TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Man complains of ex-wife's mental illness. Judge sides with mother in custody case and now homicide ruled in death of son. When will this end?

Comcast_Lobbyist

June 30, 2015
695 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/Death-of-Charles-County-Toddler-Found-Being-Pushed-in-Swing-Ruled-Homicide-311005961.html?
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Man complains of ex-wife's mental illness. Judge sides with mother in custody case and now homicide ruled in death of son. When will this end?
Author

Comcast_Lobbyist

Upvotes 695
Comments 110
Date June 30, 2015 8:43 PM UTC
(11 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3bobpu/man_complains_of_exwifes_mental_illness_judge/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/man-complains-of-ex-wifes-mental-illness-judge.976410
https://theredarchive.com/post/976410

Comments

[–]HORSEBLUES 138 points139 points140 points 11 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link

I heard another story about a woman who was PROVEN to have killed her husband, got out of jail with a legal loophole, got custody of the child, and then murdered the child.

[–]haloempty 91 points92 points93 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Dear Zachary, that's the name of the documentary about this. It's an intense film

[–]SigmundFloyd76 12 points13 points14 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hey that happened where I live. I remember it clearly. Mostly I remember that everybody knew what was coming, nobody was really surprised when Shirley Turner and the toddler were found dead.

The boys paternal grandfather had gone public and had done a good job in demonstrating the woman was a murderer. Ironically, it was surely the pressure created by the media attention that forced her into that last desperate act. It became adversarial between Turner and the grandparents and I guess she decided if she wasn't going to win, than nobody would.

[+][deleted] 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]ruffykunn 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Only on DVD though, not via streaming.

[–]bravado 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Still messes me up just thinking about it, years after seeing it. I don't think I could ever see it a second time.

[–]Bwhitty23 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Is it as shocking as like the first time you see Jesus camp? I hear it is an intense movie that will piss you off. I think most people have to be in that state of mind to want to be pissed off.

[–]bravado 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, in Jesus camp you just hate everybody in the story. Dear Zachary is just non-stop sadness and rage at 'the system'.

[–]DoItLive247 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

It is on Amazon Prime. http://www.amazon.com/Dear-Zachary-Letter-About-Father/dp/B00MF5OE1Y/ref=sr_1_1?s=instant-video&ie=UTF8&qid=1435767031&sr=1-1&keywords=dear+zachary

[–]Mrmojoman0 12 points13 points14 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

reminds me of this attempted hiring of a hitman

note how she says she wasn't doing it for abuse or anything, it just needed to be done.

she claimed abuse, and she was let go, and the charges cannot be reopened.

[–]MyAfricanChild 11 points12 points13 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If you could find that link, it would be interesting to have a read over.

[–]RusskiEnigma 11 points12 points13 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Dear Zachary. Not for the feint of heart. Girlfriend (at the time) broke down, after she went home, I cried like a bitch too. What a film.

[–]va3zai 10 points11 points12 points 11 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Any chance of a source in this?

[–]throwthetrash15 19 points20 points21 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

the film is dear zachary.

[–]double-happiness 13 points14 points15 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

In jail, Turner wrote to a judge and, contrary to normal legal procedure, received advice on how to appeal her arrest and imprisonment. Turner was later released by a Newfoundland judge, Gale Welsh, who — despite what the film presents as ample evidence that Turner was psychologically disturbed — felt she did not pose a threat to society in general. [source]

/r/PussyPass

[–]SigmundFloyd76 10 points11 points12 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This right here.

I live in the city where this happened. If she had been a man, they would never had let her out into daylight.

[+][deleted] -72 points-71 points-70 points 11 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Nope lol.

Not that I don't doubt that some story like this exists, "I heard a story" just screams BS.

[–][deleted] 39 points40 points41 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It's actually a very famous case. There's a documentary about it and everything. It's called Dear Zachary, you can check it out - but it's quite gut-wrenching.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Sounds gut wrenching. Is it on Netflix?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Unfortunately no :/

[–]throwthetrash15 17 points18 points19 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

the film is dear zachary.

[+]cynicalsimon -11 points-10 points-9 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

GTFO .you don't belong on this subreddit

[+][deleted] 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There's a huge difference between asking for sources and screaming 'THAT HAPPENED!'.

Unless you're autistic or something.

[+][deleted] -33 points-32 points-31 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

As if your opinion matters at all.

I've been active on this subreddit for longer than your account has been open. Go fuck yourself.

It's especially rich coming from someone who thinks "traps" should be slaughtered.

These should be the only genders. Gay,straight, bi, trap Thats it.( however i do count traps as things that should be slaughtered tbh)

And who, apparently, thinks that those are genders and not sexual identities.

[–]Palpetinus 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Do I get upvotes now if I say that I disagree?

[–][deleted] -5 points-4 points-3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Probably. This subreddit is just as bad at brigading as the feminist subreddits. Most likely a product of the emotionally charged subject matter.

[–]cuteman 93 points94 points95 points 11 years ago* (13 children) | Copy Link

Do family court judges all get together and chant this mantra every morning?

"Men are wallets, not fathers."

[–][deleted] 38 points39 points40 points 11 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

It absolutely feels like it. I am currently battling my (ex)wife for custody of our 2.5 year old son. From the second we got into that court room it was all about team mom. I was shocked at the speed in which it went south for me. Not only were the financial particulars not taken into consideration I don't even think they were looked at. It doesn't matter that see left me fighting for my life in debt, or that she lives with her affluent parents. I'm just a goose that gives golden eggs.

[–]leftajar 27 points28 points29 points 11 years ago* (10 children) | Copy Link

State custody offices receive funds from the federal gov for every support order issued. There's actually a financial incentive to screw over fathers.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is heart breaking

[–]garrettgs297 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Sorry, not denying it, but I had never heard of this until now. Do you have evidence of this being the case?

[–]leftajar 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No worries; you're right to ask for proof.

Here's a post I made on this sub awhile ago, it contains the link.

[–]snobocracy 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Stop downvoting this man and give him proof!
If noone does, I will later when I have time.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Because this has been federal law for 20 years. He could very easily find this proof for himself spending a minute or two on google.

[–]snobocracy 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I just searchex "divorce courts receive funding based on child support judgments" and "divorce courts perverse incentives" and came up blank.

I have heard the claim before and I dont doubt it, but come on people. This is a "mens rights activist" subreddit. We should be more active in spreading facts; not just telling people to google stuff for themselves.

[–]Lhtfoot 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As far as I know, the Federal gov't doesn't give them money for ordering child-support... It's more like this. I was giving the mother of my child $4-500/mo voluntarily. She goes and files for welfare/food-stamps/etc, anyway. I get ordered to pay $628/mo in child-support. (The state comes after you then, not the mother). The mother only receives about $400 of this from the state. The state keeps the rest... Can someone, ANYONE, explain to me how this is in the best interests of our child for the state to take $200+/mo out of my child's mouth, when I was already supporting my child voluntarily??? (I moved across the country and sacrificed everything to be here for my child). Now my child is getting less from me and I am being put in a financial-pinch... but the state gets a nice cut every month, don't they? Fuck the Child-Support system. I'm a great-father and this system is aimed at punishing me.

[+]SigmundFloyd76 -9 points-8 points-7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

/r/MensRights

[+]SigmundFloyd76 -6 points-5 points-4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

/r/MensRights

[–]Lhtfoot 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

YES!!!

[–][deleted] 27 points28 points29 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It will never end - because nobody gives a shit about children or fathers - only mother's pocket books.

Disagree? Look at the statutes. There are no mechanisms in place to safeguard children and their rights to have both parents be a part of their lives. There are no mandatory fitness tests in contested custody. There is however a giant bureaucracy in place to make sure women get their checks. That's where the priority is.

Judges follow the statutes and in this case the Judge protected the mother's financial interests over all other considerations, because that's what a judge is tasked to do by the laws that are written in the books.

Fathers aren't important. The lives of children aren't important. All that matters is that the mother gets paid. Nobody should be shocked at this occurrence. This is a direct reflection of the laws that govern civil family concerns.

[–]Lhtfoot 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There is however a giant bureaucracy in place to make sure women get their checks. That's where the priority is.

It has nothing to do with the woman getting her check... It's about the state getting THEIR check! Their cut!

More than 1.82 Billion dollars was collected in child-support revenue by the state of NY in 2012 alone. This is a racket! There is monetary incentive for members of the Child Support Enforcement Agency Offices' to hit you for child-support. These members include the judge/magistrate, the guardian ad litem, the county-court, etc. They all get a cut, IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF OUR CHILDREN???

[–]Alarid 23 points24 points25 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

"It's just how women are". That is how society views mental illness in women. And when somebody has the initiative to stand up, and say something is wrong, they are labeled a misogynist.

It isn't until something regrettable happens that we start to give a shit.

[–]baskandpurr[🍰] 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There was a time when feminist would claim that women being mentally fragile was sexism. Now they actively reinforce the idea at every opportunity. Except when a older white academic says it, then its offensive and he should be fired immediately.

[–]Bluebird_North 44 points45 points46 points 11 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

This will end when judges are found personally liable for negligent decisions. Nothing makes someone do their job like the prospect of losing their entire wealth.

Please, lawyers. Sue this judge.

[–]somnambulator 15 points16 points17 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I totally agree. If a judge makes a personal decision (not a jury based decision) they should be liable.

This should also extent to parole boards. They are anonymous pen pushers that make decisions affecting the lives of others. And when they get it wrong, there is no accountability.

In any profession it's easy to make decisions if there is no accountability.

[–]RedditorJemi 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There are probably a few (like maybe 100 or more) judges in this country who are particularly agregious, and these few judges should be found out and their names and decisions made very public - and disbarment should be called for. This would pressure the less agregious judges - and if it's not enough, then wash, rinse, and repeat in a few years.

[+][deleted] 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]wisty 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Deepfreeze?

[–]AppropriateTouching 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

That's ridiculous. If judges fear prosecusion or law suits then they will only rule in a way that benefits them. That's why they're immune to litigation. That system would be much much worse than what we have now. Sure some judges make bad decisions right now but if that reasoning was in place most would. As it is right now most judges make good calls and you only hear about the few who don't since the good ones don't make good news.

[–]Bluebird_North 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Family Court decisions are not public. It's a closed door court. There are RICO cases pending and corruption cases.

I thought no you are wrong. My lawyer agrees with you. I believe he is wrong. Hmmm. Are you a lawyer?

[+][deleted] 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]percocet_20 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Some judges just want the title and the power, it genuinely sickens me.

[–]bsutansalt 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's just another example of a judge not doing their job and doing their due diligence and fact checking.

[–]AppropriateTouching -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

One example of the systems failure when it has worked countless other times doesn't prove the system as a whole is broken, just that there are some areas where it could be improved.

[–]Joe_Sith 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Fuck that, the judge who denied the father custody needs to spend some time behind bars.

[–]Ted8367 39 points40 points41 points 11 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

A judge disagreed.

And the judge had the main power. Therefore, the judge had the main responsibility. The judge should be charged with manslaughter.

It will never end until the people who actually cause things to happen are the same ones held to account for the consequences coming from their actions.

[–]almostchristian 11 points12 points13 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

At the very least, the judge should be named

[–][deleted] 24 points25 points26 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

D.C. Superior Court Judge Peter A. Krauthamer

[–]Bluebird_North 11 points12 points13 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not good history on this guy

http://www.macombdaily.com/opinion/20150603/before-boys-death-a-case-of-dad-discrimination

[+][deleted] 11 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]feeboo 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

couldn't care less.

[+]rolexpreneur -17 points-16 points-15 points 11 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

The judge should be charged with manslaughter.

That is one of he stupidest things I've seen this week, and is exactly the type of comment that makes people look at this sub as a sad joke.

[–]Ted8367 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That is one of he stupidest things I've seen this week

Oh, OK. On sober reflection, I think he should be charged with criminal negligence, rather than manslaughter.

[–]AppropriateTouching -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Pretty much. That makes them make even worse decisions then they already might.

[–]Ted8367 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

So, lets see, we can have it bad or we can have it worse, right?

[–]AppropriateTouching -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

No, we can have them occasionally bad, or always bad. Do some research and use some logic before being emotionally triggered.

[–]Ted8367 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

And the possibility of having it better? Not even broached.

That, and the many repetitions of that over the years, is how we have arrived here.

[–]AppropriateTouching -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Judges being open to litigation doesn't just effect this very small part of judgements. It's not perfect I agree but could be much worse.

[–]Ted8367 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The system as a whole has acted to bring this situation about, and you could say that the system as a whole bears the responsibility for it. The problem with fixing the system by allocating responsibility is that it's made up of many individuals, so individual responsibility is diluted so much that, in effect, no-one is responsible. Thus we do nothing except make excuses.

The judge is just a small part of the system, but in this case he occupied the pivot position. At the point where he made his decision, the force of the whole system - fundamentally lethal force, remember - was applied, and subsequent events proceeded from here onward. Therefore this is the place where corrective feedback could have an effect; that is, with the judge.

[–]AppropriateTouching 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't disagree with the point you just made and I think constant feed back and reform is important but I do disagree with judges being open to litigation for their judgements, that just leads to no good. Them being open to appeal and even termination from their position in extreme situations I agree with but being open to law suits or jail time (unless extreme misconduct and obvious intent is proven) is not a good idea.

[–]Ted8367 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

that just leads to no good.

This is a good point. But we have to start somewhere.

[+][deleted] 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]SmiteThe 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'll just leave this here... http://imgur.com/C66lkZe (sorry for potato phone)

[–]laxdstorn 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think the judge should be held partially liable for it. If he knowingly put a child in the custody of a mentally ill woman, in my opinion, there should be some ramifications for him!

[–]Fez4chins 10 points11 points12 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is just sad. This is heart breaking. What's happening to judicial system? Where's the rigorous efforts to maintain truth and justice prevails. Why is it all becoming so gynocentric? Are women really this privileged? That even with mental illness people trust them more with kids. We need to change the social perception of women as some sort of automatically great parents and mothers. There's an increasing tendency of deadbeat moms more than deadbeat dads.

[–]lolyer1 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is so true and i whole heartily agree. Judges that blindly rule and issue orders under the guise of what's best for the children, will hopefuly retire and stay away from once was a prestigious position.

The only way this damsel in distress team mon shit is gonna end is when we cycle through two more generations of judges and get more diverse life skills sitting in.

[–]ElMorono 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

This article was fairly brief, but other articles have explained that the judge was unaware of the mother's mental illness, and that the ex-husband did not bring it up in court. Not that I'm defending anybody here, but if the judge is unaware of the mother's problems, then an impartial verdict will not be reached.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/is-the-3-year-old-found-dead-on-a-park-swing-a-case-of-dad-discrimination/2015/06/01/b33e9396-0890-11e5-9e39-0db921c47b93_story.html

[–]crackinthewall 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Just the fact that the mother is unemployed should have helped swing the verdict in the father's favor. Think about it, where would she get the money to sustain herself let alone her child? The father?

It also doesn't help that the judge has decided a similar yet a lot more tragic case.

[–]Zephs 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

The judge asked if both parents agreed to joint custody. The judge asked if the father agreed that the mother should have primary custody. Both parents agreed, with no argument. The judge even asked if either parent thought the other parent was unfit. The father said "No.".

Honestly, this isn't the judge's fault. It's the father's fault. He knew she had a mental illness, and didn't say anything. Judges don't have time to investigate every single case when everyone agrees. The judge had no way of knowing there was more to this case, and the father decided not to inform the judge of the issues.

This isn't like Dear Zachary, where all the cards were on the table and the judge and everyone with authority ignored them. The mother's situation of being jobless and such doesn't matter all that much if both parents agree to joint custody.

[–]crackinthewall 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Legally maybe but that should not be the case when the parents are separated. Did the judge not know that the mother was unemployed? The mother can't exactly take care of their child if she herself cannot take care of herself. If they agreed to a joint custody, why should the judge, by default, ask if they agree that the mother should have primary custody. You'd think that the judge would have been a lot more careful given that he defended Banita Jacks, a woman who ended up killing her own family.

I'm not saying he should be sanctioned, just that the process itself of awarding custody should be questioned and hopefully changed. Sure they got joint custody but should the primary caregiver be someone who can't get her own life in order?

[–]Zephs 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

why should the judge, by default, ask if they agree that the mother should have primary custody

Because that's how most cases usually go anyway, and it's easier to phrase it as a "yes" or "no" question. Judges shouldn't give preferential treatment to mothers, but let's not be ignorant here. Mothers are usually the primary caregivers because both the father and mother agree to that. I don't see a problem with a judge asking if they're like an "average" family. The father could have just said no, although seeing as it was joint custody, I don't think it would have mattered who was the "primary" caregiver in this case, anyway.

Did the judge not know that the mother was unemployed? The mother can't exactly take care of their child if she herself cannot take care of herself.

If the father agrees that she is a fit parent, then it falls on him to provide child support to help support the child. The mother can also go on welfare while she looks for a job to help supplement her income. There's a ton of support out there for single mothers out of work. If a father were between jobs, I doubt anyone on this sub would say that they should have their child entirely taken away from them even if the mother agrees to joint custody. And that's the catch. He agreed. He could have said no and that she was unfit, but he did not. So the judge made a ruling based on both parents agreeing to the condition.

He didn't "award" custody to the mother because he made a judgement based on an argument presented before him. The parents went up, both said they agreed to something, and he signed the paperwork.

Do you really want to live in a world where parents agree to joint custody and the judges decide to ignore them and choose whoever they "feel" would make a better parent? Because I feel pretty safe in saying that it would work against men.

[–]ElMorono 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thanks friend, I missed the sentence where it said she was unemployed.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When will it end?

When they attempt to impose Australian model gun laws.

The result will be brief, noisy, and decisive.

[–]eloquentnemesis 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You get what you incentivize.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It will end when we start making people accountable for their decisions.

Judge decides to send the kid off with a reportedly mentally ill person without an evaluation and the kid is murdered by that person. He/she loses their job and possibly goes to jail for negligent homicide.

Same scenario and the judge orders a psychologist to evaluate the mother...psych says she is fine to be custodial parent...kid is murdered anyway....psychologist loses his/her career and goes to jail for negligent homicide.

In most people's jobs you make a mistake and someone dies as a direct result....you are probably going to be fired, and possibly charged with something...why can't we hold these positions responsible in the same manner?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Psychology is largely a "soft science". There are few actual objective tests so they rely on subjective factors to make assessments. As such, two different people can come to two different conclusions with the same data.

[–]bsutansalt 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

With great power comes great responsibility. As the judge had the power to make this right, but failed to do so, then he's ultimately responsible for putting these kids in the hands of killers.

As another poster stated, at a minimum the judge should be charged with manslaughter in cases such as this where no steps were taken to ensure the child's safety. It will never end until the people who actually cause things to happen are the same ones held to account for the consequences coming from their actions.

[–]chafedinksmut 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It will end when men stop providing the resources and violent action on behalf of the State to enslave other men. So, no time soon.

[–]lethalweapon100 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Can you sue a judge? Now is the time for that.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Alas, you cannot

[–]1bdkty 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The father may have brought up his concerns once, but when given the opportunity to reinerate them or push for custody he did not. I dont think you can (100%) say this is a court bias

According to a transcript of the hearing, Lee did not reiterate his fears about his son’s safety. The judge asked, “So is there a reason why you two shouldn’t share this child? Is someone unfit here?” Lee responded, “There’s no one unfit.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/sheriffs-office-death-of-boy-found-on-park-swing-was-a-homicide/2015/06/30/782b7c92-1f5b-11e5-84d5-eb37ee8eaa61_story.html

[–]Electroverted 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If judges would start being held accountable in custody cases that lead to violence, the same way bartenders are accountable for tragic DUIs

I would be so happy.

[+]tiqr -8 points-7 points-6 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

This is a sensational story, but we have way too little information to jump to any conclusions.

Was this woman an unfit parent? In retrospect, absolutely. But we know nothing about the father, and nothing about how the mother had behaved prior to this incident. For all we know the mother was chair of the local PTA and the father had been recently released from prison.

It's easy to criticize the courts for 'bias' or 'getting it wrong' when we have no idea whatsoever about what happened in court. This is an awful outcome, and clearly the court should have reached a different decision. But that's only with the benefit of hindsight - something courts never have.

[–]citywok44451 25 points26 points27 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

This happened less than 5 miles from my house.I drive past Wills Park nearly every day Sorry but in my mind we have PLENTY of information to come to a conclusion. She was homeless, unemployed, had a problem with synthetic drugs, tried to shoot her husband while hallucinating (but the gun jammed), jumped out of a moving cab with her son, was mentally ill and had breakdowns. The judge ignored his concerns and insisted on them "coparenting" with her having physical custody. This is a result of systemic bias against fathers in family court. The judge should be ashamed and we need to stop making excuses.

[+]rolexpreneur -14 points-13 points-12 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Actually no, the judge had no idea about her mental issues because the father never brought it up in court. I can actually provide a source for this, unlike your claims which seem completely made up.

[–]ARedthorn 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

This is true.

That said, I'd love to write the judge a letter asking if he was still convinced she was the better parent, or if he'd consider a retrial.

Hindsight is 20/20, and maybe he made the best decision he could at the moment.

But then again, maybe he was biased, and will only realize on self-reflection.

Either way, it's a learning experience he needs to face. I only hope he does.

Edit: lest anyone think I'm being too hard on the judge- days after he deemed her the more fit parent, she put the kid in a swing for 2 days straight, and was still pushing the kid when they were discovered.

Meaning, in that judge's professional opinion, she went from "legally of sound mind and body" to "playing paddy-cake with your baby's 2-day-old-corpse crazy" in under a week.

Psychotic breaks are a thing, but the father saw this coming, so there absolutely were signs that the judge missed or overlooked.

And he is a judge in family law. Figuring this shit out is precisely his job, that he's spent decades training for.

Either he's inept, or biased all to hell.

[–]AppropriateTouching -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

How dare you present a reasonable argument that isn't purely emotionally based. /s But seriously, these are questions that should always be asked before jumping to conclusions.

[–]tiqr -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

MRAs are just SJWs with a different ideology. Contrary opinions are by definition "illogical" or "ignorant".

[–]AppropriateTouching 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Seems like there is s lot of that around here. It's no better. A big part of why Im unsubbing.

[–]chavelah -4 points-3 points-2 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Two things:

  1. An aggressive guardian ad litem (or court-appointed advocate, or whatever they call it in your state) could have altered the course of this case. All American citizens over age 18 with clean criminal records are eligible to volunteer for this vital role. Go sign the fuck up and help at-risk children in your community.

  2. When a mentally ill person is caring for a child or other helpless person, and they call you and tell you to come pick them up, GO. By the time they are calling their perceived adversaries and asking them to intervene, they are teetering on the edge of something awful.

[–]RedditorJemi 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, as long as his employer isn't going to fire him for taking off work early, which is always possible, and for black employees, I'd say it's downright likely. If a black guy has to take off work every time his [ex] wife/girlfriend/whatever calls and says she and the kid needs to be picked up, a lot more black people will be chronically unemployed. And being a 'perceived adversary' is far from unique in relationships - even before they end.

[–]AppropriateTouching 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This doesn't need to be a race issue, this works for any lower class (easily replaceable) man.

[–]RedditorJemi 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, it's more class than race for sure. The article just didn't explicitly mention anything about social class, so I would have been making more of a leap (It also didn't specifically say the father was black).

[–]chavelah -4 points-3 points-2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If he went over after he got off shift, the child would still be alive.

I'm not blaming the father, AT ALL. I just hope that a similar tragedy can be averted in future because somebody read my words and decided to heed them.

[+]chavelah -6 points-5 points-4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If he went over after he got off shift, the child would still be alive.

I'm not blaming the father, AT ALL. I just hope that a similar tragedy can be averted in future because somebody read my words and decided to heed them.

[–]RedditorJemi 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ah, that's likely. I hadn't been thinking about that. Although we haven't seen the coroner's report yet. He could easily have ingested the poison about the time she called him. He should certainly have gone over there after his shift ended at least. The ultimate responsibility must pass to the judge, who should easily be able to predict that something bad would result from giving custody to an insane woman.

[–]flip69 -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Don't stick your dick in crazy... and this is actually a darwin situation. The parent was not successfully reproductive.

[–]Idontlikekarmawhores -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When we as a men take a stand, when we teach our kids to be man, and when we destroy betas.

[–]MadTrini -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Anybody post this on TwoX?

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter