TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

Professors fear engineering exam may be ‘biased’ against women

Heavy_Grand2526

December 30, 2022
170 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://www.campusreform.org/article?id=11220
Archived from /r/MensRights

r/MensRights is a community advocating for the social and legal equality of men and boys since 2008.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/MensRights archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Professors fear engineering exam may be ‘biased’ against women
Author

Heavy_Grand2526

Upvotes 170
Comments 104
Date December 30, 2022 4:54 AM UTC
(3 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/zyrey9/professors_fear_engineering_exam_may_be_biased/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/professors-fear-engineering-exam-may-be-biased.1213283
https://theredarchive.com/post/1213283
Top posts by Heavy_Grand2526

"#MeToo is over if we don’t listen to ‘imperfect victims’ like Amber Heard"; Gross article denies Men can be victims of abuse & encourages people to never believe Men. Individuals such as this are why so many Men feel uncomfortable about opening up or seeking support.

2289 upvotes
May 23, 2022
/r/MensRights

"I'm a mom who flies in business class while my family stays in economy. We see it as a lesson on feminism."

1500 upvotes
June 11, 2023
/r/MensRights

Miami OnlyFans model captured on video beating boyfriend she later killed

1444 upvotes
August 11, 2022
/r/MensRights

"A man whose partner used a broken dinner plate to kill him had "stayed silent" about the abuse he faced, according to his friends. The friends set up the Paul Lavelle Foundation, encouraging more men to speak out about their experiences of domestic abuse."

1388 upvotes
May 20, 2022
/r/MensRights

Johnny Depp lands first major role after being 'cancelled': Embattled actor to play King Louis XV

1388 upvotes
January 26, 2022
/r/MensRights

Young men today feel they must be six feet tall, make six figures, and have six inches downstairs to get a girlfriend—so many have given up trying

1284 upvotes
September 15, 2023
/r/MensRights

Mindy Kaling admitted to non-consensually kissing a co-star on her show, threatening the producers of firing them if they told anyone

1269 upvotes
January 20, 2023
/r/MensRights

If it takes this much pain & suffering for someone as wealthy/famous as Johnny Depp to get justice, imagine the amount of struggling the average man goes through in a False Accusation

1163 upvotes
April 25, 2022
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]Anih1list 102 points103 points104 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

“she conceded that there is no way of knowing for sure whether gender bias is to blame until more research is done.”

Not only is the headline of the article misleading, it’s almost a pointless article.

[–]denyjunctionfunction 34 points35 points36 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Gotta secure the “research” grants somehow. Make vague arguments, publish, rinse, and repeat until you retire.

[–]Anih1list 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, I’m okay with research happening, what I’m not okay with is the research hypothesis being presented as the whole story

[–]Dr-Death-Angel 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Almost? It’s utterly pointless.

Women can be just as smart as men. I don’t see the issue, unless she’s trying to imply otherwise.

[–]Stopyourshenanigans 68 points69 points70 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

But in fields where the engineering design cannot be tested prior to use, such as roads, bridges, and buildings, the PE exam is typically required (...)

Right, so it's important for the safety of everyone that uses these roads/bridges/buildings, that the engineers are actually able to pass the exam.

Keen suggested that the timing of the exam may pose a problem for women, as they may have less time to study due to family obligations.

So in other words, the exam ISN'T biased against women, they just lack the knowledge because they "don't have time to study"?

[–]rlyfunny 16 points17 points18 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s rather funny to me that a hint for a small hinderance gets an article, meanwhile boys/men fall behind in education further and further

[–]Stunna4Yerks 36 points37 points38 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

pretty much, the world is going crazy if they want to let women get access to critical positions in society with less training which could result in harm to members of society later down the line.

[–]Cocoa-nut-Cum 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In the long run, a policy like this would make women look bad by perpetuating stereotypes. These so called progressives are always shooting themselves in the foot.

[–]TraehNoil 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You wouldn’t have time to study either if you had 10 men DM’ing you every day offering to take you out.

[–]WowwOkk__ 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's so insulting to women jfc. As though men don't have other obligations also. How dumb.

[–]equalRights111 77 points78 points79 points 3 years ago (45 children) | Copy Link

Of course, because not being able to pass the exam must mean some sort of bias against women. Interestingly, I raised a similar concern with feminists before, about the fact that boys do worse in school and so the education system is biased against boys. The response was that maybe girls are smarter than boys… Yet here, they immediately jump to ‘bias against women’.

Looking at the details of the exam itself, it does seem rather excessive, it is 8 hours apparently!

[–]NameIs-Already-Taken 37 points38 points39 points 3 years ago (37 children) | Copy Link

Engineering is hard. Mistakes can kill people. Thorough exams make sense. Source: Engineering graduate.

[–]Stunna4Yerks 11 points12 points13 points 3 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link

As an engineering graduate who knows the dangers of your profession, and worked hard to graduate I know this must be infuriating to you.

[–]NameIs-Already-Taken 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

They will re-evaluate after some innocent people have died. There's nothing else we can really do.

[–]TracyMorganFreeman 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Remember the bridge that collapsed that was designed by an all female staff of engineers? They didn't reevaluate shit.

[–]Misunderstood_bafoon 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Let me guess , even when women fail it’s men’s fault. We probably set them up to failure, maybe men kept some knowledge from them, maybe men’s indifference towards them made them less confident about their abilities, blablabla hahahaha

[+]NameIs-Already-Taken -6 points-5 points-4 points 3 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

This one? https://www.factcheck.org/2018/03/female-led-company-didnt-build-collapsed-bridge/

[–]TracyMorganFreeman 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It was an all female design team.

The bridge was literally celebrated on International Women's Day as such.

The "fact checks" are regarding an entire different claim that the entire company was female.

[–]BPTforever 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I wonder what they're going to answer to this.

[–]Kindly-Proposal14591 points 3 years ago [recovered] (9 children) | Copy Link

I love that facts are always downvoted here.

[–]Cookiedoughjunkie 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

read the damn article. The question was is the company female led. No.

The question should have been were the design engineers all female, which was yes. That's how fact checkers like snope lie to you a lot. They rewrite the question to a way they can answer it without giving the answer they don't like.

[–]Kindly-Proposal14591 points 3 years ago [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link

Give me an article saying that the failure of the bridge is due to their mistake.

[–]Cookiedoughjunkie 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/fiu-bridge-collapse-lessons-learnt-three-years-since-florida-tragedy-15-03-2021/

"A National Transportation Safety Board report into the collapse concluded that design calculation errors made by MCM’s consultant Figg Bridge Engineers were ultimately to blame."

[–]Kindly-Proposal1459-1 point 3 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

https://www.constructiondive.com/news/osha-places-blame-for-fiu-bridge-collapse-on-engineer-contractors/556798/

[–]Cookiedoughjunkie2 points 3 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

What do you think that says?

because it also agrees it's on the engineers.

[–]Kindly-Proposal14590 points 3 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Dude, did you read the article or just the headline?

[–]Cookiedoughjunkie1 point 3 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I could ask the same thing of you. You didn't read your source, you just posted it.

[–]NameIs-Already-Taken -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Do you have a source for that please?

[–]Cookiedoughjunkie 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/zyrey9/comment/j2brtlg/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web2x&context=3

[–]Stunna4Yerks 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I pray it doesn't get to the point where innocents have to loose they're lives. But what's even more scary is the way society is coddling women now is that even if we do reach that point they STILL might not re-evaluate things.

[–]NameIs-Already-Taken 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What will they do about Montana and men's pass rate being lower there? Oh yeah... absolutely nothing at all. But where women do less well? That requires action!

[–]Stunna4Yerks 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Reply

it's a damn shame is what it is, change is needed when women are involved. But like you said screw men and our passing rates.

[–]LearnDifferenceBot -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

loose they're lives

*their

Learn the difference here.


Greetings, I am a language corrector bot. To make me ignore further mistakes from you in the future, reply !optout to this comment.

[–]GeorgeOlduvai 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Bad bot. You didn't correct loose to lose.

[–]LearnDifferenceBot -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Bad human.

[–]equalRights111 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Infuriating to who? Me? What do you mean?

[–]NebulousASK 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This was a response to

Engineering is hard. Mistakes can kill people. Thorough exams make sense. Source: Engineering graduate.

So I believe the comment was meant as: "It must be infuriating to be an engineering graduate and see them dumbing down the test for political reasons."

[–]Stunna4Yerks 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thank you clearing up my above comment! That is what the comment was meant as

[–]Stunna4Yerks 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sorry if I wasn't clear, I don't want you to take what I said the wrong way! The person below you worded it in the exact way I intended the comment to come across.

NebulousASK
·
23h ago
This was a response to
Engineering is hard. Mistakes can kill people. Thorough exams make sense. Source: Engineering graduate.
So I believe the comment was meant as: "It must be infuriating to be an engineering graduate and see them dumbing down the test for political reasons."

[–]equalRights111 -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

True, but an 8 hour exam? Why? Why not hold it over two days or something?

[–]NameIs-Already-Taken 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Perhaps an extended test, under pressure, is what's needed as a way of checking someone fit for practising in the real world? Maybe the objective is to force the candidate to demonstrate to exercise many skills simultaneously, such as design, drawing, stress analysis, all in one go, because many engineering problems require solutions that satisfy conflicting requirements. For example, aircraft must be light, tough, safe, fuel-efficient and as cheap as possible. Doing any one of those is easy!

[–]equalRights111 -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Perhaps yes, but it seems that would better done on the job as training (under the supervision of someone more qualified). The exam is presumably to test knowledge and application of it, not to test how long you can endure pressure or whatever.

[–]NameIs-Already-Taken 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I am not in a place to add any further value.

[–]equalRights111 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Right… Whatever that means.

[–]NameIs-Already-Taken 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It means I am not in a place to comment further on whether this way of examining people is helpful or not, compared to the alternatives.

[–]equalRights111 -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sure.

[–]NebulousASK -3 points-2 points-1 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

But is a thorough exam the best way to filter for mistakes?

I'm an attorney, and I feel like the bar exam is a lot less important than good time as a junior associate or clerk. I would think apprenticeships or the like (time on the job under more experienced engineers) would be more important than a grueling exam to assure engineering quality.

[–]NameIs-Already-Taken 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Engineering apprenticeships are really important and produce valuable professionals who can make and build amazing products to high standards on dodgy equipment. Engineering degrees produce a different kind of engineer, one who can design what needs to be made. It needs both formal training (a Bachelors or Masters degree) and a period of supervision: No-one wants a fresh Civil Engineering graduate to design a bridge without input from more experienced engineers! Well, maybe except for litigation lawyers! ;-)

[–]MusicalMerlin1973 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Either you have a basic mastery of your profession or you don’t.

I’m an EE. by training, software programmer in real life. Having gone through the schooling but not taking the test (we don’t have one for software-like trying to hit a fast moving target) yeah if the person can’t pass the engineering exam they have no business fucking with chemicals, electricity or load bearing structures to the degree that a professional engineer does.

You want the extra money and responsibilities that come with being a professional, certified engineer? Take the exam.

[–]Snivelingincel 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I’m any area where men excel there must exist a bias against women. In any area where women excel it’s because women are just better at the task.

Apparently innate gender differences can only exist when they benefit women.

[–]equalRights111 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That’s exactly what the person I discussed it with suggested!

[–]Misunderstood_bafoon 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

“It’s biased against women when we do better but it’s not biased against men when they do better. “ Feminist logic 101

[–]equalRights111 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly, but this typically applies to all issues that men face. When you raise an issue affecting men, it doesn’t count, for some reason.

[–]Cookiedoughjunkie 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

yeah, except there's a proven bias against men that teachers will down a grade against boys or multiple reasons even for the same exam unless the answers are like multiple choice.

Then there's the whole funding issue and scholarships.

[–]equalRights111 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly, I agree. The point is that if it disadvantages men, then it doesn’t count (for whatever reason, patriarchy, misinformation, whatever). If it disadvantages women, then omg so sexist, we must do something about this.

[–]elebrin -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If the exam is that long, to help, my only real suggestion would be breaking it down into several 2 hour parts. Sitting for 8 hours without moving while pushing a pencil is intense. I've done it before and, given the choice, I won't do it again.

Of course, a lot of these women are moving out of engineering in two years anyways because it's a difficult field that has a challenging work life balance.

[–]theblackzombie92 33 points34 points35 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah they should just skip the exam and get a pass lol

[–]WeEatBabies 88 points89 points90 points 3 years ago (24 children) | Copy Link

I read all that and now I have a nose bleed, thanks OP!

FTFA : Women in engineering may also have spent less time developing technical skills, Keen said.

But the first step to fixing this, Keen writes, is addressing the “biases in the exam itself.”

These two lines are literally one after the other. Someone with a PHD wrote that, an editor green-lit it.

Woman, life on easy mode.

[–]JJhammertime1 points 3 years ago [recovered] (23 children) | Copy Link

If women are socialized through life to develop less technical skills, wouldn’t that be life on hard mode? If they’re literally not taught as much as men. Wouldn’t that make life harder?

[–]mikesteane 21 points22 points23 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Even if this were true, and it isn't, this would still not justify dropping the standards for one gender only. The only purpose of the exam is to assess competence.

[–]JJhammertime1 points 3 years ago [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link

If there was a test about child rearing to determine which parent should get custody, would men do as well as women? Or would typical societal roles mean women do better? Would it be a fair practice to just say whoever does better on the test gets he kid? Or would it make sense to give men some advantages as societal roles tend to mean mothers handle more of those things?

[–]Fix-Advanced 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Considering women abuse children at a higher rate than men. Yes there should be a test and men would do better.

[–]Mode1961 11 points12 points13 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Please get back to me when that starts happening. Again, you are comparing something already happening to something that will never happen.

[–]nokappa1 11 points12 points13 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Honestly I'd love to see something like that happen, if only for the sake of the kids.

Your entire paragraph details that child-rearing IS a learned skillset. And while women generally do these jobs, we cannot determine that they've done it "better" because there's no comparison available.

On that note, I believe there has been evidence that children from single father families do better than single mother families.

[–]Cookiedoughjunkie 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

as rare as the situation to compare, the facts do show the fewer single father lead have a much better outcome the rampant single mother homes that breed criminals. But it's still better to have 2 adults raising kids.

[–]Big_Chocolate_420 38 points39 points40 points 3 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

if women and girls can refuse to learn this skills and follow only their interests, but can demand these skills from men and boys.

Do the boys live early on in hard mode because they have to learn so many skills, in comparison to girls, to be accepted by society? No

if you study something in the STEM field without having a certain interest or experience in it, most likely you will have a harder time in the beginning to someone who worked in the field for years or had dozen of projects who are related to the study material.

This only means the one who is now on "easy" mode chose earlier the hard mode

when my sister-in-law or one of my nephews say they can't do something I teach it to them. If I would like to do something I am capable of I learn it

if people don't learn new skills and follow their interests they stay dumb children who complain living in hard mode as soon as they have to lift their butt for the first time

[–]JJhammertime1 points 3 years ago [recovered] (13 children) | Copy Link

Hard to blame the socialization of men and women in our society on women and girls alone. If women are socialized to not be into STEM, then the ones that eventually find themselves interested got a later start. Sounds like hard mode to me.

[–]Jesus_marley 24 points25 points26 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Sounds like the consequences of choice to me.

[–]JJhammertime1 points 3 years ago [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link

A math teacher ignoring a girl struggling to help a boy struggling is not a choice. It’s a product of socialization.

[–]gafgone5 11 points12 points13 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That shit never happened in my school. You musta went to one of those "schools" instead.

[–]Jdisgreat17 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Right?!? If anything, the girls in my upper level math classes got help first and got helped the most

[–]Jesus_marley 14 points15 points16 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't see any laws restricting girls from engaging in STEM from an early age. If they choose to enter the field later than boys how is that anyone's fault but their own?

[–]CentralAdmin 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Most teachers are women and the ones struggling most at school and getting fewer degrees are boys.

If your argument is that girls are being ignored by the teacher, it seems we should be helping boys first because they are being ignored way more.

If you claim that a teacher is being lazy and not doing what they are supposed to then fixing the exam by lowering standards isn't the answer. It's getting those teachers - again, mostly women - interested in teaching math. Math teachers are not favouring boys because they think boys are better at math. Boys take an interest in math more often.

How do we know?

Go look at the gender equality paradox that has happened in Scandinavian countries.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender-equality_paradox

When men and women grow up in the most equal and feminist countries in the world, they still tend towards certain careers. Men tend to gravitate towards more technical fields and women to more social fields. Every time they try to encourage girls to take on STEM degrees they see a bit of an increase for a while then it drops again. They need to do more than treat men and women equally to get more women into STEM, which runs counter to the very principle of equality.

If you are okay with lowering standards to get more women into a field you will simply get lower quality workers.

Additionally, there isn't anything stopping girls from taking Math and Science more seriously. They have the same resources boys have access to and they are earning more degrees than men.

By this logic should we be lowering standards for boys so more will attend university?

Whatever argument you make that favours girls and women at school and university will almost always go doubly so for boys because education has failed them even more.

[–]Zepherite 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Research and academic data shows it's the men being ignored in education. Women are given more attention, higher grades for the same work, more bursaries in higher education, and fewer punishments in early education. This is much more likely to be so if the teacher is female. The majority of the teachers most people have will be female.

The only thing girls are 'socialised' to understand is that they will always be helped when they find things difficult. The boys are socialised to understand they can only really rely on themselves. Or to put it another way, the opposite of what you propose here.

[–]Stunna4Yerks 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

sounds like your defending the consequences of they're own choices, boo hoo nobody cares it's time for them to get a REALITY CHECK

[–]Mode1961 15 points16 points17 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That hasn't been true for at least two generations; there are countless programs throughout the education system to get women/girls into STEM etc.

[–]mikesteane1 points 3 years ago [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

What evidence do you have that women are so pathetic they can't decide whether or not they want to follow a stem career?

[–]JJhammertime1 points 3 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Socialization from an early age isn’t pathetic. I don’t see any reason to call women pathetic for that.

[–]WeEatBabies 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

FTFA : Women in engineering may also have spent less time developing technical skills, Keen said.

[–]Mortago_109 17 points18 points19 points 3 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

So why do these professors think boys are less likely to graduate high school? Less likely to attend university? Get lower grades for the same work?.

[–]Misunderstood_bafoon 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s only sexism when it doesn’t benefit women.

[–]vulpine90 12 points13 points14 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Pointless article. They hypothesize the whole biased against women argument but don’t have any evidence from the exam itself. They just have data that women tend to do poorly on the exam. Except in Montana where they tend to do better. Maybe they should research what Montana engineers are doing differently instead of assuming a question can be so heavily biased a college educated person can’t answer it properly.

[–]Misunderstood_bafoon 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Women are expected to be believed with little to no evidence these days. This is just another example of this.

[–]vulpine90 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think it’s more about people browsing the news and seeing the titles of articles and not actually reading the article itself. They will see the title “Engineering Exam Biased Against Women” and scroll past without reading. But then later cite the article as if it had proof to back up their idea of feminism. I think it’s something that happens in every area nowadays.

[–]Snivelingincel 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Just remember everybody

There already exists a 2:1 female hiring bias in STEM

https://scholar.google.com/scholar_url?url=https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1418878112&hl=en&sa=X&ei=NgSvY7WWAvWSy9YPoPyb2As&scisig=AAGBfm2Wn23ooyOlooc52n8j7PLER8iIxA&oi=scholarr

[–]Misunderstood_bafoon 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But because it benefits women , then it must be fair lol

[–]bagman42069 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This is incredibly ironic. I am unsure if you guys know but there have been multiple studies over the years that show professors at unis and colleges and teachers in grade school on average will give women a higher grade for less work done. This is because they believe that women are oppressed. This could be a reason why men arent going to college as much anymore

[–]Misunderstood_bafoon 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Feminists need to keep their victim card alive to keep reaping the benefits for their grievances.

[–]B1G_Fan 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Mid 30s civil engineer with my PE license here

I took the exam relatively late in my career in 2019.

There were plenty of women taking the exam.

Also, I remember a female classmate of mine back in 2009 who went into engineering because it paid better than being a math teacher. Our senior year, she chose not to take the prerequisite exam (FE) to the PE because she was focused on filling out her application for Teach for America.

I think she's now a homeschooling mom, which is what she should have been aiming to do in the first place.

And, yes, by all accounts she's a very traditional wife and mother who frankly was lied to about how fun it is to get splinters on the corporate ladder.

TLDR: Motivation is a key component to passing the FE and PE exams. And, since being an engineer doesn't help women find the relationship with men they claim to want, studying for the PE and passing the PE isn't as high of a priority for women as it is for men.

[–]aknabi 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If it requires logic and critical thinking then yeah it’s biased against women

[–]Stunna4Yerks 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hell since there women they shouldn't even have to take to the exam, leave that hard work for men, if you make women do it it's sexist. /s

[–]Dirk_94 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How can math about unliving objects be sexist?

[–]Bliss_Cannon5 points 3 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Feminism is damaging to the sciences. Feminists are basically like flat-earthers or evolution-deniers. They reject any solid science that doesn't fit their agenda. Even worse, they harass researchers and use their political power to actually stop research from being done.

[–]MastermindX 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Don't tell anyone, but we at the patriarchy have invented a magic paper that chemically reacts to the proximity of vagina, changing the text that's written on it. We use it to make the exam harder for women.

[–]ChaosOpen 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Kind of what happens if you take in engineering students for diversity rather than because the college believes they can absorb the curriculum and get a license. They let in unqualified students to meet a quota, inflate their grades, but they suddenly slam into reality when it comes time for the exam when they can't skirt by on diversity and find out that their four years of education has been a complete lie for the university's benefit.

[–]SecondEldenLord 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Oh, you wanna talk about biased now? Pfff, this article is a fucking joke.

[–]Misunderstood_bafoon 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s only bias when women aren’t winning. If men outnumber women in a field, it’s because there is injustice and discrimination. If women outnumber men in a field, it’s because women are simply better. That’s the idea they want to subtly push in, that they’re better than men and are constantly kept in the shadows by men.

[–]griii2 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Prof Mark Perry is doing fantastic job.

[–]Sweddybob69 -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Is folding laundry classed as engineering now?

[–]darthjory 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Here we go again… good lord. 🙄

[–]Creole1789[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I guess engineering exams don't take into account feelings and emotions. Lol

[–]ApprehensiveMail8 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I passed that exam the first time. My wife took three tries.

She still makes more than me.

[–]zogins 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm a hard science graduate and the system in my country is similar to the British system. Before we can apply to join a degree course we have to obtain certificates in the 3 main advanced level sciences: chemistry, biology and physics.

Biology is by far a science dominated by women. But physics, which is absolutely necessary for engineering, does not seem to be a favourite with women. Several years ago it was being argued that women were shying away from physics because when teaching the basic concepts, male examples were being used. For example some feminists were arguing that when a subject like acceleration was being taught, the examples used by teachers were racing cars. When teaching momentum, bullets were used as examples.

[–]Damienslair 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

😂

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter