There’s a flawed assumption that the solution to the "male loneliness epidemic" somehow lies with men “being nicer” to women, giving them more chances, or dating women they’re not attracted to.

Loneliness is a structural and cultural problem, not a romantic deficit that men can patch up through mere self-improvement and treating women like human beings oe whatever gibberish bluepill tells men to do. Expecting women to fix male loneliness through romantic availability is basically tools for social engineering, which is fair.

There’s specific things that women need to do to address male loneliness. The responsibility lies in how men anwed society as a whole foster connection, community, friendship, and emotional health for everyone.

Men deserve companionship, friendship, and love, but those things come from being attractive, rich, neurotypical, white although building social skills, self-awareness, and community support is important. The aforementioned traits are really the things that get men into relationship because socialisation always helps the already privileged. Expecting women to change their standards is important. The destruction of family and hypergamy are closely linked. Men have seen socialization isn't what get men into relationships. It's superficial things that matter to women hence high rate of divorce because they get treated badly.

Women can, of course, choose to support male friends, loved ones, and partners as part of healthy mutual relationships which is a bare-minimum, they're also obligated to date someone if they're compatible with someone in their circle. That's how men are going to know it actually works. Men are going to socialize more and get out of redpill thinking.

If anything, the better question is: how can , as a society, help women care about more meaningful social bonds and emotional resilience of men rather than the superficial things like looks and money.

If they look past that than there's a chance that they'll be in actual healthy relationship.