Update: The replies from the moderators appear to indicate they accept absolutely no responsibility for their personal attacks and marginalization of men's rights advocates. My suggestion, therefore, is that any time ignatiusloyola resorts to a personal attack or emotional appeal rather than a rational argument, you simply call him on it, tell him you will not tolerate harassment in a rational discussion, and link to this post to demonstrate this pattern.

I have a copy of this post at the following link. Feel free to report any further abuses by ignatiusloyola in the comments section. http://www.reddit.com/r/AboutMensRights/comments/n4lg8/rmensrights_moderator_ignatiusloyolas_habit_of/

I will also be working on a short compilation of AnnArchist's puerile attacks to link to in the event that he continues to harass men's rights advocates with such behavior.

SRS came into this thread recently and up-voted comments from supporters of ignatiusloyola while down-voting comments from MRAs who aren't far-leftists like ignatius. This isn't surprising since ignatiusloyola and SRS share an ideology: extreme leftism.

Skeptical of the recent bannings, I took the the time to review the posting histories of ignatiusloyola, thingsarebad, and MrStinkybutt. What I found was a pattern of harassment by ignatiusloyola against men's rights advocates that we should find entirely unacceptable. This is important, people. A moderator should not marginalize men's rights advocates who hold political views that differ from his own. We need all the MRAs we can get. But I leave you to be the judge.

All of the examples below are quotations from ignatiusloyola taken directly from comments at r/MensRights.

Let's start with a few examples from a month ago:

Personal attack against Demonspawn: Those are completely unfounded accusations, but I wouldn't expect much better from the likes of you. Really, it is you and your ilk that are ruining society. You racist, sexist, bigoted fuck-up of a human being.

Personal attack against LWRellim: Are you serious or just a douche?

Personal attack against WhiteDragonTiger:

You are trying to use emotion, dude. You are trying to goad me into making points. So here is a point for you...

I am telling you that I simply don't care enough about you to spend my time writing out statements about my economic and political beliefs that you likely won't read enough except to exercise your repertoire of pre-formatted responses. You won't consider anything I say except as a challenge to overcome. You aren't entering the discussion with intent to learn, you are entering the discussion as a challenge.

And here we are - you are wasting your time trying to start a debate with me and I am getting exactly what I want: a discussion about discussion!

Is it too much for me? Or do I simply not care about anything you have to say beyond how much I can get you to write?

Personal attack against thingsarebad: If anything, I pity you. Otherwise, you are good for a laugh now and then. Like this comment, for instance. It is so delusional, it is tough to take it as anything other than funny.

Personal attacks against MrStinkybutt:

1: If you can't understand that, then you are either thicker than I give you credit for or else more manipulative than everyone realizes.

2: Looks like it is that whole "thick" thing I was referring to...

The rest of these are just from the last 5 days.

Personal attack: Either you lack genuineness and honesty in your arguments, or else you are struggling with basics of logic and reason.

Personal attack: I have told you before that correlation is not causation, and you just make yourself look ignorant every time you try to use the same tired rhetoric.

Personal attack: This is what stands for an argument? Alright, I will concede that this is likely the best that you can do.

Personal attack: Holy shit you are dense here... That is amazing. This is the most hypocritical pile of response I think I have ever read. And if you can't grasp that, then I think I hear elementary school science calling for you.

Personal attack: That doesn't even make sense. Do you read or just make up the shit that you are responding to?

Personal attack, projection: Just because you lack the reading comprehension to understand the mod policy, doesn't mean that we should actually do whatever it is you say.

Personal attack, appeal to emotion: Wow, your glaring lack of understanding statistics, lack of reason and logic, and lack of ethics astounds me.

Personal attack, appeal to emotion: So go ahead - keep making your claims, and keep challenging us "leftist MRAs", because you merely out yourself as amoral, and unethical.

Personal attack: Again - work on that reading comprehension.

Personal attack: For christ sake, a child could understand that. Why are you having troubles with it?

I encourage everyone to read the links in detail, and you will see the pattern is clear.