TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Warner Bros. Rumored to Delete All Amber Heard Scenes in 'Aquaman 2'

MakeADeathWish

June 6, 2022
3927 upvotes
/r/PussyPassDenied
https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/warner-bros-rumored-delete-amber-041559772.html
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Warner Bros. Rumored to Delete All Amber Heard Scenes in 'Aquaman 2'
Author

MakeADeathWish

Upvotes 3927
Comments 260
Date June 6, 2022 1:08 PM UTC
(4 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/PussyPassDenied
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/pussypassdenied/comments/v635nl/warner_bros_rumored_to_delete_all_amber_heard/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/PussyPassDenied/warner-bros-rumored-to-delete-all-amber-heard.1117026
https://theredarchive.com/post/1117026

Comments

[–]PigButter 839 points840 points841 points 4 years ago (47 children) | Copy Link

Next do the original Aquaman so I can finally watch it.

[–]StaysAwakeAllWeek 365 points366 points367 points 4 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link

Somebody should deepfake it with Emilia Clarke

[–]ghostfreckle611 224 points225 points226 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Nah, the petition to get Bruce Campbell to replace Turd has way more votes. Over 3 million from what I’ve heard.

Give the people what they want.

[–]Devidose 52 points53 points54 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Can never go wrong with The Chin!

[–]Onlyanidea1 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

My easiest fap ever. Think he's what made me realize how much I like men when I saw him in his earliest movies. So much Charisma, confidence, and down right good hair. Shame I'll never find a man willing to strap on a chainsaw in the bedroom...

[–]ghostfreckle611 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

r/holup

[–]StaysAwakeAllWeek 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

He's talking about aquaman 1. They aren't going to reshoot that whole movie now.

[–]factorV 17 points18 points19 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

yea that would be like making another batman reboot

[–]Joverby 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Way better than eyebrow emote lady

[–]DejectedContributor 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I second Bruce Campbell, but I want a scene of him giving birth to a fish or whatever Aquababies look like.

[+]redhandsblackfuture -15 points-14 points-13 points 4 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Aren't they a guy now?

[–]ILoveCrackCocaine69 19 points20 points21 points 4 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

you might be thinking of ellen page

[–]redhandsblackfuture 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh I'm confusing her with Ellen/Elliot Page yessir

[–]fiercealmond 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Deadnaming reeeeee you need to pretend they never had a different name or else you're denying their existence!

[–]Ultravioletgray 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Here's something weird to me, E. Page hosted SNL quite a ways back when he was still Ellen Page, but they renamed the episode in the hulu description as Elliot instead of Ellen. Isn't that the opposite of deadnaming? He was still going by the name Ellen and identified as a woman at the time, so changing that in the description to their current identity is just false info, right?

[–]fiercealmond 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Don't expect me to make sense of this for you...

[–]donuts96[🍰] 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

"They"....Jesus christ lol

[+]redhandsblackfuture -27 points-26 points-25 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

That's one of the pronouns Elliot Page chose for themselves yes. What's the issue?

[–]Operario1 points 4 years ago* [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

We don't give a shit about that. She'll always be a she, no matter how much she likes to pretend otherwise.

[+]chrisbutler11 -26 points-25 points-24 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You don't give a shit about that. I'd say the majority do.

[–]4gotOldU-name 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

And you would be mistaken. Just because some feel it to be important, I'd venture to bet that the majority don't give AF and likely prefer to not even know about whatever person is deciding to fight biology -- because contrary to what Reddit and some media outlets would like you to believe, most people actually don't care at all, either way.

[–]a7x2319 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah to me she will always be a she. I still can’t wrap my head around calling someone they if it’s just one person and I’m not even a boomer I’m in my 20s

[–]donuts96[🍰] 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Simply put, it's retarded

[–]Vlyde 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If the new Mera isn't Danny Devito I don't want any of it.

[–]jeffwingersballs -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'd rather have Heard in the movie.

[–]Caza390 19 points20 points21 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just pirate it. So you’re not supporting WB for their cuck of a move but you can still watch

[–]De-Hond 34 points35 points36 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It would still suck. It's like powerrangers for waterpeople.

[–]Top_Rekt 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's AquaMorbin time.

[–]DejectedContributor 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Power Ranger watersports? Dude's over here inventing brand new porn categories...

[–]PigButter 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

NO SPOILERS! ;-)

[–]SofaSnizzle 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

Why would you want to watch it even without her, come on Aquaman is the pussy of all super heroes

[–]Diablo516- 34 points35 points36 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

He was until Jason Momoa was cast

[–]CyborgKungFu 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The Deep made him a legend.

[–]Dwayne_dibbly 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Not really, the flash has to be the worst.

How can we sort out this gang of thugs with guns.....

I the flash will run really really fast, won't do anything but hey I am really really fast.

[–]fiercealmond 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

The flash is cool but not with this weenie they have playing him. Being really fast means he can do all kinds of weird physics-breaking stuff. Aquaman will still always be a soggy fish whisperer.

[–]hotdogsandhangovers 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The weenie who keeps beating people up in real life?

[–]fiercealmond 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah; what a weenie.

[–]NationalRock 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Imagine him as a porn star

[–]fiercealmond 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

"Im sorry it was so quick, its just that you're so hot... i swear it wont happen again" length - 0:0:28

[–]HeroGothamKneads 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Are you serious? The Flash could make it so they were never born in the first place.

[–]Mecha_Derp 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What do you think happens when something hits you moving really really fast

Think of a bullet except larger and faster

[–]PigButter 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

He could still kick The Deep's ass. ;-)

[–]SofaSnizzle -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The actor or the fictional character?

[–]PigButter 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yes

[–]SofaSnizzle -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe¿

[–]quit_ye_bullshit 563 points564 points565 points 4 years ago (61 children) | Copy Link

Well she has already been paid. Not really that much of a denial.

[–]Walshy231231 409 points410 points411 points 4 years ago (30 children) | Copy Link

On the other hand, it would help set precedence for not hiring her for anything in the future

[–]quit_ye_bullshit 237 points238 points239 points 4 years ago (29 children) | Copy Link

Oh definitely. She is basically nuclear waste to any potential film or show.

[–]JayMeadows 221 points222 points223 points 4 years ago (28 children) | Copy Link

Until some obscure female-only TV station hires her and brags about how they "Helped save her career" after misogynistic Hollywood abandoned her or some shit.

[–]Tureni 137 points138 points139 points 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

…only to realize that most of her salary gets garnished by Johnny for the rest of her life :-)

[–]mambiki 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Can you garnish for civil suits? I thought only a limited set of circumstances can trigger garnishment. And this isnt one of them? Or is it state by state?

[–]xrandx 65 points66 points67 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Yes with process. More importantly since the verdict was 'with malice' the judgement can't be discharged by bankruptcy.

[–]mambiki 23 points24 points25 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Uh, that’s a nice touch.

[–]Vlyde 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

INAL however just curious. Isn't there a limit for bankruptcy? Like for people you have to make less then a certain amount (which is on the 6 figures) you can't file for bankruptcy. Which she wouldn't be able to do with having a high enough revenue previously? I know companies and people are different, but Amber Turd isn't a company so I hope this lawsuit actually obliterates her financial standing and credit score (since she will probably pledge her payments for that too).

Regardless, she made that bed, now she has to shit in it. I bet she's going to as many high profile celebrities as she can for support lmfao.

[–]xrandx 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No you can declare bankruptcy if you owe a dollar, but it's a court that discharges your debt and this one like student loans cannot be forgiven. She can't pay what she doesn't have but Depp can garnish all but subsistence levels of her wages and seize any property she owns until the debt is satisfied.

She just bought a house in Mexico for cash which is not subject to those laws. It's likely she was positioning herself for an out of jurisdiction life knowing she's utterly wrecked in the USA.

[–]Impulsive94 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How has that happened though? Surely assets should be frozen until there's a judgement? I understand they'd allow cost of living etc but buying a house on Mexico is clearly her trying to avoid giving that much value in assets to Johnny?

I don't know the US too well or the laws but it's clear as day she's done that to move money out of his & the courts' reach. I'd expect there'd be a way to claw that back in some way immediately.

[–]StoryAboutABridge 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You certainly can in Canada

[–]publicbigguns 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What about the moon? Can you do it there?

[–]4gotOldU-name 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why ask about the moon? C'mon, man..... The real place to ask about is the multiverse.

[–]quit_ye_bullshit 44 points45 points46 points 4 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Nah she will probably just start streaming or selling cadids on OF. Or announce an NFT collab.

Edit: This can probably be a bingo game at this point.

[–]tharkyllinus 35 points36 points37 points 4 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

She could do porn. There are the thirsty.

[–]ThePigmanAgain 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Eeeew! Can you imagine the kind of porn she'd get hired for now that she's picked up the nickname "Amber Turd"?

[–]tharkyllinus 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Probably go like this " Essen mien sheisse."

[–]deanreevesii 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Dude, that IS Cartman's mom!

[–]tharkyllinus 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep

[–]zeroxcero 40 points41 points42 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

1 girl 1 bed

[–]sirmav 64 points65 points66 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

One Heard, One Turd

[–]mz3 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So, ASMR?

[–]sirmav 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Kinda like that

[–]False_Rhythms 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Omfg, I'm laughing so hard at this comment

[–]tharkyllinus 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Give her a big fist shaped dildo stuck to the floor.

[–]notintopain 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Plus the fecal matter.

[–]Dhexodus 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Then she can finally go fuck herself.

[–]TaintedPills 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Τhen report her to the IRS because undeclared income

[–]rnavstar 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Probably end up on the View?

[–]cyanydeez 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

like a female version of OAN

[–]SleepDeprivedUserUK 55 points56 points57 points 4 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Well she has already been paid

Excellent, that means that she can afford to pay Johnny :D

[–]bigflamingtaco 31 points32 points33 points 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Dude, she's not THAT high of a lister.

Her pay was $2mil, but they may be able to get her for breach of contract for having to remove her scenes due to public pressure. It will probably come down to how willing the union is to back her up. They'd have a pretty solid case if she completed the contract in its entirety (when to show up, what days, prepared, etc), but I doubt they'd want the publicity of fighting for a pariah.

[–]SleepDeprivedUserUK 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Oh I know she won't be able to pay it all, but if she has money, it should be taken to appease the court ordered fine.

[–]bigflamingtaco 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I like a little garnish on my paycheck 🤣

[–]Hatedpriest 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Can they garnish the pay of a parsley farmer? JC...

[–]yooolmao 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I dunno, the MLB ref union has been backing up Angel Hernandez for over a decade now and he is as close to shit wearing an ump uniform as it gets.

[–]radios_appear 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hey, you get the contract you negotiate. If the MLB boxed themselves into a corner where they have no leverage or means to get rid of an ump, fuck them.

Give the NFLPA shit for letting Goddell play god and give the MLB shit for being impotent on umps

[–]ThePigmanAgain 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Is the two mill an advance on two percent of the gross, though? If so, it would be a lot more.

[–]NaughtyFred 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

There's no way Amber has the "Star Power" to negotiate a percentage of the gross. That's exclusively an A-Lister thing.

[–]ThePigmanAgain 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Wow. Things have declined. There was a time when the lead getting ten percent meant their co-star would have gotten a couple of points, but apparently those days are gone.

[–]bigflamingtaco 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

They don't see 10% unless they are deeply involved in the project, but these days 2% can bring home more than 10% did two decades ago, even with inflation.

Getting a percect of the proceeds isn't something you want to do when you are on Heard's level as you are going to lose a huge chunk of your pay to get it, and if the movie doesn't do great (and even sometimes when it does), creative accounting will occur and you will walk away with exactly zero of the earnings.

Sometimes an actor will take earnings in lieu of a large paycheck just so they can be in a movie, often because they have a passion for something in or related to the story, or to help a friend complete a project or get that person's name on the books.

[–]MrStruggleSnuggle 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Getting a percect of the proceeds isn't something you want to do when you are on Heard's level as you are going to lose a huge chunk of your pay to get it, and if the movie doesn't do great (and even sometimes when it does), creative accounting will occur and you will walk away with exactly zero of the earnings.

What the "creative accounting" did to the Forrest Gump creator was absolutely despicable. When they went to him to turn the sequel into a movie he told them to fuck off because of it.

[–]Empyrealist 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Its actually huge. Getting paid for doing less or no [published] work as an actor is standard. People end up on the editing floor all the time. Its how contracts work. She DID the work, and deserves to be paid for it.

However, if she gets cut completely because of all the negative press, this will be a serious blow against her and her career. Her Q score is turning into shit.

[–]yooolmao 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Now they just need to remove her as ambassador for the ACLU for women's rights and we'll be getting somewhere.

[–]JakeDC 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Won't happen. The ACLU has really fallen.

[–]JohnLockeNJ 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

She might get to keep the money, but if she’s completely cut she can’t ever say she was in the movie, right? And no IMDb entry?

[–]Empyrealist 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thats a great question. I don't think she will get a credit if she's not seen or heard in any way. She would still get a credit if they use a flashback scene from the previous movie.

But that doesn't mean that she cant get a credit. That would depend on the kindness of the studio or what's in her contract.

[–]Excellent_Check8155 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's a good denial. Pretty much ends her a-list chances.

[–]Medval91 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

I know that everything is under contract but is it possible to get their money back since the contract wasn’t fulfilled?

[–]Masteroflimes 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Johnny Depp had the same for Fantastic beats. And Kevin Spacey for All the money in the world

[–]quit_ye_bullshit 46 points47 points48 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Well the contract would have been fulfilled because she did her job. It is not up to her to decide whatever makes the cut. She could literally earn royalties without even being in the movie if that's how she structured her contract.

[–]Medval91 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah you are right

[–]m4xc4v413r4 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I can guarantee she has zero royalties. She's a nobody, in this day and age WB would never give royalties to a B- list actress for a secondary role. She has no leverage on her contract, if she didn't accept everything they gave her as they gave her they would just go "next" and get 50 other actresses for the role in the same day. And we have no idea if she's getting paid even if she already did her job, this kind of negative publicity to the movie might be a breach. These guys don't joke about this shit, they have hundreds of millions invested and over a billion of potential earnings that might not happen because of something like this, if this movie does much worse than what they're expecting they will destroy her.

[–]quit_ye_bullshit -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If she already did her job? The movie is already shot. She did her job and will definitely get paid for it if she hasn't already.

[–]m4xc4v413r4 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's not how that works, we don't know the clauses of her contract, if she broke any of them the contract is void, and she didn't do her job, her job isn't to shot the movie, her job is to fulfill the contract. And since we know literally nothing of her contract, saying she will or won't get paid is purely speculation.

[–]Diablo516- 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Johnny still got paid for Crimes against grindewald

[–]Jocta 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

it was tho

[–]Medval91 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I know I thought that maybe it could be reverse, but everything is completed.

[–]Lord_Shisui 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm not so sure about that. This was her big breakthrough movie. And now she's not a part of it.

[–]TipMeinBATtokens 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hope she saved some of it for paying Depp off.

[–]NowFreeToMaim 156 points157 points158 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Funny they were gonna keep her in, then only “ 10 min” of her while the trial was going, then now that she lost, she’s all the way out.

This was Pass denial by way of backlash/low ticket sale avoidance. If they treated this like the genders were reversed. They’dve cut the guy all the way out day one and then readjusted, maybe, if it turned out he won.

Shes fuckin done though.

https://ew.com/movies/aquaman-2-wont-remove-amber-heard-because-of-johnny-depp-fans/

https://movieweb.com/amber-heard-rumored-reduced-screen-time-aquaman-2/

[–]Luxifer1983 304 points305 points306 points 4 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

Rumored? Spread it only when it became real

[–]MakeADeathWish[S] 57 points58 points59 points 4 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

Should i delete?

[–]SGRiggall 51 points52 points53 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

I doubt you’re the first or last person to spread rumours on Reddit, as the Beatles said, let it be, it’s only regarding some wanker who did her fella wrong and now a shit film she was in is getting made better or worse (you decide) by removing her, aquaman will be remembered for one thing and it’s not how good it is!

[–]throwaway_XXXX2 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Aquaman has never been that good, or remembered that much

[–]plasmaflare34 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

A hero with all the powers of Spongebob. Yay...

[–]CyborgKungFu 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

That’s what makes him so great. He bides his time and takes his punches. He will indeed have the last laugh when the polar ice caps melt permanently and the oceans remain the planet.

[–]plasmaflare34 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

If the polar ice caps melt, the plankton in the oceans will almost all die, rendering all the fish dead as well...

[–]CyborgKungFu 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Then they start harvesting us.

[–]throwaway_XXXX2 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Either all hyoomans ded or christophercolumbusizing some big ass rock on space

[–]Wonkarosa -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I heard the Beatles didn’t write that song. Bob Dylan was a ghost writer for them.

[–]Altibadass 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Paul McCartney's always said 'Let it Be' came to him in a dream of his late mother, so unless Bob Dylan was up to some Freddy Krueger shit, that seems unlikely for this one

[–]CttCJim 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you follow the link trail back, the origin is a tweet

https://mobile.twitter.com/TheComixKid/status/1532762887462064129

The source that your source links describes them as a "reliable Insider". I'm too lazy to research more than that because I'm almost done in the bathroom.

[–]Pojorobo 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nah, rumors are good, I think if we spread rumors on this subject like they are real they can create a self fulfilling prophecy. Like if WB are considering it than sees the internet excited over a rumor it might happen they might pull the trigger and give her the boot.

[–]BlondBadBoy69 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Don’t delete

[–]MakeADeathWish[S] 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ok....i posted it bc even tho she got paid, being deleted out if a big tent movie is a way of saying you'll be denied future gigs like that....

[–]Diablo516- 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nah, you specifically said rumors, which is true

[–]DesertFart 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Around here someone can fart in the morning and by supper time they shit their pants

[–]SC2samspends too much time spreading u/cicero44's ass cheeks apart 100 points101 points102 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That is way too little too late. They knew of the accusations against her years ahead of time and did absolutely nothing. They've still done absolutely nothing as this is just a rumor.

However, they severed Johnny Depp's ties pretty much as soon as they could. No problems waiting on that one. Even though there was no proof of her accusations against HIM. HE however did have plenty of evidence of her abuse against him but they didn't give a shit at all.

There was 0 loyalty or support given to him so why should anyone ever support anything from Warner Brothers?

[–]carlbandit 27 points28 points29 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She should have been cut soon as the trial was decided in Depp's favour, but not before.

Depp also shouldn't have been let go based on accusations alone.

[–]Zaruz 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, people shouldn't be getting dropped based off accusations. It should happen once a verdict is reached, which is what's happened here if it's true.

The key point to this that makes it problematic, is that the same should have applied to Depp.

[–]Notmenomore 56 points57 points58 points 4 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

I just can't believe they made a sequel after that first piece of shit movie.

[–]Diablo516- 28 points29 points30 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

It was bad, but not Wonder Woman 1984 bad

[–]DoctorWH0877 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We don't talk about that

[–]Theslootwhisperer 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I'm a good public and I'll watch most anything that's up my alley if there's a couple known names and good production value. Wonder woman though, I just couldn't wait for it to end.

[–]DC_Disrspct_Popeyes 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It was almost surreal

[–]jessehechtcreative 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I did like Pedro Pascal’s portions. If edited and cut right, it would make an okay Twilight Zone scenario. Everything else was a toxic waste of time though.

[–]Diablo516- 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I was really bummed because I genuinely liked the first one. The mistake was letting Jenkins write the thing. She's a pretty good director but HORRIBLE writer.

[–]Demonae 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Didn't you watch the trial, it was the "Greatest Movie of All Time!" according to Amber's team and witnesses.

[–]therecanbeonlywan 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Objection, hearsay

[–]buzzmandt 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Objection, foundation

[–]outhouse_wholesaler 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Well it made like 1 billion dollars, of course they’re going to make another one. But yeah, from memory it wasn’t anything special.

[–]Notmenomore 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh yeah, from a business perspective I get why they made a sequel.

What I should have said was - I can't believe people would want to see the sequel after the first one.

[–]hessian_for_hire 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm with you - I couldn't even finish the first one.

[–]TheMcWhopper -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

That first piece of shit movie made over a billion dollars 🤦

[–]Notmenomore 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Meh...That doesn't mean anything when ticket prices are the most expensive now as they've ever been. It's another super hero movie; it made money. No shock there.

What I'm really interested in is how many actual tickets were sold, and how many will sell for the sequel in comparison to the first.

[–]TheMcWhopper 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Well, considering in the entire history of film, only 47 films have made a billion or more. It definitely means something

[–]Notmenomore 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Lol idk why you care so much. All that means is that a lot of people went to see it. Doesn't mean it's any good.

[–]TheMcWhopper -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I never said it was good. You asked why they made a sequel and I pointed out it made a billion. Hence why a sequel was greenlit 🤦. You really are at the top of the bell curve.

[–]Notmenomore 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I didn't ask anything, lol. My response to another....

"Oh yeah, from a business perspective I get why they made a sequel.

What I should have said was - I can't believe people would want to see the sequel after the first one."

Can't wait to see the next one flop in comparison.

[–]MrStruggleSnuggle 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We are definitely in a time where taking a billion dollars is basically the expectation for a big budget mainstream movie, so I get where that person is coming from, but yeh it's not the standard just yet.

[–]SopieMunky 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Too little too late. Most people I know have already decided to outright boycott this movie months ago.

[–]WinchesterWaifu 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Never saw the first one and never planned to set the second all because of her.

[–]polerize 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Finally taking steps to try to avoid a flop. But too little too late.

[–]atomoicman 36 points37 points38 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Good. Wasn’t gonna watch it w her in it

[–]tanis_ivy 51 points52 points53 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Don't watch it anyway. Look how long they took to make a decision.

[–]atomoicman 19 points20 points21 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You’re right, and she probably was already paid for what scenes she did do. I’ll pass on the whole movie

[–]FernDiggy 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Great choice. Move wasn’t that good anyways. No need to waste your time with it

[–]ShoshinMizu -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

i didnt even know she was actually in movies

[–]atomoicman 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Bc neither did I, TIL she played in ZombieLand as the girl in 406. That one of my favorite movies. I DO NOT recall her being in it but there she is.

And here I am, thinking her “actress” title was just self proclaimed

[–]WinchesterWaifu 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I loooove ZombieLand and was pissed when my hubby told me she was in it. At least we get to watch her get beat down in that movie, lol.

[–]pofshrimp 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What a storyline it must have if you can just erase a character from it

[–]Demon1968 38 points39 points40 points 4 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

It's rumoured, but the executive already testified that she was cut down to a few minutes at the start and end of the film, so why bother? She already got paid, so all cutting those few minutes will do is allow a soulless corporation to virtue signal for a couple days.

[–]StaysAwakeAllWeek 21 points22 points23 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

The point is to prevent a boycott. At this point it is all about them taking the route that loses the fewest ticket sales. If they think keeping their mouths shut and leaving her in is the least damaging they'll do it. But if they think she's too radioactive to leave in they will cut her. The situation is far too polarised for them to want to virtue signal, as whatever they say will offend one side.

[+]Demon1968 -12 points-11 points-10 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

All they have to do is say that they are cutting any future checks that should arise directly to the fund that will be responsible for paying the judgement to Johnny Depp. That way they keep the Depp fans happy, and can claim to be helping Hurd to keep the left wing media that currently are having a meltdown happy too.

[–]unklestinky 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

that's not how the world works

[–]Demon1968 -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It is. Her bankruptcy filing puts future earnings into escrow until a judgement is made.

[–]unklestinky 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

When did she file for bankruptcy? Regardless, that's not how the world works. Warner Brothers can't set up an account and place her earnings in an account for Johnny Depp as you suggested.

That's fan fiction.

[–]Jimmi11 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe she just 'pledged' bankruptcy?

[–]Demon1968 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Warner won't make an account, the court will. Bankruptcy protection comes at some cost. Heard will have her future income, and current spending, under close court supervision, and often future income with undecided fates goes to an escrow account controlled by court appointed trustees.

[–]Kozak170 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Least delusional redditor

[–]CeleritasLucis 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

so why bother?

Because bad PR. People will keep insisting WB to delete those scenes even if it for 1 min.

What I think are they gonna do is keep the rumours alive, and delete the scenes just before the release to create controversy and increase sales.

[+]Demon1968 -7 points-6 points-5 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

As I mentioned to another, they can just announce any future money owed her will go to the fund paying the Depp judgement so his fans get a little win, and the crazy Hurd supporting media can get a little win too.

[–]unklestinky 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Come on man... get with reality. Warner Brothers can't just decide not to pay her what is owed to her per the negotiated contract and give that money to Johnny Depp instead.

Stop it with the fan fiction.

[–]Demon1968 -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

She already got what was owed to her to date, and her bankruptcy filing this week puts future earnings into escrow til a judgement is made. That is reality.

[–]unklestinky 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

you're literally making things up dude. How the debt is settled will be negotiated between Depps attorneys and Heards attorneys. It won't be up to Warner Brothers to intervene.

Stop making things up

[–]Demon1968 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

She appealed the decision, filed for bankruptcy protection of her property and assets. Future earnings, not current, will be under control of the court as will her budgeted spending that must be approved. Never said Warner's would make the decision, they just need to frame what they would be doing in a way that makes the average person who does not deal with things like this feel better about handing over their money.

[–]unklestinky 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

you're literally making things up dude. She has not yet filed an appeal. She has not filed for bankruptcy. You're making up how future earnings will be allocated. You're crazy if you think a company like Warner Brothers is going to tell people they are going to give Depp her earnings....

Like, stop with all this fan fiction.

[–]jonnytechno 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This whole thread and article are about a rumour, Ambers legal team have mentioned she intends on appealing so while it may not have been filed yet but its an equal stretch to say theyre lying ... also given its known her net worth is below what is owed she may well have to declare bankruptcy, however most probably the person you were replying to is just too deep in the youtube/tabloid rumour mills

[–]rustytoerail 27 points28 points29 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Plus she won't get publicity, exposure, or get credited

[–]KorranHalcyon 35 points36 points37 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She has had more publicity this year than any other female celebrity.

[–]Demon1968 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She will get a hundred times more publicity for being removed than ten minutes of background screen time. Plus even if removed she still will get credited, look at Endgame credits, there were about thirty people cut from the movie that still got credited.

[–]Jocta 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

allow a soulless corporation to virtue signal for a couple days

the best month to do it too

[–]Demon1968 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Especially since Amber came out as lesbian a couple of years ago.

[–]MrStruggleSnuggle 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

so all cutting those few minutes will do is allow a soulless corporation to virtue signal for a couple days.

Unfortunately that's basically required by "soulless corporations" at this stage, because if they don't they'll get abused by the ultra "woke" outrage lovers.

[–]TelayRanner 34 points35 points36 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Inefficient Warner Bros. Recut the movie so that she is revealed to be a villain.

[–]unklestinky 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

recut the movie and replace her with Johnny Depp in a red wig.

[–]lifepuzzler 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This would be the best way. And have her CGI-double unceremoniously die in a big fight that reveals that she wasn't ACTUALLY the villain, she was just a minion.

Perfect way to minimize her character.

[–]Manbearpig9801 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Unpopular opinion, maybe.

Let it be, death of the artist and all. Seems they only make moves once the court of public opinion moves in a certain way. Pretty sure thats called pandering.

Aquaman probably sucks anyway.

[–]SweetSlowKiss 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm not watching that floating turd no matter who's in it.

[–]xX_DRUMZ_Xx 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

About time, next delete Ezra miller

[–]TheWildColonialBoy1 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Still not gonna watch either.

[–]BalloonBollicks 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If its good for the goose, its good for the gander... Jonny got fucked on a lot of his biggest stuff, seems only fair after the debacle we were forced to witness everywhere we turned.

[–]VLHACS 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She'll double down and continue to say this yet another blow against women rights unfortunately. Which ironically dilutes and softens the movement even further. Wish she would just take the L and go away.

[–]scarboroughwa 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Rumoured? Wtf is that?

With a guy, just at the accusation stage he’s completely cancelled.

She is a proven domestic abuser.

[–]Fist4achin 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Boy, she really shit the bed now.

[–]SleepDeprivedUserUK 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Has she donated that money to the charity she promised she would yet?

[–]ronoda12 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Scumbags like amber turd should be banned from hollywood

[–]oppy1984 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just Poochie her out of the film and say she died on her way to her home planet.

[–]Soft_Leather_Couch 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Still not getting my money because it took them this long to remove her even though they had evidence of her being violent towards a spouse.

[–]sync303 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Just delete the whole movie it's fucking terrible.

[–]icchifanni 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, it is, I tried to like it, but as you say it’s just fucking shit.

[–]notaliberal1of1 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

well gosh that would be fair, since she tried to have depp erased

[–]speedway65 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Gold diggin’ self battering poop porn. Easy

[–]2Hours2Late 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Saddest part is while the movie will be made better because of this, it will still suck no matter what.

[–]ClamatoDiver 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Don't kill the character, Mera is more powerful than Authur is and there are lots of possibilities for future use.

Just don't mention her, make her unavailable somehow, and recast her for any future appearances.

[–]thejynxed 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well yeah, Arthur is only half-Atlantean and she's full. His daddy just happened to be king.

[–]will9630 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Unless China wants her in the movie.

[–]MightySapiens 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is them floating the idea, don't get fooled, don't celebrate

[–]Fanboysblow 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Imagine how it would go,

"Who's in that movie?"

"Amber Heard,"

"Amber Heard? You mean the nut who took a shit in Johnny Depps' bed?"

[–]Hollywood_Hair 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nah keep em, learn from your foolish mistakes.

[–]niijuuichi 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol warner bros. Only after she lost the trial. U suck

[–]Vast-Silver 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If they deepfake Depp into the role of Mera in the original, id buy that shit.

[–]Personal_Ice2327 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I’m not watching it if she’s in it

[–]FlatTire2005 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I hope she’s cut. I really wanna see the movie, but I can’t if she’s in it. I plan on never watching any movie with her in it unless it’s porn (with her being submissive, of course).

[–]Space_Exploring7_6 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If they do, I will watch it... Else they can shove it...

[–]G0DatWork 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Can we just save everyone and delete all the with heard AND all the scenes without her...

[–]MaddestChadLad 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I seperate art from the artist. I wanna see both versions

[+]Young_Ayy -6 points-5 points-4 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I mean she def deserves it and I'm on Johnny's side, but Hollywood is cringe af for pulling moves like this lmfao. And not only Hollywood, literally all groups of people who do this stuff make me sick to the stomach.

[–]carlbandit 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If you was half way through shooting a film with Hitler as the lead but then found out about the concentration camps, you'd look to remove him from the footage. I'm not saying domestic abuse is as bad as the holocaust, but it's still generally pretty unpopular with the general public.

[–]Young_Ayy -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If it's already filmed and it just so happened that Hitler played his character really well I wouldn't bother. But then again I'm naive to think that they did it to be "just". They probably figured they'd lose more viewers by not removing her.

[+]Edukovic -13 points-12 points-11 points 4 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

I'm gonna be completely honest here, I think canceling her is exactly what we complain about women doing to men. I don't agree with her being taken out of the movie.

I loved the trial result, I hope it's a beacon of hope for changes in the world we live in, but, I don't agree with her being canceled. It's tempeting, I almost celebrate that, but I don't agree with it.

[–]UnlikelyPotato 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Different is often with men, it happens without a trial, jury, etc. The presumption is guilt. Where's she's been found to have slandered his name by a trial of peers who reviewed all the evidence. Big big difference. And this I'm okay with.

[–]Edukovic -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I agree it's different. I celebrate the trial's result. But I can't say I agree to end her career. I mean, even if its highly unlikely, people can change for the better and she is already paying the fine from the trial.

To completely cancel her is to deny that chance of improvement. And I know there are women that deny that chance for men foe much less, but one mistake does not allow another.

Just my 2 cents.

[–]thejynxed 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This is not her first domestic abuse and l'm A Lying Asshole rodeo. She beat the fuck out of at least one previous (female) partner that came forward about it. Press X to Doubt on her changing her stripes.

[–]Edukovic -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, I totally agree with you. It's kinda mixed feelings for me, I'm just all against canceling.

[–]Ciliate -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

But......why? Actress has done goofed it. We get it. What's the point of removing this character from a movie when the scenes are already finished?

[–]lillweez99 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Same could be said for Johnny's lost roles, quit trying to make it one sided when her own actions of lying and defaming him for her lie, karma is a real bitch.

[–]buzzmandt 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

millions probably won't watch it.

Millions more won't watch it if she is kept in it. Nothing but a bottom line decision at the end of the day

[–]Maskguy 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I will not watch the movie with her in it.

[–]Holiday-CatExpress -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

YES QUEEN, BURN THAT OUTRAGE FUEL!!!

[+]ZedEssex -23 points-22 points-21 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Didn't see the first one, probably was never going to see the second one either. HOWEVER, I don't think it's fair to punish all the people that worked on Aquaman 2 just for working on or being in a film with someone you don't like. They didn't do anything wrong and they've likely worked very hard to try and entertain you. The other thing is what do you mean by "I won't see it". Do you mean you won't see in a theater but you'll watch it on a streaming service at some point? Do you mean you won't watch it "legally"? Before you start to think I'm "Team Amber", let me make my point. AH has already probably made it so you won't see JD as Jack Sparrow ever again, she's taken that from you. You didn't get to see JD reprise his role as Grindelwald, she took THAT from you as well. If you're a Jason Momoa fan, an Aquaman fan or just someone who would enjoy AQ2 why would you let her take this from you as well?

[–]Cody2533 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

The actors have already been paid. Refusing to watch it won’t hurt them. It will hurt the executives that refused to recast AH.

[–]SerialSection 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

A movie bombing has a huge effect on the actors careers.

[–]Cody2533 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If the movie or acting is bad yes. If it bombs because the people in charge of the movie took the side of a narcissist and abuser it won’t. It may kill the third movie they were planning on doing, but that would be stupid if they did that.

[–]The-Old-Ghost 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Not entirely true. If the movie flops, it will hurt the actors in that other studios will see them as less "bankable", and thus, they will pass them over for someone else. So refusing to see the movie to spite the studio for not removing AH, is all well and good, but you're also saying that the other actors aren't enough of a draw, and in the future, they will have a bit more of a hill to climb to get future parts.

[–]Grammar-Notsee_ 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not entirely true. If the movie flops, it will hurt the actors in that other studios will see them as less "bankable"

That's usually true, but I think the term 'extenuating circumstances' may apply with this one film.

[–]SkepticalAdventurer 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Love to hear it. When r they gonna get around to cutting the rest of the movie too tho?

[–]BennyNutts 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think movies and her can make alot of money just every time she's in a movie she gets killed in a bizarre way with writers just finding more elaborate ways for her to die

[–]che85mor 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She'll still get paid

[–]SystemAllianceN7 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She’s pretty hot but she’s a bad girl.

[–]ThePigmanAgain 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It would be a sign of progress, but seems extremely unlikely. Soggy knees and shit.

[–]kudiyanlivesmatter 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

hell yeah

[–]Snake_Plissken224 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They've been saying "rumored" forever now, I'll believe it when it happens

[–]ozzmosis 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It must be true, it's on reddit......

[–]tigole 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wouldn't that make Bruce Wayne's vision at the end of ZSJL kind of weird?

[–]NAHEWBEE 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Replace her scenes with a cross dressed JD and you have meme level 349.6

[–]GyaradosDance 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nicole Kidman, we need you on set!

[–]lester_pe 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

sucks for warner bros i was gonna torrent it anyway. i'll just close my eyes when shes up lol

[–]daeronryuujin 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Been hearing this rumor daily since before the trial ended. Still calling BS.

[–]Samurai_1990 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There is no way they can release this w/ her in it. It will be a flop and the end (possibly) of the Aquaman franchise or serious damage.

[–]blank0007 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Good

[–]robshum 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

IF im watching aquaman 2, I'm certainly not paying for it.

[–]chiveez 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Remove Amber Heard from Aquaman 2 movie. Please!! I will not go see it if she is not removed. Thank you

[–]02201970a 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Cgi a shark eating her and dying of food poisoning.

[–]clown_shoe_gangbang -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just leave them there, geez. Not a fan of this cancel culture the NPCs approve of.

[+]The__Relentless -8 points-7 points-6 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I believe what Amber Heard did was wrong. However, I don't think deleting her from the movie is a good idea. It perpetuates a bad precedent. Just skip through her parts.

[–]playerman7 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well they do want to make money. That 4.5M, assuming theyre all real, is a massive loss in revenue if they dont watch it because of her presence.

Honestly i think people should just avoid the online war going on and just vote with their wallet. Don't watch any media or consume anything endorsed by people you dont like.

[–]PrioryOfSion14 -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

This is not a rumor anymore. I think it's already official. It was announced by a disney executive via social media.

[–]Mythun4523 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Disney isn't making Aquaman tho

[–]PrioryOfSion14 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ow! I meant WB

[–]BingADingDonger -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

STOP SPREADING RUMOURS !!!

[–]Overlord1317 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If this hurts the final product it is really fucking dumb.

[–]demigodxl 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not really because even in the first movie she wasn’t really in it, they knew she was hot garbage. Hell even the producer said she didn’t have any connection to momoa… she got those dead Seth Rogan eyes

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter