TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Is It O.K. to Press Your Spouse to Have a Vasectomy Before You Ditch Him? (Published 2018) | Woman pushes husband for a vasectomy while secretly planning to divorce him afterwards. Plot twist: she works for "an organization dedicated to reproductive choice and plans to work as a counselor"

EricAllonde

January 13, 2022
1549 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/02/magazine/is-it-ok-to-press-your-spouse-to-have-a-vasectomy-before-you-ditch-him.html
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Is It O.K. to Press Your Spouse to Have a Vasectomy Before You Ditch Him? (Published 2018) | Woman pushes husband for a vasectomy while secretly planning to divorce him afterwards. Plot twist: she works for "an organization dedicated to reproductive choice and plans to work as a counselor"
Author

EricAllonde

Upvotes 1549
Comments 178
Date January 13, 2022 11:02 AM UTC
(4 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/s2wxzt/is_it_ok_to_press_your_spouse_to_have_a_vasectomy/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/is-it-ok-to-press-your-spouse-to-have-a-vasectomy.1096454
https://theredarchive.com/post/1096454
Top posts by EricAllonde

Kathy Griffin whines about her fee for hosting NYE telecast on CNN, tries to claim gender pay gap, is firmly slapped down.

26663 upvotes
January 1, 2019
/r/PussyPassDenied

I'm seeing more and more of this: feminists using "mansplaining" accusations to deal with being publicly proven wrong

11347 upvotes
September 7, 2017
/r/MensRights

Female BBC manager publicly declines promotion over pay inequality | After she threw a public tantrum, it's revealed that the male manager had several years more experience than her, justifying the difference in pay. The BBC is standing firm for once - good for them!

9152 upvotes
May 22, 2019
/r/PussyPassDenied

Who Would Win? Vidcon edition: answered

9072 upvotes
June 29, 2017
/r/PussyPassDenied

College tells construction crew to take down "Men Working" sign deemed 'sexist', even though it was accurate as the crew included zero women | Though women don't want to do dirty, manual labor jobs themselves, they still want to control how men do them

7812 upvotes
January 23, 2017
/r/MensRights

Looks like a great campaign to help tackle male suicide

7265 upvotes
April 24, 2018
/r/MensRights

Imagine the outrage & hysteria if an article like this was written about women: "So thirsty I could drink the pool"

5808 upvotes
August 5, 2016
/r/MensRights

Woman divorced her husband and got $15m. He later listed his company on the stockmarket and earned $93m. You guessed it: she's now suing him for more money...

5662 upvotes
April 5, 2017
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–][deleted] 304 points305 points306 points 4 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

What the hell.

[–]holalesamigos 265 points266 points267 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

bro seriously what the fuck. Forget everything else. This woman took the time and energy to ruin the chances of a man having a child knowing she would leave him. Why even take all that effort and manipulation. Did she hate him so much that she wanted his entire life ruined? WOW

[–]Arqium 99 points100 points101 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I just hope that his EX sue the shit out of her because of it, with tons of proofs as this article.

Of course, only if this all is true, what I doubt it.

[–]holalesamigos 38 points39 points40 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

What she did isn't illegal. In the end, he made the decision to do it. No lawsuit here.

[–]pm_me_pedreiras 133 points134 points135 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I can bet 10 dollars that if he tricked her to sterilize herself, in less than 2 months a law would be enacted for this case.

[–]compmanio36 29 points30 points31 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nah. That only works for women and minorities. White men don't get laws made for them when they're victimized. We're told to "man up" and to "get over it".

[+]holalesamigos -43 points-42 points-41 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Actually no unless the person was mentally ill and couldn't be independent and make decisions for themselves. Even then a person's spouse gets all rights.

So only in very extreme cases.

[–]LokisDawn 30 points31 points32 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

a law would be enacted for this case.

[+]TipiTapi -15 points-14 points-13 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That wouldnt be illegal too.

[–]TipiTapi 19 points20 points21 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Some people are really messed up... i hope she rots in hell what a garbage human being.

And she wants to be a counselor? jesus...

[–][deleted] 44 points45 points46 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I had a so-called friend text a wrong number saying she was pregnant with his kid. The lack of empathy towards men is appalling.

[–]CardMechanic[🍰] 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You must have meant “what a cunt”

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That too.

[–]kai_wulf 21 points22 points23 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Never ever EVER get a vasectomy unless it is 100% your choice.

[–][deleted] 137 points138 points139 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

https://web.archive.org/web/20181002113718/https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/02/magazine/is-it-ok-to-press-your-spouse-to-have-a-vasectomy-before-you-ditch-him.html

[–]PaineintheBurke 19 points20 points21 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thank you.

[–]EricAllonde[S] 343 points344 points345 points 4 years ago (54 children) | Copy Link

Yet another data point confirming that, so far as the large majority of society is concerned, reproductive rights are only for women.

This abuse only generates a tiny fraction of the outrage it would cause if the genders were reversed.

[–]compmanio36 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No clue why men are opting out of society and saying pretty much "Fuck everybody", and society is collapsing in on itself as a result.

This is what they asked for.

[–]RobStonman 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Good. I do the absolute bare minimum to survive. I don't help anyone outside of family and friends. If I see people, especially wahmen struggling I ignore them and let them suffer. Unless there's something in it for me I'm not going to lift a finger. Why should I? I'm enjoying watching the world burn.

[–]EnvironmentalWar4627 71 points72 points73 points 4 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link

What crime would it be if a man convinced a woman to get her tubes tied and then left her?

This is disgusting behaviour but the rights are the same for men and women. It's not illegal to encourage your partner to do something.

Although the article reads like someone telling a story certainly not a real thing. Author seems to know every discussion had in this person's marriage which is...odd.

[–]EricAllonde[S] 112 points113 points114 points 4 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

Legally men have no reproductive rights, while women's reproductive rights are considered sacrosanct.

That situation persists because a majority of people think it's entirely fair & reasonable for men to have no reproductive rights. In fact, if you say that men deserve to have the same right to consent to parenthood that women have, that will make a lot of people very upset and angry. The idea of men also being able to say "no" to parenthood outrages them.

Acts like this, while not illegal, are certainly immoral. And the fact that, only when they are done to men, they cause little outrage, is another measurement of societal attitudes confirming that men will not get reproductive rights any time soon.

[–]red_philosopher 27 points28 points29 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Acts like this, while not illegal, are certainly immoral. And the fact that, only when they are done to men, they cause little outrage, is another measurement of societal attitudes confirming that men will not get reproductive rights any time soon.

That's not entirely accurate. Civil liability for tortious negligence might be possible. If the information she withheld is deemed to be material to his decision, then by withholding that information, she effectively caused irreparable bodily harm to him. That makes her the proximate cause, for which she could easily be found liable. Withholding material information in some cases has been enough for that.

[–]Exterminatus4Lyfe 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Good luck finding a judge that will take a man's side with that

[–]red_philosopher 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Idk, if people can find a woman guilty of manslaughter for telling her suicidal boyfriend to go back into the car to die, then it's possible.

[–]Bike_Of_Doom 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They convicted that girl? I totally forgot about the case, I’m glad to hear that was the outcome because that woman was evil.

[–]RobStonman 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It'll make a lot of people upset and angry🤣😂🤣🤣 Good let them be angry. Sit back and laugh at them.

[+]BeanBodhi -37 points-36 points-35 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

I want to point out yes this is awful but a women can’t get their tubes tied without multiple stipulations put on it where as men can. Which is where the majority of concern for womens reproductive rights comes from. Because women DONT have those rights

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]BeanBodhi -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

What

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]BeanBodhi -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

What????

[–][deleted] 4 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]BeanBodhi 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Do you need help?

[–]DraganTehPro 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Idk man I don't think having sole control of whether of not I want to keep a baby or make the guy pay for it is "having no reproductive rights"

[–]BeanBodhi 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Except they don’t. Not only are people trying to take away abortions but in some places your litteral rapist can stop you.

[+]EnvironmentalWar4627 -55 points-54 points-53 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Acts like this, while not illegal, are certainly immoral. And the fact that, only when they are done to men, they cause little outrage

You would be hard pressed to find someone that thinks this is okay. Not sure what more you want.

[–]compmanio36 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Some actual fucking legal equality, for a start. All the faux outrage in the world counts for nothing when the courts and the microphone holders keep this oppression alive and firmly intact.

[–]ImplodedPotatoSalad 25 points26 points27 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Criminal charges and forced sterilisation for her would be a good start as a punishment from society, tbh.

[–]skellious 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

In some parts of the world there's a slim potential for bringing a civil case as breach of contract but its basically not going to work.

[–]red_philosopher 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Actually, I wouldn't be surprised if a civil lawsuit claiming tortious negligence or battery would succeed. By deliberately withholding information material to his decision, she effectively caused irreparable bodily harm to him. As the proximate cause for his decision, she is culpable.

[–]skellious 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

interesting!

[–]TracyMorganFreeman 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If she had said "get a vasectomy or I'm divorcing you", it would be extortionary abuse.

[–]empatheticapathetic 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They would get done for coercive behaviour because apparently women don’t have agency.

[+]SOwED -9 points-8 points-7 points 4 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

No surprise this post is from you. The article is clearly showing how reprehensible this behavior is. The woman is a sociopath. How can you call it "yet another data point" if the article is completely contradicting what it's supposedly a data point in support of.

You are regularly posting dubious things here and spinning them, and the subreddit is worse for your presence, and the presence of those like you, who are more interested in perpetuating outrage than spreading awareness of real men's issues.

[–]EricAllonde[S] 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

“Men face no issues because these 2 people, out of 340 million, said the right thing. Now shut up and bend the knee to feminism.”

No, I don’t think I will.

[+]SOwED -6 points-5 points-4 points 4 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Strawmanning 101 right here.

I've been here since well before you have, and 9 times out of 10 when I see a post that seems misleading in some way, you're the one who posted it.

[–]EricAllonde[S] 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search/?q=author%3ASOwED

"I've been here longer, yet I haven't posted single thing in the sub in all those years. That's because I don't post anything, I just whine about what other people post all day long."

Thanks, you're definitely helping. I respect your opinion as much as you contribute.

[–]SOwED -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Didn't realize that the only way to participate in a subreddit is to post. Apparently the comments and discussions are nothing?

Also, your posts do not contribute, they are detriments to the subreddit, as I've already described above.

I mean like are you fucking serious my dude? Oh there we go, you finally got it to take off. With a title that ends with "screw them," I really wonder how it is that this sub has become ridiculed as a bunch of angry manchildren.

We all go through the anger phase, but your anger phase seems to be lasting a long time, and it's been poisoning the subreddit. What is it you do that is productive and isn't just rage bait? Really looking forward to you abusing quotation marks and strawmanning me yet again without responding to a single thing I said.

[–]EricAllonde[S] 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

"Like, wow dude. It took you 3 goes to figure out how to post an image in a way that complies with the sub's new rules including a ban on Reddit-hosted images. Like, that totally makes you a misogynist.

Of course, I never have that problem because I never post anything. Instead, I spend my time going back through people's posting history looking for things to whine about. I am very smart."

[–]SOwED -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Wait you actually did it?

I'm somewhat smart, and I'm sure you are too. This isn't a discussion about intelligence. Intelligent people can do the wrong thing, and I think you need to reassess how you're going about this. We have the same goals. I don't believe you're trying to gain in some way from rage bait. I think you actually want to bring attention to men's issues and the double standards we face. But I think you're going about it the wrong way, and you probably know that most people read titles but not articles. Based on that, do you think people could be misled by your post?

[–]EricAllonde[S] 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

If you wanted a reasonable discussion, you opened and continued in entirely the wrong way for that.

[–]SOwED 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Mate, this is the first response where you didn't strawman my position in fake quotes. You want to talk about reasonable discussion? You must be five foot nothing, cause it seems like you've never been the bigger man.

[+]blueyb -6 points-5 points-4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

don't bother arguing with him. his kind of trash and outrage porn is why this sub is a lost cause.

Rest of the sub: Please downvote me while jerking it in outrage. Maybe when you're done, you can play the fucking Sharon Osborne video for the 8 billionth time if you need help finishing your outrage wank.

I much prefer the conversation at leftwingmaleadvocates. Doesn't actually bend a knee to feminism, like menslib does, but is a little lighter on the pointless and often misleading outrage porn like this trash.

[–]SOwED -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thanks for the tip. Yeah, menslib is a bit...idk. Seems more interested in race issues than sexism issue half the time. I'll check out the sub you mentioned.

[+][deleted] -21 points-20 points-19 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

There is a way man can take charge of his reproductive rights: TRT. Testosterone was first invented as a male contraceptive. Its efficacy as a contraceptive is individual specific and there are risks. But, for me, it works. I am very unlikely to have kids at the moment and I will have to undergo a treatment in case I want it in the future. This gives me total control over who I have kids with, which is exactly what I want.

[–]RobStonman 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

It was invented? What? Its part of our DNA. It's not a product that was invented. Are you high?

[–][deleted] -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Are you dumb? I obviously meant exogenous testosterone. Do you know what TRT is?

[–]RobStonman 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No never heard of it.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You should get informed.

[–]EricAllonde[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I've never heard of this either. Are you saying that testosterone supplements induce sterility? Is that temporary or permanent?

Can you link to any further info?

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I am dealing with a bunch morons. You complain about an issue and haven't put the minimum effort to find a solution to it. Just go research about testosterone replacement therapy.

[–]EricAllonde[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Dude, you can just say you don't know anything.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

You just associated testosterone replacement with testosterone supplements. You are not in a position to judge who knows something on this matter. Just use your google and learn before making stupid complaints. For someone that seems so engaged in men's reproductive rights, you should research the alternatives men have into it and also the history on male contraceptive methods.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

For the ones not understanding what I said:

"In the 1980s and 1990s, the World Health Organization (WHO) oversaw trials of testosterone as a contraceptive. " Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-03534-4

https://www.webmd.com/sex/birth-control/news/20090506/testosterone-tested-as-male-contraceptive

[–]DecimatingDarkDeceit 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yet another data point confirming that, so far as the large majority of society is concerned, reproductive rights are only for women.

A new undiscovered shade of dark-pill, in the dosages equivalent to a Tsar Bomb!

[–]Wylanderuk 30 points31 points32 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Two reasons that spring to mind for doing this, to try and fuck up his future relationships and make sure there is less chance of any resources she manages to screw him out of in the divorce can't be reassigned.

Or maybe use the vasectomy against him during custody battles.

So make that 3 possible reasons.

[–]RobStonman 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Why though? What does she care if he wants kids or not? How is it going to matter to her? I don't get it.

[–]Wylanderuk 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

General absolute cuntish behaviours probably.

[+]velvetalocasia -12 points-11 points-10 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

In what way would one use a vasectomy against him in a custody battle?

[–]PM_ME_DNA 24 points25 points26 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That he's not very fatherly because he "doesn't want kids".

[–]Wylanderuk 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah that was my thought as well.

[–]dixieStates 30 points31 points32 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

My ex-wife tried to do that to me. She pushed and pushed but I held my ground. I learned later that she and her mother were secretly plotting to initiate divorce proceedings.

[–]Itrusttheinternett 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

What was the rationale behind their desire for you to get a vasectomy?

[–]dixieStates 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I believe that it was her (or, more likely, he mother's) fucked-up thinking that she would get me sterilized and then divorce.

[–]Itrusttheinternett 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Right, but why?

[–]dixieStates 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Because she is vicious? Maybe it was her way of cutting my balls off.

[–]Itrusttheinternett 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Jesus, what a cunt.

[–]aknabi 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Last message to your FIL should have been “keep your crazy bitches in line” (and made sure the ladies knew about it)

[–]hardcoretuner 44 points45 points46 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No. That's not a good thing to do. Anyone who does this is a horrible person.

[–]Huffers1010 86 points87 points88 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

To be fair the response described it as "appallingly manipulative," which it is, and the person writing in is only doing so because she thinks it's awful too.

Horrendous situation, but the response by the only two people we're actually hearing from is refreshingly appropriate.

[–]Kveld_Ulf 40 points41 points42 points 4 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

The response also ends up being "let it be". So basically this woman forced a guy to rescind good reproductive rights under false premises, and then goes to work for a reproductive rights organisation, and suddenly what she did in her private life shouldn't mean she's gonna be the same outside (even being the same subject?).

This smells like double standards.


Edit: I pointed out the blatant sexism here and some subreddit permabans me "for participating in a redpill/incel" sub. That subreddit explicitly states they're against sexism, yet my anti-sexist stance here triggers them somehow. Or perhaps they abhor one sided sexism but not the other sided sexism? Did I mention double standards before?

[–]Huffers1010 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Writing off dissent as politically driven is the oldest trick in the book. If you decide that someone is simply an unacceptable person, you don't have to deal with what they say.

You've probably noticed that it's a very common tactic of what we might call hardline feminism to refuse point blank to engage in the debate; to ignore, to disregard, to ban and delete, turn blind eye, and generally to do everything it can to avoid participating in the discussion. It's an easy way to avoid having to answer difficult questions just like those about the double standards you're pointing out.

To be fair, their narrative is so dominant that they really have no incentive to listen to anyone. At this stage, any argument advanced by anyone claiming to be operating from a perspective of critical social justice is likely to be publicly accepted by more or less everyone, including people who privately disagree with it (which is the real core of the problem).

The problem with this is that a lack of constructive discussion turns up the heat massively under any issue like this and polarises people to the extremes in both directions. My feeling is that a lot of people on r/mensrights are convinced that society is absolutely falling apart due to the influence of critical social justice and the brand of hardline feminism that it provokes. I don't think it's that bad, at least not yet. I think it's down to a small number of very outspoken extremists and the terrible moral cowardice of people who won't take risks to oppose them. I am not one of those people; I have made myself very unpopular in real life by speaking out, and I have received messages of support in private from people who would not speak that support publicly.

Hardline feminism is not popular in society. It's not even that popular among moderate feminists, but it is powerful, and it has very few incentives to answer difficult questions.

[–]Kveld_Ulf 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I agree. I find myself agreeing with feminists in lots of issues and I acknowledge there are lots of areas needing some work to equalise women's rights with those we men have. Yet acknowledging that doesn't negate that in certain other areas men have it tough, and those problems also need to be addressed. It's not a zero-sum game. Addressing men's issues and acknowledging men's rights are sometimes disregarded and disrespected doesn't have to mean not acknowledging women's issues, but some hard-line feminists don't think so, and that's why some of them have opposed to phone line help for abused men and safe places for them.

If anything, besides infuriating, it's very sad.

[–]RobStonman 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They ignore us. So why not ignore them? Any wahmen asking for help, advice, etc need to be ignored. If they get up in your face (face to face or online) just ignore them. If its online block and report. Even if they don't bother you do it anyway. Silence them. If you want to go to the extreme get someone with the know how to doxx them or delete their account. Or better yet have them get hacked and post as them to make them look like a fool. Get people to hate them so they get mentally fucked up. If its face to face just walk away. If that's not possible file a lawsuit for harassment. If you get laughed at sabotage their life. Order 50 pizzas to their house. Place of work. And other things to fuck with them. Use a public phone booth. Its free to call from them now. Order a demolisher to their place to have it knocked down. Get their car towed. Do all manner of things to fuck with them lol. Make them go crazy so they can't function.

They want to try and fuck with you fuck with them 10x more.

[–]ImplodedPotatoSalad 17 points18 points19 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, a woman thats fucked up and just evil....how was that, local feminists? "Thst doesnt happen"? ;)

[–]AbysmalDescent 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That is an incredibly fucked up thing to do. He got the vasectomy because his partner told him that she didn't want to have kids, telling him she was planning to stay for the long run but knowing she was going to leave. Not only did she mislead him and break his trust but she effectively denied him the opportunity to ever be a father with anyone else as well. Maybe the next woman he meets his younger and wants to have kids. I don't know if this is just a preemptively vindictive move but it's absolutely disgusting. If a man gets a vasectomy for a woman, that is a huge sacrifice. It's effectively giving up a significant part of what makes him valuable as a man in a relationship, or even arguably a huge part of what defines him a man. Not something to just take for granted. Absolutely disgusting.

[–]PM_ME_DNA -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Luckily he can get it reversed. 95% success rate. But the fact he has to go through 2 procedures because of an ex-wife is disgusting.

[–]omegaphallic 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I hope he brings what she did up during divorce proceedings.

[–]InvestigatorOk5602 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What a piece of the nastiest shit this woman is.

[–]Moistcowparts 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This actually happened to a guy i worked with as well, already had kids with her but couldnt have any with his new wife because of it, he was very bitter

[–]PaineintheBurke 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Ok as somebody who's very Child Free, this is fucking predatory. You're not letting him choose, you're trying to force him into a decision he may not agree with just to fuck him over.

[–]PaineintheBurke 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As for the shit about how she may not reflect the same behavior in her career she would at home, that's not relevant. She's showing a history of abuse, and you shouldn't let people who abuse be in positions as counselors.

[–]throwaway3569387340 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

LOL.

I got snipped because the woman I had been with for 6 years and was planning on marrying didn't want more kids. She cheated on me and 6 months later was pregnant.

Luckily it was still a good decision for me (I already have kids) but anyone who does this to their partner is playing with fire.

EDIT: Laughing because I thought I was the only chump who would agree to this.

[–]JBrody 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I guess it helped you by not having to pay child support for the kid?

[–]red_philosopher 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She has a duty to disclose this gross ethical misconduct to any regulatory or professional organization. Besides, who wants someone like that as a friend?

[–]_THE_asshole 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Did the fucking response actually tell the questioner that just because she made this poor choice about reproductive rights doesn't mean she will make it about others and that she should just keep her mouth shut about her friends poor choice and move on.....the responder also slams the husband without knowing any details about the man at all...

What the fuck is this trash.

[–]vwatchrepair 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

"mY bOdY mY cHoIcE!!"

What happened to that? 🤔🤔🤔

[–]Xx_undersc0relife_xX 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Only applies to women apparently

[–]Oz70NYC 22 points23 points24 points 4 years ago (31 children) | Copy Link

Jokes on her. A Vasectomy can be reversed. Buddy of mine had one done when he married his 1st wife, cuz she didn't want kids. She cheated on him AND got pregnant by her side dude. My buddy divorced her immediately and wasn't on the hook for the kid cuz he got snipped. Bitch tried to contest on the 1% chance that a little soldier can slip through, so when the baby was born they DNA tested it...100% not his kid. She walks away with nothing from the divorce.

Fast forward 4 years later he remarried. New wife wants LOTS of kids. He gets the procedure reversed, they're pregnant within a month of trying. They now have 3 kids. He makes it his duty to flaunt his kids on social so the ex wife sees how awesome a dad he is. Meanwhile her lover wanted no part of being a dad, and was a dusty ass to begin with. So she's struggling. 42 with a 12 year old and unable to secure a dude who doesn't smash and dash.

[–]BalloonPilotDude 27 points28 points29 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

He got lucky then. They are NOT meant to be reversible and the longer you go the less chance it can be reversed.

The doctor was very clear about this when I got mine and I did the research prior to the procedure.

[–]Oz70NYC 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It had only been 4 years, and he was still in his late 20s.

[–]red_philosopher 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What a great story. Love it.

[–]EricAllonde[S] 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Great to read a story with a happy ending in this sub. Don't see that very often here.

[–]LettuceBeGrateful 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I feel bad for the kid, but that's 100% karma for the mom.

[–]Oz70NYC 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Kid's already fucked up. Defiant. Short tempered. Actually curses at and hits her. Kid has not a single ounce of love in them, because she doesn't know what it is. As I said, my buddy's ex didn't want kids. She hated them. So when she got preggers she was banking on maybe it being his. That 1% one of my buddy's swimmers made it through. Once that got shot down, she tried to hook in the dude she cheated with, but he's from Canada. He cut ties and went back to Nova Scotia. By this time she was too far along to abort, and her parents said they would disown her if she put the baby up for adoption.

She stalked my friend for the next year begging for a second chance. Even going as far as saying he didn't have to be anything to the child, she just didn't want to be alone. He in no short order told her to go fuck herself and fuck her kid as well. She tried spinning up a narrative that he said hateful things about her and her kid, but at this point everyone in our mutual circles knew she was full of shit, so that plan sank like the titanic. A year later he and his now wife announced they were having their 1st kid...and that sent the ex into the abyss. Her kid was now 2y/o at this point and I can only assume she laid all blame of her struggles on the child. End result 10 years later is a 12 year old who was raised by a resentful mother giving it back to her tenfold. You truly do reap what you sew.

[–]DecimatingDarkDeceit 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (24 children) | Copy Link

I do love Happy Ending to a story! :D

[–]SOwED -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

Don't you have a genocide to deny?

[–]DecimatingDarkDeceit -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

You have many to spare! Not that you actually care, your own self is far too busy being a stalker on people's accounts and comments

[–]SOwED -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

I'm Armenian though. I have many to spare?

[–]DecimatingDarkDeceit -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

Here you go ! Unfortunately your deluded obsession has to bring history even into this subreddit.

◊]This one is from Azerbaijan

https://idsb.tmgrup.com.tr/ly/uploads/images/2020/02/26/22467.jpg

https://cdnuploads.aa.com.tr/uploads/Contents/2019/02/25/thumbs_b_c_1280f611de95155f9a05dc7b0709a9c1.jpg?v=215108

◊] ...and This one is from Eastern Anatolia, Turks & Circassians

https://cdnuploads.aa.com.tr/uploads/PhotoGallery/2015/04/23/thumbs_b2_69605faae1bbb73f121c6d939265319a.jpg

https://cdnuploads.aa.com.tr/uploads/PhotoGallery/2015/04/23/thumbs_b2_28784138c84cb292c750902809c4f789.jpg

https://cdnuploads.aa.com.tr/uploads/PhotoGallery/2015/04/23/thumbs_b2_5bdecdec66673150d46089d887da153c.jpg

https://img.piri.net/mnresize/840/-/resim/imagecrop/2021/04/26/09/26/resized_4cfa6-e0cff9c6ermeni.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EWXAB6vWkAEv2Tn.jpg

https://trthaberstatic.cdn.wp.trt.com.tr/resimler/182000/183601.jpg

I am sure you shall come to these examples with plenty of blatant ignorance. Which is expected in all honesty. I can give you even more examples if you are from North America

[–]SOwED -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

Uh okay? I'm not denying those happened. Those are in the 1000s. Turkey killed a million Armenians in a much more systematic way. That's why it's called a genocide.

Also, even if Armenia had committed genocide, that doesnt excuse Turkey, and especially doesn't excuse the continued denial of the genocide.

At least Germany fully acknowledges its history.

[–]DecimatingDarkDeceit -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

Uh okay? I'm not denying those happened. Those are in the 1000s

I am sure you shall come to these examples with plenty of blatant ignorance

Alas, Those are not in the 1000s. That is literally the first excuse you came up with, the total death toll was way higher especially on anatolia

[–]SOwED -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

Did the Armenian genocide take place and was it perpetrated by the Turks?

[–]DecimatingDarkDeceit -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

What?

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is absolutely fucked up and whoever thinks that this is fine is a monster. I can understand a woman breaking up with a man after he did a vasectomy. But planning to break up with him while pushing him to do a vasectomy is something else.

[–]shoretel230 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The explaining away that the NYT writer makes in the 3rd paragraph is crazy to me.

Nobody would ever, or should ever, defend a man who would manipulate a woman to get her tubes tied and then divorce her.

This hypocrite should be outed. If you're not living your values at an organization that is espousing specific values, you shouldn't be working there.

[–]blaizken_420 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What the fuck

[–]Mythandros 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

First of all, what the fuck?!

Second of all, that's fucking disgusting.

[–]JamesBoyle123 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

how disgusting...imagine a man doing this to a woman and the worldwide outrage that the enemy media would garner from it.

[–]CyrexPlex 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Wow...

Acceptance of assault based on gender. Wonder if title was "is it ok to have your spouse get her tubes tied before you ditch her?"

[–]red_philosopher 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Tubal ligation would be more comparable.

[–]GeekofFury 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Same thing.

[–]EpicVen 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Disgusting woman.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My ex did this with me, not about getting snipped though, but to go back to school. She begged me to quite my job and go back to school. After some time I did. She asked for a divorce an hour before I went to bed for the first final.

She planned the whole thing, even said she wanted to break up for a year but "had to wait for the right time". The right time was making sure I had no income and spent all my money on school.

Women can be fucking insanely evil in relationships, it's kind of gross how they are always championed, there are plenty of women out there capable of doing some very horrible, life changing shit. They just play the whole it's not physical violence card (this is why they harp on this subject so much, to play off physical trumps all other abuse), but in many cases their stunts are way worse than getting your ass kicked.

Shit, I was a small dude in HS, I got the shit kicked out of me all the time. Did no where near the damage as my divorce.

[–]jinladen040 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (43 children) | Copy Link

I mean if she wanted to work in Planned Parenthood, she's got the right mindset that's for goddamned sure so Its honestly no wonder it was a such a Trivial decision for her imo, knowing her future line of work. Which is likely her Career now and its no wonder Planned Parenthood performs record breaking Abortions each her with such fine employees like this.

Her reasoning "He can barely manage the kids he has, so she doesnt want him to be distracted by more children" What? You're leaving him, how the fuck is that going to be any business of yours if he wants kids with a future partner, yet you adovate for "Reproductive Choice". Then the she responds to his anger about revealing the decision to divorce after the vasectomy by saying to him that "She was pretty sure that women aren't going to be interested in having children with someone his age anyway". Imo, this was just a way she could maintain control over him after the divorce, it guarenteed her Alimoney and Child Support because he certainly isn't going to be spending that money on potential future children.

[–]binkerfluid 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Record breaking abortions...?

Like what, fastest time or furthest distance?

[–]LettuceBeGrateful 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

First abortion to win a 200m dash, first abortion to achieve 15 ft in the long jump, etc...

[–]binkerfluid 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

maybe shot putting them?

[–]jinladen040 -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In abortions performed, over a quarter million yearly the past few years alone. Over 14million in that orgnizations lifetime.

More babies aborted than all of the Deaths in Americas Wars since the Civil War.

[–]BeanBodhi 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (34 children) | Copy Link

Not true on planned parenthood

[–]LokisDawn 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (33 children) | Copy Link

Whaddaya mean?

[+]BeanBodhi -7 points-6 points-5 points 4 years ago (32 children) | Copy Link

Planned parenthood barely does any abortions. Their focus is actually health care for people that don’t have a lot of money men included

[–]jinladen040 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (31 children) | Copy Link

Lol what? They perform 117 abortions to every adoption. Theyve performed over a quarter million yearly the past few years alone.

Sincerely, do your research if you believe what you said was true. Planned Parenthood is in the business of abortions over any other service they offer.

[–]BeanBodhi -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (30 children) | Copy Link

Oh PLEASE do your reserch and look at their main focus. And don’t you dare put abortion and adoption in the same comparison

[–]jinladen040 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago* (29 children) | Copy Link

Um noo, dont you dare minimize the 250000k babies murdered annually in the past few yeara by that organization.

Over 13 million since its inception. Thats morally and ethically wrong, no matter how you spin it out to be Womens Rights.

For your own morals and ethics, do your research and get your facts anywhere but planned parenthood themselves.

We're all here today because our Mothers didnt abort us.

[–]BeanBodhi 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

One. It’s not murder. Two. It’s not morally wrong. What’s morally wrong is forcing someone to give birth.

[+]BeanBodhi -9 points-8 points-7 points 4 years ago (27 children) | Copy Link

If you don’t have a uterus or the capability of giving birth-DO NOT speak about abortion

[–]terramir3 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link

The definition of murder is the willful taking if a human life this is what abortion is, also the propaganda that it's just a few cells is not true, fetuses feel pain and have to be given drugs before the procedure is completed. If it's after like 13 plus weeks they crush the skull to remove it easier. And a woman's body - a woman choice is a flawed argument, the body affected most is the unborn baby obviously. Even before the 13th week suction actually tears the unborn into pieces. This whole this is too horrible to really think about for too long. By definition it is murder, albeit in many countries legalized murder, but it's murder nonetheless.

[–]BeanBodhi 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link

It actually cannot feel pain 😂 you realize that at 13 weeks it has the beginning of bones right? The fetus HAS NO RIGHTS. It’s not murder. The fetus doesn’t even have a heartbeat. It’s not horrible to think about. It’s surgery.

[–]Kravego -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Oh fuck outta here with that right wing anti-Planned Parenthood bullshit. /r/Conservative is over that-a-way if you want to circlejerk about Planned Parenthood and abortion. This is not the sub.

[–]jinladen040 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Nah, all are welcomed here. And im actually already subbed to Conservative, thanks though. The facts about PP speak for themselves, they perform 117 abortions to every adoption. In the past few years alone they've aborted over a quarter million babies annually, over 13 million since its inception.

The facts do speak for themselves, since they receive Government funding, they have to release their numbers. So it's pretty clear about what instituion does, even if they market themselves differently or twist it to be about Womens Rights. You do have every right to ignore the facts, its your life. But the numbers are staggering. And in any other circumstance you would agree murder is wrong so i dont understand why you're arguing against me about PP.

But this is actually the Sub to discuss these things because A father has no say in an Abortion which is another MensRights issue.

[–]Kravego 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

All are welcomed here, but only to discuss men's issues. You're bringing up PP for no fucking reason at all, because dumbass conservatives like you can't go a fucking hour without bitching about it.

And i don't give a flying FUCK about "how many abortions" they perform versus adoption. So what if they perform more abortions. That's a good thing. Abortion is a necessary medical procedure, as literal decades of medical and sociological evidence shows.

And in any other circumstance you would agree murder is wrong so i dont understand why you're arguing against me about PP.

Oh how did I fucking know this was going to come up. Go fuck off to a fucking church and cry about it. Abortion isn't murder. You can't force someone to donate their body for 9 months so that someone else may live.

But this is actually the Sub to discuss these things because A father has no say in an Abortion which is another MensRights issue.

Of course he doesn't have a say in what a woman does to her body. And it should stay that way. This isn't a MensRights issue, it's an issue to knuckle-dragging conservative fuckwads that want to control women. If men were the ones that got pregnant, not a single person on this sub would be advocating the right for women to "have a say" in abortion.

It's not a MensRights issue to force someone - anyone - to donate or sacrifice any part of their body for anyone else. You can't be forced to donate blood, plasma, a kidney, or anything else to anyone else, even if your denial would cause that person to die. There is 0 difference between that and abortion, and if you can't see that then kindly go fuck yourself.

[–]jinladen040 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Abortion is a MensRights issue because a man has no legal say in whether a woman abort. Which can be argued both ways but its an issue nonetheless.

Babies arent created Asexually, it takes both Male and Female, DNA from both parents which forms a good foundation for it being a Mens rights issue.

Theres other avenues of handing off responsibility of a child. Especially with the countless couples unable to conceive on their own. The vast majority of abortions can very well be adobted.

And ill never understand why Liberals are so quick with the insults and emotional kneejerk reactions. You can debate better when you dont lose your cool.

[–]Admiralthrawnbar 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Short answer, no, long answer, if you even have to ask you are a terrible human being.

[–]terramir3 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I dunno maybe she didn't want to share support with some future kids??? If I was him I would get micro surgery and have ten kids just so her support check becomes 20 bucks a month lol

[–]sexytimeinseattle -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

lol you think that's how that works?

[–]terramir3 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Actually it does there is a maximum percentage of your income, but you have to keep going to court to get it adjusted. But yeah under a certain income level they can only take like 30% of your income but it varies from state to state. Personally while I would do my best to support my children I personally believe that child support in general violates the 13th amendment, as it is involuntary servitude even though the guy didn't commit a crime. Many child support statutes also violate the 14th amendment as well equal protection under the law and such

[–]NeoNotNeo 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When would it be OK

How is the NY times not ashamed of that headline.

[–]Normal-Yogurtcloset5 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I wonder what this woman’s response would be if a man had his wife get her tubes tied and then divorced him? If I were in the friend’s position I would have told the husband the truth. Hopefully, he’d find out before going through with the procedure.

[–]Mongoose_Stew 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

" she felt that he could barely manage to parent the children they had and that she didn’t want him to be distracted by more kids."

Translation: She didn't want him to have more kids because it would lessen the child support payments.

[–]MDot_Cartier 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So let me get this straight....she works for planned parenthood AND SHES A SADIST😲

SHOCKING

[–]Kaylarmagic 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

WTF?! THEIR BODY THEIR CHOICE APPLIES TO EVERYONE.

[–]ShiZniT3 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

dudes... never get vasectomies. ever. buy boxes of plan b and condoms instead if you dont want pregnancies.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I just went monk mode. If you never touch me there is no case.

[–]ShiZniT3 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

or that, make monasteries great again lol. monks only clubs.

[–]Myahmans 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There's a word for this: Eugenics

This is literal fucking proof that feminism is going towards eugenics and nobody's going to be tapping on the breaks at any time.

To quote a glorious meme originating from 4chan: Hans, get the flammenwerfer.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Gurl, what?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Imagine if the roles were reversed

That bitch should burn in hell

[–]darknessblae -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I just can't today I'm not strong enough

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There ya have it, boys -- another reason to rush out and get married as soon as possible!

[–]Laytheblameonluck 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Plot twist: she works for "an organization dedicated to reproductive choice and plans to work as a counselor"

The editorial response is right on this though.

If a complaint was made, absolutely nothing would happen about it. Nothing.

[–]Mongoose_Stew 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Damn. That bitch was evil.

[–]RobStonman 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why did she want him to do that though? What does she care? She won't be in his life anymore. Is she crazy?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My ex tried to convince me to get one. We probably would’ve broken up eventually if I had tried to stay anyway.

[–]vhisic 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

is it ok?

no its fucking messed up. If you do this you are a psychopath

[–]TracyMorganFreeman 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well it's legal, but it's cruel and shitty.

Still, you could try suing her.

[–]kapriece 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sounds like she wanted to make sure he wouldn't have another kid thus keeping whatever CS she gets the same. A lot of women don't know that if you have more children it reduces child support paid to each mother. It depends on the state as well. Some of these 304s play the long game and we never see it coming. But but believe all Wahmen and they would never do anything like that. At least he wont be taken advantage of by the CS system when his sentence is served.

[–]criolle 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If he has more children, his child-support and attention could be divided into smaller parts.
By preventing future offspring, she ensures maximum attention (and funding) to her own offspring.

[–]needalife94 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

NO......... NO IT'S NOT.

[–]Distorted_Passion 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The answer is no and she should be prosecuted because she literally planned this.

[–]DecimatingDarkDeceit 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Summary: Woman literally enforcing HL2 - Suppression field ~ {on Men}. Manipulating man to have operations that should entirely left to men's own decision

[–]TendieDinner777 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Would have been dead before the article was written, swear to god.

[–]BaconCatBug 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean, any man who actually wants to start a family in todays world is insane, in my book.

[–]nameku17 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Depending on the type of vasectomy I think it can be reversed, but I have no context in this case.

[–]EricAllonde[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The general rule on reversals is that success rate declines the longer you wait.

So if he gets it reversed immediately, within a few months, his chances are pretty good. If he waited 5 or 10 years, he'd likely be out of luck.

[–]CheesecakeFar27411 points 4 years ago [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

She didn't force him to, he made the decision on his own. They are also reversible most of the time. A lot of cry baby victims in here trying to equate this to "abuse". A grown man can make his own decisions.

[–]EricAllonde[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Predictable feminist man-hating. Of course, if the genders were flipped you’d scream blue murder. And vasectomies are not reliably reversible, especially after a few years. But you know that, you simply hate men so much that you don’t care.

[–]Low-Material-7956 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

That's just mean to say. After my husband and I had 3 kids and I have auto-immune issues so the last preg was really hard on me. I had our 3rd when I was 30 so we were done!! Married in 01 so 21 years now. I asked my husband to get a vasectomy thru my 3rd preg, cause it's quick, easy, cheap and he said yes but then once I was 9 mo preg he started pissing backwards & what if he wanted more kids etc. Well my health and our Finances couldn't handle another. I had my tubes done after delivering that isn't reversible unlike a Vasectomy, it was way more riskier, expensive & painful and caused long term health issues. Google Essure, Watch the Bloody Truth Doc, that's what I had so that he didn't have to get snipped and cause the serious health issues it's caused me & hearing from his buddies how it was just a snip & so quick like really you were a big ole baby, lol

So his cousin who is like 48 now was on his 3rd marriage and had 6 kids and grandpa had been snipped after his youngest was born & that kids like 17. So the 3rd wife had no kids and even tho he has a bunch of grandkids and his youngest is getting close to graduating and he was in his 40's they told us that they had his Vasectomy reversed after 15+ years and even his age being older it worked. She kept getting preg. No one forced anyone to do anything & Vasectomies are reversable unlike most procedures for women. I need a complete hyster now which is really dangerous because of the springs.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter