Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.
It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.
I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.
Support the archive
[–]gratis_eekhoorn[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children) | Copy Link
Do not vote/comment in the crossposted sub, it's against reddit's rules.
[–]VanillaAbstract 89 points90 points91 points (17 children) | Copy Link
That thread is sad. Men are talking about their own life experience and angry women are shouting at them for not understanding why women don't like being cat called. It seems like everyone fully understands that catcalling women is bad and makes them feel bad, but this is a chance for those women to try to understand someone else's experiences instead. But it's like they forgot the post is a question directed at men and are treating them as intruders on the conversation. Many posters in the thread are describing how even if it's harassment they still feel good about someone seeing them as not disgusting. This is something I've heard about being a problem for women as well when they have low self esteem so I don't know why it's such a hard concept to grasp.
[–]MathematicianTop6153 49 points50 points51 points (2 children) | Copy Link
Men can't talk about themselves or their issues without women talking about how hard it is for them and hijacking the conversation. Questions like these are usually bait for men to be blamed for women's problems. They think men don't understand that women don't like being cat called as if most of us don't know that already.
[–]Least_Limit_3636 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
We should stop women card
[–]gavkahootsmasher1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
No wonder misogyny is getting more rampant
[–]Infestedwithnormies 35 points36 points37 points (1 child) | Copy Link
Men bad.
[–]Least_Limit_3636 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Women bad
[–]lemons7472 18 points19 points20 points (3 children) | Copy Link
This happens anytime a man says he wouldn’t mind catcalling from a woman, or when a man strictly says that he didn’t mind it in his experince. They try to MAKE him hate it, or accuse men of not being able to understand why women hate it, even though those men never stated anything that hints that they don’t understand women who hate it. They outright make it seem like the men who say they wouldn’t mind catcalling, are the same men who catcall women.
And it’s pathetic how whenever they see other men saying “hey I wouldn’t mind being catcalled by women” and try to discredit those men by saying that they’d hate it if it were a dangerous looking man. No duh, he’s not attracted to men! Heck, some men DON’T even mind that, but it’s ridiculous to try and FORCE him to not like being catcalled all because some women don’t like it, meaning that now the men must either hate it, or else they are all emphatic brutes. The people that try to force men to hate it happening to them, might as well say the equivalent of:
“Hey, some women like having lots of sex too much with their partners. Let’s force them out of liking sex with their partner by instead making their partner into a homeless dirty person off the street that’s armed with a broken bottle”
[–]JohnGoodman_69 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Preach! Also peep this https://imgur.com/a/M5VuvP4
[–]Grow_peace_in_Bedlamleft-wing male advocate 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
Oh yeah, they always make it a gay man hitting on a straight man, as if that's at all comparable to a straight man hitting on a straight women, i.e., one person hitting on another with a compatible sexual orientation.
If they really want to be honest with their comparisons, it should be an extreme outlier of a woman who's stronger and heavier than most men and who may or may not be attractive. Even then, it's an imperfect comparison, because most women are attracted to men who are bigger than them, while very few men have an amazon fetish (even though I think most men would date a woman at least a little taller than him as long as he could have her assurance that she wouldn't try to emasculate him or hold it against him, let alone leave him for a taller guy).
Additionally, I've never minded gay men telling me they find me attractive as long as they don't touch me without my consent.
[–]lemons7472 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Agreed, the reason why they always use big intimidating gay men as a scapegoat as a way to try and force men into being uncomfortable in that scenaro of getting catcalled or sexualized, even tho those same men said they wouldn’t mind it, is because those women already know that it’s very uncertained on if a man will even dislike being sexualized by a woman anyways, even if it’s from an ugly woman or a woman that happens to be taller or bigger than him (then again most of the women in that post do not even think it’s possible for a men to be shorter or thinner than a woman, and think it’s impssoble for men to be intimidated by women).
What’s funny is that like you, some men will also say they don’t even mind being catcalled from other big men in their experiences. People who use this “you wouldn’t like it if a big intimidating man did it-“ logic already assumed that every straight man will hate it from other men.
Lots of men don’t even mind it from a “ugly” woman too. They might not partically be into it, but they won’t see her as a societal creep, and may even see it as a compliment all the same. This doesn’t mean every man will feel comforable with it however, but a lot see it as a compliment from either male or female.
[–]Nochnichtvergeben 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
The last time I saw a post like that it was closed down fairly quickly by female mods. So the fact that it's still up is progress, I guess.
[–]JohnGoodman_69 6 points7 points8 points (3 children) | Copy Link
I think this post covers this really well. https://imgur.com/a/M5VuvP4
Resorting to cat calling, a pretty extreme example, is already making us work from the base of fighting a strawman. Lets use the idea of sexual attention instead. The adult conversation that can't be had is that women DO WANT sexual attention. Women (typically) do more things to more of an extent to sexualize themselves than men (typically) do. If you suggest to women they desexualize themself they become apoplectic.
The selection bias they resort to is always "on days when I didn't dress up men still approached me" when a) we have no idea of what "didn't dress up" means to that particular person, and b) we have experiments performed that shows when women dress modestly it does affect the amount of sexual attention they receive and c) hardly anything is 100%. Its like arguing not to wear a seatbelt because you might still get hurt in an auto accident even though a seat greatly increases your odds of surviving and decreases risk of significant injury. Same concept.
Then, I've seen for myself what happens to women when they stop getting this attention or don't get it at all. Lurk the subs where women have trouble attracting men and they'll say themselves they wished they did experience the things that other women complain about and could feel sexualized. I've seen them say it again and again.
Finally, someone once posted one of the best questions I've ever seen "Hetero Women: would you trade desirability for guaranteed safety from sexual assault?" and the overwhelming response was no.
This was the case for me. Woman grabbed my ass in the bar and made me feel like a million bucks.
[–]Grow_peace_in_Bedlamleft-wing male advocate 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Also, remember the article that professional feminist Jessica Valenti wrote about being disappointed, despite her feminist views on objectification, that she wasn't getting catcalled as much as she was pushing 40 and felt undesirable and invisible because of it. However, rather than admit that it's normal for people to want to feel desired by the sex that is the object of one's sexual orientation, she had to blame the patriarchy for forcing her to care about men's opinions of her sexual desirability.
[–]Grow_peace_in_Bedlamleft-wing male advocate 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Also, you touch on something important. I think many women (especially feminist leaning ones who believe in male privilege the strongest) think that, in terms of sexual attention, living as a man is the same as living as a woman, just without any harassment. I think they also imagine that, if they were men, they would be the kind of men they're attracted to rather than the male version of themselves (i.e., their fathers, brothers, cousins, etc.).
I wish there were a politically correct way to say this, but they really seem blind to the fact that the very same mechanism that makes them susceptible to unwanted sexual advances also ensures that they are approached by guys they like from time to time, thus allowing them to form relationships and avoid loneliness without having to face the harsh rejection faced by the sex that's expected to pursue. They don't understand that being susceptible to unwanted sexual attention and being able to avoid being forever alone while playing a passive role in dating are two sides of the same coin.
To be very clear, I'm not saying harassment is justifiable at all. I don't condone it. However, I do want women to know that, while most men are not regularly sexually harassed, the other side of the coin is that they have to create their own opportunities with high rates of demoralizing rejection or else seriously risk being forever alone.
[–]ReenPinturlo 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
I get why you feel that way, but you shouldn't really feel good about her grabbing you like that. That's disrespectful.
[–]POO_IN_A_LOO 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
I agree, reading some of those comments made me uncomfortable. At first I couldn't pinpoint the exact reason why, but after some thought I came to the idea that the differing perspectives do not actually overlap. The discussion is leaving out a lot of context because we're talking about the similar end result of differing chains of events. I felt that a lot of the discussion left out that there is a vast spectrum of men and that so called male privileges only pertain to a subset, but also that the negatives of being male start to accumulate nearing the other end of the spectrum. This set of men who are destitute of agency in a world where a man's worth is dependent on his actions is invisible, in the sense that people incorrectly attribute male specific privilege and hardships to evenly distribute across the male spectrum, while realistically society imposes an ever changing list of pre-requirements or standards to qualify a man to benefit from being a man and the further you are from qualifying the more you are dehumanized to being an unfortunate and destructive statistic, disposable garbage if you will.
It's like when people tell men to cope with something they assume that someone privileged is complaining, when really the situation could be that the privileges are enjoyed by someone else over yonder while the accumulation of the negative sides of being a man are here manifested in the person doing the complaining.
I think this is sort of spectrum is true for genders, and while society imposes standards the contrast of the outcome is far more severe in men, as general empathy for men is far lower due to being treated as being mostly responsible for their own circumstances, both individually and as a group when it comes to negatives, but undeserved privileges when regarding positives. I think it would do us all good to instead of becoming sad to develop ways to communicate this and to better understand that we too have this sort of perception based bias when it comes to women's issues to help us strive for equality. There are a lot of invisible women too and we should recognize that.
Sorry for the wall of text, I got carried away.
edit: a bit of rewording and clarification
[–]fire_and_ice_7_5 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Exactly shit like this that is the reason more men don’t open up about their feelings, why they bottle things up. Just had a discussion with my wife recently and she was going on about men needing to feel like they can open up more. I mentioned to her how often times when they try, they get ostracized for not saying the right thing, or their words get weaponized against them, and how when men try to form male support groups at places like universities, they often face backlash from feminist groups trying to get them shut down (attempts that are many times successful). It’s really no wonder the left has a hard time getting more support from young men.
[–]gavkahootsmasher1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
No fucking wonder misogyny is getting more rampant.
[–]WhyDidntITextBack 34 points35 points36 points (2 children) | Copy Link
Honestly. I’ve always kinda craved it. Being seen as an object of desire.
I don’t blame women for not enjoying it. When you’re always bombarded with unwanted attention it probably gets exhausting. But, as a man who typically doesn’t get too much positive attention from women I’ve always wanted to be seen like that.
—
That being said, in all likelihood, if I was to be objectified it would probably be for what I can do, provide, give, etc. Men and women are objectified in different ways. Typically.
[–]Due_Wish7947[S] 9 points10 points11 points (1 child) | Copy Link
Yeah, I think that’s the larger problem to discuss here. Objectification applies equally to men as it does to women albeit in different ways. Women, as it is commonly perceived, are more sexually objectified. But what is much less talked about is men being reduced to what they can do and provide, a different form of objectification.
[–]Consistent-Height544 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
There is a lot of it in men who are physically objectified.
[–]HulkPower 16 points17 points18 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Depends on the man and the degree of objectification.
[–]Fickle-Cartoonist466 33 points34 points35 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Compliments ≠ Objectification, btw
I appreciate being genuinely complimented on my appearance
I do NOT enjoy being catcalled
[–]Vegetable_Camera5010 points [recovered] | Copy Link
Depends on the men. Every man is different. I don't like compliments. Since I have issues with getting validation and approval from others. And compliments always bring up my feelings of being anti validation and approval.
[–]lemons7472 7 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
That’d depend heavily on your ideals and the man In question’s own idea of what is objectification. I say this because a lot of the time objectifcation is used more like a buzzword.
With that being said, many of the comments themselves seem to once again delve into “power dynamics” of how a man won’t feel threaten by a group of women like how men feel threatened by a group of men, with the assumption and whatnot that the man does it for power and whatnot, and the woman can’t really harm the man because he’s bigger or intimidating or whatever sterotype you wanna throw in order to make it seem like men are invincible and cannot be sexually harmed because it doesn’t fit the narrative of the “power dynamic”. Therefore men cannot understand what it’s like to be threatened because of being catcalled, when really, those men may simply just like the compliment.
In reality, power dynamics don’t really matter as much because the situation can be more nuanced than that. That’s why you still get male rape victims of women.
Edit: what’s funny is that a few of the comments DO say they didn’t like it in there experience, yet those comments get fucked over too due to the logic of “oh Power Dynamics, those women cannot harm or make you feel uncomfortable” that most of the comments believe. This post wasn’t made or even used to understand men despite directing male opinion, it’s just used to scapegoat and vilify men like what this comment brought up. https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/CoRlQk31Tr
[–]lemons7472 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Oh and I absolutely hate how even one of the comments outright says that men cannot be raped the same way women can be:
“Men don’t get the “danger factor” from women that women get from men. Men cannot be raped by women (at least not in the same way) and men are (generally) physically stronger so cannot be overpowered. Maybe that’s why?”.
This is where my issue with ideals like the whole “power dynamic” thing comes from. 1-sided hyper focus of gender power dynamics like these goes as far to see gatekeep rape because of the assumption that the woman is too weak to violently rape a man, that women cannot overpoweringly rape. But power dynamics, are diffetnet from reality, hence how there are male rape victims who have been overpowered and raped by women anyways, whether you held him in his sleep and he was too weak to do anything, you drugged him, or because your still strong enough to get on top of him anyways. There is no such thing as ‘passively’ raping a person, so I don’t agree at all with her comment.
[–]karspearhollow 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
It feels good to feel physically desired. It feels bad for that to be the only thing valued about you. Objectification doesn’t cross that line on its own.
[–]Wauron 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
A good analogy is that women are drowning in sexual attention while men are starved of it. Neither is pleasant.
[–]Grow_peace_in_Bedlamleft-wing male advocate 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Why do they always make it another man catcalling the man? If it's a straight woman complaining about being catcalled by a man, wouldn't a more apt analogy be a man being catcalled by a rare bigger, stronger woman?
It just seems dishonest to me to use a straight man being catcalled by someone of the same sex as a comparison to a straight woman being catcalled by someone of the opposite sex, because for a straight person being catcalled by someone of the opposite sex, there's at least the potential for attraction and a positive reaction.
[–]WanabeInflatable 6 points7 points8 points (1 child) | Copy Link
Men are objectified by women as ATMs, and it is not fun.
[–]Due_Wish7947[S] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah I think that’s part of the unique way that men are objectified. Not that women aren’t objectified in this way (such as younger guys scamming older women) or that men can’t be sexually objectified as women are (which is probably far more common than what feminists are willing to admit. In fact, I’d argue A LOT of women are guilty of doing things that if the shoe were put on the other foot would be seen as sexual assault or domestic violence) but this is a common experience with men and it’s unfortunate that it’s not framed as objectification.
[–]Archangel1313 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Can't speak for everyone, but I certainly do. Slap my ass and call me pretty, anytime.
[–]Poyri35left-wing male advocate 5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
I can’t speak for others, if they enjoy it then they enjoy it, there is nothing wrong with that.
But most of the comments in that thread seem to me like they are either women who say that men cannot be objectified, or men that can’t see the difference between compliments and objectification.
Also, the questions of the poster is inherently wrong imo. (Paraphrasing a little) “Do men enjoy unwanted attention from women”. If the attention is unwanted, then that means the recipient doesn’t want it. Why would they enjoy something they don’t want?
[–]Due_Wish7947[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Yes excellent point. Unwanted would presumably entail non-enjoyment. And as other commenters have said here who have experienced this, but being sexually objectified as a man by a woman is every bit as demeaning as the other way around. I get that it’s not as common for men, but again as other commenters have pointed out here, the ways how men are objectified is by how they can materially provide for women (as one said, women view men as “ATMs”). But just scrolling through that thread and reading some of the comments here, it’s interesting to hear how objectification manifests itself towards men and how it’s not framed that way in feminist and gender discourse
[–]Global-Bluejay-3577left-wing male advocate 9 points10 points11 points (1 child) | Copy Link
I'm amab but nb. So maybe I don't count
No. I work out a lot so I am muscular and have long hair along with that. I really do not appreciate people grabbing my muscles or touching my hair without permission. Just because I present as a cishet man does NOT give you permission to sexually harass me
[–]Spiritual_Collar6912 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Muscular cishet black dude with an afro here. I can relate. Ive had people all over the sexuality and gender spectrum do crap like this to me while working in security. It's like they forget common decency.
[–]jkozuch 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Nope. Cannot stand it, personally.
[–]callipygiancultist 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
I really, really want to be physically desired for my body, and not because I did a certain action or achieved some conventional marker of success it performed masculinity correctly. I would also enjoy being fetishized for my hair color or some other aspect of my body. Yeah not just appreciated but straight up fetishized. I’m ginger and I’ve gotten shit for it over the years and I can very clearly see the societal attitudes towards red haired people (red hair women= exotic, spicy, fiery red hair men= goofy unattractive weirdos). To be seen as inherently desirable would do wonders for my psychological stability.
People generally respect my intelligence (although with adhd I can sometimes be treated like an idiot), I get compliments on my clothing and fashion all the time, I get complements at work all the time for my work ethic and performance and I’ve even gotten a lot of praise for being safe/ someone who could “hold space”. And while I appreciate those compliments, if I’m honest they just don’t do it for me and I just want to be desired for who I inherently am and not because of achievements or performing masculinity correctly. The few times in life where I have gotten compliments on my physical appearance have stuck with me far more than praising my intelligence or work ethic. I just don’t think women understand how crazy making it is to feel like you’ve constantly need to fight and battle to be seen as worthy as a human being.
[–]Due_Wish7947[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Some may judge you for this but I sympathize. I feel like I’m in a similar position. I wasn’t the most attractive person growing up, received very little attention from the opposite sex, and began to go bald very early in life. After a lot of effort and a LOT of money, I’d say I’ve become at least passingly attractive but the scars still linger. Like you, I’ve been complemented for various abilities but none of them stick like being complemented for my looks (on the rare occasion I receive them). If that’s objectification, then it’s understandable why people don’t mind being objectified.
Women of course go through similar struggles, but they typically have better support structures and more robust industries to help them with these problems if that’s what they face. Women are more likely to be complimented by both women AND men. Women are more visible in social spaces (which, to their point, can be a double edged sword). But feminism as whole has failed to appreciate or understand how most men feel invisible to most of the population so it shouldn’t be much of a surprise that many men would prefer being “objectified” to being ignored altogether.
[–]country2poplarbeef 5 points6 points7 points (5 children) | Copy Link
It depends on the guy, but I'd default to no. I think some guys would think they like being objectified, but I think that's because they don't really understand what it would look like in practice. Men would definitely love being admired and told they're handsome or flirted with or that sort of thing. But objectification is really about disregarding somebody's personhood and treating them like an object or a tool, and I think when you frame it like that, a lot of guys can actually understand what it means to be objectified and how it feels.
Just tbc, please don't take this as me saying the catcalling or any other way women are objectified is "admiration." As a man, I personally have my own issues with being objectified much like women are (not a humblebrag or anything, I... was a cute kid) so I generally do understand where both men and women are coming from when it comes to being objectified. I just think, on average, men experience objectification differently and while there's certainly still a good slice of guys who like being objectified, I would say the majority of men don't really enjoy it.
[–]Due_Wish7947[S] 6 points7 points8 points (1 child) | Copy Link
Totally. You have to stop and consider what is meant by “objectification”. Being reduced to an object of desire and not as person is degrading (unless you’re into that sort of thing). Women aren’t being trivial when they throw that word out there and if you’re a guy who’s been groped working at a bar, been SA’d, etc, etc, you know exactly what that means.
I think what is interesting about that thread is that some have framed objectification in terms of class struggle, like men being reduced to objects of physical labor for exploitation (not that women aren’t exploited in similar regard, but you get the idea). I’m a little embarrassed to say, but I’ve never thought of it that way.
[–]Karmaze 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Fwiw, if you go and read the original article by Nussbaum, it's much less focused on sexual attraction. The more materialist aspects of the concept have largely been filtered out, I think because of the objectifying nature of academia, and it's use of gross stereotypes and assumptions in the social sciences.
[–]Suspicious-Yam5111 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
What is objectification in this context? Because I've heard people argue that compliments are objectifying in the bad way.
[–]country2poplarbeef 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
Being used as a tool towards an end, with no particular attachment to the tool or appreciation of the tool's function. Like having a pair of shoes you really loved that lasted you for years but they finally fall apart and you find out the vintage models they make these days aren't as good quality anymore, so you just move on to a different brand. You might have said one day years ago that those shoes were the best shoes you've ever worn and that they'd keep you safe from any elements. But now, all those compliments were meaningless and every time you talk about those old shoes, the only thing that matters is that they aren't as useful as they once were.
As you might be able to tell, one's sensitivity to and perception of objectification can be influenced and amplified by past relationships being projected onto current experiences in an effort to protect themselves. As a result, whether such objectification can be considered bad or good is often dependent on whether the satisfaction of being useful outweighs the insecurity of being disposable.
[–]captainhornheart 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
I've never fully understood what objectification means, to be honest. It's a vague shorthand for a number of things, and that vagueness is probably useful to some people. A term like "discrimination" has an unambiguous, literal and testable meaning - to treat someone differently based on who they are - but objectification is always a metaphor for something else. I don't find it useful or interesting.
[–]Due_Wish7947[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
I don’t think that objectification is ever a desired thing, at least for most people. But I think it’s an interesting discussion on that post in the way how some people frame objectification for men in terms of disposability in war and in working class terms
[–]dadijo2002 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
To an extent, like sure some of that attention might be nice in specific contexts but like not if it starts getting weird. Flirting with me on a night out? Sure that’s awesome. Flashing me your bra and then proceeding to twerk on me while I’m just trying to walk home? Yeah mayyyyybe not (true story)
[–]Onyxx_Drako 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
No, objectification hurts men too. Next question.
[–]Former_Range_1730left-wing male advocate 1 point2 points3 points (4 children) | Copy Link
Of course...if she's cute.
I actually hate it when over weight, masculine women hit on me.
[–]Peptocoptr 7 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
At least you're honest, and I take it you don't consider these ugly masculine women to be aggressors just because they did something you would have allowed if they were hot enough?
[–]Former_Range_1730left-wing male advocate 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Exactly. I don't consider them as aggressors. I just don't like their attention.
[–]Wauron 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
Even masculine and over weight women would make me blush if they catcalled me tbh. As long as they don't get physical (whether they're pretty or not) I'm ok with it.
[–]Former_Range_1730left-wing male advocate 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
I like it when pretty women get physical with me.
That's cool that the masculine women wouldn't bother you if they cat called.
My issue may stem from, when I was a young teen, I was very short, and very young looking. The over weight masculine girls where always much, much taller, and when they tried to flirt with me, they always came across as.....like.....masculine dudes.
A masculine gay/bi dude trying to aggressively flirt with me, which has happened, alarms me because he could physically try to force himself on me since I was always smaller. So when masculine women would aggressively come at me, it felt....weird. Like as if this is a male trying to take advantage.
Now, many years later, I'm fit, have muscle, still look young for my age when I shave, but it's less of an issue. But still bothers me.
[–]See_You_Space_Coyote2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
Men aren't a monolith or a hive mind so the answer will vary depending on the man.
[–]Least_Limit_3636 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
I am surprised about how gynocentric our society is
[–]eternal_kvitka1817 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Can you pls clarify that's it's only heterosexual and bisexual men? cz gay men don't care about it all.
[–]Least_Limit_3636 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Stop your toxic feminism
[–]rey_nerr21 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
I don't think ANY normal person of any gender likes being objectified unless it's literally just a kink of theirs.