Feminist writes article about cock carousel filled with red pill truths

Stayinghereforreal · 2016-02-15T20:23:04+00:00

This is why agitating for economic change, like the institution of a guaranteed minimum income, should be one of feminism’s core projects

So goddam stupid, this one. Um, so, when all those GUYS decide to just play Xbox, wank it, and smoke pot, because a check shows up every month sufficient to cover electric, rent, pot, and porn, who is left to pay the bills, dear? Hmm?

This woman's first instinct is to say that men will get checks too, because equality. But when it becomes apparent that guys, like women, will be just fine with a drop-out-fast-and-still-get-paid lifestyle (and do off the books work for extra cash, yuk yuk), the whole system goes ker-splat. At that point, of course, she would insist that only women should get the gimme dat payments, because blah blah blah. I am sure there is some explanation why women get to malinger, while men cannot. Oh, look, right on cue....

The global movement against welfare affects women more than any other group, since women do the majority of caring labour,

NightwingTRP · 2016-02-15T22:06:43+00:00

*women would rather be a cat lady then with a beta

False. The only thing worse for women than being a woman with a low value man is being a woman with no man at all. This entire piece is Laura thingy trying to convince herself that she hasn't got everything completely wrong. She's not bothered that she's giving out bad advice to other women that will cause misery. She needs to hamster publically in order to follow her fee fees.

There is no such thing as a WGTOW movement and there never will be due to the very nature of women.

mustang_mike · 2016-02-15T20:55:12+00:00

It's written by Laurie Penny. She complains about her relationship problems, but is it any wonder that such a mousey, dyke haired, militantly anti-male woman has a hard time finding or keeping good men? Who wants to put up with all that baggage for (probably boring) pussy?

Of course she's advocating for women being single. She's framing her personal failures as a good thing, and is trying to convince herself (and other women) that they're better off without men. Notice how it's never the attractive women who are writing this misandrist dribble? Color me unsurprised...

BREAKING: Feminist lacks self awareness! And water is... wet? These stories and more at 11...

Rommel0502 · 2016-02-16T00:06:57+00:00

Destruction of the family unit and subsequent increased dependence on the govt is core to ever more govt control and less freedom.

If no one needs their govt fix, then govt becomes an economic afterthought. The last thing the government wants is to become no longer necessary.

Strong family units, entrepreneurial mindsets, numerous alpha males, independent private financial households, private ownership of firearms. All of these things threaten the ever increasing size and power the government has over us, so it should come as no surprise that most of our new policies and "reforms" are targeted at their destruction. Feminism is one of the most powerful tools to that end.

trp_angry_dwarf · 2016-02-16T01:50:53+00:00

Austerity and anti-welfarism are an attack on women’s independence under capitalism. This is why agitating for economic change, like the institution of a guaranteed minimum income, should be one of feminism’s core projects

I had to read that 5 times to make sure I wasn't having a stroke. Then I got so angry I thought I was going to have a stroke.

What the fucking fuck? I can't believe they actually came out with it. The first rule of fight club is YOU DON'T TALK ABOUT FIGHT CLUB. Here she is, just openly expressing the long term strategy. Out in the open. I think the feminazis might put out a contract on her soon.

Sawagurumi · 2016-02-15T19:41:13+00:00

The trouble with the whole beta bux dynamic, is that the woman has to give something in return. That can't be right, she is entitled to have fun, not contribute to a relationship by actually doing what men want (and unlike with women, men are easy to please: belly full and balls empty sums it up). So, get the bux via Daddy Government means she is entitled to that money, while giving back nothing. What's not to like?

SilentAlpha · 2016-02-16T00:27:44+00:00

The problem is that she fundamentally misunderstands that men are inherently wired to want to have 'adventure' with their wife in the way that they otherwise can't when unmarried. That being a need for "erotic love". That which provides comfort, security and sexuality in a mixture that fulfills all of a mans core needs (and ultimately thereby a woman's).

This notion being put forth in the article above is always disproven when both men and women find themselves miserable and unhappy when it becomes apparent that compartmentalizing ones life never results in positive emotional and psychological outcomes later in life when both spouses, but especially men, look to their wives for carnal passion and feminine comfort.

When a woman has wild sexual adventures apart from her husband she ends up marrying she experiences a corruption of conscience which doesn't easily correct itself by the time she marries. Thus, a lot of the adventure that men crave (sexually speaking) many wives who have promiscuous pasts are reluctant to duplicate due to shame/guilt issues associated with her past behavior.

Benny757 · 2016-02-16T02:16:58+00:00

This is another great post and perfect example of one of the core lessons from TRP. Men, take back YOURSELVES! The feminist movement wants a free ride, and someone else to pay for it. Hey, some women work really hard, and produce very much. Many are really cool. But we as men do not need sex when it is a weapon held against us.

We step back.......and we walk away.

We must all be ready to ask ourselves: "Can I step back, walk away, and go live for myself, and take care of myself, and my children, if I have them."

Reality, and actually thinking about it and coming to terms with it are very elusive things. But to provide for ourselves as men, we must be positively productive. We must do, we must be, we must be shrewd, we must be savvy, we must engage, we must own our situation, we must navigate the correct path, and it must be a vicious battle to stay on top.

Reality requires suffering, sadness, great battles, and constant hurdles for the majority of us. But we as men must lead. Nature made us to lead. Nature abhors the weak. Gotta be strong NOW. Not one second later. Nature plays for keeps.

We worry that our women will love us, as we were in the womb? All nice and cuddly? Where in nature is that found except in babies? No, nature just is, and the process of the fight begins. As men, we can't not fight.

True, we can drop out, be bums, live in basements, go skid row, become addicted, kill someone. All lead to shortened lives where self-actualization is destroyed.

And back to reality, the god we call Nature. "It" does not give a fuck about us. Reality check here. It doesn't give a fuck about WOMEN, men, children, babies, ants, worms or anything else. The beginning of life leads to the process of death, destruction, and in biologically pleasant conditions.....possible rebirth.

Now feminists want a state sponsored system to replace nature, and natural selection. Just how will that fair for our children and next generations? It will not. How could it.

So, my morale to the story. Men, be concerned about taking care of yourselves with no net, become fiercely independent and libertarian. Guard your natural ability to lead and master, and guard your masculinity like your very lives depend upon it.

The benefits will immediately benefit you, but will also benefit all of us, and our future generations.

No betas, no welfare checks.

MattyAnon · 2016-02-15T21:26:07+00:00

when I became a real person to them

When I wanted them to do stuff for me.

men are especially inclined to see love as something they should receive without expending effort.

Whereas women are contributing massive efforts to make "love" work? Which planet is she from again, because human females aren't a part of this equation. Sorry love, complaining to your friends about how the man you've chosen isn't the man you want does not count as "working".

since women do the majority of caring labour

Ah... but independent woman is the equal of man. If she chooses nursing or low level teaching, or some other "caring" profession she's doing it for economic reasons.

And if we allow that women are not the equal of men, then we should also allow that they are not entitled to the same power, resources, status, etc.

Saying "women paid for by the government" means "paid for by (male) taxpayers".

feminism is a movement to get a beta provider with having to actually be with one / women want to replace betas with a welfare check

There is also an element of having a job instead of being with a beta, for as long as possible. Hence the transition to a delayed marriage for having children, later in life (hence around 30, when that biological clock really starts a-ticking).

trway14 · 2016-02-16T10:18:46+00:00

This article shows the hamstering of a girl who simultaneously holds on to two beliefs that are clearly incompatible - and instead of sacrificing one of the two beliefs, she chooses to sacrifice rationality.

Belief 1 is the precious equality shtick. Belief 2 is her subconscious secretly holding on to female hypergamy and entitlement: despite all the equality blahblah, she still cannot let go of that deep craving for a man taller than her, more assertive and confident than her, etc. - and for him to take the driver's seat in the relationship.

Now what do you do when you really want a guy to carry most of the weight in the relationship, but you also want to hold on to your ideas of "equality"? Exactly: you overvalue everything you do and are, and undervalue everything he does and is, so that the scales end up showing balance. Doesn't matter that the scales are crooked.

This is how you get girls that go apeshit when their boyfriend only got them a card for Valentine's day and nothing else. When asked "and what exactly did YOU do for him", they say "well I put up with him and emotionally support him".

Overvaluing her contributions, undervaluing his - conclusion: he is a lazy manchild and I deserve better. While in reality what her subconscious is saying, is: because I'm a girl I deserve a man who is better than me and who puts in more effort than me. She just translates that to something compatible with the "equality" narrative.

It doesn't exactly help that she can get sex with Chads easily, and thus believes her market value to be higher than it really is when it comes to relationships.

men are especially inclined to see love as something they should receive without expending effort. More often than not they do not want to do the work that love demands

No acknowledgement that the expectations and pressures in the dating game are higher for men in the first place. No acknowledgement that for all those Chads she fucked, she had to do nothing except be available while they wouldn't have gotten laid if they weren't so eloquent, ripped, charismatic and successful. Why no acknowledgement? Because she has to keep all of that information out of her conscious mind, in order to avoid cognitive dissonance. She actually, genuinely believes that men can get love without doing any work.

In other words, it's the modern feminine imperative: all expectations on women are oppression and patriarchy, while all expectations on men are just part of not-being-a-manchild and really don't count as pressure. She tries to enforce the narrative by shaming men who don't follow that script. Too bad for her that all the quality men are just going to walk away. No amount of manipulation can beat the free market.

Which is why she's desperately hamstering:

What I’m trying to ~~say~~ convince myself of is that there are a lot of things that are much worse than being single under modern patriarchy.

catacamas · 2016-02-15T22:55:07+00:00

women want to replace betas with a welfare check

Yup, and this is also effectively state-mandated cuckoldry, i.e. this would allow her to have Chad's baby, while forcing all the beta bux's to pay for it through taxation.

Feminist is really a fascist cult.

This is the ultimate entitlement ... make men into slaves for women.

I have spent most of my twenties single, sometimes by choice ... I spent quite a lot of time being sad about that, even though my life was full of friends, fulfilling work, interesting lovers and overseas adventures. Looking back, though, staying single was probably the best decision I made, in terms of my career

Right. One common characteristic of cults is they try isolate their victims from their traditional support base (e.g. family and friends) to make them more vulnerable (as the cult steps in to fulfill that need for support) ... in the case of feminism, they encourage women to be all "I don't need a man" and they break down that 'traditional' role of a man being a woman's primary support base - that leaves women more vulnerable and lonely (since most don't really like being single, despite all the hamstering to the contrary), and so they fall more easily into the cult, as the cult offers them a sense of mutual comfort and emotional validation.

T0000009 · 2016-02-16T05:50:47+00:00

wasting years in succession on lacklustre, unappreciative, boring child-men

WOW...

I... I... Got nothing...

Hotblack_Desiato_ · 2016-02-16T03:38:53+00:00

You know, at first, I liked this woman. She starts out saying "it's better to be true to yourself than to compromise yourself for nookie." I'm sure we can all agree with this.

Then she dives into the "patriarchy" horseshit.

And then you see something REALLY interesting:

For those of us who mostly or exclusively date the so-called “opposite” gender, romantic love really can be a battlefield. It’s where politics play out intimately and, often, painfully. We’re not supposed to acknowledge that love is political. But how can it be otherwise?

This is one of those times where you see the the true ideological underpinnings of feminism. This mode of thinking is distinctly and unmistakably Marxist/Maoist. To Marxists, everything is political. Nothing in that worldview can be separated from politics. I could go on for a year, but if you study your Marx and Mao, you will recognize a lot of it, having seen its descendants in the form of feminism.

TheRabbitTunnel · 2016-02-16T02:17:57+00:00

Men are especially inclined to see love as something they should receive without expending effort. More often than not they do not want to do the work that love demands

Psychological projection - a defense mechanism people subconsciously employ in order to cope with difficult feelings or emotions. Psychological projection involves projecting undesirable feelings or emotions onto someone else, rather than admitting to or dealing with the unwanted feelings.

Replace the word "men" with "women", make much more sense?

MakeEmSayAyy · 2016-02-16T11:35:07+00:00

Women should get paid to exist!!

Meanwhile you aren't even fucking replacing the birth rate, because you can't resist fucking men over to get paid so much so that the birth rate is less than replacement.

PantsonFire1234 · 2016-02-16T13:40:30+00:00

This woman just sounds bitter.

CopperFox3c · 2016-02-15T20:42:10+00:00

Ugh, the irony of so-called progressive "liberals" agitating for basic income (i.e. "guaranteed minimum income") rather than true free markets that are designed to align individual incentives with those of the greater good. Rather than empowering individuals, they want to control the markets to benefit certain groups over others. As authoritarian as it gets.

It is the Doctrine of the Weak ... a perversion of power. Anti-individualism. Anti-free markets. Anti-free speech. Anti-due process.

Just another example of how progressives are NOT really liberals. Feminists, SJWs, and the like ... let the extremists in your midst run amok, and things are sure to go to hell.

Adam Smith and John Locke are surely rolling in their graves ...

muxler · 2016-02-15T23:24:35+00:00

Uh, archive.is link isn't needed?

Rush-into-the-fray · 2016-02-16T00:38:00+00:00

Three words for her. Join a commune.

jamest0001 · 2016-02-16T14:56:15+00:00

Laurie penny is an embarrassing childish British feminist who looks like a fat 12 year old boy. Would take what she says with a pinch of salt

boredagain_ · 2016-02-16T01:25:16+00:00

Interesting story: I used to date a woman-child that is exactly how the author describes it except with the sexes reversed. Feminists seem to think only men can be shitty people. It's no wonder less and less people identify as feminists every year.

Title	Feminist writes article about cock carousel filled with red pill truths
Author	scarletspider3
Upvotes	101
Comments	147
Date	February 15, 2016 7:22 PM UTC (10 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/45y5q6/feminist_writes_article_about_cock_carousel/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/feminist-writes-article-about-cock-carousel-filled.56272 https://theredarchive.com/post/56272

Comments