The Red Pill presents a lot of studies and scientific data used to prove their talking points, and much of their proof regards what women and men want in a partner. Relationships aren't the main focus of the Red Pill, but the topic is a key component of it.

One thing that people like Andrew Tate, Fresh and Fit, JustPearlyThings, RealFemSapien, and other Red Pillers online bring up is the importance of traditional gender roles. Now, I'm no dummy. There's a reason why Fifty Shades of Grey was so popular with women. Many women want to submit to a strong, masculine man. And many men want to be a protector and for their woman to follow his lead.

But for me, a huge problem is that the Red Pill holds this to be an absolute truth. Many in this community say that deep down, all people want a traditional relationship. While they don't disprove the rule, there are exceptions. Some men naturally want to submit and take the feminine role, and some women are naturally dominant and want to take the masculine role. Yes, people like this are rare, but they do exist. The Red Pill community does not seem to take them into account.

And just like how some feminists like to say it's "The patriarchy's" fault women want to be housewives or submit to their man, some Red Pillers like to blame feminism or society itself for outliers. Apparently, if a man is submissive or feminine, it MUST be because of feminism or because he was raised by a single mother. If a woman genuinely wants to lead the relationship, it MUST be because of feminism or because she hasn't found a man who can out-alpha her, or because she had trauma or a weak father.

So I wanna ask the Red Pill community, what are some flaws or critiques you have of the Red Pill?