TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Because of #MeToo the number of male managers uncomfortable mentoring women has more than tripled. Almost half are uncomfortable participating in a common work activity with a woman.

ragingfartalot

February 15, 2018
2559 upvotes
/r/PussyPassDenied
https://leanin.org/sexual-harassment-backlash-survey-results/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Because of #MeToo the number of male managers uncomfortable mentoring women has more than tripled. Almost half are uncomfortable participating in a common work activity with a woman.
Author

ragingfartalot

Upvotes 2559
Comments 275
Date February 15, 2018 11:34 AM UTC
(8 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/PussyPassDenied
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/pussypassdenied/comments/7xpse8/because_of_metoo_the_number_of_male_managers/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/PussyPassDenied/because-of-metoo-the-number-of-male-managers.905913
https://theredarchive.com/post/905913
Top posts by ragingfartalot

UK Judge calls for overhaul of marriage law that men must pay their ex-wives for life

5442 upvotes
March 22, 2018
/r/PussyPassDenied

Female jail worker illegally has sex with inmate in prison. Says the inmate was a sociopath and that she lacked "training to supervise problematic inmates." She was married at the time with kids, and was sentenced to more than 4 years for over 28 counts.

1906 upvotes
February 24, 2018
/r/PussyPassDenied

“Women do not have the right to take up space everywhere, just because they are women," a woman says after turning away female customer from barbershop.

1758 upvotes
March 7, 2018
/r/PussyPassDenied

"Contemporary feminists portray women as victims, when in fact most of us feel more empowered than ever... women aren’t charity cases. We don’t need Sarah Jessica Parker to save us. The message working-class women are sending to feminists is clear: back off."

1543 upvotes
April 6, 2018
/r/PussyPassDenied

America is waking up to the farce that is feminism

1349 upvotes
April 13, 2018
/r/PussyPassDenied

Feminist SJWs attend a talk and get offended by a comment that "men are on average taller than women." They walk out, and try to create a disturbance, before being removed by much taller man.

908 upvotes
March 2, 2018
/r/PussyPassDenied

Woman initiates divorce. Her ex-husband later dates someone younger, hotter, and more ambitious. She says: "I am suddenly struggling with extreme jealousy and hate of her... I remembered why I fell in love with this man and now can't help but think that he could still be mine..."

646 upvotes
April 22, 2018
/r/PussyPassDenied

"Opening doors for women is a symbol of aggressive patriarchy."

389 upvotes
April 19, 2018
/r/PussyPassDenied

Comments

[–]ibelieveinigloos1 points 8 years ago [recovered] (12 children) | Copy Link

I’ve coached high school girls basketball and been very successful for almost a decade (7 district titles and 3 state in 9 years). At the end of this year, I cannot in good conscious continue to do so for fear of allegations that while most definitely would be false, could prove damning to myself professionally and to my family. It’s heartbreaking, because I won’t be coaching my daughter as she gets into high school. But I cannot and will not make myself a target for some teenage girl or a woman that wants to advance her own agenda. I’ve always had female assistants due to not wanting to be in a situation that could be suspect, but now I don’t even trust my colleagues to do and say what’s right.

[–]KaribouLouDied 134 points135 points136 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It sucks but you’re making the right choice. The whole shoot first and ask questions later in regards to supposed sexual assault against a woman (not a male, mind you, it has to be proven until the media/public shames them) is not worth the risk.

[–]Rationalbacon 58 points59 points60 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

the more you coach the greater the probability it will happen

[–]SarahC 40 points41 points42 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[RagingBitch 8:30am Tueday]
I was picking up the balls after lessons. I looked over and saw Sir, I mean ibeleiveinigloos, licking his lips while checking my butt out!
He's a dirty paedophile! #MeToo

[comment] [share] [+145 (like)]

(Nothing in the newspaper ever showed up about her being pissed about being told to spit her gum out during practice, and wanting to get back at him. A short time later he loses his job, his friends, his wife divorces him, and he gets put on the offenders register)

[–]MDADJD 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Wait what, most?

[+]CaughtInTheNet1 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (6 children) | Copy Link

"for fear of allegations that while MOST definitely would be false, could prove damning to myself professionally and to my family"

What have you been up to?

[–]Banequo 28 points29 points30 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You are the reason why he’s not gonna coach.

[+]Miggle-B -8 points-7 points-6 points 8 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Why use the word most though? Edit: wow I'm dense

[–]dienamight 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

To put emphasis on it? Allegations that would MOST DEFINITELY be false. Makes a ton of sense

[–]dienamight 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hear ye hear ye man accused of sexual assault after using the word most to emphasise the word definitely. In what dumbass way do you speak English where most definitely doesn't mean 100%. If i say I'm MOST DEFINITELY not gonna do that that means there's no chance I'm gonna do it. You're making yourself look dumb

[–]Spoopsnloops 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

My immediate thought after reading his post was that when he doesn't coach anymore people would look at him accusingly as if he had lecherous intentions all along. Kind of like a case of damned if you do and damned if you don't.

Good work on substantiating my thought on that here. Makes me feel doubly sad for the guy, and men in general.

[–]TheMeisterAce 949 points950 points951 points 8 years ago (125 children) | Copy Link

It goes beyond that. Hiring females is dropping. You phone interview to keep up appearances and then hire the most qualified male. This movement is going to backfire.

[–][deleted] 557 points558 points559 points 8 years ago (104 children) | Copy Link

Well it was bound to happen. While there are undoubtedly plenty of real harassment cases which are deplorable and should be dealt with properly, there is also giving rise to this bullshit risk that males face in the workplace where if a woman complains, he is automatically fired and publicly shamed. So the alternative is to avoid females in the work place. #metooamwithoutajob

[–][deleted] 436 points437 points438 points 8 years ago (101 children) | Copy Link

Hiring women is a liability now. They tend to complain about trivial shit more often and in my experience generally just cause more problems. Not all of them, but enough. Every criticism has a "it's because I'm a woman, isn't it?" right around the corner. Fuck sexual harassment, be concerned about inexplicable claims of gender bias and gender discrimination. If you promote a guy she doesn't like over her, be prepared for anything from her starting rumors to a fucking lawsuit.

The problem is more and more women enter into workplaces assuming they're sexist. They've been raised on this shit so they're hyper-sensitive to it. Not saying every woman does this, but there's enough of them with the Sexism Scales in their head ready to weigh every single fucking thing they don't agree with. And it does not change the more senior position they have, I can fucking tell you that. You can be the CEO of a company and if a subordinate questions your competence for a second, it's a toxic misogynist environment and everything needs to change and men need to do better.

[–]NotTodayBoogeyman 257 points258 points259 points 8 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

This is everything I’ve experienced in 3 jobs over 8 years. In all my workplaces women have caused problems, stir up TONS of unnecessary drama, can’t separate business/personal and the most hypocritical one is the sexual harassment. Most of the women I’ve worked with have sexually harassed male employees and they would swear they never did. It’s so ass backwards it hurts.

I confronted the girl who sexually harassed me at my last job and she had her dad show up and try to beat me up. I told him to calm down, explained what his daughter did to me, and the guy left realizing his daughter is a lying hoe. If roles were reversed I probably would have been on the news for that story as a strong woman standing up to her offender, but Nah I’m a Dude so most people will just assume I’m lying or gloating about girls wanting me

At my current job there’s a woman everyone loves, my first day she introduced herself to me by sitting on my lap..... what? She crosses boundaries REGULARLY and nobody bats an eye because she’s just being her playful self lol fuck double standards

[–]Smacky_Da_FrogIm owed back jack wages bitch 74 points75 points76 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Geez, this is triggering me, lol! Last weekend I was at a bar for Karaoke Night and some middle-aged woman decided she liked my eyes or some shit and kept bugging me. After my friend arrived, at one point we were sitting there talking, she sits on my other side, and puts her arms around my head. I try to be chill as possible in bars, so I just sort of shook her off and said "no no no." Luckily she seemed a little miffed that I did that and finally left me alone until she left a bit later. And yeah, I sang great!

[–]a_bingo_goose 19 points20 points21 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

What did you sing. These are the details we need.

[–]Smacky_Da_FrogIm owed back jack wages bitch 24 points25 points26 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

First, "You've Got That Loving Feeling" by the Righteous Brothers, then "A Long December" by Counting Crows (the ladies love that one), "Jeanie (867-5309)" by Tommy Tutone, "I Am I Said" by Neil Diamond, "Clint Eastwood" by Gorillaz, "Rocky Racoon" by the Beatles, and "Dani California" by the Red Hot Chili Peppers.

[–]polo4sport 14 points15 points16 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Uhhh 👌🏾 Great list with a solid finisher

[–]Smacky_Da_FrogIm owed back jack wages bitch 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thanks, sometimes song selection can be difficult. Knowing I can sing maybe 5-8 songs during the evening, depending on the size of the rotation, means I have to pick and choose from the hundreds of songs that I love. I tend to favor oldies, but I like to put in some more recent stuff too, for the audience's sake. I think I need to listen to more current pop though, I realized recently that I don't know the phrasing or melodies for any Sunfly songs more recent than 2010.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Isn't it lost that loving feeling ?

[–]Smacky_Da_FrogIm owed back jack wages bitch 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why yes it is! I just looked it up. Lucky for me they provide a lyrics prompter with Karaoke, because I'd be screwing the words up all the time. Especially the Beatles!

[–][deleted] 69 points70 points71 points 8 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, and I don't think there ought to be a law against women working or we ought to veer the culture in such a way as to prohibit them. But for me, if I am starting a business - which I have done before - I at the very least hesitate to hire or work with women in close proximity.

And you know what, my girlfriend has worked in offices that are either 90% or 100% women and many of the management are feminist types who can't shut up about how amazing and freeing it is to not have to work with me. They love it and boast about only hiring women. Okay, fine. That's your right. You should be able to do that. Just let everyone else do the same.

[–]TheLonelySnail 42 points43 points44 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

My sister works for a in home care company, in their business office. I've been trying to find a new gig and asked if they were hiring people and was told 'Oh we don't hire men in the office, that way we can be ourselves'.

By my sister! And its like 1 - ummm - illegal and 2 - This is the same woman who tells me weekly about 'teh dramaz' at work. Maybe hire some worker bee males and the drama will drop?

[–]NotTodayBoogeyman 18 points19 points20 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol for real the answer is right in front of them and they cannot see it because they’re blinded by this self righteousness for being strong females like what?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I just gotta ask, how exactly that business continues to exist if they openly state they only hire women? Are there laws that allow this that I'm not aware of? Can you not sue them? Cuz that is crazy if they can just ignore the law to that extent because "muh women power"

[–]TheLonelySnail 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well it’s not ‘company policy’ set in the rules, it’s just what they actually do. And it’s not the whole company, just the office people who do payroll and HR etc.

Gotta have someone to take out the garbage, right?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ooooh OK that makes a lot more sense

[–]fahque650 66 points67 points68 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

And you know what, my girlfriend has worked in offices that are either 90% or 100% women and many of the management are feminist types who can't shut up about how amazing and freeing it is to not have to work with me. They love it and boast about only hiring women. Okay, fine. That's your right. You should be able to do that. Just let everyone else do the same.

Anyone that has experience in these types of organizations knows they are 100x more toxic. I don't think there is a single example of a really successfull company run by women.

My S.O has vowed she will never work for a women again.

[–]Corvus489 29 points30 points31 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Like this women only production company that collapsed due to infighting.

[–]rg90184 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

unenthused voice

Oh no, who could have seen that coming.

[–]Nano0k 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As someone with 20 years in production, the only time I've been yelled at at work was by a woman.

[–]asaasa19831 points 8 years ago [recovered] (77 children) | Copy Link

Women have always been a liability if you ask me. Sure this is more widespread and they are more of a liability now but 20 years ago I was already hearing of places where women where using laws to sue their employer for shit THEY did. Oh yeah I got pregnant, took 3 years off and now you won't promote me versus the man who worked all those three years? Here comes motherfucking fair employment department (governmental organisation) to ''look at your work ethic and fair practices''.

There was a lawsuit about a huge government department not having equal wages for their male and female employees. The only thing they proved is that in average women earned less than men. By their own ''survey'', the average years women had worked was lower than men... yet they won in court because FUCK LOGIC! I had a family member that was in that lawsuit and I knew from her own admittance that there was no sexism and they had no argument to stand on. For years she was ''not expecting much because there isn't much to the lawsuit'' but they still won hundreds of millions... go figure what the heck was going trough that judge mind. Even after the fact, the media couldn't find a single instance of someone being unfairly treated for being a woman. Those jobs have paybooks for the jobs, they are publicly posted on internet and available in print for a small fee. But something something, they now have to consider the years those women ''missed work due to child birth''. So yeah you took 24 months off for having a child? Doesn't matter, when you come back they must give you three steps higher salary and your 4 weeks of vacation (2 weeks * 2 years) or more if you where at 3 or 4 weeks per year.

Everywhere I look there is a bunch of women getting into lawsuits about ''unfair treatment''. Wehre are the pursuits from men about not giving them more for harder physical work or for forcing them to work overtime (often not paid for the full overtime they did) ? Where is the lawsuits for giving them positions with higher mortality rates?

The problem is we allow women to come into a workplace and just trash the damn place. I saw sexism from both sides when I worked at different places. It was rampant but let's not pretend it was a one way street. In fact, men where sexist towards women to one another but women had no need to be so discreet, they would make really mean jokes out loud because there is basically no repercusions. If a man dare say a word it'll be met with ''grow up and stop being a little cry baby about it''.

[+]wsgwsg -150 points-149 points-148 points 8 years ago (76 children) | Copy Link

It's always entertaining to see how quickly this sub devolves into embarassing female hate.

[–][deleted] 40 points41 points42 points 8 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

Saying this is female hate is like telling women "don't leave your drink unattended" is male hate. We're just running a risk assessment here and are deciding to err on the side of caution.

[+]wsgwsg -13 points-12 points-11 points 8 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

No Im saying that its about 3 steps away from it. Most of the posts are relatively decent, and the comments degenerate pretty exponentially as the response tree lengthens. Although this post in specific I find hilariously pathetic and a sin of clear misunderstanding and/or purposeful ignorance of the results of the movement.

[–][deleted] 39 points40 points41 points 8 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

What movement? This is essentially the male #MeToo flipside where people are not only describing the shit they've had to deal with in regards to women, but also going one step further (something women really don't do often) and are finding an immediate and actionable solution to deal with it.

See when women complain about men they still put the power in the hands of men and demand them to be the agents of change. "Be better, treat me differently, stop doing these things." It's always women using power by having men do things for them, a they often do through other domains of life.

Men on the other hand aren't demanding anything of women right now. We're saying "we can fix this right now by doing our own thing over here and reducing risk." Once again, men are the agents of change, on their own accord. And still women complain about that, they don't want to be left to do shit on their own, they demand to be involved with men and exert that control. Women altogether suck at doing that so I think you're probably going to struggle with that and think it's too "mean" or whatever the fuck.

[–]ragingfartalot[S] 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Incredibly perceptive and well put.

[+]wsgwsg -9 points-8 points-7 points 8 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Except this is men saying "I'm scared that someone will accuse me of rape," obviously with the caveat that they didnt actually rape or sexually assault/etc. the person.

Women in the MeToo movement are not speaking out in fear of a potential upcoming accusation from no one in specific, it's calling out a specific person who has already done something to you. These are incredibly different in magnitude and Im not sure what to say if you think those are equivalent. One is fear of a potential (and statistically unlikely event). The other is speaking out about an already past event.

I think women should be smart. I think if you're out alone a woman should carry some items for self defense. I dont think that can be overstated, but to say "The people who are persecuting me and the people defending the people persecuting me need to be better" is not some widespread way to pass the buck, as you argue. It's laying blame on of an event, and telling the assailant/defenders of assailants to improve their behavior.

Men aren't fixing anything by this because there is no problem. The false rape claims compared to substantiated rape claims are a trivial statistic. They are acting out in fear of a danger which doesnt exist, which is ironic, since women face sexual harassment exceedingly often.

[–]ragingfartalot[S] 25 points26 points27 points 8 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

I think MeToo began as a genuine good-faith movement (and particularly in Hollywood it's not hard to imagine there being some toxic and unprofessional work situations), however it is has since been hijacked by a few bad actors and turned into a witchhunt.

A quote often credited to Voltaire: "To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."

The writing was on the wall as soon as Google fired that employee for the thought-crime of expressing his opinions on gender in a memo.

[–]PM_ME_UR_SMILE_GURL 69 points70 points71 points 8 years ago (54 children) | Copy Link

Have any counters for his claims?

[+]wsgwsg -91 points-90 points-89 points 8 years ago (53 children) | Copy Link

His first point about pregnancy is totally based on nothing. Ive never seen a female coworker come off maternity leave of three years, or anything even close to that (US alots 12 weeks/yr), and then demand a raise. If you have data that reflects this feel free to share it.

The pay gap is complicated, and while intra-industry comparisons do not reflect the pay gap there is reason to believe that it is society that pushes women to pursue lower paying jobs. Areas in which women are exposed to science in a more positive, sex-neutral environment, they pursue science more, and as such, pursue higher paying jobs. Perhaps you develop opinions about the people you surround yourself with, and you're surrounding yourself with experiences of specifically bitchy women and generalizing this to the whole? The only issues in the pay gap that I see from the women I talk to/interact with is on the issue of society endearing worse jobs to women, causing the pay gap.

And he finishes off with whataboutism that's again entirely based on his personal experience. Ive seen magnitudes more sexism towards women than towards men in the workplace or otherwise. Can I now use this as proof, too?

Im a man, and I have a job where I interact with women on a daily basis. I have no and have never had the slightest fear that I would be falsely accused of anything. The rate at which false accusations occur in comparison to valid accusations is trivial. And I dont behave in a manner to make any such accusations valid.

[–]ragingfartalot[S] 40 points41 points42 points 8 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

I have no and have never had the slightest fear that I would be falsely accused of anything. The rate at which false accusations occur in comparison to valid accusations is trivial.

You're entitled to feel that way, but the statistics I've read currently peg the false accusation rate at around 2 to 10% of all sexual assault accusations. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_accusation_of_rape

It's very difficult to determine precisely how many accusations are false, and in the absence of such data, it's very rational for men to be concerned about false accusations and removing themselves from potentially compromising work situations - a response that is predictable as it is unintended to the MeToo movement.

You can dismiss "anecdotal instances" all you like, but it's difficult to ignore the sheer number of examples such as the following (non-exhaustive list):

1. Canadian Woman fabricates racist death threats against man who loses his job:

Amjad first made headlines when she reported being the victim of racist threats ahead of the election. In an interview with CBC News, Amjad changed her story numerous times. She initially denied ever meeting or knowing Shawn Street, but by the end of an hour-long conversation she confirmed she'd met Street online and had gone on several dates with him.

EDIT LINK: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/nimra-amjat-racist-death-threats-school-trustee-charges-police-1.4510339

The falsely accused man Shawn Street lost his job:

What doesn't make sense is; if Shawn Street was brazen enough to use his own name and photo, why would he start a second account to make the threats? Street says he was "mortified" when he first learned his name was connected to the hateful, potentially criminal online posts. He went to Calgary police right away. "I told them everything, I told them right from the beginning how we met; dinner, lunches, everything," said Street.

EDIT LINK: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/nimra-amjat-racist-death-threats-shawn-street-police-not-investigating-1.4355351

2. Radio host loses job after accidentally touching a woman's bare back despite immediately apologizing

“I put my hand on a woman’s bare back,” he told the Star Tribune in an email. “I meant to pat her back after she told me about her unhappiness and her shirt was open and my hand went up it about six inches. She recoiled. I apologized. I sent her an email of apology later and she replied that she had forgiven me and not to think about it. We were friends. We continued to be friendly right up until her lawyer called.”

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/nov/29/garrison-keillor-fired-minnesota-public-radio-allegations-improper-behavior

3. Duke Lacrosse Case: Students on a lacrosse team were suspended and coach forced to resign in the face of sexual assault allegations that were later determined to be false

In response to the allegations, Duke University suspended the lacrosse team for two games on March 28, 2006... Duke president Richard Brodhead canceled the remainder of the 2006 season... Mike Pressler, the coach of the lacrosse team, received threatening e-mails and hate calls, had castigating signs placed on his property, and was the frequent victim of vandalism in the aftermath of the accusations.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_lacrosse_case#Aftermath

4. UVA Discredited Rape Story

The article, “A Rape on Campus,” was retracted in April 2015 after a Columbia Journalism School report that said the magazine failed to take basic journalistic steps to verify the account of a woman, identified only as Jackie, who said she was the victim of a gang rape. It was an embarrassing episode for a magazine that has long prided itself on its journalistic accomplishments.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/13/business/media/rape-uva-rolling-stone-frat.html

5. Woman falsely accuses 15 men of rape.

“Beale is responsible for fabricating a series of extremely serious allegations, which led to several extensive investigations being carried out and teams of detectives and specialist officers spending thousands of hours on the cases and providing support to her,” Detective Sgt. Kevin Lynott said in a statement. “Her manipulation of the criminal justice system has caused police to direct significant amounts of resource into investigating her bogus complaints as well as her own offending,” he added.

https://nypost.com/2017/08/25/woman-heading-to-prison-after-falsely-accusing-15-men-of-rape/

The irony here is, as men who decline to become mentors for women, they're acting rationally and taking steps to protect themselves.

Look at the shitstorms that regularly ensue whenever you suggest a woman take precautions to protect themselves from rape - you'll be bombarded with accusations of misogyny and saying "stop victim-blaming" and "how about teaching men not to rape?"

But here, men are only acting in defensively by removing themselves from potentially compromising situations. And yet they're still getting disapproval from people such as yourself.

In the currently climate, no good deed goes unpunished, and I will absolutely decline to mentor women in the workplace or put myself in potentially compromising situations. You do you.

[+]wsgwsg -30 points-29 points-28 points 8 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

You listed 5 cases lmao. You could list 100 cases and it wouldn't matter, do you know how many rapes occur a day? An hour? And I've actually had INCREDIBLY civil discussion on how in cases of physical violence rape, that women can and should prepare themselves. Because of how terrible and awful the sexual harassment climate is for women. That doesn't discount the fact that we do need to better our culture to reduce these occurances. Defense against rape doesn't reduce the number of rapists. And lots of rape is via drugging, or pressure/social circumstance "she wouldn't say no cause of the implication" etc.

I don't have a problem with men taking precautions to keep themselves safe, but when the action is so large that the result is men thinking that they have become the primary victim is laughable. Its like MRAs. I have total respect for bringing light to male sexual abuse, male suicide rates etc. But any implication that men because of these issues have it worse than women is hilarious to me. The fact that you are going to quite literally isolate yourself from women as much as possible tells me more about your victim complex than anything.

[–]ragingfartalot[S] 42 points43 points44 points 8 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Yes, I specifically indicated that:

  1. It was a non-exhaustive list,
  2. It's difficult to determine how many accusations are false, but that
  3. According to studies I've read, as many as 10% of all accusations could be false.

Are you okay with one in 10 people losing their jobs/educational opportunites on the basis of an accusation alone without due process? All it takes is interacting with one crazy person to ruin your career.

As I said, you do you, but men who decline to mentor women in the workplace or decline to put themselves in compromising situations are acting rationally and in their own self interest.

The fact that you are going to quite literally isolate yourself from women as much as possible tells me more about your victim complex than anything.

Interesting. Do you say the same thing about women who demand trigger warnings, safe spaces, and women only spaces?

The fact that the number of people who agree with me have tripled is perhaps cause for concern.

EDIT: I've never said men are primary victim in all this, and that's blatant strawmanning. I'm simply pointing out an unintended consequence of the few bad actors that have hijacked the MeToo movement and produced an even wider gulf between men and women.

[–]DWSage007 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Imagine it this way. You have a bowl of M&Ms, and one in twenty are poisonous...

[–]SableLungs 62 points63 points64 points 8 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

You ever consider that you have a unique experience and so does he? This whole thread is full of anecdotes and yours are the least impressive, live with it.

[+]wsgwsg -58 points-57 points-56 points 8 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

Thats my point. Random people who self-select themselves to join a community based around what ends up being 3 steps away from woman-hating (Not that that's the intent of the sub, I used to enjoy this place as an extension of JusticeServed), may have a biased, inaccurate perception of female behavior from their group consensus. It is almost as if anecdotal evidence isn't evidence!

[–]Ntghgthdgdcrtdtrk 31 points32 points33 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

And yet you use anedoctal evidence to push your opinion that the guy is lying for the sake of hating women.

Have you already considered the possibility that men and women are different?

[–][deleted] 24 points25 points26 points 8 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

As a guy who has been an unwarranted target of this shit from a woman at work. Fuck you, dude. We get it. You’re a perfect specimen and there is no fucking way you would ever be affected by this type of shit. Seriously, fuck off and stay out of these conversations, you pretentious fuck. Some of us are truly affected by this shit so shut the fuck up and stay out of it if you have nothing better to add than “that would never happen to me”.

[–]windowtothesoul 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Yet you're missing the above commenter's point... you're attempting to discredit anecdotal evidence with your own anecdotal evidence.

It is reasonable to say 'based on my experience, doubt this is the norm' but coming across as saying 'based on my experience, this isn't possible'.

Also, if you say the former '...doubt this is the norm' you're really not using any better logic.

[–]asaasa19831 points 8 years ago [recovered] (6 children) | Copy Link

nd he finishes off with whataboutism that's again entirely based on his personal experience. Ive seen magnitudes more sexism towards women than towards men in the workplace or otherwise. Can I now use this as proof, too?

Why would you need to? Because your comment STARTS with your own opinion used as a fact :

Ive never seen a female coworker ...

This is the problem with your comment in a nutshell: you use your experience to validate your point while also using other people experience as ''non-valid argument''.

[+]wsgwsg -6 points-5 points-4 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

My entire point was that anecdotes are not enough to substantiate a claim. Thats why I said "Can I use this as proof, too?" Mine included. You providing anecdotes are garbage. I have anecdotes to counter it. Everyone has an anecdote for every position they have ever held any faith in. If you want a substantial argument, bring actual information. I didnt provide my anecdote to say "mine is proof, but yours isnt" thats garbage logic. Notice again how I said "If you have data that reflects this feel free to share it." It is almost as if I was trying to prove a point :thinking:

[–]asaasa19831 points 8 years ago [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link

Reread YOUR damn comment! It's totally NOT what you're doing.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You are trying to refute his anecdotal evidence with your own anecdotal evidence...

[–]VanishMantle 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So "society" is to blame for women CHOOSING lower paying jobs but not the woman who can CHOOSE to do whatever she wants because muh wimyn rights.

This same woman can CHOOSE to destroy someone by claiming sexual harassment then later say "oops I lied" and nothing happen to her meanwhile the man is ruined for life.

You say you work with women but have you ever stopped to think that the women you talk to may in fact be, wait for it... LYING???? You do know they can do that right?

[–]wsgwsg -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Its more complicated than choice. People who develop stockholm syndrome are "choosing" to like their captor, but we're smart enough to know that this deision is based nearly entirely off of their environment. When you're in a world that shames you for certain interests, and simultaneously giving you your own set of "things you should like" and they almost all happen to be menial and supportive labor, it's no wonder why this happens.

And quite a few women that are being caught with false claims are actually getting jail time, so that's good.

Everyone can lie. Luckily what information we have seems to indicate that only about 1/20 sexual assault claims are suspected to be false.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

society that pushes women to pursue lower paying jobs

I agree with pretty much everything you wrote, except this. Don't you think this mindset infantilizes women? It basically says they have no real agency when it comes to picking a career.

In the Scandinavian countries (widely thought to be leaders in education and workplace gender equality) the majority of nurses are still women and the majority of engineers are still men.

[–]wsgwsg 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Everyone is defined by how they were raised and their environment. You, me, everyone. No man is an island. None of our personalities or characteristics are truly independent. It's not initializing, it's realistic.

And the rates of female involvement in STEM fields is rising in countries that emphasize gender equality. Saying they aren't the same, or even that they will never be the same, are not the concern.

Lets say in a perfect world 20% engineers are women and 80% are men, but in a flawed world that shames women for following STEM interests, the skew is 5:95. They should still be obligated to relieve the undue stresses on the system so that it can reach its 20:80 balance.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

They should still be obligated to relieve the undue stresses on the system so that it can reach its 20:80 balance.

I get that your numbers are simply examples, but how do we identify the "they" you say is responsible for it being 5/95 and not 20/80? And how do we determine what the "correct" proportion is for each occupation? What justifies any scenario that's not close to 50/50?

I agree that anyone should feel empowered to pursue the career they are interested in (excepting BFOQs).

We see the push for gender diversity in specific male-dominated fields, and we also see the pushback when there does not appear to be a similar call for gender diversity in female-dominated fields. I work in HR, where a large majority of the people are women, and never once felt like the school of business where I got my degree in HR encouraged me to go into the field - I also don't think there's anything malicious going on to cause the disparity.

[–]kgriffeyjr22ataol 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The truth hurts huh?

[–]muikes1 12 points13 points14 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

" I just feel like" No Karen we are in work right now, noone cares how you feel!

[–]Its_Me_Dio 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Same can be applied to racism

[–]handklap 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Every criticism has a "it's because I'm a woman, isn't it?"

I have a co-worker who says this all the time. It's her convenient get out of jail free card for any criticism leveled against her no matter how valid.

[–]Byroms 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Honestly I have worked in male dominated jobs before and I can't say I ever thought "Oh he is saying this because I'm a woman". The way I see it, a rough kind of speaking is just part of those kind of fields and I don't mind joining in. It's all part of entry rituals.

[–]TheTyke 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's just being normal.

[–]Ashenox 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This was something a few Feminist professors had pointed out a while ago. If Me too isn't properly policed then it will backfire and harm women in ways the gender will have serious trouble recouping from.

[–]aygomyownroad 71 points72 points73 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It will also mean male managers and bosses may prefer to hire male employees as they will get to know them better as they will feel safer in a more relaxed/just chit chat way and will only talk to females when its just for something to do with work

[–]RainDancingChief 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It was bound to fail the moment they started driving a wedge between men and women.

[–]davisty69 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When people have their careers ruined with no evidence or trial besides the court of public opinion, this is the inevitable conclusion.

[–]subbookkeepper 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Wouldn't a company just hire the largest number of diversity hires they can afford, put them all at one location and segregate them from the rest of the organisation, and then continue on as normal elsewhere?

[–]digitalpizza1 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

It's called a HR department 😏

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I work in HR. At labor conferences I'm usually one of about 10 men for every 60/70 women. HR, as a profession, does not practice what it preaches when it comes to gender diversity.

[–]subbookkeepper 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Segregate them from the rest of the organisation

If only.

[–]Caoimhi 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh my god do I feel bad for the poor fuck who has to run that location.

[–]amlybear 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don’t doubt this at all. I was just having this exact conversation with my supervisor. Why even create the potential to expose yourself to that?? That said, do you have a source or is this anecdotal?

[–]erics75218 12 points13 points14 points 8 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link

It's almost like men and women are different types of human beings. Almost as if they find solutions in different ways and operate in different "theaters" to get the results they desire.

I dated a girl who had a lot of sexual aggression toward her. She was a very above average computer engineer, C++, serious business. She was also from Egypt, and quite good looking. Most of the men at our company had issues with her, not because she was a woman, but because she was incredibly hard to work with.

She wasn't hard to work with because she was a woman, she was hard to work with because she had a MASSIVE ego and was very defensive if you questioned her methods.

She didn't have a bigger ego than other male engineers...all engineers have annoying egos :-). But her ego and defensive nature were born from a lifetime of being a high end engineer as a woman.

All her experience had created a slightly self destructive nature, but she was too good to ever be let go or cause issues. But I was in the same meetings she was sometimes, and I could just see the eyes of all the others in our stand ups....and I know for a fact people said "If she wasn't so good and hot...fired instantly"

She brought a lot of this shit on herself because she felt slighted at most junctions of ideas, weather she was or not. Again this is not because she's a woman, but because she has been treated as one her entire life up to that point in the workplace if that makes sense. "Who is this fucking girl?"

I honestly believe she wanted to just fit in and be listened to, the fact she was arguably the best engineer on the team makes even more sense. Why it didn't happen, I'm sure she felt it had to do with her being a woman. But it had WAY more to do with her attitude. But her attitude was generated because of a lifetime of working in those workplaces....

So I feel like we men, have created some of this hostility toward us in the workplace because of shit that happened before...maybe....I was even f'n BORN! We're paying the price for the f'n Mad Men days

TL:DR I just figured out what I was wanting to say myself. Women aren't born to act like this, it's created by a lifetime of experiences.

[–]onewordmemory1 points 8 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

sexual aggression toward her.

not because she was a woman

what? it was either sexual aggression precisely because she was a woman, or it was regular aggression because she was hard to work with.

She didn't have a bigger ego than other male engineers. But her ego and defensive nature were born from a lifetime of being a high end engineer as a woman.

again, what? if all engineers have egos, then were male engineers' egos born from a lifetime of being engineers as men?

Why it didn't happen, I'm sure she felt it had to do with her being a woman

sounds like it's you who feels like it had to do with her being a woman.

Women aren't born to act like this, it's created by a lifetime of experiences

no one is born to act the way they do, everyone is [at least by large] is a product of their experiences.

your entire tirade can be summed up by "people treated her this way not because shes a woman, but because she's a bitch... but she was a bitch because she's a woman".

[–]erics75218 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

yes, good wrap up.

[–]Hashtag_Nailed_It 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Username absolutely does not check out... that was WAY more than one word

[–]Alabast0rr 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Your story doesn't make sense and is full of plot holes.

[–]erics75218 -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

yeah it sucks, someone else here wrapped it up better than I could.

Basically, she was hard to work with because she was a bitch, not because she was a woman. However she was a bitch because she was a woman. Meaning a lifetime of being a female engineer who was looked upon as a sexual object to have in the office, or an idiot, had kinda molded her into this prototypical bitch.

And maybe that's not a good story either.

[–]timurt421 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just another one of the many ways the previous generations have completely fucked up our world today..

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Egyptian... What is it about people from the Middle East? I used to work with a programmer who was a camelfucker, and he was an angry egotistic douche too. And another Muslim woman too who was really difficult to get along with. They're all such fucks. No wonder their countries are shitholes.

[–]KMKEEPS 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean if you live in Southern California look up the room rental market. The only people who want female roommates are people who want sex.

[–]Drezzzire 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Karma

[–]TylerDurdenUMD 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is exactly what'll happen if mandatory paid maternity leave, especially 1 year, is passed.

[–]kaszak696 56 points57 points58 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

That's what happens when "allegations" became equal to "conviction" int the eyes of public opinion. The boy cried wolf too many times, so he got shot.

The correct solution of course is to replace all male managers with womyn! /s

[–]TheCyanNinja1 points 8 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

So the legitimate guys are less likely to accept a mentoring role with a woman, meaning the guys with ill intent are more likely to get assigned to a mentorship role. Well done.

[–]hfsyou 67 points68 points69 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

4d chess mate

[–]Rationalbacon 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

which then means more accusations and stigma gets generated from male/female work pairing and more decent men will avoid it and rinse and repeat.

[–][deleted] 41 points42 points43 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When I was a CO, I absolutely refused to enter a women’s section without eyes on me from the control tower. I never ever entered a female cell without a female officer present. It’s different than female coworkers, but I can relate to the feeling. It’s a bullshit feeling knowing you can’t do your job properly without fear of a lawsuit or harassment claims...especially when they are made by a criminal.

[–]jabanobotha 343 points344 points345 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

5 years from now when not "enough" women are in powerful positions they will blame sexism, I guarantee it!

[–]PunkAssGhettoBird 93 points94 points95 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Do you live under a rock?

[–]dingus_king_69 45 points46 points47 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No, this is Patrick.

[–]Hashtag_Nailed_It 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Username checks out

[–]The-Devilz-Advocate 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I mean do you live under a rock because it already is happening. Almost every debate about women in the workplace, they throw it out the "there are only 5 women CEOs in the Fortune 500 companies, isn't this because of sexism"/ s

[–]Jakester5112 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No need for /s

[–]ChrisW828 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not this woman. I'm pissed as hell at the members of my gender who can't see that this whole thing is going too far.

[–]van-nostrand-md 262 points263 points264 points 8 years ago (88 children) | Copy Link

And the main reason this movement will hurt women it’s not because men are afraid of being exposed for sexual harassment, but rather that the movement never differentiated between actual sexual harassment/assault and minor situations (e.g., woman was asked out, she declined, and nothing more happened). Since any woman could claim #MeToo without explaining what actually happened but still getting the benefit of sympathy from society, just about every woman claimed #MeToo. People started to realize that the problem was not necessarily pervasive, but that there was no actual definition for what constitutes an assault or harassment.

[–]former_Democrat1 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (6 children) | Copy Link

I didn't claim that me too shit. But I watched other grown women on my Facebook make fools of themselves and cringed the whole time. It seems to me many of them just wanted attention. I've known some of these gals my whole life and had very close friendship with some of them. None ever mentioned the supposed assault until #MeToo. None had any major bumps in the road that indicated a tragedy like that. This is another garbage movement from the "feminist" left that hurts normal women.

[–]emmaisabellaa1 points 8 years ago [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link

'MeToo' became an automatic way to get attention. A girl on my facebook claimed 'MeToo' because someone checked out her bum on the train. MeToo was nothing more than an attention grab.

[–]digitalpizza1 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

It's pretty much become trendy to claim you're a victim.

[–]emmaisabellaa1 points 8 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Which is absolutely disgusting and ruining whatever merit the feminism movement had.

[–]ORIGINAL-Hipster 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I know, ain't it grand?

[–]ragingfartalot[S] 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That is definitely a possible factor. It makes me think of Gad Saad's discussion of Munchausen Syndrome:

Munchausen disorder is when somebody feigns a medical illness or injury to garner sympathy and empathy. Munchausen syndrome by proxy is when you have somebody under your care — say your child — and you harm that third party to garner sympathy. “Look, my child is hurt!” So it’s a really morbid, grotesque psychological desire to draw attention to yourself because you enjoy the sympathy you receive.

I took this psychiatric disorder that I’d written about in a medical journal and then I argued that the manner in which social justice warriors respond is really a manifestation of collective Munchausen. It’s more than just mass hysteria — which is a known psychological mechanism. It has a specific goal which is to turn the attention inward to: “Oh my god, we’re such victims.” So the faux-fear we’re seeing now with all of these, for lack of a better term, schmucks is a form of collective Munchausen. It’s: “Oh my god, we’re going to be gang-raped, the third-reich is coming for us.”

https://areomagazine.com/2017/01/23/gad-saad-on-hysteria-and-collective-munchausen-around-donald-trump-speaking-out-as-an-academic-and-evolutionary-psychology-101/

[–]rg90184 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

e.g., woman was asked out, she declined, and nothing more happened

I remember elevatorgate.

[–]Rationalbacon 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

god i hate that cunt

[–]Ashenox 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe if we all cry wolf something cool will happen?

[+]xn28the-pos -27 points-26 points-25 points 8 years ago (77 children) | Copy Link

Do you consider cat-calling (whistling, "hey baby's", etc) verbal sexual assault?

[–]van-nostrand-md 47 points48 points49 points 8 years ago (76 children) | Copy Link

It's obnoxious, rude, and uncalled for, but I don't consider it verbal sexual assault any more than I consider women making suggestive comments to photos of scantily clad males "textual sexual assault."

[+]xn28the-pos -49 points-48 points-47 points 8 years ago (75 children) | Copy Link

Okay, now imagine that every time it happens, the person on the receiving end fears that their reaction to it (ignoring, smiling, yelling, whatever) could determine whether or not they get followed, robbed, raped, or murdered. Does forcing someone to make that decision change it to verbal assault?

A textual comment, while also obnoxious, isn't in person. Sure, it could lead to a stalker, but that's far less likely.

[–]van-nostrand-md 46 points47 points48 points 8 years ago (68 children) | Copy Link

You asked about verbal sexual assault. There is no such thing. You're making up terms.

Okay, now imagine that every time it happens, the person on the receiving end fears that their reaction to it (ignoring, smiling, yelling, whatever) could determine whether or not they get followed, robbed, raped, or murdered.

People will fear what they fear. Some women fear that wearing a short skirt will get them attacked. Some fear black men. Some fear men driving by on a dark city road. Fear of what might happen doesn't make it sexual assault.

[–]SarahC 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I got a vicious verbal dicking from a guy across the street yesterday.

PoundMeToo

[–]rg90184 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Some guy screamed the word penis in my ear at the top of his lungs, he verbally raped me in the ear hold

PoundMeToo

[+]xn28the-pos -50 points-49 points-48 points 8 years ago (65 children) | Copy Link

They feel that way for a reason. That reason is statistics. Does a group of men have the right to make someone feel in danger for their life?

I already know you're an asshole by your first comment. I'm just wondering how deep it goes.

<you're making up terms.

Google it. Verbal sexual assault and verbal sexual harassment are very real.

[–]Banincoming 34 points35 points36 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You are verbally raping me by me readin that. Also, I have been cat called by women many times as a man.

[–]tmoneSpends too much time with ass cheeks spread apart 29 points30 points31 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

They feel that way for a reason. That reason is statistics

men are the overwhelming majority of violent crime, yet dont have the luxury of cowering and playing the victim all the time. you are responsible for how you feel. if you feel afraid, that's on you.

[+]xn28the-pos -11 points-10 points-9 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Men also commit the vast majority of crime. Fear of men is not irrational.

[–]tmoneSpends too much time with ass cheeks spread apart 19 points20 points21 points 8 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Who the fuck cares what gender the agessor is. Do you think men see other men in dark allies and go, naw, they won't bother me, I'm a man. Get the fuck out. Your sexist opinion is irrelevant.

[+]xn28the-pos -6 points-5 points-4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So, it's relevant that men are usually the victim, but not relevant that men are the aggressor? Sounds about on par for this sub.

[–]van-nostrand-md 26 points27 points28 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm an asshole because I don't agree with your viewpoint. Got it.

That reason is statistics.

Nebulous statement.

Does a group of men have the right to make someone feel in danger for their life?

No one claimed they did.

Do women have the right to assume that everything is sexual assault simply because they feel uncomfortable? Are we to string up a man simply on the word of a woman claiming he did something without providing any proof? Do the women claiming "Me too!" call out the women who turned out to be lying? Because I'm not really seeing it happen. Do you realize women are actually pretty hypocritical when it comes to making lewd comments and objectifying men while at the same time decrying men who objectify women?

[+]xn28the-pos -6 points-5 points-4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm an asshole because I don't agree with your viewpoint. Got it.

No, you're an asshole because you support the scumhole ideologies of this sub.

Does a group of men have the right to make someone feel in danger for their life?

No one claimed they did.

You do by saying its the woman's fault for using logic to assess a situation. Them feeling scared is due to a system that doesn't attempt to correct problematic behavior.

Do women have the right to assume that everything is sexual assault simply because they feel uncomfortable?

They don't, but they have more of a right to claim assault than the cat-caller has to harass them.

Are we to string up a man simply on the word of a woman claiming he did something without providing any proof?

String them up? No, but they should be humiliated for dehumanizing women.

Do the women claiming "Me too!" call out the women who turned out to be lying? Because I'm not really seeing it happen.

You don't seem to see a lot of things, like the high probability of a woman being attacked is at the hands of a man.

Do you realize women are actually pretty hypocritical when it comes to making lewd comments and objectifying men while at the same time decrying men who objectify women?

You learn this belief from this garbage sub. In reality, it happens far less than the objectification of women. Regardless of whether it happens at all, that goes back to my earlier point, that a woman making a comment on social media is not comparable to being harassed on a street.

You're going to do your thing, hating women and blaming them for every bad thing that happens in the world. You'll argue that men and women are biologically different and shouldn't be held to the same standards while simultaneously getting upset when those differences don't favor you. Enjoy that life. I hope your mother is proud.

[–]vuiy1 points 8 years ago [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

No one is responsible for how you react to cat calling, if you honestly fear for your life when it happens you are delusional. No statistics will back up your fear of being murdered because you ignored a rude comment. Why? Because it simply doesn't fucking happen. How do you even make it out your front door in the morning? Christ.

[+]xn28the-pos -6 points-5 points-4 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm a guy. And it does happen.

[–]vuiy1 points 8 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Lightning strikes kill people but I'm not scared for my life every time I hear thunder. You should go play the powerball.

[–]xn28the-pos -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, but if lightning strikes your house, I bet you tense up a bit.

Are you equating the randomness of the lottery to violent crime?

[–]The_Finglonger 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I think you’re getting downvoted because you are conflating “being safe” with “feeling safe”.

What one person considers safe is not universal. And words do not equal actions. If someone says things to you, and it makes you unhappy, that’s not assault.

[–]xn28the-pos -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm getting downvoted because I'm not bashing women. What people are arguing is the equivalent of a sibling waving their hand in front of the others have and saying, "not touching you, can't get mad. Not touching you, can't get mad." Except in this situation, the second person fears the consequences of just ignoring it.

[–]LowRentMegazord 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You just keep telling yourself whatever it takes to never have to examine your position critically for even a moment.

[–]xn28the-pos 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I was actually on the fence with this social movement. Then I started listening to those actually affected by it.

[–]davisty69 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Another verbal concession with ad hominem attacks.

Damn, keeping score here is super easy.

I'll start keeping track and update as I get through more if this thread.

Ad hominem attacks used -

Asshole - 2 Idiot - 1

[–]ragingfartalot[S] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (47 children) | Copy Link

The law focuses on the outward behaviour of the aggressor because a wide range of responses are possible for a victim. Feeling in danger of one's life is a subjective thing, so the law focuses on whether a reasonable person in that situation would feel threatened. Here are defenses to criminal threats:

A person is not guilty of criminal threats where the threat is not immediate, the threat is overly vague or ambiguous, the threat does not make the victim afraid, the threat does not cause reasonable fear or if the threat was not communicated orally, in writing or via electronic communications. In these cases, the defendant would have a valid defense if charged with this offense.

NOTE: Depends on what jurisdiction you're in. This example is from California.

[–]xn28the-pos -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (46 children) | Copy Link

You conveniently glossed over the "does not feel afraid" part. Thanks for making my point for me!

[–]ragingfartalot[S] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (45 children) | Copy Link

By "gloss over" you mean I didn't bold it? Because if the "victim does not feel afraid" then that is a complete defense and anyone charged is absolutely free to go in the state of California. So actually it doesn't make your point at all.

If the victim feels afraid, BUT any of the other conditions are met E.g. not immediate, vague, etc. then there is no crime.

[–]xn28the-pos -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (44 children) | Copy Link

That's not what "or" means. If ANY of those conditions apply, it looks like the defendant is not free and clear.

[–]tallwheel 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

OK so let me get your argument straight.

Because there are men who will follow, rob, rape, or murder women who reject their cat calls, that makes every cat call any man makes a "verbal assault" for which he deserves punishment?

[–]dienamight 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So if a hobo talks to me on the street I get assaulted? I always fear he might rob me, nice to know i'm verbally assaulted every time. No I'm not, my feelings don't matter, women's feelings don't matter either. Facts matter not ooh ooh he made me feel bad. You can't charge people for making other people scared that's a feeling you choose to have and is part of life. I'm scared all the time while walking alone at night and you don't see me suing the city for looking scary, or the hobo for begging and scaring me. Are you crazy.

[–]xn28the-pos 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Panhandling is illegal in most areas. They stop it for a reason. Cops don't always do a good job, but it's illegal, unlike verbal harassment.

[–]ragingfartalot[S] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Firstly, we have to treat those as distinct things. In your example, the crimes being committed are stalking, robbing, raping, or murdering. Those are all crimes.

Cat-calling, whistling, or "hey baby" are all examples of non-criminal speech that does not become criminal just because it preceded the crime. For example, someone could "ask for the time" immediately before committing a crime, but that in itself doesn't mean it's criminal to ask people for the time.

In order to make it criminal there would have be a threat of bodily harm or an uttering of a threat. But I'd argue there's no inherent threat in saying "hey baby" or whistling (in and of itself). There has to be a threat of harm E.g. holding a gun or a knife or other weapon, or raising their fists menacingly as they said it - but in this case the crime isn't the words itself, it's the real threat of harm combined with the means to carry it out.

Secondly, I've been to a gay bar before as a straight man and endured cat-calling, whistling, and hey baby's, but was able to politely decline. Did this gay person verbally sexually assault me? Should I be able to send them to jail for the sin of expressing sexual interest in someone they didn't know wasn't gay, in order to test the waters to see if I was interested? If they cat call and I say I'm not interested, and that's the end of the interaction, then what harm was done?

[–]xn28the-pos -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

non-criminal speech

So, you're arguing that cat-calling is a first amendment right? Because free speech is limited in that it cannot infringe on others rights. A person has the right to not feel harassed, and if they do, the person speaking to them is in the wrong.

People here (not you) are asking if I think people should go to jail for it. No, of course not. But let's look at New York as an example. Horns were being used to much for purposes that were wrong. The unnecessary use of them was creating a hostile, unsafe environment that encouraged road rage and distracted drivers. The city started giving out tickets for the wrongful use of horns. You know what happened? People stopped doing it, to a great degree. Sure, it still happens, but it's much less frequent.

If we sit back and say there should be zero repercussions (including but not limited to public humiliation) for verbal harassment, we are encouraging the behavior. Now, if you don't think it's bad behavior to begin with, then I can't change that. But if you understand why the act is wrong and how it hurts our sense of community and autonomy, then why not discourage the behavior by all social and legal means necessary?

[–]ragingfartalot[S] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So you're saying... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-rE03PGQfA

There is no right to not "feel" anything. The government does not legislate feelings. If there is a reasonable threat of harm along with the ability to carry it out, that may constitute a criminal threat. Fear alone (without reasonable objective grounds) isn't enough for a criminal charge because anyone can be afraid of anything. People regularly go on shows like Maury Povich because they have intense phobias to things like balloons or a jar of pickles: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gd2uDOIYKN0

The city started giving out tickets for the wrongful use of horns. You know what happened?

I'm not familiar with that case, but tickets issued for car offences are completely different from criminal offences which carry the stigma of a criminal record and often a fine/jail time.

But if you understand why the act is wrong and how it hurts our sense of community and autonomy, then why not discourage the behavior by all social and legal means necessary?

Yes, the criminal law focuses on acts of an accused in conjunction with the intent behind the actor. Both the act and intent are required. A victim "feeling harassed" is not an act or intention of the actor. It's a response by a victim, so it would be horribly impractical to create laws to protect people from "feeling" anything.

[–]CALAMITYFOX 90 points91 points92 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

This is kind of the same thing that happened with the hard core SJWs telling girls/minorities they will never succeed because of the White male patriarchy. At some point the SJW is the only one telling impressionable people they can't be Doctors, or succeed in business.

Another example is SJWs saying cops won't believe you if you have been rapped. I've seen more then enough evidence of women terrified to report rapes because they really think the SJWs are right and cops wont believe it.

[–]Rationalbacon 36 points37 points38 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

exactly, nobody has both a lower opinion of women and has stunted womens progress/happiness more than the batshit feminists.

if i was a conspiratard i would even think batshit feminists are a movement invented by male chauvinists to keep women down, as they are doing a better job than any sexist man could do.

[–]fre3k 12 points13 points14 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

WRT the conspiritard bit:

I think the whole SJW thing in general is designed to fragment the proletariat into micro-identities - the combinatorial conflux of every innate physical/mental attribute you can have that can be "oppressed" or "oppress". This causes us to fight among one another and fight for our micro-group's well being, rather than doing something about the bajillions of actual injustices in our societies.

To a mega billionaire with no morals, it's a no-brainer to do whatever they can to continue this endless cycle of poor/working/middle class in-fighting.

[–]ragingfartalot[S] 21 points22 points23 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-fulfilling_prophecy

[–]soxfan901 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Fucking hell, people are dense as shit. I have read a few articles about this. Every single one just blames men for not wanting to mentor junior female employees or spend time alone with them outside of work.

NOT ONE FUCKING WORD asking why they would feel that way. No "hey, Mr. Smith, why don't you want to give Sarah over here the chance to ruin your 25-year career and your entire life if she feels like it? Why do you feel more comfortable hanging out with Billy instead?"

NOT ONE FUCKING SENTENCE castigating false reports or saying that pretty much any attitude other than automatically believing accusers no matter what would ease men's concerns and bring those numbers back in line with prior figures.

It's never women's fault. Never. Everything is men's fault. And I understand that male sexual harassment of women is a big issue that's run totally out of control. I think most men get that. All we want is some assurance that if someone falsely accuses us decent men of wrongdoing of that nature, we won't be automatically thrown under the bus. Until we get that, you're going to continue seeing some of us not wanting to spend significant time with women coworkers under 50 outside of (and even at) work, period.

[–]ragingfartalot[S] 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Absolutely. Even the critics that come to this sub blame men and suggest if they feel uncomfortable, it's because they're the ones behaving inappropriately, even if they're only trying to protect themselves and their careers. It is nothing less than a witchhunt and a return to McCarthyism.

[–]BlackBoxInquiry 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Best response yet man. Nailed it.

[–][deleted] 143 points144 points145 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Yeah a sexual harassment lawsuits nets you millions, yet lose an arm you get like 500,000. Which I never understand I'd much rather have my ass touched than some of the gruesome accidents that happen that net hardly any money.

[–]asaasa19831 points 8 years ago [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link

OMG you're not a woman and it shows, do you know how awful it is to have your ass touched by some creep? HEEEEK!

But seriously, yeah you're totally on point. There is basically no guidelines on just ''how bad'' something is. He raped you twice? He touched your ass? He said your boobs look good in that shirt? All considered the same in the court of the #metoo movement!

[+]HeroBobGamer -27 points-26 points-25 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Are you saying you'd rather get your arm ripped off than get touched on the ass?

[–]tallwheel 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

OMG you're not a woman and it shows. HEEEEK!

[–]rg90184 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So you’re saying that we should organize our societies along the lines of the lobsters?

[–]jasperspaw 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Cathy, Cathy, Cathy.

[–]--Edog-- 56 points57 points58 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Standard definition of #MeToo = Feelz. All you need to know. The ugly guy asked you out vs. The hot guy asked you out. Feelz.

[–]SwampSloth2016 13 points14 points15 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Great job feminists !

[–]Daniel_Laixer 43 points44 points45 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

#MewTo

[–]IVIagicbanana 19 points20 points21 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This I can get behind.

[–]rg90184 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm a big fan of MewTwo's philosophy.

"I see now that the circumstances of one's birth are irrelevant. It is what you do with the gift of life that determines who you are.”

Kinda the opposite of the identity politics that SJWs espouse.

[–]chambertlo 20 points21 points22 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Stop hiring women, then.

I am so glad that this is happening.

[–]johnchapel 31 points32 points33 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Thats some top notch feminism there, ladies.

[–]rg90184 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why, I'd put it right up with making sure GridGirls lose their jobs.

Thanks Feminism.

[–]Casual_ADHD 26 points27 points28 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Can't have anything good amongst women. They hate one another. Can't help but compete.

[–]matrix2002 50 points51 points52 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Yep, there are going to be very real repercussions for a lot of the women using the MeToo movement for dumb ass shit.

This issue won't go away. Racism is a mistake that will get fixed, but gender differences are biological.

[–]deus_vult_bitches 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Lmao do you think there are no biological differences in race? Because that's absurd.

[–]matrix2002 15 points16 points17 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Not enough to justify the differences in how we treat people. White, Black and Asian men are much much closer biologically than white men and white women.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

the difference is culture, there is a black culture and there is a white culture and an asian culture

race isnt as much skin colour anymore its a lifestyle

but the culture of the person is only relevant to the specific country it is in as opposed to what black culture is in zimbabwe is not the same as inner city black people in london.

there is also the need to belong, and you can separate a black person from other blacks and have them live with white people and they will (more often than not) try to turn more to that culture

[–]matrix2002 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Culture has nothing to do with racism. We have cultural differences, but that doesn't mean we should put up with racism.

[–]marlybarrow -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Not really breh, there is more violent crime in the richest black neighbourhoods than there are in the poorest white ones. The poorest white students on average get the same SAT scores as the richest black students. Race is biological and it affects more than skin colour.

[–]whoisjohncleland 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

JonTron? Is that you?

[–]tallwheel 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Tribalism is mostly instinctual I think. It's possible for people to admit people of other races to their in-group under the right circumstances, but I think unfortunately there are always going to be racists. Evidence shows that babies tend to trust people who look more like their parents than people who don't. Tribalism (which can lead to racism) is biological in origin.

[–]Good2Go5280 59 points60 points61 points 8 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

Yet another reason I own my own business.

[–]EminentLine 14 points15 points16 points 8 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

You hiring?

[–]Good2Go5280 17 points18 points19 points 8 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Are you a chick?

[–]EminentLine 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I am not.

[–]Good2Go5280 19 points20 points21 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Would you rather be President or CEO? How does infinity dollars an hour sound?

[–]EminentLine 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Eh... I'd just be happy with minimum wage.

[–]SarahC 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'll be happy with minimum - 1$.

=P

[–]quantasmm 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

poor Sarah, already being paid less...

[–]roguetroll 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Can I be.the CTO and play.with cool tech?

[–]Good2Go5280 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don’t see why not.

[–]tallwheel 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Yes. And if you don't hire me you will be hearing from my lawyers. :)

[–]Good2Go5280 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

What are you wearing?

[–]tallwheel 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That's it. Skip the lawyers. I'm going to just destroy your reputation on social media instead. That's much faster and easier.

[–]Good2Go5280 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Dammit! My default setting is creepy sexual harassment guy. Please don’t destroy my mediocre reputation! Will you work for 70 cents on the dollar?

[–]Nano0k 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRnyfVgQbXk

[–]oneoftwentygoodmen 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

good for you buddy

[–]SweetzDeetz 25 points26 points27 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, good for him. I always respect small business owners because there’s no way I could do it.

[–]davisty69 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

As a new business owner (since August 1st) it is fucking terrifying.

[–]rg90184 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Any advice? Someday when I have the startup money I'd like to open up a little games shop.

[–]ozelegend 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

First comes the #mentorme then comes the mansplaining.

[–]poopmouth 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Pound Me Too.

[–]_bbrot 52 points53 points54 points 8 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

And then the same people who are partaking in the #metoo hype will be complaining about women being paid less because of (((sexism))) when in reality they aren't getting the training/mentorship they need to succeed in their field.

[–]isaidsheseffengoofy1 points 8 years ago [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link

(((sexism)))

I think you may be out of the loop on what those three brackets mean lately online.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triple_parentheses

[–]VicisSubsisto 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I doubt it. Seems more like pulling a /r/menkampf.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I'm not making a judgement here (I've never seen the triple parentheses before) but just reading the Wikipedia summary, as soon as I read "alt-right" I immediately became suspicious that this is actually anti-semitic at all. I'm not saying it's not, but lately the way people use "racist" and "alt-right" make me want to instinctively dismiss any statements made about either.

[–]nct57 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The thing actually is Alt Right, it become popular by The Daily Shoah.

[–]_bbrot 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I wasn't aware it was anti-semetic either , always assumed it meant something else

[–]isaidsheseffengoofy 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree with you that the terms racist and anti-Semitic (along with sexual harassment) have been thrown around so much in situations where they don't apply that they've practically lost all meaning.

I'm not sure what the OP's purpose was of putting that as it seems out of context but the triple parenthesis is used by the alt right to signify that someone is a Jew. So they might say something like "look at all our immigration issues, I wonder (((who))) is behind it. To me, that's pretty clearly anti-Semitic i.e. to imply that "the Jews" are behind nefarious things (in their mind).

[–]rg90184 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean, the echo quotes are not anti Semitic inherently. Hell, most of the time they're used for comedic effect. Most people in on the joke are aware of the mad ravings of conspiracy theorists, so when talking about a story that shows a well off ethnically jewish person as the actor in an action that would feed that conspiratorial presupposition the echo quotes are used.

Like "Mattias (((Krickstein))) makes regular donations to extremist group B in favor of extremist activity Q."

The comedy comes from the head slap that follows and the "of course it's a jew" response.

[–]WikiTextBot 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Triple parentheses

The use of triple parentheses or triple brackets, also known as an (((echo))), is an antisemitic symbol that has been used to highlight the names of individuals of a Jewish background. The practice originated from the alt-right blog The Right Stuff; the blog's editors have explained that the symbol is meant to symbolize that the historic actions of Jews had caused their surnames to "echo throughout history". The triple parentheses have been adopted as an online stigma by antisemites, neo-Nazis, and white nationalists to identify individuals of Jewish background as targets for online harassment, such as Jewish political journalists critical of Donald Trump during his 2016 election campaign.

Use of the notation was brought to mainstream attention by an article posted by Mic in June 2016.


[ PM | Exclude me | Exclude from subreddit | FAQ / Information | Source | Donate ] Downvote to remove | v0.28

[–]3pills 14 points15 points16 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

So you’re saying Trump was right about these things needing due process?

[–]tallwheel 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Due process is always good. Any president should know that.

[–]rg90184 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Trump was right again. It's happened so many times it's not even surprising. But somehow this makes him a sexist. Somehow.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

he also needs some due process

[–]a_bingo_goose 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I was expecting one or two lol. You know how to kareoke very well! Bravo.

[–]BlackBoxInquiry 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

It’s why when one of my daughters has friends over I always make sure that at least 1-2 other adult females are there.

I Don’t need any crazy lying bullshit because I didn’t let them opt for the large blizzard at Dairy Queen.

You know in this day and age where you are basically assumed insta-guilty and insta-convicted before tried and how dare any man be proud to be a man or want to the a father and participate in his kids school activities without other parents assuming you’ve some other motive other than being there for your kids.

Ever seen a woman use a bathroom at an elementary school? My wife did, she asked and the reply was; “Sure, no problem, it’s over there.”

As a father I had the misfortune of needing to use the facilities and upon asking the very same teacher was told; “the bathrooms are for students and faculty only.” - when not 20 min before my wife was directed to a bathroom by the same woman.

I let her know and her response was: “we just try to avoid any potential issues with males.”

Like what? I’m gonna go in there and drop trou and helicopter while taking a piss? So, I left the school grounds went to a store about a mile away and used their facilities.

I lodged a complaint with the district the following week.

Now they have a bathroom designated for male parents and different one for female parents.

Basically they temporarily take one restroom from the kids during plays and other events when parents come to the school (one boys, one girls restroom) and come complete with indicating signs, but I’ll take that any day over driving a mile.

[–]ragingfartalot[S] 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That is both heartbreaking and frustrating to hear. Thank you for sharing.

[–]NaughtyFred 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

#Leanout

[–]bryanrobh 13 points14 points15 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not worth the possible trouble anymore.

[–]rhgla 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I called that weeks ago.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

POUNDMETOO?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I wouldn't be comfortable with such an arrangement unless I had a prior relationship with the female employee or we were never alone without a camera present. That's just business nowadays. Protecting my career is more important than anything else when I'm at work.

[–]Excavateandfill 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I wouldnt hire a woman because of this. Too much hassle.

Why would i when i can hire a guy who shows up, does his work then goes home. No other associated bullshit

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

True story. Went to see my accountant.

She led me to a windowless room and attempted to close the door. I immediately told her to please leave the door wide open.

I don’t care who can hear us about my taxes. It won’t be nearly as damaging as being accused of sexual impropriety.

[–]kainvictus 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And today I sent my female coordinator a :stompyballs: emoji. We had a good laugh. YMMV

[–]btcftw1 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I was expecting one or two lol. You know how to kareoke very well! Bravo.

[–]nitudo25 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

you hit me, i hit back. gender or race no bar.

[+][deleted] -133 points-132 points-131 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

It's because half of those males are unattractive?

[–]alginon10901 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link

No, it's because the harmful shitstorm that the metoo movement incited when it got ouy of control is leaving men scared for their jobs

[+][deleted] -49 points-48 points-47 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I just making fun dude.

There's a decent meme making the rounds that illustrates the point.

[–][deleted] 31 points32 points33 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Oh, sorry mate. Word of advice, add /s after satirical comments

[–]davisty69 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Unless you couldn't give 2 shits about fake internet points...

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Not objectively looking like a dick is also pretty nice

[–]davisty69 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Meh, objectively looking like a dick to people I don't know and have no influence on my life, while I agree shouldn't be intentionally done, realistically means nothing.

There are no consequences besides the ones you make for yourselves with respect to karma and up votes.

[+][deleted] -59 points-58 points-57 points 8 years ago (38 children) | Copy Link

Maybe they're uncomfortable mentoring women because they struggle to understand appropriate work place contact. And maybe that's a problem for a lot of men. 🤷🏻‍♂️

[–]tmoneSpends too much time with ass cheeks spread apart 41 points42 points43 points 8 years ago (34 children) | Copy Link

if you think that the majority of workplace men are actually potential sexual assault cases, you might have to rethink your whole outlook. jesus Christ.

[+][deleted] -45 points-44 points-43 points 8 years ago (33 children) | Copy Link

If you think workplace harassment is a small and trivial issue in today's society you might want to rethink your entire outlook. Jesus christ.

[–]ragingfartalot[S] 23 points24 points25 points 8 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

The following statements are logically consistent:

  1. Rape is a problem, and we should support sexual assault victims.
  2. It is rational for men to protect themselves against false rape allegations, especially in a climate that increasingly accepts that we should "automatically believe the victim" and where we see accused persons having their careers and educational opportunities ruined based on allegations alone and without due process.

Do you believe these statements are mutually exclusive? If yes, why?

[+][deleted] -16 points-15 points-14 points 8 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

They are not mutually exclusive I just disagree that protecting yourself equates to avoiding working with women entirely. I can see why some people might want to do that, but I think people are drawing ridiculous conclusions about #meToo based on survey evidence. I think now is the time to drive conversations about appropriate due process, especially in the workplace. Many victims also avoid reporting harassment in the first place because such a lack of effective due process.

[–]ragingfartalot[S] 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

You're arguing against a point that no one made. No one is saying "avoid working with women entirely." People are saying they are avoiding potentially compromising situations where they have to work alone with a woman without witnesses. This is a rational response. Many professionals currently do this; for example, every lawyer I know will not meet with female clients alone in their office without another person in the firm present.

Furthermore, mentoring often requires spending time one-on-one with a person, so it's understandable that men have concerns about this. Here is an example from one poster here of the type of mentoring that we'll see less of in the wake of METOO:

I’ve coached high school girls basketball and been very successful for almost a decade (7 district titles and 3 state in 9 years). At the end of this year, I cannot in good conscious continue to do so for fear of allegations that while most definitely would be false, could prove damning to myself professionally and to my family. It’s heartbreaking, because I won’t be coaching my daughter as she gets into high school. But I cannot and will not make myself a target for some teenage girl or a woman that wants to advance her own agenda. I’ve always had female assistants due to not wanting to be in a situation that could be suspect, but now I don’t even trust my colleagues to do and say what’s right.

You go on to say this:

I think now is the time to drive conversations about appropriate due process, especially in the workplace.

It would be great to have that conversation, but then why begin the discourse with an abrasive comment like this: "Maybe they're uncomfortable mentoring women because they struggle to understand appropriate work place contact. And maybe that's a problem for a lot of men."

If SJWs were truly interested in equality, then they should also be railing equally against false accusers because that damages perceptions of rape victims as a whole, and harms the credibility of your whole movement, and contributes to the chilled relations between the sexes as we see it today.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

You

You're arguing against a point that no one made. No one is saying "avoid working with women entirely."

The article you posted

Almost half of male managers are uncomfortable participating in a common work activity with a woman, such as mentoring, working alone, or socializing together

The headline you submitted

Almost half are uncomfortable participating in a common work activity with a woman.

Okay I'll indulge that it can be rational to avoid compromising situations. But then tell me where the rational line is? What is acceptable male-female interaction in the workplace? Can men manage women and vice versa? Do we establish separate management and mentorship pools entirely? If you want to claim there's some obviously rational structure to interactions then explain what it is. Do you think men and women could work together in 1:1 situations in an environment with establish due process? Do you think it's possible a system like that could stand to benefit everyone? Or are gender relations a zero-sum power game where one gender must lose something for the other to advance?

you posting an anecdote a shitty outcome of the current state of society

Cool? Do you want a list of anecdotes of women that were abused at companies and the harassers had no justice? No you don't want that, because posting anecdotes about that isn't helpful for achieving any kind of ideological or pragmatic compromise.

Please explain to me how this:

Maybe they're uncomfortable mentoring women because they struggle to understand appropriate work place contact. And maybe that's a problem for a lot of men

Is incompatible with this:

avoiding potentially compromising situations where they have to work alone with a woman without witnesses. This is a rational response

You again:

[SJWs] should also be railing equally against false accusers because that damages perceptions of rape victims as a whole

You're absolutely right, they should. But if you turn every discussion into a strawman screaming battle where you project the most extreme things you see on social media/public discourse then you only the spin cycle.

harms the credibility of your whole movement

What is my movement? In this thread I'll argue that:

  1. Men can struggle to understand appropriate workplace contact.
  2. That happens because there are undefined expectations, and limited due process.
  3. The absence of adequate due process is bad for victims of false accusations as well as victims of sexual harassment.
  4. Instead of bitching about who is currently getting fucked harder, let's talk about specific ideas for creating a system of justice on this issue

If you want to have a discussion about any of those things, or maybe want to posit potential systems of adjudicating workplace disputes about sexual harassment, go right ahead. Otherwise, continue your circle jerk and have a great night. Hope you realize there's not some SJW boogey brigade on the internet.

[–]ragingfartalot[S] 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago* (14 children) | Copy Link

The article represents the results of a survey where men express discomfort/reservations about working with women. It is not prescriptive in any way, so yes, you were arguing with yourself. You used the words "avoid working with women entirely" and no one said that.

Before I answer your barrage of questions, another user u/Triangledimes has a spot on comment that I believe very accurately sums up the response here and the response that you're making to me here:

This is essentially the male #MeToo flipside where people are not only describing the shit they've had to deal with in regards to women, but also going one step further (something women really don't do often) and are finding an immediate and actionable solution to deal with it.

See when women complain about men they still put the power in the hands of men and demand them to be the agents of change. "Be better, treat me differently, stop doing these things." It's always women using power by having men do things for them, a they often do through other domains of life.

Men on the other hand aren't demanding anything of women right now. We're saying "we can fix this right now by doing our own thing over here and reducing risk." Once again, men are the agents of change, on their own accord. And still women complain about that, they don't want to be left to do shit on their own, they demand to be involved with men and exert that control. Women altogether suck at doing that so I think you're probably going to struggle with that and think it's too "mean" or whatever the fuck.

Okay, onto your questions (in which the implication is that men be the agents of change):

Okay I'll indulge that it can be rational to avoid compromising situations. But then tell me where the rational line is?

I'm not a legislator, but I will personally draw the line at interacting with women alone in a one-on-one situation where no other witnesses or people are present.

But this is a pretty irrelevant question. Participants in the METOO movement can't even draw a clear rational line on what constitutes sexual assault if we take the cases such as the Aziz Ansari allegations laid out here: https://babe.net/2018/01/13/aziz-ansari-28355

There are even articles such this one, where the woman talks about "cheating on her boyfriend with her rapist": http://www.elleuk.com/life-and-culture/culture/articles/a41425/cheated-with-my-rapist/

Can men manage women and vice versa?

That has been and is happening now. What do you think?

Do we establish separate management and mentorship pools entirely?

That is one possible way to mitigate risk. What do you think? Would that be acceptable to SJWs or would it be deemed non-inclusive or discriminatory?

If you want to claim there's some obviously rational structure to interactions then explain what it is.

Again you are arguing a point no one made. I've simply said it's a very rational decision for men to withdraw from mentoring positions that involve women given the low threshold for evidence required to ruin his career.

If someone were raped, and they brought their concerns about the handling of rape in society, would you then insist that they provide a "rational structure" to deal with the problem, and explain what it is?

Do you think men and women could work together in 1:1 situations in an environment with establish due process?

What would that look like? Do you think that?

Or are gender relations a zero-sum power game where one gender must lose something for the other to advance?

I don't believe it's a zero sum game but many SJWs seem to think so and subscribe to an oppression narrative that men are banding together to keep women down. This entire post is about men protecting themselves from false allegations.

But in the end, all these questions are irrelevant because the issue/topic of this specific thread is about men protecting themselves from false allegations of sexual assault, which they have every right to do. Just as any human being has the free agency and right to protect themselves against any sort of false claim.

Instead of bitching about who is currently getting fucked harder, let's talk about specific ideas for creating a system of justice on this issue.

What's your solution?

Hope you realize there's not some SJW boogey brigade on the internet.

Many SJWs are certainly responsible for attempting to curtail and limit free speech on the internet, and as I've said before, I believe METOO was originally a genuine and good-faith movement that has been derailed by a few bad actors and has now devolved into a witchhunt.

EDIT: Typos.

[+][deleted] -8 points-7 points-6 points 8 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

I think that your idea that men can't be alone with women in a work situation is basically sharia law and you're an impractical idiot

[–]ragingfartalot[S] 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

That's nice. Thanks for confirming my point about SJWs demanding that men be the agents of change, that they solve everything while offering no solutions themselves.

your idea that men can't be alone with women in a work situation is basically sharia law and you're an impractical idiot.

Again you've strawmanned my personal choice (and the personal choice of many men to withdraw from one-on-one mentoring situations with women in the workplace - which ironically would decrease the instances of rape and harassment) with something I advocate for everyone. And further conflate it with sharia law, thus demonstrating as clear as day that you have no idea what sharia law is.

[–]davisty69 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

We can now declare a clear loser to this one. Damn, you made that easy by throwing out childish insults.

Several decent arguments, and then you void it all by calling your opponent an idiot... Shameful

[–]SandsnakePrime 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Appropriate due process would it be the entire proceedings being held in camera, with anonymity on all parts, unless malfeasance is proven. Malfeasance may be in 2 forms, either a false accusation, in which case appropriate penalties, identical in severity, length, duration or any other measure as which would be applied in the case of an actual accusation.

The argument of then less will come forward only matters if the process is not neutral.

The largest problem is as has been noted to you multiple times in this thread. If simply the accusation of harassment, with zero evidence, validation or reality, can serve to ruin a career you have spent a lifetime building up, then there is a very strong risk analysis that leads directly to not spending time with a female co-worker alone, or unrecorded.

If you cannot see that this is the logical end game of any sexual harassment witch hunt, then there is very little left to be discussed to be honest.

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The largest problem is as has been noted to you multiple times in this thread. If simply the accusation of harassment, with zero evidence, validation or reality

When the fuck did I say this? In this thread, or ever? I just called for due process in the comment you replied to.

[–]ragingfartalot[S] 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The poster is not saying that you said it, but rather that it has "been noted to you" i.e., said to you.

[–]SandsnakePrime 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The largest problem is apparently NOT the accusation of harassment, but your reading comprehension. Cannot assist you with that, unfortunately.

[–]MasterBassion 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Really not sure why this comment is being downvoted so heavily.

Now IS a great time to drive conversation on due process. YES, sexual harassment (going both ways and coming from both sexes) is a big deal in the workplace and needs to be addressed, which is exactly where the conversation about due process needs to be introduced, and more importantly, upheld.

Edit: nevermind, after reading the rest of the insipid bullshit you're spewing elsewhere in the thread, it's probably because you're being a dick.

[–]tmoneSpends too much time with ass cheeks spread apart 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

show me some data or gtfo

also,

If you think workplace harassment is a small and trivial issue in today's society

I never said that. quit moving the posts.

[+][deleted] -9 points-8 points-7 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Lol okay

https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/task_force/harassment/upload/report.pdf

[–]tmoneSpends too much time with ass cheeks spread apart 14 points15 points16 points 8 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

approximately one in four women (25%) reported experiencing “sexual harassment” in the work place.

"alleged harassment." hardly the majority of men. which is what you implied in your original comment. which is what I called bullshit on.

gtfo.

[+][deleted] -9 points-8 points-7 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I hope you never have to work with women, or really anyone

[–]ragingfartalot[S] 21 points22 points23 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You have horrible reading comprehension and critical thinking skills. Or perhaps you are being deliberately obtuse. Nobody said that rape is a small/trivial issue in society.

Agree or disagree: the following statements are logically consistent:

  1. Rape is a problem, and we should support sexual assault victims.
  2. It is rational for men to protect themselves against false rape allegations, especially in a climate that increasingly accepts that we should "automatically believe the victim" and where we see accused persons having their careers and educational opportunities ruined based on allegations alone and without due process.

Do you believe these statements are mutually exclusive? If yes, why?

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

So you have no real rebuttal and move on to petty ad hominems. Typical.

[–]tmoneSpends too much time with ass cheeks spread apart 13 points14 points15 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

1) I work with plenty of women. I get along just fine.

2) that's not an argument. in fact, its the result of someone lacking the ability to articulate a well thought out rebuttal. it tells everyone that the person using them has lost.

you tried.

[–]WarpStoned 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm sorry.. but you're borderline brain dead.. Get some professional help, please.

[–]NotQuiteSane42 13 points14 points15 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe they're struggling to understand proper workplace contact because every person has a different idea of what that really means. While in the past, an innocent misunderstanding meant at most an apology or maybe a trip to HR to work out the disconnect, now the potential penalty for a single misstep with a woman is becoming a pariah and having your life ruined. Hell, even if you're perfect and you tread those eggshells without a single crack, some bitch might decide she doesn't have enough money or attention and jump on you anyway. So I can't really blame them for avoiding women in the workplace. To recount a famous feminist argument..."if 10% of a bowl of m&m's were poisoned, would you grab a handful?"

I know that sexual assault is a problem, but if you think this isn't, you're mad. The culture that's developed around this issue is absurdly predatory towards men, because the accuser is automatically right regardless of the circumstances to avoid hurting feelings. Even if the process goes through and it's decided that nothing happened, there will always be a significant number of people who think you're the scum of the earth, that the patriarchy saved your guilty ass and that a woman can't possibly be wrong. If you do manage to keep your job through the ordeal, good fucking luck ever getting a new one, or even lasting another year before the other women in the office get uncomfortable enough to band together to see you fired.

Consider this thought experiment: presuming you're a woman, exactly how many men's lives would you be able to casually ruin right now? Keeping in mind that there are no consistent penalties for false accusations in the #metoo age unless you're one hell of a repeat offender (or if you're pretty), and that all it takes is the hollowest of accusations to plaster a man's name and face all over the internet as THE GUY WHO SEXUALLY ASSAULTED THIS WOMAN maybe

If you're a guy, consider how many people in your life would be able to casually do this to you, should they spontaneously transform into awful people.

[–]ragingfartalot[S] 28 points29 points30 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Or maybe it's a rational/predictable response to a movement that has quite clearly become a witchhunt. Man shrug

[–]KaribouLouDied 13 points14 points15 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Stop victim blaming

[+]PunkAssGhettoBird -87 points-86 points-85 points 8 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Holy fuck, this is the most pathetic comment section I've witnessed in this sub.

[–]timurt421 31 points32 points33 points 8 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

What makes you say that? While I don't agree with everything, most of the top comments bring up really good points about there not being a standard distinction between what's considered sexual harassment/assault and what isn't and about how many women will abuse that lack of distinction to garner more attention or sympathy for themselves. Another great point is the existence of a very real double standard when it comes to sexual harassment/assault and how women would almost never be found guilty of sexual harassment or face the repercussions for doing the same things that a man would be found guilty for.

[+]codenamejeff -13 points-12 points-11 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Like the recruiter who is trying to hire my gf and keeps asking her to goto dinner with him. texting her at late hours of the night. And asking her how much money I make lol. Shit is fucked up. I find it silly, one of the comments above justifies the reasons why men should be worried and reads like one of those articles that says marijuana is bad because some guy fell off a cliff. like im sure bad things happen, but a lot of men are fucking weird.

[–]davisty69 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If course, and just as many women are weird, and by weird I mean shitty with regard to both women and men. In a movement that pushes women to come forward with allegations, and makes it clear that their accusations cannot be questioned or scrutinized, innocent men would be foolish to ignore the potential risk involved with mentoring, spending extensive 1 on 1 time, or socializing with a junior woman.

By making every accusation beyond reproach, the balance of power has shifted drastically. People, in general, are shitty. Therefore, men in senior positions must take precautions to protect their livelihoods.

Risk vs reward wins this all day.

[–]PunkAssGhettoBird -3 points-2 points-1 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Comments like this, which are of the majority here:

Standard definition of #MeToo = Feelz. All you need to know. The ugly guy asked you out vs. The hot guy asked you out. Feelz.

Courtesy of /u/--Edog--

Assuming everyone posting "Me too" is lying is exactly the same as assuming everyone posting it is telling the truth. Plenty more comments like that by obvious woman haters (because that's what this sub is).

Edit: It's blatantly obvious this sub is just filled with angry, ugly guys who can't get laid.

[–]--Edog-- 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes. I am an ugly, angry guy who cannot get laid - except I also have a wife, 2 kids, and I started having attractive women propositioning me for sex when I turned 17 (A lot of them were married, or had steady boyfriends...including bosses/owners/managers at various jobs...btw women are saints who never harrass men.) Not everyone on Reddit is a neckbeard.

[–]timurt421 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You can't just look at the stupid comments like that and cover the whole comments section with that blanket. And while I agree there are probably a ton of angry ugly dudes who can't get laid spewing bullshit around here, it doesn't mean that a productive discussion can't be had about important issues like this.

[–]tallwheel 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well it is now that I read your comment.

[–]tmoneSpends too much time with ass cheeks spread apart 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ohh nooeeesssss.

[+]Flash_hsalF -9 points-8 points-7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep

[+]ddukes2284 -71 points-70 points-69 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Sounds like a massive number of men who know they behave inappropriately and refuse to change their behavior. They probably shouldn’t be managing a damn thing.

It’s really not hard to be appropriate with people.

[–]ragingfartalot[S] 47 points48 points49 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Or perhaps it sounds like a massive number of men are taking rational steps to protect their careers and educational opportunities. As I said to another poster: Statistics I've read currently peg the false accusation rate at around 2 to 10% of all sexual assault accusations. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_accusation_of_rape

It's very difficult to determine precisely how many accusations are false, and in the absence of such data, it's very rational for men to be concerned about false accusations and removing themselves from potentially compromising work situations - a response that is predictable as it is unintended to the MeToo movement.

It's difficult to ignore the sheer number of examples such as the following (non-exhaustive list):

1. Canadian Woman fabricates racist death threats against man who loses his job:

Amjad first made headlines when she reported being the victim of racist threats ahead of the election. In an interview with CBC News, Amjad changed her story numerous times. She initially denied ever meeting or knowing Shawn Street, but by the end of an hour-long conversation she confirmed she'd met Street online and had gone on several dates with him.

LINK: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/nimra-amjat-racist-death-threats-school-trustee-charges-police-1.4510339

The falsely accused man Shawn Street lost his job:

What doesn't make sense is; if Shawn Street was brazen enough to use his own name and photo, why would he start a second account to make the threats? Street says he was "mortified" when he first learned his name was connected to the hateful, potentially criminal online posts. He went to Calgary police right away. "I told them everything, I told them right from the beginning how we met; dinner, lunches, everything," said Street.

LINK: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/nimra-amjat-racist-death-threats-shawn-street-police-not-investigating-1.4355351

2. Radio host loses job after accidentally touching a woman's bare back despite immediately apologizing

“I put my hand on a woman’s bare back,” he told the Star Tribune in an email. “I meant to pat her back after she told me about her unhappiness and her shirt was open and my hand went up it about six inches. She recoiled. I apologized. I sent her an email of apology later and she replied that she had forgiven me and not to think about it. We were friends. We continued to be friendly right up until her lawyer called.”

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/nov/29/garrison-keillor-fired-minnesota-public-radio-allegations-improper-behavior

3. Duke Lacrosse Case: Students on a lacrosse team were suspended and coach forced to resign in the face of sexual assault allegations that were later determined to be false

In response to the allegations, Duke University suspended the lacrosse team for two games on March 28, 2006... Duke president Richard Brodhead canceled the remainder of the 2006 season... Mike Pressler, the coach of the lacrosse team, received threatening e-mails and hate calls, had castigating signs placed on his property, and was the frequent victim of vandalism in the aftermath of the accusations.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_lacrosse_case#Aftermath

4. UVA Discredited Rape Story

The article, “A Rape on Campus,” was retracted in April 2015 after a Columbia Journalism School report that said the magazine failed to take basic journalistic steps to verify the account of a woman, identified only as Jackie, who said she was the victim of a gang rape. It was an embarrassing episode for a magazine that has long prided itself on its journalistic accomplishments.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/13/business/media/rape-uva-rolling-stone-frat.html

5. Woman falsely accuses 15 men of rape.

“Beale is responsible for fabricating a series of extremely serious allegations, which led to several extensive investigations being carried out and teams of detectives and specialist officers spending thousands of hours on the cases and providing support to her,” Detective Sgt. Kevin Lynott said in a statement. “Her manipulation of the criminal justice system has caused police to direct significant amounts of resource into investigating her bogus complaints as well as her own offending,” he added.

https://nypost.com/2017/08/25/woman-heading-to-prison-after-falsely-accusing-15-men-of-rape/

The irony here is, as men who decline to put themselves in potentially compromising work situations, they're acting rationally and taking steps to protect themselves.

Look at the shitstorms that regularly ensue whenever anyone suggests that a woman take precautions to protect herself from rape - you'll be bombarded with accusations of misogyny and saying "stop victim-blaming", "mansplaining", and "how about teaching men not to rape?"

But here, men are only acting defensively by removing themselves from potentially compromising situations and reducing their own risk. And yet they're still getting disapproval from people such as yourself.

In the current climate, no good deed goes unpunished. I think MeToo began as a genuine good-faith movement (and particularly in Hollywood it's not hard to imagine there being some toxic and unprofessional work situations), however it is has since been hijacked by a few bad actors and turned into a witchhunt.

A quote often credited to Voltaire: "To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."

The writing was on the wall as soon as Google fired that employee for the thought-crime of expressing his opinions on gender in a memo.

[–]davisty69 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

If you can't logically see the risk involved when careers/lives can be ruined without proof or due process, then there is no point explaining it to you.

[+]ddukes2284 -8 points-7 points-6 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yea you’re probably right. Wouldn’t waste your time trying.

[–]LowRentMegazord 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

At least you acknowledge your own limitations.

[–]tmoneSpends too much time with ass cheeks spread apart 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

if you think that the majority of workplace men are actually potential sexual assault cases, you might have to rethink your whole outlook. jesus Christ.

[+]basilobs -18 points-17 points-16 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Sorry women coming forward about being sexually assaulted is making you uncomfortable

[–]SaorAlba138 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So what you're saying is...

[–]ragingfartalot[S] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So what you're saying is, the increase in gang activity America is directly related to decline in spirograph toys.

[+]vogelbekdier -19 points-18 points-17 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thats not what that quote means or that org is about at all lmao ya’ll stay triggered

[+]ddukes2284 -32 points-31 points-30 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

There is of course anecdotal evidence to support the idea that a false accusation led to individuals losing their jobs. Five examples doesn’t prove anything. And men avoiding women in the work place based on five examples is the workplace equivalent of “letting the terrorist win”.

I will concede the point that false accusations occur. And when that happens those people should be punished, and if someone loses their job they should be able to take legal action against the accuser and the employer who didn’t conduct a thorough investigation; near as I can tell there isn’t anything preventing this.

But if the rate of false accusations is what you say it is (2-10%) that still leaves a massively disproportionate amount of factual accusations (90-98%). With that being the case I feel safe in my assumption that a man avoiding women in the workplace says more about his inability to behave appropriately, than it does about some man-hating agenda existing in the workplace.

[–]ragingfartalot[S] 19 points20 points21 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, I specifically indicated that:

  1. It was a non-exhaustive list for the sake of brevity and my own time, those were the ones that came easily to mind.
  2. It's difficult if not impossible to know the true percentage of accusations that are false.

And when that happens those people should be punished, and if someone loses their job they should be able to take legal action against the accuser and the employer who didn’t conduct a thorough investigation; near as I can tell there isn’t anything preventing this.

Every first year law student learns that even if you're 100% correct in the law, you can only recover judgment from a defendant if they have the money to pay you. So after exhausting time, money, and resources to defend yourself from a criminal charge, a wrongfully accused person has the burden of then trying to collect money from their accuser who may not even have the money to pay them back to restore their reputation and loss of income.

People respond to incentives. The current social and legal incentives are responsible for the climate we are in today. If SJWs were truly interested in equality, then they should also be railing equally against false accusers because that damages perceptions of rape victims as a whole, and harms the credibility of your whole movement, and contributes to the chilled relations between the sexes as we see it today.

If you want men to mentor women, then you have to create incentives for that to occur, and that's not happening under the current climate which can only be described as a witchhunt.

Furthermore, being the recipient of mentoring is not an entitlement or right. Someone who mentors you is doing so voluntarily out of the goodness of their heart. If the environment for such relationships to occur is made more hostile, no one is obligated to mentor anyone they don't feel comfortable with.

Is there an obligation for women to mentor men? That's news to me.

I will of course continue to work with women, but what is the reward-risk ratio for going out of my way to assist someone who may falsely accuse me of assault and ruin my career? Why would I, or anyone, put myself in a situation where I'm alone with a woman with no other witness if a mere allegation alone can destroy my livelihood?

With that being the case I feel safe in my assumption that a man avoiding women in the workplace says more about his inability to behave appropriately, than it does about some man-hating agenda existing in the workplace.

If a man used this argument vis a vis a rape victim, it would rightly be considered victim blaming. Suppose a woman wants to avoid male colleagues in one-on-one situations or in mentoring situations. What does it say about her? Absolutely nothing other than she wants to protect herself, which is her absolute right.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter