/r/TheBluePill is often criticized for cherry-picking the worst TRP comments to prove their points, comments from angry-phase newbies that are not (and cannot be seen as) indicative of TRP as a whole. I have no issues admitting that the argument there is a very solid argument. That being said, I believe that comments and posts originating from /r/TRP's moderators, Endorsed Contributors, and Vanguards are (and can be seen as) indicative of TRP as a whole.

The red pill is bitter and difficult to swallow, and it's not going to happen over night. Listen to the endorsed contributors, they know what they're talking about.

is intended to let newer users know that this user is a good source of information, and not some other new user whose advice might not necessarily be good.

  • In the same post, he want us to "understand that TheRedPill is not a democracy. The veterans there have a pretty good idea what the difference is, and the Endorsed Contributors have an established history of providing good content."

  • In his post [Mod] Announcement: Endorsed Contributors, moderator /u/redpillschool let's us know that users rewarded with the EC title are especially unplugged insightful contributors that show repeated dedication and a high-working knowledge of red pill theory.

  • In his post [MOD] You used to get two chances to fuck up. Now you only get one., moderator /u/MachiavellianRed warns us that "if you break one rule once -he will ban you."

You get the point. I believe it's disingenuous for people here to say any comments or posts are "cherry-picking" when said comments or posts come from /r/TheRedPill moderators, Endorsed Contributors, and Vanguards.