I see a lot of videos by Red Pill men discussing how "modern women " focus too much on getting an education and waste their "most valuable years" in college when they should be marrying "hvm". They say men don't care about a woman's degrees or job title, just her youth and appearance. They also throw in how divorce rates are 50% (exaggerated to 60)and how these "entitled educated women " marry past their prime which makes the "juice not worth the squeeze ".

However, data shows college educated women who marry after 25 and hold a career only have a 20% chance of divorce. Just having a college degree alone brings the divorce rate from 53% to 29%(Bureau of labor).

This rate(20%) is even lower than Christian divorce rates (24%).

Article:

"The commonly quoted numbers are overstated myths, the more accurate numbers reflect complex factors, and that our society really has two very separate divorce rates, a lower rate (by half) for college-educated women who marry after the age of 25 and a much higher rate for poor, primarily minority women who marry before the age of 25 and do not have a college degree. (Most of the research focused on women; the little I read about men suggested similar outcomes.)"

Source: https://psychcentral.com/lib/the-myth-of-the-high-rate-of-divorce#1

This is also why divorce is at a 50 year low. It's called the "marriage divide". The main people getting married today are the same one's who always had low divorce rates: college educated, older and middle to upper class.

Source: https://ifstudies.org/blog/the-us-divorce-rate-has-hit-a-50-year-low

This being said, why don't they attack uneducated, younger and lower employed women? So much ire is directed at the opposite end of the spectrum. The women more likely to stay and even less likely to end up with alimony if divorced are educated and accomplished. So much hate is directed at women trying to improve their lives.

Why the fear mongering? The logic doesn't make sense.