TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

A woman with an STD infects a man she has consensual sex with, then falsely accuses him of rape because she was afraid he was going to report her to the authorities for infecting him. She said she was "scared and didn’t know what to do."

Title_IX_For_All

March 8, 2022
1302 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://www.mlive.com/news/saginaw-bay-city/2022/03/bay-city-woman-made-bogus-claim-that-friend-raped-her-now-faces-felony-police-say.html
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title A woman with an STD infects a man she has consensual sex with, then falsely accuses him of rape because she was afraid he was going to report her to the authorities for infecting him. She said she was "scared and didn’t know what to do."
Author

Title_IX_For_All

Upvotes 1302
Comments 99
Date March 8, 2022 5:50 PM UTC
(4 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/t9mijx/a_woman_with_an_std_infects_a_man_she_has/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/a-woman-with-an-std-infects-a-man-she-has.1106114
https://theredarchive.com/post/1106114
Top posts by Title_IX_For_All

A nightclub security video showing his rape accuser leading him to have sex caused a judge to toss the criminal case against him, declaring it did not meet the minimal pretrial evidential burden. USC expelled him anyway! He filed a civil suit & was just reinstated.

2136 upvotes
December 31, 2018
/r/MensRights

Judge rules boys discriminated against in Title IX sports case

1547 upvotes
November 14, 2018
/r/MensRights

Campaign: complimenting a woman, asking for her number, or giving her any attention is regarded as predatory in the off-chance it is unwanted. At some point, even a cynic should wonder if the purpose is simply to demonize men.

1154 upvotes
September 29, 2023
/r/MensRights

Another accused student commits suicide. Parents sue.

640 upvotes
February 17, 2023
/r/MensRights

Jezebel, the notoriously misandrist and gynomyopic online magazine launched by Gawker Media, is finally being shut down.

580 upvotes
November 9, 2023
/r/MensRights

A false sex-assault accuser has been sentenced: 12 years probation and "court costs and fees totaling $290 in $100 monthly installments beginning 30 days after she was sentenced." Basically, probation + the cost of a Nintendo Switch, on an installment plan.

546 upvotes
February 27, 2024
/r/MensRights

Lawsuit: a university counselor initiated an unauthorized investigation against a falsely accused student who confided in her about the pain of being wrongly accused. This resulted in him being dismissed from the program.

497 upvotes
September 12, 2024
/r/MensRights

73% of Top U.S. Universities Do Not Guarantee the Presumption of Innocence in Title IX Sexual Misconduct Trials

461 upvotes
December 25, 2018
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]Rough-Area4765 270 points271 points272 points 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Happy women's international day.....

My wife was so scared she had filed for divorce and didn't tell me that she got naked, started blowing me, then stopped and accused me of domestic violence. TRUE STORY!

2 years later, hundreds of thousands of dollars spent on attorneys in both civil and criminal court and the result was: "It's ok, she was scared and didn't think about the consequences."

No judge will ever hold a woman accountable for false accusation. They will err on the side of caution vs risk their career (elected) by staining their reputation of being a misogynistic judge.

This is the world we live in!

[–]KodyLapointe 54 points55 points56 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

men are screwed when it comes to courts if it involves the kids/wife. one of the most important places for there to not be any bias and men are treated like shit in it.

[–]Psychological_Dig281 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There is a reason young male suicides are at an all time high.

[–]iGhostEdd 30 points31 points32 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Imagine being a judge and thinking that applying the same law to both sexes is sexist. Oh my god

[–]Dismal-Opposite-6946 41 points42 points43 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm so sorry that happened to you

[–]Noob_master_slayer 21 points22 points23 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women are seen as children in adult bodies by law. No wonder female accountability is low.

[–]Psychological_Dig281 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I swear it's a part of life now "Son we gotta have this talk you can do the right thing treat her right but if she's so inclined as to. She can potentially put you in prison for a long time and you will be targeted by other inmates have a gooday I put leftover pizza in your lunch"

[–]heyyy-kiddo 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It kind of is already a common thing to pass down to fellow men.

Even with all the banning and bad spotlight it's effects can be seen:men don't marry and don't have children,stopped having face 2 face meetings alone with women and prefer a work only , no friendship kind of stuff in most jobs.

It pours in other social aspects too. Lots of women can't find partners after the age of 30. Lots of men after 30 just do their own thing without any thoughts about marriage or long term , invested relationships.

If they'd really legalize prostitution I guarantee you the birth rates would plummet even lower and so would marriages.

In US idk who has children, but in Western EU nobody has anymore from what I deduced from the census.

[–]asparagus112 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This is why I’m not getting married lol. I dont want to be legally binded to anything.

[–]heyyy-kiddo 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Forget legally bound,you are signing a slave contract in the face of the law effectively.

A wife is no different than a long time girlfriend romantically wise.

[–]Practical-Rip6471 445 points446 points447 points 4 years ago* (34 children) | Copy Link

She's scared and didn't know what to do, so the first thing to come to her mind was to make a false rape allegation. See how quick they resort to that option, yet they insist that false allegations are rare.

[–]Psychological_Dig281 151 points152 points153 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

"I'll just tell people you beat me" - An ex girlfriend/almost fiance after I found out she cheated on me from a co worker at a work function. I wanted to leave then and there wound up staying with her cause I was so scared and being miserable because of that but eventually got the courage to leave. Nothing ever came of it if she did tell anyone it never came back on me afaik.

[–]bluechair01 38 points39 points40 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Glad you ditched the cunt

[–]stupuff 39 points40 points41 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

There was a good video I watched where they explain the false logic applied. If I find it, I will link it. But the Coles notes was that only like 8.6% of rapes allegations are found to be false in criminal proceedings, so... "logically" that means 91.4% are true right? Well, in the same findings its actually displayed that only like - +12% finish in criminal charges from being found, without a doubt, true...

The grey in the middle was not enough proof to convict either way without a shadow of a doubt.

[–]themolestedsliver 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Would love a video in this.

[–]stupuff 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://youtu.be/I8zSDvaYrRw

Here it is in a form.

And it sits in the middle, it's demos how interpreting data wrong can swirve the message

[–]xGreenxFirex 27 points28 points29 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Same for when they regret having sex with someone.

Or had sex with many people.

Or had 3sum, 4sum.

[–]HenryCGk 18 points19 points20 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A thief is someone who thinks everyone steals.

A karren is someone who thinks everyone complains to authorities.

[+]DankimusMaximus27 -173 points-172 points-171 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Just because it happened once, it does not mean it happens frequently

[–]mouldysandals 95 points96 points97 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

once

[–]ThatOneCrusader1 55 points56 points57 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hey pot meet kettle

[–]ABeeBox 47 points48 points49 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

*once*

Are you a troll?

[–]cain8708 43 points44 points45 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There are 2 linked articles in the OP link of females reporting false rape allegations and getting arrested for that. I mean with doing additional zero clicking there are 3 times it happened.

How many times should something happen before you say "OK that's a prpblem"? If 3 rapes happened would you still say "that doesn't mean it happens frequently"?

[–]DevilishRogue 32 points33 points34 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Whilst the actual number is a grey number and can never be exactly known we have enough evidence from exonerated convictions to know that hundreds of convictions are wrongful and these are the cases that are brought to court, thousands more there is enough evidence to prove innocence (as he-said-she-said evidence - and sometimes even less evidence than that - is enough to obtain convictions):

https://www.avoiceformen.com/sexual-politics/ten-reasons-false-rape-accusations-are-common

http://www.fact.on.ca/news/news0109/np010908.htm

https://www.centreformalepsychology.com/male-psychology-magazine-listings/false-allegations-of-rape-the-true-extent-remains-unknown?s=09

https://thoughtcatalog.com/janet-bloomfield/2014/12/13-women-who-lied-about-being-raped-and-why-they-did-it

It happens frequently because logic dictates that it happens frequently.

[–]Practical-Rip6471 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Listen you extremely stoopid person, in the UK every single person charged with bringing a false allegation, has been convicted. No other charge dies that happen. 100% conviction rate.

[–]Chipster339 -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

I read also the other side many times. That girls don’t report rape because nothing happens and they get socially destroyed as well for slut shaming or you deserved it. Which side is right? Men who claim their career is destroyed or women who claim nothing happens?

[–]Practical-Rip6471 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

Don't be stupid there's NO comparison. Men who rape or abuse women, and women who lie about being abused and falsely accuse, are what's known as, criminals. Do you understand that?

Men who do not rape or abuse women, should not be treated like those that do. Do you also understand that?

I just wish there was some legal procedure, a due process if you like, where the evidence or voracity of allegations could be tested, say in front of a jury made up of the accused peers, where innocence is assumed and guilt has to proven.

But look at me, some hopeless dreamer.

[–]Chipster339 -5 points-4 points-3 points 4 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

I meant when women report they have been raped, I have read that nothing happens to the guy and they get the worst of it with slut shaming etc. At the same time I have read that when women report rape the life of the guy is destroyed. Which one is it? They don’t happen both. I heard both sides. Which side happens most

[–]no-body 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't know where you read that, but that is 100% not the case nowadays, nor has it been for years, at least in the United States. It is really closer to what Practical-Rip6471 said.

Colleges, schools, etc. Have the title IC clause and immediately have kangaroo courts, many jobs fire the man immediately, etc. Etc. Only instance nothing may come of it, seemingly, is if you're a powerful politician/c-Suite exec, but thats a power dynamic vs. Gender

[–]Practical-Rip6471 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

You are a silly person. The woman's identity is protected and the man is put on blast, how the hell can you not understand who gets the worst of it, the police don't prosecute or the accused gets acquitted. If the identity of the accused was also protected, just like the accuser's is, a lot less vindictive accusations would be levelled.

[–]Chipster339 -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

I said i read it. Just go on the rape subreddit or something pro woman and you’ll find the same stories

[–]Practical-Rip6471 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

And of course you think you'll find any truth about men on any of those forums?

[–]Chipster339 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

That’s why I’m asking what you think of the other side of version. But you don’t even consider it you are so one minded

[–]Practical-Rip6471 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

The other side, between 40 and 45% of all rapes reported to police are maliciously false. Over 90% of rape reported through social media with no police report, are maliciously false. You might not believe those stats, but feminist groups actively encourage women to falsely accuse and go out of their way to suppress the scale of the problem. Not many men, no group of men, men's association or movement advocates for rapists, or tries to excuse their behavior, tries to suppress the figures or blames anybody other than those committing the crime.

In those circumstances, who do think is going to be more honest and can be a fairer discerner of justice out of the two sides?

[–]Chipster339 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

With a quick search I see between 2 and 10%. Do you have any source

[–]63daddy 75 points76 points77 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It’s good to see a woman MAY be held responsible for falsely accusing a man but sadly that’s not typically the case. Only time will tell whether she is actually held responsible or not.

Thanks for sharing. It will be interesting to see if she actually serves any time or not.

[–]eldred2 29 points30 points31 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Nah. She's only in trouble for having sex while HIV+.

[–]turbulance4 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How do know she is HIV+?

[–]rainbow_bro_bot 66 points67 points68 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And because a woman said she's "scared" everyone will have sympathy on her and give her a pass. As for the man who has now has his life ruined, well too bad for him innit.

Male privilege I guess.

[–]OldEgalitarianMRA 172 points173 points174 points 4 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

Unless I have forgotten how to read or, at the end of the article is the meat. She didn't just have an STD. She is HIV+ and will someday probably get AIDS. It is a felony in Michigan to have sex if you're HIV+ without letting someone else know. It seems two guys had sex with her that night. It could be a death sentence.

Lesson: Be careful and wrap it up. Some women will not tell you they are HIV+. HIV is very transmissible by heterosexual sex and most people in the world get it that way.

[–]63daddy 95 points96 points97 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yep.

If “all” she did was falsely accuse a man, she may not be facing any charges. The main reason she’s facing charges is she violated Michigan law by hiding the fact she’s HIV positive.

[–]dude21862004 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Except her only charge was "false report of a felony" so I'm guessing they were trying to point out that she wouldn't have even been in trouble because it's only illegal if you have HIV/AIDS.

So, it turns out, "If “all” she did was falsely accuse a man, she may not be facing any charges" is completely incorrect, and that's exactly the reason she's facing charges.

[–]throwaway3569387340 42 points43 points44 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's strange how they hide that until the end.

[–]WingsofSky 31 points32 points33 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I think there's medication you can take if it's within 2-3 days to prevent hiv/aids infection.

Though it has to be taken very quickly after infection.

Hopefully the guy was treated.

[–]OldEgalitarianMRA 40 points41 points42 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

There is Prep which can be taken to prevent HIV transmission and it is said to be highly effective but you have to take it for a while before sex to build up your blood level.

[–]subzero_600 18 points19 points20 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There is also PEP, a 28 day course taken after a possible exposure to try and prevent infection.

https://prepdaily.org/whats-the-difference-between-prep-and-pep/

[–]Dismal-Opposite-6946 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This was horrifying to read and I hope they're both going to be okay. I'm so glad that those medications exist now and it's not a death sentence like it used to be. Of course no one wants to get it but I'm glad now that there are medicines like that and once they get you to where you're undetectable. I hope they fry her ass.

[–]WingsofSky 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No no no.

This medication blocks you from being infected, if you take it within 1-2 days. Totally.

Not just temporarily.

So if you have unprotected sex with someone then take the medication within hours. You won't get hiv/aids from that encounter. Although it's something I wouldn't risk.

[–]timmah1991 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

HIV is very transmissible by heterosexual sex and most people in the world get it that way.

Not sure if you are pushing an agenda or just ignorant, but both of the claims you’ve made are incorrect.

https://www.aidsmap.com/about-hiv/vaginal-sex-and-risk-hiv-transmission

A meta-analysis of studies of heterosexual HIV transmission found that, in high-income countries prior to the introduction of combination therapy, the risk per sexual act was 0.04% if the female partner was HIV positive and the male partner was HIV negative. The risk was 0.08% when the male partner was HIV positive and the female partner HIV negative.

https://www.hiv.gov/hiv-basics/overview/data-and-trends/statistics

In 2019, the largest percentages of HIV infections were attributed to male-to-male sexual contact (66% overall and 81% among males.)

[–]OldEgalitarianMRA 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just spreading facts of how HIV is currently being transmitted. Not the transmission rate per sexual encounter. There are a lot more straight people. That's why straight people have more HIV.

​

Almost all (95%) of new infections of HIV are in the world's poor countries

Without access to antiretroviral drugs, most of the 40 million people currently living with HIV will die

Heterosexual transmission is responsible for most HIV infections in poor countries

Programmes to change behaviour and promote condoms and treatment of sexually transmitted infections are effective in preventing the spread of HIV

Large scale prevention efforts have been successful in only a few countries, mainly because of inadequate resources and lack of international commitment

Antiretroviral drugs reduce viral load in blood and consequently in genital fluids and may help prevent transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1122131/

​

Number of People with HIV—There were approximately 37.7 million people across the globe with HIV in 2020. Of these, 36 million were adults and 1.7 million were children aged 0-14 years. More than half (53%) were women and girls.

https://www.hiv.gov/hiv-basics/overview/data-and-trends/global-statistics

​

For the first time in a decade, the number of new HIV diagnoses among heterosexuals is higher than for gay and bisexual men*, according to new figures for England from the UK Health Security Agency.Half of all new HIV diagnoses were in heterosexuals (49%) in England in 2020, compared to 45% in gay and bisexual men.*

https://www.tht.org.uk/news/heterosexual-hiv-diagnoses-overtake-those-gay-men-first-time-decade

[–]IronJohnMRA 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Interesting. For some reason I thought it was needle sharing that most people got HIV.

[–]Lifeintherockies 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No that's hepatitus c you're thinking about.

[–]_THE_asshole 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You better not being home anything less than a B junior

[–]turbulance4 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The officer then spoke with the man, who said he knew Larner from Facebook and that she had wanted to come to his place after having a fight with her mother. He said they and another man had sex and that, afterward, Larner informed them she had an STI, at which point he told her to leave.

In Michigan, it is a crime for a person who knows they have HIV or AIDS to have sex with another person without first disclosing their infection. Other STIs, such as herpes, syphilis, or gonorrhea, are not covered by an infection-specific statute.

Does it? They are not actually making a claim about which STI she had.

[+]his_purple_majesty -7 points-6 points-5 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

It doesn't say she had HIV.

[–]OldEgalitarianMRA 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It says she was charged with a crime and then it says:

In Michigan, it is a crime for a person who knows they have HIV or AIDS to have sex with another person without first disclosing their infection. Other STIs, such as herpes, syphilis, or gonorrhea, are not covered by an infection-specific statute.

[–]his_purple_majesty 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

On the afternoon of her arrest, Larner appeared in Bay County District Court for arraignment on one count of false report of a felony, itself felony punishable by up to four years in prison and a $2,000 fine.

[–]OldEgalitarianMRA 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I stand corrected. I said it was hard to understand. Still the information on HIV is all very important for the men on this sub to learn.

[–]his_purple_majesty 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It is weird that they just threw that in at the end there and does leave it somewhat unclear. It's bad reporting.

[–]YourPillsAintWorkin 31 points32 points33 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Sounds like she knew exactly what to do.

[–]SuninMyPalm 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

she planned it all along, accuse of rape, steal his stuff, run away.

[–]regularcomments 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"scared and didn’t know what to do"- The typical excuse an irresponsible woman gives because she knows that in this victimhood era we live, that makes her earn a lot of sympathy from emotional easy-manipulated idiots.

[–]Normal-Yogurtcloset5 59 points60 points61 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

It’s frightening how quickly some women will use a rape claim to get their way. Unfortunately, this isn’t something new and won’t stop until women who make false rape allegations are sentenced to the amount of time the accused would have been sentenced to if they’d been found guilty and convicted.

[–]PeppinoGreen 37 points38 points39 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

They need to get WORSE sentences, as they're weaponizing the justice system.

They're not just inflicting damage to innocent, but also using limited resources (which are used to help people) in their crimes.

[–]Normal-Yogurtcloset5 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Agreed!

[–]Dismal-Opposite-6946 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree especially because I'm actually a survivor of sexual assault myself and I know what it feels like. It makes me ill when I see people falsely accusing someone of happy cuz if they have never actually had it happen to them they have no idea how it feels afterward.

[–]dukunt 19 points20 points21 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hey!....I'm the victim here!!

/s

[–]Dismal-Opposite-6946 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Of all the things I've right on this subject, this has to be the most fucked up one.

[–]magx01 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"I was scared" translates to "I was protecting my reputation."

[–]Soft_Leather_Couch 34 points35 points36 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I love how her response is the same sort of response you’d get from a kid after you found them trying to put dishwashing liquid into the washing machine after they wet the bed.

“I was scared and didn’t know what to do.”

Absolute adult children

[–]therenousername 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I hope she's left in prison for life fuck her

[–]auMatech 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

fuck her

I hope nobody does, don't need her spreading her HIV any further

[–]doggosrbabies 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I hate how she acts like the victim even when she didn't tell him in the first place she has an std

[–]Godskook 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Liar Liar had the best advice for women like this: STOP BREAKING THE LAW, ASSHOLE!

[–]trashtony69 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women like this KNOW what they’re doing and abuse the system when it works in favour of them knowing they’ll get a slap on the wrist. I’ve dealt with one before.

[–]TomsRedditAccount1 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If he wasn't aware that she had an STD, and if that would've been a hard no for him had he known, then it would mean that he did not give free and properly informed consent, which would mean that, actually, she raped him.

[–]YUPitsME_RICK 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

so, was she punished?

[–]auMatech 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Not for falsely accusing, that's for sure.

At the very least for breaking the law by not disclosing being HIV+ having an STI before having sex with someone

[+][deleted] 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]auMatech 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

On the afternoon of her arrest, Larner appeared in Bay County District Court for arraignment on one count of false report of a felony, itself felony punishable by up to four years in prison and a $2,000 fine.

Yep you are right, I must've glossed over this part. The STI part was only briefly mentioned later on, but no mention if there was punishment in that regard.

[–]JakeWasAlreadyTaken 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Make the punishment for false rape accusation death. No more false accusations.

[–]ninodelumbre 22 points23 points24 points 4 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Death is too easy...

Instead, have her face permanently branded with a symbol or words disclosing her crime. Severe ostrizing and shaming for the rest of her life.

[–]JakeWasAlreadyTaken 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Prison for 20 years, 30 days of release with mandatory ankle bracelets to show the world that you’re a monster, and then the death sentence

/s

[–]ninodelumbre 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sounds good.

[–]OzoneLaters 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

Let’s be honest... having that brand will get her extreme sympathy for the rest of her life and she could write a book telling her story which would make millions and also it would be something for the entire feminist movement to point to as persecution and would fuel at least another 5 generations of their bullshit.

The way to stop her would be mandatory 10 year to life sentence for exposing people to HIV per instance, plus a 15 year prison sentence for filing a false rape allegation... not eligible for parole or probation until 90% of sentence is served... sentences served consecutively not concurrently.

[–]JakeWasAlreadyTaken 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

And then the death sentence afterwards

[–]IronJohnMRA 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Dude, no. Then their suffering is over. If you really want to punish someone, you keep them alive as long as possible.

[–]JakeWasAlreadyTaken 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You’re right. On the last day of the 20th year, you don’t euthanize them and you actually just give them another 20 years. Then at the end of 40 years, the death penalty.

[–]OzoneLaters 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

No! At the end of the 40 years you sentence them to 80 more years.

Actually the worst would be that you sentence them to 1 year in prison and then each year that goes by you sentence them to another year and another year... over and over for their whole lifespan... also the day that they go to court to be sentenced for another year is their birthday.

[–]JakeWasAlreadyTaken 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Jesus Christ 💀😂

[–]OzoneLaters 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That is just about the coldest thing ever right? Almost as cold as having sex with people as an HIV positive person without telling anyone... and then accusing them of rape to get out of the punishment...

[–]keitarofujiwara 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Nope. Someone would make a sappy movie about people like her and then that symbol or words would turn into symbols of greatness, and now they're heroes. I can almost see it happening.

[–]boundarychimps 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I feel like maybe I saw a novel about someone having that sort of punishment once.

[–]SuninMyPalm 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

branding the skin around the eye and the nose with something like "FRA"(false rape accuser) and make them no longer protected by law. Should do the tick and teach them not to lie ever again

[–]UnfurtletDawn -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That sounds nice but a lot of them quickly drop charges or say that they made it up.

If they would be killed for admitting to lying they just wouldn't admit it

[–]IronJohnMRA 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This is why someone would lie about something like that.

[–]Halafax 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There are lots of reasons to “lie about something like that”.

Telling everyone that no woman would go through it to do so is the big lie. They all just pretend and they are right and scream at at anyone who points out how fucked up their position is.

[–]Crushed_95 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So she was scared and didn't know what to do but, tha one thing DID know to to is file a fasle r#p# accusation! Aint that a bish! Well lady! Have fun with your HIV!

[–]Gamernator-GX 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I would love to be a judge that handled all the rape cases in America. I'd want proof, not the woman's words and tears. PHYSICAL AND MEDICAL EVIDENCE from a doctor is needed. No trial can be held without EVIDENCE, let alone get a conviction.

Foreign DNA remains on the (living) human body for no longer than a month. As the epidermis skin cells on the top layer shed off, the layers below it push up from above the dermis, and also shed off in time. At any given moment, the lowest layer of epidermal cells will eventually shed off in a period of 4 weeks. This act pushes foreign DNA up and off the body. Foreign DNA cannot exist on the Dermis or Hypodermis because it will be attacked by the white blood cells as an invader. So rape victims have only one month to report rape, in order to have a doctor test their skin for foreign DNA and physical signs of rape. Injuries heal over time also. Date rape drugs stay in the system for only a matter of days, so if they want to say drugs were involved, this has to be proven by a doctor as well, within the time limit, or this claim must be thrown out of court.

Even if one has medical evidence of another person's DNA on them in the sexual areas, that doesn't necessarily prove that the contact was rape. It could have been consensual, but then the girl regretted it and claimed it was rape. So what is needed now? Witnesses. But I doubt anyone is standing nearby watching the rape event. So what do is REALLY needed? VIDEO PROOF. Even police officers need to use their dash cams and body cams in traffic court to prove someone sped through a red light. That's a misdemeanor, not a felony like rape. Videos are used to prove all other felonies too. I'm not saying I want to watch p*rn in court, but hey, its evidence. That girl has to be seen struggling, screaming, or completely immobilized from date rape drugs to prove it. Alcohol is never proof. They're BOTH intoxicated and not making the right decisions, but in some cases, its consensual, not rape.

With all these entitled people these days waiting 5, 10, 15, 20 some years to report a rape incident, do not have any medical evidence to back up their claims. Words alone are not evidence in a criminal case. Words alone don't even protect you in a tort or a simple case hearing. Claims against the clergy and Boy Scouts (both male institutions BTW, red flag) and other groups from years past shouldn't be allowed to even see courts as there is never any evidence besides words. Even if rape did indeed happen, it can't be judged now because too much time has passed and there is no solid medical or physical evidence.

We cant let people get away with these false rape accusation crimes. I would make it to where people had to know the regulations, facts, procedures and strict statute of limitations in order to bring a rape case to trial. No perfect evidence, no conviction of the accused. People who make false allegations or wait way too long will instead find themselves convicted of the crimes of perjury and false accusations. They will be sentenced to the same punishment in terms of years as if the accused was actually guilty. Any arrests or punishments already inflicted on the accused will be formally reversed and fully pardoned. Legal fees, past and present will be paid by the accuser. With me behind the bench of all these rape cases, we'd see a lot of women go to prison. Not because I want women in prison, but because justice is only justice when upheld legally with proper evidence. People who try to trick the system, make favor between defendant and plaintiff uneven and unbalanced due to sex or gender, or use it for greed and entitlement of oneself over others, will not get past me without being punished fully by the law.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter