taking in theory and not enough time approaching real women.
/r/seduction27/03/20 02:50 AM
2

I have plenty of other videos of every type of guy including short Asian guys: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltsOOXrV1kQ You can look at things through your preconceived notions but you might want to be careful to question what assumptions you might be making and whether your beliefs protect your ego in some way. I.E. thinking, "That guys in good shape, doesn't mean anything" might be a way to give yourself an excuse to not approach because he has something you don't. But the excuse is arbitra…
/r/seduction26/03/20 02:30 AM
3

tl;dw - This is an infield video in which you can see someone who's brand new to pickup approaching women. His first attempt at approaching women was only a week before this. In his first session, his interactions were quite short and although he got positive reactions, there was a lot of room for improvement. I gave him a few tips and you'll see that his interactions were quite a bit better. The most important point to take from this is that if you make a point to identify you're mistakes you c…
/r/seduction25/03/20 08:02 AM
1

This is an interesting question. I'm not sure if I agree with the premise that when you're self-amusing you can't also calibrate/escalate/or flirt. Personally, I would say calibration is my method. I'm not following a rigid structure, but based on what the girl is feeling, I calibrate. (I.E. If a girl is giving me signs she's interested, I escalate or if she's being icey I might exaggerate the situation to make it funny). I'd say I'm self-amused most of the time when I'm meeting girls but I'm al…
/r/seduction23/03/20 02:38 AM
1

Based on what I'm seeing, your ego is way too fragile for you to be someone who's actually pulling hot girls. Guys who are killing it don't get so triggered so easily. Work on yourself, your wasting energy with this. Anyway, blocking you because this is a waste of time/energy.
/r/seduction23/03/20 01:44 AM
1

Funny thing is you didn't dispute the actual point which proves it's true. Why are you so mad? If your ego is really that fragile, you should do something to build some inner strength - like cold approaching for example.
/r/seduction23/03/20 01:38 AM
0

Which perfecly matches the way I'm using the word... Anyway, I'm done wasting my time with this discussion.
/r/seduction23/03/20 01:36 AM
0

By that definition, anytime you have an interaction where nothing was explicitly asked for, there was no rejection. So if you approach a girl indirectly and she tells you to fuck off, she didn't reject you. If that's your definition, cool. It's not a useful one imo
/r/seduction23/03/20 01:25 AM
0

Rejection doesn't have to be mean. You can approach a girl and realize you're not as attracted to her as you thought from a distance (or based on first impression) and then say, "It was nice meeting you, have a nice day." If you can't see that I don't know what to tell you
/r/seduction23/03/20 01:21 AM
0

Blah blah, go do some approaches so you know what game actually looks like and what rejections look like.
/r/seduction23/03/20 01:20 AM
1

tl;dw - I've never seen infield footage in which a guy actually rejects women, but this is something you should be doing on a regular basis. Not to get revenge on women or something, simply because you won't have chemistry with every girl you approach. Plus, the fact that you're willing to reject women will make you more attractive - you won't come across as needy because you haven't immediately decided that the girl is a prize you want to chase. You're deciding whether or not you like her, not …
/r/seduction22/03/20 06:05 AM
1

Good!
/r/seduction19/03/20 08:08 PM
5

Thanks man! And yeah, anxiety plays a role but it can be overcome. The way to reduce your anxiety when interacting with women is mostly experience. If you were approach say, 20 women on a night out, your anxiety would mostly (if not entirely) be gone by the 20th approach. This is one of the main reasons that cold approach is so important - it desensitizes you to anxiety. Obviously, in most countries, now isn't the best time for that. But when the quarantine is over, that'll be the way to get ove…
/r/seduction19/03/20 08:06 PM
5

You're going to have a much better time getting into a relationship with a woman if there's a lot of sexual tension. That's the spark. Without the spark, she will likely see you as a friend.
/r/seduction19/03/20 08:03 PM
1

Most, but not all. A lot of the content here applies to both men and women, the audience just happens to be mostly men.
/r/seduction19/03/20 08:01 PM
32

It was so long that you felt compelled to read the whole thing? Cool man, good to hear. PS: SithLordJediMaster probably isn't the best username for being taken seriously on a Seduction subreddit :X
/r/seduction19/03/20 05:30 AM
0

And how many women have you approached in the real world or asked out?
/r/seduction17/03/20 09:04 PM
1

The irony is that the real coping is telling yourself "I'm not genetically blessed enough so there's no reason for me to try." This line of reasoning gives you an excuse to avoid doing something that would put your ego on the line. Rejection is intimidating. Making yourself vulnerable is uncomfortable. Do you know what's a lot more comfortable? Coping by staying at home and telling yourself there's no point in approaching.
/r/seduction17/03/20 09:04 PM
2

I've been going to bars and clubs for 7 years but I still wouldn't claim to know for certain what the dynamics are. I have some pretty educated theories, but I know there's a lot of room for error as human behavior is incredibly complex and it's hard to know exactly what causes what because there are so many factors at play. For instance, it's hard to know how much looks are a factor versus your personality because you can't totally separate one from the other. Any girl you meet is going to judg…
/r/seduction17/03/20 03:28 AM
7

Have you consider the alternative that maybe higher quality women tend to be less obvious in showing interest? The girl who knows she can have any guy she wants has less reason to chase a guy than a girl who's less attractive. It's also possible that you have a filter and don't notice the signs from more attractive girls. I know that in the past there were times when someone would tell me a really attractive girl was into me but I didn't see it at all because of my inner beliefs about my own val…
/r/seduction17/03/20 03:21 AM
3

Sounds a bit early in terms of experience to draw definitive conclusions and share them as fact. I'm not saying you're wrong, but a year of experience and having slept with 5 women isn't a lot to go from. Are you familiar with the Dunning-Kruger effect? It's something that's important to be aware of, especially if you're going to teach others.
/r/seduction17/03/20 03:19 AM
9

You get a lot of attention and sleep with beautiful/high-quality women consistently?
/r/seduction17/03/20 01:31 AM
40

Thanks for sharing this! It's unfortunate but a lot of coaches in the seduction community are taking a strange machismo stance about this saying things like, "Everyone is a sheep for canceling all these events and such. The virus is not even that dangerous lol." A lot of guys don't seem to get that it's not all about fear for our own lives as individuals, it's about a social duty to not spread a virus that can harm others. Good to see something reasonable and well thought out about the virus in …
/r/seduction16/03/20 07:51 PM
6

Tl;dw - In this video you'll see what a solid daygame session looks like from someone who's been going out for several years. The footage is only 5 minutes long and in that time I get two cute girl's numbers. If you add in the time between interactions, it took about 10 minutes to get 2 numbers. So, if you stretch that out, I would have gotten about 12 numbers in an hour at that rate. That's a little bit on the high side, but from going out with a bunch of different guys, it's realistic to get 5…
/r/seduction14/03/20 02:52 AM
7

Yeah, the last point is something a lot of people aren't considering. They're thinking, "Well, the mortality is really low for people in my age group, so why would I care?" Because you come into contact with people who have a higher risk and you could spread it to them. I suppose if you have a lifestyle in which you can avoid interacting with people other than young women, go for it, but I'm not sure who that's realistic for.
/r/seduction14/03/20 12:27 AM
4

It's ironic to make a post talking about fluff in a post that has nothing but fluff. You don't have one specific detail or any logical arguments to support your point. The farthest yo go is to say "PUA's are preying on men," just using an emotionally charged work like 'preying' doesn't mean you made an actual point. Try using examples or getting into specifics. You said PUA's also post on incel subs, but you didn't provide a single example (and I can't think of any on the top of my head). I also…
/r/seduction12/03/20 12:20 AM
2

This isn't a guide by any stretch of the imagination, the title is pretty misleading.
/r/seduction11/03/20 01:44 AM
1

I might even make an infield video about this because it's an interesting question and I think I could pull off natural but slightly nervous as well as cool calculated pretty well.
/r/seduction09/03/20 05:50 AM
5

Agreed. People tend to say they want things that are societally acceptable (I want a nice guy), but their behavior is driven by factors that are often a lot more primal and amoral. Simple example, if you asked people if they value eating heahtily, the majority of people would say yes. But, if you looked at their actual diets, most of them are eating a ton of crap. We want to create the appearance of having traits that are socially desirable and because of that you can't really trust what people …
/r/seduction09/03/20 05:49 AM
2

I've read Mark Manson. Pretty sure he says that there are yes girls, no girls, and maybe girls and that the point of game is to be able to get maybe girls to become yes girls. That's VERY different from a girl is either attracted to you or not and what you say/do has no impact on that. This mindset that attraction is purely based on appearance is disappointing to me because it is oversimplistic and I've never seen a genuinely good argument supporting that. Do I coach? Yes. I'm I selling somethin…
/r/seduction08/03/20 09:33 PM
6

Upvotes does not mean a post it accurate, it means it resonates with the people on the subreddit. Oftentimes, the stuff that resonates with people is what reinforces their ego in some way or gives them comfort. Why might the idea that attraction is binary and that you only get it if you're good looking enough bring people comfort? Well, if you're not good looking, you now have a valid excuse not to approach or try to date women UNTIL you've increased your 'SMV'. That means you can procrastinate …
/r/seduction08/03/20 09:24 PM
1

Are you saying this after having a wealth of experience with cold approach and coming to the conclusion that it wasn't effective? Or are you like someone who wants to lose weight but says "I have bad metabolism, diets won't work for me," yet, they've never actually spent more than a couple weeks following a diet and counting their calories. My money is on the latter.
/r/seduction08/03/20 02:45 AM
1

That's one aspect of many. I'd say the biggest difference between good sex and bad sex is how much you desire the other person and how much you get caught up in the moment (rather than overthinking and being insecure). Now, knowing someone well can help with making you comfortable, but being experienced in bed and just being confident in yourself have the same effect. In my experience, a one-night stand is the riskiest type of sex in terms of how good it is: there's a higher chance of it being b…
/r/seduction05/03/20 07:51 PM
1

I think everyone knows what is implied when you describe someone as "dear". Either you're feigning ignorance or you're genuinely unaware of the well-known connotation of the word. If that's that the case now you know: dear is extremely condescending when used in an argument.
/r/seduction05/03/20 07:48 PM
1

Maybe the sex isn't good for you. That doesn't mean the same is true for everyone else.
/r/seduction05/03/20 06:27 PM
1

My dad used to say he'd kill me if I didn't use a condom lol
/r/seduction05/03/20 06:26 PM
4

Using a condescending word like "dear" takes away from your point and makes it seem like a personal attack rather than a logical argument.
/r/seduction05/03/20 06:24 PM
2

You're using the notion of scientific fact extremely loosely. "Science says that having multiple partners lead to weaker pair bonding." Even if several studies give evidence for that, it's not a scientific fact. Especially in psychology - it takes A LOT of studies to have strong evidence for something. There are so many variables in psychology that one study can't really count for them all. For example, a study showing that multiple partners leads to weaker pair bonding could have another root c…
/r/seduction05/03/20 06:23 PM
5

You have to be more specific when you say "these tips". There are very different types of pickup advice some of which are nothing more than: be confident, don't hide your intentions, and lead things forward. Some advice is more manipulative in nature, but I wouldn't say that's the majority of modern content I see here. You're making a broad stroke criticism that only applies to a certain percentage of pickup - if this were 2005, the post would make a lot more sense, but it's not. The most popula…
/r/seduction04/03/20 04:39 AM
10

If you're going to think like this just watch porn and stop wasting your time reading about people who actually go out and talk to girls.
/r/seduction26/02/20 02:50 AM
1

How often do you get laid from meeting girls who show you signs of interest while you're going throughout your day?
/r/seduction24/02/20 07:04 PM
5

Where are you doing daygame? Having coached a lot of guys, these numbers seem pretty bad. Most guys I coach (even those who've never done daygame before) get about half the girls they approach numbers. (this applies to guys who are below average looking as well). If you're getting instant-rejected a lot there might be something off about your initial approach. Many guys approach girls who are walking in the same direction as them and start talking while they're still behind the girl. This is sta…
/r/seduction24/02/20 07:01 PM
1

Thanks man!
/r/seduction21/02/20 10:49 PM
3

I suppose if your definition of success is getting a girlfriend that makes sense. I think most people will assume success = get laid.
/r/seduction21/02/20 01:53 AM
2

You can easily record audio on your own. Just get some earbuds that you can lay over your shirt and record with your phone.
/r/seduction20/02/20 07:16 PM
4

Where are you getting these .2% and .5% success rates from? I can confidently say it's MUCH higher than that in my experience. And although the success rate is lower among people who are new or not particularly confident/charismatic, it's still A LOT better than .2%.
/r/seduction20/02/20 07:15 PM
5

Thanks :)
/r/seduction20/02/20 03:34 AM
13

Very true. Best place to start is by opening with compliments and approaching girls from the frame of "I want to make her day better for having met me," as opposed to, "I want her to like me/date me/have sex with me." Charm is a skill that you can practice.
/r/seduction20/02/20 03:34 AM
26

In this video, you get to see raw footage of a man's first ever attempt at approaching women. This video is important because one of the biggest things that holds guys back is unrealistic expectations. When you watch infield of coaches or of famous YouTube pranksers, you're watching footage of someone who's spent years building a skillset. They're confident and smooth because they've approached thousands of women. It can seem impossible that you would be able to do what they're doing. And in tru…
/r/seduction20/02/20 01:51 AM
2

If you only want an answer from the OP, send them a direct message.
/r/seduction19/02/20 07:43 PM
37

This isn't accounting for the fact that MANY women on Tinder are bots.
/r/seduction15/02/20 07:59 PM
2

This would only be misogynistic if it only applied one way. But if you're a woman and want to make someone your boyfriend (or if you're lesbian, etc.) the best thing you can do is have mind-blowing sex with them. I'm not saying sex is the only factor and that who you are doesn't matter, only that if you're really good in bed the person you slept with will probably want to see you again. And if you want to start a relationship with someone, that's an important factor. Game is just a term that's u…
/r/seduction12/02/20 10:08 PM
16

Have you tried doing much approaching to find out for yourself? Did you complete the action plan at the end of the book? You can make anything make sense theoretically in your mind. But it's almost impossible to discern what is truly logical and what is just being fueled by preconceived notions and emotional biases. At least if you go out in the world, you'll have some hard evidence to base your beliefs on - you'll see how women actually react to your approaches. There's still a lot you can't kn…
/r/seduction12/02/20 09:43 PM
1

I don't think I at any point said something implying that you shouldn't get consent and if I did I will immediately change it.
/r/seduction12/02/20 01:14 AM
3

Point out the comments you consider misogynistic, I will take great care to consider your specific criticisms.
/r/seduction12/02/20 01:05 AM
3

What am I not leaving for you to decide? Not sure I understand your point tbh. The better you are in bed, the more likely it is a girl will want to see you again and therefore, if you want her to be your girlfriend, it'll be much easier for you to make that bad. Imagine the opposite. The sex was terrible. Do you really think she's going to want to get in a relationship with you? Or you can go the traditional route of waiting for sex until after you're already in a relationship, but then you don'…
/r/seduction12/02/20 12:49 AM
14

Wouldn't it be preferable if when you get to that point you have a good idea of what to do?
/r/seduction12/02/20 12:46 AM
1

Then it would be reversed, it's just in the majority of cases women won't play the dominant role. Personally, I like it when a woman is dominant some of the time as well, it's just not something you can expect and if you try to push them into it that usually don't work out great in my experience.
/r/seduction12/02/20 12:45 AM
2

Do you mean how to get more sex drive?
/r/seduction11/02/20 07:52 PM
2

Tl;dw: Women will rarely tell you they're attracted to you. But they will show you they're attracted. Knowing how to tell when a girl likes you will help make sure that you don't miss opportunities (most guys miss A LOT). Here are the 5 most important 'tells' women will give when they're interested: She will hold strong eye contact. She fills silence by asking you questions. She laughs, even when you didn't say something particularly funny. She touches her hair often. She accepts your touch. In …
/r/seduction09/02/20 05:03 AM
1

That said, I'm not perfect, I still get triggered sometimes. The other night, I approached two girls and the one I was talking to was loving it, but her friend immediately started yelling at me to, "Go away." This set me off - I tried to tell the girl that she should treat strangers with respect and she could tell me to leave without being rude about it but she wasn't listening and I got increasingly frustrated until I told her, "You're not being a good person." Looking back, I gained nothing fr…
/r/seduction07/02/20 07:06 AM
1

Partly it's just experience, I've gotten enough harsh rejections that they don't really get to me anymore. I also know that if someone is rude without provocation, it says more about them than myself - they're probably stressed out in general and just projecting that onto me, it's nothing personal. All I can do is wish them well and hope their situation get better - I try to be empathetic instead of self-centered. Rejection only becomes a big deal when your ego gets involved, so I try to focus l…
/r/seduction07/02/20 07:03 AM
5

As useful as infield footage can be, there are some problems with it. The footage you're shown is like a highlight reel, you're seeing the best approaches and this can give you unrealistic expectations of what meeting women should be like. No matter who you are, you will get rejected, a lot. And that's perfectly fine, you should expect it. In this video, you'll see me get rejected multiple times. I want to show you what pickup really looks like, not some fantasy that is impossible to live up to …
/r/seduction06/02/20 05:52 AM
1

XD
/r/seduction24/01/20 09:11 PM
3

My favorite is, "Do you have time for coffee with a cute boy?" Or any variation of calling himself a cute boy in the third person. That one seriously makes me cringe.
/r/seduction24/01/20 08:45 PM
15

Yes, you're 100% right that most people who consume pickup content don't go out, yet they have strong opinions about how attraction works and whether or not 'game is real'. My guess is that it's just an example of the dunning kruger effect. Basically, guys tell themselves "game doesn't work, you're either attractive enough or not" and because I'm not very attractive, I might as well not approach. Then, they tell other people this with the passion of an evangelist because they want to save other …
/r/seduction24/01/20 08:43 PM
10

Something I don't think people consider is the possiblity that the girls interest or lack thereof when you approach might not be purely because of your appearance. Look at Todd's approach, he's pretty awkward right from the beginning - his body language is uncomfortable, his tonality is a weird combination of pretentious and submissive, and the lines he's saying are pretty weird. Maybe they were no girls because of how he looks or because they were unavailable. But maybe they were no girls becau…
/r/seduction24/01/20 08:35 PM
11

Thanks man, that's an uncharacteristically positive response for Reddit lol.
/r/seduction24/01/20 08:28 PM
7

I take guys out from the group in my city to do approaches out all the time and even the worst looking ones with the least social skills can get a positive reaction and a girl's number I'd say 25% of the time. And those are the real hardcases. Now, does that mean they're getting tons of dates, no, but they're not getting really negative reactions from girls (everyone once in a while, but not regularly). Maybe this is partly because I tell them to open a positive note (with a compliment) and to n…
/r/seduction24/01/20 08:05 PM
3

1 out of 10? That's not been my experience lol. That would be the case if you lack social skills. As long as you're positive/charming, most interactions will go well, even if the girl isn't attracted to you, the conversation won't be particularly awkward.
/r/seduction24/01/20 07:57 PM
1

A lot of people use the terminology 'force attraction' lately, does that come from a particular coach or YouTuber? Perhaps AMS (Alpha Male Strategies)? This is something that gets brought up constantly these days and I'm curious where it comes from.
/r/seduction24/01/20 07:56 PM
1

thanks!
/r/seduction20/01/20 06:46 PM
2

Consider that a lot of times even when a girl does like you, you don't end up getting laid. Throughout the average guy's life, there are probably dozens if not hundreds of times (this is the case for me) in which he shared mutual attraction with a girl, but he didn't lead it forward. Just because a girl finds you attractive doesn't necessarily mean she'll sleep with you. And there's also a difference between finding you attractive and being invested in the idea of seeing you again (as opposed to…
/r/seduction20/01/20 06:46 PM
1

tl;dw - Social circle game has been a popular topic in this community over the last few years. Social circle is almost like the ketogenic diet of pickup: it quickly went from a small niche to overwhelmingly popular and it promises fast, easy results in comparison to alternative methods. Social circle game isn't a scam - you definitely can meet women through building a social circle. However, the way it's marketed is extremely misleading. People are lead to believe that social circle is an easy w…
/r/seduction17/01/20 05:04 PM
14

That's probably because they're not used to it. Also, a lot of men are really bad at handling rejection, there's a whole subreddit dedicated to it (r/niceguys). That said, sometimes women really freak out over being rejected in ways that are pretty crazy, it's like it does not compute and gets all the wires crossed.
/r/seduction17/01/20 06:34 AM
1

Here's a video in which I do just that: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cndzoQkJPns&feature=youtu.be It actually can work some of the time and if you have a strong enough frame, but I also think it's coming from a bad mindset - I.E. I want to have sex with this woman simply because of her appearance and I don't care if she's an awful human being and terrible to talk to. Is sex always a good experience with any woman simply because she's hot? That hasn't been the case for me. Sex is good when the…
/r/seduction16/01/20 09:03 PM
2

Its basically the belief that if you got handed a bad hand genetically (short, bald, small frame, acne, etc.)you need to accept your fate that you won't ever be able to date attractive women. Black pill is about embracing hopelessness. At least that's my understanding, I dont know much about the community.
/r/seduction15/01/20 12:24 AM
2

There's also been a lot of incel/blackpill type of comments on here too. Might be because the incel subreddit got closed down so they had to go somewhere.
/r/seduction14/01/20 11:03 PM
3

Do you think arrogance makes people receptive to your message? Or do people have to respect you and have a general sense of rapport with you first? If people feel attacked, they're going to get defensive. You can be crass and assertive in a way that people are more open to, but they have to relate to you on some level first.
/r/seduction12/01/20 10:48 PM
3

I can handle you lol. You don't seem to have a basic grasp of social awareness, you say things in a way that makes no one want to listen to you. I imagine this lack of self-awareness is causing problems in your dating life too. But if I'm wrong and you're killing it, keep doing what you're doing.
/r/seduction12/01/20 10:42 PM
2

The point you're trying to make is valid, just the way you're going about it is off-putting.
/r/seduction12/01/20 09:22 PM
1

Thanks for sharing man, there's a good chance someone reading your post will be inspired to take action like you did. There's definitely a momentum to game and if you do 5-10 approaches as opposed to 1-2 you will not only get more results, but you'll also find yourself getting into a really positive mood AKA "state" or "god mode".
/r/seduction12/01/20 12:48 AM
6

Congratulations lol. 20 isn't even that good, real MPUA's do 1000 approaches in a 24-hour marathon. Maybe your ratio of approaches to numbers is low because when you approach girls you come across as condescending as you do when you brag about yourself online. Food for thought.
/r/seduction12/01/20 12:45 AM
5

Quoting you is putting words into your mouth? I don't personally have a problem with approach anxiety at this point, so I'm not sure how I'm a 'personal example of your post'. You didn't make an argument here, just completely switched the topic to a weird attack on my character. This is what people do when they don't really know what they're talking about. Now you're actually twisting what I'm saying - the idea that approach anxiety exists isn't a negative mindset, it's a lived experience shared…
/r/seduction11/01/20 10:11 PM
4

I think there's power in the concept of reframing negative labels like "anxiety" in a more positive way." However... You're making a pretty bold claim when you say that, "I still can't believe that guys in and around the seduction community are teaching that 'approach anxiety' is a thing." And, "Just spreading that nonsense has caused millions of guys to buy into the fact that what they are feeling, a sense of a GO signal, is actually a flight or freeze signal." I was looking forward to seeing y…
/r/seduction11/01/20 09:39 PM
2

Oh, and here's an infield video of a short asian guy approaching a hot white girl: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltsOOXrV1kQ I can cite plenty of experiences in which I've seen guys of every race pull home attractive girls (of pretty much every race as well). Is race a factor? Of course. Is it nearly as important as most guys think it is? Not at all
/r/seduction06/01/20 09:15 AM
2

"There are even statistics that prove this." There are statistics that prove non-white men can't get a girlfriend? I'll bet you $10,000,000 there are no legitimate statistics saying this. You could argue that people of different races get less matches on dating apps or have a higher statistical chance of being single, but that's far-fetched from what you're saying here. Just look around you, men of every race have girlfriends, that's an easily verifiable fact. "I tried to stop think about it and…
/r/seduction06/01/20 09:12 AM
1

What are you talking about? I get tons of dates from phone numbers. If numbers don't lead to anything, you need to improve your game. Numbers aren't always the best option, but to paint them as useless is severely misguided.
/r/seduction03/01/20 10:10 PM
13

Have you done both direct and indirect approaches many times and through that experience you've found direct is less effective? Or are you speaking theoretically?
/r/seduction03/01/20 10:08 PM
1

Well, I need some more specifics. When you say you've been trying cold approach for a while what exactly do you mean? How many approaches do you do in an average week? What's the most approaches you've done in a week? How many girls have you asked out in a single week? (obviously, I don't expect you to know exactly, just your best estimate) A lot of the time guys say they've been practicing cold approach, but what they really mean is they've gone out a few times and done a handful of approaches.…
/r/seduction01/01/20 12:38 AM
2

tl;dw The underlying reason so many men struggle to attract women is something known as a scarcity mindset. A scarcity mindset is the belief that something is rare and difficult to obtain. In dating, it's the belief that it's hard to get dates with attractive women. We fall into scarcity because even though there are tens of thousands of attractive women in any city, we only interact with a handful of people in our day-to-day lives. If you have a crush on a girl at work, and she's the only cute …
/r/seduction31/12/19 11:14 PM
5

Believing you can attract a girl with your personality doesn't necessarily believe you can attract EVERY girl - that's an unhealthy type of entitlement. When someone is giving you very clear signals that they're not at all interested, it's very awkward to try to push it further. When someone is giving you neutral responses, that's one thing. But 'plowing' even when a girl is saying, "Please go away," is just disrespectful and a waste of both your time and the girl's time. They were bad technique…
/r/seduction18/12/19 07:54 PM
7

Yeah, but it was a really bad rejection - he didn't take no for an answer and kept persisting well after they were uncomfortable. Plus he said some bizarre stuff about being depressed to try to guilt them into giving him a chance to talk to them.
/r/seduction18/12/19 07:43 PM
2

I remember this clip being from one of his products, but I don't remember saying he was doing badly on purpose. If I remember correctly, I think he said he thought the girls were being stuck up and he decided he was going to keep going until they left (instead of him leaving).
/r/seduction18/12/19 07:42 PM
2

Great tips man.
/r/seduction16/12/19 04:53 PM
2

Your mindset is all wrong. You're coming across obstacles and you're thinking about why those mean it's impossible and nightgame sucks etc. etc. Instead, think about possible solutions and what you could do differently. Obviously, plenty of men have found success in nightclubs. Have the mindset that you're going to figure this shit out rather than basically giving up after one try. Imagine someone went to the gym one time, they tried to lift 50-pound dumbbells, they failed, and they said, "Takin…
/r/seduction14/12/19 06:21 AM
1

The first one is flat out wrong, you can approach by talking in a loud club you just have to be loud and to get in close enough so that she can hear you.
/r/seduction14/12/19 06:17 AM
1

Of course they can. Read the Art of Seduction by Robert Greene, many of the examples he uses are women, and in fact, he claims seduction was basically invented by women as a means of gaining power (in a world where men had all the advantages).
/r/seduction09/12/19 11:11 PM
3

Interesting idea, thanks for the suggestion!
/r/seduction07/12/19 01:58 AM
3

Online dating is qualitatively different from in person dating, extrapolating the data from dating apps into real-world interactions is unscientific at best. So much emotion. People are known to think logically about things when something makes them really emotional, right?
/r/seduction07/12/19 01:55 AM
3

These arent the most scientific numbers. Perhaps, just perhaps, the 80% of men that don't have much sex are staying in their houses watching Netflix and playing video games. Scanning for choosing signals is such a bad way to go about dating. The vast majority of the women I've slept with didn't give me 'choosing signals'. But hey, if believing it's totally helpless for you makes you feel better, keep at it.
/r/seduction06/12/19 06:21 PM
1

Maverick is a club lol.
/r/seduction06/12/19 04:51 AM
1

I live in Tucson part-time, send me your number in a DM and we'll link up.
/r/seduction06/12/19 04:51 AM
2

Very rarely does that happen. And even if it did it could be because of some kind if rookie mistake you're making repeatedly and you just need some feedback.
/r/seduction05/12/19 01:00 PM
2

Most of them five up after less than 100 approaches which like givng up on the gym within your first month
/r/seduction05/12/19 12:31 PM
1

Of course man, if you ever have any questions about game, send me a dm and I'll do my best to help.
/r/seduction05/12/19 06:02 AM
2

Yeah, of course, most of this comes from taking action and getting experience. Knowing the theory just helps you move in the right direction faster and to catch your own mistakes. That's why like half of my articles are about taking more action lol.
/r/seduction05/12/19 01:12 AM
-2

That's not true, many many guys who read about pickup don't actually practice it. Anyway, since you're spending most of your words on being condescending, I'm going to waste more time responding.
/r/seduction04/12/19 09:22 PM
1

People who don't go out much and actually approach women will have difficulty believing the crazy shit thay happens when you do, especially if you have ywars of experience under your belt. Even in the infield I linked I said, "You're going to have to take my virginity." And she enthusiastically replied, "okay!" You can see and hear that happen. Believe what you want.
/r/seduction04/12/19 09:08 PM
2

The same principles largely apply in all social interactions.
/r/seduction04/12/19 07:14 PM
12

I think there is a difference. Manipulation is done for your own gain regardless of negative consequences for someone else. Telling a woman you love her when you only want a one-night stand would be manipulation. Influence is done for everyone involved to gain. Using sales tactics to convince to buy a product you genuinely believe will improve their life is influence.
/r/seduction04/12/19 06:08 PM
1

Contradictory how? Repulsive how?
/r/seduction04/12/19 06:05 PM
1

Thanks lol
/r/seduction04/12/19 04:51 PM
9

What's the difference between manipulation and influence? Why can't you just be skilled in influence?
/r/seduction04/12/19 04:50 PM
2

Thanks man! If you ever have any questions, feel free to send me a DM and I'll do my best to help.
/r/seduction04/12/19 04:50 PM
4

So, when someone calls you cringey, giving opposing evidence is defensive? That's silly. If you want to have a productive discussion, you should focus on the actual points, not on ad hominems "that's cringey" "you're being defensive." When you include things like that, it discredits the value your point might have brought.
/r/seduction04/12/19 04:47 PM
7

There's a lot of online men's dating coaches who have very little real life experience in what they teach. The point of getting infield footage is to show that you actually know what you're talking about. If you want to give actual reasons that my approcah towards meeting women is manipulative, I'd be happy to hear it. But right now, you're just making accusations without evidence.
/r/seduction04/12/19 04:35 PM
5

A lot of emotional language there. Do you want to actually make an argument or are you just throwing out unsubstantiated claims to feel powerful on the internet? You should get attention in a real way - it's not that hard.
/r/seduction04/12/19 04:32 PM
3

Yeah then most famous men's dating coach of that decade is autistic (Owen Cook), and he figured this shit out.
/r/seduction04/12/19 04:07 PM
-5

That wasnt advice, it was an interaction that actually happened. If you think I'm making women cringe, here's a video done bringing a girl home from a couple weeks ago: https://youtu.be/QnE1QJk0eJM
/r/seduction04/12/19 03:59 PM
68

Lol, well we've all been there, just learn from it and improve. Edit: actually, a lot of guys haven't been there because they never go out and meet women.
/r/seduction04/12/19 06:11 AM
1

A coffee date is only boring if the people on it are boring. If you do something too epic it can also come across like you're trying way too hard to impress her. Going shopping and trying clothes or playing pool are fine first dates, the rest of the suggestions are a bit too much imo.
/r/seduction02/12/19 06:32 PM
11

That is a factual statement.
/r/seduction02/12/19 04:28 AM
18

Nothing here implies getting in bed with someone is your only motive. Is it impossible to want to have sex with someone while also valuing them as a human being? I also make it very clear in the post that if you get any signs from a girl that she's not interested or is uncomfortable that you need to stop and respect her. And this whole thing is a strawman argument, you're saying this is pushy and weird without giving an example or reason that it is that way. Obviously I'm not saying being pushy …
/r/seduction02/12/19 03:32 AM
25

Its gross because a man in a date with you is interested in having sex with you, or what? Criticism is welcome and I'm always open to different opinions. This isn't really offering any specifics or reasoning, it's just saying this is gross because its gross, boo.
/r/seduction02/12/19 02:55 AM
31

A much more elegant strategy.
/r/seduction02/12/19 01:49 AM
3

I agree with what you're saying here. I don't get the sense he cares much about his clients either lol. He made 3 expensive online courses in a single year (all about game), to me that sounds like someone who cares more about money than helping people. I just think you took it a little far saying he brainwashes people and makes their lives worse - unless you have examples of how he's doing that.
/r/seduction01/12/19 06:56 PM
7

Nor do I. Is it impossible to disagree without it turning into a fight? I'm simply claiming that your points need substantiation. You're really tearing into this guy, so you should have some good arguments to back that up. And I'm not defending Madison. I don't particularly like him myself tbh, but that doesn't mean he's brainwashing people and making their lives worse off. Maybe he is doing that, but that isn't self-evidently true.
/r/seduction01/12/19 06:50 PM
1

Great response.
/r/seduction01/12/19 06:29 PM
8

Who would have thought that if you try to play mind games with the guy giving a speech, he would give you a 'smartass' reply?
/r/seduction01/12/19 06:28 PM
6

"From my view, working on yourself first and going through real transformation is the most organic and real way to live a happier life, not a step by step process that gets mediocre results in the end and ultimately makes you more miserable." There are so many problems with this sentence. "Not a a step-by-step process that gets mediocre results in the end and ultimately makes you more miserable." How do you know it gets mediocre results? How do you know this style of pickup makes you more misera…
/r/seduction01/12/19 06:26 PM
1

He definitely has good game. Bu I agree that he's not a very good coach. He doesn't know how to properly organize his thoughts, nor does he have a deep understanding of what his clients need (he thinks from his own perspective, not that of others). And yeah, generally, his content just isn't that helpful IMO, it has some good principles, but it's poorly structured and not nearly practical enough.
/r/seduction01/12/19 06:20 PM
2

You could get charged for anything by anyone by that definition and might as well stay at home avoiding all human interaction. Anyway, I'm not going to waste more of my time on someone who is making strawman arguments while also being condescending to total strangers.
/r/seduction30/11/19 10:32 PM
-2

So talking about anything sexual is harassment even if the girl was clearly enjoying it? News to me.
/r/seduction30/11/19 10:26 PM
-4

Here's a video in which I literally walk up to girls and ask them if they want to have sex within a few minutes of meeting: https://youtu.be/cndzoQkJPns Is it a good technique? No. Can it work? Sometimes.
/r/seduction30/11/19 07:51 PM
6

Most underrated pickup channel on YouTube. Although I think that will change in the coming months.
/r/seduction30/11/19 12:39 AM
0

I'm above average looking, but definitely not a male model. I used to technically obese and it was still definitely more than 1 out of 30. Where do you get 1 out of 30? Whose statistic is that? Some of the coaches who make claims like that don't have very good game themselves. I've heard some of the London daygame model guys say it's a very low percentage but a lot of them have 0 charisma, no real intent, and mediocre verbal game. I've also heard Todd V say he can pull one girl out of three appr…
/r/seduction29/11/19 07:46 PM
2

You can't know the statistics. I mean, maybe you and your group of friends largely have the same stance but that doesn't apply to all women. There's a good chance there's things you and your friends have in common, for example maybe you're religious which might make you less open to cold approach (just a random example, there are many possibilitie). But you and all your friends don't necessarily represent society at large. Some women don't like it, but if the guy can tell and walks away its rare…
/r/seduction29/11/19 05:47 AM
0

Okay if you're right that 9 times out of 10 it's unwelcome, then you have a point. But how do you know that? Have you done approaches in grocery stores? I haven't done many approaches in grocery stores so I can't speak to that but I've done plenty of approaches in malls and I'd say at least 80% of the approaches are well received (some say oh I have a boyfriend but that's really nice of you), and I've gotten a good amount of dates from doing that. Imagine the roles were reversed, would you be cr…
/r/seduction29/11/19 05:29 AM
1

I doubt he's standing around waiting. But anyway, it's creepy because it is creepy isn't really much of a reason. I'm not saying you're wrong, you might be right. I just want a real logical reason rather than a cliche. Is the idea that intentionally looking for hot girls to approach is creepy a real thought or just a platitude passed down from the cultural narrative?
/r/seduction29/11/19 05:08 AM
3

Society has taught you that desiring women is "hunting" and you've learned that it's creepy. There is a degree of truth to this, some men are predatory, that's for sure. But this conditioning has taught you that desiring women is inherently creepy which is not at all true. In fact, it's often the opposite, it's often romantic and liberating. But hey, the more people who think this, the less competition there is. So that's a good thing for the guys who get it and know that many women actually lik…
/r/seduction29/11/19 04:56 AM
2

You know this because you're psychic? You know what every woman in the world wants? A girl I approached while shopping the other day literally just sent me a text saying, "Thank you so much for everything. I'm so glad that I met you." I can show you the screenshot if you want. And I get responses like that regularly. Women like men believe it or not, especially men who are honest in their intentions and who know what they want. As long as you take rejection gracefully, the vast majority of your …
/r/seduction29/11/19 04:48 AM
2

How long have you been doing this? I've been going out for many years and although I usually don't track my stats in that way, I did last week. I did 13 approaches and got 2 lays. That's pretty repeatable in my experience. When you're newer there's a lot more luck involved, as you get more experience the ratio only gets better. Although it's not worth obsessing over because if you don't approach you get 0% and if you do approach it's going to be higher than 0%.
/r/seduction29/11/19 04:48 AM
4

It could be that they're not getting invested enough (meaning the conversation was too surface level, you didn't make a deeper connection). Or it could be that they just wanted to hook up on the first date and you didn't make a move. A lot of times, if a girl wants a one-night stand and you don't make it happen, the window closes.
/r/seduction28/11/19 10:24 AM
1

What a lame comment.
/r/seduction28/11/19 10:23 AM
1

Okay, thanks man.
/r/seduction27/11/19 03:43 AM
1

Simple pickup removed their own videos a long time ago and changed the channel name. Although Street Attraction isn't the only channel that's been taken down recently, Bradicus, SquattinCasanova, and a couple other channels have been removed by YouTube.
/r/seduction26/11/19 11:24 PM
1

I didn't do it secretly without his permission... But yeah, if being challenged in the slightest offends you, we probably wouldn't end up being friends.
/r/seduction26/11/19 08:44 PM
1

I think their fourth coach, Willy Beck is pretty damn good. The infields of the main three aren't as impressive, but I believe they were getting dates with attractive women, they just weren't at the highest skill level. Jesse revealed his girlfriend in one video and there's no denying she was beautiful and a really cool person.
/r/seduction26/11/19 07:11 PM
2

The irony here is that you aren't giving me a specific enough description to know what exactly should be cut out. It's almost like you're proving the opposite of your point, I don't really know what you mean unless you give me context and specifici examples. Hypothetically, I could just say, "Go out and approach women every week and you'll get dates." But without knowing exactly why you should do that and why you haven't been doing that, it's basically meaningless advice.
/r/seduction26/11/19 06:48 PM
1

Consider this, if their girlfriend approached them, they didn't choose their girlfriend. How likely is it that the girl that chose them is their 'dream girl'. Not very. There's a difference between being able to get a girlfriend and being able to get an amazing girlfriend.
/r/seduction26/11/19 06:46 PM
1

How much have you tried? Quantify it into number of approaches in the last year. A lot of guys feel like they failed even though they only did, say, 30 approaches. That's akin to saying you failed to get ripped after going to the gym for two weeks.
/r/seduction26/11/19 06:44 PM
2

I mean, if you'd rather play video games or watch TV than meet women, there's nothing wrong with that. For me, video games were a coping mechanism to avoid discomfort. But that's not true for everyone. This only applies if you actually want an exciting dating life, for some people other aspects of life are more compelling. Some day we'll all be lying in our beds hooked up to some full-dive virtual reality video game anyway, lol.
/r/seduction26/11/19 06:43 PM
1

I still think that sometimes when I'm out and I see a guy getting positive reactions from a girl I think is hot. And I've been going out for years. It's just human nature to compare ourselves. But if you catch yourself you can become aware of those thoughts and let them go.
/r/seduction26/11/19 06:40 PM
1

Okay, and how do you plan to do that? The general idea that you're going to take action is a great start. The next step is to iron out the specifics.
/r/seduction26/11/19 06:38 PM
1

It's true. And people tell him he looks like Ashton Kutcher but more ripped.
/r/seduction26/11/19 06:38 PM
1

Thanks for the recommendations, man. All those tips make sense to me except number 4, I've tried using anchors, but never found it worked, just felt like a gimmick to me. Is there a particular technique to make it work or is perhaps just not for everyone?
/r/seduction26/11/19 06:37 PM
2

Yeah, I'm speaking to a general audience. If you're in the bottom .1% in every major area, this doesn't necessarily apply to you. There are exceptions to every rule. If you're life is in that bad of shape, I'd probably work on socializing more in general (join groups on meetup.com, join a church, things like that), getting fit, and getting a better job.
/r/seduction26/11/19 06:21 PM
8

I'm doing my best to fight against that trend. I recommend you do the same.
/r/seduction26/11/19 05:43 PM
1

You're right, emotional communication and charisma are very important. But charisma only mathers if you're meeting women in the first place And the best way to become more charismatic is to go out and socialize, you can't become charismatic until you're comfortable putting yourself out there. You can supplement that with charisma courses (do you have a specific recommendation?). Just look at the charisma course like creatine, it will help you gain more from your workouts, but it does nothing if …
/r/seduction26/11/19 05:40 PM
2

Do both. Improve your appearance, just done use it as an excuse to procrastinate (that doesn't work out).
/r/seduction26/11/19 03:52 PM
2

Oh, and I do understand what it's like to struggle to leave the house. I was diagnosed with panic disorder after the sudden death of my father and just being in public made me feel like I was dying. I spent years doing inner work, but my anxiety didn't get better until I started facing my anxieties head on.
/r/seduction26/11/19 03:44 PM
7

This just sounds like an elaborate version of the problem I'm talking about. People want to hear that there is some other, deeper problem that they need to work out first before taking action. Hearing that reinforces their identity and helps them feel justified in taking a course of action that doesn't get results. I coach too, and I've had many clients who lost their virginity, found a girlfriend, etc. And that isnt to say pickup solved all their problems, but it did improve their lives. Maybe …
/r/seduction26/11/19 03:42 PM
4

It takes you 15 minutes to read 500 words? Maybe you should take some reading classes.
/r/seduction26/11/19 03:31 PM
22

Give examples of what you would consider fluff. Otherwise, this comment is (quite ironically) fluff.
/r/seduction26/11/19 05:51 AM
7

You're basing this on how many numbers you've gotten? And it wouldn't be a bad idea to record some of your approaches and share them on Reddit seduction to ask for honest feedback. If people tell you you're charismatic af and have amazing game. Then you can blame your looks. If they say you arent coming across as confident and fun, then maybe you should focus in changing that before jumping to such dire conclusions.
/r/seduction26/11/19 05:03 AM
10

You learned that women play mind games like this from doing hundreds of approaches?
/r/seduction26/11/19 04:50 AM
11

Lol this is so departed from reality. I've gone out with tons of guys (short, bald, physically unattractive) who are consistently able to get positive responses from women. If you can't get girls to want to talk to you your personality is the problem, a woman doesn't have to think your hot to enjoy a conversation with you. Based on the way you're describing women it sounds like you are extremely judgmental of them and that's probably coming across in the way you talk. I'd recommend recording you…
/r/seduction26/11/19 04:50 AM
11

Some guys use that as an excuse, they will only approach the '9s' and '10s' and somehow, magically, no girl meets their standard for approaching. I prefer to at it as a 0 or 1, is the girl attractive or not? If she meets that threshold, talk to her. Less room for your ego to get involved if you don it that way.
/r/seduction26/11/19 04:42 AM
7

How many girls have you approached? Do you approach with a compliment or something else?
/r/seduction26/11/19 04:39 AM
11

Yeah, too much content without enough action can actually make you worse off rather than better. Strategy has its place, and if it's a supplement to real world practice it can improve your rate of progress. But it can also be a form of productive procrastination.
/r/seduction26/11/19 03:36 AM
77

It's true. The seduction community at large used to have the mindset that it's all about taking action and getting reference experiences. Hopefully, we can bring that mindset back to the community.
/r/seduction26/11/19 03:25 AM
1

Do you actually approach girls and ask them out or lead things forward in any way?
/r/seduction23/11/19 02:12 AM
4

How is this upvoted, those lines are not good by any stretch of the imagination. It's just not relatable whatsoever. Have you actually used those lines successfully? In real life?
/r/seduction22/11/19 05:14 AM
1

Correct me if I'm wrong, but you seem like someone who has watched a lot of videos, but who doesn't go out and do approaches much themselves. Have you cold approached more than 100 women in your lifetime? Some of your points are valid, but overall it comes across as like a sports fan talking to his friends about what the athletes should be doing better. Easy to find faults from that perspective, but no one's perfect and just because one of the players made mistakes, doesn't mean they're bad, the…
/r/seduction20/11/19 11:34 PM
2

You determine whether you should do something based on whether a fictional character would do it? Seems like an odd way to live.
/r/seduction19/11/19 11:38 PM
2

You could argue the exact opposite: that men don't push themselves in game because they're bought into the societal ideal of finding true love. Now, I'm not saying you're wrong, but there's two types of conditioning going on and it's not easy to know which one is false and which is real. We are conditioned by some sources that to learn that approaching women is creepy, that wanting casual sex is creepy, etc. And from this side of the coin, we learn that finding 'the one' is the only thing that i…
/r/seduction19/11/19 11:36 PM
7

I didn't say she does have a boyfriend, simply that she might. It's possible she made up the boyfriend, sure. But people on this sub seem to forget that about half of women actually have boyfriends and sometimes, getting rejected has nothing to do with you doing something wrong or not being good looking enough or whatever, she just wasn't available. I have no idea how you would know whether girls in commited relationships give their number out or not - seems like a difficult thing to keep track …
/r/seduction18/11/19 04:13 AM
10

Or maybe she just didn't mention that she had a boyfriend. Flirting with random people can be fun even if you're not available - sometimes it's easier to just go with it and mention the boyfriend later rather than ending the interaction abruptly. Not everything is a shittest, a lot of it is just random circumstances.
/r/seduction18/11/19 03:31 AM
7

Most don't, this will be the case in any dating scenario though, at clubs, online, etc. most of your 'openers' aren't going to lead to something. I would estimate I'll go on a date with about 1 out of 10 girls I approach. Sometimes they have a boyfriend/aren't interested. Sometimes I just don't feel like I have chemistry with the girl (it's important to have standards beyond just wanting to sleep with any attractive girl). Most of the approaches that don't lead to anything are still a mutually p…
/r/seduction14/11/19 05:03 AM
44

There are a few problems with this reasoning. First, just because some women don't want to meet a guy in public doesn't mean they all don't. I've gone on many dates with girls who I met on the street and those dates have turned into everything from one-night stands to long-term relationships. If women generally don't want to be approached in that way, why would it lead to such results? Second, you're saying that the guy who approach you are only into you because of your looks. Well, if that's th…
/r/seduction14/11/19 12:56 AM
1

This is a great post, can you provide some picture examples?
/r/TheRedPill08/11/19 10:19 PM
1

I went out on Halloween as Borat in a green mankini, got approached at least 30 times. It was very easy to pull that night. A friend of mine wears pants styled after the U.S. flag and got approached regularly (in a positive way). I've also seen feather earrings work quite well. On the other hand, I have a friend who did steroids to increase his SMV so that women would approach him (not technically peacocking, but basically the same idea). And women do occasionally approach him, but not particula…
/r/TheRedPill08/11/19 10:18 PM
1

They only hate it if you do it in a way that comes across as try-hard. It's mostly in the delivery and how reactive you are. Flirtatious banter takes practice to get right, but it can definitely create sexual tension if done well. Look up "Russel Brand flirting" if you want examples of what this looks like at the highest level.
/r/seduction07/11/19 05:53 AM
1

Awesome. Not many coaches show this kind of stuff, but it's important to see that everyone gets rejected and it's a totally normal (and unavoidable) part of the process).
/r/seduction05/11/19 05:22 PM
3

I used to think that women stopped giving me shit tests as I became more grounded. But then I started recording my interactions and I noticed there were quite a few by the numbers shit-tests. I just wasn't thinking of them as shit-tests because I knew the girl was into me, shit-tests don't register when you're grounded, doesn't necessarily mean women will stop doing them, it's part of the female screening process (is this guy going to get reactive/needy, or is he actually a cool, mature guy?).
/r/seduction05/11/19 03:23 AM
1

This guy thinks he knows everything after doing 75 approaches. That's like someone who's been going to the gym for a month deciding they're a fitness expert. Everything he's saying is based on stuff he's read/seen on YouTube, he has very little evidence to back it up.
/r/seduction05/11/19 12:15 AM
1

This.
/r/seduction01/11/19 02:03 AM
1

It's impossible to know for certain whether it was something within your control or out of your control - but overall if you improve the things under your control, you'll end up getting better results. Even if you're very physically unattractive you can make anyone enjoy talking to you if you're charming enogh, if you're getting constantly rejected and can't hook girls, it's probably because you're not fun to be around. I've seen so many examples of guys who blame their looks but their personali…
/r/seduction01/11/19 01:57 AM
1

Did you end up dating her/hooking up?
/r/seduction31/10/19 04:01 PM
2

There's a website called stickk.com you can use to put your commitment into a contract and to put the money on the line up front: https://www.stickk.com/
/r/seduction31/10/19 03:16 PM
-2

Are you someone who has gone on a lot of dates/dated attractive women (through cold approach) and can consistently get the kind of girl you want? If not, consider thinking twice about whether you know what an effective strategy looks like. Maybe you are someone who's getting great results. However, a lot of guys talk like they're experts even though they haven't walked the walk and give suggestions that are based on theoretical truths rather than practical experience.
/r/seduction31/10/19 03:14 PM
0

Yeah dude he's constantly with hot girls. He has so much proof he got banned from YouTube (because it wasn't politically correct). Don't get bitter, get better.
/r/seduction31/10/19 05:39 AM
2

Of course, most of his ideas are being adapted from those who came before him - that's true for anyone in any field - but that's not the same as copying something almost exactly without giving credit. Keep sharing useful ideas, just give credit where it's due.
/r/seduction31/10/19 05:00 AM
3

They're not your teachings though, they're directly taken from an old pickup video (https://championsofmen.com/rsd-tylers-6-steps-for-a-successful-night-picking-up-girls/) It's not just similar, you use the exact same wording Tyler did. It's great to share someone else's ideas if you give them credit. Calling them your teachings though? That's pathetic. Be better than that.
/r/seduction31/10/19 04:36 AM
185

Nice. Great example of the importance of humor, as soon as it doesn't feel 'heavy' and it's just fun, things go very smoothly.
/r/seduction31/10/19 01:36 AM
1

A lot of it will happen unconsciously as long as you're taking action and analyzing what happened (with field reports). I've often noticed myself holding stronger eye contact, saying a certain line, or enacting a concept without thinking about it that I had previously read about. That said, you can expedite the process by practicing specific exercises based on something you want to get better on (I.E. free association, vocal tonality, etc.)
/r/seduction11/10/19 07:11 PM
2

The only coach who I know that got exposed faking infield is Tom Torero. (and even with him, I couldn't find proof. Everyone says that there's tons of fake infield out there, but I've never seen evidence that this is actually true. Hiring actresses to get infield means you're risking getting exposed as a fake. Pretty much anyone can get girl's numbers even if they aren't very skilled. Don't see the benefits of faking footage unless it's pulls or makeouts etc.
/r/seduction11/10/19 06:42 PM
0

The recording of sex wasn't on YouTube though. And the recording approaches in public isn't much different than doing pranks. Nothing illegal about that (that I know of).
/r/seduction10/10/19 08:49 PM
1

Yeah, the stories that came out later revealed he was doing some pretty creepy stuff on a regular basis. Sounded like it was harassment to me. However, the UK YouTube channel Street Attraction didn't do anything remotely illegal and got banned from YouTube because of a BBC hit-piece. Pretty glad I don't live in the UK right now. Although it seems like the U.S. is only a few years behind in terms of having a hyper PC culture.
/r/seduction10/10/19 07:51 PM
6

James Tusk looks like a male model so they'll probably just think, "That guy's doing a really good service for men out there. I hope to meet a guy like that myself." The public perception of a guy who by society's standards should be getting hot women doing pickup is very different than someone who looks like he 'shouldn't' be able to do so.
/r/seduction10/10/19 07:48 PM
11

He's saying that the problem might not be that he's fundamentally "not good enough" he may be doing something wrong in his interactions that is the real reason he's getting rejected. For instance, maybe he's not holding eye contact. Maybe he's speaking in a way that is coming across as unconfident. Alternatively, many of the girls he's approaching may like him but he doesn't see it and doesn't even ask for the number. There's a lot of possible explanations for his results, it being something abo…
/r/seduction07/10/19 01:18 AM
3

Some do, most people are just listening to music or whatever. Having approached hundreds of women who were wearing headphones I haven't noticed ANY difference in the way they react. Never had a girl refuse to take off her headphones or seem annoyed that I was bothering her. Some didn't weren't interested of course, but the fact that she was wearing headphones wasn't a factor.
/r/seduction06/10/19 10:20 PM
1

Few women will be this obvious because it risks making them seem like a slut. Most women prefer it if the guy leads because then the responsibility is on him. I'm saying this as a guy who's been with a good amount of women, there've been very few instances where a girl proactively took off her pants so I could go down on her. That said, if you're a virgin you don't need to rush towards sex, you should just enjoy the whole experience and gradually escalate at a rate that feels natural. The real p…
/r/seduction02/10/19 03:58 AM
1

If anyone is in Phoenix Arizona, we have a local Facebook group with over 100 members: https://www.facebook.com/groups/836683966672141/
/r/seduction22/09/19 09:00 AM
1

That's how conversation works, not every thread is supposed to go on infinitely, whenever a thread loses steam you change topics. If her laptop wasn't there I would have pointed something else out or asked a question about her and associated off her answer.
/r/seduction07/09/19 03:16 PM
-3

Well stated constructive criticism that adds value to the discussion.
/r/seduction07/09/19 02:04 PM
1

If you’re someone who has learned to pedestalize women (I.E.) a nice guy, anything that seems “mean” will look cringey to you because that reinforces the idea that being nice and having completely safe conversations is a good dating strategy. And no, those aren’t the most clever teases ever, but they don’t have to be, you’re simply communicating something on an emotional level that women find attractive, if you say something with the piercing wit of Russel Brand great, but you don’t have to. I g…
/r/seduction07/09/19 02:03 PM
1

I literately gave an infield example of saying the exact line.
/r/seduction07/09/19 01:58 PM
3

The main dude is not that good looking in real life if you watch one of his YouTube videos. But he took pictures that make him look much better than he really does - that’s the best part of Tinder, the difference between a bad picture and good picture is several points on the ‘hotness scale’. Also, if you want want to get ripped, get ripped, it’s under your control. Using that as an excuse that you’re not getting laid is a rather self-defeating line of thinking.
/r/seduction07/09/19 01:56 PM
3

Wow man, that sucks. Sorry to hear that. Sounds, like the beginnings of 1984. Well, I'll keep watching :X Hopefully, a new social media platform (like the one Jordan Peterson is launching) will allow people who are in "politically incorrect" niches to have a better home.
/r/seduction07/09/19 02:34 AM
6

It's so weird that he has 60k subs yet many of his videos get 300-500 views in the first week. What's up with that?
/r/seduction07/09/19 01:18 AM
1

Great story, very inspirational - and some really useful advice, too.
/r/seduction03/09/19 03:45 PM
3

He's done that before without crediting the original creator. The videos are pretty good, but I'm not sure if there's an original idea in them. I'm skeptical as to whether he actually knows anything about game from personal experience or if he's just regurgitating other material (much of which is from people who also don't know much about game).
/r/seduction31/08/19 03:21 AM
3

I hope you enjoyed the video - finding wingmen was one of the best decisions I made: not only has it helped me get the success with women I wanted, but it also helped me make a lot of really cool friends. So, if you don't have any other guys to go out with, there's no reason not to find some wingmen. And if your city is too small to have a group, you can also find wingmen when you go out to clubs - just look for guys who are at the clubs specifically to meet women (Guys who approach or guys who …
/r/seduction25/08/19 03:19 AM
2

Global Wingman Groups (every major city): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1j...https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jGWhFvgqgLPQxyvB8DN--CiihoSqPNS-btHONa7OLRA/edit If your city isn't on the page I linked, you can also look on Facebook for a local group: https://www.facebook.com/search/top/?q=rsd%20inner%20circle&opensearch=1 (Just search RSD Inner circle [your city]) Unfortunately, those groups don't allow posting on the page, but you can still join them and message the members to find wings.…
/r/seduction25/08/19 03:18 AM
5

Tl;Dw - Tom Torero is very mild-mannered and friendly in his approaches. This is good in that it keeps the pressure low and makes it more likely that girls will want to engage with him (at least on a social level). However, he doesn't really do anything to give his interactions a man-to-woman energy, it feels very platonic. He isn't really taking many risks and he isn't making himself vulnerable. Tay Social, on the other hand is overtly sexual. And you can tell that women respond to his approach…
/r/seduction20/08/19 01:54 AM
1

Julien's vids are quite easy to find. They also exist in audio form so you can listen on your commute.
/r/seduction29/07/19 06:46 PM
17

Yeah, depending on how you do it, it can actually be an advantage. I've had girls I ended up dating say things like, "I saw that all these different girls were talking to you and I was curious about who you were." If you come across as a pickup nerd who's on some kind of serious mission, then people might notice you in a negative light. If you come across as a fun, social guy who brightens the room, people will wonder who you are and want to meet you.
/r/seduction28/07/19 12:41 AM
10

I'm always open to critical feedback, but I need you to be more specific.
/r/seduction26/07/19 04:14 AM
3

The two main mistakes I'm seeing: -You made sex feel contractual by getting her to agree to have sex instead of letting it be something that happens in the moment. This is a huge turn-off for women. -You care so much about this one girl that you haven't even slept with that you'd write a multiple page post asking for advice. This comes across as needy and chances are that neediness is leaking into the way you text and interact with this girl in person. That's also a huge turn-off. Solution: -Don…
/r/seduction22/07/19 05:08 PM
2

I don't think self-improvement has to imply something is wrong with you. There was nothing wrong with the PS3, but the PS4 still improved upon it. You don't have to improve to fix something that's wrong, you can do it to make yourself even better.
/r/seduction22/07/19 04:04 AM
12

I've never had good shoes. Not Once. Maybe I got double points for my face? Or maybe girls just really like the skinny fat look these days. Hmm.....
/r/seduction20/07/19 04:48 AM
1

It's not about thinking, it's about feeling it, imagining it, visualizing it. Feelings get transferred from person to person, not thoughts.
/r/seduction16/07/19 11:42 PM
1

Desire is transferred from person to person, just like laughter or anger or any other emotion. Now, if she is completely unattracted to you, this strategy won't make much of a difference and it's generally best to move on. However, many women will be in a grey area - they're not definitely attracted to you, but they're not definitely uninterested, either. In this case, your ability to exude sexual energy can make the difference between her seeing you as a friend and her seeing you as a potential…
/r/seduction16/07/19 10:30 PM
11

White girls like to fuck black guys partly because they think their parents won't approve of it. And also because black men tend to be more masculine than white guys. At least that's how I'd think of it.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/19 05:10 AM
23

Sounds like a charismatic guy to me. You can be both charismatic and manipulative, they aren't mutually exclusive. Although, nothing you described sounds manipulative to me, sounds more like he's inspirational.
/r/seduction13/07/19 01:14 PM
1

What steps do you think could help improve the general sense of direction for the community?
/r/seduction12/07/19 05:41 PM
3

Step 2: make excuses and wallow in self-pity. Step 3: Spread your negative thoughts on the internet for a cheap dopamine spike. Step 4: Wait for about 20 years until VR is so good that you can actually enter another body and have sex in it.
/r/seduction12/07/19 03:58 AM
1

This is awesome!
/r/seduction11/07/19 09:11 PM
1

Everyone is more delusional than they'd like to admit. Not approaching a hot girl is delusional because there's nothing to lose (in most cases) but a lot to potentially gain.
/r/seduction11/07/19 04:58 AM
1

Coffee/bar/park are all good options. The idea is something that's low cost where you can have a real conversation.
/r/seduction10/07/19 12:42 AM
1

The female brain evolved over hundreds of thousands of years to prefer men of high status(1). In prehistoric times, the children of high status men had greater social influence and better access to food and shelter than their lower status counterparts(2). So, the offspring of alpha males were more likely to survive in the harsh environment our ancestors lived in. The children of low-status men, on the other hand, were unlikely to make it very far in life. Men of high status also had superior…
/r/seduction09/07/19 02:40 PM
0

"Talking to a girl not only includes saying the right and most attracted words. " You lost me on the first sentence man. You should consider reading some books about writing (I.E. The Elements Of Style, Writing Tools, or On Writing Well).
/r/seduction07/07/19 09:45 PM
4

If that happens, then you were eventually going to get rejected anyway, better sooner than later. The longer you wait, the more invested you get and the more painful it is.
/r/seduction07/07/19 09:20 AM
2

To give credit where it's due, I do think the infield you linked is impressive and definitely worth watching,
/r/seduction06/07/19 06:22 PM
7

I agree that inability to sexualize is a huge sticking point in the community, and some of these tips are great, especially accusing her of sexualizing. However, making the verbal layer of an interaction sexual can backfire unless you know exactly how to calibrate and it has to be with a girl who won't be overwhelmed by that (especially in daygame). Honestly, I think trying to be sexual in your verbals tends to do more harm than good. Especially when you can learn to be sexual with your eye cont…
/r/seduction06/07/19 06:07 PM
3

Yeah man, I run a Facebook group to find local wingmen in Phoenix: https://www.facebook.com/groups/836683966672141/ We also do group meetings to talk about game and shoot ideas off of each other. At least 5-10 guys from the group go out every Thursday-Saturday.
/r/seduction05/07/19 03:56 AM
1

Cold approach is a powerful tool - but there is a difference between pick up and seduction. One of these systems is far more effective than the other. Girls want to meet guys, but they don't want to be pushed into something, they want to meet a guy they have to work for. So, when learning how to talk to women, consider whether you're doing pickup or seduction - because they're completely different. To be clear, these definitions are subjective, some people may identify with pickup but using a me…
/r/seduction04/07/19 09:12 PM
1

Cold approach is a powerful tool - but there is a difference between pick up and seduction. One of these systems is far more effective than the other. Girls want to meet guys, but they don't want to be pushed into something, they want to meet a guy they have to work for. So, when learning how to talk to women, consider whether you're doing pickup or seduction - because they're completely different. To be clear, these definitions are subjective, some people may identify with pickup but using a me…
/r/seduction04/07/19 02:57 AM
11

Did you or someone you know get their reputation ruined from doing day game? Or is this just conjecture? To be fair, that could happen if you did day game really aggressively and showed no empathy - but not many guys are like that. Game is only autistic if you go about it in an autistic way. As a rule-of-thumb, if a girl doesn't seem to want to talk to you, tell her to have a nice day and move on. As long as you do that, you should be fine. In an average daygame session I'll end up going on more…
/r/seduction02/07/19 10:14 AM
1

Again, you're using a metaphor to create a straw man... You're not actually arguing against what I said, and you're making the assumption that women can have sex with any man they want (drive any exotic car they want), but that's pretty far departed from the reality. Most women can get laid easily, yes, but that doesn't mean they can have any guy they want. That's a pretty bold claim to make without evidence. You're also assuming that sex is an inherently positive experience like driving a car i…
/r/seduction01/07/19 02:47 AM
1

You're suggesting that pickup has nothing to do with relationships and the two are mutually exclusive which is, of course, untrue. Many people pursue pickup to get into relationships - not just to have one-nights stands. Part of game and pickup is knowing how to keep someone interested - that should go without saying. Even if that weren't the case, women can get laid easily, yes, but pickup skills can help them create more choice: knowing how to get a guy to chase you and how and when to be bold…
/r/seduction30/06/19 11:56 PM
3

Grass is always greener on the other side. Yes, women can get laid very easily, but not necessarily with the guy they want - having to wait for guys to approach and make a move limits your options. And for women, getting laid might be easy, but keeping the guy isn't - especially if he's a high quality guy. In fact, the first thing resembling game was invented by women - back in the day, women were physically weaker and did not have state enforced equality, so they had to learn to consolidate pow…
/r/seduction30/06/19 09:32 PM
4

Tl;dr: Yes, looks matter, anyone who says otherwise is either trying to sell you something or has little personal experience with women. However, although being below-average looking is a disadvantage in some ways, it can also be an advantage. You might have to approach 3 times as many women to get a date as an average guy compared to someone who looks like a male model. But the guy who looks like a male model is prone to fall into apathy - he can easily get laid with average girls, so he doesn'…
/r/seduction30/06/19 02:03 AM
1

Are you learning pickup from Eeyore or something?
/r/seduction27/06/19 07:28 PM
1

5% tops. It's not limited to just this Subreddit though, the same is true for pretty much all pickup communities. In the words of Metallica, sad but true.
/r/seduction27/06/19 06:50 PM
1

A. I have posted infields. B. Did you actually watch the video past 2 minutes? Can't really judge something accurately based off the first 10% of it. Seeing examples of bad game and an explanation of WHY it's bad is super useful for so many reasons. Learning from mistakes is often more valuable than learning from examples of what's effective. If you've made progress in game, I'm sure you know that it's the moments where you fuck up that teach you the most valuable lessons.
/r/seduction27/06/19 01:15 PM
2

Do you disagree with the analysis for a specific logical reason, or are you just making an argument by authority fallacy? Besides, many of the best PUA's have fairly small audiences (I.E.. Austen Summers) and some who have huge audiences don't have any actual skill (I.E. Tripp Advice) - having a big following has a lot to do with marketing skill, which can trump actual pickup skill.
/r/seduction26/06/19 11:42 PM
1

Yep, you can be both a nerd and an alpha male.
/r/seduction26/06/19 10:28 PM
1

There's a presumption here that you can't be both a nerd and an 'alpha' which is inaccurate. It's not a common combination, but it definitely exists. A couple examples of 'nerd alphas': Eric Andre Jordan Peterson Richard Ayoade Quentin Tarantino Logic Nerdiness and alphaness aren't contradictory traits, being 'alpha' just means being unreactive and having a strong frame of reality. Most nerds are shy, but you don't have to be shy to be a nerd. Anyone can become very 'alpha' if they put themselve…
/r/seduction26/06/19 10:26 PM
1

Thanks man, I appreciate that a lot :)
/r/seduction24/06/19 03:18 PM
1

Thanks man. Yeah, it's not that tactics reinforce low self esteem for for all guys. You can reach a point in self-esteem where techniques no longer are a form of overcompensation, but if you're not at that point and you try to use them they'll probably backfire.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/19 03:18 PM
2

Calling it "faking high value" is a straw man argument unless you provide a sound definition of what real versus fake value is. I don't see any reason that emotions aren't by themselves a real form of value. Learning how to do things that spark emotion (I.E. eye contact, being unfiltered) is simply a way to project that type of value. It's fine to criticize, but at least have an intelligent logical argument behind what you're saying rather than just parroting ideological platitudes. You're also …
/r/TheRedPill24/06/19 03:16 PM
27

"He who says he can and he who says he can't are both usually right" - Confucius
/r/seduction23/06/19 03:59 AM
1

thanks man!
/r/seduction23/06/19 03:35 AM
11

It's a little early to make that claim unless you're a eunuch.
/r/seduction23/06/19 03:34 AM
1

Would you say the hotseat was a transformational experience? :P Yeah, I actually learned a lot about this at an RSD hotseat in 2016. Although RSD has been a bit on the decline the last couple years (in my opinion), there's no denying the instructors have great game and a lot of great insights to learn from.
/r/seduction23/06/19 03:33 AM
1

How do you know they were mocking you? Maybe they were laughing at the situation itself or maybe they were laughing at the female friend. But in general, yes, nightgame rejections are the harshest, but that's actually a good thing because it makes you more resilient and teaches you not to give a fuck.
/r/seduction22/06/19 10:35 PM
0

The biggest thing that holds guys back from getting results in game is their overarching strategy. By this I mean - what is your definition of a good day or night of game? Is it: Approaching 1 or 2 girls for 30 minutes and having deep interactions with them? Or, Approaching 15, 20, or even more girls and having short interactions with them? Truthfully, the vast majority of guys I've run into use the first strategy. They do a small number of long approaches. And this makes it incredibly unlikely …
/r/seduction22/06/19 06:08 PM
1

Nice dude, yeah meetups aren't going to get you super hot girls but they can be a general step in the right direction. What do you mean that they friendzone you? Like you ask them out but they say they see you as a friend? Yeah, that sounds like Tinder lol. Going on online dates can be helpful to get some momentum going but it's not where you're going to meet the hottest girls. The secret to gaining muscle is to count your calories every day. The reason most guys struggle with it is that they ju…
/r/seduction22/06/19 05:51 PM
2

On Facebook look up RSD inner circle - your city The groups aren't active anymore but many of the members are guys in your city who are into game. So you can message them (good idea to start with people who you've seen post a lot when you scroll through the group's main page) and basically ask who goes out a lot and find out who's interested in doing some game. It takes some effort, but definitely worth it.
/r/seduction22/06/19 05:47 PM
5

Thanks man! I actually have 4 videos ready to upload and plan on putting out content regularly starting this week.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/19 10:01 AM
2

This seems a bit melodramatic but I'm always interested in new perspectives.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/19 11:16 PM
10

You wouldn't be here if part of you didn't believe that. But there's a conflict because you've spent a lot of time and energy building a set of beliefs that have protected you from rejection (I can't just approach women and attract them, I'll just get friend-zoned, why even try?). But at the same time, those beliefs have prevented you from having the kind of dating life you want and that gets increasingly painful each year. Honestly, if I were you I would start taking small steps. You could join…
/r/seduction21/06/19 09:09 PM
7

I didn't say you can suddenly be confident just by saying so, that's a straw man argument. It will take a lot of work to become confident and to learn how to be attractive to women (how much so depends on your starting point). You're probably not going to get dates with beautiful women the first times you go and do some approaches. Just like if you're obese, you're not going to bench press 300 pounds or run a marathon. But if you believe you cannot succeed than it is guaranteed that you won't su…
/r/seduction21/06/19 08:20 PM
13

“The man who says he can and the man who says he cannot are both correct.” - Confucius
/r/seduction21/06/19 08:02 PM
16

"I have paralysis because if it was as simple as just going up to her and being friendly, I would have done it by now. But I know for a fact that all that’s going to do is get me friendzoned." How could you possibly know that you'll get friendzoned for a fact? If you've done thousands of approaches, that would make sense. But you don't really know anything until you've practiced in the real world. There are two realities: mental and physical. It's very easy to get seduced by our thoughts but oft…
/r/seduction21/06/19 07:02 PM
5

You know, when you post several times within a few hours, it looks really spammy and makes it so no one wants to read your articles. At this point, if people see an article is from daygame secrets they probably just downvote it out of instinct.
/r/seduction20/06/19 04:41 PM
2

Great post, valuable insights here. "If reading my post provoked an emotional response in you, that should tell you something. Stuff that doesn’t have a kernel of truth doesn’t bother people." This is an important idea that applies not only to video games but to anything in life. If something makes us feel a negative emotion, are response is to dismiss it. But really, there's almost always an opportunity to learn something whether that be an article that pisses you off, a new habit that stresses…
/r/TheRedPill19/06/19 01:43 PM
2

Exposed as frauds is a strong claim that needs strong evidence. i've heard people like John Anthony claim that Tyler and Julien make fake infield but I haven't seen anything resembling proof. Guys with a smaller following have an incentive to defame those who are well known so I wouldn't take any claims seriously unless they have some kind of substantive evidence.
/r/seduction18/06/19 09:39 PM
-1

In general, infield videos can get some really polarized reactions, especially if the interaction is clearly sexual (making out, pulling ,etc.). My theory is that seeing a seemingly normal guy pickup girls creates cognitive dissonance because most guys have an emotional belief that they couldn't just go out and get dates with women - any evidence to the contrary is an assault on that belief. It's easier to dismiss the guy putting out infield as creepy than it is to admit that you should be facin…
/r/seduction18/06/19 09:36 PM
2

Great video man. I like the specific examples of what getting a girl to invest looks like in practice. Good job breaking down a complex topic so that anyone can understand it.
/r/seduction18/06/19 02:41 PM
1

In the above infield compilation, I'm not doing anything fancy or using pickup techniques I'm just approaching women with positive energy and confidence. And that's all you need to do to get success. You don't need to be perfect, you don't need to be as smooth as James Bond, you just need to take action and offer value with your personality. The footage was captured over the course of 30 minutes, and of the three numbers you saw me get, two of them lead to dates. Realistically, if you're new to …
/r/seduction14/06/19 02:50 PM
1

Why do you think Based Zeus has credibility? Is it his popularity or are there any other factors?
/r/seduction14/06/19 02:06 PM
1

Yeah, it's a factor that helps. But I know guys who are 6'5 that struggle and other guys who a 5'4 that do amazing. Your height matters just like your looks in general matter but it's not worth thinking about your height because you can't change it. Worry about your height when you're doing 100 approaches a week and you're the most confident and charismatic guy you know, if you've got all that down and you're still not getting results maybe it's your height. Get the things that are under your co…
/r/seduction14/06/19 05:25 AM
3

If you use a strawman argument to make the alternative options look ridiculous, it's easier to have a dogmatic black and white belief (I.E. approaching is stupid and ruins lives).
/r/seduction14/06/19 05:15 AM
3

How could you possibly know whether a girl is worth more than an hour in bed with before you've even interacted with her? You can know whether a girl is physically attractive or not but you can't know whether there's chemistry until you talk to her. And more often than not, the girls who look intriguing aren't going to approach you first. Also, the idea that the guys in the seduction community are doing tons of approaches and spending their whole life on it is definitely inaccurate. I've ran Fac…
/r/seduction14/06/19 05:14 AM
4

To me, this seems like a rather elaborate excuse to avoid doing something uncomfortable. There's a quote by Chip and Dan Heath, "We are all loophole exploiting lawyers when it comes to our self-control." It's so much easier to find a loophole that gives us an excuse not to do something that's hard than it is to embrace the reality that the things that are hard in the short-term are also the things that make our life better in the long-term.
/r/seduction14/06/19 05:08 AM
1

Share your pics and I can give you honest feedback. Obviously, part of it is just how attractive you are by society's standards, but the quality of your pictures can make a HUGE difference. A guy who would normally be considered a 6 can be an 8 on online dating with good enough pictures and a guy who would normally be considered an 8 can be a 6 on online dating with crappy pictures. Online dating can be useful, but you're always going to have a disadvantage because most Tinder/Bumble/etc. users …
/r/seduction10/06/19 05:58 PM
1

Not enough context to say for sure, but it sounds like the chances are EXTREMELY low. Sounds like this is an issue of not being in abundance: https://www.reddit.com/r/seduction/comments/aelenz/the_definitive_guide_to_abundance_and_scarcity/
/r/seduction10/06/19 05:37 PM
1

I didn't say you're avoiding rejection, I said IF you're not getting any numbers that's a sign that you're avoiding rejection. That response wasn't soley directed towards you, it was suggestions for anyone thinking about doing college daygame. Based on your post, it sounds like the main thing holding you back is volume of practice. I mean, 50 approaches in a semester is definitely a good step in the right direction, but it's also about 20% of what you could be doing. I'd say 25 approaches would …
/r/seduction10/06/19 05:32 PM
2

Partly depends on the size of the school, if it’s like 5,000 students this would quickly become a problem, but it’s much harder to get a reputation in a school of 40,000. It also depends on whether you’re aggressive or take a more relaxed and not overtly sexual approach. Game is kind of like plastic surgery, it’s only noticeable when it’s bad. Ideally come from the frame that you’re not hitting on girls, you’re just meeting people to socialize and see what kind of connection there is (or isn’t),…
/r/seduction10/06/19 04:15 AM
0

That's true - and being honest about that is helpful. Just insulting the guy without offering anything beyond that is pointless.
/r/seduction10/06/19 12:17 AM
2

On the one hand, this is great advice and you can create a lot of opportunities with eye contact. On the other hand, you have to be careful not to let this become a rule that limits you. I.E, "She didn't hold eye contact, so I'm not going to approach." Being aware of your environment is extremely useful for getting laid - if you can tell which girls want to get hit on and which ones are giving you signals, that will be a huge advantage. However, it's usually better to just dive in whenever you t…
/r/TheRedPill10/06/19 12:16 AM
3

Here's the article: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/18/style/jordan-peterson-12-rules-for-life.html And here's Peterson's reaction to it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rf3Eub1Hvhs
/r/TheRedPill09/06/19 10:08 PM
10

Unflattering is an understatement, she intentionally misrepresented his views to assassinate his reputation. As one example, she put a great amount of effort into making it look like Jordan Peterson believes that the government should force women to marry men against their will (by cleverly misusing the term "enforced monogamy").
/r/TheRedPill09/06/19 10:08 PM
3

I'd rather be a nerd than a troglodyte.
/r/seduction09/06/19 09:43 PM
7

She doesn't want to feel like she's signing a contract to negotiate the type of interaction she'll be having with you. She wants an experience. If it feels like a date, it will be a date. If it feels like you're a platonic friend, it will be a friendly hangout. Men tend to think of dating in logical terms, but this is anti-seductive, it takes the charm out of the whole process. In general, for men, sex is a goal to be achieved, for women, sex is a byproduct of a good experience. Think less about…
/r/seduction09/06/19 09:39 PM
3

Is this helpful, constructive, or in any way adding something to the community?
/r/seduction09/06/19 09:24 PM
5

How does her being higher caliber than what you're used to make it more challenging? If anything, this girls is probably making it easier than most girls do - it's only challenging if you tell yourself she's 'out of your league' but that's an arbitrary judgement that you are creating. In my experience, hooking up with the highest caliber women (in terms of both looks and personality) has generally been easier rather than harder. But whenever i believed a particular girl was too good for me, then…
/r/seduction09/06/19 09:21 PM
0

He has no clue what he's talking about. In this video (https://youtu.be/g8DlUtISSKA) he says: "If you see someone that says, 'I know how to approach women and get women with my approach, they full of shit because if that was true that mean that they could fuck every woman in the world, but they can't. You know why they can't, because every woman in the world is not gonna be attracted to them.' He is claiming that if you say you can get dates through cold approach that you are a liar because not …
/r/seduction09/06/19 04:16 PM
1

I hope this is a parody. If so, it's pretty funny although I can imagine some people will take it seriously. If it's not a parody, well, some of these make sense. But a lot of them are purely based on ego protection, "She looks dramatic," "When she is in a group," "When she feels like too reactive." 95% of attractive women will be in groups (unless you're doing daygame) and the other things you listed are impossible to know until you approach - some girls who look bitchy are actually very nice.
/r/seduction18/05/19 10:10 PM
6

It looks extremely suspicious that almost all of the accounts commenting on this have literally only commented on this one post. Almost seems like the poster is just upvoting their own content on a bunch of alt-accounts.
/r/seduction17/05/19 09:52 PM
-1

Nothing wrong with criticism, but if you're not going to be constructive about it, why waste time and energy on something that offers no value?
/r/seduction17/05/19 09:44 PM
0

https://www.reddit.com/r/seduction/comments/aelenz/the_definitive_guide_to_abundance_and_scarcity/
/r/seduction17/05/19 05:45 PM
4

Is your mindset towards this situation reflective of a guy who has an abundance of options with women or a guy who has a scarcity of options? If the answer is scarcity, it's extremely unlikely you'll get her, and even if you do, it'll be like walking on eggshells and she'll have too much power over you. When you're in scarcity, the best option is to start getting more options - instead of getting invested in the one girl who approaches you, start approaching women and asking them out until you r…
/r/seduction17/05/19 05:44 PM
1

If you literally don't jerk off I'd go to a doctor - it could be something hormonal, it could be something psychological, but that's outside the range of something people on Reddit can help you solve.
/r/seduction12/05/19 06:18 AM
1

Do you mean that you have no sex drive whatsoever and you don't even have a desire to masturbate? Or do you mean that you experience sexual desire, but not in your real life interactions with women?
/r/seduction10/05/19 09:42 PM
1

The first four and last two are all solid imo, don't know much about Wayne Dating or John Elite, could you link a good video by them (ideally an infield breakdown)
/r/seduction10/05/19 09:39 PM
2

Haha, well there is room for him to improve his public speaking ability, but that's not really his 'brand'. I think the fact that he's intellectual and breaks things down very logically is why he is so appealing to a lot of guys. If you don't like Todd because he's too analytical, you might prefer Evolutiondaily, he's keeps things simple and posts a lot of infield footage - he's kind of the opposite of Todd in some ways.
/r/seduction10/05/19 08:07 PM
2

That's believable. However, I wouldn't be surprised if RSD did really well in self help because they do have really good public speakers and they already have a large fan base that will give them a lot of momentum. I do think the PUA community needs some new faces to step up and create revolutionary content - the only guy who's been creating amazing stuff lately is Todd but he's been posting less and recently he's been making some more watered down mainstream stuff. The niche is wide open for so…
/r/seduction10/05/19 07:57 PM
5

Instead of constantly spamming clickbait content with little substance, you'd do a lot better if you focused on making high-quality content that is actually worth people's attention.
/r/seduction26/04/19 04:59 PM
4

The most practical way to go about it is when you see an attractive woman, imagine what it would look like and feel like to have sex with her, to make out with her, etc.
/r/seduction26/04/19 04:21 PM
9

Then why do women watch significantly less porn than men while they read significantly more romance novels? (50 Shades of Grey) Because romance novels are about more than the physical act of sex, they're about falling in love with someone's personality - the thought that the man is physically attractive is part of the fantasy, but it's far from all of it. Consider reading books like, "Why Women Have Sex," by Cindy Meston and David Buss or even an evolutionary psychology textbook to get a better …
/r/seduction25/04/19 09:17 PM
2

Interesting thoughts, thanks for the response man.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/19 12:36 AM
1

Thanks man, appreciate the kind words
/r/TheRedPill18/04/19 12:34 AM
3

Good point. I'd add to this that on Tinder a woman has hundreds of guys who send her messages whereas in day game women very rarely get genuinely approached - so you're going to stand out from the crowd automatically.
/r/seduction10/04/19 05:04 PM
6

Facebook inner circle groups also have had posting disabled (which makes them virtually useless) You can still get Julien's programs - Pimp, Shift, and Tengame which is generally his best content (you can buy them and you can find them elsewhere). I also looked for his Youtube videos and it only took a few minutes to find a download.
/r/seduction10/04/19 05:00 PM
5

Why are you focused on the fact that you didn't have sex when you did get a blowjob? Was that not a fun experience? Is it only a win for you if you have 'penetrative sex'? Maybe she felt hesitant because she sensed you cared too much about 'getting the close' instead of being in the moment and fully enjoying the experience for its own sake.
/r/seduction01/04/19 12:36 AM
1

The Art Of Seduction by Robert Greene is gender neutral and it has a lot of powerful points in it. The book is very amoral though, and some of the strategies/concepts are manipulative. Still, in terms of a book that can help you understand what makes people desire you (both socially and sexually) it's the best available. In my experience, a lot of the concepts here really cut both ways. If a woman is confident, she holds strong eye contact, and she even takes the lead sexually that's extremely a…
/r/seduction20/03/19 09:05 PM
1

From what I've seen, his Youtube channel has no infield which makes me skeptical of whether he practices what he preaches (maybe I'm wrong?). If you have game, why wouldn't you show real life examples? Doing so is great for building trust with your audience and will make you stand out from the competition. To be fair, there are coaches with infield who actually suck, but if you're experienced, you can tell who has skill and who doesn't when watching their infield.
/r/seduction18/03/19 02:39 AM
3

These are really interesting points and definitely something I will think about. I always appreciate feedback that broadens my perspective and makes me question my own beliefs (even if it isn't fun to read lol)
/r/seduction12/03/19 05:16 AM
6

Great post man. I think the myth that women are emotional and men are logical needs to be talked about more. Like you said, women orient more towards their emotions and men orient towards logic - but that is one of the biggest reasons guys have trouble developing self-awareness. Men are told they are logical, we are taught to believe the thoughts that run through our mind. But in reality, many of our thoughts are actually a reaction to emotions we're experiencing. So, like you said men don't und…
/r/seduction10/03/19 11:17 PM
1

You know a date's going well when they're crying in public!
/r/seduction07/03/19 02:15 AM
2

95% of the community doesn't go out at all. About 4% go out once or twice a month if not less. And 1% goes out several times a week. These numbers are estimates, but they're not completely made up. In my city our "pua lair" has 400 active members on Facebook and only about 20 of those members go out at all. Of those 20 that go out, only about 5 go out at least twice a week consistently.
/r/seduction04/03/19 04:24 PM
1

Last time I did daygame I did 6 approaches, got 4 numbers, and 2 of those numbers turned into dates (one of which was a solid 9 by my standards). A 1% success rate would be terrible. 3% is awful too. I'd say at a beginner level you can realistically get 5%-10% of your approaches to lead to dates. As you get more experienced it'll never get close to 100% but it will steadily increase over time. Personally, my average outcome for a night out is to pull an 8-8.5 and get a handful of numbers. I do 2…
/r/seduction04/03/19 04:21 PM
0

I would avoid anyone who doesn't upload infield videos - if they have good game, they would demonstrate it with infield footage. Also, if you watch their infield and you think, "This seems cringey." Trust your instinct, if it seems like the girl isn't into the guy, she probably isn't. Getting a number doesn't necessarily mean anything. And some PUA's fake infield. Look for channels with infield who's style of interacting with women resonates with you.
/r/seduction27/02/19 03:32 PM
1

I didn’t say you have to give scientific proof I said give a scientific or logical argument - either or. Without either a logical or a scientific argument you’re making an emotional argument which is a waste of everyones time. You haven’t actually given any evidence to support your claim that your voice is irrelevant to attracting women. You’ve simply used straw man arguments to take my points out of context and said generic philosophical statements without backing them up. It’s cool to have you…
/r/seduction25/02/19 08:37 PM
3

I never said voice was the only thing that matters or that you have to have a good voice to get a girlfriend - that’s a misinterpretation of the article. Im only claiming that voice is a factor that can increase or decrease your overall attractiveness: just like eye contact and your verbal game. You’re making some pretty bold claims (that you can’t change your voice and you can’t attract women with your voice). Yet, I changed my voice from mid-baritone to deep bass using the vocular app. Seems l…
/r/seduction25/02/19 06:42 AM
1

There’s a nuance to self-deprecation that most people misunderstand. Counterintuitively, disqualifying yourself is actually showing that you have higher value than the person you’re interacting with - it implies you don’t care whether they approve of you or think you’re cool. Qualifying yourself, on the other hand, implies lower value because it insinuates that you care about whether the other person approves of you. Someone who’s confident he’s good in bed doesn’t need to brag about it, Of cour…
/r/TheRedPill25/02/19 05:16 AM
2

Most of the same principles apply for women. The only important difference is that a deeper voice isn't necessarily more attractive. I'd recommend listening to famous women who's voices you consider sexy and to compare their voices to your own and see what adjustments you could make.
/r/seduction24/02/19 02:42 AM
1

Yeah man, I do online coaching as well as in-person immersions. Right now, I'm offering a free initial call to anyone who requests it: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdyb3PxkUXTOn1gz3W2YJmH0UNrChDRLej18Zem7VYTynI_0w/viewform?usp=sf_link
/r/seduction23/02/19 10:03 PM
-5

Sounds like a totally scientific and not at all emotional response. If you read the end of the article, I specifically say that what you say is mostly useful for increasing attraction that's already their rather thank sparking it. I'd love to see any scientific literature you know about that says testosterone levels are the sole cause of sexual attraction. Care to share links?
/r/TheRedPill23/02/19 05:04 PM
-2

Here's the Russel Brand interviews mentioned in the article: https://youtu.be/G2Ld92qNFoM
/r/TheRedPill23/02/19 04:56 PM
1

Try during the day - it's completely different and you'll get more positive responses. Night game is great for pulling girls the same night, but you are going to get a good amount of instant rejections, that's just the name of the game. Sounds like you're thinking about all the reasons it won't/can't work for you in your city - if go into this with the mentality that you're doomed to fail, then you're going to fail - girls can sense your negative assumptions, they leak off of a guy's personality…
/r/seduction23/02/19 03:12 AM
2

That's a good number of approaches. Curious what you mean by you haven't gone far enough to ask that? To really know whether girls are attracted to you, you need a lot of date. If you approach 100 girls, ask them each to hang out for coffee, and not one of them meets up with you, then you know something is holding you back. But if you haven't asked any girls on actual dates, you can't really know how attractive you are to women. Girls will almost never make the first move on a guy, so you can't …
/r/seduction23/02/19 03:05 AM
2

How many girls have you approached and asked to hang out on a date in the last month?
/r/seduction23/02/19 02:55 AM
4

PS: If you want your channel to grow, make some infield. Since you have no social-proof, no one is going to believe you're an expert until you have some real evidence - if your game is good on camera, people will start to pay attention.
/r/seduction05/02/19 04:15 PM
1

How many times you gonna post this bro
/r/seduction05/02/19 04:14 PM
3

The idea that men only care about looks is exaggerated. We think that we only go for looks, but I've seen plenty of average to below-average looking girls date guys who are in the 8/9/10 range. We identify with the idea that we should be getting hot girls, but when push comes to shove, most guys end up with someone out of convenience rather than who a girl who fits the archetype they see themselves as wanting. Obviously, looks matter for both sexes, probably more for men than for women. But ulti…
/r/seduction05/02/19 04:12 PM
0

Obvious alt account is obvious lol
/r/seduction05/02/19 01:25 AM
1

David has no game whatsoever - he knows how to get numbers that flake, that’s it. Watch his infield closely, the girls are uncomfortable and uninterested in almost all of them. Dave Perrotta has mediocre game but better than David. DailyDropOut has great game but he doesn’t teach it, you won’t learn much from watching pranks. Charisma on command actually has solid game but he doesn’t really teach it anymore. Models has some great mindset stuff but it has almost no practical advice that will dire…
/r/seduction05/02/19 01:24 AM
1

Also, showing your Tinder profile pictures as examples of the initial 5 points you made would be awesome.
/r/seduction20/01/19 11:13 PM
0

Either way, you got it from someone and didn't give them credit, that's my main concern. A post like this about Tinder would be a lot more compelling if you screenshotted examples of how girls respond to your profile/openers. My intuition says that your opener, "Now, what on earth can a man say to a woman who’s written absolutely nothing about herself in her bio?" is pretty weak. It just doesn't seem to give the girl a reason to respond, you're basically saying you can't think of anything intere…
/r/seduction20/01/19 11:11 PM
1

I'm curious, which programs would say have been the most useful for you?
/r/seduction20/01/19 10:19 PM
3

The tips 1-5 are all great. The bio on the other hand... sounds like it's trying too hard to be cool rather than showing playfulness and wit. You pretty much copy pasted the sample opener RSD Jeffy gives on his online course, "Execute The Program", I think the only thing you changed was adding the word "cheerio". You also didn't give him credit, not classy. Some good advice in here, but it does seem like you're mostly parroting stuff you learned from Jeffy (the pics you suggest are in line with …
/r/seduction20/01/19 10:12 PM
1

What environments are more predicable and which are least predictable? Personally, I found daygame on my college campus to be super easy, but I already had a good amount of experience doing nightgame beforehand.
/r/seduction18/01/19 01:09 AM
1

I've known plenty of unattractive guys who are confident and socially outgoing. It's rare for the worse looking guys to be confident because the societal narrative says they shouldn't be and people to generally have less positive assumptions about them - but it's definitely not impossible.
/r/seduction17/01/19 10:36 PM
5

But you can't get good unless you go through the cringey phase, bit of a paradox there.
/r/seduction17/01/19 10:34 PM
1

What research, exactly?
/r/seduction17/01/19 08:24 PM
3

Great advice all around. Good stuff man.
/r/seduction17/01/19 07:59 PM
2

Yeah; they’re spreading their self-defeating beliefs like a disease. It’s a terrible thing. The Dunning-Kruger effect is strong in the pickup community.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/19 04:49 PM
4

I'm seeing an explanation of what causes approach anxiety, not sure where the "how to cheat approach anxiety" party comes in?
/r/seduction15/01/19 03:57 PM
7

Do both, you're only limitation here is your beliefs. Do you think no one in the past has managed to have as busy a schedule as you while also having a good dating life? Of course they have, you just have to make it a priority. The average American consumes 10 hours of digital media per day. Even if you only do a third of that if you cut that from your life you'd have plenty of time to approach women on campus. I used to take 19 credits while also working 40 hours a week and I still managed to g…
/r/seduction15/01/19 02:07 AM
3

Immersion tends to get better results than bootcamps from what I've seen. 30 days of gaming every single day with a group of highly motivated guys can be really transformative. Most former bootcamps students I've met did really well during the bootcamp but didn't know how to maintain the momentum and basically fell off the wagon.
/r/seduction15/01/19 12:56 AM
5

Doing that would certainly get you more results than 95% of guys in the community.
/r/seduction15/01/19 12:54 AM
4

The key words being "anyone who has done a decent amount of approaching," a very small percentage of guys who read about game actually do it. It's much easier to say it's impossible than to put your ego on the line by approaching women.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/19 05:34 PM
12

What dating apps were you using in 1996?
/r/TheRedPill12/01/19 06:41 AM
46

Cold approach just means you don’t know her beforehand, if your game is good yeah she’ll enjoy talking to you and be more attracted. Not sure if trolling lol
/r/TheRedPill12/01/19 04:34 AM
11

That’s true, but millionaires are generally happier than those in poverty. Abundance causes problems too, but better problems than scarcity.
/r/seduction10/01/19 07:32 PM
1

Yeah man, it’s all an upward spiral. Approaching improves your self-esteem, assertiveness, and willpower. Lifting has similar effects as does working on your financial life, improving any one of the major areas of your life helps you improve the others. However, you still have to take measurable action in each of the areas or you run the risk of falling into a cycle of procrastination. For most guys, I think game is the easiest area to put off because it causes the most anxiety, going to the gym…
/r/seduction10/01/19 02:48 PM
3

Agreed
/r/seduction10/01/19 04:43 AM
0

I can see why Jordan Peterson may be regarded as sexist, but what has he said that's racist? I can't think of anything - and I didn't see a single example on the page you linked. Do you have any specific evidence to support that claim?
/r/seduction10/01/19 04:31 AM
25

Yeah but at the same time just improving your life isn't going to get rid of approach anxiety or make girls start coming to you. You still have to take action and learn what you're doing poorly and how you can do it better. Sure, you should always improve your life - financially, emotionally, intellectually, etc. But don't use that as an excuse to not meet women (there are some exceptions: if your life is really fucked up right now it may be best to put off game, but most people aren't in this c…
/r/seduction10/01/19 02:34 AM
1

Of course. Most of the ones who fake it are really cringey, I don’t think it’s hard to tell. Infield isn’t scientific proof someone has game but it’s evidence, and it’s suspicious if a dating coach doesn’t post it.
/r/seduction09/01/19 10:16 PM
1

Before Sunrise
/r/seduction09/01/19 09:26 PM
2

It was, I just don’t think it was likely to have worked. I’ve done similar, it only worked once out of 20 times, but I’m not a gallant Spanish artist hitting on travelers, so maybe it would work. Either way, probably not something most people should do in their own interactions.
/r/seduction09/01/19 09:14 PM
-1

Yeah, amazing movie all over. I thought the part where he suggested that he and the two women would "drink wine and make love" was a bit exaggerated - but other than that, a very insightful and interesting movie. Good movie to watch on a date, too.
/r/seduction09/01/19 09:05 PM
11

Interesting, I'll probably check it out. Coincidentally, Ethan Hawke is also in one of the more famous "pickup movies," before sunrise. In that movie he picks up a girl on a train and they fall in love. Guess he has a thing for picking up chicks who are in transit.
/r/seduction09/01/19 09:04 PM
7

That's definitely an inspirational study. That sounds about right, I've experimented with approaching extremely directly and asking for a date and it worked a good amount of the time - but there was a high flake rate. Still, the success rate is definitely high enough to warrant doing it, it's not 0% or 1% like many guys assume it will be before actually trying it themselves.
/r/seduction09/01/19 07:08 PM
2

Personally, I won't trust anyone who's unwilling to post infield. It's not hard to make infield videos, and if your game is good it would only make your audience trust you more - why wouldn't you do it?
/r/seduction09/01/19 05:41 PM
18

Great answer
/r/seduction09/01/19 04:08 AM
4

By handful I mean five or six. Well, my definition for an 8 might not be the same as yours - to me an 8 is a girl who most people would say is ‘hot’ but she probably isn’t a high end cocktail waitress or a model. On my scale an 8 is in the top 10-15 percent of women you’ll see in a club, a 7 is cute but your friends won’t be jealous. I also live in Phoenix and of the major cities I’ve been to, Scottsdale has the highest ratio of hot women because there are no exclusive clubs (unlike say LA or Ne…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/19 10:54 PM
4

Hard to put the pussy on a pedestal when a girl is on all fours on your bed. That’s what measuring your goals and progress helps you do.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/19 10:07 PM
1

I do track everything else on a separate spreadsheet: writing, lifting, diet, meditation all that stuff - I just keep the game spreadsheet on its own page. Definitely a good idea to do both though
/r/TheRedPill04/01/19 07:48 PM
15

One of my biggest motivations is that by practicing this shit in real life I get new ideas for content. I wouldn't recommend getting involved in anything long-term until you've got the skillset down and you are confident that you can get high-quality girls whenever you want. I would set a rule for myself to wait to get into a relationship for at least 6-months or a year if I were still in the beginner or intermediate phase.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/19 05:35 PM
10

What is lastlucker about it and what would you add to make it better?
/r/TheRedPill04/01/19 05:14 PM
14

I've pulled roughly 100 girls from game - mostly 8s, a handful of 9s and 10s, a good number of 7s when I was new. I only bang one girl on the regular (open relationship) but I also go out regular and I'd say I do pretty well.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/19 05:13 PM
2

A phone number doesn't necessarily lead to anything - but if you don't get the number, then nothing's going to happen. So it's a step you need to be taking and I know a lot of guys who go out but they just never go for the close. Now, I agree with your overaching point, that's why I recommend tracking other aspects of your game as well - numbers shouldn't be the only metric, but it's still an important metric.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/19 05:11 PM
4

Stealing other people's programs to sell them for your own profit is a horrible thing to do. Giving them away for free is bad enough, but actually selling them? Come on man.
/r/seduction03/01/19 11:08 PM
1

How exactly do you try to escalate? Also, how often would you estimate you approach a girl and attempt to take the interaction in a sexual direction?
/r/seduction01/01/19 07:21 PM
2

This is cool but what does it have to do with the title?
/r/seduction24/12/18 03:25 AM
2

I've pulled extremely hot girls with that line, so it's worked for me just fine. It's not my go to approach because there are disadvantages to being direct, but it definitely can work. I'm not sure I understand your metaphor - I don't think women are dressing to get a compliment, but to actually be more attractive and have a better chance at getting the attention of high status/attractive men. There's a specific goal that looking sexy can help you accomplish, pretending to be interested in sport…
/r/seduction24/12/18 02:29 AM
2

Some good feedback here. What makes you think women don't care if men think they look good? They might not care if lame guys think they look good, but I'd imagine women do want to catch the attention of attractive guys - why wouldn't they? I agree with your criticism of his second and third line, but the first line can be good in certain contexts. In a nightclub, women do get approached directly quite often, so saying you think she's cute is pretty generic. However, if you're approaching women i…
/r/seduction24/12/18 01:50 AM
1

This is not rejection therapy. Rejection Therapy is creating situations specifically to get rejected. There are actually a lot of women who would immediately give you their number after you straight up ask for it so that's not really a good tactic. If you're trying to get rejected on purpose you would be saying and asking for things with very low likelihood of getting an yes response. Read OP's post - he defines purposefully getting rejected as telling a girl she's cute and asking for her number…
/r/seduction20/12/18 07:21 PM
1

Personally, my attempts at using flooding usually backfired. Once I was having a panic attack and I thought, "Ok, I should try to intentionally make the anxiety worse to prove I'm not actually having a heart attack." So, I started lifting weights mid panic attack, the anxiety got worse but I trusted it would eventually subside because I would disprove it at some point. Well, the anxiety got so intense that I ended up in the emergency room because I was certain I was dying. Not to say that floodi…
/r/seduction20/12/18 02:38 PM
2

He's a great example, especially because his voice sounded terrible when he started Youtube and has improved over time.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/18 05:52 AM
8

Looks interesting - only available for iphone though. If you have an android Vocular is the only alternative I'm aware of.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/18 11:31 PM
3

If you're in the appropriate age-range university campuses are the best option in most cities. Other than that most cities have a decently busy mall, or a busy street in the downtown area that can work. It really depends on the city. But generally, if you're in the 18-25 ish range, campus daygame is your best option and if you're older, nightclubs/bars are the best option.
/r/seduction17/12/18 02:36 PM
7

Clubs or daygame, yeah.
/r/seduction17/12/18 04:06 AM
10

I used to live in a city with 500,000 people - there was only one really good venue for nightgame and for daygame so I pretty much just went to those two places exclusively. Now I live in a much larger city so I vary it up more. The only real difference is between nightgame and daygame - nightgame is better for getting same night lays (at least in my experience) and daygame is easier to do without a wing plus you don't have to deal with group dynamics (because you can approach girls who aren't w…
/r/seduction17/12/18 03:47 AM
16

Summary: Oneitis is an unhealthy attachment to a girl who you do not have a sexual relationship with. You have oneitis if you're thinking about a girl who you're interested in on a regular basis - but you aren't actively dating her. If you've known a girl for more than a few days but she doesn't know you are attracted to her - it's probably oneitis. Oneitis is a disease that causes us to waste months (sometimes even years) of our time and emotions on a girl who we can never have. Oneitis is an i…
/r/seduction13/12/18 08:32 PM
5

Maybe if you practice the exercise in the article you'll be able to think of a competent insult.
/r/TheRedPill13/12/18 04:14 PM
2

You don't have to be a consumer of social media to get the advantages. I'm very active on Snapchat, but I don't watch other people's stories - I just post my own. The benefits are easily worth the 5 minutes a day it takes to create content. You don't need social media to get laid, but you also don't need a car to get across town - you could just bike. But who bikes when they own a car? Time and energy are both important resources and using social media for game saves a lot of both. Honestly, I t…
/r/seduction13/12/18 04:19 AM
9

If killing mastodons gets you laid, keep at it.
/r/TheRedPill12/12/18 10:56 PM
6

Fair point. What I really meant to get across is that we hold better conversations with people we are comfortable with, but we get stifled when interacting with attractive women. I'll replace the word good with decent as that would be more accurate.
/r/TheRedPill12/12/18 08:00 PM
2

This, 100%
/r/seduction11/12/18 07:47 PM
2

Maybe they were flirting with you? It sounds like you haven't gone out and cold approached girls recently. Why do I say that? Because the less action you take, the more you overthink things and fantasize and get stuck on self-victimization loops. Based on this, you're being completely run by your ego right now. It's up to you if you want to do something to change that.
/r/seduction08/12/18 11:07 PM
5

you're doing that while also approaching right?
/r/seduction08/12/18 08:00 PM
8

If you want to give constructive criticism or add to the discussion in some way I'm all ears.
/r/seduction07/12/18 08:04 PM
2

You can tease by free association, that's the whole point. Using the same canned teases is less flexible and more robotic. You can tease anyone and make them laugh if you're playful, whether or not the girl is hot is irrelevant - it just might have more of an impact on a hotter girl because she's used to being put on a pedestal.
/r/seduction07/12/18 08:04 PM
1

I definitely do not think taco bell is as gross as Amy Schumer, they just both happen to associate with the same word - the order of magnitude is completely different ;)
/r/seduction07/12/18 08:01 PM
2

Thanks for the feedback. I agree posture is not my biggest strength.
/r/TheRedPill07/12/18 03:46 AM
10

Yeah, it takes practice to get it right. But it's better to practice and occasionally offend a girl (she'll remember it for 30 seconds) than it is to never practice getting out of your comfort zone and having conversations that go nowhere because there's some mistakes. Your teases don't have to be perfect, you just don't want to hit on something a girl is really insecure about. For example, if you met an Ashley who looked like she was really poor, you probably wouldn't use that line I mentioned.…
/r/seduction06/12/18 11:04 PM
14

If you're thinking, "Didn't I just see this article?" Well, I posted it with the wrong title LOL, total mistake. To change the title you gotta delete the post, so here we are.
/r/seduction06/12/18 06:44 PM
3

Lol thanks, I come up with stuff like that because I spend a couple minutes doing free-association exercises in my free time.
/r/TheRedPill06/12/18 06:37 PM
8

Lol, it only seems like a fantasy if you don't actually go out and approach regularly. I'm not suggesting anyone uses that line, I'm just pointing out that even off the wall, offensive lines can work if they're coming from the right place.
/r/TheRedPill06/12/18 04:19 PM
8

Actually, that's not entirely true. Memories are very much tied into emotions, the stronger the emotion the more easily we can remember something. If you think about the best date you ever want on, can you really remember what was said, or do you remember the experience of what happened?
/r/TheRedPill06/12/18 04:18 PM
13

I've had the same thing happen. It's because I thought, "I really like this girl, I should treat her with more respect and be gentlemanly." And then, as a result, I stopped doing anything remotely charming or sexual. LOL
/r/TheRedPill06/12/18 03:38 PM
38

The tease doesn't have to be clever to work, it just has to be coming from the right place. It's actually better that it doesn't have to be original, because if it did, then teasing would be a chore . It's about the vibe, not the content. Here's an example of me teasing a girl and every time I do she busts out in laughter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzMx5TBiY6E I wasn't saying clever or original, I was just being playfully provocative - teasing isn't so much about wittiness as it is about i…
/r/TheRedPill06/12/18 03:37 PM
40

That's a great point. We learn to stop teasing through social conditioning (gotta stay in line at school/work. Then, we forget that teasing is natural and we actually resist learning it by making the excuse (that's not a natural part of my personality, I don't want to be fake).
/r/TheRedPill06/12/18 03:33 PM
1

I wouldn't consider messaging making a move, making a move is like inviting someone to your place or leaning in for a kiss. Also, the reason women are more successful when they message first is because there are more men on dating sites which means women inherently have more social value and thus get a higher rate of returns. Plus, in general men will fuck any woman they can, whereas women have higher standards for who they'll sleep with. That's why gay men have an extremely high average number …
/r/seduction06/12/18 04:05 AM
1

If she calls you out on being a creep than she has self-esteem issues that she's projecting on you. Although, out of thousands of daygame approaches I've never had a girl call me creepy (it's happened a couple times at nigh though) Stop focusing on the bad things that could happen and focus on the good things that could happen.
/r/seduction06/12/18 01:59 AM
0

Yeah, they're known as women.
/r/seduction06/12/18 01:17 AM
2

I mean, just get a blowjob and close your eyes and imagine it's your favorite actress.
/r/seduction05/12/18 01:22 AM
3

3 is a lot more than most guys. I don't think anyone's going to say you need to be doing more than that lol Sounds like you're doing well - I wasn't referring to you specifically, just the average person.
/r/seduction05/12/18 01:21 AM
1

lower your standards, raise your results LOL
/r/seduction05/12/18 12:52 AM
3

The average american watches over 4 hours of TV a day. I'd happily replace that time with sex. Just depends on your priorities. Do you want actual experiences or digital simulations of experiences?
/r/seduction05/12/18 12:50 AM
4

Jeffy from RSD is probably about a 6/10 on a looks scale in real life, but on his pictures he looks like a solid 8. The difference between an average picture and a great picture is pretty substantial. If you were in the Facebook group (playing with fire) many of the group admins had photos that made them look like male models, but if you looked through their other pictures, they were barely above average. That said, the economics are generally working against you on Tinder. Plus, the girl who lo…
/r/seduction05/12/18 12:49 AM
2

Based on the story, you're getting about as obvious of signs that a girl will give you that she's into you. Just shoot your shot, stop wasting time and go for it. Either she'll be into or it or she'll reject you which will save you time.
/r/seduction04/12/18 11:12 PM
5

Tl;DW - Women will rarely tell you they like you, instead they show it with subtle behavioral cues. 1.She holds strong eye contact. 2.She fills in conversational gaps by asking questions (as opposed to forcing you to do it or coming up with an excuse to leave). 3.She gives you a 'green light' when you touch her (meaning she touches you back or leans in towards you). 4.Laughter: Sometimes a girl will laugh because you're funny which doesn't necessarily imply sexual attraction. But if she's laughi…
/r/seduction04/12/18 03:57 PM
1

Whether or not a respond is defensive/ad-hominem does not indicate whether the previous argument was accurate - that is in itself a fallacy. I do think you have a good point that infield can create unrealistic expectations of what should happen when you do game. I also think that's why it's important to include rejections. This video does include rejections - and I specifically chose 2 PUA's one who isn't very experienced - what he did in the video is very easily replicable. I don't disagree wit…
/r/seduction03/12/18 04:26 PM
1

I totally agree with this and don't see how it contradicts anything I've said?
/r/seduction03/12/18 08:57 AM
1

Did some infield video break your heart? Lol, why so passive aggressive, "If these vids that helped people thats good. Wanted to add that people come here for actual help not some ideal fantasy." Okay dude. Infield videos are by definition a more real representation of what game looks like than the normal theory-based articles and videos. These kind of videos will only make you feel like shit if you're watching through the lens of ego - "Oh, I could never do that." Try watching through the lens …
/r/seduction03/12/18 07:31 AM
0

Also, if anyone has recommendations for who I should include in episode 2 - post your suggestions in the comment section!
/r/seduction03/12/18 03:09 AM
0

We've reached a point in the seduction community where there are dozens of popular coaches to choose from. There's so much content on Youtube that it can be hard to determine who is worth watching. This series is designed to help the community get an idea of how good the different pickup teachers are from the perspective of someone who's been practicing game for over 6 years. You'll also learn a lot about game watching the video - I breakdown the infield clips explaining why what they're doing i…
/r/seduction03/12/18 03:08 AM
1

Also, if anyone has recommendations for who I should include in episode 2 - post your suggestions in the comment section!
/r/seduction03/12/18 01:14 AM
1

We've reached a point in the seduction community where there are dozens of popular coaches to choose from. There's so much content on Youtube that it can be hard to determine who is worth watching. This series is designed to help the community get an idea of how good the different pickup teachers are from the perspective of someone who's been practicing game for over 6 years. You'll also learn a lot about game watching the video - I breakdown the infield clips explaining why what they're doing i…
/r/seduction03/12/18 01:14 AM
2

Great content man, inspirational!
/r/seduction02/12/18 10:08 PM
1

Awesome man, if you ever have any questions feel free to ask me. You can reach me here, on Youtube, or on Snapchat (Averyghayden) - I'm always happy to help.
/r/seduction02/12/18 09:28 AM
1

Of course he does - can't just ask a random guy to film haha. Do you live in a decent-sized city? If you do, I can show you how to find wingmen.
/r/seduction02/12/18 09:26 AM
2

Scarcity basically means that when something is rare we give it more value. Like, if you lived in a small village with no nearby water sources, water would be like gold. But, in a modern city, water isn't something we even think about much because it's so abundant. The same thing applies with dating, if you put all your time and energy into getting one particular girl, but you're not interacting with other women (and you don't have reason to believe you could date other women), then you'll feel …
/r/seduction01/12/18 09:28 PM
1

The main thing you should be doing is approaching other women because it sounds like you're in scarcity. You're invested way too much in this one girl right now. But if you started meeting other women you'd care less about any one girl and be more likely to succeed with women in general. I made a two-part video series about how to get out of scarcity and into abundance that you might want to check out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-nqWHG0Q_A
/r/seduction30/11/18 11:49 PM
1

I do think your content has been getting better overall btw. Still want to see infield though.
/r/seduction30/11/18 08:16 PM
1

Because verbally saying yes requires more investment than just not refusing. You're asking her to say an entire sentence confirming that she wants to have sex with you - which gives her a window of opportunity to say, "Actually I'm not ready for this." It's a sticky situation all around because it's hard to tell whether a woman is really playing hard to get or if part of her actually doesn't want to have sex. But I'd rather play it safe than sorry for the sake of the girl, I want her to be able …
/r/seduction30/11/18 08:16 PM
2

Glad you liked it man!
/r/seduction30/11/18 07:26 PM
1

lol!
/r/seduction30/11/18 09:48 AM
1

Awesome, thanks for the comment :)
/r/seduction30/11/18 09:32 AM
1

Well, first thing I noticed is that you're saying you "can't do it," telling yourself that is just reinforcing the idea that it's impossible and out of your control. But you can do it, it's just challenging - that's a much better frame to take imo. If you're sure she likes you, why not invite her to something casual like darts or bowling with a group of friends, something like that? When you interact with her out of work you can be a bit more flirtatious and get an idea whether it's "on", and if…
/r/seduction30/11/18 09:32 AM
1

thanks man!
/r/seduction30/11/18 09:30 AM
1

Maybe don't do it on a door that girls will see.
/r/seduction30/11/18 09:30 AM
2

Thanks man, I appreciate it.
/r/seduction30/11/18 09:29 AM
3

Overall really good content man. One thing that's concerning to me though. You said that if she says "No, no, no, stop, in a flirty voice you can probably keep going on because she's probably teasing you." Sometimes that is a form of flirtation/teasing - but sometimes women are just uncomfortable saying no in an assertive way in sexual situations because there's a lot of pressure and vulnerability and strong emotions involved. Personally, if I hear a no - even if it sounds flirtatious - I make s…
/r/seduction30/11/18 06:23 AM
2

Well said
/r/seduction30/11/18 04:35 AM
6

I actually expected that this post would get a more lukewarm reception than most of my articles on reddit (largely because it's too long). But I posted it anyway because I think the people that actually read through the whole thing will get a lot of value from it. Also, your attempt at self-promotion is pretty weak. What you want to do is add value in some way - like make an insightful comment about the topic of this post - and then maybe you could link an article on your blog that is relevant t…
/r/seduction29/11/18 03:01 PM
5

Try to be constructive instead of judgmental with your criticism. You're framing this as if something must be wrong with her, but you really don't know the whole story so you shouldn't make negative assumptions.
/r/seduction29/11/18 04:01 AM
6

This is a solid post. It does read a lot like marketing copy though. I felt like I was being primed to buy something.
/r/seduction29/11/18 02:54 AM
1

Good infield man. I'm shocked how solid infield videos like this get downvoted - that's some of the most high value content on the sub. Keep killing it man. I really like when you show the dates afterwards because there's a huge difference between getting a number for a youtube clip and actually going on a date with the girl.
/r/seduction29/11/18 02:17 AM
6

Awesome man. Just keep doing approaches like that on a daily basis and you'll get tons of dates in no time.
/r/seduction28/11/18 08:59 PM
3

I talk about deep topics with girls all the time - almost the kind of things you would talk about with her therapist. However, I wouldn't open with this kind of thing - it's asking for a lot off the open. Personally, I break the ice with something lighthearted and then move into the more vulnerable stuff after we've established a good connection.
/r/seduction28/11/18 08:09 PM
2

Thanks for the feedback man. I agree with your points. The main reason I'm a bit reactive and not using pauses as much as I could is just that I'm not warmed up - this was my second approach. It's also partly because the pressure of being filmed. Being unreactive comes naturally when you're in a good state, you can't really try to be unreactive, you just do approaches and get out of your comfort zone, and then you'll get into an unreactive state. If you get footage, you can forward it to me and …
/r/seduction28/11/18 04:58 PM
1

Interesting ideas man, thanks for sharing. Maybe I'll get some infield with a focus on trying to get the girls to qualify and see what happens.
/r/seduction28/11/18 04:50 PM
2

Tl;Dr - If you go out and approach women regularly, you will get substantially better with women over time. Unfortunately, most guys in the seduction community don't go out regularly. One of the major reasons for this is the idea of going out and approaching women takes a lot of effort (especially at first), so it's difficult to make it a habitual part of our life. The simple solution to this is to start with an extremely small goal that anyone can do - this makes going out less stressful, and t…
/r/seduction28/11/18 04:37 PM
2

Agreed, the system is a great program and it has an 8 week action plan that is very well designed. Todd clearly has a lot of passion for teaching and a lot of experience. To be honest, Todd's style of game doesn't resonate with me, but despite that I still think his program is the best on the market right now. In terms of someone who's teaching very practical, actionable advice that works - he's the best well known dating coach out there.
/r/seduction28/11/18 09:00 AM
6

then don't use kino until you're in a private location with her (her house, your house, or a hotel)
/r/TheRedPill28/11/18 01:42 AM
2

My biggest mistake in my opinion was actually something very subtle - lack of sexual intent. Now, I don't mean saying sexual things but just overall there wasn't much sexual tension in the eye contact and the way I was interacting with her. And having that intent can really make the difference between a girl thinking you were a fun guy to talk to and a guy who swept her off her feet.
/r/seduction27/11/18 06:26 AM
1

I could upload both versions - it doesn't take much extra work to put up the raw footage. That way if people wanted to watch both back to back they could, or if they prefer one way or the other, they'd have both options. I'll make sure to mention the book :)
/r/seduction27/11/18 06:22 AM
1

I always appreciate constructive criticism. I partially agree with your first point, but it has a lot to do with self-perception. If your internal frame is that you have as high or higher value than the girl, then it's fine to apologize, it's just being polite. But if you believe you have lower value than her, than apologizing will come across as needy. I disagree with the second point, at least in my experience, there's not much reason to break the touch barrier unless you're going for the pull…
/r/seduction27/11/18 05:54 AM
1

Thanks man, I really appreciate it. Yeah, I'm planning on posting a lot more - I've got 4 infield vids on my hard drive waiting to be edited. Do you think I should keep uploading uncut footage, or should I just upload it with a breakdown explaining why I'm doing what I'm doing and why it's working (or not working). The book is at about 150 pages. The first draft is about half done. At the rate I'm going it'll be professionally edited and published in about a month. Thanks for asking :)
/r/seduction27/11/18 05:00 AM
3

Hope you guys enjoy the clip. If you have any questions about the interaction I'd be happy to answer. I'll also be posting an actual breakdown of this footage in the near future that explains why I'm saying what I'm saying and exactly why she's reacting so positively.
/r/seduction26/11/18 07:43 PM
1

Thanks for the compliment man. Most guys don't even go out once a week - so going out twice would be a huge step in the right direction. However, I disagree that going out more than twice a week is unrealistic for some people. If you really want to get this shit handled, the time is there. Personally, I went out about 4 times a week when I had a full-time job plus took full time classes, while going to the gym every day etc. I just gave up Youtube, Facebook, Netflix, Video Games - all the time s…
/r/seduction26/11/18 09:34 AM
1

Thanks man! Well, the article ended up being over 8,000 words (20+ pages) so I decided to turn it into a free video course that I'll be giving away on Youtube. It's still a few weeks from being done, but I'll be posting a link to the course on a future video - you can check out the channel, here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IBvHN-r9C4
/r/seduction26/11/18 09:28 AM
2

Do you give any credit to the source material? This is straight from Mark Manson's book models, with a few words changed here and there. The irony here is that the book's subtitle is, "Attract Women Through Honesty," yet the whole video is based on the lie that it's your own material. Please, either a. Take down the videos. Or, b. credit the source material in each video so that no one mistakes it as original content. If you do credit the book but I'm missing it, then explain where Models is men…
/r/seduction21/11/18 05:08 PM
4

Let's see some infield examples of you using these tips - I can't imagine you've actually field tested these lines unless you show proof.
/r/seduction17/11/18 10:53 PM
2

Just send something funny like a meme or a funny (but short) story from your day - if she responds then you can start a conversation. If she doesn't respond, wait a week or two and then send another message. A lot of game is about timing - a girl's number might have went dead because she started dating some guy. She won't make herself available while she's seeing that guy, but if you send the occasional message she'll suddenly be receptive once she's broken up with that guy (or whatever other li…
/r/seduction17/11/18 10:49 PM
1

Thanks man! I appreciate it.
/r/seduction17/11/18 10:47 PM
1

Pretty much this
/r/seduction17/11/18 10:47 PM
2

I know a guy with 18 inch arms at a low BF and girls rarely initiate with him - he's a very good looking guy but he rarely pulls when he goes out because he doesn't know how to lead. Now, sometimes, girls will touch you on the shoulder or something along those lines. But not all girls will do that. If you're only going to make a move when a girl touches you first you're going to miss 80% of your opportunities. I've pulled tons of girls who never made a physical move before I did. And you actuall…
/r/seduction17/11/18 10:47 PM
8

Women aren't the byproduct of having an amazing life. That's a rationalization that sounds great, but never works out in the end. Yes, having an amazing life helps in a lot of ways, but the underlying reason most guys don't attract beautiful women is their fear of rejection - whether or not like they like to admit it. This fear manifests in a number of ways, including using the me-too movement as an excuse not to try to meet women and telling yourself that if you go monk mode for a while it'll a…
/r/seduction17/11/18 05:28 AM
17

How many people do you personally know who've been falsely accused? I don't know any. This isn't something that you should be worried about unless you're actually sexually assaulting women. Preferring to be safe over sorry is pretty much the main reason so many people live unremarkable lives. It's an excuse to avoid all discomfort, and all the cool experiences life has to offer.
/r/seduction17/11/18 04:04 AM
1

Believe what you want.
/r/seduction15/11/18 02:48 AM
1

It's cool you're making content, but this reads like a high school essay. You should improve your writing if you want your articles to impact more people. If you like, I can give you some recommendations for books/online courses that will help you out.
/r/seduction15/11/18 01:25 AM
1

I'm sitting next to a hot girl, she said you're handsome and that your face is objectively aesthetically pleasing face. But she did say if you got a better haircut you'd be hotter.
/r/seduction15/11/18 01:20 AM
6

All good phycoclogics know that it's important to back your hypnosis with science and studies.
/r/seduction14/11/18 02:28 AM
7

I think the most useful attitude to have is one of optimistic skepticism. You want to be open to the possibility that you can change, you can improve, you can have an amazing life. But you're also skeptical, you don't believe something is true until you've tested it in your own life and gathered a good amount of evidence. I wouldn't just believe an article like this as fact, but I would find the idea intriguing and test it out in my own life before dismissing it or accepting it. That said, I'm p…
/r/TheRedPill11/11/18 11:11 PM
2

It's inspiring footage, which is awesome. But this is SUPER disrespectful to the privacy of these women - showing them in your bed without using a facial blur. Youtube has a face blurring feature, I recommend using it. I'm also not sure about the legality of doing this, if you really don't want to blur the faces, I would at least make sure it's legal to share this publicly.
/r/seduction10/11/18 04:36 AM
2

Great post! Keep taking action man
/r/seduction10/11/18 04:26 AM
5

Interesting post. I've been fascinated by the concept of willpower since I read Roy Baumeister's aptly titled book, "Willpower." I agree that willpower is something important to be aware of and it does play a role in all areas of life, including approach anxiety. However, it's equally important to be careful not to use willpower as an excuse. It might be easier to approach a girl when you got a good night's sleep, but that doesn't mean if you didn't get good sleep you should just stay home - you…
/r/seduction09/11/18 06:42 PM
1

lol, dude, just post good content and you'll get positive comments. You're shooting yourself in the foot by doing this. And if by some chance you are telling the truth, don't enlist your facebook friend to post comments on your articles unless they have more than 15 karma lol - it looks super fishy
/r/seduction09/11/18 06:29 PM
6

You do realize it's obvious that the comments are being left by accounts that you just made to leave positive feedback on your own posts? You're going to ruin your reputation by making it so obvious that you're willing to lie to get ahead.
/r/seduction09/11/18 05:58 AM
2

Are you going out on a weekly basis and approaching women on a weekly basis and you're asking this to take your game to the next level? Or are you asking this because you want women to give you attention without you having to approach them so you can have it easy?
/r/seduction08/11/18 04:03 PM
1

I apologize for the clicking noise in the infield's audio - it sounds better without headphones. There's some valuable lessons to take from the footage, so I decided to upload it despite the imperfect audio.
/r/seduction07/11/18 06:28 PM
2

You don't go to campus on a regular basis? You could fit some game in before you go home from campus. 99% of people spend at least 2 hours (usually a lot more) doing things that are unecessary like watching youtube or netflix, playing video games, facebook, reddit (lol) etc. If you tracked how you spend your time down in a journal, there's a very good chance you'd find an hour or two of time you could dedicate elsewhere. Also, it might take half an hour to get to university, but then after you'v…
/r/seduction07/11/18 02:51 AM
1

Very well said
/r/seduction07/11/18 01:11 AM
1

Yeah man, I know a guy who has been described as, "The worst looking guy out of a thousand guys" who's slept with several cute girls in the last month alone. He's 5'4, has horrible acne, bad facial structure, he's overweight, he has an annoying voice, a huge nose, and he's still doing well.
/r/seduction07/11/18 01:11 AM
1

Seduction is more of an art than a science, there's too many variables to be perfectly scientific about it. That said, most guys who think this way haven't done thousands of approaches, they use it as an excuse not do approaches in the first place. So, sure, if you do ask a thousand girls' for their number and you can't get a date, you may have reason to think game won't work for you (or that you need to change some variables around), but have you taken tons of action already?
/r/seduction07/11/18 01:09 AM
2

I bet you have 5 minutes a day after classes you could spare even during finals ;)
/r/seduction07/11/18 01:05 AM
1

Just start small man, if you've never approached in your life, your first cold approach is a big step. I would just commit to go out 5 minutes per day for at least 4 days a week (ideally every day). Do your best to approach, if you can't, that's ok, just going out and trying counts as a win. It might take a while to start approaching, but when you do it will be such a relief and extremely rewarding (even if the approaches don't go well at first)
/r/seduction07/11/18 12:58 AM
1

well said
/r/seduction07/11/18 12:55 AM
2

My go to is, "Hey, I like your style and I had to say hi." It's basic but it's effective because it starts the compliment on a positive note but it's not directly telling the girl you're sexually attracted to (which takes out the mystery of the interaction and forces the girl to make an immediate decision about you).
/r/seduction07/11/18 12:54 AM
1

Awesome, thanks man!
/r/seduction07/11/18 12:52 AM
4

Personally, I just set a goal to do things that will benefit my life a minimum of five minutes per day: meditate 5 minutes, approach women 5 minutes, write 5 minutes, etc. The habits are so small that I don't feel a desire to procrastinate on them, but once I start writing or going to the gym for five minutes I'll usually want to keep going because starting builds up some positive momentum. As the weeks go by, I do the tasks for longer and longer each time, until I almost become addicted to them…
/r/seduction07/11/18 12:01 AM
2

Great advice!
/r/seduction06/11/18 11:59 PM
2

Not sure why it's been downvoted, I found this video to be very insightful.
/r/seduction06/11/18 09:49 PM
1

Game isn't only about sex, you can do approaches, make connections and exchange numbers with a bunch of girls. Then, next month when you'll have dozens of leads ready to go.
/r/seduction06/11/18 07:29 PM
5

I like it, I'm going to try this out and see how it works. I've already been doing daily habit tracking where I commit to do things like go to the gym every day, meditate, write, stuff like that and it's been working pretty well - however, having a more focused medium-term goal might give me that extra push to get more done.
/r/TheRedPill05/11/18 03:29 AM
1

Great content + good infield examples.
/r/seduction04/11/18 08:51 PM
6

He's not suggesting you memorize canned stories and use them in your interactions with women. He's suggesting you practice telling a story with more emotion and enthusiasm than usual so that you can become a more engaging speaker in general. It's not about the content, it's about the delivery.
/r/seduction04/11/18 05:38 AM
2

Good stuff, motivational and some good points here. I especially like the point that you should go out with the mindset of, "having as much fun as possible." One of the biggest things that holds guys back is they focus too much on the result they want (getting laid) and not enough on having a good time meeting people - which will make getting the result you want much easier. 20 approaches is a good number, I like the idea behind it. But I don't think it's for everyone, for guys who have never ap…
/r/seduction02/11/18 07:03 PM
1

Yeah just keep doing it man! Trying and failing feels much better than failing to try.
/r/seduction02/11/18 03:55 AM
3

He stopped teaching about state years ago because people got obsessed with it and started thinking, "I'm not in state, so I can't approach." And stuff like that. I understand where he's coming from, but state is one of the biggest differentiation between guys who get lackluster results and those who kill it. Whenever I coach someone in person, the first night I teach them how to get into state and they consistently blow their own minds by how well they do.
/r/seduction02/11/18 03:54 AM
1

I had the same sticking point - I overcame it by setting very small goals that I could easily accomplish and build on. I didn't make a goal to go out for 2 hours or to approach 10 girls on my first attempt. I just made a goal to go out (to somewhere with a lot of women), at least 5 minutes a day. The first few days I didn't even approach, but I gave myself props for getting out of the house and trying. After two weeks of doing this, I was approaching like a madman and getting some solid results.…
/r/seduction02/11/18 03:50 AM
1

thanks man!
/r/seduction02/11/18 03:47 AM
2

appreciate it :)
/r/seduction02/11/18 03:47 AM
2

Great idea. One of the common mistakes guys make is they focus too much on "picking up" and "closing" a girl instead of focusing on having fun and expressing themselves. A lot of guys would enjoy doing game a lot more (and get better results) if they focused less on trying to pick girls up and more on connecting with them on a human level.
/r/seduction02/11/18 03:46 AM
1

Always good to see field reports of people taking action! I'd say the most important takeaway for yourself is that you approached women not only by yourself, but sober: very few guys have the balls to do that. You should give yourself props, man. The toughest thing about going out solo in my experience is that when you're not talking to anyone, it's very easy to get into an anti-social state of mind. One thing that helps me is to make sure I don't spend more than a couple minutes without talking…
/r/seduction02/11/18 03:39 AM
1

The only thing more impressive than your advice is your level of humility.
/r/seduction01/11/18 03:06 PM
4

If you can get high quality girls on Tinder, more power to you. But for the most part I see guys pulling girls from Tinder they wouldn't be interested approaching in real life.
/r/TheRedPill01/11/18 03:45 AM
10

It's supposed to be cringy dude. The point is that even cringy lines can work if you deliver them with enough confidence.
/r/TheRedPill01/11/18 03:42 AM
2

Does insulting random people on the internet make your life better in some way?
/r/seduction01/11/18 03:40 AM
1

It's awesome that you got great results. Why do you think it's the beard though? Maybe you've just been in a better mood in general for the last few weeks. Maybe you felt more confident with a beard and so you got more positive attention from people. Maybe you did more approaches than usual during that period and that made you feel more socially outgoing. I've had a beard, I've had no beard - can't say I noticed a difference. It might be a factor, but I know tons of guys who do great with women …
/r/seduction31/10/18 02:22 AM
5

Hey man, you're among the minority of PUA's who's clearly passionate about teaching this stuff and cares more about that than making money. It's extremely refreshing to see. Can't believe this has been downvoted while empty clickbait articles get hundreds of upvotes lol Great content also. It's cool you show some footage of you with her on a date - shows that the number lead to something. Looking forward to seeing more from you.
/r/seduction30/10/18 03:13 PM
14

Good stuff
/r/seduction29/10/18 06:47 PM
1

What about the quality as bad? It looks like a decent camera - do you mean his delivery or the content?
/r/seduction29/10/18 06:33 AM
1

thanks!
/r/seduction29/10/18 02:33 AM
2

Thanks, glad you enjoyed it :)
/r/seduction29/10/18 02:32 AM
1

thanks!
/r/seduction29/10/18 02:32 AM
6

You're completely missing the point. I was saying that Pick up lines don't magically make a girl like you. If you project good energy, any line will work, even if it's actually a bad line (like the examples I gave).
/r/seduction29/10/18 02:30 AM
2

Glad you liked it! If you ever have any questions about game, feel free to send me a PM
/r/seduction29/10/18 02:28 AM
8

Are you trying to make out with a girl or bring her home with you? If you can pull girls without having any conversation, great, please teach me.
/r/seduction29/10/18 02:27 AM
1

It's ironic - you're saying this to a particularly beautiful girl, not one who would think you're being serious. I don't use lines like that regularly, I've just been doing this for so many years that I've experimented with a ton of different approaches, and surprisingly pretty much any line can work if you say it in the right way.
/r/seduction29/10/18 02:25 AM
2

Just lower your bar for success. Instead of trying to go out and approach a bunch of girls on your first attempt, just set a goal to go out to a place where women congregate (bar/club/college/mall) for five minutes each day. When you go out, do your best to approach, but if you can't, it's still a win because you got out of the house and tried. Each time you go out, you'll get a little more comfortable being there, and eventually you'll be able to approach. Might only take a day, might take week…
/r/seduction29/10/18 02:23 AM
2

Thanks man! Part of it is trial and error, you approach, say something, it doesn't work, then you make adjustments until it does work. Just start with a basic opener like, "hey, I liked your style and I had to say hi." Approach girls with it, do your best. You'll learn from what happens and get better.
/r/seduction29/10/18 02:19 AM
3

Change that, start getting out of the house!
/r/seduction29/10/18 02:17 AM
1

How many approaches have you done in the last month? How many approaches would you estimate you've done total up to this point in your life?
/r/seduction29/10/18 02:13 AM
2

I'm working on an article that is exactly what you're describing here - it's a step-by-step template for starting out with approaching and how to hold good conversations. Keep a look out for it on reddit seduction.
/r/seduction29/10/18 02:12 AM
2

Thanks man, I really appreciate it. That's my goal with my content - to make it practical and actionable as opposed to making philosophical stuff that may be interesting, but doesn't directly translate to results.
/r/seduction28/10/18 10:33 PM
5

Great content man - a lot of value in a very short video.
/r/seduction26/10/18 09:41 PM
1

You do thousands of approaches, and there's bound to be a few outliers like that. Rejections like that are rare, it's usually just, "Well, I gotta go find my friends." I just used the worst rejections I've ever gotten as examples to make a point.
/r/seduction25/10/18 08:39 PM
6

Yeah man, I coached a guy to do cold approach for the first time in his life yesterday at a university and he got 5 phone numbers - one of the girls even asked him for his number. Now, not every guy gets such good results on their first try. But pretty much every inexperienced guy I've approached with is shocked by how well it goes - putting yourself out there pays dividends.
/r/seduction25/10/18 08:37 PM
2

Who said anything about receiving nothing but rejection? You won't receive nothing but rejection unless you're doing something VERY wrong, however, most of your interactions will technically be rejections because they won't lead to sex. It might be because the girl is just in a bad mood, maybe she doesn't find you attractive, maybe she has a boyfriend, but not every girl you approach is going to end up in your bed.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/18 02:19 AM
1

Nuanced points are tough for some people.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/18 02:16 AM
3

These are a few of the worst reactions I got out of thousands of approaches, those kind of rejections aren't normal, I'm just pointing out the worst of the worst.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/18 02:15 AM
9

I didn't say it's okay, I said I was grateful for the harsh rejections I got. Totally different. I don't think it's okay that my father died at the age of 39 due to his alcoholism. But I'm grateful it happened because it motivated me to improve as a person. You can see the value in the challenges in your life without being okay with them. Also, I got slapped twice out of thousands and thousands of approaches. These weren't, "I want to hurt you kind of slaps," they were, "I'm offended by what you…
/r/TheRedPill25/10/18 02:14 AM
2

Here's a template for what this might look like: Week 1: Go out at least 15 minutes to approach women Even if you don't approach, that's okay. Your goal is to do as much as possible. But it's a win so long as you go somewhere to approach women and walk around for 15 minutes. Week 2: Go out at least 15 minutes and do 1 approach Now you're getting used to going out, it's time to take things to the next level by making a commitment to do at least 1 approach each day. Week 3: Go out at least 30 minu…
/r/seduction22/10/18 05:28 AM
1

If you have good pictures you can use dating apps like Tinder. You don't have to do an approach, and if you set up a date you already know the girl is interested in you. However, getting the most attractive (or intelligent/successful) women isn't easy on Tinder. For that, your best bet is to approach in person. If you're just trying to get laid and you're not super picky, online dating is great. If you're looking for stunning women or girls who are girlfriend material, online dating sucks. Hones…
/r/seduction22/10/18 05:16 AM
4

Most of that guide is good. But the article has one of the worst suggestions I've ever heard. It says you shouldn't get the girl's number when you approach in college. If you don't get her number, it's very unlikely you'll ever see her again. If you're in a small community college, then maybe, but most universities have tens of thousands of students. Besides, if she likes you, she'll respond positively when you ask for her number - she'll want to hang out with you again. If you don't get her num…
/r/seduction21/10/18 06:26 PM
21

Yeah man, if you're in the top .0001% of guys looks-wise game is going to be easier for you. But if you're not that guy, what are you going to do? Just be a little bitch and not take what you want from life? "These male models don't get rejected, why should I have to get rejected? It's not fair!" If that makes you feel like a winner, go for it. To be clear, I'm not saying looks don't matter, and I'm not saying you shouldn't improve your appearance. I'm just saying your looks aren't an excuse. I'…
/r/TheRedPill21/10/18 06:12 PM
2

Eh, Based Zeus and Tripp Advice don't have any infield and both come across as channels that are mainly about making money rather than helping guys improve. I wouldn't say the advice on those channels is bad, but it's generic, watered down content imo. Alpha M. definitely comes across a guy who's great with women - haven't seen enough of his dating advice videos to comment on whether he's a good teacher or not. Channels with a lot of infield are the most useful to me, there's a big difference in…
/r/seduction20/10/18 07:25 AM
12

A lot of guys will follow a direct approach by showing way too much interest - and it makes the girl feel uncomfortable. It's important to balance showing interest with some playfulness. Mystery didn't invent teasing or push-pulls, anyone who's good at flirting does it naturally. Mystery's style of game is too robotic imo, but it's better to be effective with robotic techniques then to be completely ineffective with whatever comes naturally to you. Lines are a crutch, they're not perfect, but th…
/r/seduction20/10/18 06:07 AM
4

What did you do last Saturday? I have a friend who's 5'4, brown, and has a notoriously unattractive face and body - yet he's pulled two fairly attractive girls in the last week. And that guy has pretty shitty game too, but he takes action and he gets decent results. How much action do you take? If you're not approaching women multiple times per week, then that's why you're not getting the results you want, not because of your skin color or height.
/r/seduction20/10/18 12:05 AM
1

Talking about something vulnerable isn't showing weakness unless you're ashamed of it. Acting tough by never talking about anything vulnerable to show off how "strong" you are -that's what makes you look weak.
/r/TheRedPill26/09/18 02:33 AM
1

I have friends who are better looking and make good money but don't pull at all. I asked the girl sitting across from me what she'd rate him looks wise and she said a 6 or a 7. I'd say that's about right.
/r/TheRedPill22/09/18 03:48 AM
2

If you want to elaborate and provide some feedback I'd be happy to hear it.
/r/TheRedPill21/09/18 10:57 PM
1

My computer (which had all my footage save on it) bit the dust. Gathering more footage now and will post more infields ASAP.
/r/TheRedPill21/09/18 10:56 PM
12

Thanks for the feedback. I'm aware of all this, but part of me likes looking as bad as possible for getting footage - I think it's more inspiring to see a guy who's chubby and poorly groomed get results than it is to see a guy who's maxed out his looks. IDK I could go either way on this though. As far as being overweight - I was in a relationship for over a year and gained over 40lbs. I just stopped caring. Lesson learned. Started counting calories and going hard at the gym, I'll be in good shap…
/r/TheRedPill21/09/18 10:52 PM
13

He's not ugly, but he's not that attractive man, it's his status and personality that make him so effective.
/r/TheRedPill21/09/18 10:43 PM
5

There's a difference between saying sorry to show empathy and saying sorry because you actually feel apologetic. Showing empathy is useful because it lets the girl know that you are socially intelligent and can respect her boundaries - it's a form of calibration.
/r/seduction03/09/18 08:46 PM
6

So, this was my first approach of the day and I felt a little nervous at the beginning - it was a little shaky at first. But you can see throughout the video that I get more "in the zone" and am able to build a good connection. It's okay to be nervous. In fact, girls will appreciate that you approached them even though you were nervous, it shows courage. And your nerves won't last forever, just stick in the interaction and the initial awkwardness will smooth out. The most important point you can…
/r/seduction03/09/18 03:36 AM
1

He's like the summer action movie of dating coaches: he gets the job done, but there's no depth and he's not doing anything new or creative. Not to say he's not good, he's just nowhere near the level of say Todd Vandahey, RSD Tyler, or even Karisma King.
/r/seduction01/09/18 12:58 AM
2

Essentially. If you tell yourself that you can't take action while feeling afraid, you're never going to take action. Accept that approaching is going to be uncomfortable at first, but the discomfort is worth the result you're going after.
/r/seduction28/08/18 04:24 PM
5

Thinking you need to wipe away your fear before you take action is the problem. You don't need to feel a certain way to take action. Change is never going to be easy. The difference between those who succeed and those who fail is that those who succeed are willing to face the pain head on instead of avoiding it.
/r/seduction28/08/18 04:15 PM
4

I didn't say anything about whether Indian guys are good looking. I was saying that Indian guys tend to have insecurities about being unattractive because of their race (as well as Asian guys in general)
/r/TheRedPill20/08/18 07:55 PM
2

I'd say in the 7-8 range. But the number scale is very subjective, to put it more quantitatively I'd say i'm in roughly the top 25% of guys - better than average but not male-model looking by any means.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/18 07:53 PM
2

I see. I could reference the writings of evolutionary psychologists like David Buss as evidence for those points. I'll make sure to do so in the future.
/r/seduction18/08/18 12:00 AM
2

I went out with a guy who hasn't slept with a girl in 12 years last night. He approached like 50 women. He got 5 numbers. He made out with an exceptionally attractive tall blonde girl and walked to her uber with her. He didn't quite end up sleeping with her, but he had a blast and he made a lot of progress towards having an abundance mentality. He went from no action in 12 years to a makeout and 5 numbers in one night - How? He got out of his own way and started approaching women. At first it wa…
/r/seduction13/08/18 09:44 PM
2

There's definitely a difference - nervousness comes through in subtle differences in the muscles around your eyes. That's okay, though, just keep practicing and you'll get comfortable with it - the results you'll get are worth it.
/r/seduction13/08/18 04:44 AM
17

This is a fair point, actually. Leading hard is a big part of pulling. One time I got in an uber with a girl and she said, "we're going to the flamingo," (her hotel). I just told the driver, "Sorry sir, we're actually going to (my hotel)". (later that night, we hooked up) Another time, a girl and her friend dropped me off at my hotel, and the girl who I had been talking to said, "It was nice meeting you, have a good night." I said, "Get out of the cab and hug me goodbye," she did, then I said, "…
/r/TheRedPill12/08/18 11:35 PM
2

Wings help most when dealing with groups of two girls. Your wing jump on one girl you jump on the other and pull together - it's an ideal situation. It also happens that girls who go out in groups of two tend to be the most DTF - girls go out in groups of two because they WANT to get hit on and in many cases, go home with a guy. You don't want to limit yourself by only approaching 2 sets, but if you see two hot girls with no one else, definitely jump on that.
/r/TheRedPill12/08/18 11:24 PM
1

Yeah man, I've had success with really stupid lines like, "Is it hot in here, or is that the holy spirit burning inside you?" But lines like that are very easy to do wrong. Fun to experiment with, but you have to be careful not to turn into a "dancing monkey" who says things that are peculiar to avoid being vulnerable(I say this having done so many times).
/r/seduction24/07/18 10:37 PM
1

Which style has worked better for you so far?
/r/seduction24/07/18 10:00 PM
4

The examples seem too "tryhard" to me. They seem like you put a lot of effort into thinking of something clever and cute to say. I agree with your general philosophy about indirect vs. direct though. Personally, I like to compliment a girl on her style/fashion - this allows me to convey interest without "giving away my power". That kind of opener is especially good during daygame because you need to establish why you're talking to her (or she'll assume you're trying to sell her something).
/r/seduction24/07/18 09:57 PM
5

I'm curious, roughly how many women have you approached in the year-2 years you've been active in the community?
/r/seduction24/07/18 04:07 PM
1

It's okay to be frustrated and upset, use that to light a fire under your ass to take action.
/r/seduction24/07/18 12:25 AM
4

People never told me that showing sexual intent was immoral and creepy. Yet, for some reason, I still believed that showing my sexuality was creepy. I'm not sure where it came from tbh - I wasn't religious, and no one told me upfront that I shouldn't show my interest in women. My best guess is that this belief that I shouldn't show women my interest came from TV shows/movies or something. Either that or, it was a defense mechanism. Perhaps I was afraid to get rejected, so I created a narrative "…
/r/seduction24/07/18 12:23 AM
1

Over the top marketing doesn't necessarily mean the product itself is bad. Max's first program, The Natural is pretty legit. The content could certainly be condensed, but it has like a solid 40 hours of material, covering pretty much every area of game. That said, I think the best part of the Natural was the hotseat infield section (like 8 hours of infield breakdowns) and it doesn't look like girlfriend game has any infield, so I"m not gonna get it. RSD's marketing is spammy, but most of their p…
/r/seduction19/07/18 04:15 AM
1

Just download youtube videos- there's way more quality PUA content on Youtube than on podcasts.
/r/seduction19/07/18 02:53 AM
-5

If you didn't watch it how could you know the content doesn't live up to the title? If you start watching it, and it becomes clear that title is undeserved, THEN it would make sense to downvote the video.
/r/seduction19/07/18 02:01 AM
1

Sections in the video: The Charisma Trap: https://youtu.be/BoUG5xCdsME?t=53s Charisma and Social Flow: https://youtu.be/BoUG5xCdsME?t=2m57s States Become Traits: https://youtu.be/BoUG5xCdsME?t=5m22s Focus Your Gaze Outwards: https://youtu.be/BoUG5xCdsME?t=6m55s What it really means to be confident: https://youtu.be/BoUG5xCdsME?t=8m24s Confidence building exercises: https://youtu.be/BoUG5xCdsME?t=11m4s
/r/seduction06/06/18 11:10 PM
1

truth
/r/seduction10/04/18 02:50 PM
1

This would be ten times more useful if you linked a relevant resource for each point. If you linked one in-depth article and one book for HOW to improve on each of these areas, this post would have a lot more meat to it. For example, for point 3 you could link this video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pj6qhHYLeMU and the book, Models. It's certainly useful to know what makes a man attractive, but without some guidance for how to get there, that advice is rather hollow.
/r/seduction20/03/18 05:40 AM
4

In your first point, you're talking about upsetting your parents/family, but that's not what approaching a girl is like at all- she's not a member of your family. Two totally different things. We don't experience social anxiety for interacting with out families nearly as much as we do say, public speaking in front of strangers. Do you really know how relationships were arranged or are you just making assumptions? Anyway, I don't think the cause of approach anxiety is really that important. What …
/r/seduction13/02/18 09:55 PM
4

If your game is so bad that you have to worry about fake numbers, the solution isn't to test the numbers, it's to improve your game.
/r/seduction12/02/18 03:19 AM
2

Interesting post. I agree that morality holds back guys in game, but I think it goes deeper than not wanting to help a girl cheat. Guys feel a certain level of guilt towards doing game, that game itself (cold approaching women) is immoral, mechanical, and sleazy. I think guys feel guilty for even wanting to have casual sex with women, I know I used to feel that way. Personally, I have no problem sleeping with a girl who has a boyfriend, but I can't say 60% of my results come from girls who are i…
/r/seduction05/02/18 09:03 PM
2

The fact that it's hard is what makes it so rewarding when you actually do it.
/r/seduction03/02/18 03:37 AM
1

If you're nervous it's a bit awkward, but once you get confident with it, it's not awkward at all. You have to go through that initial awkwardness, there's no way around it (unless you don't want to get laid, that is).
/r/seduction03/02/18 03:34 AM
2

You're only going to feel better when you take better actions. Focusing on getting some new insight that will change the game for you is just a form of mental masturbation. Inner game doens't come from reading, it comes from approaching women and getting reference experiences. There's no shortcut, you're going to have to take massive action if you want to get the change you're looking for.
/r/seduction03/02/18 03:32 AM
3

Reading books is cool, but the most important thing is that you get out there and start approaching women and learn from your experiences. Read books and watch videos as supplements to going out, but not as a substitute. Frankly, most people read a bunch of stuff, but never go out, it's just a form of procrastination. Go to clubs/your college campus/or even a mall and start practicing approaching women, no reason to wait. It'll probably be anxiety provoking and somewhat awkward at first, but tha…
/r/seduction03/02/18 03:30 AM
1

Thanks a lot :)
/r/seduction02/02/18 05:45 AM
1

Glad you liked it man!
/r/seduction02/02/18 05:45 AM
2

I had this sticking point at one point. I just started using a direct opener, "I thought you were cute and I had to say hi." I did that until I got comfortable with showing intent, definitely helped.
/r/seduction02/02/18 05:45 AM
1

Do it man!
/r/seduction02/02/18 05:42 AM
1

Lol! Guess it wasn't as creative as I thought.
/r/seduction02/02/18 05:39 AM
1

Do you actually approach women and pull or are you just talking out of your ass?
/r/seduction02/02/18 05:38 AM
1

Thanks :)
/r/seduction02/02/18 05:38 AM
1

Agreed
/r/seduction01/02/18 04:39 AM
3

Do you need some butter to cut with all that edginess?
/r/seduction01/02/18 04:38 AM
2

Very nice write up
/r/seduction01/02/18 04:36 AM
7

Awesome, dude. Thanks for sharing, it helps balance out all the complaining lol
/r/seduction29/01/18 08:37 PM
2

Thanks man. It's a pretty nuanced point, it's the paradox of intent and freedom from outcome- I wouldn't say I explained it perfectly. When you're "alpha" sometimes you get rejected, but you don't really take the rejection seriously, you know you can still get the girl. You know you could move on and get another girl, but since you've decided you're going to get this girl, you persist (up to a certain point). That's my take, anyway.
/r/seduction14/01/18 05:32 AM
0

Ironically, this comment is vague, too. What's garbage imo is whiny criticism that doesn't leave room for discussion or further thought- "This sucks, wah" Cool story, bro. However, if you want to put on your thinking cap and criticize in a way that opens up a discussion or gives people something to think about, that's helpful. If, for example, you were to say why you think the terms and explanations are vague or what, specifically makes the post "garbage," then you're doing something of some wor…
/r/seduction14/01/18 05:22 AM
-3

Your language seems to imply that we disagree about something, but your first sentence is basically parroting exactly what I said. Then, your second and third paragraph are totally tangential, it has nothing to do with the article- I don't necessarily disagree with what you're saying, but you're acting as if it spits in the face of what I wrote, which it doesn't. Did you read the post at all? PS: You sound whiny af
/r/seduction14/01/18 12:58 AM
2

Considering the amount of companies that have banned Roosh from use (Disqus, Paypal, etc.) Patreon might not be the best answer, they're a Silicon Valley company, would probably delete your account at some point because it's not SJW friendly.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/18 03:04 AM
2

What exactly do you mean the results have been amazing? Before you watched the video you had trouble approaching women, and since you've watched it you've taken a lot more action? I'm skeptical of hypnosis (especially self-hypnosis recordings), and the idea of listening to a recording about approach anxiety instead of just getting over it by approaching seems kinda screwy to me. But I'm open to the idea, it's just "the results have been amazing" is too vague to really mean anything. What results…
/r/seduction12/01/18 04:42 AM
-2

There clearly was, I wasn't trying to write a romance novel sex scene.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/18 08:25 PM
1

Tbh I saw it in an old Julien Blanc infield and I was curious what would happen if I tried it out, I always like to try different things.
/r/seduction09/01/18 08:24 PM
-14

The fact that you couldn't figure out it was a typo makes me wonder, are you retarded?
/r/TheRedPill09/01/18 02:03 AM
1

Now we're upgrading to ad hominem, nice. Just because someone was wrong about some things doesn't mean they're wrong about everything. Freud was wrong about a lot of things, so what? You seem to be looking at this in a very black and white kind of way, maybe Freud's concepts of the Ego, Id, and Superego aren't 100% true or accurate, but there is some element of truth in them, ideas- especially in the realm of psychology- aren't always wrong or right, they can have some merit without being perfec…
/r/TheRedPill07/01/18 03:50 AM
1

In general, self-awareness makes room for change. For example, if you hadn't heard of pickup, and you genuinely believed the idea of cold approaching a girl and sleeping with her was absurd, you wouldn't even try, it's not until you're aware that it's possible that you might take action. When your aware off the things that hold you back, you can be proactive in overcoming those obstacles.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/18 03:42 AM
1

By "In tune" I don't mean completely enveloped by, that would be describing a total psychopath. By in tune I mean in touch with. It's not black and white 0 or 100, but most guys are really out of touch with that side of their psyche.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/18 03:36 AM
1

It's a lot easier to attack a person and say that because some of what he says was wrong that everything he says must be wrong than it is to actually have a logical discussion about a particular concept. Nuanced thinking is hard, can't expect most people to want to engage in it lol- such is life.
/r/seduction07/01/18 03:34 AM
1

Well-said. Although, I don't agree with the Beatles example, the Beatles are better than most modern rock bands to this day imo.
/r/seduction07/01/18 03:30 AM
18

And afterwards, we'll discuss how to make pointless strawman arguments instead of doing anything remotely intelligent.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/18 05:08 AM
2

"Surreal: Use as many pickup phrases while talking to girls" I think this gets to the core of what self-amusement means, because obviously you're not going to use a lot of pickup phrases to make a girl laugh, only because you find it hilarious/awkward. Probably would be a good exercise to do this in interactions on purpose, if girls like it it's a good sign that you have a feel for self-amusement. If they don't, it probably means you're being too self-conscious/hesitant/etc. Great content, man, …
/r/seduction05/01/18 02:12 AM
1

The short answer is to start going out and approaching women; go to night-clubs, your college campus, or even nearby malls or busy streets- whatever your best options are for locations with a good amount of attractive women. That's easier said than done though, so you might want to read a book like The Rules of The Game or The Trial:Transform Your Dating Life In Eight Weeks for a step-by-step guide for how to learn game in the field. For the most part, you want to avoid reading or watching too m…
/r/seduction04/01/18 11:53 PM
2

Models is a great book in terms of mindsets, but it doesn't help much in terms of how to actually go about learning game (which is important, most people get it wrong). For that, I'd recommend Todd V's Winner Game (which is a free online program).
/r/seduction04/01/18 11:51 PM
-8

It's a free article, I don't quite understand your point. Also, you haven't actually given a reason that it's a "failed attempt"
/r/seduction17/12/17 05:09 AM
-10

Great constructive criticism, thanks for adding value.
/r/seduction17/12/17 05:08 AM
1

There's a lot to like in this article, the differences between day-game and night-game are well explained. However, the points being made are exaggerated, for example, this quote: "She looks at you like you have leprosy. One word answers. It's awkward. You never get a text. You notice her avoiding you the next few days... her friends stare at you." Being direct in daygame does put a lot of pressure on the girl, so it can make her uncomfortable, especially if she's with friends. But, if the girl …
/r/TheRedPill13/12/17 06:36 AM
1

I'm not clear on why it's so awful for a woman to have sex with multiple partners? I mean if she's a drug addict who doesn't use condoms or something yeah, that's not ideal. But even then, you can still use a condom. Seems like a double standard, it's not like most of us learn game to only have sex with one woman in life, why shouldn't a woman experience something similar? Men and women are different, I'm all for that, but some of the differences complained about here just seem to be sexist with…
/r/TheRedPill13/12/17 06:18 AM
7

Lol- I didn't know I was an extremist Islamist.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/17 09:07 PM
1

Lol, most of this is such bad advice.
/r/seduction18/10/17 04:38 AM
3

1- Acting Desperate means that you are investing in her more than she is investing in you. For example, if you message her twice even though she didn't respond to you, that's desperate. If you're always the one walking up to her and talking to her or if you're the one always inviting her out. Stuff like that. 2) It depends on what you mean by your social environment- if you mean you live in a small city, then you're fucked and your first priority should be to get out. If you mean something else,…
/r/TheRedPill17/10/17 02:24 AM
1

Good question.
/r/seduction02/10/17 06:47 PM
2

Beautiful echo chamber you're living in. It's pretty obvious you're a keyboard warrior who doesn't actually do pickup, but if forum outrage makes you feel accomplished, more power to you.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/17 07:33 PM
4

If you were good with girls and you read something that was overly complicated and 'hamstering' then you would just find it funny. The fact that such articles piss you off makes me think you have some insecurities to work on. Do you actually cold approach girls? Do you get results with attractive girls regularly? Based on the overall attitude of this comment I'm guessing probably not. If I'm wrong and you're some PUA god that understands the simple truth about women and sexual attraction- then m…
/r/TheRedPill29/09/17 02:58 AM
1

post Haha, clever- didn't see that coming!
/r/TheRedPill28/09/17 07:22 PM
1

Thanks man, I appreciate it.
/r/TheRedPill28/09/17 05:24 PM
2

I disagree with a lot of his ideas, but I still think they're valuable because his work is great at making you ask new questions you wouldn't have asked otherwise.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/17 07:14 PM
2

I'd say it's max your looks while doing game. The problem with waiting to learn game until you've maxed your looks is it can turn into procrastination forever. There's no reason you can't start practicing today while also hitting the gym, getting better clothes etc as an ongoing process. The brain can really trick you into never approaching girls because you haven't handled your looks enough or gotten enough money, etc. It's best to start practicing and building your skills now.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/17 03:21 PM
3

This threatening tone is certainly uncalled for. However, I understand why you'd ask this question, so I'll happily answer it: I'm 5'11 I weight 200lbs (a bit overweight, I'm skinny-fat) I have a better than average face but not model looking. I'm 26 N count means lay count? About 100. Mostly pulled 8s, some 9s, some 7s and in the early days when I drank a lot, I pulled some below a 7 too.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/17 03:19 PM
1

Anyone that charges an unreasonably high price for a book is an internet marketer and shouldn't be trusted. If the book doesn't exist on amazon, doubly so. If it does exist on Amazon read the preview and get a sense of whether the book is genuinely written to help guys out or not.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/17 03:17 PM
2

o put yo Agreed, the vulnerability part was one of the more eye opening sections of the book.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/17 03:14 PM
2

And to be fair, I don't think Mark Manson was the best hardcore pickup guy, but a lot of his principles are sound regardless.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/17 02:44 PM
2

Absolutely, something like 80% of your time should be spent in the field. However, after that it's good to have content because it can help you interpret what happened in a useful way and learn from your mistakes more effectively. There are people who take a lot of action but make the same mistakes again and again, you don't want that to happen to you.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/17 02:43 PM
1

My bad, it's corrected now.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/17 02:40 PM
6

I've read the Mystery method, I think there's merit to a lot of the concepts, however, that material can easily backfire if you don't have the inner game to back it up. Daybang is by roosh right? His stuff isn't bad, I just think it's missing certain elements. And no, I'm quite happy with the results I've gotten in game.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/17 02:39 PM
6

Men Love Women Whole, Women Only Love The Idea of Men And Their Perception Of Him- What makes you think men don't merely love their perception of women also? This is sexist for the sake of being sexist as far as I can tell. Men and women are certainly different, but taking the red pill isn't just about seeing women's ulterior motives, it's about seeing men's too.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/17 09:21 PM
3

What kind of results do you get? How many women have you approached? Obviously looks matter and should be optimized, but so does your game, being dismissive of it is extremely binary thinking.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/17 07:03 AM
4

Yeah man. The extent stuff you can make happen sexually with the right words said with conviction is crazy (most people wouldn't believe some of the stuff I've seen happen).
/r/TheRedPill07/07/17 06:57 AM
1

Yeah, it's pretty weird. But thanks, will do.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/17 05:42 PM
5

In one video, practical psychology says that you can speed up time by running fast because of the law of relativity (I'm serious). The degree to which this guy doesn't understand science is incredible. People only believe what he says because the videos have good animation and his large subscription base creates social proof. For the most part his arguments are anything but scientific or logical.
/r/seduction04/07/17 04:33 AM
1

I just noticed that several people commented that it was deleted. It must have been deleted by a mod. Some of the comments look like they're not from trp, maybe that has something to do with it?
/r/TheRedPill04/07/17 04:16 AM
2

Thanks for the feedback. I always appreciate constructive criticism (which is super rare on reddit).
/r/TheRedPill16/06/17 04:07 AM
5

Being negative Thinking in black and white Making excuses
/r/TheRedPill16/06/17 04:05 AM
2

Have you ever seen girls approach guys? It's the most basic stuff that they fuck up. They aren't positive, they don't lead, they don't consider how she's feeling etc.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/17 04:04 AM
7

Maybe you have a self-defeating victim mindset that you need to work on.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/17 12:24 AM
18

Agreed. I got reactive though and humor did not come to my mind. Learning experience.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/17 08:21 PM
16

No, her husband was in the other room. She was just a bitch, reactions like that are rare, but everyone once in a while that happens.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/17 08:21 PM
19

That's actually not my site, my site is redpilltheory.com Anyway there's lot of free content available on his site, you don't have to buy the book.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/17 08:19 PM
2

Thanks for the heads up. The website domain hosting got taken down. Turns out I wasn't paying for it LOL. The warning messages were going into my promotions tab so I didn't see them. Have to make a whole new site. Oh well, such is life!
/r/seduction13/06/17 11:38 PM
1

I had to reply because of the link to Korra. I mean that a lot of guys try to prove how cool they are by pretending not to care. But trying not to care is still trying. It's like when you go up to a girl and you try to act uninterested even though you are. You come off as weird because you're trying to hard to act uninterested.
/r/seduction13/06/17 07:18 AM
5

I could tell you that to be have a life without suffering all you need to do is let go of desire and I wouldn't be totally wrong. I could tell you that to succeed at anything all you need to do is take a lot of risks and learn from your mistakes. Would that be helpful? No. Humans are creatures of meaning, to make sense of advice they need to understand why something is the way it is.
/r/seduction13/06/17 07:13 AM
3

I think you've got the idea. Arousal is largely created by your frame and it's preverbal. Attraction is very different. You can have one without the other, attraction without arousal is friend zone. Arousal without attraction can scare a girl and be too socially uncalibrated. You want to build attraction because it's to your benefit to not only make her want you to fuck her but to like you as a person (for obvious reasons). Words don't make you seem approval seeking, the context does. If you kno…
/r/TheRedPill11/06/17 07:20 PM
2

That's awesome. And I'm working on an article about the foot in the door technique already haha!
/r/TheRedPill11/06/17 03:30 PM
8

UM. How are your results with women dude? This sounds very 'keyboard warrior' to me.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/17 05:12 AM
3

Sometimes ideas that seemingly contradict actually complement each other. You can make women feel a connection with you without being needy, you can make them feel liked without having a weak frame, etc.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/17 02:08 AM
1

And now, thanks to this comment, also a bit full of myself ;)
/r/seduction10/06/17 09:32 PM
1

I'm impressed by the quality of responses. Pluglord's right, being clear in your intent (in a confident way) is a huge turn on.
/r/seduction08/06/17 04:53 AM
1

I guess it's not clear that the title is a bit tongue-in-cheek.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/17 07:07 AM
1

I agree IF you only approach top-tier girls. Generally, I approach a good amount and if I'm talking to a girl who I'm kinda into I get her number and bounce to meet others. I usually collect a few numbers and sometimes I end up inviting one from earlier to eat after or whatever.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/17 06:58 AM
1

Blowouts is hard to estimate, sometimes in Vegas I'll do like 50 approaches in a night and get maybe 5-10 blowouts but in other cities I'll do 20 and rarely ever get a blowout. By blowout I just mean a girl says something like 'not interested' or gives the cold shoulder. Dates? Probably about 50? Maybe more. Lays? About 100. A lot of 7s a lot of 8s, a handful higher than 8s and a handful lower than 7 lol
/r/TheRedPill23/05/17 03:46 PM
-18

Okay, I don't care if you do or don't: no one asked you to. The first lesson is somewhat rudimentary (although essential), but I wonder if you even read the second before commenting because it's certainly not. And you think a link at the bottom of a post is guerilla marketing, I wonder if you know the definition of guerilla? Or marketing?
/r/TheRedPill23/05/17 01:02 AM
2

Good post man. Flow States have been shown to increase the productivity of CEO's by as much as 500%. It also doubles the speed at which you learn, the 10,000 hours to mastery becomes 5,000 hours to mastery. Definitely something worth paying attention to in your life. Btw, flow does a lot more than affect dopamine, it releases norepinephrine, dopamine, anandamide, serotonin and endorphins. http://bigthink.com/videos/the-neurochemistry-of-flow-states-with-steven-kotler
/r/TheRedPill23/05/17 12:05 AM
103

Straight to the fuckin' point eh?
/r/seduction21/05/17 02:57 PM
1

I didn't say you have to, I said it helps. Afterwards I said that I had success without those things.
/r/seduction21/05/17 04:41 AM
2

Glad you found it helpful, man.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/17 04:59 AM
1

Those actions are the actions that get you to face rejection. Simple one could be just going out and asking girls on dates. You can gain social status, and I'm not saying it won't help, but this can turn into endless procrastination. Gain social status, money, fitness WHILE also approaching women and building the skillset. At one point I was a vastly underachieving guy who attracted women, so it's definitely possible. But honestly dude, I would question your thinking that you are not resourceful…
/r/seduction20/05/17 04:58 AM
1

1) I'd guess it has a lot to do with the shame of being raised in an extremely religious household, but I can't know for sure. 2. I'll go more in to the specifics in part 3. Yeah, you can't really talk yourself out of it. There's two main approaches that I find to be effective. One is to surrender to the anxiety, just sit with it, don't try to fight it, you can even try to make it worse consciously, by leaning into it, it loses it's emotional charge. Anxiety is a state in which you're fighting a…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/17 09:07 PM
1

That's cool. He admitted what he was doing afterwards. And frankly, I have a more objective view of him than he does of himself (and vice versa). Source on Carol Dweck's mindset research being bullshit? There's a lot of research beyond hers into mindset, hundreds upon hundreds of studies that reach the general conclusion that mindsets are something like a far more powerful and robust version of the placebo effect.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/17 08:40 PM
25

Part three will go more into what the step-by-step process looks like. The Subtle Art of Not Giving a Fuck by Mark Manson goes deep into building self-awareness, fantastic book. Thinking, Fast and Slow is written by Nobel prize winning psychologist Daniel Kahneman and shows you many of the mistakes that the brain makes, reading it will seriously help you understand your own mind. The writing style isn't the most fun to read, but the content is brilliant.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/17 09:20 AM
1

Everything is an oversimplification when looked at through a microscope, it's up to you to be able to put an idea into a larger context with all its nuances and subtleties. Trying to not give a fuck is something people do to prove they don't care when they care too much, I agree. But that doesn't mean there aren't people who actually don't care much what other people think of them, people who aren't reliant on social validation do exist. Honestly, it's up to you to be able to not take ideas to t…
/r/TheRedPill14/05/17 08:11 PM
1

Emotions aren't intrinsically bad, it's resisting them that makes them gain power over you. Sounds like you're at war with your emotions, and the harder you fight them, the more power you give them. Personally, I do a mindfulness meditation where I intentionally experience and lean into negative emotions to build a habit of non-resistance to them.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/17 10:32 PM
1

That's tough because sugar is physiologically addictive. The most effective way (based on psychological research) to break quit something like this is similar to what I wrote about here, it's called acceptance and commitment therapy. The extremely basic way to look at it is that you embrace your cravings but make a commitment to act in spite of them. The cravings become overwhelming when you try to deny their existence. I can't really explain it adequately here though, there's a book called Brea…
/r/TheRedPill13/05/17 06:14 PM
1

Thanks man, appreciate it. It wouldn't be fun without stiff competition haha.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/17 12:14 AM
2

I agree, most people I know who read this kind of advice are leaning on the socially aware side, the problem is their social awareness is hyperactive, they don't just feel the room, they make assumptions about what's going to happen before it happens. Of course, there's the occasional exception who should be careful with this kind of advice.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/17 03:44 AM
1

Huge fan of Thinking fast, and slow, which it would appear you've read lol. You may be right, 'just be yourself' is only good advice when understood in the terms of system 1 thinking. Unfortunately, people who are interested in advice and self-help tend to lean towards system 2 thinking as far as I can tell.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/17 03:38 AM
2

You are implying that LTR's are founded on better values than sexual variety and adventure. I think it's a stretch to suggest that the frame for sexual variety is limited to validation by having multiple chicks select you for sex (not saying that doesn't usually play a role, either, though) I understand why that can be argued, the value in commitment, and building something deeply with someone, but at the same time, I think there's genuine value in meeting new people and having sexual experience…
/r/TheRedPill05/05/17 02:24 AM
3

That's fine and all if you can a. not get caught and b. don't feel shame
/r/TheRedPill03/05/17 12:34 AM
3

I'm pretty emotionally unreactive, but I'm not a sociopath, and if emotions don't effect you at all than something is wrong with you.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/17 12:33 AM
1

This goes both ways, everyone has a confirmation bias. Don't overestimate yourself buddy.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/17 12:31 AM
1

I made a youtube video in which I had a girl ask guys out, and it went really well, you may be approaching in an uncallibrated way. And I knew rape culture was taking it far, it was hyperbole lol. But the point was relevant nonetheless. P.S. I know I'm intelligent, my mother reminds me of that fact every day.
/r/seduction24/04/17 03:08 AM
1

I know women get anxiety lol
/r/seduction24/04/17 03:01 AM
1

If you're a high quality woman then chances are this post doesn't really apply to you. Most women don't approach men (love it when they do, though). The philosophy of learning how to get over approach anxiety isn't really relevant (or easy to understand) if you're a woman unless you do cold approach pickup, which is rare. It's similar to me telling women what I think about rape culture as a man, I don't experience it, so commenting on it would make me look like an idiot.
/r/seduction24/04/17 02:18 AM
1

Right, but just telling yourself , "Just do it' isn't a strategy that works, if it was most Americans wouldn't be overweight and most people wouldn't fail to live out their dreams. If you want to succeed in anything you need a good strategy. How's 'finding confidence' in everyday mundane things' working out for you buddy? Approaching without hesitation on a regular basis? Sleeping with high quality women? If not, stfu with your feel good bullshit and humble yourself enough to learn from others w…
/r/seduction24/04/17 02:03 AM
1

Well said retort.
/r/seduction24/04/17 01:46 AM
1

Depends what you mean by large town, there's a big difference in 10,000 and 100,000, if your town is 10,000, getting a reputation is a much bigger concern than in a town of 100,000. Even guys who are extremely charismatic will creep some women out if they go about meeting women in a way that could lead to results. You will creep some women out, in my opinion, it's not a big deal, it's not emotionally traumatizing to meet a guy and think he's weird, it's something you get over after a couple minu…
/r/seduction23/04/17 03:43 AM
-2

I'm sorry that I hampered your experience somehow? Would you like a nice cup of tea or a massage? Would that help make you feel better? I'm not spamming, so I really don't understand how this could have any negative impact on anyone at all, ever. I hate spam, but this is not that.
/r/seduction22/04/17 03:36 PM
-2

Is a link at the bottom of a post offensive? Does it somehow ruin your day or change the quality (or lack thereof of the article)? Also, the rule specifies that link posts shouldn't be to books, this isn't a link, it's an article I wrote (and btw it's original content for this site) and it has a link at the end, two totally different things.
/r/seduction22/04/17 03:28 PM
2

Anywhere in the 'normal' range looks won't be such a disadvantage that you can't get good results, hell, I know a guy who's like a four who's pulled some pretty attractive girls. How many numbers to get a number etc has a lot to do with how good your game is, how confident you are, etc. If you're a hard-case in the sense that you lack social confidence and don't have much experience with women, then it could take a while to get results, but there's a lot of factors. Mainly 1. How much action you…
/r/seduction22/04/17 06:58 AM
1

Um, pickup doesn't have to be a big deal lol. It's just approaching girls to develop a skillset. Idk why you see it as something that's super weird, being social and meeting people's totally normal imo. Women are a part of a normal, well-rounded life :)
/r/TheRedPill20/04/17 03:40 AM
9

Do you approach? Or do you use the gym as an excuse to wait until your 'swole' Elaborate rationalizations are easy to get trapped in, I hope you can look at things from a logical, emotionally detached perspective.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/17 08:32 PM
3

To me, bluepill thinking is oversimplified thinking that can't appreciate nuance and paradox. Compliments can work, so can teasing and lack of investment, they can coexist.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/17 07:02 PM
10

Start with something small and innocuous like, "I like your style, very cool." Then build up to better compliments. Anyway, you're not fucked, you don't have to be charming to get laid, it's just one effective route. If complimenting isn't your thing showing a lot of intent and being challenging can work as well, but you'll have to lead harder than if you're charming.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/17 03:26 AM
5

How's that working out for you buddy?
/r/TheRedPill18/04/17 02:58 AM
87

Yes, so can black-and-white overly simplistic thinking. Charm doesn't exist in a vacuum, you can be charming while still having mystique or being challenging, etc. Just like you can post poorly thought out comments without really thinking, but still be an intelligent human being in other areas of your life.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/17 02:57 AM
34

Learn to have both, it's not black and white.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/17 02:33 AM
27

Charm isn't about impressing them, it's about making them feel good about themselves. And I know lots of people who have trouble with being funny or charming lol.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/17 02:17 AM
1

Actually, there's two types of exposure, gradual and flooding, flooding is full immersion from the beginning. In addition, you have no idea because I've done them many times and have never received ridicule.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/17 12:42 AM
1

Just because it sounds stupid doesn't mean it is, do you have evidence to support your claim or are you just dismissing it based on your gut reaction? It's called exposure therapy and is well established.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/17 11:32 PM
-1

Strawman arguments make for productive discussion.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/17 10:02 PM
0

It reduces approach anxiety, absolutely. But it doesn't build improvisational skills for a lot of guys. They're too uncomfortable saying anything 'weird'. I know lots of guys who approach but don't get better, I wish it were that easy, but you also have to do things that make you uncomfortable. Once you get comfortable with being awkward, you free yourself to be fun, spontaneous, and genuine.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/17 08:12 PM
2

You're not wrong, it's bad to be a dancing monkey, however, if you're not fun you need to use a behavioral crutch to get over your discomfort with being awkward. And talking to X amount of women doesn't necessarily do anything in this regard, I know guys who approach every night and are boring and cold as fuck. The point of the candy ring is to overcome your fear of being perceived as being pathetic, it's the fear of being judged that stops us from being fun. Maybe I need a better way to explain…
/r/TheRedPill17/04/17 07:20 PM
8

It's not just for pussy, it's for letting go of taking yourself too seriously. But based on your response, you've already mastered the art.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/17 07:15 PM
-12

No, a better source for that would be your life story.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/17 07:14 PM
2

You were naturally fun as a child, then it got sucked out of you. Do you really know what parts of your personality are natural and which parts were tacked on via the influence of your parents, friends, and society. You don't, but accepting that you're not fun and never will be certainly is easier.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/17 07:13 PM
19

We prefer to call it a mobile home community.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/17 04:42 AM
1

It's only creepy if you're creepy. If you are cringey and you read about how to be persistent, it will read as cringey because you imagine yourself saying those things. If you are confident and positive, it's totally different. How many women have you approached this week? What results have you gotten? Have you tried any of these things? If you haven't done a lot of approaches or practiced persistence, you're an idiot who shouldn't comment on something until they've tried it themselves, your ass…
/r/seduction20/03/17 09:06 PM
1

I was formatting it after posting because it didn't copy paste correctly, but what made you cringe exactly?
/r/seduction20/03/17 08:55 PM
-6

"If you want to succeed double your failure rate- some IBM engineer." -some guy on reddit. Your response is cute, but it literally doesn't make a logical argument. You're using the strawman fallacy by finding counterevidence through cherrypicking a (not even real) counter example to make the point that some people who fail a lot don't succeed. Look at the stories of people who have succeeded and you will consistently see many failures. It's a prerequisite for success because it's necessary to le…
/r/TheRedPill19/03/17 03:45 PM
1

Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see how that implies it would not be of value for a peahen to want a male with high survival value. His large display implies that he has good evolutionary fitness to survive, the female wants her offspring to also have good evolutionary fitness and to survive, so she is more inclined to mate with a male who has a large display. It's a genetic advantage, has nothing to with the peacock taking care of the kids.
/r/seduction19/03/17 03:33 PM
1

It's good to be a skeptic, but you have to be a skeptic who's open to positive interpretations if you want to get any results in life.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/17 11:57 PM
1

It's good to be a skeptic, but making a lot of negative presumptions isn't going to help you in your interactions with the opposite sex. There are always a lot of variables, control for them as well as you can using your field reports, make adjustments, and see what patterns emerge. It's never going to be perfect science, but you will notice trends. And yes, some girls don't like having someone chat their heads off, if you have basic social intelligence you will notice when a girl isn't having i…
/r/seduction18/03/17 09:25 PM
1

Yeah, I don't know how well my first book will do, but I have a big enough audience that I'll be able to get a lot of feedback, and I'll use that to make my second book even better. Frankly, there's not much good competition in the self-help genre, it's mostly fluffy bullshit, I don't think it will be too hard to stand out in the genre in the long-term. If you're interested in publishing a book, especially anywhere in the self-help industry, I'd go for it (so long as you have good ideas).
/r/TheRedPill18/03/17 09:13 PM
1

All I can say is that it's what led me to make the changes I needed to make, I was a virgin at nineteen who'd never gone on a date. Now, I have a different reputation...
/r/TheRedPill18/03/17 08:58 PM
2

Yeah, you don't need most women to reciprocate interest though, you just have short interactions with people you don't click with and move on to the next to find the ones you do click with.
/r/seduction18/03/17 08:57 PM
1

Glad you liked it! Curious, are there any topics in particular you'd like to see an article written about?
/r/seduction18/03/17 08:54 PM
1

If you're on point a girl will never get bored of you. If you can close the deal in 30 minutes, do it, though. You just have to know how to take a step back if you're escalating too quickly for her. For me, it's usually 45 minutes to 3 hours. I'm self-publishing the book I'm releasing on the 23rd, planning to submit the next book to publishers though. Why do you ask?
/r/TheRedPill18/03/17 08:54 PM
1

Basically, but knowing how to write field reports is extremely important, most guys do it totally wrong. You need to be doing it to dispel your rationalizations while also reminding yourself of things you did well.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/17 08:51 PM
7

Firstly, when I was new, I thought a lot of the pickup lines I read were cringey, and when I said them, they did come off as pretty awkward. However, when I say those things now, they work well, cringe is mostly based on how you say something, not the content itself. Secondly, it's a contingency plan, it's not the ideal, the ideal is to have a free associating conversation that goes through a variety of topics. But, if you can't think of anything to say, interview style conversation can keep the…
/r/TheRedPill18/03/17 08:50 PM
2

Great! Let me know how it goes! And if you have any questions feel free to ask.
/r/seduction18/03/17 08:46 PM
1

Interview type talk is actually fine if you're in the right state of mind, but it's not supposed to be the ideal conversation, it's a crutch, something to say if you can't think of anything creative on the fly, that way you don't have to worry about running out of things to say. It's much better to have an average interview type of conversation, than no conversation at all!
/r/seduction18/03/17 08:46 PM
1

e book is being released first (on the 23rd) Physical book will be released roughly a month later.
/r/seduction18/03/17 08:44 PM
1

You've got yourself in quite the psychological trap! Honestly, any change is going to come down to writing effective field reports, every time I've made real progress I was writing good field reports consistently, it lets you see your rationalizations as bullshit and helps you let go of the mover time. You can make a point of practicing behaviors that a needy guy would never do, doing this acts like a crutch, after you get comfortable with these behaviors, non-needy behaviors will start to becom…
/r/seduction18/03/17 08:43 PM
2

Your correct, but we didn't evolve to show status with money or cars. Confidence is an honest signal for status, in tribal societies only high status males had the luxury of acting confident because if you were low status and acted confidently (by making a move on a woman for example) you would be ostracized or killed by the high-status males. It is about status, but women detect status most potently in behavior not in possessions.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/17 04:00 AM
1

Your opinion matters in that it gives me something to look for, I might not agree with your opinion, but I also might become aware of an obvious mistake I was making. Thanks for taking the time to write that out, it may prove to be very helpful.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/17 05:41 PM
1

Only the Sith think in absolutes
/r/TheRedPill16/03/17 05:37 PM
3

What specifically don't you like about my writing, could you elaborate? I am always interested in critical feedback.
/r/TheRedPill15/03/17 11:54 PM
1

First, a 10 is very subjective, not everyone's ideal is a model. And of course status helps for a number of reasons- and if you're specifically trying to date women who are paid for their appearance, it's not a bad idea to increase your own status, it will make it easier for you, absolutely. But is it necessary? No, not at all, every women will respond to emotional cues of high-status. Confidence is an honest signal for high status because in hunter-gatherer times, only high status men would be …
/r/TheRedPill15/03/17 11:54 PM
4

It often becomes a stumbling block, you're right. But I don't think it has to be, it depends on what seeing a 10 means to you, if it's a big deal, then you're fucked, if you see it as exciting, "I have to meet her!." It's fine. Conceptually not having labels would be great, but even if I don't say it out loud or put a number to it, I still know when I'm talking to a girl I'm particularly attracted to that she is unusually attractive. it's just human nature to make that judgment, so I don't know …
/r/TheRedPill15/03/17 07:43 PM
1

I could have qualified that with a (largely outside your control), because you're right, you can definitely make an impact on your appearance. There's no reason not to get a nice hair cut and buy some good clothes, it can help because it makes you look better and because you might feel better about your appearance which is reflected in your confidence.
/r/seduction15/03/17 05:45 PM
2

That's an entirely different subject. What your saying is 100% correct, it doesn't at all contradict the article which is about why men feel undeserving of physically attractive women and why we convince ourselves to try to fix ourselves with external factors that don't really matter (money etc.).
/r/seduction15/03/17 05:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter