TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

a few pictures from a Detroit protest.

[deleted]

June 10, 2014
59 upvotes
/r/MensRights

https://24.media.tumblr.com/6f8514c18917f0cdcc1ebd5bbf03c3d9/tumblr_n6tm4y8hW31qap9gno2_1280.jpg

https://24.media.tumblr.com/5756965ff60cc801462b776a64a6b651/tumblr_n6tm4y8hW31qap9gno3_1280.jpg

https://24.media.tumblr.com/9a18bf4f7cb93154c2eee56263382f2c/tumblr_n6tm4y8hW31qap9gno4_1280.jpg

https://24.media.tumblr.com/d2006b3ab33413239f34067745ed1ff0/tumblr_n6tm4y8hW31qap9gno1_1280.jpg

https://31.media.tumblr.com/6663905733e18cf3ee86bd44d7da0d1b/tumblr_n6tm4y8hW31qap9gno5_1280.jpg

I'm kinda curious if half these people know what they are protesting cause it feels like the Op Wallstreet protest due to the "stop capitalism" wording.

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title a few pictures from a Detroit protest.
Author

[deleted]

Upvotes 59
Comments 93
Date June 10, 2014 2:21 AM UTC
(12 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/27r3sn/a_few_pictures_from_a_detroit_protest/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/a-few-pictures-from-a-detroit-protest.999449
https://theredarchive.com/post/999449
Red Pill terms in post
feminism

Comments

[–]theDarkAngle 40 points41 points42 points 12 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

The fact that they mention capitalism should tell you all you need to know. It's just like the SNL skit where they mentioned protesting planned parenthood.

They have no idea what the MRM is. They seem to think it's a hardcore version of neo-conservatism.

If anything the MRM seems to be full of left-leaning people who think feminists and SJW's have perverted the word "liberal", with a healthy minority of conservatives/libertarians.

That's what they don't get. The MRM is a diverse - if still relatively small - community, and that's our strength. We don't agree about everything, but there's a core set of things that even ideology cannot divide us on.

Pretty soon we will add to our ranks:

Men of color who are disproportionately affected by our misandric society.

Blue collar workers who should be seeing more work opportunities and job training, but instead are seeing resources go to female dominated sectors in the name of "fairness".

Veterans who are the biggest victims of male disposability.

Parents and especially mothers who watch their sons' lives fall apart due to our girls-first paradigm.

And women, when they realize that feminism is actually making it much harder to find a "good husband" because we consistently handicap men and provide them very little incentive to achieve.

And on and on and on from there.

[–]YetAnotherCommenter 15 points16 points17 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If anything the MRM seems to be full of left-leaning people who think feminists and SJW's have perverted the word "liberal", with a healthy minority of conservatives/libertarians.

I won't contest what you say, but please don't use "conservatives/libertarians" - conservatism and libertarianism are very different political philosophies, and just because conservatives claim to believe in free market economics does not mean they are allies to libertarianism (or that libertarians are allies of conservatives). There is rhetorical overlap between the two sides at times but frankly there is also rhetorical overlap between libertarians and liberals on many issues!

Please don't package deal.

[–]theDarkAngle 8 points9 points10 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh I totally agree. Only reason lumped them in together is that in terms of the MRM they tend to be rhetorically similar.

[–]xholly 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I agree, life long left voting Australian here, which to many of the American right basically makes me equal to a soviet era communist.

How does supporting the obvious major issues of 50% of the population make me a right winger now? Don't see this as about any politics, just basic human rights.

[–]waves_of_ignerence 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When you're dead-set against treating men as human beings, or getting off the hate-fueled money train they're addicted to and have no morals literally nothing is too low to stoop to.

Also see AMR.

[–]tjmburns 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

AnCom here. I can't believe the anarchist feminists. Modern feminism doesn't function without the state as its patriarch.

[–]HitchSlap92 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Liberal here. I concur.

[–]exovolt 23 points24 points25 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

By the looks of those messages it appears half of them arrived at the wrong protest.

[–]Ashken 10 points11 points12 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Right? Started bringing in economic issues devoid of sex.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"stop capitalism" it has nothing to do with gender or gender rights but why the fuck not eh ?

[–]lazlounderhill 45 points46 points47 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

fixed

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I like it.

[–]Hungerwolf 41 points42 points43 points 12 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

I like the part where they're wrong. So, all of it.

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points 12 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

I wonder what gender violence they talking about cause there's really been no violence from the MRM.

One person had "stop capitalism" on a sign and i'm confused of why that's mentioned.

[–]reluctantreddituser 16 points17 points18 points 12 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

The word capitalism gets thrown around allot as a synonym for whatever people like or don't like.

[–]unbannable9412 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's basically a way of saying the man without sounding like some beatnik dumbass.

[–]questionnmark 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Capitalism means: Private ownership of the means production. Socialism means: Collective ownership of the means of production.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalism

A mixed model in my opinion works quite well because you can restrain natural monopolies, and you get the benefit of having your management been trained within the private sector.

[–]Regulus777 6 points7 points8 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Are there any real examples of market monopolies? When I looked into this, all I found were government-enabled coercive monopolies. It seems that it is impossible or nearly impossible to create a monopoly without the help of the violent gang we call "government".

[–]cxj 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Standard oil did pretty good without the govt. Microsoft got trust busted or whatever iirc. I'm not a socialist but they have their points

[–]WhyNotThough 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not anymore really, once a private business becomes powerful enough to control majority 95%+ of the market share then the government would step in to break it down from that position

At one point Microsoft would have been considered a monopoly so did Exxon and Irving, but not anymore

[–]mean0dean0 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Government, in this sense, is just the middleman; it's neither good nor bad. If the government advocates for the people, then of course it will bust up trusts and monopolies; however, as you can see from the Net Neutrality debacle going on right now, if the government officials involved are lobbyists for the companies they are supposedly regulating, then you get "internet fast lanes" for rich companies and nobody else.

Government is not the problem--who government represents is the problem.

[–]reluctantreddituser 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm very familiar with these definitions (I'm a free-market anarchist) but I've heard many people redefine capitalism to suit whatever point they're making.

[–]TheAlmightyTapir 9 points10 points11 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It's the Orwellian nature of this movement. Want to make something look bad:

  1. Take term, e.g. Men's Rights, MRA etc.

  2. Add another term to describe it, e.g. patriarchy, fascism, capitalism

  3. The two are now synonymous. When you campaign against the term in Part 1, you simply campaign against the term you've described in Part 2. MRA is now facism. Nobody can argue with that, can they? I mean, who's going to defend fascism?

[–]patriarchal_overlord 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This is a very very common political tactic

[–]TheAlmightyTapir 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, and it's also one of the underpinning principles of Newspeak.

[–]Hungerwolf 17 points18 points19 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Because step 1- talk about men's issues like homelessness, suicide and genital mutilation,

Step 2-

Step 3- Profit.

[–]jpflathead 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

My interpretation is they are talking about domestic violence which they think MRAs want free reign to inflict on women. But of course, coming from academia they couldn't say it plainly, and had to put it on a sign stated so only "fellow [gender studies] travelers" would understand it.

And speaking of fellow travelers and gender studies, and I say this as someone who is mostly left myself, the anti-capitalist guy is just a typical fellow traveler there to remind us implicitly that there truly is a huge historical connection between feminist theorists and marxists.

(However, the Marxists weren't totally crazy, their bourgeoisie could at least be seen and evidenced in many many ways that the feminist equivalent patriarchy cannot.)

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A lot of these women aren't even doing this on freewill, most just come because it's just another thing to scream towards. Feminists aren't leaders, they are followers and they will go where they are instructed to go.

Patriarchy has been debunked by everyone and it doesn't even have any society or even scientific backing. I just don't believe most SJWs understand what they are fighting against.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I've actually seen that dude with his uncomfortable goofiness and that same tired sign in another protest picture last week. I think that showing up at liberal protests is like his version of CrossFit.

[–]DavidByron2 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The same reason racism and gay rights were mentioned. Feminists are not a very sympathetic bunch so they steal the legitimacy of others. against feminism? Oh you must be anti-gay and racist as well as against the poor.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Feminists love their shaming tactics, they hate criticism and so these tactics work well to shut people down.

Feminism does fuck all for the LGBT community, does nothing for blacks, etc. all their resources go to helping white women, why do you think there's a ton of benefits for them ? Hell even AA benefits white women more.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

One person had "stop capitalism" on a sign and i'm confused of why that's mentioned.

Liberalism crossed the schwarzchild radius some time ago. No coherent message can escape.

[–]EJSpurrell 8 points9 points10 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I was wondering how big this was going to be. I'm actually kind of disappointed. I was hoping it would be bigger.

It almost feels as though the detractors to the MRM aren't as numerous as I felt they were... Just loud and obnoxious.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I've heard the protest wasn't that big, just ankle biters that made noise.

Gave us public attention tho, the best thing feminism would have done was ignore us but they couldn't so free advertisements is always lovely.

[–]Kimski 8 points9 points10 points 12 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Wish I could have been there with a bullhorn. I would have walked a 100 meters ahead of them and shouted: "Bring out yer dead! Bring out yer dead!!" ;)

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

OH MUH GAWD. Died laughing.

[–]Professor_Hoover 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Are you suicidal? I think you need to see a doctor before you get yourself killed :P

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points17 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well, that was a cute little protest. I'm glad they got the chance to run around and do their little dance. I mean, it's nice for everyone to get out in the sun and stretch our limbs a bit. I'm sure the protest made them feel extra very nice about themselves. A fun social event, to be sure. Like walking to the park, or something feelgood like that. And with about as much impact on the wider community.

I appreciate the free advertisement. The more lies Feminists tell, the bigger we grow. It's like a never-ending cycle.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I was happy when the hotel told them to fuck off and didn't cave to them. A 3000 person petition is tiny, very tiny so i wasn't surprised when the hotel tossed it.

Free speech is a valuable thing in the US, it's sad some people chose to violate that right.

Edit: I wish someone would have made a video of the protest cause i wanted to watch it while eating popcorn.

[–]unclefisty 6 points7 points8 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The professionally made "boycott doubletree" signs really speak to the grass roots of this movement. /s

[–]Ironhigh 6 points7 points8 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

"STOP THE PATRIARCHY"

Isn't this the main goal of the MRM?The get rid of the extra burden and responsibilities created in the old patriarchal society ,aiming towards gender equality?

Feminists in general are not against alimony, which was a law made for women in a time where women couldn't work.

Feminists ignore the male enlistment.All it takes is a high rank person in the military to snap his fingers to start a yearly draft.Many countries that can't run their armies with 100% volunteers draft young men, where are the modern feminists that claim to want gender equality here?

Women can shut down a pregnancy in the first weeks and abort in the first months, why don't men have a parental surrender?Isn't the lack of a parental surrender for men something from the patriarchy?When women couldn't stop pregnancies legally?

Many of the issues that the MRM wants to talk about are gender inequalities caused by the patriarchy, why feminists protest against the MRAs with "STOP THE PATRIARCHY"?

[–]YetAnotherCommenter 17 points18 points19 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

why feminists protest against the MRAs with "STOP THE PATRIARCHY"?

Because according to (established/official) feminism, all of men's issues are just epiphenomena of women's issues. Thus, talking about men's issues distracts people from the fundamental problem (which is the oppression of women) and instead focuses attention on a mere side-effect.

These feminists further accuse people who want to focus on the issues men have of secretly wanting to continue "treating the symptoms rather than the disease" because they want to perpetuate the disease.

In short, they believe talking about men's issues is in and of itself perpetuating the Patriarchy. This is because, to them, the oppression of women is the fundamental element of the gender roles, and anything men suffer is a mere epiphenomenon of that.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

An amazingly well put explanation

[–]iethatis 6 points7 points8 points 12 years ago* (9 children) | Copy Link

moar:

http://31.media.tumblr.com/b8d62ed0617b7bdb938800a2649321e8/tumblr_n6tm8xjObc1qap9gno3_1280.jpg

http://37.media.tumblr.com/3ecdf800f5bb8731679fc1336f2f2fd0/tumblr_n6tm8xjObc1qap9gno2_1280.jpg

(oh please)

http://24.media.tumblr.com/1a43037a2521ea4cb01b2c0aa7815285/tumblr_n6tm8xjObc1qap9gno1_1280.jpg

(talk about hate...)

http://24.media.tumblr.com/85334952162df4c3e39d3a9a9affbc99/tumblr_n6tm8xjObc1qap9gno4_1280.jpg

(look how aggressive the one on the left is)

http://24.media.tumblr.com/15cc743b5703c8ca102b947b8d82fd03/tumblr_n6u8wa6JW71qzx76yo1_1280.jpg

(ew)

[–][deleted] 19 points20 points21 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

http://24.media.tumblr.com/1a43037a2521ea4cb01b2c0aa7815285/tumblr_n6tm8xjObc1qap9gno1_1280.jpg

Feminism is for everyone... yet there's ZERO men's issues that are being discussed side by side with women's issues. This protest proves they don't want men's issues discussed and it's clearly bigotry.

[–]jpflathead 20 points21 points22 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Feminism is for everyone, but men need to STFU and just listen.

FEMINISM IS FOR EVERYONE AND WHAT MEN NEED IS MOAR FEMINISM and let me tell you about the evil mansplaining I am oppressed with. Just STFU. I am talking.

[+][deleted] 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You also have a right to question and be skeptical of that representation. Feminism has a very muddled history where it's primary focus has been white women.

I wouldn't trust a movement that once had ties to the Klu Klux Klan.

[–]rocelot7 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

http://24.media.tumblr.com/85334952162df4c3e39d3a9a9affbc99/tumblr_n6tm8xjObc1qap9gno4_1280.jpg

The most offensive part of that was the fanny pack. She should be ashamed of herself.

[–]Regulus777 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Women unite to fight the right"? What is she even opposing? MRA has no political affiliation on the left-right spectrum (which is more or less a farce anyway).

[–]jpflathead 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I have to remark she has an adorable belly button, for realz, and I am pinching her tummy as we speak. http://i.imgur.com/QJlJDoE.jpg

[–]JakeDDrake 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

http://24.media.tumblr.com/15cc743b5703c8ca102b947b8d82fd03/tumblr_n6u8wa6JW71qzx76yo1_1280.jpg

They sure know how to draw a crowd, don't they?

[–]JakeDDrake 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link

Since when was Capitalism directly tied to The Patriarchy?

And furthermore: I'm intrigued with the wording in their signs.

People who aren't familiar with the MRA acronym are gonna see them, and associate their claims with the acronym. I've a feeling that they know if they used the term "Men's Rights Activists" that it would be harder for them to get passerby to associate that term with "Rape Culture" than with an acronym that's only really used within the confines of Gender Politics. After all, it's hard to pin an evil on a group whose outward message is that of good.

In a similar way, if we were to make signs attacking "3WFs" as opposed to "Third-Wave Feminists", we'd have an easier time associating the horrible things they've done with the acronym, than with a the latter term that has a word some people find to be morally righteous.

edit: Holy crap my wording was awful.

[–]YetAnotherCommenter 7 points8 points9 points 12 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Since when was Capitalism directly tied to The Patriarchy?

Radical Second Wave Feminism argues precisely this - it argues that Capitalism is a product of Patriarchy.

Classical Marxism, when pro-feminist, argues the reverse and claims that Patriarchy is a product of Capitalism.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

You know Marx and Engels were spot on in many of their observations, its just that many of their solutions were flawed.

If you read Communist Manifesto, you'd know there is quite a bit of truth in there about the dangers of accumulated wealth and corruption.

For me it's pretty mind boggling that such a magnum opus would have incredible flaws related to economic drivers and the role of incentive.

Marx and Engels both rationalized incentive as greed and immorality too profoundly. As brilliant as they were, they could not remain stoic enough to see the role of necessity.

[–]logrusmage 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You know Marx and Engels were spot on in many of their observations, its just that many of their solutions were flawed.

Their factual observations? Sure. Their moral observations? No. They also dropped context like a motherfucker.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wealth for a purpose I understand - limitless wealth for it's own sake is destructive. It goes beyond incentive as a driver and actually causes disincentive because of the lack of reward and upward mobility.

Marx and Engels denounced all wealth - seeing no purpose for privately accumulated capital. Its a shame, really because some of the "Seven Observations" Marx gave were brilliant - he challenges economic theory in a way that states that is much more than statistical relevancy - it's a construct social relationships - ideas, relationships, values, etc... So as the social construct changes - it also changes economic theory. Marx correctly identifies that we can pilot the ship, which is contrary to Adam Smith's ethereal force of the invisible hand.

When you combine the two ideas, what you get is admission of the sociological effect of aggregate demand coupled with the idea that it can be directed - which is an idea many people subscribe to. It also frees up independent thinking in economics in general.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

|If you read Communist Manifesto, you'd know there is quite a bit of truth in there about the dangers of accumulated wealth and corruption.

I have not read this. Could you give me the tl;dr version of the dangers and what the suggested solutions were?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh wow man - that's like trying to break down War and Peace.

[–]JakeDDrake 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So neither one can figure out whether the chicken or egg came first, eh?

That's pretty amusing.

[–]Deansdale 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I find it ironic that their symbol is a clenched fist, they march with banners with words like "smash" and "fight", but they say it's us promoting violence.

[–]ezetemp 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What, no, that's not an angry fighting fist, it's obviously a loving fist in a hole. Probably a group of proud fisting enthusiasts who've gotten a bit caught up with the wrong crowd.

[–]yuioer 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

How exactly does the MRM promote rape and violence against women?

[–]baskandpurr 8 points9 points10 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Didn't you notice the rape and violence guides in the sidebar? /s

[–]patriarchal_overlord 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Bro, hardcore feminists are so incredibly brainwashed that they are afraid to talk to men's rights activists. The "MRM promotes violence against women" is just a circlejerk between weak minded ignorant women.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I... I... the idiocy of feminism never ends. Perpetuating victim culture much, protestors?

Also, Detroit may not have been the best place for that conference, but seriously. That's bad for Detroit's standards.

[–]unbannable9412 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You know I generally expect all the "smash the patriarchy, boo capitalism" stuff to be something you see on tumblr, I know even adult feminists tend to share the same mindset, just with fancier wording, but these people look to be in their 30s or so and the sound like some angsty teenage tumblrite.

It's actually sad.

[–]ARenaissance-Man 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A delightfully tiny, pathetic protest. And they probably received media attention out of all proportion to their numbers.

[–]Stone_Morningwood 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Classy woman with the t-shirt that states, "NITE HERE! Sleep With The Right People" /s

[–]unklestinky 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Ahh the group-think is strong in the "protesters." Now if they would only do some research and critically think about what they are protesting.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That would take effort

[–]SarcastiCock 6 points7 points8 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Hired protesters get bused in.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

bribed protesters.

[–]avantvernacular 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm just glad no one got hurt.

[–]spankytheham 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wasn't there a thread of a poster asking why a lot of MRA's don't like feminism/-sts? Well...

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Smash Caplitalism! :rofl: How to know you're dealing with idiots.

[–]ion9a 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

giant sign saying "Fuck the System"

wow, how mature. I'm not even sure how that pertains to an MRA meeting though...

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

bunch of young Marxists

[–]Gittiup 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They haven't a clue...

[–]Sharpie1306 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Its funny how quickly some of these people may change there view of the MRM if they took some time to research and understand it and not just jump on the bandwagon, i understand tho that some of them are very set in there ways and will try to find a flaw in the MRM but i dont think its possible to have something in society that is flawless, so why should the MRM have to be flawless to change there views.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The MRM has it's flaws, no movement is flawless but the strength of the MRM makes me proud. It's strength the feminism movement never seemed to gain cause anytime a woman killed or was even mentioned around feminism they never denied it, they celebrated it.

Feminism is doing a good job tho.... as being free advertising for the MRM and showing that the MRM is the better movement.

[–]Sharpie1306 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree with you completly :) im just saying the more casual feminist may find more of a balance with the MRM if they did a bit of research instead of just assuming its bad cause of all the feminists who say so.

The MRM is amazing when it comes to understand and making people(even people who are against it) feel welcome to have a discussion or a debate, witch isnt possible in feminism as every idea that isnt theres is shot down and censored in a heartbeat.

So yeah im new to the MRM and i will gladly back it because i believe i its message and what it is trying to do :)

Also the fact that it has flaws makes it seem more true, i could never trust something perfect tbh lol

[–]MRSPArchiver 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Post text automatically copied here. (Why?) (Report a problem.)

[–]TheBiboSez -2 points-1 points0 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

From the last picture:

"Smash patriarchy" = openly promoting violence against men,

"Fuck capitalism" = openly promoting the rape of business owners.

Meaning = feminists openly promote violence and rape.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

capitalism really has nothing to do with violence. It's just occupy wallstreet style integration that's weird for a feminist protest.

[–]nick012000 6 points7 points8 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Not really, when you think about it. What is feminism, but gender-based Marxism? It shouldn't really be that surprising that other forms of Marxist thought start showing up in a feminist protest, should it?

[–]unbannable9412 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol why are you being downvoted?

This angsty "capitalism is the source of all evil" shit is very typical of feminists.

[+][deleted] 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You're not wrong.

[+][deleted] 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]TheBiboSez 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The one dude wearing a dress was kind of cute.

[+]freemale101 -8 points-7 points-6 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ha Ha. I did a double take...a bloke wearing a dress!! A real mangina! And as dopey as you'd expect fusing the 'Patriarchy' with Capitalism. Now for any feminist manginas lurking here, reading this, take note: "Pussy" is one of the main drivers of greedy Capitalism. Dear ol Karl Marx pointed out the Bad Guys etc..."Owners" and "Landlords" (his words). He NEVER suggested that it was a Conspiracy of Gender..i.e 'Patriarchy' So the mangina lefty sociology tinpot 'scholars' better factor this into their oppression modelling. Still great photo. Classic!!!

[+]DesignRed -20 points-19 points-18 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I liked the "We won't go back" poster, made me think she meant back to Africa.
All I saw was 4 posters, with 4 different distilled messages. Not the greatest at organization, but 10/10 for feels.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter