"Skill issue" is a controversial diagnosis of failed social interactions. But let's say that skill is at least partly accountable for most social outcomes, especially in the romantic/sexual arena. Have any of you actually done something about it?

When I want to get better at playing basketball, I attend basketball practice. I watch youtube videos breaking down techniques and schemes. I learn and perform drills with quantifiable results to track progress. I hit the weight room and the track to build physical ability. Et cetera.

When I want to get better at chess, I do the same, and read books, play practice positions, use analytic tools, and so on.

What the above examples have in common is that they aren't just playing the game.

I rarely hear about anyone actually trying to something similar with “social skills.” PUA was at least an attempt, however misguided, with its preset openers, topics and segues. Maybe Red Pill has some training ideas, but all I ever see is theory and live trials.

So, if you want to dispute the claim, let’s not consider real, unstructured socializing as “trying to improve.” Technically, it can be a great, or totally useless, way to improve, depending on various factors. Those “various factors” are exactly why I’m excluding it. To paraphrase the great Allen Iverson, I’m talking about practice, not the game.