TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/seduction
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

      • Artful Prudence
      • A Voice for Men
      • Alpha Game
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Good Looking Loser
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • In Mala Fide
      • KillToParty
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Married Man Sex Life
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Power Moves
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • The Spearhead
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

The problem with how men perceive rape | Professional victim explains how her saying "yes" to sex and regretting it later is all men's fault because she has no agency and can't make decisions for herself. Thanks feminism.

EricAllonde

September 20, 2017
558 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://archive.is/7XpJF
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title The problem with how men perceive rape | Professional victim explains how her saying "yes" to sex and regretting it later is all men's fault because she has no agency and can't make decisions for herself. Thanks feminism.
Author

EricAllonde

Upvotes 558
Comments 142
Date September 20, 2017 7:52 AM UTC
(8 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/719kof/the_problem_with_how_men_perceive_rape/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/the-problem-with-how-men-perceive-rape.914120
https://theredarchive.com/post/914120
Red Pill terms in post
feminism
Top posts by EricAllonde

Kathy Griffin whines about her fee for hosting NYE telecast on CNN, tries to claim gender pay gap, is firmly slapped down.

26663 upvotes
January 1, 2019
/r/PussyPassDenied

I'm seeing more and more of this: feminists using "mansplaining" accusations to deal with being publicly proven wrong

11347 upvotes
September 7, 2017
/r/MensRights

Female BBC manager publicly declines promotion over pay inequality | After she threw a public tantrum, it's revealed that the male manager had several years more experience than her, justifying the difference in pay. The BBC is standing firm for once - good for them!

9152 upvotes
May 22, 2019
/r/PussyPassDenied

Who Would Win? Vidcon edition: answered

9072 upvotes
June 29, 2017
/r/PussyPassDenied

College tells construction crew to take down "Men Working" sign deemed 'sexist', even though it was accurate as the crew included zero women | Though women don't want to do dirty, manual labor jobs themselves, they still want to control how men do them

7812 upvotes
January 23, 2017
/r/MensRights

Looks like a great campaign to help tackle male suicide

7265 upvotes
April 24, 2018
/r/MensRights

Imagine the outrage & hysteria if an article like this was written about women: "So thirsty I could drink the pool"

5808 upvotes
August 5, 2016
/r/MensRights

Woman divorced her husband and got $15m. He later listed his company on the stockmarket and earned $93m. You guessed it: she's now suing him for more money...

5662 upvotes
April 5, 2017
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]fengpi 196 points197 points198 points 8 years ago (38 children) | Copy Link

Women get socialized to put their needs second and make other people happy

My god. Why did these flawless light-beings of angelic purity ever leave their higher, ethereal dimension of unalloyed goodness and cloak themselves in human flesh upon this shit-stained mudball full of wild beasts called Earth? Is this divine punishment for some kind of sin that we mere Homo Sapiens cannot comprehend, like the fall of Lucifer from paradise?

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 133 points134 points135 points 8 years ago (31 children) | Copy Link

Must be why women always risk their lives for others or end up working shitty jobs they hate to support a family they rarely see.

[–][deleted] 39 points40 points41 points 8 years ago* (30 children) | Copy Link

Well, the latter is happening more and more in today's America, to be honest...

EDIT: Guys, come on...there are single Mom's out there busting their hump in a shit job to take care of their kids. Exception? Sure, but don't downvote me for speaking truth.

[–]omegaphallic 13 points14 points15 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I upvoted you, I think we can make the point without putting down women.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My point exactly.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Key word "single Mom's"; as soon as she has the opportunity she will go back to freeloading when she can find some other sucker to pay for her and her kids.

[–]Tefai -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Gross generalisation, just like shitty identified rape culture and problems with so called men. You don't want get lumped into that group if you have done nothing to deserve the negative slur.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah no it's not. Exceptions don't make the rule.

[–]Tefai 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It is interesting that, some how you think I'm the one stating an exception to the rule. You know you read on this sub and there are some people who are informed, and clearly are not making sweeping statements based on their personal experience but based on facts. And then there are people like you...

[–]trenescese 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

McDonald's isn't a shitty job. Being a garbage collector is, for example.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

Not sure what that has to do with anything, but OK...

[–]trenescese 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Flipping burgers in McD isn't "taking a shitty job". Shitty jobs are still over 90% male.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Housekeeping/Bathroom cleaning is 90%+ female, you want to tell me that's not a shit job?

You guys are trying to hard to prove a point that no one is invalidating. Quit trying so hard.

EDIT: Y'all realize that one of the reasons women are getting "shit" jobs is employers are shying away from hiring men, right?

[–]Vandechoz 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

a better one would be nursing, their stories are terrifyingly disgusting

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Agreed.

[–]omegaphallic 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Depends on the home. Still you unlikely to run into food that has been rotting in the sun for hours till it smells so bad you want to puke.

Not that being a housekeeper isn't challenging and unpleasant in its own ways.

[–]bufedad 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Housekeeping/Bathroom cleaning is 90%+ female, you want to tell me that's not a shit job?

Compared to Trash collecting? No, it's not a shit job. It can actually pay quite well if you aren't stealing from people and getting fired.

[–]omegaphallic 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Trash collectors don't have to deal with mental ill old people who get violent.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Garbage collectors have to deal with all the shit and filth that society throws out. Seems CBS has a list of the Top 10 Deadliest Jobs with garbage collecting coming in 7th. Not many women in these occupations.

[–]dungone 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You're losing the argument here. Garbage collectors have one of the most dangerous jobs. Housekeepers and nurses don't even make the list.

[–]bufedad -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Says who?

[–]hahayeahthatscool 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

jesus you really need some Bill Burr

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hitc8haEu_g

you look ABSOLUTELY bizarre trying to compare one of the most comfiest positions a human can obtain (stay at home parent) to things like Trash Collecting and Coal Mining. Just completely and utterly bizarre, man.

[–]snake_and_scorpion -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

employers are shying away from hiring men

What are some of the reasons that employers may shy away from hiring men?

[–]Aivias 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Being a single mother is not inherently worthy of respect. It very possible her own bad decisions led to her predicament.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Again, we can prove our points and advocate for Men's rights issues without denigration or disrespect. I suggest you adopt this tactic. Until you do, you're just another Red Piller.

[–]Aivias 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Respect is earned, it is not a state of being that all people embody.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Crazy idea: Be the bigger man and embody some respect, nephew.

[–]Aivias 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

No person is deserving of respect until they prove it so, Im unsure as to why you are dead set on retardedly confusing manners with respect.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm unsure why you're 'retardedly' refusing to respect people. It's got to be a lonely way to live, man.

[–]Aivias 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not 'people' but very specifically single mothers.

Where I live being a single mother is a fucking aspiration for girls because they will be looked after by the government through money and housing. Its also indicative of low intelligence and an inability to think forward and thats before we get into the increases in illegal behaviour and imprisonment for their sons and promiscuity leading to more single motherhood and a perpetual cycle for their daughters.

The fact is you cant just automatically say single mothers are great people unless you know why they are in that position. Sure cant be saying a womans useless if her man skipped out on her or died but to say that we have to respect them is just plain wrong.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I must have tried to have sex with hundreds of women when I was younger and not married. Where were all those angelic women back then? I mean, my success rate was something like one in thirty or less. Even women who I got to the bed sometimes refused to give sex even when they were very happy to receive it (you know what I mean).

Most women don't have absolutely no idea of how dating and sex works from the viewpoint of those who have to do most of the work.

But this was in the 80s. So, perhaps I just don't understand the world of Tinder.

My wife, by the way, has said that she had sex tha she later regretted - but so she has regretted other things she has done (as we all have). In her opinion sex isn't that big a thing. In other words she's not the entitled bitch the writer of the article seems to be.

Hell, I have had sex that I'd rather forget about.

Shit happens, carry on.

[–]omegaphallic 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The Lesbians call the women like that Pillow Princesses, they recieve, but not to give.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

/r/ihavesex is this way...

[–]TheBeardedSatanist 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well see it all goes back to Pandora's box, when one curious cunt decided to fuck up all the perfect and flawless women by opening a box of bitchiness and sprinkle that shit all around like fairy dust. Because, y'know unlike the rest of humanity women don't have the capacity to do wrong without the influence of a straight white cis man.

Oh /s btw

[–]fengpi 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sure, Pandora might have opened the box to take a peek, but who made the box, filled it up with evil and put it into her hands and used reverse psychology to make her think of opening it, hmmm?

Hint: THEY HAD DICKS!!!111!!

[–]RonDonVolante92 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Must be the reason theyre a staggering 7% of workplace death victims and less than 1% of soldiers to die in battle.

[–]dadibom 89 points90 points91 points 8 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

well what's the solution? to view all women as minors, unable to make their own decisions and therefore unable to give consent?

[–]fengpi 61 points62 points63 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh, hey, don't you dare say a woman can't sign a loan form or job application with 100% self-possession. Only when sex is in the air does her resolve go the way of a melty ice cream cone before a blast furnace.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 50 points51 points52 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Given that women are socialized to be meek and agreeable they need a strong paternal type to make decisions for them.

Perhaps a father or brother could be in charge of deciding when she's allowed to have sex and with whom.

[–]FrogTrainer 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

lol, beat me to it.

[–]FrogTrainer 24 points25 points26 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Maybe we should create a society where you have the get the father's permission instead, since the woman can't decide things on her own. Then after marriage it's the husband's job to make all the woman's decisions for her.

[–]fiercealmond 29 points30 points31 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

lol feminism went full circle and became the patriarchy

[–]Filter201 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Arguably it always was. Patriarchy / elitism is about men at the top giving privilege to young women and oppressing young men to bring the women closer to them and keep the competition at bay.

A sizable minority of these young privileged women are smart enough to leverage that privilege into a position of power.

Meanwhile a minority of young oppressed men, sacrifice and work hard for a chance to win the success lottery and join the elite. Said success lottery is there to keep men hopeful that they won't always be oppressed.

There's not necessarily an explicit conspiracy to make things this way. It's just that all the motivations of the various parties in power are aligned to make it so.

Infantry women feminists do it out of misplaced altruism (for other women) and selfish bias. Women feminist leaders are some of the aforementioned privileged women who leverage their privilege into a position of power. They are aided by the elite who like to keep people distracted by the gender war instead of the real source of the vast majority of people's woes which is class inequality.

So right from the start, most feminist goals are aligned with the elite's goals.

But there's another force that make feminism very similar to patriarchy. Feminism seeks to empower women without holding them accountable for anything. This translates into holding men accountable for women's weaknesses and then making men responsible for empowering women out of these weaknesses. While at the same time claiming that women cannot be made responsible for addressing their own weakness. This is hyperagency of men and hypoagency of women: key ingredients of the patriarchy (depending on the definition of the day).

[–]w1g2 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

holding men accountable for women's weaknesses and then making men responsible for empowering women out of these weaknesses

best definition of feminism i've ever heard.

[–]fiercealmond 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Interesting post, thanks

[–]Vandechoz 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

and really they shouldn't be walking around alone outside, it's not safe! they need to have a male member of the family escort them

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

We already do that in practice regardless of the law. The goal of feminism since the 1960's is to ensure women have zero moral agency when it comes anything negative and they have succeeded.

[–]number4ty7 34 points35 points36 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh my.

This is top drawer mental gymnastics here. This one should make the olympics.

Oh my giddy aunt, I'm overcome with the mirth.

[–]HeForeverBleeds 27 points28 points29 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

This whole thing is a bunch of one-sided hypocrisy. The fact that she mentions Dennis’s “implication” and not Dee’s from the same series (basically, if a guy says “no” to sex, blackmail him into it by threatening to cry rape) makes her hypocrisy very clear

In general everything she’s saying falls apart when it’s applied equally, because how often are men also pressured into unwanted sex by women or have sex with a woman while drunk and later regret it? Women do all the same crap to men that she’s accusing men of doing to women, so if people started applying such a broad definition to rape, there would also be vastly more women being arrested for the crime and vastly more men being victims of it as well

“Many of the most traumatic and damaging sexual experiences, particularly ones faced by women who have sex with men, don’t even meet the legal definition of rape.”

‘Particularly ones faced by women who have sex with men’ according to what? In most places, a woman literally forcing a man into sexual intercourse isn’t charged with rape unless she penetrates him with an object because rape is defined as the rapist penetrating a victim

She’s making it sound as if women sexually violated by men have a harder time getting taken seriously in the CJS than men sexually violated by women. What alternate universe does this author live in?

[–]fengpi 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The fact that she mentions Dennis’s “implication” and not Dee’s from the same series

Hey, how can the author possibly remember two things from the same show? Especially when the second item would utterly destroy her thesis? Sheesh!

[–]Xorism 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The argument against men is typically "men are strong enough to stop sex if they really want to".

Which is sad

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

In other news, the word microagressions pisses me off.

[–]DRU-ZOD1980 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I feel your being pissed off is a microagression.

[–]ArrestedDevelopments 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Don't microaggress him bro

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Triggered.

[–]heisenberg747 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The word "microaggression" gives me macroaggressions.

[–]fiercealmond 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

this gave me a microorgasm

[–]AmazingFlightLizard 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This gives me a macroorgasm.

[–]mrwhibbley 18 points19 points20 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Good news! She wasn't raped. She had multiple consensual sexual activities that she may have regretted later or maybe would have preferred not to have done but did willingly anyway. Seems like she is also bad a asserting herself and picking men to meet. And to think that some guy invites you over to share his bed is a joke. I'm not saying anyone ever has to guarantee sex, but to almost act surprised that you were only going there to sleep is literally retarded. What's wrong with your bed? Were you there from out of town? Come on, grow up and take responsibility for your actions.

[–]Tuckr13 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The part that gets me is she said she knew from the moment she went into the coffee shop, she didn't have a connection.

But still slept with him. That was a choice. It was her choice to stay with him instead of bailing, and her choice to go and bang him...

God damn feminists...

[–]feeds-snails 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah that part was pretty stupid. It was an on-and-off hookup and she just thought "you know what, sleeping with this guy sounds like fun. Oh God he wants to have sex? What? Where...but...how... Rape!". No fuck he wants to have sex. That's what hookups do.

[–]mrwhibbley 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I am guessing she didn't say no to dinner out or whatever else she got from the relationship

[–]fengpi 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

If you get naked on top of a man's erect penis, he just might date-rape you. But it's no fault of your own, of course.

It's because he was an asshole. A patriarchal asshole. You? You only crave the cocks of good, honorable gentlemen who would never have sex with you unless you were 100% ready for it. And if he were a good, honorable gentleman for realsies, you would have no regrets.

[+]viper12a1a1 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link

Before you ask for consent, ask if she's a feminist. If she is, bail. She'll probably decide you raped her later.

[–]Pseudonymble 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's a sound theory, but I know some brothers have real low standards... source: last call at any bar.

[–]infinitethrill 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Hmm try asking upfront to make an informed decision.

Problem with that is Feminists also lie.

[–]viper12a1a 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Most successful thing I've seen is to install security cameras with audio in your house, then put "monitored by camera" signs around the house.

Then only sleep with randos at your house. It's the best "cover your ass" possible.

I remember a guy getting acquitted because of that exact thing but I can't find the article. It was a few years ago.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Actually I did that years ago. I basically have a CCTV in each room with a sign that says "this premise is being recorded".

It has saved my ass three times now.

[–]SHOW_ME_YOUR_INBOX 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It's rather sad that you have had to use that for three different situations to get yourself out of trouble. What a depressing world we live in.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well I was arrested all three times still sadly but in the end it worked out for me and purely because of the video AND audio; had it not been for that I would have been in jail. Saved me two assault of family member convictions and one sexual assault conviction. I tell men nowadays "Look even if you married, etc if you have ANY FEMALE that lives with you even your own kid you need to record all the time"

[–]SHOW_ME_YOUR_INBOX 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well I'm glad things worked out for you! Interesting advice, I suppose I'm lucky I haven't had to deal with anything like this.

[–]letsgetfunkymonkey 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The author repeatedly uses various versions of the phrase "sex you don't particularly want". That has nothing to do with rape or consent.

Sex with someone who doesn't want that sex isn't rape, or even morally wrong. Sex with someone who doesn't consent to sex is rape (and wrong). Having sex with someone who doesn't consent is on the rapist. But CONSENTING TO SEX THAT YOU DON'T PARTICULARLY WANT IS ON YOU!. That isn't your partner's fault, that's YOUR fault. If you don't particularly want sex, don't freaking consent to it!

And once you have consented to it, recognize that the subsequent feelings stem from regret and anxiety, not because you were any sort of a victim. It is the exact same feeling a guy has when he bangs a fat chick on after a drunken night. It's regret and anxiety over people knowing you banged a fat chick. She didn't fucking rape you or do anything wrong.

[–]fengpi 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

CONSENTING TO SEX THAT YOU DON'T PARTICULARLY WANT IS ON YOU!.

No, no, it's patriarchy which implanted the compulsion to 1. give consent and the compulsion to 2. not want to give consent. Her head was completely empty before the patriarchy made her do everything.

[–]fengpi 30 points31 points32 points 8 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link

There’s a scene from a sixth season episode of the FX sitcom It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia where Dennis Reynolds—a pretty-boy sociopath with a cavalier attitude toward women—launches into a description of a seduction technique he refers to as “the implication.”

Whoah, slow down there cow-girl! Is Dennis a sociopath or is he a completely normal man doing completely normal man-things that any other man would do? I confuse! Are men 99% sociopaths?

[–]PrivateBill 36 points37 points38 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I think that's the implication.

[–]fengpi 15 points16 points17 points 8 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Then deviance really has no meaning if she is declaring it to be a social norm.

Or, you know, maybe men generally drive women out into the middle of the ocean and intimate that they'll dump her overboard if she doesn't put-out. That age-old trick. I did that five times yesterday.

[–]letsgetfunkymonkey 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You ever try coming out of the bathroom with your pants down and acting like you didn't know anyone else was there? That works sometimes too.

[–]fengpi 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't call it a bathroom, though. I call it a rape-room. The living room, I call rape-room II.

Kitchen? Rape-room with a fridge.

[–]Zebedee314 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Because of the implication.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 12 points13 points14 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

All men are sociopathic rapists.

Because Patriarchy.

Also feminism is totally supportive of men!

[–]HeForeverBleeds 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

it was really ironic for her to bring that up considering the female character, Dee, had one of her own

[–]kurisu7885 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I've seen some insist that most men are rapists, pedophiles ,racists, sexists... just about anything negative.

[–]Warod0 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No means no. Yes also means no sometimes. Most of the time Yes means yes but sometimes I say no in a manner that means i say yes.

God why can't you understand its so simple.

[–]mariox19 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This has been documented:

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/pop-psych/201408/just-say-no-and-be-sure-mean-it

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I must be getting old. Used to be if you were a floozy and promiscuous it was all your own fault ffs!

[–]HappyHound 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I give it less than two years before a woman makes the same or similar enough stringent regarding drunk driving and gets acquitted.

[–]heisenberg747 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thanks for not linking the actual site.

[–]Lrellok 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

in settings both professional and personal, I am often afraid that my boundaries will not be respected, that I will be expected, once again, to comply with someone else’s desires rather than my own.

I work as a class A truckdriver. The reason we now have PAGES of legislation regarding how lon truckers can drive, how may hours of sleep they have to have, what condition the equipment has to be in, is this right here. Men have had to deal with this situation in work, home, life for generations, but the instant one single female realizes this is going on, OH MY GOD ITS A CRISIS!

I am going to say something very radical here. The reason men do not respect your bodily autonomy is that MENS bodily autonomy is NEVER respected. We have no more obligation to extend to you something you are completely and totally willing to extend to us.

And to those reading this comment cynically, no i am not advocating rape. I am saying YOU must start respecting the bodily autonomy of others as much as you expect them to recognize yours.

Lets take an example from the article itself.

A few years ago, in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy, I met up with a boy from Philly at a fancy doughnut shop in Chelsea.

I am going to assume that Chelsea is somewhere in new york and not in boston. Philly to New York is 100 miles, 2 hours drive on a good day (which are few). My company would have to pay me $50 to make that run, and $50 for the run back. In addition, assuming there was a movie and some dinner involved here, my company would have to pay me $15 an hour for sitting around waiting for some one else to finish what they where doing. That comes to about $150 for the drive and the detention. SO, why did you not pay him $150 for his time?

Because you could care less about his bodily autonomy, that's why.

[–]Ninjetik 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

"...and we teach men that they can get away with violating women" Thanks for all the insightful sourcing; seriously, once the author used the phrase 'sexual micro-aggressions', I checked out.

[–]publicbigguns 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That was in the last paragraph. You didn't miss much though.

[–]ansonslady 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It is ridiculous for any individual, man or women, to put blame on someone else for a decision that they have made. Women often do this as a way to not have to look at themselves as something they don't want to see and society now doesn't force it on women like it does men. We are placated to. When we don't look at ourselves self improvement never happens and emotional growth is stunted.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

My favorite part of it is

“sexual microaggressions”

These women are so out of touch with themselves its absurd. 95% of the western single female population dress themselves up and try wait'n'bait “sexual microaggressions” on the regular in what is practically a genetically encoded mating ritual at this point.

If it weren't for “sexual microaggressions” the population would probably shrivel up in die in a culture of obesity and self hatred within a generation. Although I'm not surprised because the writer of this garbage is probably a globalist fuckwit or the pawn of one.

Deliberate attempt to create dissonance among the genders and confuse the shit out of young idiots.

[–]Fly_U2_the_sunset 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Totally agree with the first sentence. Not the 95% part. Maybe 30%?

[–]boringcarpets 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

If anything it seems it's a problem with women who perceive rape

[–]Drekalo 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

In that many of them perceive 'everything' as rape?

[–]boringcarpets 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes

[–]Proteus_Marius 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Your post title seemed likely to be over the top on first glance. It wasn't.

[–]EricAllonde[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thanks.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I absolutely have NOT been conditioned to put a man's needs before mine. In fact, in my experience it's been the exact opposite. I've been inundated since pre-pubescence that my body is my own and no means no. I've told my boyfriend no when I don't feel like sex and he has ALWAYS respected that boundary because he (along with 96% of the human population) in not a sociopath. They key is saying "No". How do so many other women not get that? Men can't read minds sweetheart. And yes, I've consented to sex on a few occasions when I didn't particularly want to for the sole reason that I love my boyfriend and I get a lot of enjoyment from watching him cum even when I don't get any sexual fulfillment out of it, and knowing that I can do that for him. He does it for me too.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"I didn't want to sleep with the guy, but I got piss drunk and let him have his way with me"

No, that's not rape.

[–]mariox19 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is a perfect illustration of why college campuses need to refer rape allegations to the police, rather than adjudicating all such claims in kangaroo courts using testimony given by neurotics. What is discussed in this essay is wrong on so many levels, but not in any way the author imagines.

Just think, you tell a woman that you just met for a first date that you drove too long a way to not get a blowjob, and her reaction is that it would just be easier to get drunk and let you have your way with her—and somehow that's the fault of The Patriarchy.

[–]josiasx 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (27 children) | Copy Link

“My body language was telegraphing pain/discomfort/disinterest, since I stopped showing enthusiasm or reciprocation,” Anna says. But her partner didn’t seem to notice or particularly care

You know, this article really is something that should be supported by MRAs.

And this,

If I say no, someone getting upset, acting hurt, being disappointed, and asking again can easily make me say yes”—a personality quirk that both male and female partners have used against her

While the focus of the article was on male semi-aggression against females. It does mention females behave the same.

Really, this is a good article. I'm not sure I can agree 100% with this, but it does give me something to think about.

[–]mully_and_sculder 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago (24 children) | Copy Link

The fact remains if the worst of your issues involve consenting to sex that you didn't much want, you were always perfectly capable of telling the person to fuck off.

[–]chocoboat 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I strongly believe that sex ed classes should be changed so that an entire chapter of the class is dedicated to clear communication. People (girls especially) need to be taught to say "no" if that's what they want. They should be taught to be ready for a situation where your partner wants to go too far before you're ready, how it might be a natural reaction to freeze up and not know how to react... and that as soon as you feel this happening you need to start speaking, and say "no, I don't want to do this, I'm not ready for this". Maybe even make a game out of it in class where the students can practice saying no to things.

There wouldn't be all of this mess with mixed signals, women later regretting sex, men mistakenly thinking the women wanted it, etc. if everyone learned to communicate clearly and say no when they mean no. No dropping hints and expecting your partner to interpret your body language... use words.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I have an experience that perfectly coincides with this. In the early days of my relationship with my boyfriend, probably only the third or fourth time I'd ever had sex in my life, things got hot and heavy a little too quickly for my comfort and he grabbed me and pushed me down on the bed and I blurted out "No", exactly as I've been taught to my whole life, because I was uncomfortable. He stopped that very second, totally understanding and apologetic. I understood that he just got carried away and my own inexperience was as much to blame as his enthusiasm. Three years later I'm much more confident and I actually enjoy when he handles me roughly. I think the problem is that girls just expect guys to KNOW they're not into it, and assume that if he keeps going, he's deliberately violating them. Edit to add: Just to recap, I totally agree with you. There needs to be more focus on teaching girls the line between saying "no" and just thinking "no". Cause that seems to be a major problem.

[–]Aivias 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

From what Ive learnt of the dating and sex culture is that its taboo to be overt with women.

They are causing a lot of these issues becuase they cannot be honest about their intentions. They have to 'test' us to see if we're 'worthy', see what lengths we are willing to go to to prove ourselves and that almost no woman would agree to sleeping with the average guy if he just went up and asked if they wanted to.

It exactly the cause of mens sexual aggression where some men who wouldnt ever dream of sexually assaulting a woman never mind raping one get labeled creeps or perverts because countless things have told him that he should never take that first 'no' as an answer because who the fuck can tell if its a coy no with the expectation that if you prove your worth it will turn into a 'yes'.

[–]Ooshkii 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

The specific point made here concerns the psychological pressure applied to turn a maybe or "i dont know" into a yes. I get it too, because the article mostly concerns manipulation based on social norms and the normalization of the idea that sex is given in exchange for something. I have a hard time criticizing these observations when I myself also hate that norm. Maybe the article is unfairly targeted solely at men, but the author is clearly writing from the perspective of a hetero woman. Furthermore, she is clearly not calling this rape, but something somewhat similar.

[–]letsgetfunkymonkey 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

she is clearly not calling this rape, but something somewhat similar.

We don't need to find a word for it. We already have a word for it. It isn't anything similar to rape. The word you're looking for is regret.

[–]Ooshkii -5 points-4 points-3 points 8 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

No, the words I am looking for are social pressure and emotional manipulation... but nice try though.

[–]bufedad 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

No, the words I am looking for are social pressure and emotional manipulation... but nice try though.

The word your missing is responsibility, as in responsible for your own decisions.

[–]Ooshkii 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

There is a bunch of nuance that you are throwing out the window here and we have, at least in most of western philosophy/jurisprudence, recognized that responsibility can have mitigating factors.

[–]bufedad 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Nuance? You are responsible for your choices and your actions. Period. No one else is responsible for your choices. Women aren't children.

[–]Ooshkii 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You seem to have not read my comment. Responsibility for one's actions always has mitigating factors based on bias in the system. The issue here is not responsibility, but rather attempting to remove bias in the system that is unduly pushing decisions. If that is not what you are talking about, then you are not addressing my posts or the article in an honest manner.

[–]bufedad 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

No it doesn't. You don't get to blame other people for your choices. Period.

[–]letsgetfunkymonkey 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

When you make decisions that you don't want to make because of social pressure and emotional manipulation, they result in regret. The solution is to (a) live with regret or (b) don't make decisions you don't want to because of social pressure and emotional manipulation.

In other words, the problem is with the person making the regrettable decision, not with society or emotional manipulation. The solution is to learn to make better decisions. And that applies whether you're buying a car, choosing how much to drink, deciding on a college major or deciding whether to have sex with someone. Because in all of those cases, if you make a decision that someone else (or society) tries to talk you into, rather than making the decision that you actually want to make for yourself, there's a high likelihood you're going to be living with regret.

[–]Ooshkii 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And there is certainly an argument that rings true here. However I do think that we cannot ignore when someone says that they feel unduly pressured to make a decision that they do not like. We can recognize that people have responsibility for their actions while still working to better remove biasing factors in their decisions.

To pose an example, consider this: You find a beautiful (insert body type here) person on some dating site and you chat them up. They live a few hours away and drive up specifically to meet you based on a mutual agreement. During the date they express a desire to engage in a physical relationship. If you are a meek person, you might feel pressured by all of the extra work the other person has put in and accede to their wishes regardless of your feelings. That is the point. Maybe we as a society should look at this behavior and possibly discourage it.

Anyways, isn't one of the parts of the MRA platform to separate sex from the emotional exchange of a relationship. If we consider sex a commodity to be bought/sold in a relationship then it also creates situations where people get hurt. One of the most common complaints I hear on relationships on this sub regards people expecting men to always be "buying" sex in these exchanges.

[–]Aivias 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

social pressure and emotional manipulation

Then women need to be much more open about what their role in the dating market place is intended to be.

Hardly anyone would ever get laid if they listened to the 'be nice' bullshit, you wont get laid much by just saying "I would like to have sexual relations with you, do you consent?" to someone youre interested in, and when at the very least half of them expect you to be persistent and prove why they should let you have sex with them so how does one tread the razor-thin line between persistent when its expected of you and manipulation?

[–]Ted8367 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

she is clearly not calling this rape, but

Give it time

[–]Ooshkii -3 points-2 points-1 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

That is both unfair and uncharitable. If you somehow have secret evidence about her thoughts, feel free to share. Otherwise you are making shit up.

[–]DarthCerebroX 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's not that he's psychic and knows her thoughts ... he's just basing his prediction on the countless amount of cases where a woman had consensual sex... and then weeks, months, or even years later... after joining a rape advocacy group or feminists group, her friends convince her that the sex was actually rape.

So then she goes and files a rape claim and that man that had probably forgotten about that one night of uneventful sex years ago... suddenly his life is being destroyed and he's being accused of being some kind of horrible monster.

All because some feminist girl wanting attention, or sympathy , or social status among her activist friends... all because she decided months/years later that the consent she gave... somehow didn't count.

Look... I agree with some of your original comment. If a woman is clearly in pain or clearly not into it, the "right thing" to do would be for the guy to ask her if she wants to stop or ask her if she's okay. But at the same time, the woman also has a responsibility to voice her own thought and wants. If she is in pain or decides she's not feeling it anymore... then she should open her damn mouth and say so. It's really not that hard to say "No" or "stop" ...

But the problem is.. these feminists like the author come up with all these bullshit reasons to take agency and responsibility away from the women and put it directly on the men. That's bullshit!

Most men.. I'd say probably like 90% of men are just normal, compassionate people. I know there's only been a couple times where it seemed like a woman was feeling pain or not into in when we had sex, and she wasn't saying anything (for whatever reason) so I stopped and asked her straight up if she was okay. And when she didn't give me a straight answer (probably out of embarrassment) I just went ahead and stopped on my own.

I think most guys would do the same in those situations. And even if a guy was clueless and didn't recognize her discomfort... I guarantee if the woman spoke up and said to stop or that she was hurting, 90% of guys out there would stop. Because unlike what feminists try to paint us out to be... most guys are decent human beings that have empathy and compassion for other people.

The only guys that wouldn't stop are your stereotypical D-bag asshole pieces of shit... but you know what, that's not our fault! The other 95% of men shouldn't be held accountable for the actions of a tiny minority of men.

And let me go one step further.. because these women want to act like ALL men need to be taught these things simply because the actions of the few... let me throw out a suggestion that might be unpopular or controversial...

Before I say it.. I first have to clarify that in those situations, if a girl does actually voice her concerns and say to stop .. but the man doesn't stop, that's not her fault. She did her job and the man should have respected her wishes.

But it pisses me off that these women want to act like it's all men doing this... so let me just say this...

The only reason they think/act like this is such a huge problem among the male population (instead of understanding it's a small percentage)... the only reason is because these women constantly go after these D-bag asshole guys... they constantly chase the most alpha, macho men pieces of shit that never respect anybody's boundaries and are constantly treating people like shit. This happens a lot especially when they are younger. They want to chase and go after all the bad boys who exhibit alpha masculine traits... all the guys that act like they're the top dog and go around treating women and men like shit and never respecting boundaries. And then they want to turn around and act surprised when those assholes don't respect their boundaries and end up treating them like shit.

And again.. I'm not trying to victim blame... if a woman says stop or verbally withdrawals consent, but if the man doesn't stop, he should be punished for it. But the problem is when this happens, instead of recognizing that it happened because the guy was a total piece of shit... (which would mean she'd have to acknowledge that she chose that piece of shit) ... she wants to act like it's a widespread problem among all men. And I'm sorry but that's bullshit and it infuriates me to no end .

[–]Ooshkii 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

All because some feminist girl wanting attention, or sympathy , or social status among her activist friends... all because she decided months/years later that the consent she gave... somehow didn't count.

~DarthCerebroX

I have to disagree based on her own words:

But missing from this dichotomy are the scores of “not rape” violations, and acts that might best be described as “sexual microaggressions”—small acts of boundary-pushing and coercion that might be easy enough to brush off in isolation, but in aggregate teach women that their bodily autonomy is revocable, and that violations of their boundaries and sense of safety aren’t just tolerable, but utterly and completely normal.

While writing this story, I heard from a number of different women who’d had sexual experiences that weren’t quite rape, but didn’t feel completely consensual either. One woman told me about having the flu and still being pressured into sex by her boyfriend, an encounter that left her with “a low level distaste for sex for a few years after”—right up until she started to learn about the concept of “dubious consent” and came to terms with what she’d been through.

~Lux

She is very clearly not calling this rape, explicitly so. She is attempting to define out a space where coercive practices are used to push someone's "yes" when without those practices they would have been a "no". You can call it many things, but this is clearly not an attempt to retroactively revoke consent and claim rape. And to this end, I do agree with her that we need to recognize and discourage coercive practices in relationships. While this article focuses exclusively on women, I have seen many stories on this sub of men being bullied into sex... usually based on socially accepted stereotypes regarding the male libido. I find it unfortunate that there is that exclusivity in the article, but I would rather use this as an opportunity to reach out a hand and say, "yeah, that happens to us too, lets work on it together instead of making this a gendered issue."

[–]fengpi 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That is both unfair and uncharitable.

God forbid that somebody assault my fragile ears with their disquieting cynicism.

[–]Ooshkii 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

God forbid you attempt to add to the conversation in a substantive way.

[–]mully_and_sculder 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Male or female we all do things to please our family, parents, friends that we might not otherwise do because of societal pressure. From the mundane to the really important like getting married or moving cities. Each and every time we have agency in choosing whether we do it or not and whatever we do the ultimate responsibility rests with us alone.

[–]Rumpadunk 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If I say no, someone getting upset, acting hurt, being disappointed, and asking again can easily make me say yes

This is true for things that aren't sex. And ultimately, you are the one who chooses what you do. I don't see why it should be treated differently.

Hell, it's like if you say no to a car salesman but then they ask again with a lower price, or giving your dog a treat once they give you puppy eyes, or playing basketball with your friends after they go "cmoooon", etc. etc. Either

  • The deal has changed. Like car salesman example, similar to "If you let me do anal I'll go down on you twice" or "I'll make it quick" or similar

  • How much it means to them matters to you. Like playing basketball with friends or giving your dog a treat, similar to saying "you know I came all this way" or "I'm DYING over here it's been a week!"

  • Repayment. If I played wiffleball with my brother a lot recently, and the next day he asks if I wanna play basketball and I so no but then he pulls "bruh but I played so much wiffleball with you cmon" then I probably will play basketball for at least a little bit. So this would be similar to "I gave you oral twice earlier can't you give me some?"

Those are 3 big ones that come to mind, and I don't see any issue with using them.

[–]josiasx -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But not all people, put the same value on sex that you do.

It not like a car, if it doesn't bring you home, you can't return it.

Its not like friendly game of basketball with your buddies. The reputation points are much higher.

Which is part of the problem. You (not you,) are on 2 different wave lengths. But you badger her into it anyway. Are you really a sex dynamo? Or are you a lowly beggar?

But the point that this strong, independent, educated, journalist, can't walk away from unwanted sex. So much so that that is the story of her sex life, Is something that is worth meditating on.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not entirely taking her side. I'm just pointing out that she does have a point.

[–]omegaphallic 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow, just wow, this makes me feel sad, I just pity her for having such a disempowering perpective.

[–]magicalraven 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

dubious consent

Take note of this term as I have a feeling its about to take off in the SJW world

[–]heimdahl81 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Whenever something like this comes up, I mention two quick experiences with women from the past.

My first girlfriend wanted to wait until after marriage for sex. Still, we would make out, get excited, and beg me to fuck her in the heat of the moment. I always refused. I told her she would have to ask me to have sex with a clear head. Eventually we did and it was fine. No regrets by either party.

Another young woman was a friend I was flirty with. She laid down in my bed for a nap and I joined her. She snuggled up to me in a spooning position. She said to me "Whatever you do, don't bite the back of my neck." I replied "Like this?" and then bit her neck. That got this started and we fooled around for the first time. We dated for several years after that.

In the first case I had enthusiastic consent, but it would have been a shitty move to go along with it, though not illegal. In the second case, I was explicitly denied consent for what I did, but I did it anyway because I knew it was something we both wanted. In the real world, stuff like religious beliefs, social pressure, intoxication, mental state, and other things all affect the decision to have sex or not to. The real world can't be simplified into a yes or no answer.

[–]Jammersault 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When a woman experiences regret it's a major affront to her dignity. It's very very very serious, it cuts soooooo very very deeply. And someone needs to be held responsible, somebody other than her. Of course there isn't a man on the planet that hasn't had to chew the arm off and back door it and live with the regret of a consensual night of debauchery with the last fatty at the local. But of the responsibility for a blokes' regret was to fall at the feet of someone other than the bloke himself it would be fat unattractive women, and their crime would be being so desperate and easy to have sex with. Of course the lefties would attack this logic as bigoted and discriminatory.........oh the irony !

[–]SJW_Skeptic 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Seems the article divides rape incorrectly it is "R" rape and unsatisfying voluntary sex that I later define as rape without a thought of the consequences to the poor Schmuck that failed to measure up to the standards of today's romance novels and women's magazines.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A common trope in feminism is this:

I feel this way. That's the patriarchy's fault and my own views on issues are evidence of my oppression.

Anyway, I know that sex under duress, even if it's not forced, is rape. A friend of mine was on a date with a guy who picked her up. After going to a restaurant, they got back in his car and he suddenly drove her to his cabin on the outskirts of town, ignoring her protests. He asked if she wanted sex, and she refused. He then said that she didn't have to, but he wouldn't drive her home until they banged. She had no cell phone reception due to the location, and it was the middle of a snowy winter where it would have been impossible to walk home through the middle of an unknown area.

I think this is a clear-cut case of duress. But when you have examples like the one written in the article ("I felt uncomfortable because he drove a long way to see me"), it's just stupid.

[–]Aivias 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Soon bad sex will be rape.

[–]someguymartin -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

No one is going to go to jail for putting ice against their girlfriend’s vulva or for badgering someone into sex they don’t particularly want, or for not using a condom with someone who’s otherwise consented to sex. But the fact that these aren’t criminal acts doesn’t mean that they’re not violating or traumatic or wrong. 

The author is not advocating to put you all in jail. They're trying to show you perspective, in the hope that the next time a girl says no to you. That it is a resounding no.

Ill probably get down voted in this retarded echo chamber, but remember boys, if she says no, that's where it should stop. Regardless of what other motives are behind that no, (playing hard to get, secret rape fantasy, etc)

[–]letsgetfunkymonkey 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

We all know that consent can be withdrawn at any time, so any "yes" expires as soon as a "no" is uttered. But am I to understand that the reverse is not true? A "no" never expires?

But the fact that these aren’t criminal acts doesn’t mean that they’re not violating or traumatic or wrong. 

Yes. When you do something you regret it can be traumatic. If you buy a car that's too expensive, or choose a college because your boyfriend goes there and then breaks up with you, or make a fool of yourself by having to much to drink at the company picnic, or consent to sex that you don't really want; you're going to have feelings of regret and anxiety and that could be interpreted as being "traumatic".

But the lesson should be learn to make better decisions for yourself! What the author (and perhaps you) is trying to do is put that blame on someone who is blameless. She thinks the lesson should be don't sell a car to someone who can't afford it, or don't breakup with your girlfriend after she chooses college for you, or don't serve alcohol at your company picnic, or don't have consensual sex unless you're able to read your partner's mind and know they want it.

[–]bufedad 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The author is not advocating to put you all in jail.

No, she's declaring consensual sex as rape because she feels regret after the fact.

They're trying to show you perspective,

Yes, the perspective that if she makes the mistake of consenting to something she doesn't want to, that's also your fault and you are also raping her.

in the hope that the next time a girl says no to you.

She never said no. Everyone knows "no means no". She's saying yes also means no.

That it is a resounding no.

This article doesn't talk about non-consent in any way whatsoever.

if she says no, that's where it should stop.

You didn't read the article. The article says that if she says yes, and consents, it can still be rape if she regrets it.

[–]Vandechoz 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ill probably get down voted in this retarded echo chamber

I mean, I'd downvote just for this line, but the main reason is because you completely missed her point. It had nothing to do with the word "no".

[–]cud_chewin 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I also thought that there was something of value in the article. I'm not sure what to make of it though. I think that the author's experiences are valid and worthy of respect. I don't think that she is lying about the hurt that's been caused by the events she describes. However it's also true that plenty of women will initially say "no" and then later say "yes" without later regretting it. Sometimes because she simply changes her mind, others because she was willing all along but didn't want to seem easy.

Many men know this, and see it play out in their lives. So while I think it's worthwhile to try to educate men to accept a "no" and leave it at that, I'm not sure it's realistic to expect all men to walk away when they know there's a likelihood that persistence will lead to sex.

So while educating men is a good idea, how about the other side of it? How about we also educate women to be more direct and honest about their desires? To never say "no" when they mean "yes", and thereby implicitly teach men not to accept an initial "no"? Well I say go ahead and float the idea that we need to educate women not to play games, that they are in part responsible for these types of situations. Be prepared for the shitstorm that will follow. We can advocate educating men about their part in all this, but try to get women to accept some share of the responsibility and you are a monster.

[–]fengpi 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

how about the other side of it?

You misogynist. You haven't learned that women are but passive and unthinking autumn leaves who float, sink and twist in a patriarchal tornado. Women are but the playthings of men's unseen machinations! Balloon-headed dolts who need to be kept in cages and fed alfalfa pellets through the bars until a strong manly adult can lead them around on a leash. Or so the doctrine insists.

[–]salululations 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you think getting down-voted is the sign of an echo-chamber that's pretty good. The real echo chambers just delete dissenting opinions.

[–]fengpi 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

They're trying to show you perspective, in the hope that the next time a girl says no to you. That it is a resounding no.

The author is saying that "yes" can mean "no" sometimes if she later on feels that it actually meant "no." I know the perspective, it is the perspective of an idiotic flaky woman who blames her partners for giving her less-than-enjoyable sexual escapades that she later feels bad about.

Also, by the author's standards, I've been raped by a number of women. So where are the condescending "consent" lectures for them? Perhaps a remedial course in the importance of respecting men's bodies and exhortations to fight "female entitlement" in addition to a refresher lecture on the ontological differences between "yes" and "no" rather than a puerile regret-based charade of rationalization where "yes" is "no" after Suzy Hungoverchick wakes-up and decides that her fling looks too much like Steve Urkel and maybe she didn't want to stuff his cock inside her after all, now that she has time to reflect upon it.

[–]Aivias 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That it is a resounding no.

And what if its not actually a no, but one of those nos where the expectation is to continue to prove your worth?

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter