It's seems that people highly diminish how superior men are in many areas .And since people see women as more attractive than men It's fair to say At least that men proved their competency artistically, physically and intellectually through history. Every great person in history is basically a man . So It's normal for people especially young boys to seek them as a ROLE MODELS which is something that is completely ignored for young boys today while heavily advertised for young girls . Preaching about stand up by yourself for young women while telling young men they need someone is hypocritical and malicious .

One of the main examples of TOXIC MASCULINITY is the lack of emotions from men or the negative reaction from bottled emotions . At the end of day , most men feel less worthy than the men represented in media such as movies , songs, books , history . So It's justified for men to feel pressured and insatisfied . While dissatisfaction isn't vulneravility, It's easy to say that men don't show vulnerability if we neglect how much men express their dissatisfaction by complaining. People seems to refuse seing complains as expression of emotions which is hypocritical since physical weakness in men is also looked down by women and men equally so there is nothing that guarantee for men that expression vulnerability will get a different reaction .

Every great men had a bad patch , but the bad patch isn't what made him great , crying in front of a woman isn't what made young boys choose him as a role model . It's his TALENT / POWER /INTELLINGENT / ATTRACTIVENESS and 1% is due way he " RIZZ " women.

For example , people always questioned LEONARDO DICAPRIO's moral decisions and personality but no one can deny that he is one of the best actors in HOLLYWOOD'S history. So young boys who adopt LEONARDO DICAPRIO's approach would probably be labelled as "TOXIC " yet this doesn't take away the fact that they have a higher chance of succeeding in comparison of feminist or feminine men that made they way men treat women the Barometer of the quality of men which is never the case . Great men were never great because they were nice to women , women or the way of treating them was never the factor that made one men better than another .

At the end of the day, being rich isn't easy , being handsome isn't easy , being talented isn't easy , being a funny isn't easy , being charming aslo isn't easy , being a leader isn't easy , being strong isn't easy , YET MEN still excell in every metric . And just cause they don't get praised doesn't mean they aren't that good ( AT SPORT MEN SURPASS WOMEN YET PEOPLE ARE AFRAID TO ADMIT HOW SUPERIOR MEN ARE ) . So if getting less emotional , more pragmatic, and more selfish is a collateral damage that comes with choosing role models that aren't related to women ,I don't think It's bad . Men should be more focused on getting praised for everything they do instead of focusing on performing better cause even when they were performing better it was misogynistic and sexist to say so .

Men should stop listening to feminism and blue pilled men when it comes to building themselves since none of those people are their role models , SORRY BECKY but you're opinion about men wanting to be rich / wanting sex from women /and studying instead of crying isn't toxic masculinity and basically you have no say in it .

As long as people want to deny toxic feminity while equally talking about toxic masculinity when men outperformed women heavily and still yet It's sexist to say soo .!! ASK YOURSELF , WHY DO I have the right to say that women are superior than men in some areas but somehow get criticized for uplifting men and putting them above Women?!