TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/seduction
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

      • Artful Prudence
      • A Voice for Men
      • Alpha Game
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Good Looking Loser
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • In Mala Fide
      • KillToParty
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Married Man Sex Life
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Power Moves
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • The Spearhead
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Good or bad idea

TaycoFlayco

December 4, 2017
312 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://i.redd.it/ayu5bpxeus101.jpg
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Good or bad idea
Author

TaycoFlayco

Upvotes 312
Comments 102
Date December 4, 2017 12:22 AM UTC
(8 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7hdlxj/good_or_bad_idea/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/good-or-bad-idea.909972
https://theredarchive.com/post/909972

Comments

[–]theothermod[M] [score hidden] 8 years ago stickied comment (0 children) | Copy Link

Your post has been removed because the title does not sufficiently explain its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested.

If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable.

So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people.

When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are any words you can cut out without losing any important information.

[–]idontcareifyouburyme 96 points97 points98 points 8 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

This idea is silly. -She can say that you forced her to sign it -She can say that she doesn't remember signing it. -She can say that what you did was outside scope -Potential to make you look creepy in front of a court

Not that I'm suggesting it but, technically, it is safer to say she consented to having your encounter recorded and somehow try to get that into evidence. Normally, it is unlawful to record someone without their consent unless the purpose of the recording is to use it as evidence that a crime has occurred. I suppose that could mean that the evidence wouldn't be allowed unless the witness perjured (which is a crime). Even then, you would hope that the presiding judge finds that the probative value of the tape will outweigh the danger of unfair prejudice.

But what the hell do I know? I'm not a lawyer. Just some dumb ol regular shmoe who barely knows crap about crap.

[–]flume04 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Isn't falsely accusing someone of rape a crime in itself?

[–]Hyrrokin 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, and even though the law is starting to prosecute it more harshly in recent times, some women still try it out anyways.

[–]Rick_OShay1 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

If falsely accused, deny everything and demand proof.

If you win that battle, launch a counterattack that tries to send her to prison for trying to send someone she knows is innocent to prison.

[–]moose-rider32 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

False accusations are tough to prove. Being found not guilty is not proof she lied

[+]icandrive1551 points 8 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

That's a laugh. A false accuser will get a slap on the wrist at most.

[–]hork23 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

"A female false accuser will get a slap on the wrist at most."

FTFY

[–]TaycoFlayco 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I some countries

[–]throwawaybabby3 119 points120 points121 points 8 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

That's a stupid idea. They can still sign if drunk/high, and the signature would mean fuck all.

They'll also be able to say "he forced me to sign it" and you'd be back at square one.

[–][deleted] 56 points57 points58 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Horrible idea. It documents your intent to have sex, proves you knew the girl, and is physical evidence.

The things it does not prove is that she signed it voluntarily. "He was angry, i was afraid if i didn't sign it he would hurt me!"

"Yea, i wanted to have sex with him, but when i told him to stop he kept going."

[–][deleted] 22 points23 points24 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You can use the same logic with every signed document then. What prove you were not forced to signe them at gun point? What prove you were not forced to signe them while drunk or drugged? The same argument could be used to nullifie EVERY contract in the world.

[–]FirePhantom 14 points15 points16 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Most important legal or financial documents have witnesses in addition to signatories.

[–]mactenaka 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Better bring a notary then. Safe sex or no sex

[–]Santaball 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The best way is to go your own way.

[–]fengpi 19 points20 points21 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They'll also be able to say "he forced me to sign it" and you'd be back at square one.

Patriarchal Jedi Mind Trick.

[–]Drezzzire 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

So there's basically no way to protect yourself-got it.

That's a nice critique of his idea.

How bout giving a better one eh

[–]DesignRed -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

/r/MGTOW

The only way to win the game is to stop playing by their rules

[–]Kinbaku_enthusiast 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

No, not playing the game is not to win. That path is extinction. It's an evolutionary lose condition.

Women aren't soviet russia. There's ways to protect yourself without taking yourself out of the gene pool.

And you can do so by not playing by their rules, so you're halfway there.

[–]DesignRed 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

There are almost 8 billion people of the planet. We are no where near extinction. You sound like a moronic breeder whose brain is only hardwired to reproduce or die.

No shit women aren't Soviet Russia, and I guarantee any bullshit method you spew is worthless against the power of the state. Women aren't the problem, letting the government into your life with a legal document that allows women to fuck you over at a whim is. You are handing women a loaded gun and telling them they can use it to kill you for any reason or no reason at all. To the surprise of no one, this has lead to marriages ending in divorce 60% of the time, with women initiating 80% of the time.

Let me know how you plan on "not playing by their rules" when they rigged the game in their favor and will cripple you socially, financially, and possibly physically if you try and fuck with their system.

[–]Kinbaku_enthusiast 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

You sound like a moronic breeder whose brain is only hardwired to reproduce or die.

"Sound like" is not an argument. Although yes we (you and me) are hardwired to reproduce (that's why we like sex). However, I was making a rational argument for reproduction. If you don't reproduce you end your personal genetic line. Probably also a large part of your cultural line, the things you care about, as nobody receives your personal contribution more than your children.

Women aren't the problem

I disagree. They're kinda the problem for voting for those government policies in the first place, but it's a problem that can be overcome.

letting the government into your life with a legal document that allows women to fuck you over at a whim is

I agree with this.

You are handing women a loaded gun and telling them they can use it to kill you for any reason or no reason at all

It's not quite that simple. Case in point: there are women paying alimony today.

To the surprise of no one, this has lead to marriages ending in divorce 60% of the time, with women initiating 80% of the time.

Agreed.

Let me know how you plan on "not playing by their rules" when they rigged the game in their favor and will cripple you socially, financially, and possibly physically if you try and fuck with their system.

Sure, it's a good question. What to do in face of a rigged system? Well I'd do the same as I'd do if I were an africanamerican slave: look for ways to maximise my influence and minimize risk. So I definitely understand the choice to mgtow. Not playing, is less risk (not no risk as you can still get unfair allegations at work or whatever). But it's also a choice with no upside. Would an african american who buys their own freedom... should he go live in the wild by himself (mgtow) or should he try to live in an unjust system?

Living by yourself is lonely. It may seem like a safe choice but it's not, it means you end your genetic line. It means you lack the same kind of companionship. An unjust system might screw you over, but it also might work out. I'd rather take a 20% chance at happiness than a 100% chance at loneliness.

Other things I'll do: not getting married even if I have kids, choose a partner carefully and be willing to move on at any time when there aren't kids, and be willing to do anything to make it work once there are kids.

I'll also make the gap of that choice as big as possible for her. I'll make sure she knows I'll do nearly anything to make the relationship work, but if she destroys it, I will make it my mission to make sure she regrets it. I'll also make sure she knows this implicitly rather than as a direct threat, so that it can't be used against me and that she'll feel safe with me.

That's how I play by my own rules. Of course it might still fail, but I'll be able to live with myself knowing I gave it my best shot.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Although yes we (you and me) are hardwired to like sex (that's why we reproduce).

FTFY

[–]Kinbaku_enthusiast 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, that's the better expression of cause and effect. Thanks.

Before condoms and the pill they were mostly the same, though.

[–]sneakpeekbot 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Here's a sneak peek of /r/MGTOW using the top posts of the year!

#1: What shocked you most about women?
#2: No WIFE = Super CAR | 117 comments
#3: Next time a slut attempts to justify her slutty behavior just show her this. | 151 comments


I'm a bot, beep boop | Downvote to remove | Contact me | Info | Opt-out

[–]aokusman 62 points63 points64 points 8 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Best is to record audio with your phone.

[–]fengpi 41 points42 points43 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Feminists are opposed to that. Cuz it cud totullee bee uzed fer revenge porn!!11!!!! /s

[–]aokusman 16 points17 points18 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Audio is not revenge porn.

[–]fengpi 19 points20 points21 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My intentional misspellings sort of intended to throw shade on the notion.

[–]Panel2468975 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Revenge porn for the blind…

[–]nitzua 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

the same way some cops/criminals are against body cams.

[–]Shippoyasha 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Or do one further and record the video of the signing and upload it on the cloud before it's deleted.

I know some professionals in various fields dealing with young women have to do that to protect themselves legally.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

For that to be legal, you have to record them saying they accept being recorded. Otherwise it could be inadmissable in court in many states.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Eleven states require the consent of every party to a phone call or conversation in order to make the recording lawful. These "two-party consent" laws have been adopted in California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington.

[–]aokusman 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'll take those charges over a rape charge any day.

[–]Kinbaku_enthusiast 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wouldn't it be discarded as evidence as fruit of the poisonous tree? Or is that a hollywood thing only?

[–]aokusman 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That's the whole point. If you intent to have sex or think it's possible start recording the c conversation that leads to sex.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Asking if they want to be recorded is a bit of a moodkiller though.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I record the entire act and then back it up to www.pornhub.com.

[–]kardz33 15 points16 points17 points 8 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Record audio on a voice memo or bambuser.

Something that you can lock your phone and it continues to record.

That’s all you need.

They will still throw the book at you (and they will), and you fight tooth and nail every Fucking step. Every step. You mock them, show no fear, and let them waste time.

I was accused of rape, and another felony. I fought for 16 months. They will drag shit out and drain your finances.

Never waive the right to a speedy trial despite your lawyers advice. Do not ever go in. A jury is the equalizer to all things. Take your chances, they don’t want trial.

Never give up and be ready to go down with the ship. You plead out you will never recover and never come back unless you leave the country. In the states it’s a 1 mistake world and even deals with non convictions have consequences. Do not fucking deal.

[+]Nissa-Nissa -10 points-9 points-8 points 8 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

I am a woman, and I find this chilling. If you assume something bad about me based on generalisations of women, you are acting like the feminists assuming all men are rapists. Most women do not deserve to be secretly recorded, and it is a violation of trust and privacy, even if it is small.

[–]NapkinZhangy 12 points13 points14 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You know what else is a violation of trust and privacy? Being accused of rape, having your face plastered everywhere, and having your life ruined.

[–]armaadi 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Option A. secretly record your interaction with a strange woman, and nothing bad happens. You have a lovely night, with or without sex. You go your own way or you stay together and have 20 kids, whatever. You delete the recording and that's it.

Option B. You don't record, and the same as everything above happens. No big deal.

Option C. You record, you have a great night and the cops knock on your door the next day. There have been cases when a recording is the only thing keeping a guy from serving a lengthy prison sentence and his name on the registry for life.

Yeah, it is chilling that in this day and age, the recommendation for men is to secretly record interactions with the opposite sex when it comes to possible intimate interactions.

And if you think this is chilling that you are assumed to be a monster based on your genitalia, welcome to being a guy.

/rant

Part of keeping yourself safe is analyzing your surroundings and having a good judge of character. Should you record every interaction with a woman? No. How about every time you meet a woman and that meeting might turn into something? Maybe. Depends on her demeanor and her outlook in life. This is no different than common sense things that women do to avoid dangerous situations and people.

Typically, we don't tell men to protect themselves except in the case of using a condom. Now that there's a bunch of cases where women have main bold, false accusations, men should protect themselves. I know a couple Uber drivers that have dodged potential jail time due to having their rides recorded.

[–]kardz33 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Stop bitching. It’s not video I suggested, its audio. And it’s not revenge porn, it’s holding you to account for consent. Can’t deal with it, kick rocks and don’t open your legs.

[–]Nissa-Nissa 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I didn't say it was video nor revenge porn. Just that it's lying to prevent more lies. Doesn't seem right and further ruins the relationships between men and women.

[–]kardz33 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There is no lying going on. Stop making shit up. Men can and should use audio to record an interaction.

There’s absolutely no reason they shouldn’t and nothing wrong with it. It’s just protection. Stop being a bitch and being offended. It’s the same as recording an interaction with police, it keeps people honest.

[–]ratbacon -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, this is hardly constructive.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

It's an acknowledgement that people lie, people with even egregious issues can appear normal for a short period, that alcohol and drugs cloud judgement, that perception often changes post hoc, that there's organizations on campus and in off campus life all but devoted to widening the definition of sexual assault to some pretty ludicrous levels, that sexual assault has been pretty much turned into a moral panic, that all sorts of people and organizations are openly misrepresenting stats to scare people, etc.

It's not about YOU at all. It's about the context. Trust me, if that guy has you in his bed, or is in your bed with you, he's hoping and praying that you're NOT the kind of person he truly needs to record. If he truly thought the worst of you, you'd still be back at the club.

[–]Nissa-Nissa 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So you lie first?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Many women have a system with their buddy whereby if a date is going sour, they have a code they send via text so that they can get a rescue. How is this different?

They clearly don't hope their date turns out so badly that they will need it, and would LOVE for it to go so well that it's not even necessary, but they still set that schema up to protect themselves against the worst possible outcome, don't they? And they sure don't reveal that schema to their date, do they?

This is exactly the same mindset.

In fact, there's entire businesses predicated around this mindset, like the women-only cab services, or online dating services where men can only talk to women if the women specifically approach them first. The ugly assumptions about the opposite sex that underpin those businesses are no different than the ugly assumptions that underpin an ABR scheme.

[–]fungo_bat 35 points36 points37 points 8 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

As much as I would think this has a good intent. It wont work for the variety of reasons as already mentioned. What if you sign it before hand and drink some booze before the sex? Or what if she claims she decides she did not want to do it after signing it? They can always use the "her consent can change at anytime before or during the intercourse."

Too many problems here.

I would say at least the last part of the card is good advice.

SHUT YOUR FUCKING MOUTH! SHUT YOUR FUCKING MOUTH! SHUT YOUR FUCKING MOUTH!

  • Consider, no one is your friend at this point!

  • Don't talk to your commander especially after he reads you your article 32 rights, military equivalent to Miranda.

  • Don't talk to anyone in your chain of command.

  • Someone from your chain may call you up and ask you what happened? That person is an agent on behalf the United States Government and the convening authority. That person is in official capacity when they talk to you. You may think that they are just trying to get to the bottom of it. But anything you say to them can be used against you.

  • Don't talk to the investigator (AFOSI, CID, NCIS) at all without a legal defense council or a civilian hired lawyer. That agent is going to try to get you to give information that they will definitely use against you. Don't try rationalize, don't try to feel like you need to cooperate. They will want you to cooperate, so they can hang your ass. The agent will tell you he is going to do you a favor. He will tell you that he has been in this game, a loooong time and tell you how this all will play out if you don't work with him. Thats fine. All you need to say is that you invoke your Article 32 rights and want your attorney now. Don't care about trying to be hero. Don't try to think that if you fess up you get brownie points. Nope, keep your mouth shut! Even if they cuff you and take to the lockup. Better that, than surrendering your rights. You help in any way you will be probably locked up for much longer, with a punitive discharge.

Believe me when I tell you that the accuser has everyone on her side, the chain of command, the Agent in charge, the JAG, two cackling hens and the last but not least special sexual assault coordinators who are doing everything in their power to groom her testimony and shape the case against you. You have no one on your side except your lawyer.

Source, current a Reservist and once a supervisor.

[–]Blutarg 12 points13 points14 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Always have a lawyer. Always always always.

[+]evg961 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

Lol good luck getting anywhere when you whip that thing out

[+]memeirlguy121 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Well, what's supposed to be the solution then? Trust them not to falsely accuse you in the rest of your life? Lying about your name? Getting an appointment in court to let a judge verify it before you have sex?

[+]evg961 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

don't have sex with insane women maybe ???

[–]WildHuntsman 24 points25 points26 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'd keep it gender neutral.

[–]HeForeverBleeds 12 points13 points14 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's probably like this because women rarely have to worry about being accused of rape, falsely or otherwise. And even when they are, how often do they actually have to worry about facing a legal conviction for it? People already don't believe when men say they are raped by women, left alone if he has no evidence

A woman likely wouldn't need one of these; if a man accuses her of rape, she could just claim that he raped her an automatically the focus will be shifted to the man. Or she could just deny it and chances are that will be the end of it

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Still, no point in not having it gender neutral.

It wouldn't work, anyway, but if you were doing this, there's no need for it just to say Partner 1, specify full name and sex, then the same with Partner 2. Threesomes are something you shouldn't have unplanned anyway.

[–]SoulofEquality 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wouldn't work. It's not a real legal document, and would basically mean fuck-all if taken to court.

[–]Mallago 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Useless. Anyone can still sign even if drunk or lie, or just say they were forced to.

[–]Elkubik 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That logic means you can nullify any other signed document in that case

[–]2JMAN89 -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not a bad analogy when it comes to "rape" since a women can change their consent at any time before during or after. So in a sense, yes they can nullify whatever they want too. Don't trust that yes will mean yes even then next day

[–]cld8 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

This would do absolutely nothing. The woman can simply say she changed her mind later. Consent can be withdrawn at any time.

[–]numquamsolus 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Feminists have apparently introduced a notion of retroactive withdrawal of consent. Seriously. Insane.

[–]cld8 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Well to be clear, the law does not allow retroactive withdrawal. However, consent can be withdrawn going forward. If you are having sex, you can say "stop" at any time, which ends your consent, but you cannot retroactively withdraw consent for something that already happened and that you consented to.

[–]numquamsolus 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

https://feministphilosophers.wordpress.com/2017/05/12/retroactive-withdrawal-of-consent/#respond

[–]cld8 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I was just clarifying what the law says. I'm not sure how someone's blog post is relevant.

[–]numquamsolus 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I was referring to a new feminist philosophical notion.

I wasn't referring to the law. In any case, law is highly jurisdictional, so I'm not sure what law you were referring to unless it is the UCMJ.

I hope you are clear on the relevance of the blog.

[–]cld8 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In any case, law is highly jurisdictional, so I'm not sure what law you were referring to unless it is the UCMJ.

This particular law is pretty standard across most jurisdictions.

I hope you are clear on the relevance of the blog.

No, I am not. It seems like some random Wordpress site. Anyone can put one of those up and write whatever they want.

[–]hork23 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not feminists, women.

[–]hughville 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

it's a bad idea to put a condom in your wallet.

[–]2JMAN89 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Why?

[–]hughville 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

according to most manufacturers, if not all of them, the heat and constant pressure weaken the structural integrity of the condom, making it easier to break.

it can mess up with the latex or even dry up the lube it has.

[–]2JMAN89 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

How long does this take? I generally only put one in there if I'm going out and if it's unused, it get taken out in the morning

[–]hughville 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

As a physician I can say it's generally a bad move, but I don't know the specifics.

I guess it'd depend on the normal temperature and humidity of where you live, the amount of heat you let off and how much ass sweat is getting through your pants to your wallet.

I'd advice keeping them not DIRECTLY on you, meaning not on a pocket or wallet, an Altoids tin would be better (though still not as optimal as keeping them in a dry place at home).

EDIT: On further research, condom manufacturers say that if you are using it that night, then its okay for you to have it in your wallet; so just make certain you aren't taking the same condom for a spin and you should be safe.

Also, glove compartments are a NO-GO.

[–]2JMAN89 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I've dealt with that melted rubbery mess. Defiantly no for the glove compartment. Especially in a 100 plus summer. Not fun

[–]MisterDamage 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nothing idea. She can revoke consent at any time. She can even tell you she's revoked consent if she really wants to.

[–]MaestroLogical 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Under duress.

[–]Roguta 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This will be tossed out in a second for the same reason prenups are. "Signed under duress." Moreover they will claim an intoxicated person can neither sign a legal document nor give consent.

So, unfortunately, utterly useless.

[–]stevoism 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You could just not sleep with other military since there’s already other rules against it as is. UCMJ goes past just getting consent
And they can sign then change their mind. They can get their but then say stop. If you don’t, rape

[–]McFeely_Smackup 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

it's apparently aimed at US military personnel, and the U.C.M.J. does not recognize any defense to having sex with a person under the age of 18...you either did or you didn't, intent and consent doesn't matter. So you damn well better accept an Article 15, because otherwise you're demanding a Court Martial and they will.

[–]fungo_bat 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Pretty much. An article 15 is probably not goina happen anyway in this political climate of two certain senators who would assume have an innocent person hang. Any sexual act as a military member is probably going to an article 32 hearing if accused, unless you are being accused in the civilian population. I hear, if they can leave it to the civvies, versus requesting jurisdiction, they will nowadays absolving them of any backlash if the case does not go the way of two above senators.

Here is the other thing where one can get double tapped. You get convicted of sexual assault in the civilian court but you did stuff that was considered lewd behavior, they can opt to bring up military specific charges under the UCMJ. They can do that anyway even if you get acquitted by the other court. Its not double jeopardy because some military crimes are specific and separate from the civilian charges. I have even seen this with the court martials, the defendant gets off of the more serious charges, but they still have evidence that you did the other things, they may still nail you for the other charges resulting in jail time and a punitive discharge.

So advice for newbs or soon to be newbs.

Don't fuck!!

[–]SUPERBirdplane 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean... I guess? False rape accusations would be less common, but the belief that a yes is required for sex is bullshit. You’re not gonna stop mid-foreplay and show them this now are ya?

[–]scaredofshaka 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It doesn't work since things can change during intercourse. The safest course is to have recordings and social media exchanges before, during and after sex, and a video statement from both stating that they are ok to be filmed. 21st century si so hot and sexy.

[–]Rick_OShay1 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If falsely accused, deny everything and demand proof.

If you win that battle, launch a counterattack that tries to send her to prison for trying to send someone she knows is innocent to prison.

[–]Floppuh 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Actually this would be worse for men that may be falsely accused, because this is proof that they knew the person and that they wanted to have sex with them, while she can make up whatever the fuck to suit the narrative. "I was scared he'd hurt me if I didnt sign it" "I was drunk" "He signed it". This is bullshit. The only solution is innocent until proven guilty. Cant believe we even have to argue over this

[–]Hejgyrus 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

U might as well not bother with women at this point.. Go gay

[–]SpeaksTruthToPower 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women will never consent to anything that removes their power to criminalize men on nothing but the syllables that issue from their traitorous, insular mouths.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Any lawyers here?

[–]FullMcIntosh 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why has god forsaken us.

[–]Sarin_G_Series 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Good idea or not, this is military; service members can be required to carry and use these involuntarily.

[–]alpha-buck 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The worst thing about this is that men would be accepting that we are the perpetrators of rape. The military wouldn’t give this card to a female and say the same thing.

[–]Male_Positive 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Masturbation is the best solution. No STDs, no false rape claims, no 20 years of child support.

[–]Dorian_castillo 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ask for her dads permision ten out of ten idea

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A recording of your request and her verbal consent would be better, although in some states you would have to inform the woman that you intend to record her giving consent. That might not go over so great in the bedroom.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Unfortunately it feels necessary.

Have to sign the Consent Forms before sex.

[–]croidhubh 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Won't hold up anyway.

[–]Jammersault 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It would need to have the signature of someone who witnessed the signing of the consent card. But once the door closes and the witness is no longer present, she can still say that while she consented to the idea at the 'consent meeting' she changed her mind once no one else was there and that the bloke refused to stop. So I guess the only thing to do is heavily promote orgies so that sex never ever happens without literally having witnesses present. Ridiculous !!!

[–]FenrizLives 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

lol if you show that to a chick you ain’t ever getting laid my dude

[–]SchmidtytheKid 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's the most romantic thing I've ever seen

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

A lot of you don't seem to understand how legally binding contracts work.

If one party claims "I was too drunk when I signed it" or "he forced me to sign it" or whatever, then the burden of proof is on that party to prove that any foul-play was involved.

As for whether this piece of paper is legally binding or not, it depends on the jurisdiction. For example, in some countries, even verbal contracts are binding. I would suggest using a signed affidavit instead. More official and definitely legally binding.

[–]hork23 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You must be new here. Yes, the burden of proof ought to be on the one making the claim. However, that has been changing for the past few decades (in certain respects). Just look at the latest iteration of this erosion of rights, Yes Means Yes. It presumes the guilt of men and he must provide a positive defence that he in fact did not violate the law. Or the 'Dear Colleague Letter'. Or the multitude of articles that describe a man being sent to jail on the word alone of a woman.

Concerning legally binding contracts, a raising trend of judges have been throwing out pre-nups. A precedence has been set in which contract violation by women hasn't been enforcement, of what worth is such a document with women then?

Most here know how contracts ought to work, but how they really work is a difference thing, especially when women are involved.

[–]yeoxnuuq 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

After 7 years in the Army and being an MP I think that things are good idea for Service Members. The DOD as a whole wants to look tough on sexual assault so they will crucify any male regardless of evidence or lack of evidence for an accusation of sexual assault. And as anybody knows thats been in the military there is a hell of a benefit to females claiming they were sexually assaulted, all kind of perks.

As an MP out of probably 200 sexual assault cases only two were valid that I ever dealt with.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter