Sorry for grammer/spelling mistake And your language is bad. I think with my non-gendered language and when i want to translate, it makes problem

Women there rationalize their hate of porn. The idea of their partner finding pornstars (face and body) attractive, or their partners following pornstars and getting of to pornstars or hentai disturbs these women. Just like many men find the idea of another cock in there partners disgusting. Subjective emotions doeasnt need statistics.

Like Deciding between monogamy and polygamy, you dont need statistics (of course you can use) for disliking them. Ideas are as important fo people as bodies.So idea of sexual exclusivity can be as important as partner's body and face. And it is legimite. People shouldnt shame others because of wanting this idea (if others are not hypocritic).

Justifying porn consumption and... like: "no baby it doesnt replace you" "i dont love them, it is just sex" "it doesnt interfere with our relationship" are just justification, but existing reality harasses the idea of sexual exclusivity. People want to be different. Harassing sexual exclusivity damages this idea. If you remove the idea of sexual exclusivity What remains is some kind of freindship, which is not goal for many men and women. Concepts of friendzone, beta, ... comes from here.

Many People doesnt want friendship (in the name of marriage) for common goals like protecting children. They want to achieve and posses and monopoly another human by his/her consent. (So compulsary love is not fulfilling) Real world is tragedic. People makes mistakes. They think they have found love, but reality discourage them. It reveals That appalling, loving man was just a trash. So people break up with hate, and regret that toxic relationship. But mistakes are forgivable, they were not volounterily. They happend in the search of true love. That is different from a person who actively decided to ABONDON THE IDEA OF SEXUAL EXCLUSIVITY. that is not not a mistake. here, The idea of sexual exclusivity is damaged willingly. So Men and Women who give high importance to this idea, have the right to know if there partner watch porn privately or has a promicous n count. Justifications, cant save the idea. ""HE WANT WITH YOU WHEN HE DAMAGED SEXUAL EXCLUSIVITY"" yes, he was not with me, or i was slept, or at that time each of us was in different city; but he didnt even try to act in this valuable manner (at least valuable for me. I have the right to have values)

Women in r/loveafterporn tells about porn effect on their sex lives. It is the same with n count. Women dont want to be compared, men also. Both say "no baby, now i'm with you, not other people. It means i choose you". This choose is maybe because they couldnt be with other people, they got rejected, they get pumped and dumped, there was abuse, their ideal is a pornstar, etc. or maybe beacause other people aren't as good in providing/caring so they choose current partner because of these reasons, but having the caring wife doesnt mean they forget the sexy pornstar. Or searching for caring husband doesnt mean they foerget sleeping around with tens... Here we reach to the origin of anger between redpill men and loveafterporn women You can have different value, you can be polyamourus , but why you shame people with their hard monogamy?

Worst part is lie. If i lie about my n count, he wont get hurt and everything will be ok. It is the same mindset "if i watch porn and she doesnt understand, nothing will change. Marriage will work, she will be happy" "if i cheat this time, if i have sex with another women and my wife doesnt understand, nothing will change. She will remain happy, i will have former amount of sex with here." If you dont practice sexual exclusivity, let your partner know. Let him/her decide if she/he want your condition or not. And dont shame him/her for having preference. "I wasnt with her/him at the time so this is none of her/him buisness" is same with " she is not home so it is none of her buisness if i watch porn or bring escort". Boundries in relationship should be determined mutually with expilicit consent of each party

Last defense of sexual exclusivity: It is important to some people, because they dont want to be loved as their mom or dad loved them. This kind of love is fulfilling in many ways, but they prefer to be the object of their partner desire, otherwise they may feel like a MOM FOR PORN ADDICT SON INSTEAD OF WIFE FOR A HUSBAND. OR A PROVIDER FOR A WOMEN AFTER HER CAROUSAL IN HER YOUTH. PROVIDER WITH BENEFIT OR MOM WITH BENEFIT

You see? All of anti-porn women and mgtow men come from this (legimit) point of view And condemnation of oagling men, etc Hope i could transfer my objections