Jordan P. explains why you shouldn't blindly believe women. Being weaker than men, gossip, innuendo and reputation destruction is their only recourse & agression outlet.

Meyright · 2018-05-27T12:52:29+00:00

His frustration with her is obvious. She was making a very clear attempt to parry and deflect everything he said with irrelevant statements and attempts to get him to state something the MSM can take out of context for another hitjob. He gets this treatment all the time; he'll, being a clinical psychologist, refer to something well established and well known in the literature, and the clueless person interviewing him will begin to dispute it. He'll point back at the literature, and then they'll try to sideswipe his credibility or argument by deflecting in another way.

xNOM · 2018-05-27T13:29:03+00:00

You can literally see her stiffen up the moment he says one of the functions of society is to set the expectations by which people regulate their behavior, whether they’re men or women (right around 1:30).

Self-control is a patriarchal concept, apparently — or at least it’s only an issue for men.

Edit: later on she says, “I don’t care what the research says, I want to know what you think.”

She is trying to get him to give a personal opinion so she can attack him personally, and he knows it. He doesn’t take the bait. He knows she’s trying to portray him as an ideologue. That’s why, at the end, he says, “I’m not an ideologue.”

xNOM · 2018-05-27T17:09:58+00:00

I watched this whole interview. The best part really is that a few minutes in he starts drawing a doodle. He continues this through the whole interview. Near the end where she starts going off the rails, I think she's visibly disturbed by the ease with which he cuts through her nonsense while only paying half-attention and doodling.

So boss, LOL.

Odysseus_is_Ulysses · 2018-05-27T13:50:18+00:00

This woman seems like she just wanted any reason to disagree with this guy. He makes constant good and balanced points that seem very unbiased. Yet she tries to twist his words at every turn.

todoke · 2018-05-27T09:54:10+00:00

I have never seen it that way but it makes perfect sense. Being weaker than men, their only option for revenge and aggression outlet is verbally. That's the only way they can hurt you. It also explains why feminists and SJW go so much over board and into exremes. They only have words as weapons, so that's what they do. They try to beat their opponent up with alligations, character assassination and gossip.

Kuato2012 · 2018-05-27T18:39:14+00:00

"I think a liberal doesn't think that a society controls women or men." - The interviewer

What a bizarre statement. One of society's primary functions is to regulate the behavior of its people, whether by rule of law or enforcing social norms or whatever. The whole reason you or I don't get to run around stealing stuff is because our society collectively decided to restrict that behavior in its people, for the good of us all.

She's fishing for a gotcha moment. Not only is JP not taking the bait, but she's looking a bit silly in the process.

Lethn · 2018-05-27T10:32:01+00:00

Happy Unintentional Irony Day!

doubtvilified · 2018-05-27T14:51:22+00:00

Thanks for this video. I watched the clip then found the full interview on youtube, i had never heard of him.

He speaks well and has thought out responses to questions.

I'll be looking at more of his content.

RobDog101 · 2018-05-27T22:30:57+00:00

Female supremacists can't stand when someone says anything remotely unflattering about femininity.

EDIT: Had a brain fart. Female *supremacists, not misogynists lol

BetterOut · 2018-05-27T23:38:28+00:00

A very testy interview. The interviewer is clearly trying to twist everything he says to support her decision to view him as anti women. Nowhere did I hear Jordan link out of control women's behaviour to the fact they are weaker than men. I get the feeling OP just came to that conclusion himself. So out of control men are more likely to be physical and out of control women are more likely to use gossip, innuendo and reputation destruction.
The rest of us (who are in control), might actually be decent people who can get along. :)

guyau · 2018-05-27T16:10:49+00:00

Jesus Christ he doesn't explain 'why you shouldn't believe women' at all. If you want mrm to have a reputation for misogyny, it's through inflammatory titles like that. Mrm is going to be destroyed by all these weak, self hating men with a personal ax to grind against 'women'.

2018-05-28T09:33:55+00:00

Its funny how she kept trying to trap him into saying something super sexist. She didn't want to engage with him. She tried really hard to maneuver him into saying something shitty so she can destroy his reputation instead of combating his arguments. Lol.

Rather than listening to what he's saying, she's engaging in exactly the bullying methods he's describing women engaging in. Really fucking funny.

WillMeatLover · 2018-05-29T10:07:34+00:00

The interviewer is such an unbelievably annoying bitch. Can she let him answer a question for more than 5 seconds without interrupting to say something else stupid?

Dasdasdasdas8 · 2018-07-08T18:23:46+00:00

Link is down. Does anyone have the link to the whole interview?

Valencia_Mariana · 2018-05-27T22:00:12+00:00

Can we not put words into his mouth? The title of this thread is bollocks, can a mode not rename it?

OminousCactus · 2018-05-27T21:31:38+00:00

Lol he sounds actually retarded trying to argue the psychology of half the planet based on.... what? His own poor choices in women? What a beta fag

Comments