TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/seduction
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

      • Artful Prudence
      • A Voice for Men
      • Alpha Game
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Good Looking Loser
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • In Mala Fide
      • KillToParty
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Married Man Sex Life
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Power Moves
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • The Spearhead
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Stop making posts "challenging" men to get married. It's a terrible deal/risk for men in the west.

aptway

March 13, 2015
459 upvotes
/r/TheRedPill
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Stop making posts "challenging" men to get married. It's a terrible deal/risk for men in the west.
Author

aptway

Upvotes 459
Comments 302
Date March 13, 2015 9:31 PM UTC
(11 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/2yyd7g/stop_making_posts_challenging_men_to_get_married/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/stop-making-posts-challenging-men-to-get-married.30189
https://theredarchive.com/post/30189
Red Pill terms in post
the red pill
Top posts by aptway

Vanity Fair's "Tinder and The Dawn of the Dating Apocalypse" is chock-full of RP truths

529 upvotes
August 7, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

Yahoo: a shining example of female leadership running a company into the ground.

459 upvotes
April 20, 2016
/r/TheRedPill

If a woman lives in or has lived in Party World, she's already an Alpha Widow.

388 upvotes
March 15, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

An alpha widow laments her inability to enjoy sex anymore.

362 upvotes
October 15, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

Guy rejects woman because of her weight in the nicest way possible, gets socially eviscerated by hamsters and white knights.

289 upvotes
July 8, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

Women admit they love being dominated in bed, hamster that it's only because they're so empowered.

234 upvotes
April 23, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

"I'm not having sex with you tonight."

144 upvotes
November 24, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

Study: Couples reported a a greater decline in relationship quality over the first four years of their marriage when the wife was a narcissist (interestingly the same result was not found when the husband was a narcissist).

131 upvotes
January 30, 2016
/r/TheRedPill

Comments

[–]PumpDumpPumpDump 93 points94 points95 points 11 years ago* (23 children) | Copy Link

It actually seems like it's a pretty small set of people who are making most of the posts, but in high volumes.

Most men who've been married will admit, at a minimum, that it's got lots of downsides and risks. The best case version of it I can get out of close friends is "it's got lots of problems, and I envy you for being single, but it's great for kids." More common responses are along the lines of "I hate my wife" or "don't ever, ever, ever get married."

Part of the Red Pill is being able to see through your own bullshit. If you can't do that, you're just posturing. It happens on both sides of the debate. If you say marriages never ever work and they're always going to be hell, you're wrong, because it is possible to have a happy one. But mostly they don't work, and often they're hell, and they're a big gamble, because you're entering into a contract that was designed to benefit women, not men. Marriage is designed to promote the female default sexual strategy (one guy to one woman who gives her stuff in exchange for having babies, and possibly raising the babies of a better man she already slept with).

Telling men they should get married is like telling women they should join a harem. Maybe it could work out, and some women would probably like it. But a harem isn't designed with a woman's interests in mind.

If you are running around calling yourself "The Captain" or "The Patriarch" and telling people their entire purpose in life is to spit out babies, you might need to go read the sidebar some more.

[–]TankorSmash 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I wonder how many of the people that said 'dont ever ever marry' got married before they were 25.

[–]Kalepsis 17 points18 points19 points 11 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

I got married at 27. Waited until I thought I was mature enough, financially stable enough, generally ready for a huge commitment. I had a $12,000 car loan but no other debt, $10k in savings, a 2-bedroom apartment, and I was happy.

My wife and I were married a year and a half.

I am now 32. I live paycheck-to-paycheck working 50 hours a week at a job where I make $26.35 an hour. I have a house that is worth $30,000 less than I owe so I can't sell it, I have $41,450 in credit card debt alone. Can't afford a car over $5k. I will be paying off the "marital debts" for the next ten years at least. And I'm not even paying her alimony; these are just the results of commingling our funds, supporting her and her kid from a previous relationship, and allowing her equal access to my credit. Imagine how much fucking worse it could have been if I had to pay her child support and alimony.

I am grateful for two things that came out of my experience:

  1. I know now that marriage is the dumbest fucking thing a man can ever do. It's playing Russian Roulette, but you're using a semi-automatic pistol.

  2. Because she wanted to trap me by having a kid with me, I got a virility test and found out I'm sterile. This was honestly the best news I've ever heard in my life.

To summarize, I will advise every man I know to never, ever, ever get married.

[–]averageredpill 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I would like to know more about your story. How one can get 40k in credit card debt with only 1 and a half years of marriage ? What happened ?

[–]Kalepsis 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Basically I was stupid enough to give her duplicate cards with her name on them. I had 2 platinum credit cards with $20k available. She used them for everything, maxxed out both of them while I was deployed to Iraq. Turns out she was buying gas, food, and entertainment for herself, her daughter, and the dude she was fucking while I was gone. There are other things (like buying electronics from Best Buy on my credit), but that was my major mistake.

[–]averageredpill 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

There's divorce raped, and then there's marriage raped. All while you were deployed. That person is an horrible excuse for a human being.

Hope you get back into your feet soon!

[–]Kalepsis 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thank you, brother. It's a process. Luckily my current LTR is better. We're both childfree, uninterested in marriage, she has her own money, and we're polyamorous, so I can spin plates when I want to. There are good women out there, but I still wouldn't marry again.

[–]ModMachiavellianRed 42 points43 points44 points 11 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

It actually seems like it's a pretty small set of people who are making most of the posts, but in high volumes.

Name some names, we've got no time for this kind of bullshit clogging up the sub.

[–]Senior Contributorcocaine_face 40 points41 points42 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

There have been a lot. One of them even had a guy saying he wanted to get married, contract and all, for the "challenge".

Absolute and utter hamstering at its finest.

[–]ModMachiavellianRed 42 points43 points44 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Absolute and utter hamstering at its finest.

If I see the post, he's banned.

[–]Bulldog4436 points37 points38 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Thank God, I've been waiting to see this happen, it is really getting frustrating. What is the point of all of us that know better giving factual advice, if these morons continue to think the same dumb shit every other foolish motherfucker that got married thought, that their situation is the one special situation and their woman is the one special woman? Fucking idiots. Don't get married. There is not one single benefit that outweighs the mountain of shit.

[–]ModMachiavellianRed 25 points26 points27 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you see any more of this blue pill idiocy, let me know, I will personally investigate the user in question.

[–]GainzdalfTheWhey -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yo that's what's report is for amr?

[–]3 Endorsed ContributorTorquatus 20 points21 points22 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

https://archive.today/f0s8k

There's one. I'm too tired to track down some of the others I've seen lately; only knew that one because I chose to write a counterpoint in it.

[–]ModMachiavellianRed 34 points35 points36 points 11 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

He's not adding value to the community, so he's out:

http://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/2yyd7g/stop_making_posts_challenging_men_to_get_married/cpe9qoh

[–]Clutchology18 points 11 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

You're freaking heroic. I fucking love this sub more than any other (more now). Fucking self awareness right here. Fuck political correctness, this isn't a woman's safe space. Revitalizing.

[–]MEpicLevelCheater 28 points29 points30 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's no coincidence that The Red Pill - a large, populous, almost-unwieldy and yet still useful, informative, and smooth-running subreddit - is operated by a meritocratic patriarchy.

We are the microcosm of a social strategy that works.

[–]throwaway-aa2 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

holy shit WHAT A FUCKING BODY BAG!

I can honestly say, this is one of the most powerful interactions in recent history to me. Dude at the end... goosebumps...

I've lived my entire life subjected to assholes like this. Passive aggressive this, irrational argument that. You banned him, and you explained EXACTLY why in a way that just cannot be defeated rationally. Society never gave a FUCK about me. Women took advantage of me and never gave a FUCK about me. Thank you man. Your comment gives me a lot of hope.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Most men who've been married will admit, at a minimum, that it's got lots of downsides and risks.

Understatement of the week.

[–]vainamoinens-scythe 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I love my wife and my kids. But don't get married.

My guess is only about 2 percent of the US population is even capable of having a long term relationship of any kind that trends to a positive over the course of time.

Other cultures, or even economic classes may be different.

[–]Frensel 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

economic classes

This is HUGE. Divorce rates are way lower for the rich than for the poor. And while you lose more money in absolute terms, it's way, way different when divorce costs you your yacht or summer home as opposed to your rent money.

[–]1 Endorsed Contributormordanus 64 points65 points66 points 11 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Marriage is life on hard mode. Having an arm ripped off by a tractor and trying to learn the piano is music on hard mode. Rubbing chicken guts all over yourself and swimming through piranha infested waters is swimming on hard mode. None of these should be a desirable thing to someone.

When you get married you taking a spin on the roulette table. Maybe your wife will be faithful. Maybe your wife won't punch you in the face whenever she feels like it and call the cops when you resist. Maybe you won't get divorce raped and have everything you love taken away from you. Maybe you will be able to pay the alimony or child support and not be arrested. Too many people take this gamble and get destroyed by the consequences of marriage. Don't do it.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 27 points28 points29 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

That's the shitty part. It used to be life-improved. The woman had a man willing to sacrifice himself for her stability. The man had perpetual access to female intimacy. It was a very simple social contract. But not any more...

[–]Magnum256 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Agreed. The concept of old - fashioned marriage sounds fine, as in the first half of the 20th century. Marriage today sounds like shit. I'm in my 30s, never been married, no plans to do so, however most of my friends are married, and most are miserable. Some pretend they're happy but I can't imagine they're being honest with the amount of tiptoeing around they have to do even regarding mundane things like socializing or enjoying hobbies. I have one friend whose wife banned him from using the internet; I'll be talking to him over Skype and suddenly it will be "oh shit I hear the wife coming!" followed by an instant logoff. I couldn't live as an adult man with those kinda of absurd restrictions imposed by my spouse, and that's one of the most minor examples I can give.

[–]GainzdalfTheWhey 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Isn't Internet like a human right in some country? Sue her for violation lol

[–]Senior Contributorcocaine_face 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

His wife banned him from the internet?

How does he not see this as a problem?

[–]1 Endorsed Contributormordanus 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

situations like that are perfect examples of why so many women refer to their man as a child. She is basically the guys mother and gets to dish out orders and punishments.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Marriage is life on hard mode.

"Yeah, it takes more sacrifice than you think you can give and you have to work on it for years and years, but it's totally worth it." Except they never actually specify what makes it worth it. Love, companionship, and bonding with another human being aren't exclusive to marriage.

[–]1 Endorsed Contributormordanus 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You know how people will say something to you that you know they have said over a hundred times that day and you respond with something you have likewise said countless times? "Have a good day" "You too" or other similarly commonly quoted things are programmed into our brains so that we don't have to actually think how we are doing today or whatever.

Saying that marriage is totally worth it is just a knee jerk response to when we talk about it. We say it because we believe that it is what we are supposed to say in that situation. When you really get people talking about it and get them to explore what their options might be or how shitty the situation is you find that very few people really think it is totally worth it

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil 121 points122 points123 points 11 years ago (33 children) | Copy Link

If I make a post saying that men shouldn't use motorcycles as their daily transportation because of the statistically high risk, ill instantly get a lot of motorcycle butt mad. I love my motorcycle it's awesome it has X Y Z advantage. Im a great driver ill be fine.

But it doesnt matter. You can be an amazing motorcycle rider or a great husband you can still get fucked up. You are not in complete control of the situation. Regardless of how amazing you are your wife or another driver can still fuck you up. And there is nothing you can do about it.

[–]RosewoodPill 21 points22 points23 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

If the crash rate for motorcycles was near 50%, nobody would ride. Think about that.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Anyone got the numbers for average accidents/fatalities over a riders lifetime? I don't have a point, I'm just curious.

[–]Senior Contributorcocaine_face 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

IIRC it was something like 1/4000 got into an accident? I am totally pulling these numbers out of my ass though. Still, it's several orders of magnitude lower than marriages fucking up.

[–][deleted] 23 points24 points25 points 11 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

At least with motorcycling, The risks are more easily exposed, and mitigated with awareness.

[–][deleted] 11 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 32 points33 points34 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just like you should be able to stop having a wife if she stops sucking.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

While still retaining your accrued wealth and sanity.

[–]speed3_freak 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Are you the stig's American cousin, or his truck driving cousin?

[–]redpillromp 17 points18 points19 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Plus when your motorcycle breaks down every time you want a ride, or constantly requires expensive replacement parts you can trade it in for a new one without being tied into a 20 year court ordered maintenance program.

[–]deepfriedcocaine 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And you are actually the one in control of a motorcycle while marriage would give someone else a lot of power over you.

[–]RedPill808 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And no one's saying you're a sad pathetic excuse for a man if you don't ride!

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points 11 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

a motorcycle is not a 50-50 chance of dying aka losing everything.

[–]youreallsostupid -4 points-3 points-2 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Neither is marriage, check the US census.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Divorce rate in the US is 50%.

[–]youreallsostupid -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

It's not 50% even if you count the people who have divorced over 3 times. Please read a book.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

http://www.apa.org/topics/divorce/

However, about 40 to 50 percent of married couples in the United States divorce. The divorce rate for subsequent marriages is even higher.

[–]youreallsostupid -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

http://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/p70-125.pdf

 

"While overall, 21 percent of men and 22 percent of women had ever been divorced, the percentage ever divorced was highest for adults aged 50 to 69 (about 36 percent). These proportions fall sharply by age 70 because widowhood becomes more prevalent among aging spouses."

 

Or if you just google the 50% stat, you'll see 100s of contradicting articles.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

21 percent of men and 22 percent of women had ever been divorced


40 to 50 percent of married couples in the United States divorce

There's a pretty big difference in what these two mean. If you're dating a female who has gone through divorce, this is a statistic to consider. There are people on here who are in their thirties.

[–]youreallsostupid 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I understand that, but the assertion here in this sub is that you have a 50/50 shot with every girl and that simply is not the case. I agree with almost everything else on this sub. This stat bothers the shit out of me, because idiots are marrying women who have been divorced 5 times and it's killing the marriage stat. You really should just apply this 50% logic to divorced women. The 50% statistic is not a legit statistic to consider, if 1/5 women have ever been divorced then the chances are pretty good that if you find a woman who has never been married you're likely to stay married. Also rich people hardly ever get divorced. So it does seem like status does play a key role in this. I just think there's a logical way to go about marriage, I also think that if you're always bettering yourself (like following the advice in this sub) then your marriage chances are even better.

[–]Teeklin 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Seems like a pretty good reason to run away screaming from motorcycles AND marriage and spend your days home, alone, safe from all the scary uncertainty of life.

Best not to trust or take risks in life at all. Way easier to not get hurt when you just hide from things.

[–]RealRational 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

True of motorcycles, and sky diving, and rock climbing, not true of marriage.

edit: to be clear, Teeklin was being sarcastic. I was responding to the sarcasm, I have a motorcycle, and rock climb without ropes every year, I intend to get my skydiving license next year. I do not EVER intend to marry.

[–]blaze8902 15 points16 points17 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I ride a motorcycle, rock climb whenever I have the time, and plan on getting my skydiving licence asap. I consider them all less of a high risk activity than marriage.

My father was a paratrooper, and has thousands of jumps under his belt,and is fine.

He's had two marriages, and pays 3k a month of what he earned from 30 years of service to a woman who hasn't worked for shit all her life.

Skydiving 0 negatives out of 2000+

Marriage 1 negative out of 2.

I like my odds skydiving much better.

[–]1 Endorsed Contributormordanus 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think you're right. We should all start juggling chainsaws and eating poison because it's risky and unsafe. I'm going to go play in traffic right now!

[–][deleted] 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's exactly what he was implying...

[–]SpawnQuixote 186 points187 points188 points 11 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

As a 50 year old guy who has fought the vaginal support system called family court, this guy has it nailed.

You are by default the bad guy and have to prove you're not. Things may be getting better in some ways but in many ways, they are getting worse.

USA is getting downright creepy with its pushing of social justice as a form of change when it's actually more stalinist communism bullshit in another wrapper.

[–]TitsAndWhiskey 45 points46 points47 points 11 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Another older divorced guy here confirming that every bit of this is absolute gospel. Don't do it, kids. And consider getting a vasectomy.

[–]SunshineBlotters 14 points15 points16 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Hopefully male birth control is released in 2017 as they said they would

Though I doubt it cuz the one time shot will likely cut into the proceeds of the female's daily birth control.

[–]Echelon64 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

There are more uses for birth control besides just controlling birth and many women simply enjoy the benefits of not having a period to begin with. Female birth control isn't going to go anywhere.

[–]SunshineBlotters 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I know it aint going anywhere. But there will be a drop in sales to girls who use it just to avoid pregnancy. Especially those in committed relationships.

Dont think for a second that these pharmaceutical companies arent assembling a team of their best actuaries and financial analysts to run cost vs benefit analyses and projected financial statements to see if it will be worth it to them.

[–]Echelon64 -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Especially those in committed relationships.

Those in committed relationships have a better solution in the IUD.

[–]PlanB_pedofile 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Plus one is hormone while the other is a physical invasion. If men can turn off their sperm with hormones, we'd have had it ages ago.

[–]zulhadm -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Birth control does not make women's periods go away. It just reduces the length of each cycle.

[–]PlanB_pedofile 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Ehhhh don't know. Vasectomy or a shot to the dick. They seem the same.

[–]SunshineBlotters 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is supposedly easier to do, easier to reverse, and cost less than a vasectomy.

[–]Berend09 38 points39 points40 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

USA is getting downright creepy with its pushing of social justice as a form of change when it's actually more stalinist communism bullshit in another wrapper.

Perfect description. Couldn't have said it better.

[–][deleted] 26 points27 points28 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, social justice my ass. More like socialist injustice. Problem is you don't have to be married to pay for someone else's bastard child. The tax dollars you pay to Big Govt Beta Bux will take care of that for you.

[–][deleted] 19 points20 points21 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The shitty thing is that if you get roped into child support, you're still going to pay taxes to provide for all of those women you didn't actually knock up. I'm sure it stings much worse when you're doing it twice.

[–]ThePedanticCynic 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hell, at least one guy is in jail for not coughing up support for kids that aren't his, delivered to a woman he never dated. She just put his name on the birth certificate. The system is getting worse for men, not better.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In our court system men are guilty until proven innocent, and women are innocent until proven guilty. Especially when it comes to familial issues

[–]RedPill808 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

45 year old married guy here (2nd Marriage - yup, slooow learner)

DO NOT GET MARRIED

Love my wife, love my kids. Truth is that women don't love you back. First wife expertly hid her party girl/CC past until she squeezed out a couple kids, then decided booze, drugs 'n alphas were better than being a mom.

Divorce and family court are stacked against you & there to punish men. You can "win" small victories, but for what it costs financially, they are only pyrrhic.

Wife 2.0 is better, but I discovered TRP too late. I'd rather spin plates and have my money & freedom. Being married is much tougher, and not in a good way.

You want to "have kids"? There are hundreds of Big Brother opportunities to help kids/orphans who need a man in their life. Make those your kids. You'll feel good and help society too.

DO NOT GET MARRIED

[–]PlanB_pedofile 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In oriental cultures the biggest influence and honor is the sensie. The master teaching the student was nearly as high of honor as the biological father.

Probably because they knew anyone can donate sperm into a woman and pop out a human but a real man is able to mold that child's mind into a resemblance of his own legacy.

[–]chtrchtr_pussyeater 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

40 yr old guy, completely agree!

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points17 points 11 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

Prenups can get thrown away? I had no idea. What kind of shitty legal binding document is this?

I had no idea that your prenup can be arbitrarily discarded. What is the reason for this?

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points17 points 11 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Coercion is often cited. There are ways to protect yourself from getting a prenuptial thrown out based on coercion, but no foolproof ways.

[–]Berend09 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Can you please expand on this?

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points15 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

You have your lawyer, tell her to get her own lawyer, and then it is signed by all 4 at the same time, so two lawyers as witnesses to it.

(I'm not a lawyer)

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

This is the best you can do, the time line is also important. It's advisable to do it a significant enough time before the wedding and have it signed on multiple different dates.

Even then it's not waterproof.

[–]Berend09 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Good to know. It's sad that so many steps have to be taken to prevent grabbing the ankles of life.

[–]2Overkillengine 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Easier to just refuse to get married.

[–]Berend09 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Indeed. I love it when others try to use the "you don't want to die old and alone" argument. I can promise that the feeling of old and alone pales in comparison to the effects of divorce rape. When I'm old and wrinkly, the strip club will fix any loneliness issues.

[–]2Overkillengine 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'd rather be truly alone than alone with someone whom is only with me because of a contract.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The best you can do is just not get married

[–]other_worlds 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Too bad coercion can't be cited to throw out the marriage financial contract. Wait. Why can't it?

[–]grewapair 13 points14 points15 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

A lot of law firms won't even draft them, as there's no way to ensure it will stand up.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

lol no. It's billable hours.

[–]Echelon64 9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Prenups can get thrown away?

Yes, the idea is that the pre-nup may be heavily one sided, or that the female partner didn't have proper legal counsel, or someone could have shifted the judges bran flakes bowl by 90 degrees causing her wiccan candle system to go out of sync.

Prenups for your typical man are worth slightly less than the toilet paper you buy off of Amazon.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What the fuck, society.

Maybe I'm still in the anger phase, but I've felt this way for a long time before coming to TRP: The world loves to shit on men's rights.

[–]Rathadin 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You have no rights, STFU and go make more money to support the welfare system for single mothers by choice.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"wiccan candle system".... Goddamn that was funny! I'll have to remember that one. That's about how it works too.

[–]Senior Contributorcocaine_face 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I wouldn't go quite that far, but they're less useful than most people envision.

And in most places, they don't protect assets created after marriage.

[–]1grendalor 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

In most places in the United States, pre-nups are most useful to protect substantial pre-marital assets -- if you have assets you have acquired yourself prior to the marriage, you can try to protect them in a pre-nup if you (1) disclose them thoroughly to your fiancee, (2) have both of you represented by expert family lawyers, (3) actively negotiate the pre-nup terms (not just one draft and sign -- negotiate several revised versions), (4) have all of that take place well in advance of the marriage. Then you have a decent chance in many states of having it enforced with respect to pre-marital assets that are kept segregated during the marriage. Some courts won't enforce it against the gains on such assets that take place during the marriage, however.

And, with respect to basically anything else, it's very hard to enforce. That includes: assets acquired in marriage, debt acquired in marriage, behavior during marriage (i.e., trying to "penalize" cheating by means of punishing it in the pre-nup), anything pertaining to children (custody, visitation, support) or, in some states, alimony (alimony law has changed a lot and is still changing in many places).

So, if you're looking for a pre-nup, realize that it's mostly worthwhile to protect pre-marital assets. For other things, it's either much less likely to be enforced or downright very unlikely to be enforced, depending on where you live.

Disclaimer: I am a lawyer -- not a family law expert, but I know a bit about it. Any details or legal advice would have to be obtained, however, from a loawyer admitted to practice where you live, and who is a family law expert. Note also that the laws outside the United States may indeed be very different regarding pre-nups -- I am not familiar with them, and this comment does not relate to laws or practices of countries other than the United States.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It sounds like they make it very difficult to draft and ineffective to discourage men from drafting prenups. Why is this?

[–]1grendalor 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The underlying reason is that, in most places in the US, family courts are "courts of equity" rather than "courts of law". The difference between the two is that while a court of law enforces contracts as they are written (absent fraud or illegality), and will allow people to make a bad deal, courts of equity are concerned about the fairness of the result reached by enforcing the contract. So a court of equity doesn't want to enforce a "bad deal", in the sense of the court viewing the result as "inequitable" (i.e., unfair). On this basis, all kinds of "equitable rationales" will be used to deny enforcement, such as coercion/duress (too close to wedding date, so under pressure), latent fraud (incomplete disclosure of assets), unequal bargaining position (not represented by good lawyers, no opportunity to negotiate, no actual negotiation), and so on, as ways the court justifies not enforcing the pre-nup "for equitable reasons". A related set of reasons is "public policy" -- the idea that contractually divesting a spouse of her share of the marital assets, her claim on alimony or spousal support, her claim over the kids and child support and so on violates the public policy of the state, and therefore will be ignored by the court --> the idea here is that the state (including the courts of the state) have determined that state law/policy on marital assets/support/kids/cs/alimony is "X", and you therefore have no right/ability to deviate from "X" by means of making up your own "private law" in a contract.

The bottom line is that family courts aren't neutral in the sense that courts of law (in theory) are -- they aren't trying to be a referee to make sure everyone plays by the rules of the game, and let the chips fall where they may in terms of letting people suffer from making a bad deal in the contract. Family courts are courts of equity, so they are very interested in the result, and are not trying to be a neutral referee in terms of deciding whether to enforce -- it's all rolled into the "fair and equitable under the circumstances" idea, and if the court concludes that enforcement would be unfair or inequitable, it won't enforce.

So, yes, it's meant to be very difficult to "draft around family law", because they don't want people making up their own private law in areas the state and courts have already covered. It's not viewed like a commercial contract (although even there, there are things you can't waive in a commercial contract like, say, consumer protection laws), but as a matter of state policy, and the idea is not to enforce the pre-nup if it contravenes state policy or otherwise would lead to an unfair result. Generally if it relates to pre-marital assets, keeping these away from the spouse is not seen as unfair -- after all they were pre-marital. But anything else ... not viewed that way, generally.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's not as bad as guys here say. An example of one thrown out is James Cameron's. He made her sign a prenup on a bar napkin when they were drunk the night before the wedding. It was not upheld. Do it months in advance, make sure she has legal counsel, don't lie (say she gets 5% of your net worth of $100k, when you actually have $50M), don't ask for anything unreasonable (she gets nothing if she weighs over 200lbs), and review and resign every few years. Marriage is still a raw deal, but the prenup is not what RP makes it out to be.

[–]Aquasven48 points 11 years ago* [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link

Getting married is like sewing one of your own legs off.
''Yeah,I definitely have a harder life then you guys now.''
Uh oh.

''But you know what, I managed to find happiness despite losing a leg, I'm living my life just fine.''

''So be a man and sew your leg off as well you pussy.''

No one argues that happiness is impossible in marriage.It's possible but the whole premise is filled with stupidity.
Why would you purposely handicap yourself for the rest of your life?
Why would any man with a sane mental mind limit his own ability to walk away from a woman by willfully signing up for a financial guillotine hanging over his head at all times?
Just so you can be more manly?Fuck off please.

That's the same pile of shit feminists spew:
''Men are supposed to be manly and be able to deal with our shit, if they don't then they're not real men.''
That's the same bs rhethoric coming from some TRP brothers who in my opinion have no place here.

''screw yourself over and be happy in marriage, because you can take it, because you're a man''

It's already too late..men who spread shit like this are already downgraded to beta's.
Once you give up your rationality by giving up your most amazing ability..that is to recognize that you fucked up and to learn from those mistakes..once you give that up the male hamster starts running.

And who can blame these poor men?Realizing you've literally given away half of your financial power (money made by your HARD work,time and life energy) to a woman for the rest of your life for NO reason at all but the mindfuckery propagated by feminism.
Who can blame these men for running away mentally and letting the hamster spin?
But a real man never runs away, you admit your mistake and you soak it the fuck up.

The only men that survive a marriage with their full male potential intact are the ones that recognize they fucked up big time by marrying and act up to minimize the damage in the ways they can.
Real men own up to their shit, so they should normally still get respect from their wives.

But looking at the divorce-rape statistics..I'm sure plenty of alpha's have been assfucked just as badly by their spouse.
(I mean come on, you can walk away...but she can walk away and take half of your money AND 8 out of 10 the kids with it..Who the fuck are we kidding?It doesn't take much for even a woman no matter how stupid she is to understand that SHE has the POWER over YOU, her man.
And maybe some unicorns can deal with that power but we all know how it's going down when a woman is behind the wheel..)
And not only that, the very men who get raped in divorce have thrown a gigantic wedding party mostly out of their own pocket to celebrate the moment they unconsciously weaponized their ''Bride''.
Is there any limit to the humiliation society has put the male gender through lately?
Is this shit going to go even further and dirtier?Who knows...

Keeping your spouse cool and under control, as if one is constantly managing a nuclear reactor.
Even if you do manage to keep things safe and under control through TRP marriage tactics you will be under constant stress.
Perpetually worrying about the state-of-mind of your woman, you may appear like an alpha, you may have her under your control and at your whim, but the truth is you're not keeping her happy and sane because you want to, but because you have to.All your actions are constantly governed by the overarching threat of the power she wields over you.Whether she's ready to use it or not,whether she's even aware of it or not.
''Fuck it, I'll divorce her!''
And each single check, or promotion, will be slashed for the sake of your ex-wife, and each single time your alpha dignity will itch horribly and remind you.. there's someone out there with control over YOUR life.
Got lucky enough that your income is now eclipsing the alimony?Brace yourself for the ex-wife spurting herself to claim her lion-share in front of the courts, once again.
The only way to forget is to bleed and sacrifice enough ego and dignity till you hit beta levels of sanity and let the hamster reassure you that ''she deserves this,marriage is the right thing, she was the first love of my life, I do it for the kids, society expects me to do this I'm just being a real man.''
Whatever happens, once you enter the marriage contract you are BRANDED for LIFE.
No man should make his soul go through such an abonimation of a contract.
I once used to wonder what the deal was with the stories of aged men sitting in bars ruminating,regretting and venting about their ex-wife this and their current wife that...with a chunk of their soul dead and stuck in the past.
I now understand.

A man can in theory overcome everything.But a man is also just a simple human.We desire happiness.Don't go through hell if you don't have to.

One thing is sure, you especially don't try to lure younger brothers into the vile trap you once fell into, that's some woman level of nastiness.

[–]CptDefB 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't recall seeing your name before, but I will remember it now. Nice narrative, excellent analogies. +1

[–]sigmayogi4 points 11 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

That reminds me of Kobe, I wonder how happy he is married to that cow, and having to hide his natural instinct to lay pipe with all the available women. Denied being an alpha savage he was born to be.

[–]kevkos 11 points12 points13 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You really think Kobe is "faithful"?

[–]Endorsed ContributoriBrokeRSA 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm just being a real man.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7ZHLppS5_w

I love how many people miss the point of this scene.

[–]leredditarmy5000 18 points19 points20 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I spoke to a family lawyer recently out of concern for this sort of thing. As far as property rights, having a child is virtually the same has being married.

In order to maintain your independence and property, you need to be common law and have no children.

Even then, she will be entitled to whatever she put in.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

how is...how is that "fair" in any sense of the word? Oh having a baby means you're just Jesus Christ. You get all of HIS money he ever made or will think about making.

[–]fhghg 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

That's why my children will be Cambodian.

http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/css/resource/foreign-reciprocating-countries

http://www.americanlaw.com/citabrd.html

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nguyen_v._INS

[–]DistantWinter 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm not sure if you are speaking of US law and if so what state, but I can say without a doubt that where I live in the US this is not true.

I was with a woman for 15 years and had 3 children. I never married her and only had our mortgage in both of our names. I never shared any type of financial accounts. Her money was hers and my money was mine. I purchased Tesla stock and she purchased candy bars.

The only thing she got from our 15 year cohabitation was half of the equity in the home and child support based on 50% of the differences in our income. I wrote her a check for her half of the equity and child support takes the money from my employer.

I kept the house, my cars, my retirement accounts, investments, all of the furniture in the home except what I wanted to give her and I see my children 50% of the time.

She took all her student, medical and credit card debt (over 30K). She took her vehicle, clothes, candy wrappers, some furniture and I personally delivered 4 truck loads of junk and trinkets to her dilapidated rented house. Other than my home and car I have no debt.

I also struck first... I obtained a mens rights lawyer two days after she flaked out and had two contracts written up immediately. The first one was for the sale of the home. I had it written in detail to what she was entitled to. The second only benefited me for my rights to my children. The financials were never going to change. I paid off the second mortgage and refinanced my home into my name only.

I had lived through, heard and seen enough horror stories of divorce growing up to know I was NEVER, EVER getting married. Listened to others who've had their kids taken, raped in court, blamed of multiple types of abuse, lost all hope and committed suicide. I treated our relationship as a marriage and I prepared for D Day. She didn't.

One of the best decisions I ever made.

[–]moonmania 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

As far as property rights, having a child is virtually the same has being married.

What?! Are there no options? Could you have the mother give up parental status?

[–]alritealritealrite 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Every morning at break each of my coworkers take turns bitching about their spouses. One even has to call his wife during breaks and "check in." It's not uncommon for someone's wife to call and bitch one of them out either. Meanwhile I'll sit there and take turns heckling them for being married. I'm going to start keeping track of how many times I hear "happy wife happy life."

[–]javi404 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

happy wife happy life

I heard that at a good friends wedding and I almost dropped my drink. The maid of honor was the one that said it during a speech. Poor sucker.

[–]alritealritealrite 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Wow, speak of the devil. On our front page with over 3k upvote. http://news.rutgers.edu/research-news/wife%E2%80%99s-happiness-more-crucial-her-husband%E2%80%99s-keeping-marriage-track-rutgers-study-finds/20140911

[–]javi404 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Out of Rutgers. No surprise there. Disgusting.

[–]Endorsed ContributoriBrokeRSA 19 points20 points21 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Agreed, those clowns who actually advocate marriage are still blue as blue. Marriage is such a huge commitment for men that these men are victims of the sunk-cost fallacy -- they can't or won't let go of their oneitis without blowing up the rest of their life, so they rationalize that it's possible to have hand as a man in a marriage. I mean, sure, it is possible, but it's a lot of work for what benefits exactly? If you have little to no interest in children, marriage offers you absolutely NOTHING you can't get elsewhere.

TheRedPill is about getting the most out of life as a man. If you're alpha enough to have a redpill marriage, you're alpha enough to do whatever you want outside of that legal structure -- why handicap yourself with a wife who is financially incentivized to turn on you?

[–]Statecensor 20 points21 points22 points 11 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Living with a woman and not getting married but having children with her is actually worse then being married. Not only do you lose out on the small legal benefits and protections from being married but you face the exact same risk regarding child support. Sure you can skip not paying her alimony or half of your fortune but depending on how wealthy you are to begin with the child support payments alone could be enough to crush your spirit if you are making less then 80k and you live on the west or east coast. For men with working class jobs like tradesmen, salarymen and high paying but still blue collar jobs with no family wealth getting married is not worse then having a baby momma. I am not saying you should marry your kid's mother just pointing out some of the alternatives could be just as bad if not worse.

So you should include never having children with your post Aptway along with not getting married.

[–]panterin 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A sane man wouldn't have children in a child-support state.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, all true.

But... if you are specifically interesting in kids, this is definitely better than getting married. That's if you can't pawn your genes off on a beta bucks..

[–][deleted] 25 points26 points27 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Misery loves company. It's all just married dudes who want more people going through that shit with them so they feel like their decision isn't as bad.

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points16 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

People are the same way about parenthood. They'll complain all the time about how they are stressed out, get no sleep, have no money, sexlife went to shit. Then turn around and tell you to have some of your own.

[–]Kubomi 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Having children is a pain but it is also an easy method of instilling meaning into your life. I don't have kids and never plan to but I can see how people could complain about it and also value it highly simultaneously; it is in our DNA after all.

[–]veganhitler 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Man. Thats so true.

The other day i had a guy tell me to get married, because it's not fair and i should be miserable like the rest of the married guys.

it sounded like he was joking, but thinking back on it, i think he meant it.

[–]NoRegretj 16 points17 points18 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Subtle shills, I swear. Coaxing people out of this is deadly as fuck because they'll publicly denounce us even more. Don't get married.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

agreed - the state is alpha male. unless youre a billionaire she's marrying a beta. stings a bit

[–]PM_Me_For_Drugs 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

the state is alpha male

Too true - Western civilization does the "iron fist in velvet glove" thing very well. They figured out back in 1970 that you can't just call in the national guard and murder kids who challenge your ideology, so by necessity, their methods of subduing potential rabble rousers have become much more subtle.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

they realized you eliminate the problem through twelve years of indoctrination... schooling

[–]PM_Me_For_Drugs 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yup, just frame every subject and conversation so that lies/distortions are facts and dissent is out of bounds. Shockingly effective!

I hated the indoctrinating nature of public school. Brought my own books to class... Actually got suspended one time for questioning a teacher (who was wrong). Didn't swear or raise my voice, still got suspended for "insubordination" because I made her look dumb in front of the class.

I just laughed when she handed me the slip and said "Seriously? What is this, the military?"

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Another 50 year old here...

OP is spot on... Don't get married. However, as others have mentioned you don't even need to get married to get squeezed.

For some perspective... my federal taxes + child support is in excess of $50,000/year. Think about that for a moment...

[–]winter-sleep1 points 11 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Given your perspective I'd like to ask you a question. Are there any good ways to avoid child support in the USA? I've been looking and can't find any. Would rather support my future kids directly without the state and mother as intermediary parties.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Adopt Surrogacy

Otherwise you roll the dice with your kids based on what some woman decides... don't do it.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Many RP guys talk about the negatives of getting married, and they went and got married. ex. Bill Burr. I've yet to hear him or any others talk about the positives, I know women know some positives about getting married. Why do men talk shit about marriage but yet they still do it?

[–]symko 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'll bite. Some people have a godhole and they have to fill it with stuff, it could be sex, drugs, money, women, stuff.....etc. Marriage is one of those holes and some people are just content to try to make it work when the System dictates that it wont. Probably because they believe that they can beat the odds. Tell you what, sell all your stuff, get a ticket to Vegas, with the rest of the leftover money go to the ritziest casino you can find and bet everything on one roulette wheel. I'll happily do that than to consider getting married.

[–]PM_Me_For_Drugs 9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

godhole

This might be the most apt euphemism I've ever heard for the great existential discomfort of being human.

[–][deleted] 18 points19 points20 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Stop making posts "challenging" men to get married.

I agree with your reasoning, but disagree with your post.

Once you've hit your mid-to-late 20s, people will start trying to convince you to get married. Some will be overt about it, some will call you immature, some will talk about how marriage makes your stronger or "better", you name it.

And guess what, some of them will be really damn convincing.


If you can't articulate to yourself why you shouldn't get married, while reading an intelligent post on TRP arguing otherwise, then you'll have a difficult time convincing yourself of that IRL as well...when the feminine imperative is doing it's damnedest convince you, you better be prepared.

Iron sharpens iron, as they say.

[–]3789143792849381 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Sometimes we don't have to be able to articulate it even if being able to do so would be nice. Marriage is unnatural, and the default state is to not get married. We just have to avoid the indoctrination and feminization as we age, and we can avoid it

[–]aphelion3342 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Stellar username sir. I tried to find a pattern and couldn't.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You couldn't see the pattern? It's all numbers! Damn betabux !

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Marriage is unnatural, and the default state is to not get married.

Problem is, the idea of marriage feels natural to most men, it's why so many of us do it...believe me, regardless of whether or not it is natural, the right femme fatale can make it feel very natural

If you go into through life assuming that marriage will be easy to avoid because it's "unnatural", you'll probably end up like Mark Minter of yesteryear...the dude who was manosphere-famous for ranting on and on about not getting married ends up rationalizing, hamstering, and doing exactly that.


And frankly, marriage (yesteryear's concept of it, at least) should feel natural.

Humans have been practicing marriage for thousands of years, across thousands of cultures...can you name the one cultural practice that ancient Romans, New Guinea cannibals, and the Amish all have in common? That's right, marriage.

Unnatural? We wouldn't be who we are as a species if we never invented marriage.

[–]panterin 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Marriage is still 100% culture 0% instinct. Remove the indoctrination and the person will have no desire of marrying.

[–]mrp3anut 9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hmm maybe we can just alternate between post of guys complaining about what another guy posts

If you don't want to get married then don't. Crying about someone else posting about marriage is group think bullshit.

[–]disposable_pants 10 points11 points12 points 11 years ago (37 children) | Copy Link

I think most of the posts that don't immediately write off marriage come from one of three places:

  1. Men who are married, are happy, and don't see that their situation is not typical,
  2. Men who are married, are unhappy, and are still rationalizing about it, or
  3. Men who want kids, see marriage as a likely part of that equation, and want to figure out how to lower the risk for themselves.

Number one is fine because it usually focuses on how to maintain a happy marriage, and plenty of people on this sub either are or at some point will be married -- it's fair to discuss strategies for maximizing their chance of success. Number two is misguided and that's almost always recognized and called out.

Number three has plenty of room for discussion but the threads are too often short circuited with "don't get married, period", "get a vasectomy, period", "marry someone else, period", etc. This is poor quality discussion as it ignores reality: Many people want kids (there is no rational argument against this) and marriage is often the best way to have them (imagine the quality of woman that will have your children out of wedlock and compare that to LTR material).

I'm fine with squashing "marriage is good", "marriage is a worthy challenge", "real men get married", etc. discussion because as OP points out it's settled opinion that marriage is a highly risky endeavor, but too often needlessly anti-marriage comments swamp a thread on topics one or three.

[–]Senior Contributorcocaine_face 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

On the contrary, a woman who won't have kids with you outside of a marriage (I mean the contract, not a party or title) is a lower quality woman than a woman who will.

Any woman who demands that you expose yourself to undue risk for no reason is low quality, and doesn't love you as much as you think she does.

Drop her. Find a new one who will. You can and should do better than a woman who demands a marriage contract.

This is scarcity mentality.

[–]disposable_pants 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

This is scarcity mentality.

I think it goes without saying that there are very few women who are A) available and B) the type of woman you'd want to have kids with. Every month or so someone writes up some back-of-the-envelope math and concludes that ~5% of women are what we'd consider marriageable. Now how many of those live within a reasonable distance of you? How many could you get along with well enough to spend years or decades with? How many lack baggage/want to have kids when you do/have their life somewhat together/etc./etc./etc.? It's scarcity mentality because women you'd want to have kids with are scarce. Abundance mentality works for more casual relationships because there are countless women you'd plate; there aren't countless women you'd have kids with so abundance mentality in that area is misguided.

Any woman who demands that you expose yourself to undue risk for no reason is low quality, and doesn't love you as much as you think she does.

From her perspective there are a million reasons to expose you to the risk of marriage. She's from a good family, right? Her, her family, and her social circle have good morals (as we traditionally define them) right? She's going to think you're a catch and won't take your presence for granted, right? She's going to love you, right? She's going to be good enough that she'll have other good options, right?

That type of woman isn't low quality, yet every single one of these traits will make her want marriage and fear kids outside of marriage. The ones that aren't directly related to her will back up the exact same desires and fears with massive societal pressure from every angle. The last one is the most powerful -- her value means she'll have plenty of other high value men who would marry her. If you're the absolute best man you can be then maybe she'll think she can never get anyone else as good as you; outside of that ideal situation why would she settle for a guy who demands kids outside of marriage when she can pick another guy who's just as good but wants to buy her a ring?

[–]Senior Contributorcocaine_face 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

She may want (in the sense that most girls want) marriage, and in fact I'd argue that the type of girl you're talking about would, without further prompting try to go marriage track if she could wrangle it - but here's where you come in.

You tell her your position, and why you won't get married. Explain you'll be committed to her, you can have a party and a ring, say vows in front of priest if you want to, and she won't have to tell her girlfriends she's not "really" married.

Done. Hamster fed. Make your own "marriage contract" that gives both of you power of attorney over each other in case of incapacitation.

She wants social validation, being princess for the day and the emotional support that you won't abandon her. Provide her those things and she won't even think about a one-sided contract that hurts you. Hell, if she bitches about it just ask her if she plans on leaving you one day. If not, then it's not an issue. Flip the script.

And if she balks, NEXT HER. Women, even "quality" women are simply not that scarce. If you can find one, you can find another. And if you can't - if she's literally the perfect girl you've ever met, and no girl can be amazing as her, well, you've found a unicorn.

And unicorns don't exist. So you're wrong.

There's simply no reason to sign a marriage contract. Everything you can have with one, you can have without one.

[–]disposable_pants 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That's as good of plan for a sidestepping the marriage question as I've seen, but my suspicion is that a court would see this as a common law marriage (especially with kids, cohabitation, and a ceremony involved), and then you're back to square one. Maybe a really good prenup in there would outweigh that, but I'm not sure. Either way, this is the type of discussion we should be having about marriage -- one that recognizes it's role in a life that includes children, and one that focuses on how to minimize the long-term risk.

The point of my top-level comment was that brushing off the issue of kids with "just don't get married", "just find someone else", or "just don't have kids" is neither realistic nor particularly useful.

[–]Senior Contributorcocaine_face 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Most jurisdictions (at least in the US) don't have common-law marriage, so it's not really an issue for me or US readers, but in some areas (like Canada) yeah that's definitely an issue.

[–]2Overkillengine -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They are immensely realistic and useful.

One, men get more time on their reproductive clock than women do. Men can afford to wait.

Two, governments that enforce marriage laws need people cohabitating and breeding new generations of wage slaves in a steady cycle of supply.

If men en mass refuse to marry, cohabit, or breed, the governments will either have to resort to overt warfare on men to force compliance (and risk losing) or revise the marriage laws to be less exploitative.

[–]javi404 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

On the contrary, a woman who won't have kids with you outside of a marriage (I mean the contract, not a party or title) is a lower quality woman than a woman who will.

You mean a woman who will hustle you into marriage before she has kids with you.

[–]javi404 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I originally misread your post. You are correct. If a woman demands marriage, its a huge red flag.

[–]kevkos 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (28 children) | Copy Link

imagine the quality of woman that will have your children out of wedlock and compare that to LTR material

My beef with this is LTR definitely does not have to mean marriage. Marriage is a social construct, LTR is a voluntary form of being in a relationship.

[–]disposable_pants 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (27 children) | Copy Link

Exactly, so a woman you'd marry would be even better than LTR material. I used LTR in that part instead of marriage because plenty of men have (reasonably) decided to completely eliminate the possibility of marriage while everyone has LTRs on the table. The type of woman who will have your kids without marriage isn't the type of person you'd want to be in any long term relationship with, be it marriage or otherwise.

[–]Senior Contributorcocaine_face 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Yes. It is. That type of woman recognizes how much risk you'd put yourself at, and puts aside her distaste of not signing a contract - to be content with titles and a party - or hell, possibly not even those - that's a quality woman. That's a woman who cares about you.

Defining part of quality = won't have kids without marriage is a mistake.

[–]disposable_pants 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

That type of woman recognizes how much risk you'd put yourself at, and puts aside her distaste of not signing a contract - to be content with titles and a party - or hell, possibly not even those - that's a quality woman. That's a woman who cares about you.

AWALT -- women are self-interested. The only way a woman could truly care for you is if she knows she'll never get anyone else like you, and in reality that means she's 2-3 points below your SMV. Raising your own SMV to 8-9 and raising kids with a 6-7 may be a viable strategy for ensuring your children grow up in a good household, but no woman in a more equitable SMV relationship is going to care about you enough to put your well-being over hers.

[–]Senior Contributorcocaine_face 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

She is self-interested, absolutely.

And if she places the self interest of possibly taking your money away over the self interest of your affection, well, why did you want her again?

[–]disposable_pants 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

And if she places the self interest of possibly taking your money away over the self interest of your affection

All women do this; there is no if. If some women did this and some didn't obviously you'd choose the latter, but you can't make that choice; AWALT. The question here is how to have kids when all women are like that -- "just find one who isn't" isn't an answer.

[–]Senior Contributorcocaine_face 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I can make that choice, there are women who do that.

Hell, my sister is one of them (she's in an unmarried LTR with her fiance of 8 years, has a kid. She's a schoolteacher, he's a college football coach).

This isn't exactly an uncommon arrangement.

I'm clearly not convincing you, so I'm just done here.

Good luck with your marriage. You're definitely right, there's no way around getting married, so you might as well just do it. You've got no choice, no power over the situation, right? So if it all blows up, it isn't your fault. Totally.

[–]disposable_pants 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

she's in an unmarried LTR with her fiance of 8 years

So there's a plan in place to get married... I don't see how this supports your point. And an eight year engagement certainly is an uncommon arrangement, to the extent that an engagement a little over half that long is used as a humorous premise for a movie.

I don't understand how what you're saying isn't NAWALT. You're saying some women act out of self interest (out of love?) for your benefit. AWALT says that doesn't happen, or happens so infrequently and can be trusted so little that it's not worth relying on.

[–]Senior Contributorcocaine_face 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, there's no plan to get married. That's just the title they call each other. It's just a way to denote more commitment on each other's part.

In a previous era they'd be common-law husband and wife.

[–]Senior ContributorDemonspawn 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Raising your own SMV to 8-9 and raising kids with a 6-7 may be a viable strategy for ensuring your children grow up in a good household

Yeah... so?

I'll take 2-3 points below me in SMV and a 9-10 in RMV to have a lifelong non-marriage relationship with.

but no woman in a more equitable SMV relationship is going to care about you enough to put your well-being over hers.

So you think it's a better strategy to take -0-1 in SMV with a 6-7 in RMV?

I'm not understanding your logic here...

[–]disposable_pants 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'll take 2-3 points below me in SMV and a 9-10 in RMV to have a lifelong non-marriage relationship with.

I'm pointing out that the type of SMVs we're typically shooting for on this sub (at or above your own) for plates are less likely to be good long-term partners and highly unlikely to act as /u/cocaine_face describes. The lower SMV/higher RMV tradeoff isn't discussed often on here and I think most men are reluctant to sacrifice any SMV.

[–]2Overkillengine 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

The type of woman who will have your kids without marriage isn't the type of person you'd want to be in any long term relationship with, be it marriage or otherwise.

Back when marriage 1.0 standards were in effect, sure.

That is not the present though. Insisting on an unbalanced contract that is the current state of marriage is now a red flag.

[–]kevkos 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Or putting a contract that essentially says "together forever" on a relationship at all is a red flag.

[–]disposable_pants -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Insisting on an unbalanced contract that is the current state of marriage is now a red flag.

Then you aren't going to have kids with a high value woman, at least not until a decade or two down the line if A) marriage contracts become more balanced or B) society becomes far more accepting of kids born out of wedlock. Seriously, what high value woman is going to carry your children without a ring? Zero, because they can find a guy 90% as good as you who will marry them at the drop of a hat.

[–]2Overkillengine 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Meh. Put your life savings on the roulette if you want. Just don't lie to anyone about it being a roulette.

And that 90% guy? Sure, he'll get married. All bets are off though as to whether the kids are his or the 100% guys, since the current state of marriage contracts in Western society allow a woman to commit paternity fraud and still get cash and prizes in a divorce.

[–]disposable_pants 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

You're completely ignoring the issue at hand: How to have kids with marriage in the state it's in today. Everyone on here knows the risks of marriage; you're just beating a dead horse by pointing them out.

[–]2Overkillengine 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

It's simple- don't get married. If she wants you badly enough, she'll jump at the chance to bear your children, exploitative marriage contract or not.

You are presenting a false dichotomy that the only way to have children and a high value woman in your life is through marriage.

High value women don't need an exploitative contract to keep a man chained to them.

[–]disposable_pants -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

If she wants you badly enough, she'll jump at the chance to bear your children, exploitative marriage contract or not.

Not a chance, especially when she has plenty of potential suitors. Imagine your ideal woman. She's from a good family, right? Her, her family, and her social circle have good morals (as we traditionally define them) right? She's going to think you're a catch and won't take your presence for granted, right? She's going to love you, right? She's going to be good enough that she'll have other good options, right?

Every single one of these traits will make her want marriage and fear kids outside of marriage, and the ones that aren't directly related to her will back up the exact same desires and fears with massive societal pressure from every angle. Put yourself in that type of woman's shoes. A man like you comes along and are somehow the best man she's been able to land in a serious relationship (I say "somehow" not as a knock on you personally; it's just unlikely that out of the hundreds of men who've approached her romantically you're clearly the best). She can:

  • Bow to your demands for kids outside of marriage. She alienates her family and makes all family interactions with you testy as hell, most of her friends look at her funny, eventually her pregnancy outside of marriage comes up at work and that gets weird, if she's in a church group/any sort of socially conservative organization she loses major standing, because you're a high value man she gets super paranoid about you leaving her, etc., etc., etc., OR
  • She marries one of dozens of other guys who are almost as good as you and who don't demand kids outside of marriage. Everything else is far easier.

The first option is clearly worse. Hell, the only reason she would even entertain it is if she's sure she'll never get anyone as good as you again -- if she's dated someone better in the past, received attention from someone better in the past, or if she's just optimistic she won't even consider the first option.

Convincing a high value woman to carry your children outside of marriage is in no way realistic.

[–]2Overkillengine 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

as we traditionally define them

You are still stuck on trying to overlay marriage 1.0 rules and benefits onto the current situation. Good luck with that.

She's going to love you, right?

Lulz. Until she finds someone better that she thinks she has a crack at keeping, realistic or not. Then that contract is about as binding for her as toilet paper- she is free to wipe her ass with it at will. You however, will be held responsible at all points.

She's going to be good enough that she'll have other good options, right?

Irrelevant as long as you are her best obtainable option. If you are not, the marriage contract does you no good anyways.

Bow to your demands for kids outside of marriage.

It's not a demand, it is an offer. She is free to refuse. If she demands you engage in an exploitative contract (modern marriage) then you should be wary. Plus, you are still making the mistake of assuming marriage 1.0 morals and standards as being in effect. That assumption will be the death of you.

She marries one of dozens of other guys who are almost as good as you and who don't demand kids outside of marriage. Everything else is far easier.

Yup. Let that poor schlub eat the exploitative contract risk. There are plenty of other women out there too.

The first option is clearly worse.

Only if marriage 1.0 rules and mores are in effect- they are not, unfortunately, no matter how badly one wants them to be.

Convincing a high value woman to carry your children outside of marriage is in no way realistic.

You don't have to convince her. Just be her best option and she'll convince herself.

[–]Endorsed ContributoriBrokeRSA -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Good job playing into your fictional "high-value" wife's frame, bro.

[–]kevkos 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Disagree. My point was that a voluntary LTR is a healthier setup than a marriage (which is much more involuntary after papers are signed), if you're after long term survival or just happiness. Neither route guarantee that, but so many problems come with marriage that there is no point to it.

[–]disposable_pants 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

My point was that a voluntary LTR is a healthier setup than a marriage

Agreed. Where it gets tricky is when a desire to have kids enters the equation. All women prefer marriage before kids, high value women (the kind you'd want to LTR) can demand it, and any sort of workaround (e.g. having a ceremony but no contract) quickly turns into a common law marriage. That's why marriage is worth discussing; anyone who plans on having kids with a high value woman is going to have to deal with it in one form or the other.

[–]kevkos -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's irrelevant what women want. And no not ALL women prefer marriage. But yes most prefer a huge expensive wedding, diamond ring, etc. Doesn't mean that it makes sense or will lead to long term happiness.

Yes common law marriage happens but this again doesn't make it right. We're talking about what is the best setup in terms of relationships. Marriage, no matter what form, becomes involuntary. Agreeing to put a contract on a relationship that tries to ensure "together forever" is a pretty horrible idea no matter what form it takes.

[–]kevkos 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Totally agree, +1, and marriage is bad for everyone even women. The key with all of the marriage posts is we have to make sure to separate marriage from LTR.

You can have a successful LTR, EVEN with kids. In fact it will likely be healthier than having a marriage with kids.

LTR = voluntary choice to be in the relationship. Anyone can leave at any time and that's a GOOD thing, this means you AND your sig other will more likely be on your best behavior, unless you want them to leave you.

Marriage = relationship based on a contract, enforced by LAWS which do not favor the man and allow the woman to behave shittily if she chooses to do so, and it's MUCH harder to get the fuck out of it when you change your mind about her. Kids believe it or not actually know when their parents are no longer in love, or HATE each other, and are better off with them apart.

So why get married besides that you are following along with society and tradition for tradition's sake?

[–]sampson1587 points 11 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Can confirm, I am a married man here. I took the redpill just a few months back. I can agree that no young man should marry until he has vested that woman over and over agian.

I have seen too many men get married and as soon as she has her intended litter she splits with over half of his wealth and paycheck. It is a life ruining event every time. These coworkers I see this happen too are always burdened with loosing half their homes, half their paycheck and sometimes they even give away more than half in order to protect their own retirement pensions, knowing that that could be their only light at the end of their tunnels.

I know a little about my own grandfather's divorce, and while his wife had been cheating, she still got the kids, until the kids decided she was crazy and then moved in with dad. But she had already gotten her claws into their son and this eventually led to a falling out between the two of them, that led to them not speaking to one another for almost 5 years, until he passed away. (my mother was the eldest daughter of the family) my little sister still remembers seeing my uncle crying his eyes out at his own fathers funeral because they never got to say their last goodbyes, because of the evil shit his mother planted in his brain that drove a wedge into what should have been a strong father son bond.

heed the warning young men, DO NOT marry too young, trust us older wiser men, while my marriage is not yet to end in the scrap heap, my wife has all the pitfalls of every woman (YES AWALT) she is greedy, does not plan, wants what she wants and wants it now, what's hers is hers and what is mine is hers, and I am attempting to establish a foothold on the relationship in a carefull manner without ending in divorce (a fine line i walk)

I have reat aathol kay's book married man sex life, and am following the ideals set forward there. I am looking for more books. I am also taking the initiative and doing my own thing without asking her permission first and letting her build her own dread game. no more mr nice guy. Improving my SMV and passing every shit test with reckless disinterest. And so it begins.

But remember teh initial warning men, DO NOT MARRY. at least not until she has proven herself time and time again. (personally if my wife left me, I would never marry again.)

[–]javi404 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

personally if my wife left me, I would never marry again.

Because every married man I know says exactly this, I am really glad I never married and never will. Maybe I was lucky that I had kids young and feel no need to get married for that reason (the reason they always sell you is to get married and start a family.) Don't drink the coolaid marriage is for suckers.

[–]faded_jester 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Challenge me to get married" lol

Just because you can do something doesn't mean it's to be done. There is no real logical reason for men in the US to get married...and no amount of shit testing/shaming/whining is going to make me change my mind. To me this like saying "I challenge you to give me all your money and start over with nothing!"....um yeah I'm sure it would be challenging...but why the fuck would I do that?

[–]hagenvontronje4 points 11 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

People are advising marriage now? I've been gone for several months. Appeals to pride that involve "manning up" and losing nearly all leverage are for suckers.

[–]SgtBrutalisk 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We had an influx of recent posts by some nobodies in TRP who advocare for marriage. Possibly mass trolling.

[–]1rporion 11 points12 points13 points 11 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

You know what?

Where I live she won´t get half my stuff and/because prenups work.

My problem is that I would only marry to have children and I cannot even imagine having them ripped out of my life.

The really fucked up thing is, even if a woman were ready to make concessions, she can´t, the law won´t allow it.

[–]1FunAndFreedom 15 points16 points17 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

At best a prenup can protect you in the same way a motorcycle helmet will protect you, you'll live but you still may be fucked up pretty bad.

[–]bassivemalls 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Don't know where you live, but prenups in America at least only protect you from assets you attained before marriage. Everything you earn after you tie the knot is fair game. So, unless you're an older guy who's already assembled some wealth it's not worth it.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

A prenup can be overruled by a judge if they suspect something foul.

[–]Meglomaniac 22 points23 points24 points 11 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

a prenup will be thrown out of court for so many bullshit reasons.

Apparently even just telling a woman you wont get married without a prenup is 'coercion" or putting her under pressure to sign it.

[–]Ibex3D 10 points11 points12 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

For real? That's ridiculous! The law treats women like children who have no agency over themselves but gives them all the power of an adult. Such bullshit.

[–]PM_Me_For_Drugs 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well yeah, because they're oppressed by all men. Obviously.

/s

[–]Senior ContributorDemonspawn 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The law treats women like

Like they are a 55% voting majority who shows strong traits of group think and in-group bias while only paying 1/4-1/3 of the taxes which support the government they are controlling.

[–]Ibex3D 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

.... I can see why it's a good plan when you put it that way...

[–]1rporion 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Yeah well, in Austria it won´t.

[–]Meglomaniac 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I have always respected the german/austrian style of government.

I always thought that the idea of taxing the western half of the country to rebuild the eastern half was a brilliant idea that frankly made germany the powerhouse it is today.

[–]singeblanc 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

See also: Unions with real power, not neutered and left with a single card labelled "strike or no strike?".

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow because wanting to make sure you hold onto your money is so coercive. Poor helpless woman couldn't just not fucking marry you if you're being so coercive?

[–]Senior Contributorcocaine_face 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And it doesn't cover income earned during the marriage.

[–]1independentmale 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My problem is that I would only marry to have children and I cannot even imagine having them ripped out of my life.

There's little to nothing you can do about it. In most first world countries, if the mother wants out, she's out and the kids go with her. This is the world we live in, unfortunately. Your only other options are adoption, if you can find an agency willing to even consider a single father, or pay a woman to carry your child and give up all rights at birth.

[–]R4F1 9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Marriage is a personal choice, that people make with their own conscience, religion, family, whatever. People who try to guilt-trip members for being married, or challenging them to marry, should get an automatic warning and/or ban. TRP is amoral, we judge by ideas and arguments, not appeals to emotion.

[–]kevkos 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No guilt-trips, just raw facts that show how bad marriage really is.

I think the laws are horrible, especially towards men

However, I think what should be focused on more here is the actual concept of marriage and trying to put "together forever" in a contract, which as TRP knows, is impossible.

[–]R4F1 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They are horrible. Which is why people need to state the facts, instead of making emotional arguments to or fro.

[–]RosewoodPill 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

One of the most intelligent posts yet. The marriage part is the hardest pill to swallow, because men are "gay" or "weird" if they dont get married. The threatpoint makes it too risky though.

[–]javi404 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thank you very much for posting this. As someone who has experienced this favoritism of women in the courts first hand (and I didn't even get married) I always tell young men here in the US, don't fucking do it. There is not positive to getting married in the west period. Why would you ever place a bet with those odds. I don't care who it is, don't let anyone tell you or bully you into marriage no matter who they are. Not family, not friends, not your SO. This isn't the 1930s. There is no positive benefit whatsoever for a man to get married these days.

[–]NeopolitanAfterglow 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

Also getting extremely tired of the marriage apologists polluting this forum. It should be a topic that's open and shut in the span of a sentence or two, not some deep and philosophical matter that's explored in a multi-part series.

[–]kevkos 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, isn't it funny how thinks like AWALT are considered undebatable around here but for some odd reason marriage, totally not red pill, seems to be okay with many?

[–]disposable_pants 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

Because TRP is realistic, and realistically many men either are currently married or will find themselves married in the future. If it's something that happens with significant frequency it's completely reasonable to discuss.

[–]NeopolitanAfterglow 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

The issue isn't with talking about married men, or how to cope with married life, divorce, etc.

The problem is with TRPers talking about how to GET married. Basically "I'm thinking about making a big mistake in the near future. What's the best way to go about making this mistake?" and then getting serious responses. It's bullshit.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This. One of my close friends is a financial advisor, had clients who told him to not marry, had to redo portfolios and move assets to the wife, and has female clients who strategically divorce to build up their assets. Several years ago he asked me if I would gamble with half of every thing I own. Of course not.

Now it's what you said. "What's the best way to go about making a huge mistake?" He seems unhappy with his decision. I think he's being pressured by his very traditional family. Maybe he's paranoid about marriage ruining the vibe and I agree.

[–]disposable_pants -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

The problem is with TRPers talking about how to GET married.

I can understand this question if it pertains to having kids. No high value woman is going to want to have kids with you outside of marriage, so as dicey as it is marriage is a part of the equation.

[–]Senior Contributorcocaine_face 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

How are you defining "high value" woman here?

You absolutely can find a low partner count, pretty, young girl who will have children with you without getting married.

If you want, throw the party and call her your wife, but don't sign the contract.

If you've got a girl sufficiently in your frame - and you should, to have kids - she'll do just about anything to please you. And if a girl won't have kids with you without signing a contract?

Walk away.

Drop her.

You can do better.

[–]disposable_pants 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

How are you defining "high value" woman here?

  • Good family
  • Her, her family, and her social circle all have good, traditionally defined morals
  • She doesn't take your presence for granted; she knows you can leave
  • She loves you
  • She's good enough to have other good options

Any woman with these attributes will want marriage.

If you want, throw the party and call her your wife, but don't sign the contract.

This is potentially a workable strategy but I wonder how different a common law marriage of this sort would be from a legally binding marriage in the courts. Some sort of prenup, a ceremony, but no legal marriage might be the best idea for everyone involved.

If you've got a girl sufficiently in your frame - and you should, to have kids - she'll do just about anything to please you.

If what I want is different from what she wants (and, per my definition of a high value woman above, she'd want some form of marriage before kids) and she truly is high value, she'd walk away because she has other options, too. A woman who does shit she doesn't want to do just for you isn't as high value as you think -- either she doesn't really mind doing those things and is just shit testing you or she doesn't have the option of finding a similarly high value man who will be more conciliatory.

And if a girl won't have kids with you without signing a contract? Walk away. Drop her. You can do better.

This is plate mentality, because there are countless women who are suitable plates. Very, very few women are suitable for a relationship that produces children, so while you still want to display abundance mentality around her the reality is that women like her aren't abundant.

[–]Senior Contributorcocaine_face 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

You're defining quality as a woman who DOESN'T want to do things for you just because you're you (that she wouldn't want to otherwise)?

That's straight bluepill thinking. Any woman worth her salt will do things for her man that she doesn't want to do.

It really sounds to me that you've bought into the equalist nonsense that women should be as dominant as their men.

[–]disposable_pants -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

What is unrealistic about this:

If what I want is different from what she wants (and, per my definition of a high value woman above, she'd want some form of marriage before kids) and she truly is high value, she'd walk away because she has other options, too.

That's how self-interested parties with options would handle requests they don't want to fulfill. Both women and men are self-interested; a man with a demanding plate would find someone else; why wouldn't a woman with a demanding man find someone else too?

Any woman worth her salt will do things for her man that she doesn't want to do.

No, she'll do things she doesn't mind doing, or at least isn't strongly opposed to. You want her to make dinner? Sure, she doesn't mind that. You want her to have sex with you in a public place? She's not into that, but she's not actively opposed to it, so sure, she'll do that too. You want her to get pregnant with zero guarantee you'll be around when the kid pops out (remember, she's well aware that you can get other women)? Why would she take on a massive financial and societal risk with nothing from you?

[–]Senior Contributorcocaine_face 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Because women are naturally submissive and like to tend to the needs of a man they're in awe of. That's how it works.

You're assuming women are far more logical about relationships than they are. If you're willing to be sincere, stand your ground and walk away - it shows just how serious you are, and how important it is to you. Your job of convincing her is a hell of a lot easier than a divorce would be on you.

[–]NeopolitanAfterglow 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You have this completely backwards. You're saying that a quality woman will only stay with you if you commit. The reality is that any woman who's willing to leave the relationship because you didn't hand all your power over to her is not, and would never be, a quality woman. The ONLY way a woman can be a quality partner is if she values YOU more than she values a superstitious and unreasonable contract. And the only way to find that out is by making the options mutually exclusive.

I LTRed a Catholic girl who said she would never even live with a guy without marrying him first. She dreamed about her future wedding day just like all girls do. Well, after about a year of saying NO to all her bullshit requests, she came around. She would have been willing to live with me, have kids, etc, and never get married.

[–]Senior Contributorcocaine_face 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

You're unicorn hunting.

There are no unicorns.

This is bluepill thinking.

This is why AWALT is repeated so often.

Even a "quality" woman, so described isn't THAT rare. You're acting like even if you're on your shit, the only way you'll get such a woman is if she drops out of the air, like magic and graces you with her presence.

You're giving her your balls before you even marry her.

[–]disposable_pants 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

There's a difference between unicorns and a woman that's high enough value that you'd want kids with her. Every month or so someone does a rough calculation and concludes that ~5% of women meet even a handful of standards you'd want for the mother of your child. Women like this are rare -- potentially even rarer than 5% depending on your personal standards, where you live, etc. -- but if you spin enough plates you should run into one eventually. Think about it:

  • Assume you discover TRP at 25
  • You pick up a modest number of plates each year -- let's say a new one every three months, so 4 annually
  • By 50 you've had some form of months-long relationship with 100 women
  • Even if just 5% of women meet the standards you'd want for someone you'd have kids with, you should have plated 5 of those women

Now assume you're a little more proactive in spinning plates; maybe a new one every two months instead of every three. All else being equal that gets you 5 ultra high quality women before age 42. That's not unicorn hunting, that's a dedicated approach to finding someone worth having kids with.

[–]Senior Contributorcocaine_face 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

First off, you keep mentioning this rough calculation. Please, provide it.

Second off, if you're going objectively after a certain goal, it should be very easy to discount a girl almost immediately. A plate every 3 months? Hardly. You should be able to weed out most LTR candidates within the first 15-30 minutes of a date. At that rate, if you're really dedicated, you've got dozens of women you can sift through a month. If you can't sift out a girl within 30 minutes as to whether she might possibly be a good LTR candidate - learn how to do so.

And the final crux of the matter is that you seem convinced these women (which I think are far less scarce than you do) won't be able to be convinced to not sign a contract. I simply don't think that's the case. The girl doesn't care about the contract. She wants to feel you won't leave, she wants to feel like she's "made it", and she wants to be the certain of attention.

Calling her your wife and throwing a party do all of those things.

[–]NeopolitanAfterglow -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Any woman with these attributes will want marriage.

Any decent child wants ice cream for dinner. Doesn't mean they're a lousy child, and it doesn't mean you can't get them to come around to reason.

[–]disposable_pants 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, a child wanting desert and a woman making a life-changing decision are the exact same thing.

[–]fhghg 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's explored in the promise keepers sub, probably.

[–]KilluaKanmuru 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's clear as day that marriage is just a bad business deal.

[–]ultrasuperthrowaway 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Not if the wife is rich and you just surf all day.

Marry high income, high net worth women only.

Guys need to raise their standards.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hear Hear!

This is a very good post! The man is right and we should not be arguing about getting married or not. Its a fact that in the west, marriage's costs outweigh the benefits.

Do not fall for the "Love" bullshit. She'll love you, til she doesn't need you. Keep reading the sidebar material. Do not try to feminize the material.

[–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

All of the ECs and older members arguing against marriage aren't young, angsty guys in their 20s who are "regurgitating the sidebar."

Some of the EC's have gone through marriage bullshit too... Some more than once. When they say marriage is a crappy deal fucking believe them already!

If I told you I had a stock for you but you had to put everything down on it and if it was successful you'd get to keep your money (no return) but if you failed you lost half of everything would you take that investment? Hell no.

[–]cascadecombo 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Don't tell people to do either, show pros and cons and each man is then required to decided on his own.

[–]javi404 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

If you get married you have a risk to loose half of your shit, and half of the shit you will earn in the future.

If you don't get married, you don't have that risk.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Wait. So you're telling me, in the U.S. you don't just lose half of your shit after divorce, but also everything you earn afterwards is halved to continue supporting your ex wife? And people still get married in your country? That's fucking ridiculous.

[–]javi404 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Alimony to "maintain the lifestyle she is used to"

My mother dated a divorced guy for many many years when I was growing up. He was still paying alimony years and years later because his ex wife never got remarried and never got a job.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Is that so? Fucking really? I can understand child support, but this?! And your people are mostly okay with that bullshit?

[–]javi404 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I am not okay with it and many people are not as well but it is still there.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alimony#Alimony_reform_in_the_United_States

Examples of why I will never marry or advise any young men to get married.

http://nypost.com/2014/11/25/man-tries-to-stop-paying-alimony-over-ex-wifes-polygamy/

http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/stasi-robin-williams-30m-alimony-ex-wives-contributed-death-article-1.1906241

[–]cascadecombo 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

And?

If I get in a car and drive on a weekend I run the risk of being hit by a drunk driver.

If I talk to a girl in a bar I have a chance to have her jealous ex try to fight me.

If I move to a foreign country I run the risk of having many things happen, that won't stop me from doing what I want to do.

Each person will decide for himself, don't tell them what to do, show them what may happen so they can understand. This isn't some sound tunnel where people come just to be told what to do.

[–]javi404 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you get in a car and drive you don't have a 60 percent chance of getting hit by a drunk driver. Of course everything on life has a risk. But the level of risk needs to be taken into consideration.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I see male dentists graduate all the time & they immediately finally get a physically attractive spouse. She gets knocked up immediately & spending his new income on suvs, new houses, renovated kitchens & multiple vacations per year. The wives address the guys by their last names in public. But you know what? These dumbfucks deserve it because they lack social intelligence & patience to find an ethical partner that actually cares for them. People love to blame their partners & don't want to own up to the partner they decided to pick. Nobody forced you to pick your financial & emotional rapist.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

you due to the threatpoint she now has on your life and the power exchange that occurs from marriage.

And don't think she's going to threaten you with divorce one day, and you laugh back in an alpha way and she crumbles and says "I love you really honey, I'd never leave you".

No. Gradually increasing demands. Expecting you to do half the housework (as well as all the breadwinning and man jobs). Sulking about how miserable it is being the woman of the house. Demanding more and more. Giving less and less. Sex will happen only when you've exceeded last month's efforts. Creating arguments which subconsciously you'll address in some way, and then she'll figure out somehow that you care. Perhaps even because you're trying to make things work (and yes - trying to make things work is why she created the argument, to detect how much you care, what you'll put up with. and no, you cannot win because just when you get the hang of this, she'll start crying that you no longer care about her).

She knows in some deep part of her lizardbrain that all she has to do... is gradually slowly make things worse for you and better for her. After all, she'll laugh to herself... what are you gonna do, leave?

[–]SgtBrutalisk 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

My cousin came the other day with his wife and she kept saying "How about I divorce you?" over and over. They got a child together...

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My aunt did this semi-publicly, my own mother did it when I was young (and even fucking told ME).

They know they have this power.

Men need to wise up to how disadvantaged they will be in marriage, and that while they have to take financial responsibility for their children (state enforced), they may not get to spend much time with them if the mother chooses otherwise.

These are the rules gentlemen, make your moves accordingly.

[–]4delicioustreats 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

And don't think she's going to threaten you with divorce one day, and you laugh back in an alpha way and she crumbles and says "I love you really honey, I'd never leave you".

She'd have no reason to if your SMV is higher than any other guys she can get with. Start with it being higher than hers. 10 may roll through town and there is nothing you can do about that. He'll fuck your wife, he'll fuck your daughters, he'll fuck your plates... Nithi you can do about it.

Sex will happen only when you've exceeded last month's efforts.

Sex will happen every time she is ovulating if you're on track. Keep her at home. Fuck her good. Fill up her " love tank" (with your high quality semen). Keep your SMV high and she won't be able to get any better.

Creating arguments which subconsciously you'll address in some way, and then she'll figure out somehow that you care. Perhaps even because you're trying to make things work (and yes - trying to make things work is why she created the argument, to detect how much you care, what you'll put up with. and no, you cannot win because just when you get the hang of this, she'll start crying that you no longer care about her).

Shit tests and balance the beta. MMSLP has instructions on this.

She knows in some deep part of her lizardbrain that all she has to do... is gradually slowly make things worse for you and better for her. After all, she'll laugh to herself... what are you gonna do, leave?

You keep some dread. Humans go ape for things they cannot have. Make sure she see's her friends flirting with you.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

She'd have no reason to if your SMV is higher than any other guys she can get with.

You do not have the highest SMV she can get. She will meet higher SMV one day, and chances are he'll be looking for an easy lay.

Even if you're top 1%... that means 1% of the population is better than you.

And as you say - nothing you can do about it. Except not get married and effectively pay her to leave you.

Sex will happen every time she is ovulating if you're on track.

Sex for 2 days a month then, in between the tantrums and the bleeding? Woohoo, see me queueing up to get married.

Dude... seriously... the answer is don't get married. Keep your options open. Your post reads like "marriage is fine if you're RP", and it's really not. Be alpha while she's ovulating, be beta/comfortable while she's not ... oh god fuck that shit.

I kept track of my last girlfriend's cycle only so that I could avoid her for the three days she went batshit crazy.

[–]4delicioustreats 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Your choice, of course. For me I'm ok with my place in the world. If kanye wants to fuck my girl, then there's nothing I can do about it. I'm not going to get distraught about it.

In the meantime I'll make sure if she spreads her legs for someone else, there will be 2 more to replace her.

[–]thebalrog_ofmorgoth 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

if she is dead-set on getting married, I think that highlights that she may not be as quality of a woman as you might've thought.

This just doesn't make sense. It's been said time and again on this sub that it is in the best interest of a woman to get married. Every woman with a half-decent relationship with her father has been told to never give up her pussy unless she is married to a good man. We also know they don't always follow daddy's advice.

But I would consider it a sign that I have, in fact, found an intelligent woman with self respect if she insists on marriage. I sure as shit would, if I were a woman.

If I happen to be with a woman who is just fine with starting a family without a ring (i.e. following her biological imperative and making sure her children are provided for by me) i would be seriously suspicious of her quality.

[–]javi404 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

You are a fucking moron, I don't care if she went to Harvard and has a PHD. The only reason women get married in the west is to turn a man into a paycheck.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I hear from people, usually men, that they are getting married for the tax benefits. I figure their woman/family/church pressured them to man up and that's the best they can come up with. I laugh inside.

[–]javi404 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly this. At a certain point I had to tell my family "Listen, I don't believe in marriage so stop fucking asking" because I was sick and tired of hearing my mother ask when I was going to get married. I feel sorry for the men that didn't man up all the way and tell their woman/family/church to fuck off. I told my woman in the first few months of our relationship that I don't ever intend to get married and that if she didn't like it she could go find some poor sucker to marry. That was years ago at this point. Anyone who things marriage will make them happy, fix their relationship or make for a happy family w/ children is deeply misinformed.

[–]thebalrog_ofmorgoth 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Where exactly did I contradict that? Quote me, if you would.

[–]javi404 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

But I would consider it a sign that I have, in fact, found an intelligent woman with self respect if she insists on marriage.

You are saying that if a woman with self respect insists on marriage she is intelligent?

I would say she is intelligent, and more intelligent than you if you marry her. She generally gets all the rewards in a marriage (and after), you get nothing but risk.

[–]thebalrog_ofmorgoth 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Sure. Sounds like you agree with me then. I never mentioned marrying anybody. Don't put words into my mouth.

[–]javi404 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think you have managed to confuse yourself as well as me.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

People mostly misunderstand common law marriage. If you present yourself as married for a period of time, you can become common law married. Living together and raising children do not lead to common law marriage unless you present yourself as married.

[–]4delicioustreats 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In Canada you become common law with 6 months of cohabitation. Then you can have alimony and child support payments. Even for kids that are not yours-- not just paternity fraud, even if you live with a Mom with a 8 yr old for 6 months you can end up paying.

[–]TheRedPillMan1 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Listen everybody can have his own opinion. I don't blame guys for not getting married but just don't pretend that it's the better solution than getting married.

For instance what stops your unmarried SO from leaving your ass with the kids to go live with her parents while you pay for the kids? What stops her from bringing a guy to the house you're renting together so that she can fuck him all day while pissing you off?

[–]Glenbert 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There have been a lot of posts lately addressing...

Is this not the very definition of concern trolling?

[–]CanadianMastermind 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm not a legal expert by any means, and I know it varies from region to region, but most places in North America there's very little difference between 1) being married, and 2) being common law.

In my province, for example, you will be declared common law after living together for 24 months and satisfying a few other criteria (sharing expenses, clearly displaying to others that you're a "couple" and not just roommates, etc). After that, you're eligible for 50/50 split of resources upon separation, just as if you had been married.

So you can't escape the drawbacks of marriage just by not getting married. In most places, you'll have to do a lot more than that. Never having kids with someone, not living with them, not sharing expenses, etc. Because if you do those things, you'll be declared common law and will essentially be married in the eyes of the law.

[–]javi404 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Glad I don't live in one of those fucked up jurisdictions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common-law_marriage_in_the_United_States

[–]BCFtrip 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

One of the points of this sub is thinking for yourself realistically, you can decide what to do. Very few commands should be given here.

[–]2Overkillengine 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

One of the other points is relaying pragmatic information instead of misleading people.

So a "command" not to mislead others about the risks/rewards of marriage for men is apropos.

[–]BCFtrip 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What I'm speaking negatively about was the marriage challenges, not advice about avoiding it.

[–][deleted] 11 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]2Overkillengine 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

Yes. Do it outside of the marriage contract.

It's a fucking piece of paper, it is not magically empowered with "good environment for kids".

[–][deleted] 11 years ago* (14 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]2Overkillengine 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Children need the security of stable parents.

That can be done without the piece of paper. The piece of paper alone does nothing to provide that.

Piece. Of. Paper.

[–][deleted] 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]2Overkillengine 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A juvenile repetition for a juvenile fantasy.

You are still basically in the same legal position married or not if you have children and live together. You still put all of your wealth and freedom on the line.

This argument presumes common law marriages are in effect. This is not true in all western regions. Invest in your relationships accordingly.

The marriage ceremony is not a piece of paper though. It is a public promise that has a profound psychological effect on those involved.

Lol! This is not necessarily a good thing. The man gains a Sword of Damocles hanging over his head called Divorce Law unless he is an outlier that married way up economically. I imagine that does have a profound psychological effect.

[–]javi404 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

You're so brainwashed on so many levels I don't know where to even start addressing your post. You should practice some critical thinking. Where is the community and god when your wife decides she is bored and fucks the neighbor then leaves with your kids and you end up paying the bill for it with child-support, and then loose have your shit. Where is your community and your god then?

[–][deleted] 11 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]javi404 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

About 40% of married couples with kids stay together

40% success rate is good odds?

[–][deleted] 11 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]javi404 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

You know, humans have a really bad superiority complex. When some random stranger on the internet believes they are better than "common people" it makes me wonder what makes them believe that. What makes you better than the "common people"? Are you a super human? Why do you think you are better than the average asshole?

[–][deleted] 11 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]javi404 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You are missing the point, even above average people have terrible divorce rates. You don't know what the other person is going to do. Marriage is for the sheep.

[–]Sesa_Refum 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You know those big-ass animals, tigers or w/e, that will dig their sharp claws into prey to take them down, but then its those claws that are nice and curled at the tips so they tear a phat joo¢y chunk of flesh back out of whatever gazal or cantelope they decided to fuck up that day?

Getting married is letting a woman sink her claws into you and then praying they won't pull out

[–]WingsnLV 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Who gives a shit? Marry, don't marry. It's up to the man to decide what is best for his own life. If you are making this decision based on feedback from strangers on the internet you have more that child support and alimony to worry about.

[–]PlanB_pedofile 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

We need posts for the already married man though. Some are currently shit deep with 10 years in a marriage with kids. Go back 10 years and they would of foregone the whole marriage deal.

Thing is, red pill deals with is you cannot undo the past. What happened has happened. You're married now. You're fucked for life. Now lets take back control of the ship and at least navigate this better.

Young men in your teens and twenties. CONGRATS! You all have advanced knowledge and red flags to avoid these traps. You know what older men had to look up to in our pre marriage days? Al Bundy. Married with Children was pretty much a comedy show with underlying redpill truths.... even playboy Hugh Hefner got married.

So for the married posts on here. This is for those who put the ring on years ago and need navigation for this modern shit world.

[–]Modredpillschool[M] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You know the rules

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yep, identifying gender is a no-no. Let the ideas stand on their own merit. Deleted that post.

[–]long-lostfriend 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I agree that any talk of "challenging" should be shut down. However, so should the bitching at those of us who are pulling off some semblance of a Red Pill marriage.

[–]4delicioustreats 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I am married. I'd say if you already are married, probably may as well stay married, the downsides are already present. There is very limited upside. Consider all of the following if you're thinking about married. This would be my ruleset:

  • She comes from a very traditional family where infidelity and divorce will get her ostracized.
  • You have known her >5 years, preferably >10 years and have observed her behavior. Watch out for typical cock carousel riding, worship by betas and bar star, travel slut or any other behaviors that will make her think she is God's gift to humanity
  • Potentially a good thing if she's Christian, though this is decaying at an alarming rate. Lots of misandry in the more young, "Liberal" or "Seeker sensitive" Churches.
  • SMV of at least 2 points lower than you. "Marriage material" relates to her personality, not her body or her sexuality. Therefore you will certainly marry uglier than you can bag.
  • She has hit the wall and knows it.
  • She is traditional in that she understands that marriage means the end of male friends, end of girls nights out, end of putting on a red dress and strutting her stuff. She understands that a "night out" will mean a home roasted chicken and another couple coming over.
  • You are ready and willing to get on the hardest fucking treadmill of your life. Marriage is a dumping ground of yourself into something that is not you. It is akin to death. You will have to continue to get better every year for the rest of the marriage.
  • You understand that any form of weakness, real or perceived, your fault or not, will result in divorce, alimony, child support and general bitch behavior.

Ok, Got all that? Now tell me you want to be married.

[–]thelotusknyte 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I often tell myself that if I had discovered TRP before I got married I probably never would have.

What about though, for people who are religious and believe in their religion? Setting aside the discussion as to whether they're being duped or not, do you think of a solution for people who don't have sex before marriage etc?

[–]winter-sleep1 points 11 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Can you get married before god and not the state and just have a non legal-binding ceremony?

[–]thelotusknyte 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's an interesting concept and I would have no complaints about that at all. I'm LDS, though, and I know that Mormons generally, revere the State almost as much as God (not consciously, but it's their culture), and probably wouldn't be able to conceive of such a thing without suspicion.

[–]StupidButSerious -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Do like me, go to Japan and get some hot 30 years old woman who will cook and clean for you without giving shit. That you can marry.

[–]Echelon64 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As a non-white Gaikoku no Kata I don't think any Japanese parent will be fond of their daughter marrying a filthy gaijin especially if he isn't white.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The problem is that everybody in this sub seems to have married a terrible cunt - which describes the vast majority of women in the world. Not to be sexist, because I think most men are fucking retarded, too. So much hyperbole in every response.

Impulsive people with terrible values make terrible decisions. But marriage has benefits if you aren't an idiot about it. After almost 25 years, marriage has been a good investment for me and my wife.

We're both professionals. She makes good money, even working reduced hours. When she wasn't working with the kids, I still put money into to Roth IRAs which have appreciated nicely tax free. If we weren't married, I wouldn't have been able to contribute to my Roth during those times. (Now we make too much money to contribute!)

There have been times that I have been covered under her work insurance and vice-versa. It has probably saved us tens-of-thousands of dollars over the span of a career. Couldn't have done that without being married.

We've also benefit from increased allowable tax deductions. Now, we're probably a special case. We're well compensated and looked at marriage as just that: an investment and legal contract. Even if we got divorced someday - which I highly doubt (we dated for almost seven years before marriage, so we've been together for 30+ years and raised two kids), we'd both be better off than if we merely went at it alone.

[–]javi404 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You benefited because the fucking tax laws favor married people and not single people. That just makes you a lucky asshole, not smart for getting married. Lucky you married the right women I would say. Many guys marry the right women and end up in a nasty divorce 34-45 years later or better yet, die from a fucking heart attack leaving the wife to enjoy his retirement money. Good luck with the rest of your marriage. Just because you won a prize doesn't mean all young guys should all place a bet at the table.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, the tax law favors married people. That's exactly my point. The OP was about marriage as an investment. I consider the tax implications when I make investments, and I'd suggest that you do, too.

If tax law didn't favor marriage, we might not be married - though I assume we'd still be together.

Also, if my wife or I died the other would enjoy a large part of the retirement - without paying the estate tax! Another benefit of marriage. Though a substantial sum of our money has been put into a trust for our children (and mainly grandchildren education).

I agree that it is mostly about finding a good woman, and there aren't enough to go around. Most men couldn't have one as good as me, and I pity them as much as I blame the woman they settle for.

[–][deleted] 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]ModMachiavellianRed[M] 27 points28 points29 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

but I have seen a post or two telling the anti marriage brigade to tone it down a bit

It's not up to you to decide the tone, that's a job for the mods, and people who step into those shoes always get banned for trying to influence the direction of the sub. That's how we have survived this long and stopped constant bickering/in-fighting between users. We want to keep the central message/set of principles strong. If you want to diverge from that, that's fine, but all your platitudes and passive aggressive arguing on the sub only detract from the community. If you had cogent counter-arguments that appealed to male incentive, men would react kindly to your suggestions. Instead you ask them all to be sacrificial lambs, and throw in the "patriarch ideal" and "civilization" as bait. Those points bear merit, but they are idealistic, not pragmatic. Pragmatic advice would be "get married in the Philippines, divorce is illegal there so she can't stop you seeing your kids or take your money away from you."

I read your post history. You mention a happy 15 year marriage. Well, most men were passed up time and time again, raised by single mothers or blue pill parents and have never felt like society gave a remote fuck about them. You have some nerve asking these same men who have "finally figured it all out" to "suck it up, be a man, and start a family." Shit, I think even some of your "people who don't do this are immature" talk is one of the same passive aggressive tactics feminists use to shame men into compliance. I won't accept this shit on my sub. Sure, all communities have immature people in them, but most the men here know the score, have done a rational, self-aware cost-benefit analysis and concluded that marriage is more hassle than it's worth for them.

As such, this sub is almost entirely anti-marriage. A lot of the men married here were married before they found TRP, have been to hell and back and are trying to regain ground in their marriage and regret ever getting married. You seem almost irrationally predisposed to marriage. As if you perceive it glowingly, positively, as if it's this healthy wonderful thing. That's so deluded that it's painful to even comprehend, this type of merry delusion doesn't belong in TRP.

In good conscience, we cannot advise men to sign-up for something they will, in all probability, suffer from. We leave the choice down to you, you can bet against the odds and risk it all - but we don't recommend such recklessness. Most men like the idea of a family, but not the idea of having a family taken away from them. When men have no legal power, they lose their kids and their wealth on a woman's whim. "Being alpha enough" will reduce your chance of divorce, it won't eradicate it. You're still playing Russian Roulette. The women are fickle and the law/family court is anti-male.

Your argument is less rational than ours, and you seem to think you represent some kind of camp and that there is some kind of "polarized debate" but there is isn't, you're a nail that's sticking out and I'm going to hammer you. If you want to have these kinds of chats, that's what /r/purplepilldebate is for. You should have took your sentiment there, rather than airing it out here. I like to allow diverse opinions, but there are limits. Yours are doing more harm than good, creating all this meta bullshit for us to wade through. Who gets to decide that? The mods, not you.

You are banned - permanently.

[–][deleted] 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]ModMachiavellianRed 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes. He is still holding onto the idea he can have a happy family and live happily ever after as long as "he's alpha enough." He just refuses to get it.

[–][deleted] 11 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Jesus, is it totally impossible for a man to fall in love with a woman, and vs versa, where they live together for better or for worse, sickness and in health?

No, it's not totally impossible. It's just really unlikely. Don't invest half your worldly goods into nigh-impossible ventures, such as lotto tickets or marriage.

[–][deleted] 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And some trailer trash just won more in the lottery than I'll make in my lifetime - just sayin'. Doesn't mean I'm gonna be cashing in stock options for Powerball tickets though, because most people who play the lotto lose.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

A woman is a proponent for marriage, shocking...

[–][deleted] 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well then, it should be easier for a woman to be red pill, your kind of just realizing your own nature. Even still, it's tough to break away from hamstering that you're amazing still and rationalizing, so kudos on you for that. But seriously your husbands lame, hit me up sometime;)

[–][deleted] 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]TRP Vanguard: "Dark Triad Expert"IllimitableMan 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

my husband is smarter than me and in a higher career position.

Which only proves red pill ideas (the concept of hypergamy) you have a man who is superior to you, which is how you are capable of loving him.

When you come into forums like this you have to step outside of your own little world, your intimate experiences, your frame of references, and how you feel about your husband, and see THE BIGGER PICTURE. Women don't give a shit about men inferior to them, and feminism is socially engineering a society where women often get ahead at the expense of men (quotas, earning more degrees, they have a same sex parent, lots of boys don't etc.) How this plays out is you have all these high-earning women who want nothing to do with men who make less, which is a lot of men. They all chase the cream of the crop, women don't date down like men do, in societies where the men have a lot of power, they all get women. In societies where they socially engineer "female equality" lots of women just aren't attracted to lots of men because they're at similar power levels (or he has less.)

You managed to lock a guy down, and you've known him since you were young so you haven't been cock hopping (like most women have) and he's been high quality enough to stop you pressing the big red button. That isn't common in the contemporary west. Just because you could be considered an exception to the norm, it doesn't mean we're wrong about the things we say, and really, as a sub, we don't like taking time out to explain things to women who cannot reconcile their own lives with our beliefs and views. We don't really owe you an explanation.

You're a girl in the men's locker room while you're in TRP. If you cause shit, you will be removed post-haste. Better you don't even mention the fact you're a chick, because we don't care and don't really like the idea of women being here anyway. Women tend to subvert discussion and, like you have done, make it all about them and their significant other/people they know rather than understand the concepts abstractly as we do here.

All the best to you and hubby, but you're better off in /r/redpillwomen.

[–]psychedelicjourney -1 points-1 points-1 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I also don't understand how you guys focus everything towards "in the west", it's all the same anywhere else.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

That's because the west is where feminism and SJWs have been the most successful at spreading their diseased ideology

[–]psychedelicjourney 1 points1 points1 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I think you guys should look outside of the west for a while. Sweden comes to mind. It's the same anywhere else, as I said.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Sweden? Outside the West? Am I reading this right?

[–]Senior Contributorcocaine_face 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

The term, "west" refers to western culture. This boils down to the regions that have historically been Christian, and frequently (but not necessarily) the term is applied more specifically to areas that were Latin Christian (Catholicism & Protestantism). Sometimes nations that have "caught up" are included too - like Japan and South Korea.

Sweden has been a part of the "west" since before the concept of the "west" even existed.

[–]LifeAtPeace 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree with this. Marriage is a bad deal not just in the west but even in the east. Asian countries which were considered to be full of traditional RP women are also polluted. The laws being made in these countries are also slowly killing the institution of marriage.

[+]TheRichness -6 points-5 points-4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm a man. I want to get married and have babies.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nice people men or women can have a horrible marriage or a good one. It's up to the people involved to build trust & keep the relationship (if that's what they want.). It doesn't have to mean marriage necessarily. People that are hellbent on "being married" are trying to fill some other ego status or legal checklist.

[–]usku -3 points-2 points-1 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Some irony in this. If you can't manage a woman, don't get married. Simple as that.

You can argue it's a bad deal all you want. Hamster it all you want.

But like any high risk investment, the rewards are there for the taking. Hedge your bets, and pick the right investment.

Marriage is not for everyman. Many will fail, horribly. Not because of lack of effort but because you made poor decisions choosing.

[–]javi404 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

the rewards are there for the taking

the rewards are there for her taking.

FTFY

[–]1oldredder 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

the rewards are very low and lower than what a man can get without a marriage. The risk is high and the reward doesn't match.

Not because of lack of effort but because you made poor decisions choosing.

That's because the right choice requires knowing how to read minds and the future. It's no better than running across a field of landmines and saying those who blew up choose poorly while those who get through are good.

The notion is nonsense

[–]Moldy_Gecko -5 points-4 points-3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You guys are actually bringing this up more than people have been suggesting marriage. And people aren't even promoting marriage, they are just giving you the best options should you choose to accept it. Most of what I suggest is about marrying in Asia. While you guys may not be 20 somethings espouting the sidebar, you are making it sound like it.

[–]solaris1990 -4 points-3 points-2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Marriage is a good deal for some men and a bad deal for others, largely depends on their circumstances, sexual market value, etc. I will say that while I only know U.S. marriage by reputation though, it does seem quite appalling, but you're making grand claims about the entire West? I am quite sure that we are not all as nuts about alimony and child support but anyway the burden of proof is on you if you're to make that statement. Is marriage in Sweden so fucked? France? Germany? Spain? It might be... but you must provide some evidence otherwise it's mainly empty words.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter