Jezebel's list of worst people of 2010 only includes men. What about Christine O'Donnell, who was against abortion, even in cases of rape? Nope. Julian Assange is worse!

grandsonofgranddad · 2011-01-03T06:42:12+00:00

Jezebel is written for and by crazy harpies and spinsters.

perspextive · 2011-01-03T08:14:42+00:00

More importantly: what the fuck is Jezebel and why does anyone actually care what they think?

njm1314 · 2011-01-03T05:27:52+00:00

Jezebel is the Andrea Dworkin of feminist websites.

Of course it is going to be extremely misandrist and anti-male. That's how they pander to their readers.

Complaining about Jezebel being hateful is like complaining about too much partial nudity on 4chan.

Quazz · 2011-01-03T05:03:58+00:00

To be fair, it does say worst dudes....

However, the list is crap.

They list people who were offensive to some women... But they leave out those that cost thousands upon thousands of lives.

Redsox933 · 2011-01-03T14:40:27+00:00

The caption of this post is totally misleading. The name of the list is the worst dudes not people, and Julian Assange is 8th not 1st.

stemgang · 2011-01-03T06:32:48+00:00

Man-hating doesn't get clearer than this.

Infammo · 2011-01-03T05:16:43+00:00

Assange is on there? I thought it was common knowledge even amongst feminist bloggers that he didn't rape anyone.

Ma99ie · 2011-01-03T05:20:54+00:00

Vapid.

jaxspider · 2011-01-03T05:38:15+00:00

[permanently deleted]

erebar · 2011-01-03T07:41:16+00:00

Jezebel's list of worst people of 2010 only includes men.

Uh, nope. Their list of the worst "dudes" of 2010 only includes ... well, dudes.

That is beside the point however. How is this site not being stormed with outrage over Julian Assange's inclusion on a list with perverts and abusers? The summary is entirely shallow, and it only briefly mentions a sex case that is widely thought of as complete and utter erroneous nonsense anyway. This site is just deplorable, and I sincerely hope I never meet the disgusting women who frequent it.

banksnld · 2011-01-03T13:59:36+00:00

The title of the article is "What's Next For 2010's Worst Dudes?" Nice job failing reading comprehension, OP.

YHWH_The_Lord · 2011-01-03T12:59:21+00:00

Why do any of you give a shit what these retarded cunts say?

GimmeSomeSugar · 2011-01-03T15:09:16+00:00

And if he isn't already haunting your dreams, these photos of his Christmas activities may help.

Oh God, what heinous shit have they caught Julian in the middle of? 'Le click' - Ah, I see. His heinous activities involve him hanging around his house, chilling at Christmas...

Ah FFS, they also do that thing where they inject 'Read more...' URLs into your copy to paste.

2011-01-03T17:15:48+00:00

Hey sporrow, unless you don't know what dudes means, you're stupid and your link text is stupid too. "What's next for 2010's Worst Dudes?"

baconforlife · 2011-01-03T13:18:38+00:00

Jesse James? JESSE JAMES?!

Ebayman · 2011-01-03T05:47:08+00:00

Jezebel is the fertile soil from which misogyny blooms....

volition87 · 2011-01-03T05:49:32+00:00

This is coming from the Network of Gizmodo, Lifehacker, Kotaku and Gawker. How can they affiliate with this hate mongering?

nised · 2011-01-03T04:52:10+00:00

wow! and that's coming from one of the worst women of all time. the irony.

houndofmorrgan · 2011-01-03T15:59:39+00:00

I find that, lets call them "female turn-coats" are far more offensive than men. I agree with OP that Christine O'Donnell and Sharron Angle are far worse than Assange. Besides the whole Assange thing is so confusing I don't think he actually did anything wrong.

MrJ1NX · 2011-01-03T16:00:50+00:00

I knew I shouldn't click. Damnit. Rage.

2011-01-03T17:01:34+00:00

The list is crap but it does say "Worst dudes of 2010" so, like, you know, chill out. And I don't think I'd even call Jezebel a feminist website.

NiceGuysSTFU · 2011-01-03T10:55:49+00:00

It would be odd for a female to make an appearance on a "worst dudes" list.

TwwIX · 2011-01-03T08:34:12+00:00

Jezewho?

ZenaLundgren · 2011-01-03T18:25:27+00:00

You do realize that implying "Jezebel = feminist website" is the same as implying "Maxum = Mensrights magazine". Right?

2011-01-03T08:57:50+00:00

Wow, I get curious how Julian Assange gets treated in the comments, and in two comments I come across "mansplaining". That managed to be worse than I expected.

perspextive · 2011-01-03T08:14:12+00:00

More importantly: who the fuck is Jezebel and why does anyone actually care what they think?

theta71 · 2011-01-03T14:55:24+00:00

who cares what Jezebel thinks!

executex · 2011-01-03T15:18:48+00:00

I am not going to upvote something that links to such a site directly. Call me when it's an imgur.

2011-01-03T17:01:12+00:00

Jezebel should makes its own Top 10 Worst List every single year. A bunch of catty shitwads..

2011-01-03T17:08:02+00:00

Jezebel is garbage they try to write things to piss people off in hope of views. Then , any comments they distort or remove if you don't follow along

Block it in your hosts file, its the only way to be sure to not accidentally ever give them a page hit

2011-01-03T19:39:34+00:00

I wanted to downvote this post so bad but I realize I'd be smiting in the wrong direction.

numb3rb0y · 2011-01-03T21:01:17+00:00

All the people bitching about the fact that this is in fact a list of worst "dudes" really ought to consider whether Jezebel would ever in a million years post a list of worst "gals".

Compiling a list of people who're bad in a sexism manner that intentionally excludes women can't be excused by making the title gender-exclusive at the last minute.

2011-01-04T00:02:12+00:00

Hmmm. Interesting that the nutjob that murdered the twelve year old with a blow torch didn't make the list.

I guess having a vagina makes that acceptable.

Airazz · 2011-01-04T00:30:03+00:00

Assagne was never accused of rape, anywhere.

2011-01-04T00:53:53+00:00

Evidently the best man is worse than the worst women.

kill_terrorist_pigs · 2011-01-03T12:07:46+00:00

After all he is a rapist ...

BalzacOfTheTubes · 2011-01-03T10:08:09+00:00

The feminists have realized that something has gone wrong, and their best laid plans keep failing.

The girls at Jezebel.com are finally starting to wake up and smell the coffee, and they don't like it at all.

The case against Polanski was 30 years old. Also, Samantha Geimer didn't want him to be extradited. Most importantly, we're not going to have Interpol warrants plucking American citizens off the streets of American cities after breaking a condom on a European vacation. That would have been the end result of a reciprocal extradition arrangement between the USA and EU, with a precedent being set by the Polanski case.

A big part of the Male Rights agenda has to be reforming legal terminology of sex offenses to acknowledge distinctions between male and female, straight and LGBT, "hebephilia" and pedophilia.

Additionally, the euphemism "statutory rape" should not be used to describe voluntary sex with adolescent minors. It should be called something else if it was not rape. Heterosexual vs homosexual offenses should always be noted by the legal language of whatever charges are filed. The term "minor" should only describe teens in order to avoid lumping adult/teen sex offenders with adult/preteens sex offenders.

Making these distinctions would save a lot of basically normal men the suffering of being lumped together with some of the most undesirable men in society.

The feminists are going to oppose this 100% because they're effectively a "sexual union" who seeks to elevate sexual demand for themselves, as women by causing scarcity of sexual availability for all men.

Sabotaging justice with gender-neutral terminology hobbles normal men and thereby serves the greater goal of the sex union, increasing demand.

This legal sabotage must be resisted so that we're not subject to feminist totalitarianism. Let the real perverts face real justice, and let normal men enjoy their lives. Who knows, maybe we'll want to be with women our own age rather than teenage girls.

It depends on whether women act less mature as they progress from teen years to adult years, or whether they can maintain at least as much common sense as they had when they were teenager.

Currently, it seems female emotional maturity takes a dive after year 16 and reaches its nadir around 30, especially if they don't find a stable relationship by then.

serenader · 2011-01-03T19:08:58+00:00

The only thing I care for in a Pussy mag is Pussy only.

endo · 2011-01-03T17:59:30+00:00

Ahahaha, surprise! Women have retarded "opinions", it's actually pretty endearing that they think they know anything about anything. They should get back in the kitchen and shut the fuck up, make me dinner and then suck me off, they literally have no other purpose in life. Whoever gave women rights fucked the entire world, good job you limp wristed faggots.

Comments