TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Women-only museum becomes a toilet to keep men out

Flagg1991

May 7, 2024
332 upvotes
/r/MensRights

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd1wpegrnrxo

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Women-only museum becomes a toilet to keep men out
Author

Flagg1991

Upvotes 332
Comments 108
Date May 7, 2024 8:00 PM UTC
(2 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1cml2ui/womenonly_museum_becomes_a_toilet_to_keep_men_out/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/women-only-museum-becomes-a-toilet-to-keep-men-out.1517785
https://theredarchive.com/post/1517785
Top posts by Flagg1991

Bumble Changes its Policy Because Making the First Move is a "Burden"

627 upvotes
May 10, 2024
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]kkkan2020 227 points228 points229 points 2 years ago (31 children) | Copy Link

Yeah wouldnt it be illegal due to anti discrimination laws?

[–]Quiet-Invite-7540 129 points130 points131 points 2 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

yes the article literally says that she's going to make it a huge ladies restroom so men can't enter. Which while a good idea still won't work.

[–]MaxTheCatigator 178 points179 points180 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Simples, just identify as woman.

Beat them using their own toxic ideology.

[–]Final-Attempt95 37 points38 points39 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's the spirit.

[–]rabel111 57 points58 points59 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The regulatory requirements for toilets in public access buildings and residential homes is so strict, it is unlikely to be lawful.

Most likely, this entitled feminist thinks that hanging a sign saying 'women's toilet, no men allowed', makes the room a women only toilet. This is just a clarification of her perceived female privilege. A variation of 'believe all women', the hand maiden of 'women always get what they want', sister of 'women must be obeyed'.

[–]BettyLethal 21 points22 points23 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

...only if you're a man who does it. otherwise, bears...

[+]Fantastic_Ad_3022 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Are you stupid ? Men for hundreds of years have ALWAYS had they own clubs and lounges now that women have one men want to be apart of it ? Why can’t women have one little peace of solitude for themselves or how about men start their own men only museum.

[–]kkkan2020 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't know if you have noticed but mens clubs are no longer allowed. Any mens clubs have been open to women. So if women can have their own spaces but men aren't allowed that ..what would you call that?

[–]Fantastic_Ad_3022 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah open to women to work at the clubs not be part of it. They still exist trust me. They never went away

[+]Repulsive-Lie1 -110 points-109 points-108 points 2 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

That’s what the court decided.

In my opinion it would be reasonable to have certain times for women only, legally reasonable at least.

[–]rabel111 40 points41 points42 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No. The court already decided that that was unlawful discrimination. All of the lawful exceptions to the law were considered and rejected. They were just excluding men because they were sexist pigs.

[+]Repulsive-Lie1 -18 points-17 points-16 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I haven’t read the full details, only what is in the BBC article. I have seen similar cases where allowing only certain demographics in certain times is found to be proportional and legal by the courts, but of course, each case is measured on its own merit.

[–]Quiet-Invite-7540 17 points18 points19 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

your username sounds like a great 90s rock band

[–]d8ukrainians 8 points9 points10 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Your username sounds like you’re gonna flash someone in an alley lol :)

[–]InvasiveSpecies1738 5 points6 points7 points 2 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Then I should be allowed to not hire a single woman in my business

[–]Repulsive-Lie1 -1 points0 points1 point 2 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

It depends on the business and the reason for doing so.

[–]InvasiveSpecies1738 6 points7 points8 points 2 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Because I don’t want to, or don’t think they are competent enough, whatever. Why can there be women only spaces but then we have female quotas for businesses?

[+]Repulsive-Lie1 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

You can do that, a court might rule it illegal but only time will tell.

This museum can’t have a female only space, that’s what the article is about.

Does your business have quotas?

[–]InvasiveSpecies1738 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

In EU every business with over 250 employees has quotas now.

[+]Repulsive-Lie1 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

That’s not true. They’re required to record and publish the data but there is no prescription for quotas.

[–]InvasiveSpecies1738 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You think so?

[–]Repulsive-Lie1 -1 points0 points1 point 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Have you read that? It very much appears that you have not.

By 2026 companies of 250 employees of more will be required to have at least a 40% 60% gender split on their board or directors. And if they don’t have said split they must publish plan for how they will fix this. Hiring and promotion must still be based on merit, in-line with current law.

Read it before sharing it.

This only applies to board of director position.

[+]Repulsive-Lie1 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What you’re describing is positive discrimination in hiring and is much illegal in the EU unless you can prove your organisation needs it. EG, you run a charity for domestic abuse victims and you need staff of only one gender or EG you run a lesbian bar and your customers expect female bartenders.

[–]designerutah 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Why would it be reasonable? Legal is another issue.

[+]Repulsive-Lie1 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

“Legally reasonable”, can be reasoned to agree with law.

[–]designerutah 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You didn't justify the claim it was reasonable, please do. Why is it reasonable?

[+]Repulsive-Lie1 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That’s the thing with opinions, they don’t need to be justified, because they’re opinions.

[–]DifficultPapaya3038 184 points185 points186 points 2 years ago* (17 children) | Copy Link

🤔 I think there was some form of discrimination that was around 70 years ago that didn’t let certain looking people use fountains, bathrooms, classrooms or interact at all…. Are feminists really advocating for that again??!?!…..

Nah I must be tripping out on my crazy incel pills 😊😊😊😊 feminism is definitely not an evil cult

[–]Responsible-Trip5586 46 points47 points48 points 2 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

It’s only a matter of time before they have us working in the fields for zero pay lmao

[–]vegeta8300 37 points38 points39 points 2 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

They practically already do for many. Men are by far the majority of prison populations. Even when the same crime is looked at, women far less often face prison time. It's not zero pay, but 25cents an hour is pretty close. And you can't leave or you'll be shot. Now if it was just legit murderers and violent rapists, that'd be one thing. But there are men in prison for all sorts of non violent reasons that best be served in a better way.

[+]AdLonely891 -42 points-41 points-40 points 2 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

The majority of people in prison are in there because they're fucking psychos and are a danger to society. It has nothing to do with gender.

[–]vegeta8300 19 points20 points21 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Thats why I excluded murderers, rapists and other violent criminals. I talking people arrested for weed possession, or most all drug charges, and other nonviolent crimes. Did you not read my comment before you decided to comment?

[+]AdLonely891 -26 points-25 points-24 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes.

[–]InvasiveSpecies1738 5 points6 points7 points 2 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

While that is generally true, you have to keep in mind that statistically men get a lot harsher sentences for the same crime and women occasionally just get away with rape, murder and such without even doing time.

Don’t believe me? Just google “women {crime} no jail”. Try that with “rapes minor boy” or “stabs boyfriend” or “kills a child” I’m sure you’ll find plenty of stories.

[–]The_Better_Paradox 5 points6 points7 points 2 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Hey, when a women rapes a minor boy, it isn't called rape. The right term is "she had sex with the minor boy"

[–]InvasiveSpecies1738 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

And the the minor has to pay child support when he turns 18 💀

[–]The_Better_Paradox 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm pretty sure he doesn't need to be 18 to pay for child support.

[–]InvasiveSpecies1738 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Not sure if you’re joking or serious. Based on the cases I’ve read, victims were made to pay child support after turning 18, but given HOW FUCKING NUTS THIS IS I would totally believe that there could be a case where up to that point victims parents had to pay it.

[–]The_Better_Paradox 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

even if he was raped, when he was minor, he still had to pay all the child support.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/talking-about-trauma/201902/when-male-rape-victims-are-accountable-child-support?amp

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermesmann_v._Seyer - this happened first in 1933 but shiver me timbers, women have always been so oppressed.
Like, imagine asking a woman rape victim to hold accountability?
You'll be called mysogynistic then, and rightfully so.
But not misandrist and that's the double standard

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/louisiana-rape-custody-abelseth-barnes-b2136044.html - even if we ignore who was wrong, this gained more publicity when a women was forced to pay the supposed "rapist".

[–]KeiDgh1 8 points9 points10 points 2 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Tell this to BLM. Black people have the majority in prison, they commit more crimes than White people.

So, It is called racism, right? And that's a sexism to do this men-hating thing then

[+]AdLonely891 -5 points-4 points-3 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

What the fuck are you talking about? It has nothing to do with race or gender. Black people tend to commit more crimes because they are more likely to be some kind of poverty or fatherless home. But we aren't talking about racism.

[–]foxsheepgato 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It has nothing to do with race or gender.

yes, I believe that was the point he was trying to make. women get lenient sentences. men are automatically blamed in domestic violence situations. add to that the neglect of boys and men, fatherless homes and no wonder we have more men in prison. but if you just want to look at the numbers and validate your misandry, then the example with black men are fitting too. but that's of course taboo, unlike misandry.

[+]AdLonely891 -1 points0 points1 point 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lmao. Please quote what I have said that is "misandry'. Saying that most people in prison are criminals doesn't even have anything to do with gender and is factually correct.

[+]AdLonely891 -2 points-1 points0 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lmao, I can't believe I've actually just been downvoted for saying most people in prison are criminals. What the fuck do you think, everyone in prison is innocent and kind? Or is it just that I'm not blindly following your hivemind?

[–]Angryasfk 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Of course they are. They clearly have no issues with discrimination. They just want it to be their discrimination.

An example? They oppose black guys being shat on for being black. That’s “bad” you see. Treat them like s#it for being men? That’s “good”. The fact you’re discriminating against someone not for what they’ve done, but for factors beyond their control was never a problem for feminists - and likely SJWs over all.

[–]SarcasticallyCandour 56 points57 points58 points 2 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

But i thought blocking men from the museum "is the art". So its not really a toilet but a museum pretending to be a toilet in order to skirt the law. A court should be able to see its still a museum underneath so should be illegal.

[–]DrDalenQuaice 22 points23 points24 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Seems like they're inviting people to shit there

[–]Angryasfk 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Likely it’s full of s#it!

[–]rabel111 9 points10 points11 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Valarie Solanas most likely thought killing men was art. How did that work out?

[–]TheSoundOfAnarchy 44 points45 points46 points 2 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Hahah i commented on this, this morning and got banned !

Funny how that works. Like how can they not even think this is lunacy, lol .

Imagine let’s rage bait everyone until the only place they can live is on an island in the middle of nowhere-

[–]jessi387 12 points13 points14 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

They’d still get mad at us. “Where are there no women on hat island!”

[–]TheSoundOfAnarchy 7 points8 points9 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women. Let create and an island and make it “only women”. YASSSS QUEEEENNN.

Women, why are only women on this island!? Ugh, we can’t do anything without the Patriarchy telling us what to do!?

[–]pwishall 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

What sub?

[–]TheSoundOfAnarchy 12 points13 points14 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I think it was in feminism one or r women or something. One of the two, I am banned from TwoX last week😭😂

[–]pwishall 16 points17 points18 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's funny how so many of them will unironically you a "fragile man", yet ban you for the silliest things.

[–]TheSoundOfAnarchy 6 points7 points8 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It makes me laugh so much.

Imagine the only power they have is clicking a button that doesn’t even pertains to real life 😭

It’s like getting mad playing a game of Risk, because you are loosing and swiping the board onto the floor in a fit of rage 😭😅

[–]SnooBeans6591 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

feminism I suppose. But "feminism" is for everyone, feminism isn't man hating, feminism isn't a hate group

[–]jayjester 45 points46 points47 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

‘Reverse Misogyny’, they misspelled Misandry.

[–]Punder_man 28 points29 points30 points 2 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

So.. what i'm hearing is that they are acting in contempt of the court order by trying to claim this special ladies only area is now a woman's bathroom and because of that men can't come in...

I hope she gets slapped by the courts..

Also its ironic that they claim this to be a ladies area.. yet they have works by many MALE artists in this area...
You'd think they'd want to go full hog and only have art created by women in this space no?

The simple answer here is, if you want to actively discriminate against men, then charge men less..
If men are only able to see 80% of the art on display, they should only pay 80% of the price of admission...

But i'm sure in their minds they believe that not only should men be supportive of their decision to discriminate against them..
But i'm sure they would be happy trying to justify men having to pay more than women to view the museum.. just like that feminist cafe did which eventually went out of business..

If you want to highlight discrimination one group has suffered, the way to do that is NOT discriminating another group back..
Because all that does is start an endless cycle of "Well women were discriminated against so now we're discriminating against men!" followed by men saying "We were discriminated against by women, so we are justified in discriminating against women!" etc..

[–]Final-Attempt95 9 points10 points11 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

>>Also its ironic that they claim this to be a ladies area.. yet they have works by many MALE artists in this area...

That's fucking hilarious lol, we are gonna keep you out of the world that you created .

[–]Scarce12 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't think she's found in contempt of court (yet), she has been given order and says she has filed an appeal.

However, the tribunal member noted that some of the behaviour written in the newspapers of what she did would have triggered further orders and investigation if the member had seen it or if it intimidated the applicant - fortunately for her they were both online that day.

[–]mogaman28 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And one of them is Pablo Picasso. He wasn't the best example of an "ally".

[–]LAMGE2 81 points82 points83 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

What an arrogant bitch

[–]Two_n_dun 35 points36 points37 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I believe the word you’re looking for is “half-witted”

This dipshit is going to have to install all necessary infrastructure for it to legitimately be considered a restroom.

Edit: the real beauty of it is that the construction work will be done by… men. So you’re going to fork out a shitload of money to outfit your ridiculous space to a company… likely owned by a man.

Sheesh. Really making a stance.

[–]StaysAwakeAllWeek 10 points11 points12 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She's going to fork out for men to build her a giant toilet only to be sued by a man and his likely male lawyer, and when she loses the likely male judge will force her to pay up and let men in anyway

[–]Grand-Juggernaut6937 16 points17 points18 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If this works I’m going to build a gym that’s just one giant men’s restroom

[–]SnooBeans6591 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Put a toilet in the corner, it can even be "temporarily out of order".

I'm wondering, what's prohibiting a company to use this to hire only men? If the judge accepted this, that would create a very unhealthy precedent.

[–]Kvltizt 42 points43 points44 points 2 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Hope this shit is shut down and she's fined a hefty price. Misandrist whore

[+]MozartFan5 -16 points-15 points-14 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Calling her a "whore" is not helping.

[–]Fantastic-Active9477 -1 points0 points1 point 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She is a whore tho..

[–]BowtiepastaMasta 10 points11 points12 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The audacity

[–]weatherinfo 10 points11 points12 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

“It’s the greatest toilet, and men won’t be allowed to see it.”

… Gender equality anyone?

[+]AdLonely891 -9 points-8 points-7 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

There is no way bro is mad about not being able to see a literal feminist toilet 💀

[–]weatherinfo 9 points10 points11 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, I wouldn’t care to head in, but there are clearly other men that would and I feel bad for them. This is not gender equality

[–]Scarce12 9 points10 points11 points 2 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Cameras in a rest room will be a problem.     She also says she's going to change it into a church:

   https://mona.net.au/blog/

 . I am wondering if she could be ruled as being vexatious, she needs to be careful and stop treating it as a joke. 

[–]p3ngwin 9 points10 points11 points 2 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

Tasmania's Museum of Old and New Art appealed on Tuesday to reverse the ruling, arguing it took "too narrow a view on women's historical and ongoing societal disadvantage" and how the Ladies Lounge can "promote equal opportunity".

How is closing a door to half a population creating an "equal opportunity" ?

The lounge, which contains some of the museum's most-acclaimed works - from Picasso to Sidney Nolan - has been closed to the public since the court's order.

So it has nothing to do with equality, when you're not exclusively showing women's works (again not sure why that wouldn't mean you want men to also appreciate them!?), but here you're showing/appropriating MEN'S works, then excluding MEN from viewing their own gender's works ??

and a comment from the r/news submission:

Well at least the artist involved is transparent:

Kaechele underscored her point with the belief that women “deserve both equal rights and special privileges in the form of unequal rights,” as reparations for historical discrimination, “for a minimum of 300 years.”

From her Instagram "Men need to be discriminated against"

[–]Punder_man 6 points7 points8 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

JFC... So, shes going to fix sexism and discrimination by being sexist and discriminatory towards men?
Men who are NOT the men who oppressed / discriminated against women in the past...
Nope, does not matter because according her her ALL men must share in / feel collective guilt for the crimes committed by men who are no longer alive against women who are no longer alive..

Not only that but the fact that she feels that at minimum men should be discriminated for 300 years is very telling..

This woman needs a lot of help to deal with her issues clearly..

[–]Final-Attempt95 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Wait they have Picasso ? wth,i thought this was some small time women's arts museum. Is it Publicly owned or Private ?

[–]p3ngwin 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

no idea, but apparently this isn't a 100% women's artwork exhibit, they have works by male artists, and have the gall to gatekeep them only for women's viewing under the guise to "promote equal opportunity" o.O

Can you imagine a men's artworks exhibit, containing women's works, blocking women from attending under the guise of "equality!" lol

[–]Billmacia 9 points10 points11 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Kaechele said in Australian media reports.

"A museum tried reverse misogyny. Now a man is suing"

Isn't it just call....misandry

That what happen when you let a gender get away without punishment and accountability, they act so superior and live in an other reality.

Australia really has a problem of deep rooted misandry.

[–]regarding_my_person 20 points21 points22 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The chick wants it to be for the world but at the same time not allowing 50.4% of it ? I want whatever she’s on frfr

[–]MannerNo7000 14 points15 points16 points 2 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Of course it’s my shit country

[–]MozartFan5 8 points9 points10 points 2 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Yup Australia sucks. With all of the misandry against men and boys and the extreme racism and apathy towards Aboriginal Australians I have come to despise mainstream Australian society. I guess that's what happens when you try to create a settler colonial society consisting of convicts and their descendants. 

[–]MannerNo7000 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Australia was so good previously. We still have a super quality of life and is very safe.

Just seems to intent on fucking up what’s been a largely successful project.

[–]SnooBeans6591 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean, in that case your countries judge took the right decisions (so far)

[–]Current_Finding_4066 9 points10 points11 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A gold digger with an attitude issues.

[–]Dxslayer3714 7 points8 points9 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You know the way around this is to simply identify as a female and if she tried to bar you just claim she's transphobic.

Use there own tricks against them in my opinion.

[–]drmode2000 8 points9 points10 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I am glad they sued and won

[–]Scarce12 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't think he sued.   I think what happened is he lodged a complaint under the anti-discrimination act, and the minister referred it to the Administrative tribunal and it followed from there. 

 He appeared to have prepared his arguments very well, and I think he took them by surprise.  

I suspect he's a practising barrister or solicitor at least. He received alot of hate from Reddit, and the admins did nothing, they should take heed.

[–]redefinedsoul 7 points8 points9 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Can you imagine what would happen if men tried to pull this kind of shit? The fucking boy scouts are no longer a thing because women demanded their girls be allowed in (but boys are NOT allowed in the brownies because that's a safe space for girls).. so I can't even imagine the outcry for something like this

[–]MegaManZer0 12 points13 points14 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Identify as woman, enter museum, take shit on floor? It's a toilet, right?

[–]Royal_IDunno 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just like that feminist cafe where they charged men extra simply for being men, this too will only end in the place being shutdown due to lack of customers and not enough money coming through.

[–]NeoKlang 6 points7 points8 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Never underestimate the stewfeedity of women

[–]ButWhatOfGlen 5 points6 points7 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Buahahaha... Identity as a woman, enter, drop a steaming deuce on the floor, exit.

[–]UNR2 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

At my school the only men’s room is down by the gym. Between the spec Ed department and women making the men’s rooms “wo”men’s rooms it’s the only place left for us.

[–]Final-Attempt95 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Are they gonna display arts made by men ? that would be hilarious lol

[–]MozartFan5 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Its especially worse when you consider the fact that Tasmania was once inhabited by Aboriginal men and women for thousands of years before whote European Australians areived and committed genocide against them and byt the turn of the 20th century there were no full-blooded indigenous Tasmanians left. They are going to ban men of Aboriginal Australian descdnt on their own ancestral homelands that were stoldn from their ancestors because of the genocidal actions of the ancestors of White Australian women but allow White Asitralian women to enter this space? That is so messed up. White Female Settler Colonial Discrimination at its finest. Banning indigenous men from enetering certain parts of their own ancestral homelands after committing genocide against them and oppressing them for centuries. 

[–]Financial_Economy_11 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Imagine a male only lounge where women are allowed in every sunday to cook and make cups of tea for the men. Feminists would be screaming. If women get away with the reverse of this, that sounds like M I S A N D R Y

[–]AdIllustrious6191 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So, who exactly is going to carry to and install the toilet in the ladies' lounge?

[–]El_Psy_Congroo4477 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Tell them you identify as a woman.

[–]Pretend-Assumption-9 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If i identify as a woman will i still be denied???

[–]Enough-Staff-2976 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We need more masculine presenting gay women...he'll show them.

[–]FactorySupervisor 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nah this world is cooked

[–]DeddestNash 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Honestly it's a weird one.

When I look at the MONA website there's no drabbled about feminism blah blah blah. Just ladies only eventing, which I don't think is bad. Supposedly there's some picasso artworks installed due to him attending such parties before (says in the description that he attended the curators grand mothers parties or something, idk how true though), which actually kinda defeats any feminist driven purpose given the history of picasso, not something to have tea over at least.

Kinda sucks to withhold the art like that, wouldn't mind if it swapped in and out, like museums frequently do.

But it would be nice for a male only as well implemented (and a lot more fair), I actually think that the larger picture of both is a bit more artsy driven. .

But from the website it doesn't look like men will be missing out on much to be honest. I think that the mass amount of ladies spaces and lesser male spaces is the general reason why we don't like it. But had we have equal that, the reasons for it are quite tame, although that's just my opinion.

When I first read it, it gave the impression of withholding a few exhibits or something, but that doesn't seem to be the case.

[–]antsypantsy995 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Your Honour we're allowed to discriminate against men because it's just a meme."

"Your Honour we're trying to provide a service to a historically excluded and underserved section of society because women weren't allowed in bars."

"Your Honour, being excluded IS the artwork."

"Your Honour, it's not even an art museum, it's just a toilet. Are you saying men should be allowed in women's toilets?" <---------- YOU ARE HERE

[+]Fantastic_Ad_3022 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women can’t have shit without men making it about them or getting offended. So fucking what women what their own museum who exactly is that hurting ? It’s basically like women tea time/parties. Men have golf, cigar lounges, secret clubs and PLENTY of spaces just for men go there. Hitters for example that’s a restaurant targeted for male customers you don’t see any restaurants with topless men in shape as a waiter anywhere do you ?

[–]BoeingA320neo-9 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What happens when someone identifies a woman for the day and wants to actually use the toilet the so called ladies lounge

[–]Ptoney1 -5 points-4 points-3 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This type of bullshit is giving me Israel vibes.

It’s holocaust Remembrance Day! We’re going to remember our misery by bombing the fuck out of starving people in Gaza

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter