TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PierceHarlan Archive

View 1,248 posts and 4,249 comments by PierceHarlan on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2959

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/01/16 12:19 PM
2498

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/03/16 06:29 PM
2264

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/02/13 12:29 PM
1530

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/10/14 11:23 AM
1414

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/01/16 01:24 PM
1379

False AccusationsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/02/15 01:10 PM
1211

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/09/13 11:43 AM
1175

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/02/16 06:35 PM
1163

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/02/16 01:31 PM
1105

False AccusationsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/03/15 11:53 AM
1055

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/06/14 04:25 PM
1042

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/12/14 01:30 PM
1025

FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/02/15 01:14 PM
996

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights21/05/15 01:06 PM
975

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/07/13 01:46 PM
969

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/01/15 08:29 PM
900

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/10/15 03:14 AM
898

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/09/15 01:18 PM
867

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights20/01/16 01:48 PM
826

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/02/15 01:37 PM
820

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/12/14 02:26 PM
813

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/05/13 12:21 PM
806

Raising AwarenessPierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/02/15 02:22 PM
789

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/05/15 01:23 PM
780

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/02/11 08:12 PM
779

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/06/13 10:51 AM
751

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights31/08/15 04:42 PM
736

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/06/12 01:43 PM
709

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/02/14 04:12 PM
677

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/09/15 11:31 AM
663

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/10/13 11:36 AM
659

NewsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/01/15 12:02 PM
656

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:50 PM
655

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/03/12 12:03 PM
645

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/04/14 11:17 AM
634

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/02/13 01:18 PM
632

FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/01/15 06:52 PM
628

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/03/14 12:05 PM
574

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/08/12 11:11 AM
565

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/07/14 07:45 PM
563

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/10/12 11:45 AM
549

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/01/13 01:13 PM
544

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/05/13 11:56 AM
525

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/02/13 02:56 AM
505

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/01/11 08:23 PM
500

Edu./Occu.PierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/09/15 12:58 PM
486

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/04/13 11:25 AM
475

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/06/12 02:48 PM
462

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/03/15 01:00 PM
456

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/05/13 01:24 PM
447

OutragePierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/02/15 02:16 PM
442

Raising AwarenessPierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/04/15 10:46 PM
440

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/07/14 02:42 PM
440

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/02/14 04:08 PM
424

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights31/01/14 03:26 PM
421

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/06/14 05:59 PM
408

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/02/16 02:24 PM
407

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/05/13 12:12 PM
405

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/06/15 11:47 AM
405

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/09/13 12:37 PM
400

re: FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/06/14 12:03 PM
397

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/12/13 11:48 AM
394

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/12/12 02:52 PM
391

False AccusationsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/11/14 01:15 PM
378

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/11/10 12:51 PM
378

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/12/12 04:00 PM
372

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights20/03/13 01:34 AM
368

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/06/14 01:10 AM
364

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/06/15 02:46 PM
350

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/05/13 01:42 PM
341

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/05/13 11:37 PM
338

False AccusationsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/01/15 12:20 PM
333

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/12/14 03:45 PM
332

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/05/14 04:23 PM
332

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/03/11 05:42 PM
329

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/01/11 01:06 PM
322

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/11/15 01:28 PM
313

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/09/16 11:12 AM
310

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/01/16 01:46 PM
303

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/11/12 11:36 AM
301

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/08/12 01:01 PM
300

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/05/15 01:25 PM
295

False AccusationsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/03/15 12:33 PM
294

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/01/13 12:10 PM
291

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/07/15 12:39 PM
291

False AccusationsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/01/15 09:24 PM
291

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/01/13 01:10 PM
278

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/05/11 11:22 AM
277

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights20/07/16 07:31 PM
277

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/09/14 08:11 PM
274

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/06/12 01:25 PM
273

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/12/12 12:28 PM
271

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/05/13 08:34 PM
270

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/08/13 10:45 PM
269

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/09/13 07:17 PM
269

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/11/15 02:13 PM
267

re: FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/06/14 12:59 PM
265

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/10/14 01:12 PM
265

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/04/11 11:03 AM
262

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/07/13 02:00 PM
262

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/02/15 12:40 PM
260

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/03/13 01:47 PM
258

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/02/11 05:11 AM
254

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/04/13 04:01 AM
253

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/10/10 12:07 PM
252

re: FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/06/14 02:40 PM
252

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/02/13 01:50 PM
248

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/08/12 03:36 AM
248

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/05/11 10:02 PM
247

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/03/16 12:49 PM
247

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/07/13 07:58 PM
246

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/11/15 01:13 PM
245

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/07/14 06:41 PM
244

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/12/13 02:29 PM
239

False AccusationsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/07/14 07:32 PM
239

OutragePierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/06/14 07:48 PM
235

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/06/14 12:50 PM
234

Edu./Occu.PierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/10/15 08:20 PM
233

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/06/13 12:18 PM
230

OpinionPierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/02/15 03:50 PM
223

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/05/13 12:58 PM
223

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/08/13 11:34 AM
222

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/03/13 12:55 AM
221

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/08/13 08:13 PM
221

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/02/15 01:14 PM
220

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/01/13 12:41 PM
220

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/08/15 01:25 PM
220

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/07/14 07:53 PM
218

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/10/15 11:14 AM
213

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/02/11 05:45 PM
212

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/12/10 03:46 PM
211

False AccusationsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/07/14 11:43 AM
210

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/09/14 02:05 PM
210

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/02/14 12:41 PM
210

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/11/13 02:56 PM
209

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights20/03/14 08:11 PM
209

Social IssuesPierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/03/16 02:13 PM
206

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/12/14 03:00 AM
205

FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/02/17 12:41 PM
204

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/09/10 05:45 PM
204

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/08/13 11:26 AM
204

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/08/11 12:36 PM
203

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/05/15 12:59 PM
203

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/06/15 12:01 PM
201

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/06/14 08:12 PM
200

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/10/11 11:43 AM
199

Activism/SupportPierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/10/15 02:29 PM
199

DiscussionPierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/12/14 12:05 PM
194

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/05/15 08:57 PM
194

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/10/11 01:12 PM
190

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/12/11 12:08 PM
190

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/12/12 07:14 PM
189

False AccusationsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/03/15 06:35 PM
189

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/06/13 11:24 AM
187

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/07/14 12:17 PM
187

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights21/11/14 12:15 PM
185

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/07/15 11:56 AM
183

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/05/12 12:39 PM
183

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/06/14 01:21 PM
181

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/06/13 12:55 PM
180

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/03/15 12:28 PM
179

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/02/15 01:47 PM
179

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights21/05/15 12:22 AM
177

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/10/11 12:24 PM
177

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights21/12/10 06:40 PM
177

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/10/11 12:33 PM
176

FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/11/16 02:28 PM
175

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/08/15 02:56 AM
175

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/06/12 02:56 AM
175

Raising AwarenessPierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/04/15 12:55 PM
174

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/10/12 11:42 AM
170

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/10/11 01:32 PM
170

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/03/11 11:42 AM
169

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/09/11 01:59 PM
169

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/03/16 02:31 PM
169

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights21/04/15 12:36 PM
167

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/03/13 04:04 AM
166

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/11/12 12:37 PM
164

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/05/13 10:59 AM
163

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/05/13 01:19 AM
162

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/03/11 07:56 PM
161

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/08/15 06:33 PM
160

Raising AwarenessPierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/02/15 12:33 PM
157

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/01/11 02:53 PM
156

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights20/05/13 12:11 PM
156

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/01/12 11:07 PM
155

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/12/13 11:17 PM
155

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/05/11 09:28 PM
153

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights20/03/14 12:11 PM
151

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/07/12 11:00 AM
150

FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/12/14 03:14 PM
150

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/12/11 04:09 AM
150

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/07/15 12:10 PM
149

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/02/12 05:18 PM
147

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/01/14 03:29 PM
147

False AccusationsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/04/15 01:34 PM
145

re: FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/10/14 11:53 AM
144

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights31/10/14 01:54 PM
144

ProgressPierceHarlan/r/MensRights20/02/15 01:48 PM
143

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/09/10 12:25 PM
143

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/08/13 11:42 AM
142

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/05/09 01:58 PM
142

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/08/13 08:05 PM
141

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/05/14 01:52 PM
141

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/01/10 02:00 PM
141

re: FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/11/14 01:28 PM
140

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/01/15 03:36 PM
139

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/08/13 06:14 PM
139

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/07/14 01:35 PM
138

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/09/14 02:38 PM
138

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/09/11 12:10 PM
137

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/03/12 07:24 PM
137

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/01/13 02:36 PM
137

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/06/13 04:41 PM
135

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/10/14 04:49 PM
135

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/08/12 11:07 AM
135

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/04/09 07:22 PM
134

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/10/15 08:29 PM
134

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/01/13 02:27 PM
133

FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/01/15 12:13 PM
132

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/01/16 05:20 PM
132

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/02/13 04:22 PM
131

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/04/14 11:37 AM
131

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/07/15 12:53 PM
131

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/02/14 11:44 PM
130

NewsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/07/14 04:34 PM
130

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/11/12 01:12 PM
129

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/11/12 06:48 PM
129

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/09/12 12:21 PM
128

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/10/13 12:46 PM
128

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights21/10/15 02:02 PM
127

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/01/13 02:44 PM
127

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/04/12 12:35 PM
127

re: FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/11/14 07:27 PM
126

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights20/12/12 01:00 PM
126

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/02/16 03:07 PM
123

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/01/13 12:13 PM
123

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/11/13 06:33 PM
122

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/06/10 12:27 PM
122

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/03/13 04:11 AM
122

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/11/11 03:33 PM
122

False AccusationsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/01/15 01:40 PM
121

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/02/13 01:17 PM
121

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/10/15 12:16 PM
120

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/02/16 01:03 PM
119

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights20/08/14 11:35 AM
119

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/05/14 12:41 AM
119

GeneralPierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/02/16 01:15 PM
119

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/01/12 12:32 PM
118

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/12/10 06:23 PM
118

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/08/15 12:05 PM
118

ProgressPierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/12/14 03:56 PM
118

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/03/14 12:54 PM
118

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/05/13 01:40 PM
116

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/04/13 12:19 PM
116

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/01/14 04:17 PM
116

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/10/14 12:30 PM
115

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/03/13 01:05 AM
114

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/10/12 03:52 PM
114

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/04/13 03:05 PM
114

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights21/08/13 11:18 AM
113

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/11/14 12:41 PM
113

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/08/09 11:23 AM
113

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/03/09 04:06 PM
113

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/04/12 12:01 PM
112

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/03/16 05:13 PM
112

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/05/13 12:20 PM
112

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/08/10 11:55 AM
112

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/09/12 03:10 PM
112

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/05/13 11:31 AM
112

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/12/10 02:11 PM
111

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/10/14 07:58 PM
111

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/03/11 12:24 PM
110

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/11/11 02:13 PM
109

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights21/10/15 12:00 PM
108

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights31/12/10 04:51 PM
108

FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/01/15 02:33 PM
108

Edu./Occu.PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/05/17 06:38 PM
108

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/04/13 11:26 AM
107

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/04/14 11:01 AM
106

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/01/13 01:01 PM
106

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/07/14 01:08 PM
106

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:14 PM
106

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights21/12/11 06:48 PM
106

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/09/14 11:59 AM
106

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/01/14 02:00 PM
105

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/11/11 01:25 PM
105

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/03/10 01:26 PM
105

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/09/11 09:18 PM
105

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/12/14 04:19 PM
104

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/12/13 02:01 PM
104

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights20/11/14 11:59 AM
103

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/01/13 08:31 PM
103

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/07/14 04:45 PM
103

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/05/14 05:40 PM
103

FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/01/15 02:09 PM
101

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/01/14 01:51 PM
100

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/12/09 06:35 PM
100

Raising AwarenessPierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/04/15 11:01 AM
100

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/09/14 08:33 PM
100

FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/02/16 01:06 AM
99

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/09/13 12:36 PM
99

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights21/03/14 12:30 PM
97

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/06/09 02:16 PM
97

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/11/14 01:40 PM
97

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/02/13 03:36 PM
96

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/12/13 06:50 PM
95

re: FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/07/14 01:39 PM
94

False AccusationsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/04/15 07:39 PM
94

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/03/13 12:39 PM
94

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/07/12 11:18 AM
93

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights20/02/12 05:16 PM
93

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/10/11 01:18 PM
93

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/05/13 10:45 AM
93

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/03/13 11:16 AM
93

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/01/11 06:54 PM
92

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/06/14 11:50 PM
92

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/12/10 02:53 AM
91

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/09/11 03:32 PM
91

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights21/07/14 12:31 PM
91

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/12/14 12:04 AM
90

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/09/10 01:24 PM
90

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/12/12 07:43 PM
90

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/12/13 09:48 PM
89

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/02/14 12:58 PM
89

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/07/14 05:20 PM
89

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/12/12 01:48 PM
89

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/03/13 04:53 PM
89

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/02/14 05:53 PM
88

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/11/15 07:22 PM
88

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/08/13 11:12 AM
87

re: FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:53 PM
87

Men's Rights NewsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/04/14 06:47 PM
86

Raising AwarenessPierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/02/15 01:23 PM
86

Activism/SupportPierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/11/15 02:03 PM
86

FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/11/16 03:11 PM
86

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/09/15 12:57 PM
85

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/05/11 12:05 PM
85

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/11/12 01:41 PM
84

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/09/15 03:03 PM
84

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/05/15 12:57 PM
84

FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/01/15 11:08 PM
84

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/07/13 12:14 PM
84

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/07/14 02:10 PM
84

NewsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/07/14 02:27 PM
83

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/02/15 04:25 PM
83

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/09/12 03:17 PM
83

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/02/16 12:44 PM
83

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/09/15 12:44 PM
83

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/03/13 11:49 AM
83

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/09/10 12:12 PM
82

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/12/09 05:37 PM
82

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/04/09 06:36 PM
82

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/08/12 02:22 PM
82

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/08/12 09:18 PM
81

DiscussionPierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/04/15 01:22 PM
81

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/02/12 02:34 PM
81

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/02/14 12:39 PM
81

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/02/14 03:04 PM
80

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/05/14 07:21 PM
80

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/02/10 01:22 PM
80

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/01/14 03:52 AM
80

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/07/14 12:07 PM
79

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights31/07/14 12:26 PM
79

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/12/13 02:23 PM
79

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/10/12 12:57 PM
78

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/07/10 02:12 AM
78

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/02/10 09:19 PM
78

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/11/15 12:58 PM
78

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/02/16 01:17 PM
78

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/03/13 01:30 PM
78

FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/12/14 06:24 PM
77

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/12/14 01:14 AM
77

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/11/12 09:03 PM
77

re: FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/09/14 01:36 PM
77

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/07/15 10:41 PM
77

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/03/14 12:54 PM
76

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/06/13 05:41 PM
76

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/02/14 01:10 PM
76

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/08/12 02:52 AM
76

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/10/15 02:40 PM
76

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/07/14 12:21 PM
76

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/05/15 12:17 PM
76

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/07/15 07:55 PM
75

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/04/09 03:18 PM
75

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/09/12 09:52 PM
75

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/11/10 02:18 PM
75

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/01/16 08:47 PM
74

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/12/14 09:12 PM
74

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/10/13 03:17 AM
74

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/05/13 12:45 PM
74

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights21/02/13 03:51 PM
74

False AccusationsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/02/15 04:05 AM
74

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/10/13 05:58 PM
74

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/02/10 01:38 PM
74

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/04/09 02:48 PM
74

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/12/13 01:50 PM
74

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/07/15 01:51 PM
74

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights21/03/13 01:30 PM
73

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights21/09/12 01:16 PM
73

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/08/12 11:38 AM
73

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/06/12 03:16 PM
72

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights31/03/14 12:02 PM
72

False AccusationsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/12/14 02:07 PM
72

re: FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/06/14 01:47 PM
72

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/10/15 12:32 PM
72

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/09/15 05:04 PM
71

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/05/13 04:12 PM
71

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/07/15 12:18 PM
70

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/08/15 05:26 PM
70

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/01/10 02:58 PM
70

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/11/11 12:44 PM
69

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/02/17 01:04 PM
69

FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/10/15 12:11 PM
69

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/11/09 06:40 PM
69

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/10/15 02:06 PM
69

Men's Rights NewsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/06/14 05:53 PM
69

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/11/13 04:39 PM
68

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/03/13 04:56 PM
68

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/04/13 01:02 PM
68

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/05/10 12:06 PM
68

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/09/16 02:47 PM
68

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/10/13 11:46 AM
68

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/12/14 03:32 PM
68

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/03/13 04:32 PM
68

False AccusationsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/01/15 08:04 PM
68

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/01/13 01:18 PM
67

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/04/09 02:30 AM
66

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:56 PM
66

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/02/13 03:15 AM
66

FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/11/15 01:58 PM
66

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/02/11 03:51 AM
65

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/10/14 12:30 PM
65

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/06/15 12:19 PM
65

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/01/13 09:43 PM
65

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/02/14 01:07 PM
65

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/06/10 01:03 PM
65

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/06/10 01:56 PM
65

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/09/10 08:15 PM
64

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/09/12 01:26 AM
64

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/04/12 01:56 AM
64

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/01/12 05:36 PM
64

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/09/09 02:53 PM
64

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/08/10 12:51 PM
63

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/06/14 10:29 PM
63

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/02/10 01:57 AM
63

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/03/14 06:07 PM
63

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/04/10 01:18 AM
63

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/04/13 10:44 AM
63

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/11/14 04:36 PM
63

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/02/14 01:24 PM
63

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/03/15 02:04 PM
63

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/12/09 06:32 PM
62

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/07/14 11:30 AM
62

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/07/10 11:30 AM
62

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/06/11 08:06 PM
61

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/05/09 08:07 PM
61

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/10/14 01:44 PM
61

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/09/11 04:10 PM
61

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/02/12 01:43 PM
61

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/09/09 01:11 PM
61

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/09/13 12:39 PM
61

False AccusationsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/03/15 12:45 PM
60

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/04/14 02:22 PM
60

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/05/14 02:18 PM
60

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/01/13 01:40 PM
60

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/05/14 02:19 PM
60

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/12/14 07:28 PM
60

Social IssuesPierceHarlan/r/MensRights20/10/15 02:46 PM
60

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/12/15 04:54 AM
60

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/06/09 06:25 PM
60

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/07/14 04:46 PM
60

re: FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/12/14 10:04 PM
60

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/11/11 01:41 PM
59

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/04/09 04:16 AM
59

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/09/12 11:45 AM
59

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/07/14 02:27 PM
59

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/07/10 12:26 PM
59

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/07/14 08:00 PM
59

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/08/12 11:55 PM
59

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/03/13 07:38 PM
59

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/08/13 07:18 PM
58

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/01/14 02:10 AM
58

Edu./Occu.PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/12/15 12:07 PM
58

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/08/14 02:52 PM
58

ProgressPierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/02/15 06:07 AM
57

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/09/10 02:25 AM
57

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/10/11 12:22 PM
57

Raising AwarenessPierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/03/15 12:26 PM
57

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights31/12/14 07:01 PM
57

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/12/11 06:47 PM
57

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/07/09 07:40 PM
57

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/01/10 02:17 AM
56

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/02/12 07:30 PM
56

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/11/15 01:12 PM
56

re: FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/06/14 10:42 PM
56

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/04/13 02:15 PM
56

re: FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/06/14 01:06 PM
56

Men's Rights NewsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/05/14 12:04 PM
56

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/02/13 04:41 AM
56

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/06/12 07:29 PM
55

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/12/09 04:19 PM
55

False AccusationsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/02/15 02:15 PM
55

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/09/09 01:08 PM
55

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/11/13 06:50 PM
55

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/08/10 04:12 AM
55

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/01/10 03:34 PM
55

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/05/14 02:15 PM
54

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/08/14 09:16 PM
54

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/06/13 01:00 PM
54

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/08/11 01:59 AM
54

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/11/13 07:35 PM
54

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/02/12 05:09 PM
54

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/06/10 02:09 PM
53

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/10/10 03:43 AM
53

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/11/12 02:14 PM
53

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/07/13 06:02 PM
53

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/09/09 12:32 PM
53

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/08/10 12:12 PM
53

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/08/15 05:21 PM
53

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/10/10 11:21 AM
52

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/10/14 07:34 PM
52

FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/08/16 01:53 AM
52

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/04/11 08:18 PM
52

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/12/11 12:51 PM
52

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/03/15 10:42 PM
52

False AccusationsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/01/15 12:14 PM
52

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/06/11 11:11 AM
52

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/09/14 05:53 PM
51

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/06/10 12:09 PM
51

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/09/13 12:18 PM
51

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/04/11 07:40 PM
51

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/10/12 11:57 AM
51

FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/12/14 03:09 PM
51

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/12/13 07:04 PM
51

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/01/12 05:02 PM
51

Raising AwarenessPierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/02/15 12:27 PM
50

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/02/12 08:06 PM
50

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/07/12 10:40 AM
50

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/12/16 01:51 PM
50

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/06/14 12:32 PM
50

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/11/12 11:59 AM
50

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/11/15 01:57 PM
50

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/06/09 12:38 PM
50

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/04/13 12:17 PM
50

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights21/08/13 10:34 AM
50

FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/02/15 12:48 PM
49

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/08/12 05:46 PM
49

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/01/12 12:34 PM
49

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/07/13 02:13 PM
49

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/03/11 08:58 PM
49

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/08/09 10:50 PM
49

False AccusationsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/04/15 01:33 AM
49

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/03/14 11:30 PM
49

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/05/17 08:28 PM
49

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/10/14 11:40 AM
49

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/12/09 09:06 PM
48

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/12/11 08:02 PM
48

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/03/09 04:54 PM
48

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/04/14 12:40 PM
48

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/07/11 01:36 PM
48

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/01/10 05:45 PM
48

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/07/10 04:15 PM
48

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/07/12 01:50 PM
47

False AccusationsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/02/15 02:09 PM
47

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/12/14 06:56 PM
47

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/03/13 01:01 PM
47

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/09/16 06:23 PM
47

Raising AwarenessPierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/02/15 08:26 PM
47

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/05/12 06:00 PM
47

False AccusationsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/02/15 12:16 PM
47

OutragePierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/05/14 08:01 PM
46

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/08/15 03:40 AM
46

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/07/13 02:52 PM
46

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/06/13 12:43 PM
46

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/11/15 03:35 PM
46

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/02/16 03:15 PM
46

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/03/11 03:01 PM
46

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/09/09 05:05 PM
46

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/08/13 01:55 PM
46

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/11/12 11:56 AM
46

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/03/10 03:33 AM
46

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/08/11 12:50 PM
46

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/03/14 11:12 PM
46

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/12/14 01:39 PM
45

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/08/12 02:03 PM
45

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/03/13 12:18 PM
45

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/10/09 12:18 PM
45

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/08/11 06:44 PM
45

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/03/09 11:23 PM
45

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/03/13 08:55 PM
45

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/11/09 02:43 AM
44

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/12/12 05:15 PM
44

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/01/12 12:06 PM
44

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/12/09 01:51 PM
44

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/01/10 02:26 PM
44

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/01/14 09:08 PM
44

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/10/14 05:21 PM
44

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/12/13 03:39 AM
43

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/06/16 11:46 AM
43

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/11/14 11:52 PM
43

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/05/09 12:32 PM
43

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/07/14 12:13 PM
43

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/02/10 02:58 PM
43

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/06/13 03:14 PM
43

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights20/01/14 09:01 PM
43

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights21/04/10 11:58 AM
43

False AccusationsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/04/15 12:02 PM
43

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/06/16 07:27 PM
42

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/06/09 12:50 PM
42

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/04/09 05:36 PM
42

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/05/17 06:33 PM
42

re: FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/10/14 02:12 PM
42

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/11/13 06:55 PM
42

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/05/13 12:02 PM
42

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/03/11 03:21 AM
41

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/05/13 03:29 PM
41

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/09/14 11:39 AM
41

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/07/14 04:49 PM
41

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/09/11 11:30 PM
40

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/05/09 05:41 PM
40

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/10/16 11:34 AM
40

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/10/13 08:42 PM
40

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/09/12 03:12 PM
40

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/05/09 12:01 AM
40

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/08/11 12:41 PM
40

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/09/09 12:50 AM
40

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/02/13 03:37 PM
40

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/08/09 03:07 PM
40

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/05/10 01:34 PM
40

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/08/11 06:35 PM
40

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/09/09 01:16 PM
39

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/01/10 03:38 PM
39

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/05/09 01:37 PM
39

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights21/02/13 07:27 PM
39

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/05/09 02:53 PM
39

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/06/09 02:38 PM
39

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/05/14 03:15 AM
39

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/02/11 06:16 PM
38

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/12/14 11:03 PM
38

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights20/04/14 04:45 PM
38

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/04/09 12:48 PM
38

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:16 PM
38

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/05/13 07:51 PM
38

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/03/12 06:14 PM
38

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/11/15 10:44 PM
38

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/06/10 12:16 PM
38

FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/11/15 01:29 PM
38

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/11/13 03:06 PM
38

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/03/13 04:45 AM
38

NewsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/07/14 01:13 PM
38

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/12/10 02:37 PM
37

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/01/10 08:04 PM
37

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/06/10 12:43 PM
37

Edu./Occu.PierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/01/19 01:34 PM
37

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/02/13 02:23 PM
37

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/12/13 12:25 AM
37

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/10/16 12:28 PM
37

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/02/11 11:19 PM
37

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/12/10 08:07 PM
36

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/11/10 01:03 PM
36

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/07/09 01:50 PM
36

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/03/10 02:50 PM
36

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/11/09 03:52 PM
36

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/04/13 02:02 PM
36

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/09/14 02:16 PM
36

AnalysisPierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/02/15 11:00 PM
36

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/11/09 09:55 PM
36

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/02/13 12:14 PM
36

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/01/16 09:34 PM
36

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/12/13 02:18 PM
35

FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/11/15 05:34 PM
35

re: FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights20/08/14 09:05 PM
35

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/05/11 02:29 AM
35

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/08/13 08:37 PM
35

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/03/10 11:30 PM
35

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/03/09 12:11 PM
35

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/03/11 05:43 PM
35

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/04/10 01:39 PM
35

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/10/09 02:46 PM
35

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/04/11 01:20 PM
35

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/06/10 03:02 PM
35

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/11/11 11:41 AM
35

GeneralPierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/10/15 01:13 PM
35

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/05/12 04:17 PM
35

Social IssuesPierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/10/15 09:55 PM
35

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/01/10 12:49 PM
35

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/05/13 07:56 PM
35

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/10/13 12:19 PM
34

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/10/15 11:37 AM
34

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/04/09 02:56 PM
34

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/09/09 10:18 PM
34

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/07/15 12:39 PM
34

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/09/09 01:50 PM
34

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/01/10 01:19 PM
34

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/02/11 03:05 PM
34

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights21/09/09 04:27 PM
34

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/08/10 02:57 AM
34

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/07/09 03:31 AM
34

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/01/10 11:50 PM
34

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/05/13 12:52 PM
34

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/01/11 04:33 PM
34

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/08/09 01:32 PM
34

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights31/01/11 09:36 PM
33

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/11/11 03:03 PM
33

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights20/05/09 10:52 PM
33

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/12/13 05:18 PM
33

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/01/11 02:52 PM
33

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/05/11 07:30 PM
33

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/07/12 10:43 PM
33

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/04/09 12:52 PM
33

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/01/10 12:45 PM
33

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/05/09 03:14 PM
33

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/02/13 08:27 PM
33

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/08/12 01:14 PM
33

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/04/11 06:22 PM
32

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/02/16 08:46 PM
32

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/01/13 02:39 AM
32

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/04/10 12:52 PM
32

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/11/12 03:37 AM
32

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/06/10 04:32 PM
32

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/11/11 02:10 PM
32

FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/08/15 11:29 AM
31

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/01/10 05:12 PM
31

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/06/10 01:20 PM
31

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/11/13 03:53 PM
31

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/08/11 01:59 PM
31

False AccusationsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/01/15 05:37 PM
31

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights21/11/14 11:12 PM
31

FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/10/16 01:44 PM
31

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/05/10 01:12 PM
31

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/11/14 05:21 AM
31

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/10/09 12:45 PM
31

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/06/12 06:43 PM
31

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/05/12 03:15 PM
31

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/12/11 12:29 PM
30

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/01/17 06:02 PM
30

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/02/14 11:02 PM
30

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/12/13 10:13 PM
30

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/09/11 02:59 PM
30

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/02/13 02:22 AM
30

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/09/11 04:00 PM
30

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/01/11 04:03 PM
30

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/10/09 09:56 PM
30

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/06/12 12:41 AM
30

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/06/09 12:04 PM
30

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/04/12 01:34 AM
30

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/05/10 12:36 PM
30

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/11/12 05:04 PM
30

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/03/10 02:51 PM
30

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/09/15 12:10 PM
30

Men's Rights NewsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/05/14 10:13 PM
30

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights31/03/13 02:34 PM
30

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/05/10 05:54 PM
29

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/01/12 06:09 PM
29

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/06/09 12:47 PM
29

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/01/12 07:58 PM
29

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:53 PM
29

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/07/11 08:12 PM
29

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/03/13 12:30 PM
29

False AccusationsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/03/15 12:57 AM
29

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/01/12 02:43 PM
29

Social IssuesPierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/04/16 04:15 PM
29

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/01/14 12:05 AM
29

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/06/11 03:10 PM
29

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/05/11 05:25 PM
29

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/08/14 12:02 PM
29

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/05/09 02:14 PM
29

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights31/01/15 07:35 PM
28

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/12/10 04:56 PM
28

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/01/13 05:45 PM
28

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights20/05/10 10:46 PM
28

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/07/14 04:30 PM
28

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/09/16 01:36 PM
28

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/03/10 12:07 PM
28

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/10/11 05:42 PM
28

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/04/10 12:34 PM
28

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights21/01/10 02:55 PM
28

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/12/11 02:15 PM
28

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/11/13 05:48 PM
28

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/11/16 01:08 PM
28

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/11/11 02:58 AM
27

Raising AwarenessPierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/07/14 09:41 PM
27

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/11/09 01:46 PM
27

Men's Rights NewsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/05/14 12:37 PM
27

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/11/11 12:49 PM
27

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/09/09 12:53 AM
27

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/07/09 05:08 PM
27

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/07/09 12:45 PM
26

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/05/10 11:26 AM
26

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/07/10 12:54 PM
26

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/05/14 01:38 PM
26

re: FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/10/14 06:33 PM
26

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/11/10 12:28 PM
26

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/08/12 04:50 PM
26

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/12/11 02:50 PM
26

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/07/10 01:45 AM
26

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/11/16 01:41 PM
26

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/02/12 01:00 PM
26

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/03/11 02:34 PM
26

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/06/11 02:05 AM
25

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/03/10 12:20 PM
25

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/05/12 10:14 PM
25

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/03/10 12:30 PM
25

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/05/14 12:48 PM
25

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights31/10/16 12:57 PM
25

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/12/13 01:27 PM
25

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/10/09 12:11 PM
25

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/03/11 12:19 PM
25

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/10/11 12:11 PM
25

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/01/10 02:01 PM
25

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/07/14 03:28 PM
25

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/05/17 06:37 PM
25

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/08/09 09:23 PM
25

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/10/13 10:40 AM
25

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/05/13 09:11 PM
25

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights31/01/14 10:50 PM
25

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/07/16 05:09 PM
25

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/08/10 02:10 PM
25

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/10/11 06:20 PM
25

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/05/12 03:17 PM
25

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/06/11 12:26 PM
25

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/09/11 10:43 AM
24

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/11/12 04:20 PM
24

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/09/14 09:28 PM
24

Edu./Occu.PierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/09/17 01:14 AM
24

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/12/14 05:51 PM
24

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/12/11 12:24 PM
24

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/08/11 02:24 PM
24

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/01/10 02:02 PM
24

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/11/12 11:50 AM
24

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/09/16 01:22 PM
24

FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights21/11/16 05:46 PM
24

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/11/10 12:28 PM
24

NewsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/01/15 05:22 PM
24

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/05/09 02:09 PM
24

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/05/17 06:42 PM
24

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/11/09 02:54 PM
23

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/05/13 02:33 AM
23

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/09/11 12:25 PM
23

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/02/12 07:34 PM
23

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/08/12 03:05 PM
23

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/11/13 07:30 PM
23

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/12/15 07:30 PM
23

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/01/13 06:27 PM
23

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/09/09 06:02 PM
23

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/11/09 03:07 PM
23

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/10/09 12:44 PM
23

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights20/06/10 03:30 PM
23

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/04/09 02:20 PM
23

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/08/09 03:33 AM
23

FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/08/16 01:44 PM
23

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights31/05/09 01:54 PM
23

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/10/09 01:53 PM
23

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/12/16 10:22 PM
22

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/09/13 02:39 PM
22

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/11/09 02:10 PM
22

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/12/13 03:04 PM
22

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/07/11 05:33 PM
22

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/09/11 06:24 PM
22

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/09/13 03:06 AM
22

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/12/12 12:20 PM
22

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/12/09 07:08 PM
22

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/10/15 09:54 PM
22

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/12/10 01:56 PM
22

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/05/11 05:08 PM
22

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/01/13 05:14 PM
22

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/04/16 01:15 PM
22

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/06/11 07:28 PM
22

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/09/09 03:06 AM
22

re: FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/07/14 08:58 PM
22

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:30 AM
22

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights31/07/09 07:17 PM
21

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/05/10 12:44 PM
21

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/12/14 12:15 PM
21

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/12/11 01:58 PM
21

FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/02/17 12:26 PM
21

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/09/14 06:40 PM
21

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/07/09 12:38 PM
21

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/08/12 05:43 PM
21

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/09/11 05:17 PM
21

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/12/12 05:35 PM
21

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/03/13 02:12 AM
21

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/01/11 10:26 PM
21

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/10/09 03:39 PM
21

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights20/03/09 12:07 AM
21

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/03/09 05:54 PM
21

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/03/10 04:41 PM
21

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/08/09 06:42 PM
21

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/01/11 05:01 PM
21

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/10/09 01:27 PM
21

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/09/13 09:56 PM
21

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/10/14 10:07 PM
21

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/08/11 12:14 PM
21

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/09/15 11:11 AM
20

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights20/01/10 01:49 PM
20

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/09/12 04:38 PM
20

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/06/10 12:53 PM
20

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/11/15 04:11 PM
20

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/10/11 11:57 AM
20

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/03/10 02:22 PM
20

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/03/13 08:42 PM
20

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/04/13 01:13 AM
20

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/09/15 06:44 PM
20

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/01/13 12:34 PM
20

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/07/09 12:12 AM
20

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights21/03/11 06:19 PM
20

QuestionsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/08/15 08:41 PM
20

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/08/13 10:07 PM
19

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights20/12/12 07:09 PM
19

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/08/12 08:42 PM
19

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/02/12 04:26 PM
19

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/02/12 10:07 PM
19

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/09/11 07:36 PM
19

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/03/15 01:13 PM
19

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/12/13 02:02 PM
19

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/03/13 01:41 PM
19

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/06/11 04:40 PM
19

Edu./Occu.PierceHarlan/r/MensRights20/02/18 02:22 PM
19

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/02/13 05:20 PM
19

Edu./Occu.PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/10/16 11:47 AM
19

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights31/08/11 01:46 PM
19

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/12/14 01:03 PM
19

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/06/12 02:54 PM
19

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights20/12/13 06:56 PM
18

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/11/10 03:58 PM
18

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights20/08/14 01:43 PM
18

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights20/01/11 01:36 PM
18

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/12/11 01:55 PM
18

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/11/10 12:26 PM
18

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights31/08/09 12:46 AM
18

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/05/11 06:43 PM
18

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/03/11 04:31 PM
18

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights21/07/10 01:08 PM
18

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/12/11 05:06 AM
18

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/11/11 03:11 PM
18

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights21/11/09 11:18 PM
18

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/11/11 12:04 PM
18

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/01/13 08:36 PM
18

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/02/12 12:16 PM
17

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/02/10 01:46 PM
17

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/07/12 03:49 PM
17

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/08/11 06:33 PM
17

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/10/11 01:51 PM
17

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/03/09 12:56 PM
17

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/01/10 02:25 PM
17

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/03/11 03:48 PM
17

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/02/11 08:57 PM
17

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/03/12 05:06 PM
17

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/10/09 05:30 PM
17

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/11/13 07:04 PM
17

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/07/10 01:30 PM
17

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/08/11 02:39 PM
17

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/05/10 12:04 PM
17

FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/04/16 01:29 PM
17

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/09/14 12:13 PM
17

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/12/13 11:52 PM
16

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/02/13 02:05 AM
16

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/12/11 05:36 PM
16

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/11/09 05:48 PM
16

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights21/09/09 10:30 PM
16

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/09/12 08:41 PM
16

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/07/13 01:16 PM
16

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/07/09 04:32 PM
16

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/01/12 02:53 AM
16

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/06/11 01:41 PM
16

Social IssuesPierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/02/16 06:17 PM
16

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/12/11 03:46 AM
16

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/03/13 09:58 PM
16

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights21/08/11 12:48 PM
16

re: FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights20/11/14 01:25 PM
16

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/11/11 01:50 PM
16

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/11/16 11:03 PM
16

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/10/09 02:09 PM
16

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/11/12 05:34 PM
16

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/01/16 08:53 PM
16

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/02/10 01:32 PM
16

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/01/10 12:20 PM
16

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/11/09 04:30 PM
16

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/07/11 07:04 PM
15

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/10/11 10:33 AM
15

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/02/14 02:58 PM
15

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/01/10 05:24 AM
15

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/06/10 12:23 PM
15

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/03/11 01:57 PM
15

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/09/09 01:14 PM
15

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/09/09 07:00 PM
15

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/04/11 01:37 PM
15

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/02/13 03:10 PM
15

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/09/11 02:01 AM
15

FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights21/04/15 07:45 PM
15

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/09/09 10:28 PM
15

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/07/12 01:15 PM
15

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/09/11 09:23 PM
15

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/11/09 08:55 PM
15

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/04/13 05:11 PM
15

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/05/10 11:56 AM
15

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/12/11 04:06 PM
14

Edu./Occu.PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/09/17 05:54 PM
14

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/02/11 03:15 AM
14

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/10/13 05:23 PM
14

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/01/12 06:03 PM
14

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/06/11 02:14 PM
14

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights31/01/13 01:57 PM
14

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights31/03/11 04:11 PM
14

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/04/11 04:21 PM
14

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/01/10 10:17 PM
14

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights20/08/12 12:40 PM
14

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/02/12 12:44 PM
14

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/09/10 11:08 AM
14

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/09/14 08:15 PM
14

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/09/09 10:02 PM
14

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/08/12 11:06 AM
13

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/07/11 02:29 PM
13

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/12/09 02:53 PM
13

Action Op.PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/08/14 08:17 PM
13

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/04/14 12:52 PM
13

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/01/11 06:59 PM
13

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/01/12 05:29 AM
13

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/03/10 12:56 AM
13

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/03/14 12:07 PM
13

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/12/09 12:05 PM
13

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/05/11 12:23 PM
13

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/07/12 08:12 PM
13

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/02/13 04:39 PM
13

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/08/11 08:36 PM
13

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/10/11 06:21 PM
13

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/01/13 03:18 AM
13

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/04/11 09:17 PM
13

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/03/10 02:43 PM
13

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/10/11 03:16 PM
13

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights31/07/09 07:17 PM
13

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/08/14 12:57 AM
12

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/05/14 02:00 PM
12

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/02/14 08:45 PM
12

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/09/09 05:02 PM
12

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/09/09 01:24 PM
12

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/08/11 02:24 PM
12

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/06/11 03:51 PM
12

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/10/11 01:39 PM
12

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/10/09 10:48 PM
12

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/06/12 04:03 PM
12

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/06/11 07:19 PM
12

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/04/14 10:52 AM
12

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/11/09 01:32 PM
12

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/12/11 10:38 PM
12

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/08/12 01:50 PM
11

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/07/11 08:47 PM
11

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/06/11 07:10 PM
11

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/12/13 07:57 PM
11

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/03/10 11:21 AM
11

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/04/09 01:25 PM
11

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/03/14 12:05 PM
11

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/12/13 07:20 PM
11

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/07/15 09:48 PM
11

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/03/10 01:53 AM
11

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/06/10 02:19 AM
11

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:26 PM
11

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/06/12 04:10 PM
11

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/09/11 12:33 PM
11

GeneralPierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/05/15 07:59 PM
11

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/03/11 04:57 PM
11

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/02/11 05:06 PM
11

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/12/10 09:18 PM
11

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/04/12 01:32 PM
10

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights20/03/11 03:28 AM
10

False AccusationsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/04/15 02:31 AM
10

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/09/09 02:19 PM
10

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/07/11 12:26 PM
10

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/12/14 12:41 AM
10

re: FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/10/14 02:20 AM
10

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:03 PM
10

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/07/09 01:37 PM
10

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/01/10 03:07 PM
10

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/07/14 09:54 PM
10

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/06/14 07:11 PM
10

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/08/13 09:14 PM
10

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/02/11 05:06 PM
10

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights20/10/11 01:32 PM
10

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/03/11 09:25 PM
10

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/02/11 03:46 PM
10

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights31/10/11 12:57 PM
10

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/12/14 01:02 PM
10

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/05/12 07:59 PM
10

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/02/12 01:07 PM
10

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/10/09 01:15 PM
10

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/12/10 09:23 PM
10

False AccusationsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/11/14 07:57 PM
10

Edu./Occu.PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/07/17 10:10 PM
9

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/04/11 04:08 PM
9

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/11/11 01:12 PM
9

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/09/09 02:43 PM
9

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/05/09 01:59 PM
9

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/01/11 05:57 PM
9

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/07/09 02:07 AM
9

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/05/11 09:40 PM
9

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/07/14 04:08 PM
9

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/11/11 07:26 PM
9

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/08/11 01:48 AM
9

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/09/11 03:16 PM
9

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/04/12 02:35 PM
9

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/09/11 02:27 PM
9

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights31/08/13 06:22 PM
9

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/08/14 11:37 AM
9

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/06/12 04:18 AM
9

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights21/06/11 08:57 PM
9

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/03/10 12:04 AM
9

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/11/11 01:41 PM
9

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/10/11 09:30 PM
8

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/12/10 03:26 PM
8

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/09/09 02:28 AM
8

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/07/11 01:48 PM
8

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/04/10 06:22 PM
8

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/09/11 01:05 AM
8

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/03/13 01:57 PM
8

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/07/11 03:58 PM
8

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:02 PM
8

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/07/12 02:25 AM
8

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/10/09 01:35 PM
8

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/03/11 02:31 AM
8

Edu./Occu.PierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/09/16 06:00 PM
8

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/08/09 04:11 AM
8

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/03/13 02:49 PM
7

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/09/14 08:58 PM
7

QuestionsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/09/16 04:01 PM
7

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/05/12 01:45 PM
7

Social IssuesPierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/10/15 02:07 PM
7

FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/05/15 09:21 PM
7

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/03/11 04:09 PM
7

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/06/10 08:54 PM
7

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/09/14 03:20 AM
7

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/10/12 11:19 AM
7

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/01/14 07:04 PM
7

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/04/14 06:42 PM
7

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/01/14 05:10 PM
7

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/06/12 01:28 AM
7

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/08/16 04:53 PM
7

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/07/11 12:23 PM
7

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights31/08/09 11:19 PM
7

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/11/10 02:59 PM
7

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/12/11 05:14 PM
7

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/10/11 09:06 PM
7

re: FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/04/14 02:23 PM
7

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/01/15 02:25 PM
7

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/11/11 11:12 PM
6

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/08/11 01:39 AM
6

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/07/12 03:28 PM
6

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/10/11 01:37 AM
6

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/12/10 02:50 PM
6

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/06/11 12:50 PM
6

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/01/13 08:30 PM
6

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/02/11 05:56 PM
6

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/09/11 09:12 PM
6

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/11/11 06:40 PM
6

FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/08/17 04:55 PM
6

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/02/13 03:57 AM
6

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/09/13 07:54 PM
6

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/06/16 09:06 PM
6

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/01/11 08:42 PM
6

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/03/16 12:02 PM
6

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/10/09 04:54 PM
6

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/02/14 09:29 PM
6

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/01/11 02:16 PM
6

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights21/03/11 05:39 PM
6

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/09/14 07:08 PM
6

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/01/11 03:59 PM
6

GeneralPierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/11/16 11:53 AM
6

Legal RightsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights26/01/16 12:39 AM
6

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/01/11 05:54 PM
5

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/01/12 08:34 PM
5

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/08/11 12:23 AM
5

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/01/11 07:11 PM
5

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/08/11 11:57 PM
5

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/06/10 09:26 PM
5

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/08/11 02:42 AM
5

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/12/12 10:42 PM
5

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/11/11 08:27 PM
5

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/10/14 08:44 PM
5

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/09/16 07:35 PM
5

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights11/03/14 12:30 PM
5

re: FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights19/11/14 03:07 PM
5

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/09/11 02:44 PM
5

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights31/08/09 10:10 AM
5

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/12/10 03:22 AM
5

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights14/11/13 01:05 PM
5

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/08/11 07:47 PM
5

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/02/10 08:39 PM
4

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/02/12 01:14 AM
4

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/10/14 04:10 PM
4

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/11/11 02:44 AM
4

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/02/12 07:33 PM
4

False AccusationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/11/16 08:56 PM
4

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/07/11 07:48 PM
4

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights01/05/12 12:45 PM
4

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/12/11 12:28 AM
4

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/02/11 12:40 PM
4

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/02/12 12:17 PM
4

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights27/11/13 07:54 PM
3

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/11/11 02:02 AM
3

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/01/11 02:17 AM
3

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/02/11 02:13 PM
3

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights12/12/14 12:58 PM
3

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights21/02/10 06:56 PM
3

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/08/11 01:57 AM
3

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/10/11 11:33 AM
3

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/03/12 10:04 PM
3

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/01/11 03:25 PM
3

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/05/11 06:22 PM
3

False AccusationsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/12/14 11:53 AM
3

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/08/13 06:34 PM
3

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights22/02/11 05:34 PM
3

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/01/11 05:06 PM
3

False AccusationsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights09/04/15 08:49 PM
3

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/03/11 12:43 PM
2

re: FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/09/14 12:51 PM
2

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights17/11/09 05:35 PM
2

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights03/01/12 03:28 PM
2

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/12/14 02:18 PM
2

False AccusationsPierceHarlan/r/MensRights15/12/14 07:25 PM
2

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/04/10 01:33 PM
2

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/02/11 01:23 PM
2

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights20/11/14 06:00 PM
2

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights16/08/12 05:58 PM
2

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/08/10 09:59 PM
1

DiscriminationPierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/03/15 05:18 PM
1

re: FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights18/09/14 05:10 PM
1

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights10/09/09 12:55 AM
1

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/01/11 03:20 PM
1

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/01/19 01:33 PM
1

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights05/02/14 05:55 PM
1

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights21/07/11 04:41 PM
1

re: FeminismPierceHarlan/r/MensRights08/09/14 09:10 PM
1

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights24/07/12 05:34 PM
1

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/08/09 01:09 AM
1

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights25/01/11 01:05 PM
1

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/08/09 04:33 PM
1

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/08/09 01:59 AM
0

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights04/01/12 01:08 PM
0

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights29/04/11 01:47 PM
0

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights23/09/15 01:14 PM
0

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights30/10/09 05:08 PM
0

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights13/07/09 05:54 PM
0

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights02/12/12 02:21 PM
0

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/07/09 01:35 PM
0

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights06/07/09 04:35 PM
0

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights07/02/11 04:24 PM
0

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights28/08/09 02:23 PM
0

PierceHarlan/r/MensRights20/04/09 04:21 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 4,249 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

It just goes to show that these "disciplines" are nonsense--to suggest they are worthy of serious study is just silly. Only in the strange world of the academy are these things treated with respectability.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 06:01 PM
1

The stupidity of this writer is breathtaking.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 07:05 PM
0

As I said, it depends on the issue. The Democratic Party self-identifies as liberal, something the GOP doesn't do. The Democratic Party is beholden to the lunatic fringe of the feminist movement.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 05:24 PM
1

Depends on the issue. Sadly, the Democratic Party is staunchly behind issues associated with radical feminism.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 04:59 PM
-1

Or for calling her male co-host "psycho"? Trump is equal opportunity nasty. The only people who squeal "sexist" when Trump lashes out at his enemies are the loons on the far left.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:42 PM
1

I lean right. On this one issue, I am neutral. I attack the left constantly at my site because they deserve to be attacked on this issue.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 10:26 PM
2

My blog has, for many years, highlighted the left's unfortunate tendency to treat young men accused of rape as rapists. I will not give the right a free pass when they do it. It's wrong whenever it's done.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 08:27 PM
1

Your comment is bizarre. The issue is not whether some illegal immigrants rape, the issue is the same old rush-to-judgment impulse that we find across the political spectrum. It's usually the left that rushes to judgment, but I'm not giving the right a pass when they do it, sorry.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 08:25 PM
1

Yeah, see, I kind of knew it wasn't a spoof.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 06:05 PM
1

This is a spoof, right?
/r/MensRights28/03/17 08:11 PM
2

https://www.amazon.com/Until-Proven-Innocent-Correctness-Injustices-ebook/dp/B001FA0SPG/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1482155554&sr=8-1&keywords=kc+jOHNSON+dUKE
/r/MensRights19/12/16 01:52 PM
1

THIS WAS THE MISSING PIECE!!! Will send you what I plan to post tomorrow.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 01:48 PM
9

I love how these people justify their discrimination: “ZSL London Zoo’s BedBUGS sleepover events were launched in 2010 and the guidelines put in place at the time were in line with similar policies at other large organisations." Imagine if a male defended sexist conduct by claiming "I just did what everyone else did."
/r/MensRights17/11/16 08:50 PM
2

I agree. I can't imagine that happening given that there is a witch hunt on campus--the targets (young men) don't know they are the witches. A lot of us have been ringing the fire alarm for years--I've written hundreds of posts at COTWA about it, yet young college men continue to vote for their oppressors and don't protest the injustices when one of their own is wrongly expelled. Without grassroots support, major change ain't going to happen.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 11:12 PM
1

Amazing--how many downvotes this story is getting. We must have an untold number of trolls here.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 11:02 PM
1

Good points. Prior to "Dear Colleague," schools could pick any standard they chose. If the "Dear Colleague" letter is rescinded, I fear that it would be very difficult for a lot of schools that formerly used a "clear and convincing" standard to go back--the gender zealots on campus would have a monumental hissy fit and try to bring down any college prez who tried to do that. We need the Trump administration to affirmatively institute due process protections for the accused, not just leave it up …
/r/MensRights16/11/16 09:44 PM
1

When this guy is concerned, that's great news: https://www.buzzfeed.com/tylerkingkade/trump-campus-rape-title-ix?utm_term=.juWZ5JQ38V#.qxVPYyWwmN
/r/MensRights16/11/16 09:14 PM
0

Oh, my. Not even sure if you are serious. The "wall" is intended to control illegal immigration.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 06:12 PM
1

Tax cuts for small businesspersons is what drove the JFK and Reagan economies.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 06:11 PM
1

And this: http://www.cotwa.info/2016/11/the-ball-less-wonders-on-campus.html
/r/MensRights16/11/16 05:33 PM
2

Right. Did you see this post of mine? http://www.cotwa.info/2016/11/the-ball-less-wonders-on-campus.html
/r/MensRights16/11/16 05:33 PM
0

http://www.cotwa.info/2016/11/the-ball-less-wonders-on-campus.html
/r/MensRights16/11/16 05:32 PM
1

http://www.cotwa.info/2016/11/the-ball-less-wonders-on-campus.html
/r/MensRights16/11/16 05:32 PM
-1

Do you not believe in enforcing the law? Has the law been adequately enforced to date? Wow.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 05:32 PM
1

". . . the only reason to vote GOP remains evil or stupidity." What an idiotic thing to wrote. Read my post here and trhttp://www.cotwa.info/2016/11/the-ball-less-wonders-on-campus.html
/r/MensRights16/11/16 05:31 PM
0

Really? http://www.cotwa.info/2016/11/the-ball-less-wonders-on-campus.html
/r/MensRights16/11/16 05:29 PM
3

Great job.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 01:05 PM
2

You would do well to spend a few months reading through my site--we've posted literally hundreds of stories about the witch hunt on campus predating the infamous "Dear Colleague" letter in April 2011: http://www.cotwa.info/ Start here: http://www.cotwa.info/2015/06/the-campus-rape-war-is-over-and-boys.html
/r/MensRights14/11/16 05:33 PM
2

Say. What.?
/r/MensRights14/11/16 05:25 PM
0

They need to protest the right things. The Democrat Party's hostility to the rights of college men is blatant--that's what these dopes ought to be protesting.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 05:25 PM
1

Your comment is what's "strange." It's the quintessential men's rights issue--college campuses, under the thumb of the Obama Dept. of Education, have manifested unprecedented hostility to the rights of college men over the past several years. Foolish college men have no concern that there is a witch hunt going on--and that they are the witches.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 05:22 PM
1

Yeah, because entitled college students are similar to the founding fathers.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 05:11 PM
1

It is the go-to rhetoric of college students and feminists who are held to no standards. If an outcome doesn't go your way--blame it on sexism or racism. The working people of America have had enough of their moral superiors on the left lecturing everyone about how evil they are just because Democracy doesn't always give them exactly what they want.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 04:10 AM
10

Amen. The rhetoric of dopey college students and feminists.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 04:06 AM
7

Must be nice to just say anything without having to support it with silly things like evidence. If the kooky far left hates an outcome, they attribute it to racism or sexism. OF course, serious people who have to account for the things they say and write can't get away with it--this sort of license is reserved for dopey college students and feminists of all ages.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 04:05 AM
2

I was being sarcastic. I liked the fact she conceded.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 11:24 PM
2

Exactly right. But they parrot the far left talking points, and those talking points would have everyone believe the GOP sat there saying "no" for 8 years.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 06:56 PM
0

Far left partisans like you are not worthy of debate--you folks are flat-out nuts. I enjoyed Hillary's concession speech.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 06:26 PM
5

No evidence Trump is a misandrist.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 03:36 PM
6

Seriously? When have you heard Trump chortle about a "basket of deplorables" who are "irredeemable"? And by the way, Hillary's enlightened supporters laughed and applauded that line. There is no equivalence here. We've had 8 years of an incredibly divisive leader--who sold his signature achievement, the as-it-turns-out Unaffordable Care Act--by repeating something that wasn't factual and by rejecting the very measures that Trump has indicated he would employ to fix it (e.g., competition between …
/r/MensRights09/11/16 03:35 PM
2

Your comment is misguided, parroting talking points from the misguided far left. You would do well to actually read my post. And as someone who actually follows this stuff very closely--as opposed to taking cues from the Huff Post that said Clinton was going to win 323 electoral votes--Trump's animating impulse in this race was none of the things you think. It was trade, trade, and trade--and on that, he was closer to Bernie than Cruz or Obama. "Anti-secular"? Seriously? Because he wants to appo…
/r/MensRights09/11/16 03:31 PM
1

Rolling Stone publisher suggested magazine's mistake in automatically believing rape accuser was unavoidable: http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2016/10/rolling-stone-publisher-suggested.html
/r/MensRights31/10/16 01:33 PM
3

Yes!
/r/MensRights13/10/16 12:35 AM
2

Well put!
/r/MensRights12/10/16 10:15 PM
2

Right. But college administrators seem to think they should "comfort" the accuser by expelling, and tarnishing forever, the accused--fair proceeding be damned.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 07:35 PM
9

The FBI has made no such claim. DNA is not pertinent to he said/she said college sex where the guy claims it was consensual but the woman insists it wasn't. Of the rape claims that can be definitively classified, false claims actually are more common than actual rapes. http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/even-if-false-rape-reports-are-rare-they-shouldnt-be-ignored/article/2568250
/r/MensRights12/10/16 07:33 PM
1

If someone tells you they were falsely accused of rape, would you likewise believe them?
/r/MensRights12/10/16 05:56 PM
10

Exactly. The entire sexual grievance litany of statistics is based on crediting every assertion made to a pollster as rape--even when those same pollsters report that a shockingly significant percentage of young women think consent is rape: http://www.cotwa.info/2015/09/the-real-college-rape-culture-young.html
/r/MensRights12/10/16 02:54 PM
1

Yes, she's irrational and controlling. It would be a mistake to ignore this very significant red flag--you'd be asking for a lifetime of such behavior, and not just about your penis.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 02:50 PM
4

Wonderful.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 02:38 PM
4

Thanks very much!
/r/MensRights12/10/16 02:38 PM
1

Hero.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 02:05 PM
5

After boys and girls go out into the real world, despite all the calls for workplace equality for men and women, there are no calls for equality with respect to workplace fatalities for men and women. Still, 92 percent of workplace fatalities in the U.S. occur to males. Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities: Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries (CFOI),” 2014, http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshcfoi1.htm
/r/MensRights05/10/16 11:55 AM
1

Whatever his motivations for parroting the language of the sexual grievance industry, he has done the wrongly accused a disservice by beating the rape culture drum. A lot of young men are suffering because of attitudes like Nate Parker's, and he would do well to make amends by talking about due process instead of toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 07:48 PM
1

In both cases, cultural norms, dictated by religious beliefs, prompted the requests.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 11:57 AM
2

The new law doesn't say what the headline here says. The act does not change the substantive crime of rape--it doesn't make intoxicated sex illegal, it imposes a mandatory sentence for rape that's already on the books. The real question is: since when do liberals (the sexual grievance industry is liberal) insist on mandatory sentences? Answer: when the target of their sentences is young men.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 11:54 AM
5

Did you read my article about him in COTWA? He is being "stung up by a mob" that he's part of. Even now he supports the culture that is causing his distress--and the distress of a lot of other young men. If Nate Parker is being unfairly maligned, he's the architect of his own misery. It is very difficult to help people fight tyranny when they are part of it. http://www.cotwa.info/2016/09/nate-parker-preserves-his-pc.html
/r/MensRights04/10/16 11:35 AM
4

This is typical of the sexual grievance industry's effort to reconstruct masculinity. When we mock the caricature of the "man-hating" feminist, the truth is, it isn't far from the truth. If these folks detest with every fiber of their beings the "masculinity" that is part and parcel of most Western males, then how can anyone argue with a straight face that they don't hate men?
/r/MensRights03/10/16 10:21 PM
13

Not a fan: http://www.cotwa.info/2016/09/nate-parker-preserves-his-pc.html
/r/MensRights03/10/16 07:40 PM
7

Indeed. These zealous Brown students honestly think they are doing something good--they honestly think that people who speak out in favor of rights for the accused enable rape by propping up a dysfunctional masculinity. They honestly think that they know better than federal judges, much less the multitudes of law professors across America who counsel that the pendulum has swung too far and that the rights of the accused are in jeopardy. One of the signs of maturity is to appreciate you may not h…
/r/MensRights03/10/16 02:10 PM
16

Without knowing anything about the cases, here's my guess. The woman was experiencing confusion and emotional problems that caused her to act out in an inappropriate manner, but the boy probably was the real predator anyway, so she is almost as much a victim as he is. In the other case, the man had no emotional confusion--he acted with a clear head and a maligned heart as he used his male privilege to sexually gratify himself. This sort of thinking accounts for the sentencing disparity based on …
/r/MensRights28/09/16 06:33 PM
5

These people are literally insane--talk about a basket of deplorables that are irredeemable.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 05:57 PM
2

I've written about it.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:18 PM
1

Since someone has made the accusation--even though we know nothing about the accuser (and don't even know his or her real name) and have no details about the alleged rape and haven't asked Ms. Allred for an alibi or considered evidence that might show she's innocent--of course she's guilty.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 11:44 AM
1

It's an issue that the ACLU, defense attorneys, and anyone concerned about justice cares about. The SOL differs from state to state, and most states have lengthy statutes of limitations for rape. To have NO statute of limitations is unjust and is the product of a sexual grievance industry's witch hunt.
/r/MensRights14/09/16 07:40 PM
1

tldr your comment.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 10:42 AM
1

Fear of ISIS sounds like a good thing to me. Fear about something imaginary just to keep your party in power is not just dishonest, it is repulsive.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 04:51 PM
3

Unfortunately, sometimes we need to "take sides" on issues--on this issue, the "side" is clear. Other issues present other analyses. I, frankly, can't see the GOP of Bob Dole and other law and order types taking this position 20 years ago--it is a position promoted by the libertarian wing of the party that cares about the Constitution.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 08:34 PM
1

Note that Facebook did not remove the hate page that helped inspire a lunatic to kill five white police officers--that particular Facebook page is mentioned in this story: http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/11/us/dallas-shooting-investigation/ -- and I just checked, it was not removed despite being a part of the biggest story in America. In the Facebook world, something meets "community standards" only when it fits an extreme leftist narrative.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 08:42 PM
1

Ah, the enlightened left "teaching" intolerant Middle America not to be haters. Must be wonderful to be so enlightened.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 01:32 PM
1

You've ruined my day. Whoever you are.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 02:55 PM
1

I would have just sent readers to Ashe's column if that was the only link I was citing. But thanks for assuming the worst.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 02:55 PM
1

Sorry--corrected.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 02:10 PM
1

Exactly.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 12:56 PM

Here's the deal. They can't be separated. I'm not the one who injected politics into the issue I write about. The Bush administration hired Consad to do an independent study about the "wage gap." The result is a study that supports my conclusion. The Obama administration quickly removed it from their website and continually parrots the 77 cent idiocy. The Obama administration declared war on college men (the "dear colleague" letter), and its hostility to due process is off-the-charts. I've writt…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 04:30 PM
1

We wrote about this--more than three years ago. This is not news. http://www.cotwa.info/2013/02/woman-jailed-after-11-false-rape-claims.html
/r/MensRights21/03/16 11:21 PM
2

None. I'm an expert. http://www.cotwa.info/
/r/MensRights18/03/16 01:54 PM
1

This is my blog: http://www.cotwa.info/
/r/MensRights18/03/16 03:15 AM
3

Ugh! Read my blog--I have posted more on this subject than the rest of this board combined: http://www.cotwa.info/
/r/MensRights18/03/16 03:14 AM

What's sad is that the usual suspects from the sexual grievance cartel who monitor this board would be outraged that you dare equate this carnage with "real" male privilege--as if this has nothing to do with being born male. Or, they would blame war on toxic masculinity, which is beyond silly, and, in any event wouldn't justify the slaughter of innocents forced to be soldiers.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 10:08 PM

Doesn't sound accurate. It implies there's a side other than "dark."
/r/MensRights17/03/16 06:36 PM

I will spell it out. Fogle was given due process. He should not have been beaten on top of that, and we should not celebrate that beating. It's that simple. Ours is a culture that overreacts to rape in ways too numerous to chronicle. That overreaction has been institutionalized in certain respects--we've written extensively about that at COTWA. The only appropriate reaction to an allegation of rape--which lends itself to outrage more than any other crime except possibly murder--is with due proce…
/r/MensRights17/03/16 04:31 AM

Now I'm a liar. Goodnight, Pig.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 04:21 AM
2

Wow. That's good.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 04:21 AM

You would do well to argue better. Most of what you write is conclusory blather. Don't tell the reader what to think, show them. I'm educating you here, pig. You should pay me tuition. Now seriously, stop trolling here with your mindless blather.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 04:20 AM
1

Amen! That's an excellent point.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 04:18 AM

Yes, yes, yes. "Proven," he bleats. With no evidence beyond his angry ipse dixit. Nothing is more daunting than the righteous indignation of a pig.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 04:16 AM

Okay, okay, okay--BREATHE, Mr. Pig. BREATHE! Let's agree to disagree. Life is too short for further useless attempts to communicate with you.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 04:06 AM

Mr. Pigman, I have written thousands of words in response on this subject, here and in another thread. Nothing I say changes your mind--although wilyame and I now have a shared understanding--because he was happy to engage in a civil discussion. See here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4apk7l/nitwits_think_its_justice_when_a_prisoner_beats_a/ You, on the other hand, are just happy to label me as an evil dumbbell, so you can imagine how eager I am to continue a dialogue under those …
/r/MensRights17/03/16 04:05 AM

I don't have a monopoly on the truth, and I have been known to be wrong. But "dishonesty"? I like to call it advocacy. This is a very, very serious issue--and to accept vigilante justice because we think it's appropriate in a given case sends us down a slippery slope that is as wrong as can be. It's that simple.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 03:58 AM
2

It takes me a few times to explain things properly, so if you overreacted, I probably contributed to that. I really appreciate your contribution here--you helped me to focus my position, so thank you.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 03:44 AM
3

Excellent.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 03:37 AM

As noted above, he was given due process for the sentence that was imposed on him. That sentence did not include being badly beaten while in the state's custody, as much as the vigilante lovers might think that's all part and parcel of being a convicted rapist.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 03:36 AM
2

Amen, brother!
/r/MensRights17/03/16 03:35 AM

Apology accepted. I understand your point, and there is certainly some truth to it. But we live in a culture that celebrates violence committed on men accused and convicted of rape, and our law enforcement system has, for too long, tolerated it. I would argue it's become institutionalized. This particular event happened in prison, and there's too much "looking the other way" by guards who are happy to mete out their own "justice." Fogle was sentence to a prison term pursuant to principles of due…
/r/MensRights17/03/16 03:34 AM

Breathe, Mr. Piggie--breathe! Now count to ten. Yep. Great argument. The Constitution and due process stink because of . . . wait for it . . . slavery! Yea! You've done it! You've exposed the patriarchy! By the way, you will wait for additional evidence until hell freezes over. Normal people don't go brutally beating other people. If you think they do, maybe you need to be watched in isolation, too.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 03:18 AM

Thanks for calling me a "fucking moron." I am accustomed to that from you folks--some other radical feminists have called for me to brutally raped.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 03:14 AM
3

I spend a lot of time working to promote due process. I don't waste my time on little boys who call me "an abhorrent human being."
/r/MensRights17/03/16 03:11 AM

"Conflating" -- you're even writing like a radical feminist with a stick up her ass. No, I'm for real, piggie. And so is the United States Constitution.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 03:09 AM

You sound like there's something else wrong in your life. Maybe you should see a therapist. Get it straight, Morton Downey, Jr., we all hate child rapists. What separates the men from the radical feminists is that the men respect due process. This scum got his sentence, and sorry that your bloodlust wasn't part of it.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 03:08 AM

Well, the bloodthirsty section of the peanut gallery has made its voice heard. "I'm opposed to child rape! Rah! Rah Rah!" And Lady Justice weeps. EDIT: READ MY POST ABOVE. THE QUESTION ISN'T ABOUT HIS GUILT OR INNOCENCE. IT'S ABOUT DUE PROCESS.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 03:06 AM

No, madam or sir, I am not "talking out of my ass" here. I respect due process, you don't. You can't pick and choose when to respect due process and when to ignore it. You sound worse than the radical feminists.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 02:55 AM

No, there's something wrong with you if you are okay with having a sociopath felon unilaterally deciding to inflict his own sentence on fellow convicts. You're no better than the feminists, Piggie.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 02:52 AM

And he received a sentence established by a judge, not by a sociopath felon. You don't think due process applies to the sentencing phase? Now who's being ridiculous. I didn't receive an answer to my question, Mr. Pigman. You'd have been happy if Brian Banks or some other innocent man who pled guilty to child sex crimes got a good beating behind bars?
/r/MensRights17/03/16 02:06 AM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4apk7l/nitwits_think_its_justice_when_a_prisoner_beats_a/d12rzmb
/r/MensRights17/03/16 02:02 AM

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4apk7l/nitwits_think_its_justice_when_a_prisoner_beats_a/d12rzmb
/r/MensRights17/03/16 02:01 AM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4apk7l/nitwits_think_its_justice_when_a_prisoner_beats_a/d12rzmb
/r/MensRights17/03/16 02:01 AM

You know how I you can tell if someone truly respects due process and isn't just paying it lip service? When they support it even though it seems to benefit scum, people for whom we have no sympathy. It's easy to support due process when we know the person it benefits is innocent--even the feminists would do that. But vigilante "justice" isn't justice, no matter how much we all hate child rape. And yes, dear readers, due process applies even to the sentencing phase of the case. Here, the man who…
/r/MensRights17/03/16 01:59 AM
1

Yeah.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 01:50 AM

Look, I understand elections elicit emotional responses that often can't be explained with rationality. You have a very unique view of the world that, to put it charitably, isn't shared by serious people. I have written an incredible number of words to respond to you, to no avail. I see no need to address you any further, and suggest you study up on the issues. One important point that serious readers might have misunderstood from my posts: I am not saying that "Republican isn't part of the prob…
/r/MensRights17/03/16 12:44 AM
3

Not sure what to make of your comment. I have a difficult time wrapping my head around the fact that someone as articulate as you doesn't know Cruz is anti-establishment. That's like asking whether water is wet. Cruz's anti-establishment credentials are positively notorious. Google it. Listen to Limbaugh and Levin--http://www.worldtribune.com/anti-establishment-is-in-limbaugh-and-levin-back-cruz-paglia-warms-to-trump/ or Hannity and Beck. That's all they talk about when they mention Cruz. Watch …
/r/MensRights16/03/16 09:43 PM
4

Cruz is not an "establishment" Republican--the establishment hates him worse than Donald Trump because he is an honest-to-goodness Constitutional conservative. Bob Dole, one of the architects of VAWA, can't stand him. Former House Speaker John Boehner today called him "Lucifer" (he'd previously called Cruz a "jackass"). John McCain called him a "wacko bird" and can't stand him. The Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell can't stand him. Pres. George W. Bush said he doesn't like him. Cruz does no…
/r/MensRights16/03/16 08:43 PM
5

I write Community of the Wrongly Accused and can't speak for MRAs--I can speak only about the issues I write about. The Obama administration has evinced off-the-charts hostility to due process for college men accused of serious sex offenses. I've written literally hundreds of posts about it. When it comes to politicians, no, they're not "all the same"--as bad as the previous administration was on a lot of issues, it did not wage war on our sons in college. The current administration is in a diff…
/r/MensRights16/03/16 08:23 PM
1

The Washington law was for criminal matters. These laws are for college disciplinary hearings.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 11:01 AM
6

Excellent.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 08:43 PM
6

http://www.vox.com/2014/10/13/6966847/yes-means-yes-is-a-terrible-bill-and-i-completely-support-it
/r/MensRights15/03/16 08:32 PM
0

I point out facts and let the readers decide for themselves. Hillary Clinton has said things that reveal she's no friend of the wrongly accused. The Obama administration has done some terrible things when it comes to college men. If standing up for due process is "extremism," then I'm all for it. Few people outside the radical feminist left would agree with your criticism, such as it is. It is well to note that you have not addressed the substance of my post--because you can't. You likely just w…
/r/MensRights12/03/16 06:00 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYIinBKejnM
/r/MensRights07/03/16 10:11 PM
3

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/07/what-bernie-sanders-still-doesnt-get-about-interrupting-hillary-clinton/ Time to go bang my head against the wall. These people need to grow up.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 09:44 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/488a6y/during_his_oscar_presentation_joe_biden_made_it_a/d0idkbz
/r/MensRights29/02/16 07:18 PM
2

Yes, it is good to recognize that rape affects men and women, but . . . Biden's speech, the "It's on us" campaign, and the Obama administration's draconian approach to campus sexual assault is premised on a non-existent "rape culture" that has done tremendous harm to men on campus--and men alone; specifically, the men my blog (COTWA) gives voice to. So in an isolated context, his acknowledgement was good, but I take no solace in his appearance at the Oscars last night.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 07:17 PM
3

Put a crappy statue in a New York museum that insults traditional American religious of other values and the critics hail it. Put up a snow penis that offends feminists and it's not art, it's misogyny.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 07:04 PM
2

Excellent point.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 10:53 PM
5

Thanks for the correction about the statute. In fact, the encounter with the father is the epitome of "unconventional." That's not a bias, it's a definition. But it was also incest. If you'd like my take on the depravity of the encounter, you would understand that I'm to the right of Ted Cruz on such matters. What I know is that this very pro-woman DA did not find rape--at least rape he can prove--and further speculation from me won't advance anything. I understand that most people probably woul…
/r/MensRights26/02/16 10:21 PM
5

You tell me!
/r/MensRights26/02/16 09:26 PM
8

I am not certain what part of Tiqr's comment you appreciate. The point of my post is this: in the discussion yesterday on another thread, Tiqr seemed to assume that the accuser did not act consensually because of the bizarre circumstances of the encounter. My point was simply that Tiqr seemed more willing to assume that five boys--FIVE--did the most heinous thing imaginable to a woman short of murder than to assume that a woman would willingly take part in a very bizarre and, by most standards, …
/r/MensRights26/02/16 09:03 PM
19

"I wasn't speaking in favour of any side of this debate." With all due respect, the plain words of your comment suggested that you had made an assumption, and one that I found troubling. True, you asked me if I had any other information that might disabuse you of your assumption, but that doesn't change anything. You looked at the same set of facts I had available to me and indicated that your "instincts" told you that the boys "[took] advantage of the situation" and, you asked rhetorically, "ho…
/r/MensRights26/02/16 05:25 PM
3

. . . and she might have been a Martian. We don't need to invent facts here. We have enough injustice without making up more.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 12:02 PM
4

I have been writing about these issues for a long time, and, yes, there is an anti-male knee-jerk reaction to these issues, as we've shown time and time again.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 12:01 PM
3

I don't have to agree with the law to expect that it be uniformly enforced regardless of the gender of the assailant.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 11:58 AM
10

Sex with a parent is incest, not rape. It is possible she initiated it; it is quite possible they were both drunk or high, but not incapacitated. It is curious that there is a knee jerk reaction to assume that every act of unconventional, indeed nutty, sex--whether it is group sex or even incest--must have been initiated by the males involved, and that it must have been against the will of the female.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 10:39 PM
5

There are plenty of cases where recantations are not accepted, and for good reason. A DA has to be very certain that the recantation is valid. This particular district attorney is a self-promoting crusader for women who does not strike me as someone who would accept a recantation of a woman with a learning disability or who was incapacitated. I have no doubt that drugs or alcohol were involved, but intoxicated is not incapacitated, as Brett Sokolow always reminds people. This case is similar to …
/r/MensRights25/02/16 10:33 PM
7

As nuts as it sounds to us, maybe it was consensual.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 10:18 PM
15

Minor is generally tried as an adult when the minor rapes. Here the minors did not rape--the woman recanted her rape claim. The minors were not rapists but victims of statutory rape.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 08:24 PM
27

Minors can commit rape, of course. But in too many cases that I've seen, minors are falsely accused accused of rape by adult women--which means the minors were twice victimized: as statutory rape victims and as the victims of false rape claims.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 07:47 PM
7

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/brooklyn/nypd-fire-slow-response-rape-report-brooklyn-article-1.2491590
/r/MensRights25/02/16 06:22 PM
40

By the way, when the New York Daily News first reported the story, it called the boys "fiends" and the woman the "victim." "Fiends." Nice, don't you think?
/r/MensRights25/02/16 05:37 PM
2

The "true believer" conservatives who have been largely kind to Trump since he got in the race--Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, etc--think Cruz is the real deal. Limbaugh has said repeatedly that Cruz is the closest thing we will ever have in our lifetimes to Ronald Reagan. Cruz's evangelical roots and tent-revival preacher demeanor, and his scorched earth policy in refusing to do "deals" in Congress (engage in pork barrel politics) has made him a pariah even in the GOP among secular, establishment c…
/r/MensRights22/02/16 03:32 AM
1

I purposefully avoided agreeing with the Guardian's characterization that Trump had unfairly targeted these young men, and if that wasn't clear, that was my failing. My first reaction was that The Guardian may have been unfair to Mr. Trump--his ad is couched in general language, but my limited information does not allow me to state definitively that he wasn't referencing these young men. Trump does mention someone talking about understanding the young men's anger--that may, or may not, be a dire…
/r/MensRights20/02/16 02:17 AM
1

Given the photo and the poem, she ought to be institutionalized.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 02:58 PM
1

Amen, brother!
/r/MensRights10/02/16 04:22 AM
0

You would do well to take a basic writing class to help you express whatever on earth might be swirling around in your head.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 04:22 AM
0

You clearly are not schooled on the issues. If it wasn't such a waste of time, I'd be happy to debate you. Back under your bridge, troll!
/r/MensRights10/02/16 12:55 AM
4

They don't want the cases that end up with convictions. They want to tell stories of average college women assaulted by male friends--their narrative is that rape is "normalized," that masculinity itself is in need of fixing, and to further this narrative, they need rapists who are normal guys dating/friendly with the "victim."
/r/MensRights09/02/16 09:41 PM
3

"The uploader has not made this video available in your country."
/r/MensRights09/02/16 01:10 PM
11

Yeah. You'd think he's Jack the Ripper if you listen to these feminists.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 09:30 PM
9

I point out in the post that only the parties know for certain what happened. You seem to miss the point of the post: it is unfair to convict a presumptively innocent man in the court of public opinion and in the process deny him the right to an education--that's the problem this post addressed, the rush to judgment that has hurt so many wrongly accused men. When someone is accused of a serious crime, he is presumed innocent--and that can't be just a hollow mantra, it is something Americans have…
/r/MensRights20/01/16 09:28 PM
1

Ted Cruz is likely the only candidate who won't pander to women's groups in a meaningful way. He's the real deal.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 03:36 AM
2

You sure did. We did a 180 after Sen. Rubio explained himself--no candidate has come out stronger for the wrongly accused on campus.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 03:35 AM
-2

Sanders is an un-electable comic book who was pandering to women and who thought that getting real tough on rape meant referring all rape cases to police. He thinks college rape is an epidemic. His corporate tax rate will send every major company overseas--the loss of jobs would be epic.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 03:32 AM
2

That's your right. For the issue I write about, no candidate has come out stronger.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 03:31 AM
2

No.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 03:30 AM
3

Yes. Rubio responded to his critics a few days later, and came out stronger for the presumptively innocent than any other candidate.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 03:30 AM
7

Huff Post is a prisoner of far left group identity politics--its reporting on college sexual assault is an atrocity.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 12:53 AM
2

HA!
/r/MensRights14/01/16 06:20 PM
7

Thanks, but no need for name calling. S/he is allowed to disagree with one of my posts--an incredible number of people seem to disagree with her/him based on the upvotes.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 05:32 PM
4

Pres. Firefly, how are Chicolini and Pinky? Upvoted for the name alone.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 05:31 PM
23

As someone who follows the issue very closely for COTWA, I am not at all surprised by the allegation. The fact that it doesn't happen at your school is good for your students, but bad things are happening to male students at schools all over the country.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 01:59 PM
1

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/01/john-mccain-sexual-harassment_n_3507040.html
/r/MensRights13/01/16 09:27 PM
0

Yes, the post discusses that at the end.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 03:55 PM
5

Feminism has been co-opted by charlatans, loons, and liars. Anyone who subscribes to it with their eyes opened is one of those.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 11:48 AM
6

I agree, but not for the same reasons. Ours is a country that thinks it's rape when a woman has consensual sex after a man has nagged her for it (see https://www.ncherm.org/documents/MODELSEXUALMISCONDUCTPOLICY1-10.pdf here page 9). I can just imagine how America would react if our women met up with people from a society with REAL rape culture.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 05:25 PM
2

http://www.cotwa.info/2015/10/when-nude-photos-of-female-celebrities.html
/r/MensRights01/01/16 06:24 PM
1

Cherry pick--but not like David Futrelle does, right?
/r/MensRights01/01/16 06:21 PM
7

The Comins' quote excerpted is a characterization of what she said by Time Magazine--here is an excerpt from the actual article, which is scarier than the snippet referenced above: Catherine Comins, assistant dean of student life at Vassar, also sees some value in this loose use of "rape." She says angry victims of various forms of sexual intimidation cry rape to regain their sense of power. "To use the word carefully would be to be careful for the sake of the violator, and the survivors don't c…
/r/MensRights01/01/16 06:20 PM
6

Southern Poverty Law Center is an extremist group that was long ago coopted by PC loons and enablers.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 06:14 PM
1

DV does not need to occur in the home. I know what attempted murder is. We generally capitalize the first letter in sentences.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 05:17 PM
12

When a girl does it to a boy, it's a "relationship dispute." When the genders are reversed, it's "domestic violence" and "attempted murder."
/r/MensRights15/12/15 08:54 PM
13

In fairness to Fox News, I have heard various reports on their shows the past few years about the hostility to due process on our college campuses. I do not recall hearing a report that stripping college men of their rights is a good thing just because they've been accused of sexual assault. On this issue, no other news outlet comes close to being fair.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 04:38 PM
2

There's no video on line yet, to my knowledge.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 04:35 PM
3

Yes, yes, yes--you probably know that I write about that sort of thing a lot, and I agree with you 100 percent. But that's not what this writer is talking about--this writer is talking about something that's going to be used to hurt innocent men.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 09:24 PM
3

Right. But, here, the writer clearly meant to suggest that the population of college rapists is much wider than what Lisak insisted.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 08:38 PM
5

Maybe Dick ought to ask Wanetta Gibson--http://www.cotwa.info/2012/06/bygones-be-bygones-unspeakable.html or Danmell Ndonye--http://www.cotwa.info/p/lambs-to-slaughter-hofstra-false-rape.html or Crystal Gail Mangum--http://durhamwonderland.blogspot.com/ or any of the innumerable other women I could point him to.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 02:09 PM
3

And that's what I wrote. For once I got something right.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 04:00 PM
2

Wish I had said that.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 11:03 PM
3

Excellent point.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 06:47 PM
1

Love it!
/r/MensRights11/11/15 09:42 PM
11

This nation has a shameful history of treating rape as so heinous an offense that too many people don't even regard innocence as a defense. http://www.cotwa.info/2010/05/feminists-tap-into-america-tradition-of.html
/r/MensRights09/11/15 01:07 AM
2

Ha! Nice!
/r/MensRights04/11/15 11:17 PM
2

Better lawyer-up, Dave.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 07:34 PM
1

Wonderful!! I am now a French's fan.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 06:19 PM
3

Excellent points.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 11:30 PM
8

College kangaroo sex courts use the same standard of proof as civil cases, the preponderance of the evidence standard. The problem is, colleges afford men accused of sex offenses essentially none of the protections provided to the defendant in civil proceedings. In civil cases, defendants are allowed to be fully represented by counsel at every stage of the proceeding. They are permitted to vigorously depose prior to trial, and vigorously cross-examine during trial, the accuser and any other pert…
/r/MensRights03/11/15 08:18 PM
5

Better get back to class. Recess is over. Stop trolling.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 03:45 PM
15

In fact, a much-touted new survey on college sexual assault reveals that it's women who don't understand: http://www.cotwa.info/2015/10/what-hell-is-wrong-with-todays-college.html
/r/MensRights03/11/15 02:18 PM
1

Fauxcahontas!
/r/MensRights02/11/15 10:23 PM
3

Your point is excellent about the eight percent. But Miltenberg himself disappoints. Here's an actual quote: “I don’t think that we’re taking a position that’s that different from the various women’s groups that are complaining about the process.” I am not sure what women's groups he's referring to--the ones clamoring for fair processes for men, or to support the Safe Campus Act? Really, Andrew? Which women's groups are those? Seriously. I wish that were true, but I can see no evidence of it.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 03:34 PM
3

I think that league is for boys under 17--they lost to 16-year-olds?
/r/MensRights28/10/15 10:33 PM
25

You are sexist for even pointing this out. Hell, my blog got put on a hate list by the Southern Poverty whatever the hell it is, and this is the only post they singled out: http://www.cotwa.info/2012/01/off-topic-takes-woman-to-get-things-done.html
/r/MensRights28/10/15 01:49 PM
2

Excuse me while I go bang my head against the wall. Too, too stupid. The world is brimming with injustice, and feminists rail against made-up sexism. They can find oppression in almost anything, can't they? Other examples: http://www.cotwa.info/2013/02/a-tale-of-two-snow-penises-and-two-very.html and http://www.cotwa.info/2014/04/and-now-word-from-chronically-offended.html
/r/MensRights28/10/15 01:45 PM
1

"Dismissing black Women [sic]"? Thanks for mischaracterizing my post. But at least you are up front about your bigotry, even though the premise for it is deranged. Let's just hope you are locked away in a secure place where you can't hurt anyone.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 05:11 PM
7

Absolutely correct.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 05:24 PM
6

Right--"rape" in quotation marks.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 03:55 PM
27

Right. Rape is "normalized to the point where men who are otherwise decent guys will rape and not even think that it's wrong. And that's what terrifies me."--Jessica Valenti http://feministing.com/2006/04/18/women_should_know_better_than/
/r/MensRights22/10/15 02:59 PM
3

Par for the course for sites that rant and rave about misogyny--an example from earlier this week: http://www.cotwa.info/2015/10/when-nude-photos-of-female-celebrities.html
/r/MensRights21/10/15 10:24 PM
2

I sincerely hope that doesn't happen.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 08:25 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3phxbz/why_isnt_amazon_taken_to_task_for_selling_this/cw6shxg
/r/MensRights21/10/15 11:54 AM
3

For those who think this doesn't matter and that only whiny feminists complain about things, I can say that this shirt doesn't affect me one bit. But, you see, I'm not an impressionable child, and this is not an isolated incident--it's part of the culture of misandry in which we live. When our sons and daughters are continually bombarded with messages that demonize men and boys, that mock them, that treat them as if they are natural born predators, and that reduce them to vile caricature, do we …
/r/MensRights20/10/15 08:20 PM
3

Well, maybe we ought to start to care, just a little, about some of these things. No, it doesn't affect me one bit, but I'm not an impressionable child. When our sons and daughters are continually bombarded with messages that demonize men and boys, that mock them, treat them as natural born predators, and reduce them to vile caricature, do we really think it has no effect on them? At what point do the strong, stoic, "I don't care about anything" men moved to finally stand up and say, "You know w…
/r/MensRights20/10/15 08:11 PM
3

In the United States of America, I can do whatever I want within the confines of the law.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 06:27 PM
6

Consumers are allowed to dislike a product and they are allowed to tell the supplier that they dislike it-- for any reason. Maybe they don't like the color, or the fit, or the fabric. Or maybe they don't like the message on it. If the supplier responds to consumers by pulling the product, that's not censorship--it's called the free market at work. We need to stop throwing buzzwords around so loosely and taking the moral high ground when it's not appropriate.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 03:20 PM
5

Good point. "Rape" is not a "relationship."
/r/MensRights19/10/15 07:41 PM
2

I am sorry, but your comment is completely lost on me. First, I am not a "men's rights" advocate per se. I write a blog that deals almost exclusively with one narrow subject--and on that subject, I might add, I have taken a position less severe than some of the most respected law professors in America--almost of them are liberals and, yes, they are taken pretty seriously. Second, I haven't been called "dude" since long before I was in law school, decades ago. Third, your reaction is as puzzling …
/r/MensRights19/10/15 06:51 PM
2

The Fappening was simply the most extreme example of what the earlier Frisky article bemoaned. In both the Fappening and this case, we had pictures of people's naked bodies splashed across the Internet without their permission -- in Justin Bieber's case, he never posed for the pictures, they caught him unawares, which is creepy in itself. Yet we have some other readers on this thread insisting that the two are apples and oranges, because of legalities (in point of fact, Justin Bieber's legal tea…
/r/MensRights19/10/15 05:46 PM
12

Rape is actually defined by the criminal statutes--it's a crime, and that's where crimes are defined. And, for example, "pressuring in a non-physically threatening way" is not rape. It is technically called "sexual coercion" and only certain colleges and universities punish it. We've written about it extensively, and here is the problem with punishing it even at the college level: http://www.cotwa.info/2012/03/legal-infirmities-to-punishing-sexual.html In addition, there is no "rape culture," an…
/r/MensRights19/10/15 05:26 PM
13

Not sure what your point is, but this isn't about Justin Bieber (I have never heard even one of his songs), or about "men's rights" or about validation of any kind. It's about double standards in the on-line gynomedia, where a popular outlet can take sanctimonious offense to something when women are the victims but actually take part in the same act to victimize a man.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 04:38 PM
25

The "moral outrage" isn't about the pictures as much as it's about double standards. And it's only because outlets like COTWA and Reddit Men's Rights take issue with these things that it's finally seeping into the mainstream media that, gee, something can't be okay for one gender but not another. If you'd like a list of all the things COTWA has championed that were eventually picked up by paid writers in the mainstream media, we'd be here all day. Put it this way: if The Frisky hadn't taken the …
/r/MensRights19/10/15 02:42 PM
15

The issue for the women has never been about the legalities as much as the absence of consent and their expectations of privacy, separate and distinct from whether the law says a violation of that those expectations is actionable. Just because they make cameras that can see coins on the moon doesn't mean they should be used to spy on people in their most intimate moments. Just because a girl sends a naked photo to her boyfriend doesn't mean he should post it on-line (or vice versa). Sending a dr…
/r/MensRights19/10/15 02:11 PM
8

You've just described the modern feminist movement.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 02:01 PM
21

Note how this story is reported. The boy is not referred to as "the victim" as is typical in news reports about women who accuse men of sexual abuse (and note, it is not proper to call an accuser a "victim" but the double-standard is appalling). Declaring an accuser a "victim" manifests the "always believe the woman" attitude that has been a principal message of feminism for the past few decades. More important, if the boy is telling the truth, he would be victimized again: first, three years of…
/r/MensRights19/10/15 12:38 PM
5

They should focus on their false rape problem. It is the false rape capital of the world.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 12:29 PM
3

I gave up reporting on India's false rape problem years ago. That place is hopeless.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 12:28 PM
16

Good idea, Joeyjoefro.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 11:25 AM
9

Correct. For many years at COTWA, I would single out the actual writer of the article, but now I am of a mind to say to hell with that. The Frisky posts it, it needs to be accountable.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 10:51 AM
1

The problem is that consent means consent, but the sexual grievance industry is trying to scare people into thinking there is more to it.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 01:20 AM
2

I would be curious whether the "trainers" understand consent.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 11:10 AM
1

Here's how my blog covered this when it happened--five years ago. http://www.cotwa.info/2010/12/teenage-girl-locked-up-for-six-months.html
/r/MensRights12/10/15 03:03 PM
4

As a matter of policy, I agree that the police ought to be in the business of policing, investigating and solving crimes. My concern is the double-standard. When it comes to accusers, police aren't just investigating, they are veering off into social work (and it is much worse in the US--most of the citations in my OP here are US stories). Since tax dollars are being expended for accusers, the presumptively innocent and the wrongly accused deserve attention as well, but no one speaks up for them…
/r/MensRights08/10/15 10:52 PM
5

And, you know, for a long time, we were pretty much alone--now, at long last, there are some regular media outlets that speak to this issue (and by the way, they all read COTWA).
/r/MensRights08/10/15 10:30 PM
4

All due respect, he's not right--in the UK and the US there is a double-standard about how the wrongly accused and accusers are treated. Everyone's entitled to his own opinions but not his own facts. As for the UK, geniice's purported area of expertise: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3nz5ar/a_national_disgrace_another_young_man_accused_of/cvsz7gp
/r/MensRights08/10/15 10:27 PM
3

Whether it's the UK or the US, police are urged to become quasi-social workers when it comes to sexual assault accusers: Metropolitan Police Sexual Offence Investigative Techniques (SOIT) officers attend a rigorous training course. They will not judge the victim or the circumstances surrounding the offence but ensure that any immediate physical, mental and welfare needs are met. They will explain the criminal justice process and gather evidence and information in support of the investigation. Th…
/r/MensRights08/10/15 09:35 PM
3

Um, my "quotation marks" weren't referencing one particular police force. You are commenting on a post and a subject matter you do not understand. Here's the double standard you say doesn't exist in your backyard: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3nz5ar/a_national_disgrace_another_young_man_accused_of/cvsz7gp
/r/MensRights08/10/15 09:24 PM
5

It is peculiar, because they would not advocate discarding due process for any other group of persons accused of crimes. It really is a "women versus men" thing with them.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 08:15 PM
5

Not going to get into a pissing match with you. I wasn't referencing one particular police force but was speaking generically. I thought that was clear. I am always at a loss why some so-called Men's righters choose to take issue with one point and divert everyone's attention from the main issue. The fact is, geniice, many police forces are trained to be quasi-social workers when it comes to rape accusers. If you don't buy that, good for you.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 08:11 PM
3

You are too kind. I thought of that post I linked when I saw your reference to Ms. Comins.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 08:08 PM
1

Thank you, SetPhaserToStun.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 08:02 PM
5

Yes. http://www.cotwa.info/2015/09/appalling-trend-innocent-young-men-are.html
/r/MensRights08/10/15 08:00 PM
3

Yeah: consent means agreement, manifested in any manner. Period. The "experts" need to stop making this more complex than it really is.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 01:35 AM
3

Wait, wait, wait. You are missing the point. The point is the double standard. If it's okay to do this for auto insurance, it needs to be okay for health insurance. It can't be different for both.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 01:34 AM
1

But that is beside the point. The point is the double-standard.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 08:10 PM
1

Right. It is the double-standards that are most unjust, and I agree with you. But in the absence of doing it the right away, at the very least there should not be double-standards based on sex.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 06:19 PM
2

The point is the double-standard between auto and health insurance. Fairness dictates that men should not be held to a different standard.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 05:51 PM
4

That's it in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 05:48 PM
3

So? The point is, you are making all males pay more because of the past experience of some males. In health insurance, our government has recognized the unfairness in doing this when the genders were reversed.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 05:47 PM
2

Call it collectivism, call it a ham sandwich if you like, it is applying a double-standard for politicized reasons. More to the point, it is a policy concocted for the Democratic Party to curry favor with women voters, pure and simple. Group identity politics.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 05:46 PM
0

Oh, my, oh, my. Please just STOP with this nonsense! We need to stand up and tell our "moral superiors" to shut the hell up and stop sharing their ever-so enlightened views of the universe with us.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 05:42 PM
4

The men are almost as bad. Not quite.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 03:55 PM
3

I must take issue with this: "Women attempt suicide more . . . ." We are to believe that women are every bit as competent and efficient as men in every facet of life . . . except how to end it. This, of course, is just PC pablum intended to allow women to prevail, yet again, in the Oppression Olympics. Women may give the appearance of attempting suicide more, but they are not as committed to carrying it out as men. If they were, they would be more efficient at it. Men take their own lives by han…
/r/MensRights06/10/15 07:42 PM
11

Let's all hold our breath for it . . . .
/r/MensRights05/10/15 04:03 PM
3

Sadly, you are correct. The word does have a real meaning--the meaning assigned by the relevant criminal statutes. But the feminist sexual grievance lobby has clouded young women's thinking. A full 44 percent of college women think that when a woman gives a guy a "nod in agreement," that isn't enough for consent. Only 51 percent--the barest of majorities--think "a nod in agreement" indicates consent. That's a recipe for disaster for young men. And lest that other commentator accuse me of being "…
/r/MensRights05/10/15 03:13 PM
14

I used the definition that Harvard used--false or baseless. I am aware that the term "unfounded" is used in different ways, but, respectfully, your concern is not an issue in this instance.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 03:00 PM
13

I am sure the feminist community will be outraged by this story. (And, yes, that was sarcasm.) Forget the made up "war on women"--we may elect a president who wages her own war on men.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 01:12 PM
280

Where is the outrage from the feminist community? You can't appreciate gender inequality when such blatant double standards go unchallenged. Please note the boy's reaction to the encounter. The victim here is an afterthought--aside from his father's inane comments. The entire article focuses on the offender's immaturity--my guess is that every college rapist is equally immature in his own way. This is truly outrageous.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 01:11 PM
2

Nice. Caricaturing average white people as monsters. The smugness, the self-righteous superiority is disgusting. Sounds like every left wing pundit that can't do a real job but whose mission it is to tell America how wrong it is about everything. I wish Ted Cruz on you.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 08:52 PM
3

First, I don't think anything is beneath me. Second, I use that word "cluck" frequently and have never thought of it as a term directed at women. There is nothing anti-woman in my posts or. This particular post is anti-Maggie Cassidy, but she brought it on herself.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 04:00 AM
9

I didn't mean anything sexist by "clucking," tiqr. As for percentages, I learned a long time ago that we should not be asserting that we know how many false rape claims there. My position is--it doesn't matter. There are enough to be concerned about, just as there are enough sexual assaults to be concerned about. I find the "Oppression Olympics" repugnant and unnecessary. The only reason I cited the piece I cited was to make the point that false claims should not be trivialized.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 09:39 PM
3

http://falserapearchives.blogspot.com/1990/03/blog-post.html
/r/MensRights16/09/15 09:07 PM
5

No, no, no, no. The FBI never said 2-8 false. Read this--it explains what the FBI said: http://www.cotwa.info/p/false-rape-allegations-assault-on.html
/r/MensRights16/09/15 09:05 PM
5

http://www.cotwa.info/p/false-rape-allegations-assault-on.html
/r/MensRights16/09/15 09:04 PM
1

It is linked. And it doesn't say there are more false claims than actual rapes. It's just talking about claims that we can definitively state are true or false one way or the other -- a relatively small number.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 08:08 PM
3

You would do well to spend a a few months reading my blog, COTWA before spewing your uniformed bile all over the Internet: http://www.cotwa.info/ Here are a couple of primers on the problems: http://www.cotwa.info/2012/06/bygones-be-bygones-unspeakable.html (this post was praised by an Innocence Project lawyer from the office that freed Mr. Banks); http://www.cotwa.info/p/lambs-to-slaughter-hofstra-false-rape.html Here are some recent articles to help you understand that your ignorance does your…
/r/MensRights15/09/15 12:39 PM
6

Yes, you are woefully uninformed and do not merit debate.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 12:28 AM
3

Our jurisprudence is premised on "equal protection under the law." Blindfolded Lady Justice doesn't care who or what you are, she is supposed to mete out justice the same for everyone. "Diversity" is beside the point.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 07:02 PM
3

Love it.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 06:21 PM
27

He should be removed--and if he's innocent, what's the harm? He's not going to jail. He can go serve in some other legislature.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 05:23 PM
7

I am not sure what diversity has to do with the presumption of innocence, fairness, and inane uninformed voices who insist that wrongful expulsions are acceptable collateral damage in the war on college sexual assault. The "real debate" is over this question: how did eons-old notions of justice get co-opted by irrational gender zealots who are far less concerned about rape victims than about gender get-evenism.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 04:13 PM
6

Statement by FACE: http://www.cotwa.info/2015/09/face-responds-to-hearing-testimony-from.html
/r/MensRights11/09/15 03:51 PM
2

Okay, when are we going to stop pretending this person isn't an ass?
/r/MensRights11/09/15 01:02 PM
2

It is impossible to litigate these sorts of disputes in newspaper articles or on Reddit. This case will wind its way through the judicial process, and as is true with most litigation, likely settle in advance of a judicial resolution. There certainly is not enough information to opine on these issues now, given the procedural posture of the case. My point is much narrower--the other-worldly reaction to a legitimate discovery request is typical of the sexual grievance lobby's reaction to pretty m…
/r/MensRights09/09/15 09:38 PM
1

She said she's a virgin, former boyfriends might posit testimony to the contrary. Evidence is rarely definitive on any question.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 09:34 PM
2

Because most people don't really buy into the notion that men and women are interchangeable or that gender is social construct.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 05:45 PM
4

Because most people don't really buy into the notion that men and women are interchangeable or that gender is social construct.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 05:45 PM
5

RAINN, the foremost organization in America dedicated to helping rape victims, urges that the "rape culture" meme be mothballed. https://rainn.org/images/03-2014/WH-Task-Force-RAINN-Recommendations.pdf The meme is as divisive as it is grossly inaccurate. The only people who buy into are extremists looking for some measure of gender "get-evenism," not true advocates for victims of sexual assault. My advice: ignore this silliness.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 05:44 PM
7

To call her a loon is unfair to normal loons.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 08:43 PM
5

Minding the Campus is among the few sites in America that consistently highlights the hostility to due process for college men accused of sexual assault. I would hope that readers here would opt to visit the site that I linked to.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 08:39 PM
2

See this? We live in a culture where the term "rape" is so terribly overused, even blatant, ham-handed trolls like StockholmSJW conflate self-defense moves that have nothing to do with rape for "rape."
/r/MensRights03/09/15 10:12 PM
9

I don't like Jackson Katz--he's a card-carrying board member of the sexual grievance industry. His shtick is to focus on outlier attributes of some men in order to demonize men, as a class--and make money for Jackson Katz. He should point out that the vast majority of men practice what is, by any measure, healthy masculinity, but instead he focuses on the anti-social conduct of some men. I wrote this about him a few years ago--the font is funky because this was imported from our previous blog: h…
/r/MensRights03/09/15 08:29 PM
3

That sums it up well.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 10:04 PM
3

It was a mock-up they did on their Facebook page. They never pretended it was a real banner outside. It was meant to generate discussion on Facebook.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 08:31 PM
2

Not punish until the facts prove punishment is deserved. That's what.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 05:20 PM
1

You probably don't know that I've been writing about the "rape culture" for many years at COTWA and, before that, False Rape Society -- I am an expert on it, and what you are saying is not correct. They do not have a coherent theory, and you are putting words in their mouth. I suspect you are a troll.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 11:18 AM
0

You have not correctly described "rape culture." They are not nearly so coherent about it, and you are a troll.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 01:16 PM
4

This is what happens when rape hysteria becomes institutionalized--extreme measures are deemed not just acceptable but necessary. The hysteria is fanned by the paid sexual grievance industry, whose existence depends on it.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 08:38 PM
11

We're seeing a hell of a lot of tyranny from the left nowadays, in the service of group identity politics.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 08:36 PM
1

Nope. You don't. Stop trolling here.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 07:23 PM
1

Well, the fact is, you don't know what they mean by it.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 09:53 PM
1

"Needing help" is not the issue.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 05:08 PM
3

Actually, a wink is "rape culture" to folks like you. Why not just cut to the chase and say it: "We hate men."
/r/MensRights27/08/15 05:03 PM
1

Good, thanks.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 01:17 PM
1

How is this an update from the summer of 2014 when this story was in the news?
/r/MensRights27/08/15 12:09 PM
2

My bet: this will be used as a gun control lesson, not a lesson about masculinity.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 02:01 AM
2

She's an extremist zealot we've written about: http://www.cotwa.info/2011/01/the-myths-feminists-manufacture-to.html and http://www.cotwa.info/2010/12/feminist-how-dare-writers-who-don-know.html
/r/MensRights26/08/15 09:26 PM
5

I doubt that they'll do it here, given that the shooter was gay and black. They are apt to pick on young white men.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 09:21 PM
1

You have it backwards. "Consent" in the rape context is not judged by the secret, subjective wishes and desires of the accuser but, rather, by her outward, objective manifestations of assent. This mistake on your part is related to your other error: your assessment that it is "too easy" for guilty persons to go free when it comes to sexual assault is based on a faulty premise. You are assuming that that women who claim they were raped in polls were actually raped. http://www.cotwa.info/2015/06/i…
/r/MensRights19/08/15 05:24 PM
1

Here's the classic case of jubilation over penis mutilation--if you've never read this, don't do it on an empty stomach: http://www.cotwa.info/2010/06/this-date-in-history-lorena-bobbitt.html
/r/MensRights19/08/15 01:29 PM
1

I'm sorry, I am lost. ". . . so much of it turns on the subjective experience of one of the parties." So much of any traumatic experience "turns on the subjective experience of one of the parties." The difference with sexual assault on campus is that the parents, families and friends of a lot of victims and other sexual assault accusers don't know that the victim/accuser is sexually active, and this is a distinctive to reporting. Most rational people recognize that this is not a prudent reason t…
/r/MensRights19/08/15 01:20 PM
3

We need to find a better way to handle murder investigations; assault investigations; robbery investigations . . . . The system isn't perfect, but nothing is. This notion that rape is a "different" kind of crime is an idea whose time has come and gone, and enlightened feminists agree with that. The only reason it still has currency is because the college sexual grievance industry needs to hold onto as much as it can.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 08:22 PM
2

Robby Soave misfired here. While Lisak is a clown and isn't to be trusted, Mary Koss is part of the "rape is normalized" crowd and should never be quoted for anything. Unlike Lisak, Koss is a devotee of the "rape culture" gospel--that it isn't just a few men who rape, rape is part and parcel of our culture's view of "masculinity." Neither Lisak nor Koss are to be trusted.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 10:45 AM
1

No, not really. Did you see the debate last week? Those were all Fox News commentators. If only the other networks were as tough on Democrats as Fox News is on the GOP.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 01:49 PM
2

Did you see the debate last week? Those were all Fox News commentators. If only the other networks were as tough on Democrats as Fox News is on the GOP.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 01:48 PM
7

Correct. The due process and contract claims were rejected. The case is still in the very early pleading stage. The college hasn't even filed an answer yet (it filed a motion to dismiss instead). Next, the pleadings have to close, then a discovery period (several months), then likely summary judgment motions by one or the other. If the case proceeds, then the pre-trial, then the trial. A significant percentage of cases like this settle in advance on undisclosed terms.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 10:44 AM
1

I think you should actually read the story before you comment.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 05:24 PM
2

Will do. I'm a dinosaur.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 03:15 PM
3

I write a blog dedicated to the wrongly accused but I agree with your assessment.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 06:48 PM
1

After a lot of rewriting and meddling by the sexual grievance industry. I have no idea what it might look like at the end of that process.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 04:22 PM
1

Yeah, that's really a vapid discussion of the issue. By treating the rush-to-judgment stance as equally legitimate to due process, she gives license to those who would "round up the usual suspects" under the veneer of reasonable-sounding language. But the rush-to-judgment position is not valid or defensible, no matter how reasonable she wants to appear.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 01:45 PM
3

Thank you. It can be very frustrating.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 11:37 AM
21

I started to read that article, but there is not one mention of the only issue that matters in the whole debate about wrongful accusations: due process. Those people are hung up on proving that women hardly ever lie about rape and that men's "fears" of false rape claims are overblown. Wonder why she didn't mention COTWA and address the things we talk about? Actually, I don't wonder. It wouldn't fit the narrative.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 02:37 AM
2

Absolutely correct.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 04:06 PM
14

Here's a note I received from a reader: The more I hear from these people, the more I’m convinced . . . [t]heir brains simply don’t function in a way that separates them from less primates. Or, for that matter, from complex protozoa. I’d like Ms. Merriman to cite one example from the past five years in which “an assaulter” (how does she know? was she a witness to the crime?) was able to “sit across from a survivor and shout down their story.” One. Just one. I’d also, for that matter, like for he…
/r/MensRights30/07/15 04:05 PM
15

Each of us should urge our representatives to get behind this effort--even to sign onto it. http://www.house.gov/representatives/ And we should all write a letter to the editor in our local newspaper and urge our representatives in that forum to do the same: https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/1os8rz/how_to_get_your_senators_and_representatives/
/r/MensRights30/07/15 12:11 PM
10

I agree, but this is a very rare, and very positive thing. Let's all get behind it. This might be a great moment for activism.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 11:04 PM
3

I've analyzed it here: http://www.cotwa.info/2015/07/hallelujah-bill-is-introduced-in.html
/r/MensRights29/07/15 10:38 PM
5

The best way to fight injustice is to raise awareness about it. That's what's happening here.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 06:30 PM
5

They have become foes of due process--but only when it comes to one demographic group: young, mostly white, college men.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 06:24 PM
1

No, it's absolutely a backlash. It addresses two critical needs of the wrongly accused: the right to have an attorney and the standard of evidence. The former is the single most important thing that the US Congress can do for accused students--hands down. The latter is more symbolic than anything (because the fact is, it's unlikely that any kid ever chose a college based on whether it had a preponderance of the evidence versus a clear and convincing evidence standard). The earlier Senate bill--t…
/r/MensRights29/07/15 06:14 PM
19

Loon.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 05:09 PM
28

I am aware of the bell curve. My comments are directed to one quote--I am assuming the creator meant what he said about boys being stupid. The notion that women are incapable of stupidity is as sexist as the notion that women are incapable of brilliance. That the usual suspects recoil at the latter suggestion but not the former tells us all we need to know about them. And we all know that if the minions were a gaggle of brilliant characters, there'd be at least as many females as males among the…
/r/MensRights18/07/15 08:12 PM
208

Here's a snippet from the comments: ralf ...because insulting and hating boys is ok in the fucked-up sexist world in that we live... what a asshole.. makes me sick... mikemike9 Quick! Get to Reddit! There's probably a thread already posted where you will find likeminded people. The rest of us are noting that, yes, minions all behave like silly, clumsy, boisterous, hilarious little boys. Which is what makes them so much fun. And maybe what makes them so beloved by a female audience. Just sayin' p…
/r/MensRights18/07/15 05:32 PM
1

I like Ashe.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 03:16 PM
2

It's not "either or," although the people who dominate the public discourse on rape insist it is. Every civilized society must strive to eradicate heinous criminality by punishing offenders, but it also must insure that the innocent aren't punished with them. It's difficult to walk that fine line, but it has to be done.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 03:16 PM
1

No, I am not telling you it is "impossible." I am saying that in virtually all cases I am aware of, the presence of such a video would be very, very strong evidence of innocence. I study this issue very closely and am not speaking from uninformed opinion.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 12:51 PM
0

Naaah. If I were representing a kid accused of sexual assault who used this to record consent, I'd be thrilled. No jury in America is going to convict a kid who did this.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 12:02 PM
1

In theory you are correct, but that's not how it plays out in the real world. Folks who follow the issue closely (I am one of them) see an unmistakable link between the "hook-up" culture and rape and false rape claims.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 06:33 PM
8

Excellent point. The sad fact is that the sexual grievance industry thrives on the perception that rape is rampant. If rape were ever eradicated, they'd be out of business.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 04:16 PM
10

Yes. If these things become widely used, the failure to use them in a given case will be cited as evidence of rape. And note that consent can always be withdrawn. Even contracts in a commercial setting that contain "no oral modification" clauses can be orally modified by agreement, waiver, estoppel, or course of performance. The same is even more true here where it takes only one party's unilateral withdrawal of consent to turn love-making into rape. But if I'm representing a kid accused of rape…
/r/MensRights13/07/15 12:42 PM
4

They want to redefine masculinity. I agree -- "it is as unsustainable as it is bizarre."
/r/MensRights08/07/15 02:46 PM
2

Of course we can, and must, expect young men to speak up for themselves, and it ain't going to change without the victims fighting back--the way young male victims of racism fought back and the way young men subject to the military draft protested the war back in the '60s. No one is suggesting it's going to be easy in the current climate, only that it is clear it isn't going to happen without them.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 04:32 AM
1

Oh, well. It ain't going to change without the victims fighting back, the way young male victims of racism and the war draft fought back in the '60s.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 04:26 AM
7

You are mistaken if you think the male enrollment numbers are dropping because of false accusations.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 04:15 AM
18

It is absolutely perplexing to me. Liberal Harvard and Penn law professors, and many others, are speaking out about rights for college men in ways far more forceful than I could ever do--and the college men themselves yawn.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 10:46 PM
2

Not exactly original: http://www.cotwa.info/2015/01/takeaway-from-new-university-report-on.html
/r/MensRights23/06/15 11:18 AM
12

You are exactly correct that too many women apparently don't know how to say "no." They are worn down by college guys' entreaties for sex, then after they give into it, they claim they were "coerced." http://www.cotwa.info/2015/06/study-shows-rape-rates-sharply-reduced.html
/r/MensRights18/06/15 06:06 PM
33

Friends, is there any wonder there's a "rape epidemic" on campus when so many of our daughters don't know that a nod of agreement constitutes consent? Seriously? Maybe THAT should have been my headline. There's so much wrong with this thing, I didn't know where to begin. One thing is clear to me: the sexual grievance machine has really messed up our kids' heads with its rape hysteria. Congratulations, extremists--you've won. Our kids are officially brainwashed.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 04:51 PM
18

No, the issue isn't so much nonverbal communication, it's psychological coercion--so-called "unwanted" sex that occurs when women give in to guys' nagging for sex. That's sexual assault at many if not most colleges today.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 03:46 PM
4

To the perpetrators of this vandalism we say: we understand that you are angry, but believe that your anger is misplaced. We regret that you resorted to vandalism to make your point. … We believe that that the best way to resolve issues is through communication. To that end, if there is a way to facilitate greater understanding through open dialogue, we are willing to meet with you and hear what you have to say – no questions asked and no charges filed. What a terrible response. The appropriate …
/r/MensRights30/05/15 08:40 PM
4

http://www.cotwa.info/2015/05/mattress-girl-emma-sulkowicz-makes-yet.html
/r/MensRights28/05/15 09:36 PM
3

PLEASE UPVOTE THIS. Thanks for posting it, Imnotmrabut.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 06:05 PM
2

The murder of innocent men and boys is mentioned as a parenthetical, barely an afterthought. Does the news media not understand that when most fair-minded people read this they are going to wonder why the news media treats half the population of planet earth as less important than house pets?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 05:59 PM
1

Kindly don't throw the word "slander" around so loosely.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 03:05 PM
1

He's pandering.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 12:35 PM
12

She's like a wind-up doll that never disappoints. She can always be counted on to say the wrong thing, and to say it with malice.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 12:34 PM
7

Definitely rape, if her version is correct. If the statute of limitations hasn't run, she ought to be in prison for years. The fact that this hasn't attracted a lot of attention tells us all we need to know.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 12:06 PM
1

You are malicious! Upvote!
/r/MensRights26/05/15 09:57 PM
1

It's only "too long" for the generation of nitwits whose attention spans rival that of a gnat.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 02:16 AM
2

No, it's not as bad. http://www.cotwa.info/2012/05/barbaric-it-is-worth-risk-to-punish.html And, there is enormous doubt about whether this "rape" occurred, as Cathy Young has written and as revealed in the court documents filed in the accused man's suit. And, no, COTWA does not "take sides."
/r/MensRights22/05/15 11:54 AM
5

That's a very interesting observation.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 07:31 PM
13

I disagree with this comment. The woman waltzed right by the dean to the right, who was standing there shaking hands with every graduate, without making any attempt to shake his hand. Then she made no attempt to shake the president's hand. What she wanted was an affirming smile from the president, but an affirming smile wasn't warranted under the circumstances--after all, the man has been named in a lawsuit because of this clown, and she openly defied the university and brought that monstrosity …
/r/MensRights21/05/15 06:53 PM
6

What happens to the urinals? Too threatening?
/r/MensRights21/05/15 06:22 PM
7

Who would hire someone whose honesty is open to question? It's a shame someone didn't pull her aside and tell her that this manic obsession could backfire in her face. But my guess is that some feminist organization will hire her since those groups are happy to preach to the choir and always "believe the woman" even in the face of massive doubts.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 06:21 PM
4

Ha!
/r/MensRights21/05/15 05:39 PM
5

You are way too kind, AlphaWookie.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 05:38 PM
20

Wonderful comment.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 05:38 PM
11

Well, her sentence could have been lighter-- for example, if she had cut off his penis.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 01:41 PM
2

Well you never made any such comment to me, and I would never accuse anyone who does such nice work as you do of hurting the cause. Keep up the good work!
/r/MensRights18/05/15 06:54 PM
7

We covered this story last month--read the other stories that happened at the same time: http://www.cotwa.info/2015/04/a-whirl-around-world-of-false-rape.html
/r/MensRights18/05/15 03:10 PM
2

I am curious why you think I was referencing you--I wasn't. And, frankly, by November of 2011, it was already the biggest story in the "men's movement." I started writing about a week after the letter was issued in April--and I posted about it constantly after that. http://www.cotwa.info/2011/04/title-ix-sexual-assault-directive-has.html
/r/MensRights18/05/15 11:17 AM
4

http://lcbackerblog.blogspot.com/2015/05/sexual-assualt-at-american-law.html
/r/MensRights16/05/15 01:48 AM
15

I think that by talking about it, by spreading the word, by injecting this story into the wider public discourse, it will encourage a hell of a lot of respected scholars and writers to take a public stand. The only serious people who want these sorts of laws are gender ideologues. The scholars at the ALI generally are not effected by public outcries or "law and order" lynch mobs the way college presidents are. Let's help make this an issue so that prominent law professors and people of good will…
/r/MensRights15/05/15 09:08 PM
3

Exactly. This is happening in a meeting that won't be covered by the news media, yet it will have far more widespread implications than any of the college sexual assault stories we've covered the past few years.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 06:51 PM
36

Clearly the backlash has started: http://www.cotwa.info/2014/12/2014-in-review-year-of-backlash-against.html Whether the nutjobs will redouble their efforts is unknown.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 05:27 PM
2

School administrators use that "distraction to the boys" meme as a cover--a handy excuse--to enforce dress codes. The fact is, our culture is filled with mores and customs about what is acceptable and what is not acceptable for every phase of human behavior, including dress. Yet when girls want to flaunt societal conventions in dress codes, they wrap themselves in the mantle of feminism and start sputtering inane buzzwords to masquerade as gender victims. If a boy showed that much skin on his ba…
/r/MensRights13/05/15 07:01 PM
2

First, I do not speak for MRAs. My blog addresses the same kinds of concerns about the hostility to due process that the Harvard and Penn law professors (almost all of the them liberal) expressed in the article cited in my post--only they do it much more forcefully than I do. My posts appear on this subreddit because some people here are interested in these issues. Second, I have no idea about preaching to the choir, but anyone who believes that the adversarial system is "fucked" ought not to be…
/r/MensRights07/05/15 06:16 PM
2

http://www.cotwa.info/2014/12/2014-in-review-year-of-backlash-against.html
/r/MensRights05/05/15 05:56 PM
1

He's an ass with a radical feminist agenda.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 10:34 PM
2

What an ass. He was rooting for Jordan Johnson to be found guilty. Remember that case? Mr. Johnson and his unnamed accuser had been flirtatious, and at a university ball, the accuser purportedly told Mr. Johnson, “Jordy, I would do you anytime.” They went back to her apartment, and after their encounter, the accuser cried rape, Mr. Johnson denied it, and the accuser sent a text to a friend: "The reason I feel this whole situation is my fault is because I feel like I gave Jordan mixed signals whi…
/r/MensRights23/04/15 10:30 PM
1

The ball cutting? This is all too triggering for me.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 10:24 PM
9

Take a look what prominent feminists have said in recent months and then you might understand why even labeling yourself "feminist" poses problems: http://www.cotwa.info/2014/12/2014-in-review-year-of-backlash-against.html
/r/MensRights16/04/15 07:45 PM
2

The premise of your comment is curious, because no one is advocating treating ambiguous consent as consent. There has to be actual consent -- there is not and never has been any dispute about that. Consent can be and always has been manifested in an endless variety of ways, and to dictate otherwise is to impose artificial constructs that do not comport with normal human interactions and that could lead to absurd and wholly unjust results (e.g., actual consent was present, but because the consent…
/r/MensRights14/04/15 12:38 AM
8

Exactly. The sexual grievance industry peddles a narrative that assumes every accusation was a rape. Rape apologists claim women routinely lie about rape. Both claims are anti-intellectual. To assert that the evidence of most college rape claims is murky is simply a fact, not a conclusion about whether a given rape really happened. Let's make this clear since the reader you responded to assumes we're big bad rape apologists here. A claim that falls in that vast gray area should not be ignored ev…
/r/MensRights13/04/15 08:03 PM
10

A typical piece of dreck from the sexual grievance industry: the goal is to demonstrate that the respondents buy into so-called "rape myths."
/r/MensRights13/04/15 07:13 PM
2

He deserves what's going to happen to him.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 03:13 PM
10

No hearing until the sanction (punishment) phase -- after a finding of guilt. In effect, due process will be afforded during the sentencing phase.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 06:03 PM
24

I'm sorry, I'm lost. Exactly how would "feminism" cause women to be less fearful walking down a dark street? (For that matter, how would feminism cause MEN to be less fearful? You might want to tell your feminist friends that even according to feminist writers, "[m]en are 150 percent more likely to be the victims of violent crimes than women are. . . . . Men are more likely to be victimized by a stranger (63 percent of violent victimizations) . . . ." J. Friedman, J. Valenti, Yes Means Yes: Visi…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 02:51 PM
1

The story cannot be divorced from "rape culture," which is an animating impulse of modern feminism. Here's a well-written explanation: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/31qhlq/it_is_downright_impossible_to_divorce_erdelys/ And I've been saying this for months: http://www.cotwa.info/2014/12/the-rolling-stone-debacle-didnt-happen.html
/r/MensRights07/04/15 11:09 AM
2

Really? The Times said she made it. I am not sure if it is the entire statement.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 02:03 AM
2

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/06/business/media/statement-from-writer-of-rolling-stone-rape-article-sabrina-erdely.html?_r=0 -- that's it, I think.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 09:56 PM
19

The writer of this sad piece doesn't realize how bigoted she comes off. Sorry, lady, but the fact you think your prejudices against dreaded males is somehow more acceptable than prejudices against blacks, Hispanics, or Muslims doesn't make it so.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 08:33 PM
7

She writes like a self-righteous child.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 12:10 PM
4

The difference between intoxicated and incapacitated is one recognized even by NCHERM, the preeminent victims' advocates on campus. "Drunk" is not necessarily incapacitated.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 05:19 PM
4

First, I've written extensively about these issues. I agree that education is essential, but here's how it needs to be tailored: http://www.cotwa.info/2013/12/root-cause-of-rape-and-false-rape.html Second, sex with an incapacitated person is rape. Period. Dr. Lisak says that the vast majority of rape is committed by a relatively small group of sociopaths -- and they don't do it in dark alleys, either. They seek out their prey at parties. I've done a bunch of posts about his various findings on t…
/r/MensRights27/03/15 04:27 PM
7

Dr. Lisak has said that mild educational efforts don't stop the sociopaths who commit the vast majority of rapes. Or do you think these were normal boys? If so, you have a very low opinion of boys.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 02:24 PM
18

The implication of these ads is simple, and intentional: rape is "normalized" among males in our society, and young men are natural sexual predators. Boys have to be reminded not to rape the same as they have to be reminded to wash their hands after peeing. They call it "rape culture," and if you want to see its effects, see here: http://www.cotwa.info/2014/12/the-rolling-stone-debacle-didnt-happen.html And by the way, even RAINN, the nation's leading anti-rape organization, has urged the zealot…
/r/MensRights27/03/15 12:21 PM
29

Since it can't be definitively proved "false" (even though there is no credible evidence that it occurred), then this is precisely the kind of "rape" claim that would be credited as a definitive rape in every single rape survey used to justify the erosion of due process rights for men accused of rape on campus.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 07:37 PM
2

Here, read what the leading anti-rape organization in America, RAINN, says about "rape culture" -- https://rainn.org/images/03-2014/WH-Task-Force-RAINN-Recommendations.pdf. "Rape is caused not by cultural factors but by the conscious decisions, of a small percentage of the community, to commit a violent crime." RAINN decried the "inclination to focus on particular . . . traits that are common in many millions of law-abiding Americans (e.g., 'masculinity'), rather than on the subpopulation at fau…
/r/MensRights13/03/15 07:48 PM
6

What a terribly lame excuse for her misandry and racism. This is about as bad as it gets.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 11:40 AM
18

Unfortunately, there is a marked political component to the issue I write about. The hostility to due process when it comes to men accused of sexual assault has been given articulation by the current Dept. of Education and the current administration, and it's purely political. I appreciate your sentiment but can't support it with respect to my issue. I follow these issues closely -- here's my blog: http://www.cotwa.info/
/r/MensRights08/03/15 04:08 PM
2

I would love that.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 02:01 PM
3

Don't be so harsh on him. He's also the guy who, just last year, was condemned by feminists for his comments on why his Internet show doesn't feature more women: "Funny is the world that I live in. You’re funny, I’m interested. You’re not funny, I’m not interested. I have no interest in gender or race or anything like that.”
/r/MensRights05/03/15 01:57 PM
134

Imagine a male CEO: "Personally, I prefer attending a club with all men."
/r/MensRights05/03/15 01:35 PM
15

A Woman leader must "bring her woman-ness to her leadership style" which means empathy, compassion and "someone whose head and heart are not bifurcated," she said. When did it become "feminist" to suggest people have inherent qualities based on gender" Oh, that's right -- it only applies when the qualities are "good" for women and "bad" for men. In other words, to suggest that women are inherently inferior about anything would be sexist, but not so when the genders are reversed. So much for "fem…
/r/MensRights05/03/15 01:33 PM
2

That's an echo from this true incident: http://www.cotwa.info/2012/08/the-summer-when-rape-lie-pitted-town.html
/r/MensRights05/03/15 01:18 PM
3

Thanks for the kind words, AlphaWookie.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 01:04 PM
1

You are way too kind.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 01:04 PM
1

Read the opinion referenced, it's a good primer. The Yale student is wrong.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 07:00 PM
53

Right. The feminist community on campus is driving the discussion.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 02:02 PM
3

Add this to your list: http://www.cotwa.info/2015/03/university-of-wisconsin-panel.html
/r/MensRights03/03/15 01:22 PM
1

I stopped reading after a few paragraphs. It buys into the destructive "rape culture" meme: http://www.cotwa.info/2014/12/the-rolling-stone-debacle-didnt-happen.html
/r/MensRights01/03/15 11:02 PM
2

Yes!
/r/MensRights28/02/15 10:00 PM
6

Please don't be writing about the circumstances of your case here or anywhere else -- listen to what your lawyer tells you. Anything you write could be discoverable in a college proceeding, a civil action, or a criminal action. It is not in your interest to be making statements about your case, even if you think the statements don't hurt you. Too often the innocent think they can just tell the truth in their own words and everything will be alright. That's not how it works, as every attorney wil…
/r/MensRights27/02/15 06:34 PM
12

You are right -- there is a sort of inevitability to it. "Forget it, Jake. It's Chinatown."
/r/MensRights27/02/15 04:48 PM
3

Is that a request? You got it.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 03:23 PM
1

Feminism is working . . . on what? Oh, men's issues? Okay, so how's that due process thing coming for presumptively innocent college men accused of sex offenses?
/r/MensRights26/02/15 03:04 AM
2

Upvote.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 08:28 PM
4

Thanks--here's a more elaborate discussion I wrote a while back: http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/feminist-violence/it-is-time-to-stop-waging-the-war-on-sexual-violence-with-the-memes-of-the-hangman/
/r/MensRights25/02/15 05:31 PM
7

Correct. It's an interpretation of the law, and one that is flawed. It was promulgated in the still of the night.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 05:15 PM
13

Oh, no, they are smart to sign anonymously.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 03:50 PM
2

http://www.cotwa.info/2015/02/angry-penn-law-student-lashes-out-at.html
/r/MensRights25/02/15 01:41 PM
3

It's my site, and the sources we use are all legitimate news sources. If you notice, I listed several different news sources at the bottom. I get notes from people telling me their false rape stories, but I don't publish them if they haven't been vetted by a source with editorial controls. By the way, this story was picked up by other, even bigger, news outlets yesterday if you want to check it out on Google News.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 12:13 PM
25

That damn patriarchy, always looking after men.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 09:49 PM
3

I do that sort of headline to illustrate that some people have no hesitation about destroying the lives of innocent men or boys for incredibly selfish, sometimes petty reasons. I suspect this headline doesn't elicit sympathy as much as contempt. One of our themes is the incredible power of rape lies -- I want people to appreciate why it's important not to rush to judgment when a woman cries rape.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 09:30 PM
3

Very important point: these tribunals aren't equipped to do "justice" of any kind.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 02:30 PM
2

His talk "overall" was about the necessity for due process, and the students said "bullshit." You and they can characterize it any way you want, that's the reality.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 03:53 AM
3

Love it.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 09:12 PM
15

Yeah, come to think of it, Bigfoot has a lot more legitimacy than the sexual grievance industry's myths.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 03:38 PM
45

Right. I don't understand how insisting that everyone is entitled to due process is "defending" a group.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 03:02 PM
53

That's an insightful observation.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 02:13 PM
190

If the accused was male, they would immediately turn on him.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 01:25 PM
4

Here's a good example about why that second column needs to allow comments: http://www.cotwa.info/2015/02/another-anonymous-self-proclaimed-rape.html
/r/MensRights16/02/15 03:10 AM
5

Allow me to translate: comments will be allowed if they parrot the bow-wow of the sexual grievance industry, but they will be excluded if they don't march in lockstep to the PC group-think of our moral superiors, the campus anti-rape activists.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 03:07 AM
21

It's nice to see a feminist admit what she really is: a hypocrite, a fraud. This is jaw-droppingly stupid.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 03:04 AM
15

It's what I do.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 04:37 PM
1

If I had known, I would have been more careful about writing it.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 05:06 PM
1

Thanks for mentioning this. These cases are widely underreported by the victims, and then by the news media.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 01:47 PM
3

Through my work with COTWA, I have come to believe that no group is more victimized by wrongful rape claims than minority boys and young men. When women look to lie about rape, they often invent a "scary" black or Hispanic man. When young minority males are wrongly accused, they typically face a very tough battle to be exonerated. Brian Banks actually pleaded guilty and spent years in prison because his attorney convinced him that no jury would believe a black male teenager. The Hofstra gang nee…
/r/MensRights10/02/15 01:30 PM
1

Amen, brother!
/r/MensRights10/02/15 11:53 AM
3

Few would get the irony because it's so common for organizations to not comment, and nobody would read that story. I'm kind of an authority on headlines that people read -- not just from by experience at COTWA but also having written for a major U.S. daily. Just a fact.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 11:52 AM
24

If they are able to prove that, I hope they're awarded a huge verdict.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 11:41 PM
9

If you read my blog, you know that I give as much information as possible in the title. I could not think of a way of saying what happened here in a sufficiently short space and I did not intend to offend anyone.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 11:40 PM
13

"Mockingbird" had important lessons about race and gender. The lessons about race have long been forgotten; the lessons about gender were never learned.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 06:17 PM
3

September of last year. I should have included it.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 06:16 PM
4

It's "affirmative and transgressive" -- meaning, in your face, men? Wow.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 03:45 PM
49

Last year in the U.S., feminist professors attempted to prove campus rape is an epidemic by pointing to schools where there are no rapes. http://www.cotwa.info/2014/07/feminist-professors-attempt-to-prove.html
/r/MensRights09/02/15 02:12 PM
9

From the post: Was Sulkowicz in denial about being raped (as she clearly stated earlier), or was she a woman intent on "understanding" why she was assaulted, as she says now? The two positions do not seem to be consistent. And how did she go from wanting to see, "hang out" and have "real time" with Paul Nunsegger (and in the process telling him she loved him), to allegedly being terrified of running into him and of suffering great trauma when she was near him? Again, how are these positions cons…
/r/MensRights09/02/15 12:09 AM
2

Done.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 02:41 PM
3

Okay, you're out.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 03:29 AM
4

Smear for the sake of smear, because they disagree with Paul's site. A disgrace.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 01:44 AM
9

In response to number 2, read this and then you tell me what you think (and please, by all means, check out the sources if you have any doubts about what you're reading): http://www.cotwa.info/2014/12/2014-in-review-year-of-backlash-against.html
/r/MensRights06/02/15 04:27 PM
1

I have no doubt that there are many well-meaning persons who identify as "feminist," who act in good faith and with the best of intention. I also agree that rape accusers need to be treated with dignity and respect, and their claims need a full and fair hearing. But, respectfully, I do not think both sides want a fair trial. The sexual grievance industry is after funding, and it never evinces satisfaction with the process if it yields a result it does not like. A case in point: A jury acquitted …
/r/MensRights06/02/15 04:15 PM
10

Yeah. Read the last part--where I talk about the textbook case where this occurred, Hofstra, and watch the video.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 01:26 PM
5

The feminists complain this woman, and women who cry rape in general, aren't believed unless they are "perfect" rape victims. This is more straw man than we've seen since Ray Bolger met up with Dorothy on the Yellow Brick Road. Let's be honest, for feminists who write about rape, even raising the possibility that the accused is innocent is enough to elicit cries of misogyny, rape apologia, and victim blaming. The real question for the feminists is this: is it possible for the accused to ever be …
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:50 AM
7

I like "conniption" better than "tantrum" because I think "tantrum" is too mild for their reaction.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 11:54 PM
4

The links to the referenced articles are embedded in the text.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 11:52 PM
9

My advice: drop the class.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 10:36 PM
76

Here's all you have to know about this extremist: Ezra Klein evinced satisfaction that possibly innocent young men will be expelled for rapes they didn't commit: "Critics worry that colleges will fill with cases in which campus boards convict young men (and, occasionally, young women) of sexual assault for genuinely ambiguous situations. Sadly, that’s necessary for the law’s success. It’s those cases — particularly the ones that feel genuinely unclear and maybe even unfair, the ones that become …
/r/MensRights05/02/15 03:32 PM
6

It's the narrative that's all-important to these folks.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 03:13 PM
1

Read this and maybe you'll understand that it's not "either/or": http://www.cotwa.info/2014/12/2014-in-review-year-of-backlash-against.html
/r/MensRights05/02/15 02:23 PM
2

Well, that's their playbook every time--they've been doing this for years and nothing ever changes.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 10:52 PM
2

Thanks -- this story is starting to unravel like "Jackie's" at UVA.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 10:33 PM
6

The chickens have come home to roost.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 09:26 PM
13

And that was AFTER she was "raped." Yep. If a jury heard that, they would be out for maybe 5 minutes before coming back with a resounding "NOT GUILTY." But no sane prosecutor would bring that case to trial.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 07:52 PM
22

Yeah. Nutcases and "statistical guilt." The kid is a well-meaning jackass.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 04:53 PM
24

Columbia's journalism school was retained by Rolling Stone to whitewash -- I mean, investigate its "Jackie" rape story. I am chuckling at the very thought.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 03:40 PM
9

No, it's not patriarchy, it's radical feminism run amok. Start reading these and see how far you get before you vomit: http://www.cotwa.info/2014/12/2014-in-review-year-of-backlash-against.html
/r/MensRights04/02/15 12:53 PM
7

Because the usual suspects would prefer to have women do safe, non-dirty jobs but get paid the same wages as men doing unsafe, dirty jobs. They call it "the wage gap."
/r/MensRights03/02/15 10:07 PM
6

I think you raise good points. I often say that if we had a poll taken, virtually everything I write about would be supported by the vast majority of people. But, like a lot of other areas, policy is made by a small, committed group that has a vested interest -- even though their views are in the minority. Sadly, policy about sexual assault is driven by women's studies professors, their students, and paid sexual assault advocates. And I definitely agree that most people are blithely unaware of t…
/r/MensRights03/02/15 10:03 PM
4

Thanks. We should all be grateful that one of the school's male students wasn't targeted during the short-lived investigation.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 09:56 PM
5

Love it. Great message.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 08:43 PM
35

I can't speak for this subreddit, I write COTWA -- http://www.cotwa.info/ -- and I very much appreciate your post. It is my belief that the views you've expressed are representative of the views of people of your generation. When we leave the echo chamber of gender zealotry and advocacy, it's well to remember that the vast majority of women and men believe that men and women are equal, that neither gender has a monopoly on vice or virtue, and that arbitrary double-standards based on gender, sex,…
/r/MensRights03/02/15 08:29 PM
3

That is positively sick.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 05:47 PM
2

The stress of a wrongly accused person being subjected to a polygraph -- with all those terrible consequences hanging over his head -- is likely much, much, much more severe than someone who has been assaulted, sexually or otherwise.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 09:10 PM
2

I can think of few things worse than a false rape claim. It can be devastating and life altering. It drives some men and boys to suicide. Unlike a terrible assault that is in the past, the wrongly accused are forced to anticipate spending possibly years in prison where unspeakable things happen to "rapists," their entire lives destroyed -- they will lose their homes, their jobs, any prospects for gainful employment later, and they may lose their wives and friends. Businessmen see their businesse…
/r/MensRights02/02/15 08:56 PM
8

Reducing the male gender to vile caricature, and presuming frat boys are rapists-in-waiting, is about controlling male sexuality.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 07:37 PM
9

"Even if it was a false accusation the rehashing of the event would not be traumatizing for the accused, because it never happened." Unfortunately, I can tell you from studying hundreds, or thousands, of these cases for COTWA, that's not how it works.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 05:28 PM
14

The suspect wouldn't be stressed, knowing his life might be effectively over because of a rape claim? I'm no fan of polygraphs, I merely point out the double-standard.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 04:57 PM
36

That's my point: this has been the animating premise of the "war on rape" from the outset, but it's only being noticed when women are being inconvenienced. (Note the interesting dilemma: they couldn't resort to their usual playbook and whine that it's "the men" who should be punished -- because the ban they were upset about prevented them from seeing the men.)
/r/MensRights02/02/15 02:37 PM
2

No.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 01:01 AM
1

Love it.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 05:37 PM
3

It will never end, will it?
/r/MensRights31/01/15 01:50 PM
1

Can't wait to read about this.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 01:50 PM
1

Hilarious!
/r/MensRights31/01/15 01:49 PM
3

No, here's the point of feminism when it comes to the issue I write about -- read some of these and tell me that the Telegraph knows what the hell it is talking about: http://www.cotwa.info/2014/12/2014-in-review-year-of-backlash-against.html
/r/MensRights31/01/15 01:49 PM
2

If you follow these issues, you will understand that even today, young black males face an almost insurmountable burden when they are accused of this crime.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 03:33 AM
3

Yeah, that "due process" silliness is a luxury college women who claim they were raped can't afford.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 11:10 PM
2

Beautiful! You're on a roll lately, and that's saying a lot.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 11:10 PM
1

Ohhh, Sweden! I don't even write about Sweden at my blog if I can avoid it. http://www.cotwa.info/ Good luck, brother!
/r/MensRights30/01/15 10:26 PM
1

Right!
/r/MensRights30/01/15 10:23 PM
1

HA! I thought you were going to return there to practice law after you leave the senate?
/r/MensRights30/01/15 08:27 PM
2

The article says that approach doesn't work, and it doesn't. There's nothing more to say about it. Please, stop trolling here.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 08:01 PM
3

Nope. It's an approach that doesn't work. That's not my opinion, it's a fact. Dr. David Lisak, sociologist and feminist darling, says that mild educational efforts telling men not to rape don't stop the predators who commit virtually all the rapes.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 05:10 PM
5

"Consent" is like pregnancy, either it's there or its not. It can be manifested in more ways than a statute can ever chronicle. Teaching people to make sure there's consent is a great idea; making some murky "affirmative" consent law -- that suggests you might be a "rapist" if there was just a little but not enough consent -- is madness.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 04:44 PM
3

Can't follow your "logic." All I can tell is you had a hissy fit over something I wrote, and I don't have to wade through the dead sea scrolls to figure out what the hell you're trying to say.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 04:41 PM
2

"tell men not to rape" is loony feminist cult stuff. Stop trolling here.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 04:28 PM
2

No time to read. Have a nice life, and stop trolling here.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 03:34 PM
1

You do know, don't you, that yours is my favorite name on Reddit. Senator.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 02:55 PM
1

Because the women know the frat houses are not rape pits.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 02:01 PM
2

Wait, wait, wait -- I think it's pretty clear that most students, like most people, including sorority sisters, aren't buying into rape culture. If they really thought these were rape dens, would many of them go? I sincerely doubt it.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 01:31 PM
6

You would do well to school yourself on the issues, and to take a basic writing class so people can understand what the hell you are trying to say. While I can't respond to your comment because I am not able to understand it, I will say this: the sexual grievance industry has expended enormous taxpayer and tuition resources in the past two decades to wage war on "rape," and their solutions (as I've outlined in the post) have been singularly, and laughably, ineffective (ironically, it's the sexua…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 12:00 PM
7

I'm sure they could, but it seems to be a cultural thing.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 11:02 PM
17

Here's what I believe: the sexual grievance industry has its tentacles in virtually every public college, and on every campus there are a relatively small but noisy group of gender zealots (emanating from the taxpayer funded sexual assault advisors, Women's Studies professors and some devoted students--some of the latter write for the student newspaper or have sympathetic friends who write for the paper). They are the ones who cause virtually all the noise. The sorority sisters? Few see a rape e…
/r/MensRights29/01/15 10:58 PM
22

Maybe they don't want to waste the money? Maybe the guys have always done it? Maybe they're afraid nobody would show up? Maybe all of the above.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 10:25 PM
27

Yeah, it's to the point of pure silliness. And the women still want to go to the rape pits!
/r/MensRights29/01/15 10:24 PM
41

Exactly. And don't be surprised when women get upset about such treatment.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 09:53 PM
17

Wow. This means a lot, SigmundFloyd. I can tell you that in a number of small ways -- may be too much "inside baseball" stuff to detail here -- we've helped change the public discourse on these issues. There are several arguments that are widely circulated that I was the first to toss out there, and it's nice to see so many mainstream media folks and law school profs. jumping on it. When we started, it was pretty much me beating the drum on these issues.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 09:20 PM
7

Off-topic: this is really funny. Hats off to SOMT: http://sockdo.blogspot.com/2015/01/the-brave-lads-of-texas-tech-defend.html
/r/MensRights29/01/15 08:49 PM
15

Thanks very much.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 08:32 PM
37

Right. The appropriate approach is to be rational -- colleges and especially frat houses are hotbeds for unfavorable sexual encounters of every kind. Raging hormones and alcohol are a problem Serial rapists exist (per Dr. Lisak's studies), and it is well to educate everyone about them so that everyone is on guard. But this steady diet that insists "masculinity" needs a makeover, etc. is just insanity.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 07:36 PM
6

In my experience, the editor has final say over the headline.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 07:20 PM
19

The guidelines are ostensibly gender neutral but they have been promulgated because it is believed the rape of women by men is at epic levels. The guidelines are like many other guidelines in this area--they will rarely be used against women. The problem with the guidelines is in suggesting that innocent actions of the presumptively innocent should be deemed evidence of guilt.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 01:58 PM
104

In the UK, if you act 'normal and reasonable' following a sexual encounter, such conduct might be used as evidence to convict you of rape: http://www.cotwa.info/2015/01/in-uk-if-you-act-normal-and-reasonable.html AS POSTED AT COMMUNITY OF THE WRONGLY ACCUSED: Following a lawful sexual encounter, if a man or boys acts "normal and reasonable," such conduct might be used as evidence to convict him of rape. And, no, we're not making that up. In the UK, "[n]ew guidelines issued to police and prosecut…
/r/MensRights29/01/15 01:35 PM
3

Thanks. I need to highlight this analysis. Wow--really impressive.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 03:32 PM
1

Right, feminism is "me, me, me."
/r/MensRights28/01/15 03:31 PM
5

I stopped at the first one on the upper left, which is both factually wrong and intentionally divisive. Here's the facts: When it comes to violence, men win the Oppression Olympics by a long shot. "Men are 150 percent more likely to be the victims of violent crimes than women are. . . . Men are more likely to be victimized by a stranger (63 percent of violent victimizations) . . . ." J. Friedman, J. Valenti, Yes Means Yes: Visions of Female Sexual Power and A World Without Rape at 23 (2008). PC …
/r/MensRights26/01/15 06:24 PM
1

Wow, Zimba, that's a great comment even for you. You made my day.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 02:24 PM
2

Good find -- will check it out. Aside from your point, we know this study is anything but reliable. If we're going to accept this study as indicative of college men despite it's incredibly dubious methodology, then we HAVE to accept Prof. Kanin's study because, flaws and all, it is still more scientific than this dreck. So, if one of three college men would rape if there were no consequences, then let's also say that 41-50% of all college women who claim they were rape were lying. http://falsera…
/r/MensRights23/01/15 02:22 PM
3

Most people would probably give a 12 or higher to committing murder, much less rape.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 02:15 PM
2

First, due process never attached in the criminal context. There wasn't enough evidence to charge him. Second, he was cleared in the college tribunal, but I am loathe to say he was afforded "due process" there -- that would go against everything we preach at COTWA. An accurate headline would be: "New York Senator Kirsten Gillibrand should resign for branding a college student a rapist when even his college's kangaroo court cleared him" -- but the uninitiated would have no idea what we were talki…
/r/MensRights23/01/15 02:03 PM
14

When you call the accuser the "victim," you are assuming he is a rapist. The injustice is this kind of rush to judgment.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 11:51 AM
9

It's the actual title of the article I posted. You would do well to actually read the article before commenting.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 11:49 AM
8

It's the title of the article I posted. You would do well to actually read the article before commenting.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 11:48 AM
7

It's the title of the article I posted. You would do well to actually read the article before commenting.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 11:48 AM
11

Another potential solution to this: she should resign.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 02:07 AM
22

SHE came to a unilateral conclusion without affording him due process.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 02:06 AM
8

No. Can you keep your opinion out of my thread?
/r/MensRights23/01/15 02:05 AM
14

That sort of sums the insanity!
/r/MensRights22/01/15 01:12 PM
19

It's radical feminist gobbledygook to support a world view that men are evil.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 02:59 PM
1

There are links all over the place.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 04:11 AM
5

We're here speaking up for the wrongly accused. Heaven knows, a European shouldn't be lecturing us on that subject!
/r/MensRights10/01/15 12:03 AM
6

Men don't sit the way feminists want them to. Men don't pee the way feminists want them to. Men don't walk down the street the way feminists want them to. At some point, you have to wonder: is it approximately 50% of planet that is inherently flawed, or could it be . . . the tiny percentage of feminist kooks who come up with these inane criticisms?
/r/MensRights09/01/15 10:06 PM
9

Yeah. She was probably covering his mouth because he knew too much. I agree with you.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 08:14 PM
10

I agree with you. I'd add this: I would not be surprised if he didn't really believe her about the rape -- perhaps he beat the guy to death to punish her, primarily, and him. I hope they both spend a long time away for this one.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 05:26 PM
10

It's simply wrong.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 02:39 PM
1

He's a titan of criminal jurisprudence. He has a lot of anti-Semitic detractors.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 02:05 PM
3

Doesn't count when women do it.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 01:27 PM
5

Here's a word to describe all of it: Man-hating. And it is fomented by angry young female writers who can't get a job doing anything productive.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 01:27 PM
0

He's a great advocate for the folks I speak for.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 12:31 PM
2

The answer: http://www.cotwa.info/2013/02/the-case-for-anonymity-for-men-and-boys.html
/r/MensRights08/01/15 03:26 AM
1

My article on Brian Banks: http://www.cotwa.info/2012/06/bygones-be-bygones-unspeakable.html
/r/MensRights05/01/15 12:18 PM
2

You can only use that level of force necessary to defend yourself.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 01:20 AM
48

Finally, a fair fight. Don't be surprised if Alan outs this accuser.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 09:28 PM
13

The news account reveals she's guilty of assault. The question is whether his punch was in self-defense (e.g., was it proportional, etc.). Men do have the right to defend themselves even though they are, you know, men.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 08:55 PM
2

He makes our job a lot more difficult than it should be.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 08:51 PM
6

Here's what one expert liar explained: All this was inspired by the principle—which is quite true within itself—that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in littl…
/r/MensRights01/01/15 10:22 PM
7

All due respect, the author is not entirely correct. I couldn't care less about blowing my own horn, but my blog, COTWA, on more occasions than I can chronicle, first advanced ideas that were soon picked up by mainstream media writers. Twice in the past few weeks, it almost made me laugh how posts of mine were "adopted" by these folks. I believe my blog is exceptional, and that most similar blogs are more rants than anything else, but it can't be denied that there is a small tidal wave of backla…
/r/MensRights01/01/15 01:30 PM
1

As I said in the post, for the first time since the onslaught started, prominent voices with no stake in the issue are saying, "slow down." From the perspective of someone who follows the issue as closely as anyone, I can tell you there is reason to hope.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 01:12 PM
3

You are way too kind, SwanOfAvon22. Thanks.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 11:51 PM
1

My problem is that I start from the assumption that everyone here knows how reasonable I am from my blog -- our Mission statement: "Every civilized society must strive to eradicate heinous criminality by punishing offenders, but it also must insure that the innocent aren't punished with them. The latter concern typically is absent from the public discourse. . . . ."
/r/MensRights31/12/14 12:26 AM
2

You may not even realize you're doing it, but when you refer to accusers as "victims," that shows a bias. I once got the New York Times to change a story on line because of that very thing. Then you make clear that you don't think false rape claims are a problem, so you pretty much think I am blowing it out of proportion. I think that, like a lot of feminists, you have made an assumption that isn't warranted. I do not think false rape claims are an epidemic. But to the feminists who dominate the…
/r/MensRights30/12/14 10:37 PM
2

Wait, wait, wait. I know damn well I am not talking about the majority of women, or the majority of women who seek gender equality. I get it, okay? The vast majority of people, including women, agree with those 28 Harvard law profs. I am talking about the radical feminists, for example, at NOW and the Dept. of Education, and their media enablers (e.g., Jessica Valenti) who dominate the public discourse on this subject. My position is mainstream. If you put it to a vote, pretty much everything I'…
/r/MensRights30/12/14 09:35 PM
2

I both laugh and cringe every time I see one of your blanket assertions, your righteous feminist ipse dixit. Substance, please, madam. Leave your feminist idiocy at home. P.S. How many identities do you have on Reddit?
/r/MensRights30/12/14 09:25 PM
2

Okay, College man, you don't think it's a problem so that's why you think that I (not to mention 28 Harvard law profs -- one of whom was an Obama mentor -- and too many others to chronicle) are blowing it out of proportion, right? Do you even understand the "process" that your school will employ against you if you are accused of a sex offense? Seriously? Do you understand that you won't be allowed to have an attorney speak for you at most colleges? That your school can find you responsible for r…
/r/MensRights30/12/14 09:22 PM
2

"Mr. Dude" to you, madam. Show me ONE feminist who is prominent on the issue of rape who thinks false rape claims are a serious problem and that presumptively innocent college men need to have far greater protections. ONE.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 09:10 PM
2

Substance, please. Show me one feminist who thinks false rape claims are a serious problem. One.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 09:08 PM
2

P.S. Let's talk substance. Stop stomping your foot and insisting "YOU'RE WRONG!" Show me one mainstream feminist who wants to stop the war on due process when it comes to men accused of sexual assault in American colleges. Show me one mainstream feminist who thinks false rape claims are a real problem that need to be addressed. One.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 09:00 PM
1

No, I am standing up for the wrongly accused, madam. On the other hand, you and your ilk, who are so terribly hostile to due process for dreaded college men, would feel quite comfortable in the shade of the hanging trees of the Old South.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 08:58 PM
1

Thanks for the non sequitur. If you'd care to discuss the actual substance of any of the points, aside from just saying "you're wrong!" then let's do it. Otherwise, stop trolling here.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 08:41 PM
2

Do all feminists have a hissy fit when someone holds a mirror up to them? Go troll somewhere else.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 08:28 PM
2

I am just repeating what folks a lot smarter than you have said. You are unschooled on these issues and obviously don't like to hear the truth when it comes to your ideology. Sorry, sometimes the truth hurts.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 08:26 PM
2

Um, yeah. Well, here's some advice. Ditch the Women's Studies class this semester, and take a class on basic logic. You argue like a 15 year old.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 02:31 PM
1

Is the child in the last panel a boy or a girl? This guy was washed up in the Ford administration.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 01:05 PM
2

I hear what you're saying, but she went beyond what even the usual suspects do. Watch, the rest of the sexual grievance industry will start saying it, too, and as with every other lie these people tell, it will become the truth by the mere fact that it's repeated over and over.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 01:02 PM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 12:31 PM
1

Sadly, the young nitwits put the current regime in the White House.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 12:24 PM
3

You whitewash troubling behavior. The sexual grievance industry has used the one in five to scare the hell out of women and parents of women going to college. They rammed all manner of awful legislation down our throats by fomenting a public outcry. If the number was, in fact, more than ten times less than that, the American public had a right to know it.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 12:24 PM
2

Yeah, well, "mate," the problem isn't that it's "common" -- I couldn't give a flying fuck how common it is (actually, it's more common than you silly feminists think: http://www.cotwa.info/2013/01/the-enliven-projects-truth-about-false.html) -- the problem is that you folks have made it way too easy to find innocent students guilty. That's not my opinion, that's the consensus of lots of people lots smarter than me (and certainly lots and lots smarter than you). The Harvard profs weren't protesti…
/r/MensRights30/12/14 04:46 AM
1

Unfortunately, the dopes are influencing policy and making life miserable for the innocent. Otherwise I couldn't care less what they think.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 04:39 AM
3

We've written about the prevalence of false rape claims many times. E.g., here: http://www.cotwa.info/2013/01/the-enliven-projects-truth-about-false.html The two percent canard has been discredited everywhere. As for rape not being taken seriously, it's more likely that accusations of rape are taken too seriously, and men are convicted in the court of public opinion too readily -- sometimes with disastrous consequences: http://www.cotwa.info/2013/11/can-we-please-ditch-simple-minded.html The "De…
/r/MensRights30/12/14 03:29 AM
3

I love it.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 10:08 PM
3

Okay, let them prove it The problem is, they've proven time and time again that they don't mean it. To place hope in their good will is not rational.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 10:08 PM
3

"Rape" is not sex.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 10:05 PM
12

They are nitwits, and it has nothing to do with their alleged sexual inexperience (which, by the way, is inconsistent with the hook-up culture). It has to do with their naivete in jumping on every PC notion that comes down the pike, including the "one in five" and rape culture lies. These folks will believe anything if it has a "victim" in the story. By the way, the levels of drinking and libertine sex on campus is astounding, a sad symptom of the collapse of traditional values. You say they are…
/r/MensRights29/12/14 07:18 PM
15

Right. When I wrote that, I figured the Generation of Nitwits wouldn't get it.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 06:28 PM
56

I am at the point where I cringe whenever I see the name "Tyler Kingkade." Here's the reality: you can't be punitive with a weak standard of proof and loose evidentiary safeguards. You can only be punitive when you know your decision is right and that the student is a rapist. Can't have it both ways, Tyler.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 05:03 PM
4

You mean it's an embarrassing violation? And that's a reason to shield everyone's name?
/r/MensRights29/12/14 05:00 PM
7

Excellent.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 04:26 PM
1

The Comins quote is one we reference a lot at COTWA, and Koss -- what can I say?
/r/MensRights29/12/14 03:19 PM
-4

Seems like way too many actual rapes.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 03:12 PM
1

My list was confined to 2014 quotes.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 03:03 PM
5

I cite this a lot at COTWA, as you can imagine.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 04:06 AM
2

If you are interested in the real reasons for underreporting, here is what the head of RAINN said: http://www.cotwa.info/2010/11/sexual-grievance-industry-bigwig-under.html But congratulations! You did accurately cite from the feminist playbook on the subject -- even if it's not factual. Further, the "handful" of feminists you reference are the ones who dominate public policy with respect to the issues I write about. Perhaps your girlfriend could convince her fellow feminists to ditch the man-ha…
/r/MensRights29/12/14 04:04 AM
2

You know what? I don't give a damn whether there are thousands of "good" feminists, including all the ones you know and date -- the ones who dominate the public discourse, and foment public outcries, with regard to the issues I deal with have institutionalized hostility to due process when it comes to men and sex offenses. My blog, COTWA, has chronicled their idiocy, and you would do well to study the issues before defending "feminism": http://www.cotwa.info/2014/12/most-hateful-quotes-of-2014.h…
/r/MensRights29/12/14 03:27 AM
3

Amen.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 01:15 AM
12

Another law professor calls bullshit on the feminist manifesto: http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2014/12/14/campus-rape-uva-crisis-rolling-stone-politics-column/20397277/
/r/MensRights28/12/14 03:54 PM
1

Just a friendly comment. Don't be so certain you know what the real number is, because I've been studying this for years and I have no idea other than to say it's nowhere near one in five.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 03:32 PM
1

The answer is obvious to those who follow the issue closely. I wrote about it here: http://www.cotwa.info/2014/12/the-rolling-stone-debacle-didnt-happen.html
/r/MensRights23/12/14 03:41 AM
1

The only thing that matters is whether anything Jackie claimed to be true is, in fact, true. I mean anything at all. Enough focus on Rolling Stone, and the lousy job it did.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 11:32 PM
8

Right. Under their definitions, pretty much everyone has committed, and has been the victim of, sexual assault. That means, of course, that the surveys are neither helpful nor accurate.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 10:09 PM
3

You are exactly right, the most important issue is how we respond to it. But the issue under consideration here is how often it happens. Please understand, this isn't an issue that I created, it's an issue that the sexual grievance industry thinks is of paramount importance. They manufactured the 1 in 5 stat to prove there is an epidemic of sexual assault on campus that requires drastic measures. These drastic measures include chipping away at the due process rights of students accused of sexual…
/r/MensRights22/12/14 09:39 PM
1

Let's say it's closer to the truth, but it may not be anywhere near the real number. As we've written many times at COTWA, all of these studies -- including the new one -- credits every assertion of sexual assault (defined, incidentally, in an overly broad manner) as an actual sexual assault. That can't possibly be accurate. When sexual assaults are actually reported, investigated, and tested against competing evidence of innocence, the majority can't be said to be actual assaults or non-assault…
/r/MensRights22/12/14 07:22 PM
4

Yes, the Senator still has a ways to go before she gets it right.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 05:33 PM
3

There is a hostility to due process on campus when it comes to men accused of sex offenses. Need a "credible" source? How about: 28 (mainly liberal) Harvard law professors: http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2014/10/14/rethink-harvard-sexual-harassment-policy/HFDDiZN7nU2UwuUuWMnqbM/story.html; and law professors from Yale: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/16/opinion/sunday/mishandling-rape.html?_r=5 and George Washington University: http://www.cotwa.info/2014/07/illegals-crossing-border-have-more.…
/r/MensRights22/12/14 03:07 AM
1

I am sure it was under the guise that women are disproportionately shut out of these press conferences, so today, he's going to give them a boost. The implication is that they are shut because they are women, and women aren't given the respect they deserve etc. Again, the evidence for that is based solely on outcomes, not opportunity.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 10:47 PM
2

Reminds me of when the quiz show Jeopardy has its round for kids-only -- it only underscores that the group being highlighted needs "special" advantages to fit in.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 09:59 PM
5

A huge percentage can't be attributed as true or false.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 09:55 PM
24

"The false dichotomy between care for survivors and care for the accused’s rights does a disservice to the policy debate and all those involved." It's simply not true that feminism has been or is much concerned about the rights of presumptively innocent college students accused of sex offense. In fact, there's plenty of evidence to suggest that feminists are downright hostile to ANY such concerns. Need proof? http://www.cotwa.info/2014/12/most-hateful-quotes-of-2014.html I started an entire blog…
/r/MensRights19/12/14 09:31 PM
7

Apples and oranges. Telling women not to get raped has nothing to do with teaching our children about the sanctity of crying "rape." Not only are we NOT teaching that, the feminist manifesto encourages loosely using the word "rape," engorging it beyond all recognition. The Rolling Stone debacle proves we do our daughters no favors when women lie about rape. Time Magazine famously wrote: "Catherine Comins, assistant dean of student life at Vassar, also sees some value in this loose use of 'rape.'…
/r/MensRights18/12/14 01:48 PM
6

http://www.cotwa.info/2014/12/most-hateful-quotes-of-2014.html
/r/MensRights18/12/14 03:36 AM
3

This writer likely couldn't get a job doing anything productive if her life depended on it.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 03:30 AM
6

I was trying to figure that out -- I see where the girls and boys were schooled in separate buildings. Do you have a citation that says this?
/r/MensRights16/12/14 02:57 PM
17

I agree. The Primal Screamers make no pretense that their event is anything more than mindless blowing off steam. In my mind, they have more integrity than the sanctimonious PC warriors who have a hissy fit when the students they are disrupting don't approve. And this is from someone who is still shaking his head over Eric Garner: http://www.cotwa.info/2014/12/killing-eric-garner.html
/r/MensRights16/12/14 01:39 PM
2

It's comments like this that make me keep pushing the issue. Thanks, cuteman.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 05:16 PM
3

You are way too kind. Thank you.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 07:01 PM
2

http://www.cotwa.info/2014/12/003-in-5.html
/r/MensRights12/12/14 05:13 PM
4

"One kid kicked at his sister and knocked her off her bike . . . ." Come on now. You know this is what happened, do you? Because someone claimed it happened. The real villain in the tale wasn't the Village Idiot who happens to be Vice President, it's his idiot father who tacitly encouraged vigilantism.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 05:10 PM
11

Vigilante Joe! So much for due process, the rule of law, and giving both sides an opportunity to present their sides of the story. This incident from Joe's youth was a good precursor to his present day sexual assault crusade, with all its attendant hostility to due process.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 04:59 PM
2

"I think these sorts of mental contortions are what enables things like this to continue." You said it better than I could!
/r/MensRights12/12/14 12:00 PM
1

This is a game changer: http://www.cotwa.info/2014/12/003-in-5.html
/r/MensRights12/12/14 01:24 AM
6

http://www.cotwa.info/2014/12/003-in-5.html
/r/MensRights12/12/14 01:23 AM
2

Thanks, DuusieDos -- it's fixed.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 01:15 AM
11

Thanks for posting it -- even Scott Berkowitz of RAINN is quoted as casting doubt on the one-in-five.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 12:46 AM
2

I am saying be respectful and keep an open mind. It has been a major them of my blog for many years that the news media does not report rape properly -- it is too quick to convict. Prime example: Hofstra. Watch the video, then read my story about what really happened: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6EmbZ1X3M5w http://www.cotwa.info/p/lambs-to-slaughter-hofstra-false-rape.html
/r/MensRights12/12/14 12:37 AM
8

". . . a story meant to demonstrate the seriousness of the campus rape problem has become an accidental narrative about lying feminists." http://spectator.org/articles/61215/rolling-stones-journalism-synecdoche
/r/MensRights11/12/14 11:19 PM
1

It's the Ebola scare all over again.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 11:19 PM
1

The good news is there are very few of them.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 10:56 PM
3

". . . there was no reason not to believe her when the story was published." Those of us who follow the issue know that this is just wrong.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 06:58 PM
24

There is no college rape epidemic and there is no "rape culture" in the sense the feminists mean.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 06:56 PM
1

Yeah. Clickbait -- for the Washington Post. Right.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 11:54 AM
2

George Costanza: "Jerry, just remember, it's not a lie if you believe it."
/r/MensRights11/12/14 11:52 AM
1

Perfect.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 05:18 AM
22

And then she sat down and told her lie to Rolling Stone.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 03:33 AM
28

This is absolutely devastating to "Jackie's" supporters. I actually felt sick to my stomach reading it because it is so very frightening that huge segments of the populace automatically believed her.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 12:10 AM
4

Round and round we go. "Jackie's" story is full of holes. Sorry you can't listen to reason.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 02:13 PM
5

This is a common lament of mine. For the first time in memory, groups historically at the forefront in fighting to preserve the due process rights of Americans whenever they were in danger of being taken away are working to roll back due process rights in a significant and blatant way -- but only with respect to young college men (predominantly white) accused of sex offenses. Their fealty to group identity politics trumps their devotion to due process.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 01:07 PM
3

Your assumption that "Jackie" was sexually assaulted, and that her purported "trauma" is likely from a sexual assault, are posited with no authority beyond your serene ipse dixit. For many years my blog has chronicled all manner of cases where rape claims accompanied by apparent "trauma" turned out to be prevarications, sometimes with horrifying consequences for the men and boys wrongly accused. The current hostility to due process on campus, and the attendant erosion of rights of young men accu…
/r/MensRights10/12/14 12:57 PM
1

Your comment ignores a fact Prof. Dershowitz raised. These are not "private" crimes -- there is no such thing. If a rape occurs, odds are the rapist will do it to other women. We need to end the stigma of treating rape as a "different" sort of crime with all the shaming baggage.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 12:42 PM
6

In a case where you or someone close to you is falsely accused of rape, would you want the information to be public? Do you know what can happen when it's known that someone is accused of rape? I've written extensively about it: http://www.cotwa.info/2013/11/can-we-please-ditch-simple-minded.html Now, in response to YOUR question, Prof. Alan Dershowitz, a titan of criminal law, has made a persuasive case against anonymity. Here's what he wrote about one high profile rape case: "The prosecution p…
/r/MensRights10/12/14 11:57 AM
3

This is becoming a trend with the Times.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 11:55 PM
3

Wow, you are way too kind, CellularPeptideCake! Thanks.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 11:27 PM
2

You are way too kind, whinemoreplease. I grow weary of the drive-by experts and Reddit police who cock their heads and issue a pronouncement as if they know anything. Thanks for your support!
/r/MensRights09/12/14 11:26 PM
1

cuteman, I am going to compile such a list.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 11:23 PM
2

Tell me something I don't know.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 11:22 PM
3

CDC did nothing more than parrot a dreaded survey, the same as virtually all the other studies. Even Kanin has more credibility than CDC. The problems with the questions in these surveys is well known, and Hoff-Sommers and a dozen others beat that drum all the time. The problem I raise is more serious, and much more obvious. To repeat: no study -- get it? NO STUDY -- of rape claims that are actually reported, investigated, and tested against competing claims (and evidence) of innocence has ever …
/r/MensRights09/12/14 11:19 PM
2

"Advertising"? You just gave me the best chuckle of the week. What I do is a public service. I have never made a dime off it. Truth be told, I indicate that I am the blogger at COTWA solely to dispel newbies from "explaining" false rape claims to me, that's all (mainly rad feminists who frequent this site). I can't stand debating folks with strong opinions and little schooling on the issue. If it offended you, I don't really know what to say except that I am apt to do things like that from time …
/r/MensRights09/12/14 10:45 PM
5

Excellent.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 09:02 PM
8

Yes.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 08:20 PM
6

Interesting non-response. Not sure how someone loses credibility by advising people to read the leading blog dedicated to giving voice to the wrongly accused. Do you have a real opinion here that you'd like to, ah, debate with me? Let me guess: you just stop by trolling.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 08:18 PM
8

Love it.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 08:16 PM
8

If this is accurate, I am sick to my stomach, but, no, not surprised.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 07:05 PM
6

I did a post on this subject one time: http://www.cotwa.info/2014/01/there-needs-to-be-national-conversation.html
/r/MensRights09/12/14 07:00 PM
1

He long ago strayed from the land of reason.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 04:34 PM
9

They are delusional.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 11:58 PM
13

They had a conniption when RAINN wrote to the White House and urged it to ditch the "rape culture" crap. RAINN's letter was much more forceful, and well written, than anything COTWA ever wrote on the subject, yet COTWA is deemed a "hate" site.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 08:08 PM
20

It is rage that keeps me going on this issue, baskandpurr. I think we need to start confronting, in a very direct way, the fact that it's the "rape culture" bullshit that is fueling a lot of the injustices on campus and elsewhere.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 07:26 PM
16

Yep, heard that. And RAINN is a cause of "rape culture" since it says talking about "rape culture" is "unfortunate."
/r/MensRights08/12/14 07:09 PM
24

Joint Statement of the North-American Interfraternity Conference, the National Panhellenic Conference, which represents sororities, and the Fraternity and Sorority Political Action Committee: ". . . we call on the University of Virginia to immediately reinstate operations for all fraternity and sorority organizations on campus, to issue an apology for its actions of the last two weeks, to publicly explain and release all records for the basis of its decision to suspend our organizations, and out…
/r/MensRights08/12/14 06:43 PM
12

This is the final word on the subject.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 03:43 PM
1

I agree with you.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 12:41 PM
1

"I'm not overjoyed that there no rape at all . . . ." I am always glad if there wasn't a rape. I am not glad we live in a culture that touts rapes that didn't happen (and that occurs all too frequently).
/r/MensRights08/12/14 10:13 AM
3

Even now, Rolling Stone has learned nothing -- doesn't it realize that it got in trouble in the first place because of its dishonesty? Why compound it with more dishonesty? And worse -- not only dishonest, it treats "Jackie" as a child. Based on the discrepancies in the story, "Jackie" is either a liar or severely disturbed. It is anti-intellectual to continue to maintain she was raped.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 02:18 AM
7

Big name legal scholar.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 03:56 AM
3

The 2 to 8 percent is a distortion -- even using feminist-approved analyses: http://www.cotwa.info/2013/01/the-enliven-projects-truth-about-false.html
/r/MensRights07/12/14 03:53 AM
31

Yes, yes, yes. The reactions from the usual suspects are predictable, and we'll see a lot more next week. But they'll blame: the fraternity; Rolling Stone; "rape apologists" who never believed "Jackie"; and men's righters. The one person they won't blame for this debacle is "Jackie" because she is entitled to unconditional belief even if the magazine says she isn't.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 12:53 AM
2

Tell them to add these to the list: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2nzdz8/poll_which_is_the_most_hateful_comment_of_the_year/
/r/MensRights05/12/14 11:44 PM
2

sillymod, I appreciate your vote of confidence. I am accustomed to name-calling -- from a Harvard sociology prof. to the SPLC. Funny, they never want to engage me on the issues, they just start calling me names . . . .
/r/MensRights05/12/14 08:10 PM
1

Such a tragedy.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 01:34 AM
1

Yeah, I agree.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 11:21 PM
1

Wow!!
/r/MensRights04/12/14 11:21 PM
2

The video tape proves that the cops covered up what happened. This tape is going to lead to reforms that Ferguson never could. The City of New York has already announced reforms, and Atty. Gen'l. Holder is stepping in now.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 11:20 PM
44

In the interest of fair advertising, the feminists should have another sign -- this one telling people that men are 10 times more likely to die from eating the baked goods. Men get paid more, but men account for over 90 percent of work-related fatalities. And that's not even to mention the fact that men work longer hours and take far less time away from the work force to raise children.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 03:14 PM
7

Here's the irony: it isn't "men's rights advocates" who devolve into such pettiness about words, it's feminists. My favorite recent example: the sociology professor who said that use of the word "seminal" is "blatantly sexist" and "perpetuate[s] inequalities or marginalization." http://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2014/04/21/dont-say-seminal-its-sexist/
/r/MensRights04/12/14 12:40 PM
177

The folks who don't care about this disparity should not be heard to question why fathers aren't more involved in their children's lives, or why men earn more money than women who drop out of the job market for a time to raise children.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 12:14 PM
1

I suggest that you trust that I read it. She destroyed all the good will she'd built up with my blog with her loopy conclusion. And trust me, no one was a bigger fan than me.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 10:55 PM
8

It is sexist to attribute behavioral changes to a woman's period, isn't it?
/r/MensRights03/12/14 02:41 PM
3

Through COTWA I've learned that sometimes being falsely accused of rape is about the worst thing that can happen to someone. We trivialize their harm by playing Oppression Olympics.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 11:53 AM
2

Who said "harshly" punished?
/r/MensRights03/12/14 04:37 AM
5

While I don't necessarily agree with you, I appreciate your point of view and I upvote you for it. I do think that in this, the prison capital of the world, we need to start changing attitudes about automatic custodial sentences for crime.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 12:03 AM
8

http://www.cotwa.info/2013/10/the-horrific-consequences-of-false-rape.html
/r/MensRights02/12/14 11:42 PM
7

Same for young men who commit sexual assault, right?
/r/MensRights02/12/14 11:28 PM
7

The downvotes are due to the fact that you come off like a jackass.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 10:56 PM
6

She's been saying this sort of thing for years: police don't take rape seriously, but they prosecute false rape claims.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 10:54 PM
8

Here's the reality. In case after case after case, if there is any doubt, women are not charged with anything. It's typically only in ironclad cases that charges are brought, and there has to be evidence beyond a retraction.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 10:53 PM
7

I get it. Fuck the Innocence Project, right, feminist? Yeah, you have a lot of credibility. Okay. Here's some recent mainstream stuff. Boston Globe -- 28 Harvard law profs (almost all liberals and including an Obama mentor) used language more forceful than COTWA ever could: http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2014/10/14/rethink-harvard-sexual-harassment-policy/HFDDiZN7nU2UwuUuWMnqbM/story.html Yale Law Prof. Rubenfeld in the New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/16/opinion/sunday/mishand…
/r/MensRights02/12/14 10:49 PM
8

Please, stop! Just stop! Go troll somewhere else. You have anger issues and the self-righteousness is breathtaking. It is folks like you that engender disrepute of feminism. And if you think the Innocence Project is in the habit of endorsing loony men's rights pieces, you are truly delusional -- go read it: http://www.cotwa.info/2012/06/bygones-be-bygones-unspeakable.html http://www.cotwa.info/p/lambs-to-slaughter-hofstra-false-rape.html
/r/MensRights02/12/14 09:53 PM
6

COTWA agrees with you. A prosecutor should not take a case of this nature unless he was certain to a moral certainty of guilt. Same for rape.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 08:46 PM
8

Tell me, then, what the Petition asked for. In all fairness. They aren't happy that so many cases are prosecuted, yet we demonstrated that hardly any are prosecuted. What does that leave? And, wow, the 90 percent stat is made up from whole cloth.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 08:23 PM
6

Can't force myself to read your comment with care, and it's not worthy of serious refutation because you are terribly unschooled in the issues. (Your comment that "victims are often unfairly lumped into the, again very rare, group of false accusers" is laughable since it is posited without any authority beyond your angry ipse dixit.) Your self-righteousness is a little scary, I must say. In any event, here are some links to good primers on the issues. Start with these and then maybe you will hav…
/r/MensRights02/12/14 08:18 PM
1

I liked the article.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 07:47 PM
3

You may be correct about WAR's goal, but the language of their petition suggests they believe any prosecution is an affront to rape survivors.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 07:43 PM
3

My guess is they are fine with what happens in any other setting, but rape is different.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 07:28 PM
9

Thanks for the libel. The link you furnished is not what we linked to in our post. Here's the exact quote from the link we provided. “In the course of my research I have not found any country that pursues these cases against women rape complainants in the way the UK does. The UK has an unusual approach and I think their approach violates human rights,” she said. Your inane rant fails to address in any respect the unjust position espoused by these rape victims' advocates. Instead of chiding me fo…
/r/MensRights02/12/14 06:56 PM
3

Yeah, that one is truly hateful.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 03:14 AM
3

It is beyond me why groups like that feel the need to be so over-the-top.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 11:23 PM
5

I think that's my choice, too.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 11:22 PM
22

This post is not about the Cosby case. We can't classify the Cosby case more than what I've already done -- the allegations are a matter of concern and they raises questions. We certainly would not say these are false claims. The post is about extending statutes of limitations in ways that hurt the wrongly accused. The Cosby case is an excuse for gender zealots to advocate eliminating statutes of limitations. I write about this a lot at COTWA.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 05:28 PM
7

You've missed the point of the post.The point of the post is that statutes of limitations are essential to protect innocent people.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 05:14 PM
6

"The derailing implication of 'too,' and the presumptuous attitude that feminists (or anyone for that matter) will ignore the male side to things is a big problem in the world of social justice." Bullshit. They DO ignore the "male side of things" -- case in point, what I do at COTWA: http://www.cotwa.info/
/r/MensRights22/11/14 08:20 PM
2

I think you make a legitimate point. The older I get, the less sure of myself I am.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 08:03 PM
6

You're way too kind, but thanks.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 09:01 PM
6

". . . the general public has failed to take the stories seriously." I don't understand what writers like this expect the public to do in the face of these accusations. Assume Cosby's guilt? He's never been afforded due process to rebut these alleged offenses. Even if we suspect he's guilty, what do we do? "But it's deeper than that. We live in a society where even the most ordinary and anonymous of accused rapists is offered the benefit of social and legal doubt." This is a bad thing? Marc Lamo…
/r/MensRights21/11/14 08:09 PM
10

I can certainly understand your point of view, and you might be right. The way I see it, many of these folks know that taking this position is going to bring them a lot of heat (the Yale law professor has been challenged, or attacked -- depending on how you view it -- by 75 of his own students). George Will was practically destroyed when he recently made some of the same points. Brett Sokolow and RAINN are viewed as traitors or at the very least "wrong" for taking moderate positions on some of t…
/r/MensRights21/11/14 07:55 PM
12

I respectfully disagree. The law profs who are now speaking out typically side with due process on everything. I think that their late arrival to this party is indicative of the fact that this wasn't very prominent on anyone's radar (aside from us and a handful of other people -- I can literally name the ones who made a big deal out of this five years ago), until lately -- until some over-zealous people at the Dept. of Education became draconian about it.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 07:07 PM
2

I write about this a lot: http://www.cotwa.info/2013/12/root-cause-of-rape-and-false-rape.html P.S. "From what I've read from many different sources and studies, a more accurate assessment seems to be roughly 10%." Not necessarily: http://www.cotwa.info/2013/01/the-enliven-projects-truth-about-false.html
/r/MensRights21/11/14 03:01 PM
10

The gender thought police are quick to attack anyone who publicly says what the vast majority of women think and believe. Which tells us all we need to know about the gender thought police.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 02:20 PM
9

Excellent observation. And dead on.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 02:01 PM
19

"This is the most visual manifestation of patriarchal privilege." The fact that this is all they have to complain about tells us not only that gender equality, more or less, has been achieved, but that they are loons.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 01:11 PM
1

I'd be happy with the same evidentiary protections that are provided in CIVIL proceedings, the preponderance of the evidence standard notwithstanding. Many supporters of the current system point out that a student disciplinary hearing is a "only" a civil matter, not a criminal one, and therefore the preponderance standard is appropriate. The folks who chant that line don't seem to understand that in civil cases, the defendant is afforded all manner of evidentiary protections that colleges routin…
/r/MensRights20/11/14 11:23 PM
2

This is an invaluable resource, Jonathan. Keep up the great work.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 11:19 PM
3

If a couple of Circuit Courts held that schools aren't providing sufficient due process, schools would react accordingly. The one thing that trumps the academy's fealty to group identity politics is its fear of litigation.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 06:02 PM
8

Well, what can and should happen is for the courts to intervene. These are Constitutional, not political, questions. If a few of these current suits by expelled male students come out the right way, that will cause universities to moderate their policies.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 03:12 PM
23

It follows quickly on the heels of the op-ed by the Yale law professor last weekend. Those of us who follow this issue closely recognized the Harvard law professors' letter (signed by 28 law profs) as a massively important turning point. Their condemnation of the Harvard sex policy (Prof. Alan Dershowitz suggested it was really a condemnation of the Obama college sex policies) was harsher and far more effective than anything I've ever written at Community of the Wrongly Accused. For years, sites…
/r/MensRights20/11/14 01:38 PM
1

I've written about the study I reference in the title many times. E.g.: http://www.cotwa.info/2013/01/the-enliven-projects-truth-about-false.html
/r/MensRights19/11/14 09:24 PM
10

Yeah, well, that's not what happened.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 02:45 AM
2

If someone "consents" after drinking, it's not rape if she's not incapacitated. If she's incapacitated, her "consent" is not legally operative. The intoxicated/incapacitated difference is a big issue that we write about a lot at my blog. http://www.cotwa.info/
/r/MensRights18/11/14 11:36 PM
0

Ugh. Wait, wait, wait. It's rape if the woman is incapacitated and is not able to consent whether she says so later or not. The problem with "it's on us" is that it shifts the responsibility not to rape from the rapist to innocent bystanders.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 10:13 PM
1

No, feminists are engaged in group identity politics, and traditional liberal ideals are not applicable to them. As I've explained at www.cotwa.info, the feminist hostility to due process has had the perverse effect of allying so-called progressives with law and order conservatives who typically have fought the expansion of due process rights at every turn.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 09:17 PM
4

Right.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 08:23 PM
2

11: Their blatant hostility to due process when it comes to men accused of sex offenses.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 08:22 PM
3

Unfortunately, reader, extremist feminists hostile to due process dominate the public discourse about the issue I write about, so it's unavoidable. http://www.cotwa.info/2014/11/jessica-valenti-brands-yale-law-prof.html and http://www.cotwa.info/2014/11/add-these-to-misandry-hall-of-fame.html
/r/MensRights18/11/14 07:47 PM
1

Great comment. Absolutely right.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 07:33 PM
3

Yes.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 03:23 PM
5

http://www.cotwa.info/2014/11/jessica-valenti-brands-yale-law-prof.html
/r/MensRights18/11/14 01:55 PM
6

I think you're right. And they'll prove it (yet again) by not denouncing Jessica Valenti's latest hate.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 01:54 PM
14

The guy was wearing a shirt made for him by his close female friend. Was he wearing it on his big day as a tribute to his friend the way we've all done with some piece of apparel given to us as a gift that doesn't mean much to us? In any event, his taste is questionable, and the company's dress code policy may need to be revised, but to read "misogyny" into his motives is decidedly unfair and a little mind-boggling. Put it this way: the fact that hurt feminist feelings trump the story of the com…
/r/MensRights17/11/14 09:24 PM
2

FOR THE LIFE OF ME, I can't understand how the news media is still differentiating between "women" civilians and plain old civilians. And no one, except the people here, call them on it. Newsflash, dummies: this is 2014. Time to ditch the double-standards.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 08:06 PM
30

Why let the truth get in the way of a good feminist narrative? Trust me, you will see people refer to this video as if the men were not duped.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 08:03 PM
1

This ninny is not approximating any real world conduct, she's making fun of random men as a sort of twisted feminist gender get-evenism. She's a smug idiot who has a friend with a camera. Next?
/r/MensRights13/11/14 08:00 PM
7

I write COTWA -- http://www.cotwa.info/ -- and have been following this issue closely for years. Being in a committed relationship reduces the chances of a false rape claim to the point that they are virtually non-existent.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 08:14 PM
5

Oh, my, oh, my. These folks insult our intelligence with this nonsense.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 02:02 PM
119

I can use this at http://www.cotwa.info: You say that "only" 8 percent of rape claims are false? Imagine a bowl of M&Ms, and "only" 8 percent are poison. Go ahead. Eat a handful.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 06:24 PM
1

Don't female models get paid more than male models? Have you ever heard men complain about that?
/r/MensRights05/11/14 05:34 PM
7

Your friend will likely need or want to retain a contingent fee attorney, and if the would-be defendant does not have significant resources, or if the case involves a "he said-she said" dispute, that may be difficult to do. In addition, a lot of men are not interested in having a public hearing about an allegation where they were accused of a heinous sex crime. I write a blog devoted to the wrongly accused and think it's great, but it's rare to see these sorts of suits.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 10:46 PM
18

What school? And what is the purpose of this change?
/r/MensRights03/11/14 09:29 PM
6

The problem is that this absolves everyone of the blame for the mess that is the inner city -- the "man out of the house" rule, and similar awful ideas, helped decimate an already fragile culture. Thank Lyndon Johnson et al for not thinking it through properly in the mid-60s.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 07:33 PM
2

President Obama acknowledges, in no uncertain terms, the problems to the black community caused by the absence of fathers. Black people have never had the same opportunities to share in the American dream as white people. For a long time, slavery and then blatant bigotry were the obvious culprits. Now, the principal culprit might just be systemic government policies that perpetuate hopelessness. One thing is certain, if you are born in the inner city, it's going to be very difficult for you to b…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 04:43 PM
1

They didn't "accidentally" remove white people, they used the most blatant examples of street harassment they could find.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 03:42 PM
7

Good point. I certainly don't want to suggest that there's an epidemic of street harassment the way there's an epidemic of sexual assault on campus--oh, wait--that's not an epidemic either, is it? Good point.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 03:32 PM
3

You are correct -- I was using the "toxic masculinity" in the sense that our feminist friends frequently use it.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 02:58 PM
50

The fact is that if this woman had walked up certain major streets in any major city in America -- streets where law and accounting firms and corporations are in abundance -- she likely would not have experienced any harassment whatsoever. It's not a "race" issue, it's a poverty issue. The culture of impoverishment perpetuates certain attitudes and behaviors, as much as our gender warrior friends won't admit it. But the problem isn't toxic masculinity, it's that there's not enough of the right k…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 02:35 PM
1

A massively important ruling.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 01:23 PM
1

The survey is useless on any level. The test to determine whether sexual misconduct occurred is not whether it is subjectively "unwelcome." The test is whether a party in the position of the initiator reasonably believed consent has been given. The undisclosed, subjective whims of self-identified victims tell only part of the story, not enough to draw ANY conclusions. The only way to assess the prevalence of sexual assault is to do an objective evaluation of a sufficient population of sexual ass…
/r/MensRights30/10/14 02:51 PM
2

Yes, he did.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 06:32 PM
2

The article is not reaching for "common ground" -- that assertion of yours is dishonest and suggests an agenda contrary to the goals of this sub-reddit.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 05:05 PM
5

Thanks for the heads-up.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 12:20 PM
1

On the one-in-five stat: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/wp/2014/05/01/one-in-five-women-in-college-sexually-assaulted-the-source-of-this-statistic/ (The Washington Post, which is scarcely an anti-feminist publication, says there is not enough information to accept the claim that one-in-five college women are sexually assaulted.) http://www.cotwa.info/2014/09/finally-mainstream-news-media-gets-it.html http://www.city-journal.org/2008/18_1_campus_rape.html -- a landmark article t…
/r/MensRights22/10/14 12:06 PM
3

Not sure who "you guys" refers to. The diversity of opinion on this sub-Reddit is great. Anyway, here's a blog that deals with important issues that predominantly impact "dudes": http://www.cotwa.info/
/r/MensRights22/10/14 12:04 PM
2

You are a hero. Great cause.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 09:27 PM
3

I love it! This makes anything David Futrelle's ever mocked look sane and rational.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 09:09 PM
5

That's a put-on, right? I mean, it's a men's rights advocate mocking feminism by taking it to its most extreme level? If it's not a joke, then I will say that, as author of http://www.cotwa.info, I've seen some bizarre things, but this is easily the single most bizarre, and without question the stupidest.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 06:59 PM
126

Um, this is an old story. Here's the most extensive article on it you will find -- an Innocence Project attorney from the office that got him released told me that: http://www.cotwa.info/2012/06/bygones-be-bygones-unspeakable.html
/r/MensRights17/10/14 12:50 PM
2

I think this is the single most significant statement to date about American colleges' hostility to due process when it comes to men accused of sexual misconduct.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 12:43 PM
1

The gist of it is, "you are misinterpreting what I meant by 'ambiguous.'" Wow.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 06:03 PM
1

http://www.cotwa.info/2014/10/the-anti-due-process-activists-at.html
/r/MensRights16/10/14 01:09 PM
0

Good point. Every thing they ask for, they get, and it's never enough. Rape is still an "epidemic" on campus, so they say. The real question: where will it all end?
/r/MensRights16/10/14 12:29 PM
3

More on the story here: http://www.npr.org/2014/10/15/356424999/harvard-law-professors-say-new-sexual-assault-policy-is-one-sided?utm_medium=RSS&utm_campaign=news For NPR to write a story that wasn't totally slanted in favor of "victims" (really, accusers) is due solely to the identity and magnitude of the protest. This was a massively important letter for the wrongly accused.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 11:04 PM
3

You should be thankful we didn't have a bet. More here on Mazzola's "concerns": http://www.npr.org/2014/10/15/356424999/harvard-law-professors-say-new-sexual-assault-policy-is-one-sided?utm_medium=RSS&utm_campaign=news
/r/MensRights15/10/14 11:03 PM
1

Why are you packing?
/r/MensRights15/10/14 07:55 PM
1

I am guessing that a lot of the professors who didn't sign aren't familiar with the issues or don't feel personally invested in it.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 07:15 PM
7

I don't want to dampen your optimism, but these advocates have heard every single argument made here -- FIRE has been beating this drum for years as have many others (including me at COTWA). There have been innumerable op-eds about it, and many attorneys have taken issue with these campus policies. That's why I am certain this group's deep "concern" is not over the arguments posited but the identity of the persons who made them. They're response will start and end with the "one-in-five" statisti…
/r/MensRights15/10/14 06:45 PM
2

Let us know what they say.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 05:53 PM
10

Imagine him resorting to vile stereotypes about any other group. "Jews need to feel a cold spike of fear when they start haggling over price."
/r/MensRights15/10/14 05:51 PM
2

They would probably applaud it, given that it's just college men.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 05:28 PM
8

"It could very much be that they recognize the merits of the argument and are saying they are taking the time to consider the validity of it." I would like to hold out hope for sanity also, but I would bet every penny I have that these ideologues aren't going to see a light go on over their heads and say, "Now I get it!" They are "deeply concerned" because there are few groups in America with more credibility, and they know this is going to create public relations problems for their political ag…
/r/MensRights15/10/14 04:40 PM
8

Typical secular far left ideologue. I wonder how Klein would feel if some nutcase said they want Jews to live in fear.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 04:17 PM
2

Tribe has never been a transformational law professor the way a Corbin, Williston, Karl Llewellyn or Prosser were. (In fairness, it might not be possible in this day and age for law professors to have a significant impact on the law, given that judges and the practicing bar generally don't read or rely on law review articles any more, and that law professors largely aren't writing things to assist the typical lawyer -- they are happy to write for each other about things that most lawyers never d…
/r/MensRights15/10/14 04:14 PM
2

I need an editor. Thanks.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 04:06 PM
3

Yes!
/r/MensRights15/10/14 04:06 PM
8

Well, in California (and soon New York), they are laws that govern colleges.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 04:05 PM
9

Yep. Don't be surprised if we see some strange piece with his signature on it about the "one-in-five" silliness.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 02:55 PM
4

Right.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 02:11 PM
9

Yeah, I mean, why would you bother to solicit the opinion of Harvard law professors when you're writing what are, in effect, laws that will govern student conduct on campus? What a silly idea.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 02:03 PM
100

Exactly. These policies are nothing more than articulations of the old feminist mantra from the '70s "women don't lie about rape." Get it? You don't need due process if women don't lie.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 01:54 PM
31

I am waiting for the loons at Jezebel or Salon to challenge it with their self-righteous, profane feminist snark. In ordinary times, they come off like imbeciles, here I anticipate that we can add "pathetic" to that description. My guess is they'll trot out a couple of feminist Harvard profs who didn't sign the letter (a couple come to mind) to write an op-ed about "one-in-five" (even if true -- and it's not -- it's not an excuse for depriving students of even basic due process) and tout that.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 01:49 PM
14

Yes. I hope the entire community understands how significant this is.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 01:30 PM
56

http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2014/10/15/law-profs-criticize-new-policy/ -- see the comments. The anti-due process forces behind these college policies are the extremists, not us. Add your voice. We are the mainstream on this issue: http://www.cotwa.info/2014/05/cotwa-was-right.html
/r/MensRights15/10/14 12:32 PM
2

You are entirely correct. When it comes to handling college sex claims, progressives find themselves strangely allied with law-and-order conservatives who have fought the expansion of due process at every turn.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 11:58 AM
2

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2jb40r/the_war_on_college_men_goes_too_far_28_harvard/
/r/MensRights15/10/14 11:53 AM
3

http://www.cotwa.info/2014/10/the-columbia-university-marching-bands.html
/r/MensRights13/10/14 05:01 PM
144

What a self-righteous pig. If this is the face of feminism, then feminists are not just angry and irrational, they are bad people.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 11:46 AM
1

Yeah, that's a good excuse to kick justice to the curb: it's good for business.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 11:36 AM
1

Very, very well written. Josh can take over my blog COTWA if he wants.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 10:51 PM
1

If you read my blog, you know I agree with you. http://www.cotwa.info/
/r/MensRights08/10/14 05:12 PM
1

With other violent crime, there is typically proof beyond "he said, she said." You are woefully unschooled on the issues. Spend a few months reading my blog and then you can speak intelligently about it. http://www.cotwa.info/
/r/MensRights08/10/14 12:14 PM
3

Do they do anything for MEN who served?
/r/MensRights07/10/14 07:47 PM
1

Too many.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 12:01 PM
3

No sane person would support the rape chant.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 03:48 AM
1

Stunning.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 05:08 PM
1

No. Were you? I'm going to go out on a limb but . . . Has every woman you know been raped by a fraternity member? Come on, tell me . . . . The answer's "yes," isn't it?
/r/MensRights28/09/14 09:32 PM
2

Not a cross post.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 02:53 PM
1

And that awful Jezebel doesn't condemn this practice.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 06:27 PM
2

OF course you can defend yourself, in whatever way is necessary, but only using the force necessary to defend yourself. By the way, you should never hit anybody, male or female, but you can always -- always -- defend yourself. Tired of these silly discussions.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 10:29 PM
6

Even when the kangaroo campus rape justice system exonerates one of the presumed guilty young men accused of rape, the press picks up the accuser's story and makes sure she's a victim in the court of last resort, the court of public opinion. She's a victim simply because she says she is. In most other settings in this country, that's not enough. We are a nation of laws, not mattresses.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 05:17 PM
1

Your comment is interesting -- these are the same folks who talk about a "culture" of rape, and now they want to enlist the "help" of the guys they've accused. Nice.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 05:00 PM
1

I think the movement is more complex than you give it credit.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 06:43 PM
1

As someone who follows the issue probably a lot more closely than you do, and who has been accused of "victim blaming" and worse many times for doing nothing more than insisting that due process rights not be diminished in the interest of heeding public outcries about rape, you will excuse me if I dismiss out of hand your notion that "we have . . . become fixated on that part of the debate." I write the leading blog dedicated to giving voice to the wrongly accused and I am "fixated" on due proce…
/r/MensRights20/09/14 06:22 PM
2

It is an unhelpful stereotype and most people do not engage in "victim blaming" as the feminists use that term. (And if you want to see victim blaming, check this out: http://www.cotwa.info/p/lambs-to-slaughter-hofstra-false-rape.html) Accusations of "victim blaming" are often lobbed at people who dare to openly wonder whether, in fact, the encounter was consensual, not whether the woman "deserved" to be raped. And therein lies the heart of it: the feminists think anyone who dares to question wh…
/r/MensRights20/09/14 05:18 PM
2

So we resort to conclusory language in order to end the discussion -- "you're victim blaming, end of the discussion. I am enlightened, you are unenlightened; I respect people, you hate women -- I win, you lose." That, of course, is as unhelpful as it is asinine. And it is one of the principal ways that the feminists have shut down any rational dialogue about critical issues. If the sum total of efforts to stop rapists was to "tell women to watch themselves," then by any measure, this would be a …
/r/MensRights20/09/14 04:49 PM
3

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2gw6bo/the_president_calls_on_men_protect_women_from/
/r/MensRights19/09/14 10:05 PM
14

It's a game is what it is. For years, they've tried all manner of things to make rape easier to report and supposedly nothing has worked to reduce the rape "crisis." From rape shield laws, to anonymity for accusers, to the elimination of the corroboration requirement (which has resulted in a de facto reversal of the rule -- now women don't need corroboration to claim rape, but the men accused need something -- a video, etc. -- to be cleared), to VAWA, to immunity from underage drinking charges f…
/r/MensRights19/09/14 10:03 PM
8

On-line. Hey, Time did one a few months ago that favorably cited my blog.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 10:01 PM
7

Right. And in the hook-up culture, it's often the men who are victims.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 09:53 PM
9

Yes, very interesting. I have long thought that at some point, university administrators are going to start balking at the stat lies. So far, they seem to be taking comfort in the admonitions of radical feminists that no school is doing a good job -- all are equally bad at handling sexual assault. College presidents are hiding behind such tripe -- they aren't being singled out since its a nationwide crisis, so they don't care.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 09:47 PM
1

"Mr. Dude" to you.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 08:36 PM
4

Yes, I am thankful that some feminist thinks that men, as a class, can be saved. That was sarcasm.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 07:39 PM
2

Oh, my, oh, my. An LBJ defender. If only that motorcade had detoured away from Elm Street . . . .
/r/MensRights16/09/14 07:31 PM
1

The "f" word is so tarnished by nutcases, it would be best to jettison it altogether.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 04:00 PM
2

The comment I posted: I am astounded that these sorts of things are even issues in this day and age. When we single one group out for "special" treatment, what sort of message are we sending our children? That the group singled out either deserves, or needs, special treatment. These courtesies may seem insignificant to those offended by articles like this, but when we make it a point to conduct our affairs along antiquated gender lines, and try to gussy up our attitudes by claiming it's just "go…
/r/MensRights09/09/14 02:43 PM
3

Thanks for your comment.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 11:46 PM
3

Thanks. I'll tell you what, I wrote this little piece because I was really disappointed when I saw what Princeton is about to do. Very demoralizing, because I don't think it helps anyone.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 11:09 PM
46

I suggest we do a petition about the injustice of singling out males for prosecution where it isn't appropriate without "making our point" with another injustice.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 11:02 PM
4

I explained above what I did, thanks for the defense. I assume s/he is commenting in good faith.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 10:58 PM
2

It's my article. I cited to two sources in the article -- the second is the news story that explains how Princeton is about to switch to the preponderance standard. No big story there, all the schools are doing it. What makes this a story is that Princeton had been following an innovative approach that nicely balanced the interests of accusers and accuseds. The first link in my post is a lengthy analysis I did two years ago explaining this, and providing citations at the end to support it. This …
/r/MensRights07/09/14 10:57 PM
3

Correct.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 09:55 PM
17

Feminists are creating an empire of their own on campus. It's that simple.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 09:18 PM
6

Unschooled regarding one of the great headlines in the history of journalism, aren't we?
/r/MensRights07/09/14 09:16 PM
4

This is a story about her, not you. You can't control the strange things some people think, and her reaction is not worthy of getting you upset.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 01:17 PM
3

So sick of this guilt by reason of an accusation. Not sure why the letter was issued -- someone either thought it was warranted, or it was done to appease the gender crazies.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 08:06 PM
1

I'm tired of doing that.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 01:10 PM
1

I don't know if you can tell: I don't care for the Harvard Crimson.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 10:31 PM
15

Thanks for saying that. This is a serious issue and comments like that are hateful distractions.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 07:08 PM
2

http://www.cotwa.info/2011/02/a-girl-who-was-statutorily-raped-gets.html
/r/MensRights04/09/14 02:40 PM
9

It is my uninformed sense that, indeed, gay men face a stigma that is different, and in some critical ways, worse, than the stigma that afflicts lesbians. Society largely treats gay men as freaks, objects of ridicule and derision. I remember in junior high school, girls would routinely ridicule a particular boy with taunts that he was "gay." This was intended to hurt him, because being gay meant he could not be a real man, they felt. Remember Mel Gibson's much acclaimed film "Braveheart"? The se…
/r/MensRights03/09/14 08:03 PM
3

I couldn't agree more!
/r/MensRights03/09/14 07:31 PM
2

Excellent.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 07:29 PM
6

Go away mad. I'm the bad guy. You were trying to make a point that has no validity, I shot it down, and you have a hissy fit and insist I don't understand you. See? I can't win. No matter what you say, and no matter what I say, I'm wrong and you're right.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 05:57 PM
11

The posters are dangerous because they fail to tell the whole story. We now know that a lot of men are being unfairly charged with rape in situations where the parties are mutually inebriated. That's not MY opinion -- it's from Brett Sokolow, head of NCHERM who has done more to champion to rights of rape victims on campus than anyone in America. Sokolow says that men are being charged for engaging in mutually tipsy sex and that this is discrimination against the guy. Mr. Sokolow also recently de…
/r/MensRights03/09/14 05:53 PM
3

Your point makes no sense. I've explained why the analogy is apt. You seem more interested in spewing talking points that are neither pertinent here nor correct anywhere.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 05:37 PM
3

They don't need fuel. They actually had some twit put my blog on their SPLC hate list for no reason, so I couldn't care less about giving them "fuel."
/r/MensRights03/09/14 05:00 PM
3

I, too, think we should call the police when we see a crime committed. Good comment. Pierce Harlan http://www.cotwa.info/
/r/MensRights03/09/14 04:50 PM
2

Given the context of her statement, it was offensive. They are not "boys," they are men. Pierce Harlan http://www.cotwa.info/
/r/MensRights03/09/14 04:49 PM
2

"The analogy doesn't hold up if you trusted the burglar and gave him a key." The analogy holds up just fine. I've blogged about this for a long time at COTWA -- http://www.cotwa.info/ -- and the sine qua non of garden variety campus rape isn't fraud in the inducement committed by a trusted male friend, it is inebriated sex with someone the woman barely knows. It is ludicrous to suggest that women should be encouraged to be as careless as the person who refuses to lock her front door when she goe…
/r/MensRights03/09/14 04:48 PM
2

Minor correction. She said 85% of these "boys" . . . .
/r/MensRights03/09/14 04:38 PM
3

It is also a good thing in articles written from the alleged victim's perspective, but it's hardly ever done there.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 02:14 PM
7

I would not encourage anyone to trap someone into rape. The law is not supposed to be a game of "gotcha"!, unfortunately, this new law lends itself to that. Very bad idea for a law.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 06:14 PM
6

There are in excess of 40 lawsuits by male students filed in the past 18 months or so (including a victory in one last Friday I'll be writing about). A misapplication of this new law in the manner I've suggested will subject the offending school to legal challenge. We don't need class actions, we need a legal precedent from one of these cases. We need a Circuit Court of Appeals holding that a student was deprived of due process for reasons that are widely applicable. With that said, the problem …
/r/MensRights29/08/14 05:36 PM
2

"You folks" are you folks. You know damn well who you are, and so do I. And I follow the issue a lot more closely than you do, I would guess. Spend a few weeks educating yourself by reading my blog, then you can talk about it. http://www.cotwa.info/
/r/MensRights27/08/14 04:21 PM
2

I follow the issue a lot more closely than you do, I would guess. Spend a few weeks educating yourself by reading my blog, then you can talk about it. http://www.cotwa.info/
/r/MensRights27/08/14 04:20 PM
4

The "culture"? Seriously? Read Dr. Lisak sometime. A small percentage of men are sociopaths who rape. The vast majority of men would gladly break their heads open. Let's stop feeding trolls by pretending there's a "rape culture" that even RAINN distanced itself from.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 03:22 AM
7

"Many people think rape is okay . . . ." Sociopaths do, but "many"? Have you ever read Dr. Lisak's research that you folks tout so frequently? He said that mild educational endeavors (e.g., telling men and boys not to rape) doesn't stop the small group of sociopaths who commit almost all the rapes.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 03:20 AM
2

. . . and possibly ruined his life or drove him to suicide.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 03:17 AM
2

This is an important story -- good find.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 03:15 AM
2

You bet. John Ford's great elegy to the Old West.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 04:25 PM
12

Yes! When the legend becomes fact, old cowboys and feminists alike insist on printing the legend. The date rape drug myth persists even though it was long ago debunked. http://www.cotwa.info/2011/06/the-date-rape-drug-hoax-that-just-won.html
/r/MensRights26/08/14 10:55 AM
2

The head of RAINN explained why most women don't report: http://www.cotwa.info/2010/11/sexual-grievance-industry-bigwig-under.html
/r/MensRights21/08/14 05:36 PM
2

I would agree with Futrelle that the shirt is a "joke" -- if it weren't for the overwhelming evidence of Jessica Valenti's hostility to due process when it comes to men and to traditional notions of masculinity. She's also a rape alarmist and a fear-monger.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 02:35 PM
2

Brett Sokolow has done more to advance the cause of female rape victims than anyone in America, and he recently said that in many cases, schools are singling out males as rapists in drunken sex when, in fact, they are every bit as much the victim as their female partners. The stigma against males coming forward is so firmly entrenched that I don't see it changing drastically in my lifetime. Your efforts are appreciated.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 10:26 PM
1

No. The woman should be afforded all assistance due persons who've experienced a violent attack, but unlike civil actions where the would-be plaintiff has discretion whether to seek redress, rape is not a "private crime" -- there is no such thing -- and it isn't up to her to decide whether an investigation should occur that might nab a criminal who likely will prey on others. We don't empower women by treating them as weak or insisting they have a choice in a matter so serious.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 05:41 PM
7

Sorry, if someone tells anyone connected with a college they've been the victim of a brutal crime, the crime needs to be reported. If someone was punched in the face to the point of being knocked out and then reported that to an employee of the school, there would be no hesitation about reporting it, even if the victim was scared or hesitant to report it. Why? Because it's a serious crime. It is time to stop treating rape as something other than it is, and time to stop allowing PC warriors to di…
/r/MensRights20/08/14 03:09 PM
1

"Frustrating"? That's a typical blogosphere feminist nitwit. Feminist -- nitwit, no difference. They can't argue, they can't reason, they can't write. The only thing they can do is stomp their feet and insist your point of view isn't worth considering.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 12:52 PM
1

Um, whatever.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 10:59 PM
1

Schools don't fire students, they expel them. Business owners have to have discretion to run their business in the manner they see fit to make a profit. Schools have no such interest in their treatment of students. Since schools receive federal monies and are subject to Title IX, they should also be subject to due process, which is mandated by the Constitution.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 08:08 PM
1

If Title IX applies to private institutions, why shouldn't due process? Or is Title more important than due process?
/r/MensRights01/08/14 07:10 PM
1

Private institutions generally are guided by their contractual commitments to students, often memorialized in their student handbooks.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 06:06 PM
2

Here's where it says that: http://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/courts/2014/05/05/uc-student-fights-disciplinary-hearing/8721431/
/r/MensRights30/07/14 03:05 PM
1

You are wrong, of course. They are appalling.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 11:34 AM
1

He's a big time law professor just letting people know his opinion.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 02:24 PM
1

http://www.consad.com/content/reports/Gender%20Wage%20Gap%20Final%20Report.pdf
/r/MensRights29/07/14 12:52 PM
2

Here. This is from my blog. Explain these: http://www.cotwa.info/2014/06/add-these-to-misandry-hall-of-fame.html
/r/MensRights29/07/14 12:51 PM
4

"Verdict"? That's the whole point. These kangaroo courts fail to provide due process. There was no "verdict."
/r/MensRights29/07/14 12:49 PM
1

Yes, because human behavior is never a clue as what women think or believe. Women always act in ways opposite to what reason and common sense suggest. Right.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 12:46 PM
1

Intoxication is not incapacitation. Sometimes women are raped and don't know it is rape. When women do what this woman did, generally, it is impossible to conclude they were raped -- because such women are often lying.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 12:45 PM
2

The regular courtrooms do not give the feminists the result they seek so they have invented a justice of their own, where feminist sensibilities can run amok.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 12:40 PM
2

Right, but the Dept. of Education seems to think that its interpretation of a statute (Title IX) trumps due process, which emanates from the Constitution and has its origins in Magna Carta or earlier.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 12:39 PM
6

What the hell do you want him to do? Start a blog called "Man Boobz" or something? Now THAT would get people to listen (cough, cough).
/r/MensRights29/07/14 12:35 AM
31

And note this isn't COTWA or Paul Elam who wrote this. The due process problem for men on campus is now getting some pretty high profile attention.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 09:02 PM
12

Yes. To require a kid to waive his right of self-incrimination in order to protect his right to an education is sick beyond measure. The feminists are the ones pushing for these institutionalized injustices, which is not just troubling but, yes, evidences why they are held in such disrepute. This truly is man-hating, in the best tradition of radical feminism.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 09:00 PM
6

Sexual nagging is now an offense at many, many colleges: http://www.cotwa.info/2012/03/legal-infirmities-to-punishing-sexual.html
/r/MensRights25/07/14 05:11 PM
61

That is a gate attendant who abused her authority and probably should be fired for it.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 05:35 PM
5

They purportedly would say she was too inebriated to validly consent.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 02:24 PM
2

You are exactly right.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 07:44 PM
2

The leading authority in America on campus sexual assault, NCHERM's president Brett Sokolow, said recently that he's seeing a lot of schools erroneously charging the male in mutually drunken sexual encounters when the female is every bit as guilty of sexual assault in such encounters as he is. http://atixa.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/ATIXA-Tip-of-the-Week-04_24_141.pdf Is this a serious problem? It certainly is, primarily because of the antiquated mindset that sex is something men d…
/r/MensRights21/07/14 07:41 PM
2

This is an advocacy piece that contains a number of significant errors. For people who don't know the territory, it probably will get their blood boiling about rape. It skips the whole "due process" thing. Oh, and RAINN says to ditch the "rape culture" meme.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 07:33 PM
1

You wrote: "So basically, you want a criminal proceeding, even though colleges are arms of the government?" I responded that I will take fewer protections and used the civil breach of contract standard by analogy. That, by the way, is entirely apt. For private colleges, typically student handbooks have contractual significance, so a failure to abide by the sexual assault procedures in the handbook is a breach of contract.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 02:43 PM
7

The comments under the original story are somewhat disturbing, from assuming every accusation is a rape to suggesting college men need to live in fear of women. Our current climate is breeding not just divisions but a chasm when it comes to dealing with rape claims. It seems the entire public discourse has been taken over by hysterics and gender crazies.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 02:29 PM
1

Beethoven is MRA music, don't you know? And this tells you how twisted our detractors are. You mentioned the feminist musicologist Susan McClary. She famously advanced the theory that the first movement of the [Beethoven's] Ninth Symphony was a musical expression of misogynistic violence. You write that a similar theory was espoused by the poet Adrienne Rich. McClary’s original idea which became one of the things that some of the public seems to have remembered was her notion that she sees the f…
/r/MensRights19/07/14 04:46 PM
1

Yes, you are right. But I suggest that we not even explain ourselves. There is too much explaining ourselves here. This is so self-evidently stupid to anyone not indoctrinated in their sorry cult, it deserves to be dismissed with a derisive laugh.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 04:39 PM
3

Exactly. Not worthy of serious examination, it's stupid on its face.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 11:54 PM
19

Unbelievable. Max writes: "We spent a few nights in each others’ rooms, but we never had sex and neither of us pressured the other into doing anything we weren’t comfortable with." Kelly Kend writes: "And when he says he didn’t, I don’t so much hear that he is innocent as he is ignorant to how rape works and is afraid to admit that he might be a rapist." And: "It is telling in Max’s response that he points out that they never even had sex as a reason why this couldn’t have happened." Kelly, that…
/r/MensRights18/07/14 09:23 PM
3

I completely agree.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 07:31 PM
9

The real debate is over Middle East politics. Maher didn't trivialize domestic violence or suggest that slapping women in the absence of self-defense was appropriate. This is not a gender issue.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 04:47 PM
2

I appreciate the kind words, but we really need folks like Banzhaf who the expertise and the credibility to raise these issues. I can't tell you how ecstatic I am to see folks like this involved.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 04:43 PM
6

Don't blame Prof. Banzhaf.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 04:23 PM
6

His is a lot better. I dashed mine off pretty quickly because the thought just occurred to me one day.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 01:50 PM
21

http://www.cotwa.info/2014/07/if-your-son-is-accused-of-sexual.html
/r/MensRights18/07/14 01:45 PM
4

At COTWA, we've broken down Dr. Lisak's numbers many time. Your numbers in the "unknown" category are higher than his, but the majority can't be classified, that's beyond any dispute. Check COTWA -- search for Lisak and you'll find we've written about it many, many times.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 12:20 PM
8

AMEN!
/r/MensRights17/07/14 09:01 PM
28

It may be the law, but it is not justice. It may give skittish parents solace, but it is not fair. We may not know Josh, but he is our brother, and next time, it could be us.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 08:58 PM
3

He does write some things that are ridiculous. I won't go so far as you since he's the man who shot down "rape culture" and got the feminist blogosphere so terribly upset. (I think I see too many grays, don't I?)
/r/MensRights17/07/14 04:33 PM
7

I'm with you on that. I wish more men would do that.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 04:31 PM
20

What they don't get is this: Conor Oberst is not a stand-in for all "men," he's not a representative of the "patriarchy," and he can't help that he was born with a penis or that he was victimized in this particular manner. He suffered an injustice, and he deserves redress. Period.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 04:10 PM
4

I noticed this thread and the discussion about what's worse, rape or a false rape claim. I've had to deal with that question for as long as I've been blogging, and I'm sick of it: http://www.cotwa.info/2013/11/can-we-please-ditch-simple-minded.html
/r/MensRights17/07/14 01:05 PM
3

Wait, wait, wait. Let's make sure we understand what's being said. Mr. Berkowitz of RAINN said that not being believed has gone down the list. Now it's more they don't want their loved ones to know what happened. What that primarily means is that college women don't want their parents to know they were in erotic situations even if the guy went too far. That's an understanable reason. It would be tough for a lot of young college women to reveal something like this to their parents: "All I agreed …
/r/MensRights17/07/14 12:58 PM
6

". . . the number one reason is that police won't take them seriously . . .. " I would just point out that Mr. Berkowitz founded and runs the largest anti-rape organization in America. While I don't agree with everything they say, he's one of the true experts on the subject.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 12:23 PM
1

http://www.cotwa.info/2014/07/suing-your-false-rape-accuser.html
/r/MensRights17/07/14 11:44 AM
9

Your endorsement of my Web site is heartwarming. Hope that someday you aren't one of the young men featured on COTWA.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 03:10 AM
1

Amazing, the downvotes for the Innocence Project!
/r/MensRights16/07/14 10:25 PM
3

"I was even offered to go give my side of the story on some tv show, should I do it?" Um, yeah, that sounds real. Uh huh. Interesting that you use the shorthand "FRA" that few people use (I think a commentator on my Web site actually invented it), but you don't even know if there's a Web site for "men" that are falsely accused. Yep. This sounds real.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 08:32 PM
8

Yes! "Oh, by the way, remember that thing we told you was all resolved from when you were a freshman? Well, heh heh, we've UN-resolved it, and you can't graduate because of it. Sorry!"
/r/MensRights16/07/14 08:16 PM
6

Good points. Another one of the recent due process cases involving a heterosexual kid is captioned under "John Doe." The school fought it but I think it's still "John Doe." I think that's appropriate for all these cases -- the decision to call him "John Doe" was the kid's/his lawyer's. I don't think the news media would be so gentle. I do think that it's especially appropriate here if this kid isn't ready to tell the world he's gay. I feel badly for this kid--to have this stuff thrown in his fac…
/r/MensRights16/07/14 05:52 PM
1

How about this: I will take the same procedural protections used for a breach of contract dispute over whether the box of widgets sold had the agreed number of widgets! By the way, even claims for promissory estoppel in some states are adjudicated using the clear and convincing standard. What would YOU have colleges do? No procedures at all?
/r/MensRights15/07/14 05:59 PM
0

From what I've been able to determine, the post was misleading. Please see my correction of this post here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2arj2e/we_need_to_correct_a_popular_post_on_this_site/
/r/MensRights15/07/14 02:32 PM
2

No, they're not lying. This is advocacy, and they're latching onto what they have to make their point that rape is too common. I agree, rape is too common, and folks like me who speak for the wrongly accused need to say that a lot more. But even though rape is too common, that's not a valid reason to diminish due process rights. The one-in-five is used to foment outrage, and outrage breeds injustice. Mark A Godsey of the Innocence Project has said that "the risk of wrongful conviction is the hig…
/r/MensRights14/07/14 09:16 PM
1

I know of some very good Republican parents who seemed quite fair-minded to me, thank you very much. His name was Abe and hers was Mary Todd. Great people.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 09:11 PM
1

Yeah, imagine anyone getting upset about a silly thing like rape.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 09:07 PM
1

No. A clear and convincing standard. The right to an attorney. The right to confront and cross examine the accuser. Some minimal right to discovery of all pertinent information. An adjudicator that is not steeped in the language of gender get-evenism. You would do well to read COTWA to understand how important these issues are.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 07:30 PM
2

Have you read the transcript of this proceeding, or are you content to rely on the accuser's description?
/r/MensRights13/07/14 02:11 PM
1

It is an accusation, no more reliable that a rape claim.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 02:03 PM
1

Problem is not nearly so black and white, in my opinion. The longer I write COTWA, the less I am able to stereotype these things.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 01:56 AM
1

No, it's more about being taught that if a woman hesitates but the male presses her for sex, it's rape even though she actually consented.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 04:41 PM
11

"It is hard to imagine a more irresponsible message" -- except that the message referenced is scientific fact. This is where we've come in matters involving gender. Facts are "irresponsible."
/r/MensRights11/07/14 02:32 PM
4

The hostility of the Dept. of Education, and the American colleges it funds, to due process for young men accused of sexual violence.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 02:19 PM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2ae8p2/here_is_the_video_of_paul_elams_debate_with_matt/ciugvg0
/r/MensRights11/07/14 02:02 PM
1

A kangaroo court. And by the way, college disciplinary proceedings bear no relation to a civil suit for damages, where stringent rules of evidence and the right of confrontation and cross-examination more closely resemble criminal trials than disciplinary proceedings in the academy.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 01:57 PM
1

http://www.cotwa.info/2014/07/sen-mccaskills-report-on-campus-sexual.html
/r/MensRights10/07/14 01:09 PM
2

Sure.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 07:57 PM
6

I am going through it and found parts of it astounding. I hope to have a post about it by tomorrow.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 05:17 PM
3

Wait, wait -- they are being hired to handle the sexual assault problem. It is a major issue in colleges across the country, and the impetus to hire these folks is the perceived rape epidemic. As for crazy comments, I don't approve of them, but perhaps my tone was off on this piece? I think I'll remove it from the Reddit board. P.S. You are correct -- Title IX is good, and it's important. My bigger beef is that colleges don't care about young men when they cut wrestling etc. just to save scholar…
/r/MensRights09/07/14 03:03 PM
2

My guess is that these hires are talented and qualified people. What I find worrisome is the cottage industry we've created to nail young men on rape. I call it the "sexual grievance industry." (I didn't invent that name -- I actually formerly attributed it to the guy who invented it, but he sent me a note pleading with me not to use his name -- he didn't want to be associated with it. So I now act like I invented it.)
/r/MensRights09/07/14 02:47 PM
3

I always thought the goal was to eradicate rape, not to see which school can report the most rapes. Shows you what I know.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 11:46 PM
7

Yes, they, um, over-reported. The opposite of under-reported. Read my blog sometime and you'll get it. "Sorry."
/r/MensRights08/07/14 11:36 PM
14

Your comment is appreciated. I am certain there is underreporting. Likewise, I know that, for example, Berkeley had a famous spell of over-reporting that lasted for many years. We need to insist that the entire process be depoliticized, and that every claim be properly handled by folks without an agenda or a gender chip on her shoulder. Rape is primarily the product of a relatively small number of serial rapists who target naive, drunk college women. Ditch the "Tell men not to rape" posters and …
/r/MensRights08/07/14 10:24 PM
5

You mean fewer reported rapes, I hope.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 05:15 PM
17

"The respondents have little incentive to lie." First, who is talking about lying? Lying is not the problem; the problem is one of perception -- of evidence and proof. These damn murky encounters often yield two different perceptions and testimonial evidence that is anything but clear. Even the National Institute of Justice said that when it comes to these hook-ups, "Men and women may have different perceptions of the same incident." That has nothing to do with lying. Brett Sokolow recently deta…
/r/MensRights08/07/14 04:59 PM
2

Call it a "ham sandwich" if you like. My comparison is apt. (By the way, no one is talking about a "civil action." A "civil action" is the federal suits that the feminist professors are belittling.)
/r/MensRights08/07/14 02:41 PM
7

I am very sorry to see your post and wish you the best. Please, please, please -- do not post anything else about your case without your attorney's permission. Things you write on-line might be subject to discovery and you would be required to turn it over to the opposition. I would not do anything else without speaking with counsel. Tell him or her about this one, just so they are aware. Good luck, my friend.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 10:18 PM
5

You tell it, sister! This country was built on the backs of great artists like you, spewing incomprehensible musings, sprinkled with foul language and suspect grammar! Mark Twain, Hemingway, Mailer, Jacques Futrelle -- they all did it. And what was the result? Do I even have to say it? "Huckleberry Finn"! The incandescent light bulb! You are making a splendid contribution to society and are spending your time wisely. You go, girlfriend!
/r/MensRights07/07/14 07:39 PM
13

Subjecting callow 19-year-old men to this process, and forcing them to fend for themselves against ideologically-driven college administrators, seems a sort of feminist blood sport, almost unimaginably cruel when the accused happens to be innocent.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 06:41 PM
12

What a steaming pile of PC bullshit. As a blogger who actually deals with real issues, I am offended that someone would waste their time on this garbage, and even more offended that anyone would read it. Everyone outside of the progressive news media, academia, and the feminist community laughs at crap like this. Do not read it.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 09:03 PM
2

Thanks!
/r/MensRights05/07/14 07:09 PM
2

Hopefully turn it over to AVfM soon so I can step back and let others carry the ball. I have pretty much said all I can say on the subject.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 12:23 PM
8

Just stop! This is just insane. He's attracted to attractive women. That's not "sexism" in the sense almost everyone uses the word. It's normal. I swear we're reaching the saturation point for nuttiness on these gender issues. It would probably be healthier for everyone if we started thinking about other things.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 02:39 AM
5

What a nitwit.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 02:36 AM
1

Overall it's not good.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 01:57 AM
2

That's one sick girl.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 08:36 PM
15

Well, they aren't after the kind of justice you and I know. They want an institution to rubber-stamp their assertion, due process be damned. A circus it is.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 07:51 PM
1

A reasonable time. The law uses that standard in all manner of circumstances, despite its imprecision. In this case, maybe a couple of seconds?
/r/MensRights02/07/14 07:11 PM
1

I do think this is a huge plus.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 07:09 PM
1

Right. I suspect the law would not be equally enforced against female rapists, and that this will breed yet more lawsuits by young men. I say, bring on the lawsuits -- they're the only thing that is going to restore sanity here.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 06:46 PM
1

Once consent is withdrawn, the other party has to stop, despite his or her disappointment. But the party revoking consent cannot undo his or her previous consent or turn what was a consensual act into rape. This is the law in most places, and it mirrors common decency. What decent person wants to continue having intercourse with someone who has manifested a desire to stop? Will the man get laughed out of a police station? My guess is that the cops would strongly discourage him from pushing the i…
/r/MensRights02/07/14 06:39 PM
3

Exactly.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 06:35 PM
3

Of course. These laws are aimed at young men, and they are almost exclusively used against young men, and that's why I worded it like that. But you are 100% correct.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 06:35 PM
11

Let's all agree on a couple of things. Of course there must be consent for the entire encounter. Of course once consent is conferred it can be retracted at any time. And of course a young man can't mount an incapacitated young woman, or stick his penis in woman who has given no indication that she is okay with that. Once consent is manifested, by words or deeds, and once penetration has occurred, is it necessary for either party to ask the other throughout the process, "Are you still okay with t…
/r/MensRights02/07/14 05:29 PM
7

Yes.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 04:04 PM
3

Besides, the very thing Goldwag complains about is David Futrelle's modus operandi -- he cherry picks outliers to attack.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 02:00 AM
1

Michael, I am sending you a private message where snockadilez/David Futrelle can't hear it.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 11:45 PM
2

Ugh! I DO like Paul. You know who I don't like? David Futrelle. You wouldn't happen to know him, would you?
/r/MensRights30/06/14 11:38 PM
4

Thanks for the sentiment, but Paul was well aware that I just wouldn't do it--and that's not because I don't like Paul.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 10:45 PM
3

Sokolow says that schools are misapplying the law out of fear they aren't in compliance with Title IX. As much as I fear the Obama administration's take-no-prisoners stance toward due process, if schools would follow Brett's lead (and by the way, he's a FEMINIST!), there may be no need for COTWA.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 09:14 PM
8

Gstreetshit, I don't even know what "feminism" is at this stage, I only know that the principal proponents of it on the issues I write about are hostile to due process, and Arthur Goldwag has allied himself with it. Whenever someone attacks "feminism," some bright person will assume they are not in favor of gender equality. But, see, gender equality doesn't require this puerile hostility to due process that is so closely associated with feminists who write about the sexual assault problem. That'…
/r/MensRights30/06/14 08:42 PM
3

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/29hhqh/sorry_arthur_goldwag_misandry_isnt_confined_to/
/r/MensRights30/06/14 07:54 PM
3

I was jealous when I read it.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 07:28 PM
1

At this moment, Brett Sokolow and his law firm represent more men wrongly punished by their colleges than most defense counsel will ever represent in their lives. Brett has expressed the principal sentiments of my blog far more persuasively than I ever could. I have publicly expressed my support for their work on behalf of victims. They are for fairness, so I can't imagine they would support the SPLC to the extent it turns a blind eye to these issues Brett and I write about. And just to be fair,…
/r/MensRights30/06/14 07:26 PM
10

That's really good!
/r/MensRights30/06/14 06:08 PM
4

http://www.cotwa.info/2014/06/man-wrongly-imprisoned-for-sexual.html
/r/MensRights30/06/14 01:49 PM
6

http://www.cotwa.info/2012/03/legal-infirmities-to-punishing-sexual.html
/r/MensRights25/06/14 02:53 PM
1

He said it as if he was playfully pandering. I need to be careful criticizing such statements. The last time I took exception to something like that, the SPLC put my on their hate list -- and this is the only specific post they cited to justify that -- tell me if you think it's hate speech: http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2012/01/off-topic-it-takes-woman-to-get-things.html
/r/MensRights24/06/14 01:39 PM
1

I've never seen any bad rape law repealed. Remember Fed.R.Evid. 413 that is so heinous that even Joe Biden was against it? It's still on the books decades later.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 10:20 PM
2

Two prominent Stanford law profs were among the most vocal critics of the Dear Colleague letter. I told the one to keep up the good fight, he glumly told me that they had lost the battle. The noisy PC left has won the battle, hopefully not the war.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 08:57 PM
1

Yeah. If this is "patriarchy," it's not serving our sons well.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 05:37 PM
4

No, but here's an article contrasting what I do with mainstream feminism: http://www.cotwa.info/2014/05/cotwa-was-right.html
/r/MensRights23/06/14 05:32 PM
9

There are a lot of anecdotal police accounts vouching for the prevalence of false rape reporting. These are generally dismissed as unreliable, but the problems with the report relied on to get at the 1-in-5 number for campus rapes are profound, so perhaps these shouldn't be waved off so readily. http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2009/04/must-read-story-police-say-half-or-more.html http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2009/02/this-is-shockingly-candid-must-reading.html http://falserapesociety.…
/r/MensRights23/06/14 05:28 PM
5

Right. Those terms are intended to be discussion-closers. The other thing is this: why on earth are these men their "opponents"? If they've been deprived of due process in any respect, isn't that something that any fair-minded person would want to know? Tidbit: since I started writing about these California professors last week, COTWA has more hits from California than any other states (which, for whatever reason, is not usually the case).
/r/MensRights23/06/14 05:20 PM
2

The reality is that even considering the alleged rapes actually reported, the majority can't be classified as actual rapes or non-rapes (per Dr. David Lisak, and every other serious study ever conducted).
/r/MensRights23/06/14 04:17 PM
6

Wait, wait, wait. AVfM didn't declare itself the "head" of the movement. The free market decided that. Any outlet that is so popular speaking up for the so-called "advantaged" group has a target on its back. It doesn't matter what you say, they are are going to make up things about you. How do I know? Because they've done it to me. I run COTWA, and before that, False Rape Society. The SPLC went so far as to unfairly put us on a hate list, noting that we "featured stories about allegedly false ra…
/r/MensRights23/06/14 12:51 PM
1

I love this quote.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 01:27 PM
35

Here is a comment by a woman who identifies as a feminist under the Ms. Magazine blog entry. It makes an excellent point: Fran says: June 20, 2014 at 9:36 am I always am confronted with a personal hypocrisy (to use my own words) when it comes to issues like these. As a liberal, I sympathize with a biased judicial system where defendants are often on the short end of the stick, stigmatized for life with felon status, and often have their constitutional rights infringed before, during, and after t…
/r/MensRights21/06/14 07:01 PM
8

For the rape claims that are reported, the majority can't be classified as actual rapes or non-rapes. To say that only twelve percent of all rape victims report is to suggest that every claim in self-reporting studies is an actual rape, which is absurd. The reason COTWA doesn't deal with this very question a lot more often is that discussion of it is misconstrued as rape apology. We have no interest in trivializing the rape problem, but we do get tired of false numbers being tossed about to "pro…
/r/MensRights21/06/14 05:38 PM
16

No, my point was that most people -- not just men -- accept the gender roles assigned to them. Sometimes we hear progressive bloggers suggest that it is only the "men" who are holding women back.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 01:28 PM
1

Don't know.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 12:58 PM
2

Your comments about erring on the side of victims shows that you are unschooled in the traditions underpining our jurisprudence. That is unfortunate, and depending on the level of your schooling, possibly appalling. You would do well to educate yourself about Blackstone's formulation: http://www.cotwa.info/2012/05/barbaric-it-is-worth-risk-to-punish.html
/r/MensRights21/06/14 03:09 AM
0

Love it.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 09:30 PM
2

I don't think I ever thought about it that way but you make a good point.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 11:32 PM
2

On the expulsion issue, if you've been reading my blog (COTWA) you know that NCHERM's president, Brett Sokolow, has caused a big stir lately because colleges are wrongly exercising their discretion to expel men, and it's happening a lot. Sokolow is the architect of sexual assault disciplinary policies for colleges across America, and if he is concerned (and he is), then there is a very serious problem. The objections to the sleepwalking man statue were so nutty that even staunch feminist Amanda …
/r/MensRights19/06/14 09:03 PM
11

Won't do any good. Contracts can be freely modified even if they contain a "no oral modification" clause. (There are limitations on post-formation modifications of common law contracts under New York law and for contracts for the sale of goods, but otherwise the law recognizes that parties can freely alter their deals.)
/r/MensRights19/06/14 07:12 PM
3

Me, too, but not for the reasons it scares the callow feminists. If I thought this was a real man, I'd be scared he's going to walk into traffic and kill himself because he looks blasted.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 06:59 PM
9

Honestly, I am dumbfounded. Hate gussied up with PhDs and theses.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 06:30 PM
12

I always thought rape was a crime, and that the only definition that mattered was the one in the criminal statutes. I didn't know that rape was a '70s mood ring.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 06:27 PM
7

Yes. It is probably the only check on colleges giving into the mob mentality of "castrate" signs and all the other indicia of rushing to judgment.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 06:26 PM
10

And the funny thing is that at least three airlines actually had that policy. One airline apparently revised it after a man sued and the airline settled. Imagine publicizing that policy! What sort of message does this send to our children! It is unfathomable how anyone could support this policy.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 06:24 PM
21

The money is being paid out to the victims of false rape claims.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 06:21 PM
55

Yeah, that 33 percent raised a red flag with me, too. While women with mental health issues can be raped, we've seen a lot of troubled women who make false rape claims at my blogs COTWA and False Rape Society.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 06:20 PM
3

Add that to the list, too.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 06:17 PM
6

Ha! Let the airline explain to the other passengers why he's being upgraded!
/r/MensRights19/06/14 06:15 PM
8

Add this to the list.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 06:14 PM
27

Right. In an age where we scold men for not having a proper work-life balance and for not equally sharing responsibilities for child-raising, we simultaneously send out the message that men aren't fit even to sit next to children on an airplane, much less raise them. Do people like the brilliant nut who made this comment think that our sons don't get pick up on this? Daddy is supposed to do everything mommy does, except he's not allowed to sit next to children on an airplane -- because a relativ…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 06:03 PM
2

She makes the rules? And they call this "feminism"? Oh, okay. In other words, feminism is pretty much what the guys David Futrelle mocks says it is. NOW I get it! The daughter is daddy's little princess, and daddy is a white knight doofus.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 05:42 PM
20

And somewhere Joseph Pulitzer weeps. More feminist tyranny. If they don't like you, they try to silence you.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 05:03 PM
25

You mean these aren't some anonymous half-wits with a free blog that David Futrelle digs up to smear an entire movement? You make a good point.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 04:40 PM
11

For my money, that is one of the two or three worst quotes of all time.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 04:38 PM
2

Sure.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 09:51 PM
1

I was rushed for time. I had already done a post and then I saw that story, and I didn't have much time left.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 09:08 PM
3

Yes. And we've seen other instances where boys were twice victimized: first they are statutorily raped, then they are lied about.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 08:49 PM
3

I think you are being too kind to this kid. I recently told Cathy Young the same thing, and she agreed: at COTWA, I end up speaking up for a hell of a lot of guys whose moral compass, in my opinion, is askew. I understand about raging hormones etc. but come on. What the hell is happening in our culture? As for the teacher, she's not a helpless leaf in the wind. Do I think a female OR male teacher should go to jail for this? Nope. But it's a pity that she didn't act like the adult here. Maybe bec…
/r/MensRights18/06/14 08:19 PM
1

I think you are being unfair to me. Could I have worded it better? I am sure I could have, but your point is beyond me. You must be a whole lot smarter than I am. I have admitted I am wrong numerous times on my blog. I don't see it here. My headline in my post is this: "To malign Hillary Clinton, right wing channels radical feminism's nutty hostility to due process." The Wash. Post suggests it is beneath an advocate for women's rights to use the the “little bit nutty, little bit slutty’’ defense…
/r/MensRights18/06/14 08:04 PM
1

Sorry, you lost me. My post was about right-wingers attacking Hillary for being a hypocrite -- for hating women back when she defended an accused rapist. My point is that too many are acting as if what she did back then was wrong. Honestly, I am wondering why I bother with this subreddit.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 05:14 PM
13

I don't care if she's lying. He's a boy, and she's a teacher. Nagging for sex is not a punishable offense.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 04:11 PM
1

It deserves to be mentioned the same way I point out their hypocrisy re: Julan Assange and Al Gore when they were accused of sexual assault. Remember that? At COTWA and False Rape Society before that, I pointed out their hypocrisy many times. The problem is when we write as if we think Hillary was wrong back then. Some conservative pundits are doing that. What's wrong is radical feminism's hostility to due process NOW. It is fair to point out that even Hillary Clinton gave her client a robust de…
/r/MensRights18/06/14 02:44 PM
1

My site: http://www.cotwa.info/ "I'm not sure what we are arguing at this point." I can't be any clearer. Sorry: http://www.cotwa.info/2014/06/right-wing-parrots-radical-feminisms.html
/r/MensRights18/06/14 02:31 PM
2

Do you not read my site? Seriously? I write more about this than anyone in America - and that's not an exaggeration. Without me, I think it is fair to say that a lot of people who read this subreddit would never have heard of the April 4, 2011 "Dear Colleague" letter.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 02:14 PM
3

Wait, wait, wait. I didn't build any "straw man." I simply read your plain words. Someone is a "rape apologist" for defending a presumptively innocent man accused of rape? What I assume you mean is that by feminist standards, she was a rape apologist. Make that clear. Your plain and unambiguous words suggest you buy into the radical feminist zaniness that it is "rape apology" to defend the presumptively innocent. Some right-wingers have a sorry history of getting "tough on rape" (at the expense …
/r/MensRights18/06/14 01:49 PM
3

The last thing anyone should do is discourage feminists from defending presumptively innocent men accused of rape. Hillary Clinton's long record on the national stage furnishes plenty of ammunition for her opponents -- from Whitewater to her tall-tale about landing in Bosnia under sniper fire to the security lapses in Benghazi. Larry David -- no conservative -- mocked her famous 2008 television ad about the phone ringing in the White House at 3 a.m.: "Here's an idea for an Obama ad: a montage of…
/r/MensRights18/06/14 01:42 PM
2

You seem to be buying into the right wing zaniness that suggests she should not have defended a man accused of rape.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 01:37 PM
2

What you should be attacking are the radical feminists who disdain due process when it comes to rape. The instance you cite is one where a feminist actually defended a rape victim. Point out the hypocrisy; point out the double standards. But don't malign anyone's defense of the presumptively innocent in and of itself.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 01:35 PM
5

Fine. Point the hypocrisy. Don't act like those memes have validity.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 01:32 PM
6

What does that mean, "extremely relevant"? That it's somehow appropriate to "use their own memes" against them? Fine with me -- point out the double standards, point out the hypocrisy. But do NOT pretend that those memes have validity in and of themselves. Do NOT pretend that it is somehow wrong for a public defender to, you know, actually defend his or her client. Do NOT toss due process onto a scrapheap of indifference when it comes to rape just to malign someone you don't like. Instead of dow…
/r/MensRights18/06/14 01:26 PM
4

As the blogger who spends a lot of time speaking up for the wrongly accused, your post does no favors for presumptively innocent men accused of rape. http://www.cotwa.info/2014/06/right-wing-parrots-radical-feminisms.html
/r/MensRights18/06/14 01:21 PM
2

What did I leave out? And what do I say in longer posts that is unnecessary?
/r/MensRights18/06/14 01:14 PM
6

Yes.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 07:11 PM
1

As I pointed out elsewhere, a lot of colleges that used the clear and convincing standard were charging men with rape for engaging in mutually drunken sex -- to me, that's THE big issue in the whole field -- and Brett Sokolow has told his feminist-leaning school clients they are discriminating against men. While I have serious differences with him on critical points and think he's tilted the pendulum too far away from due process, isn't the MRA community committed to fairness for both men and wo…
/r/MensRights13/06/14 08:29 PM
1

Do you know how many schools used the "lower level of guilt" before April 4, 2011? Most. Do you know how many people complained about it? I can't name one. Do you know how many men made decisions about which school to attend based on which used a "preponderance of the evidence" versus "clear and convincing evidence" standard? I am sure none. All due respect, but most of the readers here would never have heard of Brett Sokolow if I hadn't slammed him years ago on False Rape Society. I was wrong. …
/r/MensRights13/06/14 07:51 PM
1

As I explained above, most serious people who study these issues and who are not ideologues recognize that the odds were stacked against rape victims in days gone by. Those same people also believe the pendulum has shifted too far in recent years. I do not think it is wrong, or distasteful, to advocate for both rape victims and the presumptively innocent accused of rape. I, personally, think it's the ideal. The goal should be justice, regardless of the gender of the victim or the type of harm in…
/r/MensRights13/06/14 12:55 PM
5

The sexual assault milieu is replete with advocates who strike no balance, who believe false rape claims are a myth, and who never met a rape accuser they didn't believe. Here we have someone in a very influential position who is advocating fairness for the wrongly accused in terms stronger than COTWA -- and no, I'm not kidding -- yet we aren't embracing him? We're maligning him because he doesn't believe exactly what we believe? Seriously?
/r/MensRights13/06/14 04:29 AM
4

I think it's too easy to dismiss Brett as someone talking out of both sides of his mouth. Respectfully, I don't think it's fair. Most serious people who study these issues and who are not ideologues recognize that the odds were stacked against rape victims in days gone by. Those same people also believe the pendulum has shifted too far in recent years. I do not think it is wrong, or distasteful, to advocate for both rape victims and the presumptively innocent accused of rape. I, personally, thin…
/r/MensRights13/06/14 04:18 AM
9

He's a feminist who says men are being screwed on some issues because they are men, and he's working to fight that. I think it's great. Finally someone in a position to actually do something is doing something.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 09:36 PM
2

You're kidding, right? Brett has taken on 11 male clients since April. Who knows how many he has in total. Name me one MRA doing more.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 09:26 PM
11

First, he's representing at least 11 guys right now -- he's taken on 11 male clients since April, and who knows how many more he has. Count 'em, eleven. He's not sitting around bitching on a blog or on Reddit. He's actually helping young men who've been wronged. He's doing more than I have ever done. Second, before the Dear Colleague letter, do you know how many schools applied the preponderance of the evidence standard? Most. http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=Bc0yAAAAIBAJ&sjid=IaYEAAAAIBAJ&p…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 09:23 PM
2

That's one reason these cases are so difficult. Rapists rarely admit their crimes.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 06:49 PM
10

Am chuckling -- already a down vote. I know I have some detractors, but those aside, who would downvote this? If this is a men's rights advocate downvoting, they should rethink their position. Read the article: he's currently fighting eleven schools on behalf of men. That's what you call advocacy. He's actually out doing something.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 06:45 PM
1

Then the "rapist" is not a rapist, right?
/r/MensRights12/06/14 06:42 PM
5

He's a feminist, but he may just be the MRA of the year.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 06:22 PM
17

I upvote your comment for the kindness you've extended. I am not in a position to do what Brett is able to do. In addition, when Brett advocates for fairness to male students, you have to take it very seriously, given his advocacy for sexual assault victims. I was wrong about him.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 06:17 PM
5

http://www.cotwa.info/2012/03/legal-infirmities-to-punishing-sexual.html
/r/MensRights12/06/14 06:14 PM
1

Are you saying a rapist has a duty to consent? To what? S/he is the one doing the raping.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 05:46 PM
19

You are right. The persons who dictate the public discourse on these issues are ginning up the outrage because no one cares enough. I think I'll modify my post. Thanks.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 02:36 PM
11

Here we go! We can't talk about the Catholic church without the haters crawling out of the woodwork to play the pedophile card. Yes, yes, yes, it is a stain on the church. And I repeat, the Catholic Church has done more charity work than any organization in the history of the world. But thanks for derailing the conversation to malign the church.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 01:10 AM
6

You don't have to be an MRA to recognize the hostility he's talking about.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 10:29 PM
4

Catholic Church has its issues, but it has done more charity work than any organization in the history of the world.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 10:28 PM
2

Exactly!
/r/MensRights10/06/14 10:26 PM
2

You need a good civil litigator. These cases are not rocket science. And it doesn't have to be on a pure contingent fee -- it can be on a hybrid fee structure, with the student paying the lawyer a small hourly rate (even 50$ an hour) and giving him a percentage at the end.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 10:26 PM
2

In this field? When young men are deprived of their due process rights, they need to sue. Period. Activism doesn't work. College presidents don't like explaining to their Boards of Trustees why they are paying hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees every year.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 10:22 PM
2

Would be nice to be a paper mason. The practice of law would be great if it weren't for the clients.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 05:51 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter