Q4women: would rather have children with a slightly below average husband or with a high quality sperm donor?

[deleted] · 2016-02-15T14:29:58+00:00

[permanently deleted]

OfSpock · 2016-02-15T04:39:29+00:00

Scandinavian hunk, but, like most situations posed by red pill, there is a better third option. Like most women I went out and found someone on my level who I was very attracted to and married him and would prefer to have his children rather than the sperm donors.

ianturpiesmoustache · 2016-02-15T03:59:45+00:00

If I married him, I wouldn't think him below average, so with my husband. I prefer scrawny, anyway.

wuboo · 2016-02-15T03:07:59+00:00

I think I'll just adopt.

IVIaskerade · 2016-02-15T05:20:21+00:00

Why are these the only two options??

wuboo · 2016-02-15T03:06:55+00:00

what is this question meant to prove or determine? it doesn't seem to have much of a point.

CuddleLumpkin · 2016-02-15T06:04:00+00:00

Why can't I marry the Scandinavian hunk?

LaDuquesaDeAfrica · 2016-02-15T08:25:34+00:00

Does the husband make me laugh? Is he smart? Am I attracted to him? All of these questions are irrelevant of course because if he's my husband that means I'm already in love with him. I'd prefer to have kids with my husband. I'd actually never go to a sperm donor.

artichokess · 2016-02-15T10:57:10+00:00

i don't understand this question. if i'm in love with someone enough to marry him, i would also probably want to start a family with him.

edit: are you asking would we rather settle for someone we aren't attracted to just to have a marriage and a father for the kids, or raise a kid on our own that comes from someone with qualities we like better? if that's your question, then i wouldn't marry anyone i wasn't attracted to in the first place.

belletaco · 2016-02-15T15:24:22+00:00

Marry a below average man, all day. Stability is great.

yasee · 2016-02-15T16:51:06+00:00

I hack the sperm bank database, track down the scandinavian hunk and seduce him.

Then I jack his sperm, empty his bank accounts and abscond with my brilliant geneticist lover, Felipe. We use the ill-gotten sperm and wealth to fund research into obedient super-humans; we breed an army and years later they take over the world at our behest

Bluer_than_Red · 2016-02-15T08:36:18+00:00

Top quality donor obviously.

AprilMaria · 2016-02-15T13:52:23+00:00

Well on the one hand hes a sperm donor and if hes a cunt its not like im going to have to put up with his personality, so if i never married, yes, because i would still want children and then we are basically hitting into genetics and artificial insemination like when you have cattle or horses and select a prime stallion or bull for your cow or mare based only on genetics and proof of progeny.

If i fell in love with a man who was bellow average then no. If you raise a family with some one you do it together from start to finish, sperm donation is a fail safe which i dont need to avail of because i have a man. Plain blank average but i still love him.

scallopkid · 2016-02-15T14:31:36+00:00

Children need fathers, so if I had to pick between the two options I'd go with the below average guy, but IRL if these were my options I'd use my money to buy a really fancy cat.

GridReXX · 2016-02-15T15:14:40+00:00

I guess it depends what I value more. Supreme attraction to my mate or a quality male role model for my kids.

I think history has shown that women choose the stable family life over "sparks."

SpaceWhiskey · 2016-02-15T19:20:40+00:00

There's no guarantee that having a child with a "high quality" sperm donor will produce high quality offspring (which is also not a concern of mine and I think people who believe in that stuff are ridiculous), so I'd rather have kids with someone I actually care about who plans to stick around and be a father.

If I wanted kids at all. Which I don't.

downunderit · 2016-02-15T03:35:02+00:00

I don't want children so neither? I mean if I was super rich I would probably adopt some third world child.

speltspelt · 2016-02-15T07:58:37+00:00

My relationship screening is psychological so anyone who passed that (even if scrawny, plain etc.) would be preferable to a sperm donor, since they don't quite screen donors on the axis I'm looking for.

[deleted] · 2016-02-16T02:42:46+00:00

It's as if you think high quality women just want a baby put in them since that's all you, as a man, think women are for.

[deleted] · 2016-02-15T03:59:37+00:00

Scandinavian hunk of course.

AutoModerator · 2016-02-15T02:47:35+00:00

Attention!

You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.
For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.
If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging his view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[deleted] · 2016-02-15T19:52:24+00:00

Neither. Kids are a pain in the ass and a money drain. I don't care about passing on my genes in the least.

snbdmliss · 2016-02-15T22:28:00+00:00

My preference is husband, yes much is genetic, but much is nurture too, and having a husband and family with a good man is my definite preference. Most men that fall into the other category have major issues of one kind or another. I want stability and lifelong happiness with a family and relationship willing to be great to each other and build together instead of independently. Humans work best in teams, not solo.

FatMan8Pack · 2016-02-17T17:17:10+00:00

If I was a women I would go for the sperm doner. No reason to waste money, time, and effort on a man when he's relatively useless and below average.

DivinePrince2 · 2016-02-18T01:01:06+00:00

I would rather kill and eat a child. Juicy flesh. Not pretty to look at, but delicious to taste.

ifelsedowhile · 2016-02-15T18:13:26+00:00

this thread doesn't have many answers. that's because women are ashamed of admitting the truth: they mostly need men as providers, not because of real attraction to them. I definitely struck a nerve.

Title	Q4women: would rather have children with a slightly below average husband or with a high quality sperm donor?
Author	ifelsedowhile
Upvotes	6
Comments	83
Date	February 15, 2016 2:47 AM UTC (10 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/PurplePillDebate
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/45ueyy/q4women_would_rather_have_children_with_a/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/PurplePillDebate/q4women-would-rather-have-children-with-a-slightly.276233 https://theredarchive.com/post/276233

Comments