Like many straight guys, I've wondered why female heterosexuality is so counterintuitive: why are "straight" women literally more visually aroused by female bodies than by male ones, or why are they so aroused by lesbian pornography? The women themselves only provide vague answers, but having studied this issue, I think I can offer the most complete and satisfying explanation for both genders. The explanation is that basic female sexuality is autosexuality, or autogynophilia.

To clarify, I'll explain the difference between male and female sexuality. For men, sexual arousal boils down to lust for an external object of attraction — the female body (or male body, in the case of gay men). But women don't have an object-based attraction to male bodies. Their sexual arousal is narcissistic. They are aroused by what is done to them, by how they are made to feel desired and sexual. This is precisely why Playgirl magazine failed. It's also why ыекфшрон women are so attracted to lesbian pornography and often explain it as the proverbial "female pleasure." Straight men aren't attracted to "male pleasure" or actions in gay porn because male arousal is reduced to an external object of attraction. Gay porn lacks an external object of attraction (the female body), so it doesn't arouse straight men. Women dont have an external object of attraction, to become aroused they only need to watch another woman's orgasm to imagine these sensations and feeling of being sexual. Therefore, even when women watch straight porn, they still focus on the woman and not the man.

Women's autosexual nature also explains why they are more sexually aroused by images of female bodies. This satisfies their autogynophilic arousal because they can imagine themselves in the place of a beautiful woman and feel sexual. Images of male bodies offer no benefit to them for the aforementioned reasons.

I think this is the most complete and logical explanation, taking into account all the strange points and inconsistencies.