A lot of people don't identify with TRP and also claim that they are not BP. Also, on PPD there are people who identify as PP. This type of thinking often leaves the interpretation open about what it means.

There are two main ways to identify as BP as I see it, the weak case being the ignorant to the gender wars, and strong case being SJW. I feel that this sums up most non-RPers (and PPers), however some still resent getting the label claiming that there are other options. I have not yet seen a reason for this, although I am open to the possibility. Every non-RPer I've encountered on here has been on the RP/BP spectrum, using BP as either the strong or the weak case.

On the strong case, you have feminists running counter to TRP. In that this is the complete opposite ideology with theories and agendas of it's own about how things should be done. On the weak case, you have BPers giving useless platitudes, or lacking understanding. Some people are moderate and believe some of both, or accept some principles.

So how is it possible to exist outside of this spectrum in either case? Most things are not esoteric. Are you just mad cause you got labeled and you like to defy labels? Is it actually a graph 2D, much like the political spectrum graph represents a false dichotomy between the left and the right, where there is also statism and libertarianism? If this is the case, what is the other axis and what do those ends represent? Actions vs. Beliefs seems like it could be plausible but I don't know. If you are "not a pill" or non-RP yet also not PP or BP, what are your beliefs (or actions) that are neither RP (or PP), or either case of BP?

Note: This is not about TBP or TRP, it's about the concepts, not the people.

Edit: typos

Edit 2: Just to clarify, for something to be not a pill, the views would have to be orthogonal to the RP/BP spectrum, of which PP is included (as a moderate). If your views are not actually outside that, you are still falling on the spectrum, and you still have a pill (i.e. RP, BP, or PP).