Why dont the discourse on the "orgasm gap" that paints women as perpetual losers in casual sex/monogamous sex ever take account of the orgasm intensity gap that hugely favours women? As someone with male friends who are bisexual and gay and are at the receiving end of penetrative sex with men, theyve admitted countless times that properly stimulating the prostate and anal region is almost akin to female orgasm, with similar feelings of warmth, intensity, breadth of emotions and bliss.And when done right, it can last so much longer. My buddy says its almost like a 20 minute roller coaster ride. He thinks its atleast 10 times better than PIV/PIA. Most of them have told me being that being top is boring. Almost like scratching an itch compared to the full course meal that is the male prostate orgasm. And the guy doing the penetrating is doing most of the work whilst you get to ride the sexual roller coaster. But it is harder to achieve, like the female orgasm. Some have even said that the female orgasm is far more intense than a bottom who is "fully wired" experiencing a prostate orgasm since the clitoris and the vagina has far more sexual nerves. Most straight men will never experience such a feeling.

If a typical PIV male orgasm is like scratching an itch, and a female orgasm is a full course meal at a Michelin star restaurant , why do we continue to equate the two when we talk about the orgasm gap?