TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

So much for "Bodily Autonomy" ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

jhld

July 19, 2022
258 upvotes
/r/MensRights

Postmortem Sperm Retrieval Is Turning Dead Men Into Fathers

​

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2022-07-19/sperm-extraction-technique-turns-dead-men-into-fathers

Archived from /r/MensRights

r/MensRights is a community advocating for the social and legal equality of men and boys since 2008.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/MensRights archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title So much for "Bodily Autonomy" ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Author

jhld

Upvotes 258
Comments 91
Date July 19, 2022 5:51 PM UTC
(4 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/w2yv2n/so_much_for_bodily_autonomy_ツ/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/so-much-for-bodily-autonomy.1209329
https://theredarchive.com/post/1209329
Top posts by jhld

I have no words for this — "How To Hurt Men: Self Defense for Women and MaGes"

517 upvotes
May 27, 2022
/r/MensRights

Gawd - can’t a guy even watch a documentary about cute kitty cats w/o jabs about men?

135 upvotes
August 31, 2022
/r/MensRights

I can see the Jada spin starting

65 upvotes
April 9, 2022
/r/MensRights

This Timothy Busfield situation is the perfect example of why NO names of either party should ever be released to the public until after settlement or conviction

55 upvotes
January 23, 2026
/r/MensRights

Push for Gender Equality in Tech? Some Men Say It’s Gone Too Far

43 upvotes
September 25, 2017
/r/MensRights

Corrections on Jackson Katz' comments about how men are always the aggressors

41 upvotes
October 16, 2017
/r/MensRights

Here's a little positivity from the 82yo mom at my neighbourhood sushi spot. Posted behind the counter.

39 upvotes
September 9, 2024
/r/MensRights

Found this elsewhere, and it seems relevant to this group

30 upvotes
October 23, 2017
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]TwizzyMK 185 points186 points187 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

If his wishes are clearly outlined in a legal Will that had been prepared by the man prior to death then I’m fine with it. This however, is a big problem:

"In the US, regulations vary by state; the practice is reserved mostly for widows who can attest that their husbands wanted kids this way".

Nope nope nope.

[–]Bland-fantasie 63 points64 points65 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well if she attests it, all he has to do is deny it in an affidavit from the grave. See, they thought this through /s

[–]AlohaChris 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

That’s rape.

[–]Nacht_Waya 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nope.it'd be Necrophilia.

[–]TwizzyMK 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Let's put aside whatever crazy definition of rape you have that doesn't include sexual intercourse or penetration... In my scenario consent is clearly given.

This could ethically be considered as equivalent to leaving property in a will, or donating organs.

[–]AlohaChris 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Sorry man, I thought I was commenting on the original article, not your hypothetical. Yeah, I agree you could definitely will any body part you want ahead of time.

WITHOUT A WILL - it’s reproduction without consent, and that’s the definition of rape.

[–]TwizzyMK 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Oh fair enough mate. Didn't mean to jump down your throat.

[–]AlohaChris 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No worries.

[–]needs_grammarly 66 points67 points68 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

grave robbing

[–]mindset_grindset 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Zombie baby's

[–]Nacht_Waya 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Necrophilia

[–]dmann27 127 points128 points129 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

"Postmortem sperm retrieval" is one of the scariest phrases I've ever heard.

Next they can get child support from the dead guy's family

[–]mindset_grindset 17 points18 points19 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

zombie babies

[–]Dr_Skeleton 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Zombabies

[–]mixing_saws 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think thats the goal here.

[–]Mode1961 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's not for CHILD support per se BUT a portion of his estate.

[–]bigez526 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I think that's the next progressive step. Take sperm from mummies. Force families to pay. Legalized slavery.

[–]ebonyudders 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The only progressive and completely equitable way

[–]KazukiYahashi 56 points57 points58 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

This is insane lol

[–]hehimCA 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I mean we’ve only got 8 billion people on the planet. Clearly we need to rob sperm from dead people to create more.

[–]KazukiYahashi 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yup, instead of ensuring there is better care for those already alive.

[–]NottaScammer 72 points73 points74 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Is their estate required to pay child support? Wait for the lawsuits…

[–]Schadrach 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I doubt that, but I'd bet you the kid is entitled to a share of the estate, like any other child of the deceased.

[–]AirSailer 28 points29 points30 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

When parents of a dead soldier go on Facebook or TV seeking a mother for their future grandkid—not only a surrogate but also a kind of daughter-in-law who’ll raise the child—the response can be overwhelming. Hundreds of women volunteer in a display of national solidarity and what seems to be a growing preference for a sperm donor who isn’t anonymous and whose family will be involved.

And I'll bet the Israel government also pays these women... Of course there are plenty of volunteers. Having multiple children from multiple dead baby daddies where the government is paying full survivor benefits to her for each one, sure seems like a pretty good deal for the women.

[–]CawlinAlcarz 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Israel has a bit of a different "go forth and multiply" directive baked into their culture.

However, in the US, I would be concerned about the estates and families of wealthy dead men, given the states' proclivities to covet Title IV-D incentives.

[–]az226 46 points47 points48 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

This is a scary precedent. Imagine a young billionaire, who presumably doesn’t have a will and is unmarried, could hypothetically be killed, and have his sperm harvested to produce a child immediately afterward, and lay claim to the estate on behalf of the child.

[–]yettobekilledbydeath 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Don't you at least have to be alive when a relative dies to be entitled to inherit? Honest question, because I got no clue.

[–]az226 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I don’t think so. Imagine an alternative scenario where a dad-to-be dies while his domestic partner is 8-months pregnant and he has no will. Why would his kid not get the inheritance?

[–]yettobekilledbydeath 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

OK, now I had to look it up (at least for German law): The unborn child is entitled to inherit right after procreation, but it would be maintained by the "legal guardian"(?), probably the mother, until the age of 18. This is just a very superficial translation, so not necessarily 100% correct.

Would be interesting what would happen if someone claims it's not the biological child... but that's a topic for a real lawyer who gets paid for that sh...

[–]Itchy-Rough-551 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Get me off this rock

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]bfte2 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Necromancy.

[–]mixing_saws 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Their blood relatives?

[–]nomore560 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don’t know man. 1000s of women rocking up to your funeral and asking your father if they can be the mother of your child.

This was not an easy read. Imagine your child’s mother is a psycho underneath. There’s nothing you can do.

[–]bottleblank 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Agree it beforehand, put it in the will, or get some other written and legally validated form of consent, or no deal. Respect dead men, respect their wishes.

[–]ProphetOfChastity 59 points60 points61 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Bodily autonomy is one of those concepts that is bandied about like it is a sacred principle but is really only selectively invoked when convenient to achieve some specific goal or policy. The moment that bodily autonomy is inconvenient it is cast aside. I am experiencing a lot of shadenfreud right now over the abortion issue. For the last 2 years I warned pro covid lockdown leftists and feminists that they will regret being so smug about stomping all over medical decision making and consent and now that the shoe is on the other foot they have suddenly rediscovered the importance of bodily autonomy.

[+]Nitrosoft1 -15 points-14 points-13 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

We just wanted to save lives. Wearing a mask is not an infringement on rights. Unless you were fervently against "no shirt, no shoes, no service" policies prior to covid starting then you don't have much of a leg to stand on with the "muh freedoms" angle. People are only anti-mask because they're edgy contrarians with a victim complex who just have to push back for the sake of being rebellious.

Meanwhile, the adults in the room were trying to you know... keep people from dying. Sadly the tantrums the toddlers threw kept that from happening to the tune of hundreds of thousands of preventable excess deaths.

Masks, unlike pregnancies, CAN be removed by the wearer whenever they want, yes even in the third trimester of the mask wearing timeline. There's no law that said you couldn't terminate your mask wearing whenever you wanted. Terminating your mask wearing didn't require a waiting period. Not one single American went to jail for refusing to wear a mask or for terminating their mask wearing. There's no law that said, "if your mask wearing is non-viable such as putting a plastic bag on your head, that you are forced to wear it while it slowly kills you." Nobody held you down and stapled a mask to your face for 9 months against your will.

Trying to make some equivalency between masks and pregnancy as some sort of "gotcha" for bodily autonomy is absolutely ridiculous. But if we gotta play that game, I promise you I'll play it better than you can.

Leave women alone and let them make the right choices for themselves with their doctors and if they so choose their god as well.

Be a good neighbor and don't ignore or actively oppose rational steps to mitigate the spread of deadly and highly contagious illnesses.

Call me smug if you must, I'll wear it like a badge of honor.

[–]GiveMeAFunnyUsername 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

But if we gotta play that game, I promise you I'll play it better than you can.

Bet she felt REAAAL badass after saying that.

[–]ProphetOfChastity 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hah. I stopped reading after "we just wanted to save lives". That is one of the identifiers of a twitter NPC who has come to deliver their pre-programmed talking points.

[–]odysseytree 18 points19 points20 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So to have a child that will become a heir of his property.

[–]oldaccountblocked 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So women probably will be able to take dead men’s sperm, get pregnant, and claim child support from the family of the dead men?

[–]oafsalot 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

You have to be alive to have bodily autonomy. I'm not entirely sure what happens to an estate if a child is born after death or even conceived after death.

[–]UnconventionalXY 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

There's enough of a problem harvesting organs from unwilling donors: don't add to it by providing an additional incentive to kill a man to harvest his sperm.

Society needs fundamental rights to bodily sovereignty enshrined in law: it will cover many areas including this one as the default will be no consent and to vary it will require formal notarised consent, no exceptions.

[–]oafsalot 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I a lot of countries Organs are opt out not opt in. So sperm is something that can technically already be used.

I dunno, perhaps we need clauses in our laws for this sort of thing. Exigent circumstances may appear where is prudent to harvest sperm and eggs from the dead. And yes, I'm assuming a male partner would now have rights to a dead female partners eggs if they had a womb waiting.

[–]GnomeChompy 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I a lot of countries Organs are opt out not opt in.

Ahh right. I forgot that silence implies consent. /s

Honestly, unless someone explicitely consents when they are alive, the government should have zero right to that persons corpse.

[–]oafsalot 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm happy to donate my organs and I don't know why people have a problem with it. However if they do they have a lifetime to fill in an online form and add their NHS number and then they won't be used automatically, it'll be up to their next of kin.

[–]GnomeChompy 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

But it goes back to the hypocricy of bodily autonomy. "If she didn't say no, she means yes" hasn't been a valid model of consent for decades. Why should it be okay for organ harvesting?

Personally, I'm terrified doctors would kill a person deemed "bad for society" just to harvest their insides with a model like that. Too easy to say "whoops it was an accident" and have nonody question it.

[–]oafsalot 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It does, but the law was passed having major review, people and interest groups had the chance to speak on it and all avenues were explored. Though I doubt they explored the murder for organs avenue.

All I'm going to say on that is this isn't Israel.

[–]Mode1961 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

d immediately afterward, and lay claim to the estate on behalf of the child.

Is so , Why is there a charge in a lot of areas for 'doing nasty things to a dead body"

[–]throwaway202108214 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Here's some bad possibilities from this:

​

people can argue that even if men are dead (this is being done, as stated in the article, because of a large percentage of men that are dying in war in Israel) that fertility rates can be kept up.

Anyone that couldn't care less whether men are dead or alive have more ammo to claim men aren't even needed alive to keep up birth rates. People can justify drawing sperm from dead soldiers to keep birth rates up and birthing more soldiers. No birth strike or starving a war machine as effectively carried out as in the past.

​

...but wait, to avoid this, men can always get a vasectomy before their death or before entering the military.

However, in places like the US, factor in the overturn of Roe v Wade and the removal of medical privacy that can extend to matters like getting a vasectomy

https://www.webmd.com/women/news/20220520/roe-v-wade-privacy-concerns

Then factor in how vasectomies could easily be made illegal (and that this would be more easily done if vasectomies could be tracked).

Definitely a lot of ethical and legal implications here.

And not very encouraging for some considering that there are already some precedents where in some places, the government has made attempts to claim at least some part of your body after your death.

A nightmare scenario for antinatalists and those particularly terrified of forced birth.

[–]ld2gj 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is scary from a military POV. They can take our sperm, have our child, and then attempt to go after our SGLI, taking whoever we have it set to receive it.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Imagine how fucking terrible this is as a child. To hear that your biological creator. Your tether to this world. Your father. Was dead before you were conceived. “Mommy, how was I born” (obviously you wouldn’t go full blown science but) “well, that’s a long story, that I don’t know if you’ll ever be able to handle”

[–]oralabora 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is really fucking stupid

[–]CarryNecessary2481 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Now the question is does bodily autonomy still apply if ya dead? Because after your dead people kinda decide to do anything to it regardless of beforehand consent

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]bluefootedpig 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

to be clear though, that is only in the US, this article is about Israel.

In the 90s, they admitted to harvesting organs, including those from palestinians, without asking any family member. They have gotten in trouble recently in 2017 for doing the same.

It seems until 2008, there was basically no laws against harvesting organs, now there are some. I can't seem to find anything like the USA that gives you a right after death to say no, it seems from my basic reading, after you die the government can harvest without consent.

[–]LadyKnight151 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That's pretty surprising to hear. I thought that Jewish burial practices require the body to be buried intact, so practices such as cremation and embalming are forbidden. I would think removing organs, especially without permission, would be forbidden as well

[–]TomsRedditAccount1 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, that's exactly the problem; the body must be buried intact, but some people need organ replacements. That creates a significant supply-and-demand discrepancy, which, as is so often the case, incentivises dodgy stuff

[–]bluefootedpig 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

as the other person said, yes they need to but because of that, there is a massive shortage of organs to save lives. They even recently put in something like, "no give, no get", basically donors get priority, or if a family member (like parent) donated then you get higher priority.

But again, because there are so few, that is why they got caught more than once violating rights.

[–]HairDone 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Slippery slope to legalizing necrophilia. "Your honor, the corpse's penis was stiff, he clearly wanted it!"

[–]CarryNecessary2481 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Actually after reading the rest of the article the bill does require asking soldiers if they want their sperm extract for reproduction. So bodily autonomy is respected in this case

[–]CarryNecessary2481 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s not necrophilia tho. It’s not much different than getting organs after death.

[–]GnomeChompy 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

To any feminists who might be reading these comments. Stories like this, or more specifically, feminisms implicit support of stories like this are why I no longer stand up for abortion rights.

However, I am pro choice. All I want is for this street to go both ways.

[–]No-Satisfaction-2320 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Same here. Feminists had 50 years since roe v Wade existed to fight for men's reproductive rights and bodily autonomy, and they didn't. So unless they start now, I'm not helping.

[+]pumpkinpeopleunite -15 points-14 points-13 points 4 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

feminisms implicit support of stories like this are why I no longer stand up for abortion rights.

There's literally nothing in the article about feminists, I believe you are just assuming that feminists implicitly support it. If I'm wrong fair enough, just please provide some evidence of feminists supporting this or something like it. The article does mention however, that the legislation was sponsored by a member of a right-leaning party, so definitely not a feminist. Also, I don't understand how you have decided to not stand up for abortion rights because some people in Israel are doing something you don't approve of.

[–]GnomeChompy 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

gets broom

Scoot! Go away BPD.

[–]pumpkinpeopleunite -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Not quite sure what that's supposed to mean. Can you explain? Or better yet, answer my question.

[–]GnomeChompy 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

No because youre a BPD troll.

[–]pumpkinpeopleunite 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Ah, so you made something up that you now can't prove, so you're resorting to putting me down to try and get away with it. Very mature.

[–]Top-Gur-6037 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Have you taken your meds today?

[–]pumpkinpeopleunite 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Great comeback, you must be the witty one in your friend group (if you have any friends that is).

[–]Top-Gur-6037 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Oh no are you literally shaking right now?

[–]pumpkinpeopleunite 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, why would I be?

[–]DiversityIsDivisive 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I think BPD means BiPolar Disorder?

[–]pumpkinpeopleunite -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That was my guess too, it just made no sense in the context- I don't have bipolar disorder. The person I replied to made a silly comment that he assumed/knew would get him upvotes as it aligns with the narrative of many people on this sub, when I challenged him to back it up he resorted to childish insults. I would hope he would be downvoted for those antics..

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Your -100 comment karma screams numbers about you

[–]DiversityIsDivisive 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, don't feel bad if you got down voted for it. I got it for saying women can't turn into men.

Somehow we're supposed to be scientifically and technologically competitive. But millions of Americans think you're akin to a Klan Dragon if you understand that mammals come in two genders and humans are mammals.

The idea that making society less religious would in turn make it more scientific, logical, and educated has been thoroughly disproven

[–]GnomeChompy 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It was actually borderline personality disorder, which are basically sociopaths who like to play victim.

[+]DiversityIsDivisive -11 points-10 points-9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Are you doing any better? Dead guys should have rights about their bodies but not living children in the womb? That's some hardcore bigotry right there

Pre-born rights are human rights

[–]suib26 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Deranged. Her first thought after her son died was to steal his sperm for her own selfish desires to have grandchildren.

[–]Nacht_Waya 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So.... Necrophilia?

[–]TAPriceCTR 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

My wife had told me that if she is carrying a baby and she dies in a way that her body keeps functioning, maintain her corpse as long as possible for the health of the baby. We're not gonna write this down anywhere so the doctors would have to take my word for it. I'd say sperm extraction is far less invasive that keeping her entire body functioning artificially as an incubator. It's not like she can steal a quarter of his wages for the next 20 years by having his kid.

I'm generally fine with this. Spouses should, unless there's some reason to believe otherwise (like suspected of murder) , have every form of power of attorney over eachother. Don't hold this innocent couple to feminist standards.

The question in this story is, by whose request and authority was this procedure done? I oppose assuming he'd object as much as I oppose assuming he'd approve. Someone who knew him must represent him after death, let their judgement stand.

[–]AdAcademic4290 -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Well...they have been known to keep pregnant dead women on life support until the fetus is full term...

[–]ExpertRacer 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah but they don’t impregnated already dead women,

[–]AdAcademic4290 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The women may not have known themselves they were pregnant at the time. No account is taken of their already stayed views on pregnancy, having children.

And there is this

https://edition.cnn.com/2019/01/11/opinions/woman-raped-in-vegetative-state-giving-birth-violation-filipovic/index.html

[–]PracticalPlastic4123 -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They've been doing this for a while (2011), I don't really care for the ethics of it as long as they keep allowing the extraction of a woman's eggs after death.

[–]nambivpn -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Castration before cremation.

[–]Spinning4plates 4 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Lol that's amazing I have 0 idea why any of you have an issue with this.

[–]ExpertRacer 20 points21 points22 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s illegal, twice, grave robbing and Necrophilia

[–]makosh22 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh my... Is it ads for cremation? Bc that's what i would think about after such statements.

[–]thewokebogan 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is proof that grief can make people do some off the wall stuff.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter