TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

This is a joke right? The Sex Offender Registry Leaves Female Sex Offenders Open to Abuse

jasonfunk

August 27, 2018
1024 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/vb75m9/the-sex-offender-registry-leaves-female-sex-offenders-open-to-abuse/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title This is a joke right? The Sex Offender Registry Leaves Female Sex Offenders Open to Abuse
Author

jasonfunk

Upvotes 1024
Comments 125
Date August 27, 2018 12:22 AM UTC
(7 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/9ake32/this_is_a_joke_right_the_sex_offender_registry/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/this-is-a-joke-right-the-sex-offender-registry.1185516
https://theredarchive.com/post/1185516
Top posts by jasonfunk

The Rise of Victimhood Culture: Microaggressions, Safe Spaces, and the New Culture Wars

34 upvotes
May 13, 2018
/r/MensRights

POLL: Women are much less likely than men to say women should be required to register for Selective Service when they turn 18

25 upvotes
May 20, 2018
/r/MensRights

Just a small post encouraging you to tweet the hashtag #heartdiseasekillsmen

10 upvotes
February 11, 2015
/r/MensRights

In the light of Patricia Arquette perpetuating the wage gap myth, CBS evening news also falsely reported on the issue. Contact them at the link below, and/or at @CBSEveningNews on twitter, and demand a redaction/correction

9 upvotes
February 23, 2015
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–][deleted] 328 points329 points330 points 7 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

“...there is a reality for women offenders compared to men offenders...”

Yes, women offenders tend not to get their skulls bashed in.

[–]EricAllonde 191 points192 points193 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

But they get lewd letters sent to them in the mail, which you should know is much worse than a man getting his head bashed in, you misogynist. /s

[–][deleted] 110 points111 points112 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Its roughly analogous to the disparate punishments meted out to male and female Nazi collaborators in postwar Holland: the men were killed, while the women — gasp! — had their heads shaved.

If you don’t enjoy unwanted sexual attention from others, why did you think they would enjoy it from you?

[–]mwobuddy 67 points68 points69 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Its roughly analogous to the disparate punishments meted out to male and female Nazi collaborators in postwar Holland: the men were killed, while the women — gasp! — had their heads shaved.

Perfect example of male hyperagency and female hypoagency, for anything ranging from sexual behavior to traitorous country behavior.

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

They want agency without consequences.

[–]xNOM 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Well I guess they could do it the old fashioned way and get people with agency to read their minds and then the things that they want to get done, magically get done. I find the new approach quite refreshing. It's far more entertaining.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

By “new approach,” do you mean letting them try to figure it out for themselves and realize it’s not as easy as it looks?

[–]xNOM 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

LOL you, sir, are an optimist. :-)

[–]VioletteToussaint 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Female collaborators were killed as well. They shaved the head of women who slept with Germans soldiers.

[–]TracyMorganFreeman 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What like other underage boys found out who she is and hope to be next in line or something?

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah but that didn't really impact his life because male privilege under the patriarchy.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, he’s clearly benefited handsomely from that. /s

[–]speaker_for_the_dead 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Hey, women have always been the primary victims of having people register on a sex offenders list. /s

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You mean get their shit pushed in, right?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That’s part of the package!

[–]EricAllonde 117 points118 points119 points 7 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

This is actually good news. The sex offender registry needs to be reformed, and "No problem is ever fixed until it affects women", so now we might finally see some progress on this.

[–]mwobuddy 46 points47 points48 points 7 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

This is actually good news. The sex offender registry needs to be reformed, and "No problem is ever fixed until it affects women", so now we might finally see some progress on this.

This really should be in the info sidebar of this sub. Men dont matter. Its when harsh crime penalties start affecting WOMEN that things change. There needs to be clear awareness of reality. Otherwise a movement ends up being a delusional SJW group that can't really affect change.

[–]throwaway4681936 points 7 years ago* [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

It's like that Boko Haram group. Nobody cared about the hundreds of men they brutally murdered (while intentionally letting the women go free) until they kidnapped some girls from a school. Then people finally got upset.

[–]chadwickofwv 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's like that Boko Haram group. Nobody cared about the hundreds thousands of men they brutally murdered (while intentionally letting the women go free) until they kidnapped some girls from a school. Then people finally got upset.

FTFY

[–]girlwriteswhat 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Or the 10,000 boys they kidnapped over the 8 years they had the upper hand in Nigeria. Or the boys they burned alive in other attacks on schools.

​

[–]svenskbitch 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Men don't matter is of course an exaggeration. But one that is much closer to the truth if you are talking about men convicted of sex crimes. I think the upside EricAllonde points to is that once this issue gets attention and sympathy, there is only so far we can go to help affected women without addressing the question of what happens to men in the same situation. Surely, feminists would have pushed through sex offender registries only applying to male offenders if they could - but there are limits to the powers of a movement that purports itself to champion something they can reasonably portray as gender equality. Think about where the debate could take us. The plight of female offenders could bring about a discussion of what we do with those unlikely to pose real threats to society that find themselves ostracised by this blunt, inhumane instrument. When we do something about that, we also have to ask ourselves which male registrants are also unlikely to pose real threats - such as those urinating in public while drunk or sleeping with a 17 year old while 18 years of age. In Germany, far less extreme on the issue of sexual assault, a migrant was recently convicted to four years for touching a woman's breast. That is the same as for manslaughter. Few dare to speak out, lest they be accused of supporting sex offenders. Caring about those sex offenders we consider the most innocuous, such as women, might be the thin end of the wedge that enables a bit more reason to prevail in what is now a flurry of ideological penalism.

[–]mwobuddy 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Women are the primary victims of war.

[–]svenskbitch 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Not sure how you meant that reference, but perhaps there is more to it than terse dismissal.

Why would Hillary think that she could say something as patently false as that without all-out universal censure? Even if she did not mean it literally.

The only reason I could come up with is this: she said so against a perceived backdrop of a single-minded perspective on men as victims of war. While we of course are at least as concerned about civilian casualties, in the US these have been limited in living memory, which might warp her perspective further. Translate her statement into "most overlooked victims of war" and, seen through this perspective, her statement, while still objectionable, reenters the realm of less than loony political discourse.

Similarly, the only perspective through which the VICE article would not be blatantly sexist is one that assumes that, so far, we have only been concerned with male sex offenders. That is not true, though that concern has been overwhelmingly negative.

Anyway, I am not in any way defending Vice or Hillary. Only trying to figure out, for myself if noone else, why they are acceptable to any part of society but easily discounted fringes in the first place. This is the best I could come up with.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Define "sexist". I'm curious as I have just witnessed your defense of her statement "Women are the primary victims of war."

Do you know why roughly half the population takes issue with that statement? It treats men as disposable and worthless. I'm not the only man who wishes it was only women who went to war, though I'm wishing on myself and other men to be the true victims once womens bodies get blown to pieces and they are shot through the head. They will feel no pain afterwards though, I and the other men however will continue to suffer for what they went through to protect us. How inconsiderate of them. Being dead and all, but not before a torturous murder.

[–]svenskbitch 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I am not sure how you could read an attempt to flesh out the (warped) logic of an ideological opponent as a defense. Nor why I would disagree with what you write. So I am afraid I have no useful comment to make here.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

"I am not sure how you could read an attempt to flesh out the (warped) logic of an ideological opponent as a defense. "

I'm not sure how I read it either. You are fleshing out the logic of a man hating demon, because you really really want to. Why do you want to? Because she's a woman and is somehow right about hating men. You just need to make it PC enough to pass on this sub.

"Guys, what's she's trying to say is that women are victims too! We all know that men die, they die every day. What she's talking about is the pain that women go through, I think some of you missed that."

[–]svenskbitch 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

:) I feel a bit like I would if I, after, say, a moderate, well-evidenced call for more research and resources of male DV victims, would face the riposte that I support wife beaters, want to take resources away from women - perhaps followed by a speculation about how my driving force is frustration at losing my privileges, failure to attract women, and my need to live in a basement because I spend all my time trolling the internet.

I tried to say what I was trying to do. If you cannot take that at face value and have to speculate about my motivations and read what I say like the Devil would read the Bible (Swedish saying), then you are free to, but I cannot think of anything productive to add to it, let alone muster the motivation to try to convince you otherwise. Although it is refreshing to be accused of being PC and a covert feminist extremist rather than a misogynist for a change.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's fine. You do you. I just don't like women. I can't imagine having a productive conversation with one because I would be unable to speak decently. There is no fix for this. I won't be happy till I've accomplished my mission of replacing women for mens purposes. You know how men and women are different? Women are adept at manipulating men for their own gain. How do they do it? They take a mans well meaning nature and through what I would call inhuman lack of integrity, pressure him to do things against his interest. The ideal is that men and women work together, as we are the same species... support, investment, friendship, and affection. However, this is impossible as women do not seek a mans benefit. "Nice Guys" pour favor on women and show off their thoughtfulness and good will by providing them with services and gifts. Women interpret this as an attempt at "payment", which she undervalues. There are many aspects of female nature that I find culminate into the whole of not being human. Among them is womens mission of widdling down the male population through having kids with a very small percentage. They've been doing this since they have existed. So nearly all women get to breed and have offspring, but womens hateful spite for the vast majority of men, their vanity and deluded sense of worth, view most men as unworthy of reproducing. The amount of Y chromosomes right now is but a handful of what was, while the X chromosome has pretty much stayed in tact, minus the bottom 20 percent of women. For men it was the "bottom" 60 percent, because women are just so wonderful. I hate you, and I hate all women. A resounding feeling overcomes me for the effort of giving you what you deserve, obsolescence.

I'm not a MRA though. I'm not even subscribed to this sub. I just wanted to see what the other guys were doing and why they try in vain to change how society views men. This has failed miserably in all but a few of their efforts. The only way forward is to create an artificial companion for men, so that men no longer feel the need to prop women up, or care about what happens to them.

[–]McFeely_Smackup 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

2nd vote for 'fair point'

[–]YuenHsiaoTieng 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is the world we live in. It's disgusting, but for now that's how it works. Hopefully this article will eventually help the men this country is shitting on.

[–]CalvinsCuriosity 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

As a man this is disheartening. We really don't matter. We have no value.

[–]AKnightAlone 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, but you should already know that. Didn't your parents raise you right? /sarcasm

[–]Mode1961 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Except just like the prison system that is being reformed in some areas now, they will change it for women and leave it exactly the same for men.

[–]Innomen 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Fair point.

[–]AilerAiref 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Except the fixes will only be made to apply to women.

[–]xNOM 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well.. depends on who fixes it. If it's the same retards who want to just close female prisons to fix the "female prison problem" then...

[–][deleted] 208 points209 points210 points 7 years ago* (27 children) | Copy Link

How it hurts the poor wittle women who make up 7% of the list... but fuck how it hurts the 93% majority of men who make up the list, which likely has more than 7% innocence rate where they were falsely accused... but hey, it's all about those poor women.

[Footnote: Feminist lurkers, this isn't "all women" hate, this is a men vs women bullshit that your feminist propaganda machine is saying how the punishment for the crime hurts, it's SUPPOSED to hurt, but only points out women, who are a very tiny minority. They are well within the rate you claim is false rape accusation level, so it's acceptable that these some 7% women suffer since it's acceptable that some acclaimed 2-10% of men suffer innocently... which we know it more than 10%. So if you think this is 'all women' hate, you live in a sadistic fantasy land. Seek psychiatric help.]

[–]Etheros64 43 points44 points45 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Can't you also be labeled a sex offender for something as mundane as public urination?

[–][deleted] 39 points40 points41 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, but that's really rare, isn't it?

Edit: Damn... 13 states? wtf?

https://www.businessinsider.com/surprising-things-that-could-make-you-a-sex-offender-2013-10

[–]antilopes 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There is a realistically fixable problem here that we could lobby for using injustice to women as the bait. Many states do not have levels of risk on the list, and that should be fixed.

Listing seems to be used partly as punishment, but it is an unproductive and sometimes counterproductive punishment. For that reason the lists are not public in any country I know outside the US.

In most countries schools and organisations which work with kids are authorised to submit potential staff members to police for checking. Dangerous offenders are notified to neighbors.

I imagine in some jurisdictions any citizen can request a check on an individual, without being able to go on a fishing expedition for their city.

[–]mwobuddy 73 points74 points75 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

How it hurts the poor wittle women who make up 7% of the list... but fuck how it hurts the 93% majority of men who make up the list, which likely has more than 7% innocence rate where they were falsely accused... but hey, it's all about those poor women.

Once gain, when men do sex crimes, they're just being typically male, evil, misgonyistic, rapey, etc. Throw them in a cage and throw away the key. When they get out? They're still subhumans.

But women?... ah, women. They're just mentally ill. They need help. They're not REALLY predatory. They're as much a victim as those they've victimized. Women don't deserve harassment outside of prison no matter what they've done.

Remember, the rule of Feminism is just the same as the old rules of Chauvinistic society: "Fuck men. They're true moral metaphysical agents. If they do wrong, they get disposed of. Women? they're lesser agents like children. Protect and cater to them no matter what they do".

[–][deleted] 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]mwobuddy 17 points18 points19 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Mothers tend to molest their infant - <3 yr old boys while boys and girls were molested/sodomized by girls/women who were unrelated such as baby sitters, teachers, friends of family etc.

Im aware of the disgusting trend. WOmen do it to infants-toddlers-little children. Men do it to 'adolescents'.

Probably the tendency for men to be viewed as child molesting paedophiles for sex with people who are actually pubescent vs prepubescents.

[–][deleted] 7 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Most states have exemptions for that now. Does make me wonder if there's some on the list that could get off the list due to the change in the law...

[–]antilopes 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I believe there are still a lot of US states that do not have an exemption for close ages. That would be a realistic target for political action that would get wide popular support.

[–]-Master-Builder- 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

Fuck everyone on that list other than the poor souls caught peeing out of necessity.

[–]MrSparkle666 37 points38 points39 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I knew I guy in high school that got on the list because he was 18 and slept with a 15 year old who lied and said she was 18. It was completely consensual, but the family found out and now he is a registered sex offender.

[–]Lethn 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is precisely why I'm really fucking cautious when it comes to the whole concept of a sex offenders' list.

[–]jeegte12 17 points18 points19 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

is that the only unjustifiable reason for being on the list? are you sure?

[–]-Master-Builder- 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I don't know. I'm not an expert.

[–]Lethn 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Can't believe you got downvoted for simply saying you don't know about something lol, get a life those who downvoted.

[–]jeegte12 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

he got downvoted because he stated an opinion very strongly and then immediately admitted he has zero authority to have that opinion. he's spewing bullshit and he fucking admitted it.

[–]Lethn 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Fair enough, but people should say that and call him out on it instead of rage downvoting somebody.

[–]jeegte12 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

how do you know a downvote has rage behind it?

[–]Lethn 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Because you always get these silly cunts who get into an argument with somebody and then mysteriously the votes for all of the person's posts go to 0 and it's obviously just one person clicking away to try and get him censored lol.

I'm very observant :P

[–]jeegte12 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

that means you can only find out if no one except one person is doing the voting. or two people if they vote differently.

[+]YuenHsiaoTieng -16 points-15 points-14 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Go stick your head in a pig.

[–]dukunt 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Huh?

[–]AreYouDeaf 12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

GO STICK YOUR HEAD IN A PIG.

[–]BroaxXx 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Good bot

[–]B0tRank -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Thank you, BroaxXx, for voting on AreYouDeaf.

This bot wants to find the best and worst bots on Reddit. You can view results here.


Even if I don't reply to your comment, I'm still listening for votes. Check the webpage to see if your vote registered!

[–]functionalsociopathy -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Good bot

[–][deleted] 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]fullalcoholiccircle 15 points16 points17 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

In fact, men are raped more every day than women

[+]MKApex -14 points-13 points-12 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I think it's because men cause the most rapes, so subjecting a bunch of assholes that have committed violent crimes into a small area for years is going have some harsh negative consequences.

[–]tmone 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

thats a red herring argument. what does the gender of the rapist have anything to do with male victims?

[–]girlwriteswhat 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Eh, you'd be surprised how much female perpetrated sexual abuse goes on in prisons and particularly in juvenile detention centers.

[–]HotDealsInTexas 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

ITT: Literal victim-blaming.

[–][deleted] 33 points34 points35 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

The sex offender registry is being abused. It should be a way of keeping track of people who actually might pose a danger to others. But it's just being used as additional punishment for some crimes. Like a guy who peed in front of people or a couple that had sex in a public park. I'm not saying those things are ok, but no one is at risk of rape or abduction from a drunk peeing dude or a horny pair of exhibitionists. Putting people like that on the list is just punitive and undermines any possible good that the list would do.

[–]superhobo666 21 points22 points23 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

No shit, all you are doing is making it harder to find out if your new neighbor has a history or raping and killing their neighbors because you have to rifle through a list of 50000000000x guys who got drunk and peed on a fucking tree.

[–]Skydiver860 -5 points-4 points-3 points 7 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

so i'm totally against the registry because i personally feel it serves only to give a false sense of safety and security. however, i'd wager that a vast majority of the people on the registry were not convicted of a crime like pissing in public. So let's not pretend there are very few dangerous people on the registry. The registry isn't full of people pissing on a tree so we shouldn't act like it is.

[–]superhobo666 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I never said there were very few dangerous people on the list, dont put words in my my mouth.

I said you make the dangerous people harder to find by filling the list up with guys who drank to much and peed outside, and guys who.are 18/19 dating someone 17.

[–]Skydiver860 -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

rifle through a list of 50000000000x guys who got drunk and peed on a fucking tree.

this, imho, gave me the impression that you were trying to imply that the list was filled with guys who pissed in public. my response was meant to say that it's NOT filled with guys like that. I didn't mean to imply that you meant that there were few dangerous people on there so i apologize.i'll edit and reword my original comment.

[–]badnuub 51 points52 points53 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Vice has been a joke for a long time.

[–]123undeuxtrois1233 points 7 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

I used to enjoy their content but not anymore.

[–]MrWhiteside97 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Their docs are still quite good, the long form journalism has been slowly tending towards Huff Post

[–]yungdolpho 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

ever since Gavin McInnes left

[–]L3tum 17 points18 points19 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

"I want you to teach me so bad..." read one letter dated April 3, 2016, and written on lined paper with a blue pen. "Your my fantasy. I wish I blessed to touch your body [sic]"

I really hope that's a real paragraph.

Her photo, home address, charge (as a teacher she had sex with a 16-year-old student), and even her scars and tattoos are listed on the state sheriff's website. Some news reports about her crime also list her address.

There's an oxymoron (is that the right one?) in there. It says it lists her address two times. Furthermore, "she had sex" of course.

The reason for these post-sentence restrictions come under the guise of public safety, but a growing number of critics are disputing the true benefits of what they call "draconian" laws.

It's very easy to come by in life as a woman without ever landing on that registry. It's much harder for men who can be placed on that for crimes they never committed, and which are completely thought up.

[–]FreeBroccoli 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

There's an oxymoron (is that the right one?) in there. It says it lists her address two times.

Redundancy is the one you're looking for. It isn't in this case though.

Her photo, home address ... are listed on the state sheriff's website. Some news reports about her crime also list her address.

So her address is listed twice because it's referring to two different sources.

[–]L3tum 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If the address is already released by the state (in this case in the registry) then it is redundant to say that someone else also listed her address.

[–]FreeBroccoli 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It is not; the author is emphasizing that this information is easy to find, even without looking at the public registry. The way it's written provides more information than if it left off the latter part.

[–]McFeely_Smackup 15 points16 points17 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The plight of registered female sex offenders could be a hard sell to some

indeed it is.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

People legitimately believe that women are completely innocent from any wrongdoing, and the only reason they would do something bad is because of their environment. I read an article arguing that we should stop sending women to prison altogether. Like jesus christ are people fucking stupid.

[–]thrway_1000 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Archive -- https://archive.is/3MAKu

[–]DrBootyButtcheekz 20 points21 points22 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why can't you misogynists just let women sexually abuse in peace?!?! I don't want to live in a country where a female sexual abuser has to read some perverted letters, it's disgusting! So what if the therapist lady was 30 fucking a 17 year old boy?? He probably wanted it and these ladies don't deserve to be looked at wrong just because they sexuality abuse minors /s

[–]Fortnite_FaceBlaster 18 points19 points20 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

(as a teacher she had sex with a 16-year-old student)

That's a new way of saying "rape".

[–]GregoryGoose 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I think the list is way too public. I remember being a kid and being able to comb through it and laugh with my friends at all the creepiest dudes and trying to see if we could find at least one attractive girl. It's completely public. Nobody should have their lives put out there like that. I think that it should maybe give very minimal information about an individual and if you want more information you have to submit a formal request including all of your information as well. It's not safe for men or women to be completely public on that list; it exposes them to people far worse that might want to commit murder for instance.

[–]Draggonzz 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah. I'm in Canada where we also have a sex offender registry, but it isn't public. It can only be accessed by police or certain other authorities. It's weird in the states where everyone can just browse it.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"The now-mother of three was convicted at 19 for having sex with a 14-year-old male,"

​

Never rapist. Women can't be rapists of course.

[–]TracyMorganFreeman 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So basically punishments hurt, and we shouldn't be punishing women, even for committing crimes.

[–]Offroad_Bandit_01 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

"Draconian" when the shoe is on the other foot.

[–]Skydiver860 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

it's draconian period. it's a law that gives a false sense of security and safety to the community. the reality is if an offender on the registry is gonna reoffend, they're just gonna go somewhere people won't recognize them. not only that but the vast majority of victims of sex offences know the offender. stranger danger is not what it's made out to be.

[–]Offroad_Bandit_01 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It wasn't draconian for all the young men that had their futures ruined because they were still in love with, dating, and sexuality active with their still in HS girlfriends.

Tough, the sexist double-standard ends. Meet bed, now lay in it and shut up.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They're going to lobby to end the sex offender registry for women only aren't they? Just like how they're fighting to end prison time for women only.

"Equality? No thanks, we'll take privilege and supremacy."

[–]Luchadorgreen 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Funny how our society treats sex offenders like subhumans until they’re women.

[–]Themightysavage 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Could somebody hold my coffee while I dont give a fuck about how hard it is for this rapist child molester.

[–]svenskbitch 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I find the blatant omission of even asking the question of what happens to male offenders (especially those of lighter crimes - forget sexual assault, I understand urinating in public or statutory rape with a one year age difference can get you on the list) as repulsive as anyone here.

But this is also a positive development. This debate can only go so far without the corresponding question for men coming to the fore, in a world that at least has to pretend to be for gender equality.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yea, it's only okay to abuse men. Didn't you know?

[–]marcooni1 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is exactly like reasoning with female prisoners BS. Sex offender list and prisons are made for men and doesn´tfit for womyn. We need different punishments for womyn. Pussypass and slap to the wrist are good examples. Womyn are here the real victims. Like this woman. Pedophile and rapist. We should be tolerant and compassionate to female pedophiles and rapists, this was a one time mistake, but no compassion to males. They deserve everything what happens them in prisons and we all know what other prisoners are doing to rapists and pedophiles;

Tl;dr. heavy sarcasm presesnt

[–]EasyOutside4 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Forget the analogies of the comparisons.
This chic is a rapist..no sympathy.

[–]BoabHonker 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Baldwin never felt she could complain "because who is going to believe the sex offender," she said.

The entire justice system and court of public opinion, if a woman is making the claim.

[–]PMmeYOURrareCONTENT 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Good, let her get kinky letters. If she abused someone sexually, she deserves it. (with some very few exceptions perhaps)

[–]XenoX101 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Someone needs to tell them there's an even simpler solution to not going on the registered sex offenders list..

[–]Drclaw411 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Did you know that if you don’t commit a crime, you won’t be emailed shit from strangers for committing that crime?

[–]DestinyWaits -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Very Unpopular opinion: these monsters deserve it.

[–]YuenHsiaoTieng 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Go back to the 13th century.

[–]DestinyWaits 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Why? Someone who has raped an 11 year old holds absolutely no value to me. That being said, I’m not advocating for rape.

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 7 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

One of the women talked about in the article had sex with a 14 year old when she was 19. That should not make you be put on the sex offenders list.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Would you feel the same way about a 19 year old man having sex with a 14 year old girl?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yep.

[–]CellGel1 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So long as you are consistent, I do not mind.

[–]DestinyWaits 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

She is still a sex offender. I don’t see the problem with putting a 19 year old on the registry as at 19 you clearly understand just how messed up and wrong it is. This isn’t just a regular sex offender case, she fucked a kid.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Facts. She should get in trouble, but there is a difference between her and someone who molests prepubescent children, and the sex offender registry does not have the much nuance, because everybody is on the same list.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So, are you saying men sleeping with 14 year old girls is ok then?

[–]DestinyWaits 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She had sex with a 14 year old. At that age it pretty much is prepubescent.

[–]levelate 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

yes it should

[–]Mackowatosc 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It shouldnt? Of course it should. Statutory rape is still rape.

[–]Drclaw411 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

TIL doing an illegal sex thing shouldn’t put somebody on the list of people who do illegal sex things.

[–]WithBothNostrils 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

WFT?! Are they really defending pedophiles?

[–]the_unseen_one 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Vice is such a fucking joke, I can't believe they're still on business

[–]Formaggio_svizzero -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Kek, scroll further down and you get this lovely article

[–]loganphogan -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh no that poor pedophile

[–]Lupinfujiko -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Vice Media is fucking pathetic.

[–]Mythandros -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh boo fucking hoo. I could not possibly care any less than I do.

What about the male sex offenders? Nobody is writing fluff pieces for them (not that they should).

Here's an idea... Have they tried NOT committing sex crimes?

Get out of here with this kind of misguided sympathy.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter