The post "My Mom is Abusive" is flaired as a 'bluepill example'. Here, the RedPill seems to frame this as men being too "bluepilled/beta" (though I don't think this would be a consistent opinion, or the official opinion).

My mom is hyper-vigilant and accusatorial (my dad never blames my mom for anything) and her anger ranges from nagging to full out yelling over dinner about some perceived slight.

...

If it was the other way around, and my dad was constantly nit-picking about ridiculous crap and giving my mom shit daily, I probably would have labeled it as "abuse" without hesitation, so TRP did provide a wake up call.

And this guy describes himself as "cucked" in his post titled "I was cucked for 4 years. 24 years old male". I only skim-read it tbf but I don't see a case of actual cucking?

Until one day she started getting more and more upset when i was talking to other girls, so i slowly decreased it. until she was my only girl in the world. All i had was her, Work and 1 dog with her.

...

She controlled me like a puppy! Then she breaks up with me, Tells all her female friends that i have Schizophrenia and Dissociation Identity Disorder, She tried to get some people to cut me off their lives.

So the questions are:

1) Do RedPillers believe that women can be abusive?

2) Why is it the man's "fault", in these examples at least?

3) To what extent can women be abusive? Is it typically just emotional, or more than that?

4) How can men vet against this?

5) If you believe that women who have abusive exes have them as a result of "poor mate selection that they should hold themselves accountable for", do you extend that to the men who face this in their LTRs/Marriages?