Sex is subject to the same laws of supply and demand as any other commodity. For straight women, it is in oversupply - there is more on offer than they as a group want or need. For straight men, there is a supply shortage. Getting your dick wet these days is hard (pun intended).

These are facts we can all agree on at a basic level.

The World According to Derp Say, for arguments sake, that the truth really is that most women have an unfair selection bias towards higher SMV men, despite all that dick being thrown their way.

The marketplace pretty much consists of:

  • a majority of picky bitches; and
  • a few hoes who will fuck anything

Men are either: A. chads who get the lion's share of the puss; or B. Betas who struggle to get laid and have to resort to slamming the hoes or pigs less attractive than themselves

Freaky-Nomics As a regular old AFC beta, wouldn't it be worth trying to fuck with the market? Surely beats a tear-stained night alone with a tub of Olay and a couple of grainy phone hacks of Jennifer Laurence.

But whoa, this is controversial, what about instead of slut-shaming, why not encourage sexual freedom for women? Subsidise birth control, more public funding for family planning and sex education in schools. Society is going to the dogs anyway, lets tear the fucker down and allow the heathens what they want!

Crazy I know, but lets imagine women felt truly liberated, and society devolved into a steaming Sodom and Gomorrah of fire breathing whores. Each girl child destined to fuck all the men her heart desired without consequence.

Now, with every woman being a hoe, supply and demand has changed. News Bulletin: Thirsty bitches everywhere want more sex, and aren't afraid to ask! Men presumably can still supply it.

Buy here's the real kicker: if women's demand for sex from men is higher, their bargaining power is also reduced. So now women have to reduce their bar for what they consider high SMV. Men will also have more leverage. Instead of painful one-itis for that HB in CHEM101, you're now all like "Gurrl, I got 100 fine ass sistas blowin up my Whatsapp!". And it'll actually be true. Cos, you know, sluts.

By manipulating the market, negotiating power is more evenly distributed. Women would have less ability to punch above their weight sexually. Eventually people might even generally tend towards sexing others of similar SMV. If that's even still a thing. Everyone wins. No more cry-wanks or angry reddit posts.

Sure, there would unfortunately be likely be way less rapes and women would generally feel safer in their everyday lives but I guess there's a downside to anything.

TL;DR if the brosohere pushed for sexual liberation of women, they'd all get to fuck hotter bitches

EDIT 1 OK maybe I'm late to party, but think I'm learning more about the basic premises behind TRP ideologies:

  • Many of you are steadfastly deterministic. Humans are defined solely, and permanently by their genetic programming, biological imperatives, or whatever you want to call it. Empirical evidence is king, regardless of how you interpret the data. Cultural and environmental influences, individual differences, and freewill count for very little when it comes to our actions.
  • The main source of pain for you is the unobtainable nature of some fantasy state you've created for yourselves. Like Tantalus perpetually seeking that drink of water, you're tormented by the idea of a world where woman freely offer you unfettered sex, in any manner you see fit. Regardless of who you are as a person.
  • Your comfort zone is likely feeling angry and disenfranchised. It may border on addiction. At least it's easier than self-reflection, empathy, or personal growth.

Let the hate mail spew forth...

EDIT 2 - Clarification Yes, I was being sarcastic in my last paragraph about rape women feeling safe. I apologise for the poor attempt at irony.